Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Taking down Flock cameras does nothing. The government will replace them immediately. All it does is secure more sales for Flock and make them more money. Fight them with legislation.

ℚ𝕦𝕒𝕣𝕥𝕖𝕣 ℤ𝕚𝕡

2,920 subscribers

82,221 views • 16 days ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Stop cutting down all the Flock cameras! They're for our protection and we need more of them.

Stop cutting down all the Flock cameras! They're for our protection and we need more of them.

JP Sears

298,414 views • 2 months ago

It’s time to put a stop to government mass surveillance. We must ban Flock cameras and replace them with nothing. ⛓️‍💥

It’s time to put a stop to government mass surveillance. We must ban Flock cameras and replace them with nothing. ⛓️‍💥

Savannah Maddox

161,135 views • 9 days ago

FOX: American cities reject Flock cameras due to privacy concerns ----- Glenn does a great job explaining the ins and outs of Flock cameras. He cites that they are unconstitutional, talks about the number of Flock cameras errors and says it is a mass surveillance system. He also asks what would Fauci have done during the lockdowns with Flock cameras? Flock cameras are an upgrade to the governments "lockdown system" and the they will try to use them again for lockdown 2.0. I think Glenn makes a misstep when he says the cameras must be used constitutionally. There is no way to use them constitutionally - they record without a warrant by default. The only way these tools can conform to the constitution is to remove them and not use them. Lastly, FOX repeats the lie that Flock cameras data is deleted in 30 days. Flock contractually obligates clients keep cameras live and recording and has even turned them back on in municipalities that have tried to shut them down. Flock wants the data above all else and that implies they are keeping the data permanently and selling the data illegally.

FOX: American cities reject Flock cameras due to privacy concerns ----- Glenn does a great job explaining the ins and outs of Flock cameras. He cites that they are unconstitutional, talks about the number of Flock cameras errors and says it is a mass surveillance system. He also asks what would Fauci have done during the lockdowns with Flock cameras? Flock cameras are an upgrade to the governments "lockdown system" and the they will try to use them again for lockdown 2.0. I think Glenn makes a misstep when he says the cameras must be used constitutionally. There is no way to use them constitutionally - they record without a warrant by default. The only way these tools can conform to the constitution is to remove them and not use them. Lastly, FOX repeats the lie that Flock cameras data is deleted in 30 days. Flock contractually obligates clients keep cameras live and recording and has even turned them back on in municipalities that have tried to shut them down. Flock wants the data above all else and that implies they are keeping the data permanently and selling the data illegally.

Orwell Day

25,952 views • 1 month ago

🚨WHAT THE FLOCK🚨 A Flock Safety salesperson emailed the City of Sheboygan offering to sell the city five years of traffic-speed and movement data collected by cameras the city already purchased. The Sheboygan mayor says Flock NEVER informed them the cameras were tracking that form of data. Sheboygan has since bagged its 15 cameras and is moving to cancel the contract. That sales pitch followed years of Flock telling customers they own the data and that the company keeps footage only 30 days. Flock still insists it does not sell the data.

🚨WHAT THE FLOCK🚨 A Flock Safety salesperson emailed the City of Sheboygan offering to sell the city five years of traffic-speed and movement data collected by cameras the city already purchased. The Sheboygan mayor says Flock NEVER informed them the cameras were tracking that form of data. Sheboygan has since bagged its 15 cameras and is moving to cancel the contract. That sales pitch followed years of Flock telling customers they own the data and that the company keeps footage only 30 days. Flock still insists it does not sell the data.

Breanna Morello

25,283 views • 7 days ago

Thomas Massie announces that he is introducing legislation to immediately stop federal funding for Flock Cameras and any other mass surveillance cameras operating under a different name. Massie compares Flock Cameras to the FISA program, calling them un-American and saying they are always abused by bad actors. "We cannot be trading our freedom for a little false promise of security."

Thomas Massie announces that he is introducing legislation to immediately stop federal funding for Flock Cameras and any other mass surveillance cameras operating under a different name. Massie compares Flock Cameras to the FISA program, calling them un-American and saying they are always abused by bad actors. "We cannot be trading our freedom for a little false promise of security."

Shadow of Ezra

456,591 views • 1 month ago

Yes. Let’s put the Flock cameras in every room of every government building while removing them from all of the other locations.

Yes. Let’s put the Flock cameras in every room of every government building while removing them from all of the other locations.

Derrick Evans

20,590 views • 2 months ago

Houston Officials are upset that they can’t just throw away your rights and put up Flock Cameras because people keep cutting them down. They say it helps them do their Police work to catch Criminals. You know, the criminals they let go and make money off of.

Houston Officials are upset that they can’t just throw away your rights and put up Flock Cameras because people keep cutting them down. They say it helps them do their Police work to catch Criminals. You know, the criminals they let go and make money off of.

Johnny Midnight ⚡️

144,803 views • 2 months ago

Unfortunately citizens in Auburn, California have been taking down Flock cameras across the small town and re-emplacing them in canals. Oh no. Don't do that... #sacramento #flock #CivilRights #4thAmendment #police #auburn #GrizzlyFlats #tahoe #eldorado #cops #california #SurveillanceState #alpr

Unfortunately citizens in Auburn, California have been taking down Flock cameras across the small town and re-emplacing them in canals. Oh no. Don't do that... #sacramento #flock #CivilRights #4thAmendment #police #auburn #GrizzlyFlats #tahoe #eldorado #cops #california #SurveillanceState #alpr

Mrgunsngear

51,797 views • 2 months ago

Care for your flock, grow your ranch, and make a beautiful home in Little Sheep Valley. "Live with your sheep on the ranch and look after their needs. Pet and shear them, play with them, and decorate their home. As your flock grows, so will their wishes!"

Care for your flock, grow your ranch, and make a beautiful home in Little Sheep Valley. "Live with your sheep on the ranch and look after their needs. Pet and shear them, play with them, and decorate their home. As your flock grows, so will their wishes!"

Wholesome Games | Celebration August 6-13

16,631 views • 2 months ago

More flock cameras installed in Orting WA? WOO!!! Go team! Fucking love the surveillance state! Ya! Go team! From the local meet the sheriff events i have been to i have personally heard boomers saying how they want more flock cameras and how it makes them feel safer. Beyond boomers and people being paid, is there anyone who supports this shit?

More flock cameras installed in Orting WA? WOO!!! Go team! Fucking love the surveillance state! Ya! Go team! From the local meet the sheriff events i have been to i have personally heard boomers saying how they want more flock cameras and how it makes them feel safer. Beyond boomers and people being paid, is there anyone who supports this shit?

PNWGUERRILLA

20,929 views • 2 months ago

I expect disagreement in the comments for supporting Flock cameras, but it's simple: they catch carjackers and kidnappers. Opposing them is nuts. We wouldn't need Flock cameras if we actually locked people up like Giuliani-Bloomberg did.

I expect disagreement in the comments for supporting Flock cameras, but it's simple: they catch carjackers and kidnappers. Opposing them is nuts. We wouldn't need Flock cameras if we actually locked people up like Giuliani-Bloomberg did.

Ann Coulter

544,311 views • 5 days ago

American shows up in a disco suit and his own homemade Flock safety camera that he made in his garage to the Lee’s Summit, Missouri City Council meeting He’s exposing how the city spent $909,000 on only 54 Flock cameras the cameras remain property of Flock. Even if the contract runs its course and they cancel, Flock will keep the cameras despite paying nearly a million dollars for them It’s true I looked into the flock contracts and they maintain all rights and ownership over the cameras, once installed the city can’t even move the location of the cameras or remove them - Flock hardware “is owned and shall remain the exclusive property of Flock.” - “Title to any Flock Hardware shall not pass to [the city].” A The city may not remove, move or take possession of the units - At the end of the term, Flock removes the cameras The city is leasing the cameras and using the software…. This sounds like one of the biggest ripoffs to taxpayers in history That’s $16,833 per camera over the 5 year contract

American shows up in a disco suit and his own homemade Flock safety camera that he made in his garage to the Lee’s Summit, Missouri City Council meeting He’s exposing how the city spent $909,000 on only 54 Flock cameras the cameras remain property of Flock. Even if the contract runs its course and they cancel, Flock will keep the cameras despite paying nearly a million dollars for them It’s true I looked into the flock contracts and they maintain all rights and ownership over the cameras, once installed the city can’t even move the location of the cameras or remove them - Flock hardware “is owned and shall remain the exclusive property of Flock.” - “Title to any Flock Hardware shall not pass to [the city].” A The city may not remove, move or take possession of the units - At the end of the term, Flock removes the cameras The city is leasing the cameras and using the software…. This sounds like one of the biggest ripoffs to taxpayers in history That’s $16,833 per camera over the 5 year contract

Wall Street Apes

1,273,761 views • 1 day ago

Flock Safety's network now has more than 120,000 cameras across 49 states “Lawmakers from both sides of the aisle have criticized the abuses of Flock technology, with some calling for legislation to bar federal funding for license plate readers. However, half of all states don't have any laws on the books related to license plate readers” It’s time to just outright ban Flock cameras nationwide No one consents to always being under mass surveillance. The issue is how easily it would be to insanely abuse this camera network if you get a tyrannical government in power Also the issue of expanding on these cameras, it will be very easily to keep growing this network, put them everywhere and become a mass surveillance state

Flock Safety's network now has more than 120,000 cameras across 49 states “Lawmakers from both sides of the aisle have criticized the abuses of Flock technology, with some calling for legislation to bar federal funding for license plate readers. However, half of all states don't have any laws on the books related to license plate readers” It’s time to just outright ban Flock cameras nationwide No one consents to always being under mass surveillance. The issue is how easily it would be to insanely abuse this camera network if you get a tyrannical government in power Also the issue of expanding on these cameras, it will be very easily to keep growing this network, put them everywhere and become a mass surveillance state

Wall Street Apes

49,803 views • 1 month ago

Flock cameras are appearing everywhere lately, but public reaction has been largely negative. People have started cutting them down, and vandalism is becoming increasingly common. They Want Total Control. Fk your Flock Cams 📸.

Flock cameras are appearing everywhere lately, but public reaction has been largely negative. People have started cutting them down, and vandalism is becoming increasingly common. They Want Total Control. Fk your Flock Cams 📸.

DG🎭

18,779 views • 2 months ago

Gubernatorial candidate Anthony Hudson is calling for a ban on Flock cameras. Anthony Hudson "If government wants more cameras, fine. I'll tell you where to put them. In every government building, every office, every hallway, every conference room, every place where public officials conduct the people's business."

Gubernatorial candidate Anthony Hudson is calling for a ban on Flock cameras. Anthony Hudson "If government wants more cameras, fine. I'll tell you where to put them. In every government building, every office, every hallway, every conference room, every place where public officials conduct the people's business."

Orwell Day

25,546 views • 2 months ago

PabloReports: Where are you at on Flock cameras? Roy: Massive concerns. Government should stop funding them and stop allowing this mass collection of data on law abiding citizens. That’s one of my concerns today on the CR. We didn’t do anything to deal with Flock cameras.

PabloReports: Where are you at on Flock cameras? Roy: Massive concerns. Government should stop funding them and stop allowing this mass collection of data on law abiding citizens. That’s one of my concerns today on the CR. We didn’t do anything to deal with Flock cameras.

Acyn

23,675 views • 10 days ago

People are very uncomfortable with the fact that Flock Cameras investor Peter Thiel shared over 2,400 emails with Jeffrey Epstein and now Flock cameras are pointed at little kids playgrounds Just take this location, “Here's a flock camera pointed directly at the schoolyard, monitoring where each kid walks, how they get home, if there's an adult with them, which car is picking them up” But it even gets worse than this, I’ll provide in the video an area next to a kids water splash pad that has a huge amount of Flock cameras pointed right at it They say it’s because the cameras are there for enhanced security at high risk locations, but the connection to Epstein has people more than concerned about these camera placements

People are very uncomfortable with the fact that Flock Cameras investor Peter Thiel shared over 2,400 emails with Jeffrey Epstein and now Flock cameras are pointed at little kids playgrounds Just take this location, “Here's a flock camera pointed directly at the schoolyard, monitoring where each kid walks, how they get home, if there's an adult with them, which car is picking them up” But it even gets worse than this, I’ll provide in the video an area next to a kids water splash pad that has a huge amount of Flock cameras pointed right at it They say it’s because the cameras are there for enhanced security at high risk locations, but the connection to Epstein has people more than concerned about these camera placements

Wall Street Apes

200,531 views • 1 month ago

Thomas Massie talks about his soon to be released legislation to try to stop the use of Flock cameras and mass surveillance technologies, by removing ALL Federal funding for any municipality that uses Flock cameras. He also mentions FISA program abuses prove the government cannot be trusted with this technology.

Thomas Massie talks about his soon to be released legislation to try to stop the use of Flock cameras and mass surveillance technologies, by removing ALL Federal funding for any municipality that uses Flock cameras. He also mentions FISA program abuses prove the government cannot be trusted with this technology.

Orwell Day

21,427 views • 1 month ago

Warrantless surveillance is UNCONSTITUTIONAL! I've been pushing legislation to fight Flock/ALPRs for years, but "Republican" Speakers Phelan and Burrows have blocked them, to allow Texans to be taxed out of their homes and forced to fund them. Joined CBS Austin 👇

Warrantless surveillance is UNCONSTITUTIONAL! I've been pushing legislation to fight Flock/ALPRs for years, but "Republican" Speakers Phelan and Burrows have blocked them, to allow Texans to be taxed out of their homes and forced to fund them. Joined CBS Austin 👇

Brian Harrison

15,592 views • 7 days ago

Flock cameras have become a hot topic. James Fishback breaks down why they have fallen under scrutiny: “They should be opposed to Flock cameras because it's the government spying on us. And I believe, as a constitutional conservative, that the government should know next to nothing about us, but we should know almost everything about the government. And so what Flock cameras do, there are 4,000 and counting here in Florida. They're not just on our roads. They're outside of our churches, our parks, our playgrounds. Even hiking trails have them. It allows the government to track you wherever you are. And we don't want that.”

Flock cameras have become a hot topic. James Fishback breaks down why they have fallen under scrutiny: “They should be opposed to Flock cameras because it's the government spying on us. And I believe, as a constitutional conservative, that the government should know next to nothing about us, but we should know almost everything about the government. And so what Flock cameras do, there are 4,000 and counting here in Florida. They're not just on our roads. They're outside of our churches, our parks, our playgrounds. Even hiking trails have them. It allows the government to track you wherever you are. And we don't want that.”

The DeVory Darkins Show

20,786 views • 28 days ago