Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Taking it up a notch higherโ€ฆ A first like never before ๐Ÿ”ฅ RE-EDITING + 4K RESTORATION + RE-MASTERING + RE-RECORDING = REINCARNATING ๐Ÿ˜Ž #Athidhi4K ๐‘๐„๐ˆ๐๐‚๐€๐‘๐๐€๐“๐ˆ๐๐† in style on ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ— ๐Œ๐š๐ฒ ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ” worldwideโค๏ธโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ Super๐ŸŒŸ Mahesh Babu SurenderReddy AMRITA RAO ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ #ManiSharma #RameshBabu REEL TALKIES #AthidhiVibe

AthidhiVibe's profile picture

Athidhi4K

7,595 subscribers

130,840 views โ€ข 4 months ago โ€ขvia X (Twitter)

ArtsMusicScience & Technology#Athidhi4K
LIVE

Anya Rossiโ€ข Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Vasthava Naa Raja Eroju ๐Ÿ”ฅ #Athidhi4K ๐‘๐„๐ˆ๐๐‚๐€๐‘๐๐€๐“๐ˆ๐๐† in cinemas on ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ— ๐Œ๐š๐ฒ ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ”โค๏ธโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ Super๐ŸŒŸ Mahesh Babu SurenderReddy AMRITA RAO ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ #ManiSharma #RameshBabu REEL TALKIES #AthidhiVibe
0:38

Vasthava Naa Raja Eroju ๐Ÿ”ฅ #Athidhi4K ๐‘๐„๐ˆ๐๐‚๐€๐‘๐๐€๐“๐ˆ๐๐† in cinemas on ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ— ๐Œ๐š๐ฒ ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ”โค๏ธโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ Super๐ŸŒŸ Mahesh Babu SurenderReddy AMRITA RAO ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ #ManiSharma #RameshBabu REEL TALKIES #AthidhiVibe

Athidhi4K

41,576 views โ€ข 5 months ago

A classic that redefined style and action! ๐Ÿ”ฅ #Athidhi4K ๐‘๐„๐ˆ๐๐‚๐€๐‘๐๐€๐“๐ˆ๐๐† in cinemas on ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ— ๐Œ๐š๐ฒ ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ”โค๏ธโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ Super๐ŸŒŸ Mahesh Babu SurenderReddy AMRITA RAO ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ #ManiSharma #RameshBabu REEL TALKIES #AthidhiVibe
0:44

A classic that redefined style and action! ๐Ÿ”ฅ #Athidhi4K ๐‘๐„๐ˆ๐๐‚๐€๐‘๐๐€๐“๐ˆ๐๐† in cinemas on ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ— ๐Œ๐š๐ฒ ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ”โค๏ธโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ Super๐ŸŒŸ Mahesh Babu SurenderReddy AMRITA RAO ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ #ManiSharma #RameshBabu REEL TALKIES #AthidhiVibe

Mahesh Babu Global FC

11,158 views โ€ข 5 months ago

The response to the #Athidhi teaser in theatres has been amazing ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿ”ฅ #Athidhi4K ๐‘๐„๐ˆ๐๐‚๐€๐‘๐๐€๐“๐ˆ๐๐† in cinemas on ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ— ๐Œ๐š๐ฒ ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ”โค๏ธโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ Super๐ŸŒŸ Mahesh Babu SurenderReddy AMRITA RAO ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ #ManiSharma #RameshBabu REEL TALKIES #AthidhiVibe
0:47

The response to the #Athidhi teaser in theatres has been amazing ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿ”ฅ #Athidhi4K ๐‘๐„๐ˆ๐๐‚๐€๐‘๐๐€๐“๐ˆ๐๐† in cinemas on ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ— ๐Œ๐š๐ฒ ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ”โค๏ธโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ Super๐ŸŒŸ Mahesh Babu SurenderReddy AMRITA RAO ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ #ManiSharma #RameshBabu REEL TALKIES #AthidhiVibe

Athidhi4K

15,821 views โ€ข 4 months ago

This May, get ready to vibe with our #Athidhi ๐Ÿ•บโค๏ธโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ #Athidhi4K ๐‘๐„๐ˆ๐๐‚๐€๐‘๐๐€๐“๐ˆ๐๐† in cinemas on ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ— ๐Œ๐š๐ฒ ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ” โค๏ธโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ Superstar ๐ŸŒŸ Mahesh Babu SurenderReddy AMRITA RAO ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ #ManiSharma #RameshBabu Aditya Music REEL TALKIES #AthidhiVibe
0:30

This May, get ready to vibe with our #Athidhi ๐Ÿ•บโค๏ธโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ #Athidhi4K ๐‘๐„๐ˆ๐๐‚๐€๐‘๐๐€๐“๐ˆ๐๐† in cinemas on ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ— ๐Œ๐š๐ฒ ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ” โค๏ธโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ Superstar ๐ŸŒŸ Mahesh Babu SurenderReddy AMRITA RAO ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ #ManiSharma #RameshBabu Aditya Music REEL TALKIES #AthidhiVibe

Athidhi4K

19,444 views โ€ข 4 months ago

Every tune paints a feelingโ€ฆ ๐ŸŽผ You hear something timeless, yet brand new โœจ #Athidhi4K Reincarnation Music Promo OUT NOW ๐Ÿ’• ๐‘๐„๐ˆ๐๐‚๐€๐‘๐๐€๐“๐ˆ๐๐† in cinemas on ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ— ๐Œ๐š๐ฒ ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ”โค๏ธโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ Super๐ŸŒŸ Mahesh Babu SurenderReddy AMRITA RAO ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ #ManiSharma #RameshBabu REEL TALKIES #AthidhiVibe
0:49

Every tune paints a feelingโ€ฆ ๐ŸŽผ You hear something timeless, yet brand new โœจ #Athidhi4K Reincarnation Music Promo OUT NOW ๐Ÿ’• ๐‘๐„๐ˆ๐๐‚๐€๐‘๐๐€๐“๐ˆ๐๐† in cinemas on ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ— ๐Œ๐š๐ฒ ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ”โค๏ธโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ Super๐ŸŒŸ Mahesh Babu SurenderReddy AMRITA RAO ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ #ManiSharma #RameshBabu REEL TALKIES #AthidhiVibe

Athidhi4K

53,236 views โ€ข 4 months ago

Disturb cheyaku.. Disturb cheyaku.. Pillo padi padi.. โค๏ธโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ - A #ManiSharma Musical ๐ŸŽถ ๐‘๐„๐ˆ๐๐‚๐€๐‘๐๐€๐“๐ˆ๐๐† in cinemas on ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ— ๐Œ๐š๐ฒ ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ” #KhiladiKoona #Athidhi Super๐ŸŒŸ Mahesh Babu SurenderReddy AMRITA RAO ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ #RameshBabu #Athidhi4K #AthidhiVibe Aditya Music #MaheshBabu
0:38

Disturb cheyaku.. Disturb cheyaku.. Pillo padi padi.. โค๏ธโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ - A #ManiSharma Musical ๐ŸŽถ ๐‘๐„๐ˆ๐๐‚๐€๐‘๐๐€๐“๐ˆ๐๐† in cinemas on ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ— ๐Œ๐š๐ฒ ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ” #KhiladiKoona #Athidhi Super๐ŸŒŸ Mahesh Babu SurenderReddy AMRITA RAO ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ #RameshBabu #Athidhi4K #AthidhiVibe Aditya Music #MaheshBabu

Aditya Music

25,587 views โ€ข 4 months ago

Vasthava.. Na Raaja.. Eroju..๐Ÿ’•๐Ÿ’ซ #Athidhi4k Vol-1 OST is streaming now on Aditya Music.๐ŸŽปโœจ โ–ถ๏ธ A #ManiSharma Musical ๐ŸŽถ ๐‘๐„๐ˆ๐๐‚๐€๐‘๐๐€๐“๐ˆ๐๐† in cinemas on ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ— ๐Œ๐š๐ฒ ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ” #VasthavaNaRaaja #Super๐ŸŒŸ Mahesh Babu SurenderReddy AMRITA RAO ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ #RameshBabu Aditya Music REEL TALKIES #AthidhiVibe
0:46

Vasthava.. Na Raaja.. Eroju..๐Ÿ’•๐Ÿ’ซ #Athidhi4k Vol-1 OST is streaming now on Aditya Music.๐ŸŽปโœจ โ–ถ๏ธ A #ManiSharma Musical ๐ŸŽถ ๐‘๐„๐ˆ๐๐‚๐€๐‘๐๐€๐“๐ˆ๐๐† in cinemas on ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ— ๐Œ๐š๐ฒ ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ” #VasthavaNaRaaja #Super๐ŸŒŸ Mahesh Babu SurenderReddy AMRITA RAO ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ #RameshBabu Aditya Music REEL TALKIES #AthidhiVibe

Aditya Music

25,207 views โ€ข 3 months ago

His Rage. His Revenge. His Redemption ๐Ÿ”ฅ And he means itโ€ฆ Yeh Khatham Khatham ๐Ÿ’ฅ #Athidhi4K REINCARNATING in Cinemas On 29 MAY 2026 โค๏ธโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ Overseas by Prathyangira Cinemas SUPER STAR Mahesh Babu #Athidhi SurenderReddy AMRITA RAO ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ #ManiSharma #RameshBabu REEL TALKIES Athidhi4K
0:27

His Rage. His Revenge. His Redemption ๐Ÿ”ฅ And he means itโ€ฆ Yeh Khatham Khatham ๐Ÿ’ฅ #Athidhi4K REINCARNATING in Cinemas On 29 MAY 2026 โค๏ธโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ Overseas by Prathyangira Cinemas SUPER STAR Mahesh Babu #Athidhi SurenderReddy AMRITA RAO ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ณ #ManiSharma #RameshBabu REEL TALKIES Athidhi4K

Prathyangira Cinemas

61,570 views โ€ข 4 months ago

Ajay Kumar IPS Reporting on August 9th ๐Ÿ˜Ž๐Ÿ”ฅ The BLOCKBUSTER That Turned Every Theatre into a Festival Returnsโ€ฆ Bigger Than Ever! ๐Ÿคฉ Dookudu 4K Re-release Announcement Teaser Out Now!๐Ÿ”— Celebrate SSMBโ€™s Birthday with #Dookudu4K in theatres worldwide on August 9th โค๏ธโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ #Dookudu #DookuduReRelease Superstar Mahesh Babu Samantha Sreenu Vaitla thaman S 14 Reels 14 Reels Plus Mango Mass Media
0:30

Ajay Kumar IPS Reporting on August 9th ๐Ÿ˜Ž๐Ÿ”ฅ The BLOCKBUSTER That Turned Every Theatre into a Festival Returnsโ€ฆ Bigger Than Ever! ๐Ÿคฉ Dookudu 4K Re-release Announcement Teaser Out Now!๐Ÿ”— Celebrate SSMBโ€™s Birthday with #Dookudu4K in theatres worldwide on August 9th โค๏ธโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ #Dookudu #DookuduReRelease Superstar Mahesh Babu Samantha Sreenu Vaitla thaman S 14 Reels 14 Reels Plus Mango Mass Media

Telugu FilmNagar

15,088 views โ€ข 1 month ago

๐Ÿšจ BTC IS ABOUT TO FOOL EVERYONE AGAIN ๐Ÿšจ I know because I was there 70k-80k now = 25k-30k last cycle In 2022 everyone called the move out of that range a bear market rally The same people who said that spent the next two years watching from the sidelines Re-accumulation never feels like re-accumulation when you're inside it It feels like slow death But that's the point - the market needs you to give up before it lets you win If we get one more flush below the lows, your timeline will be screaming sell That's exactly when I'll be buying everything I can Don't be short when this resolves And if manipulation takes us lower first - abuse it The biggest move of this cycle starts exactly where it feels most wrong to buy I'll warn you NOTIFS ON!
0:53

๐Ÿšจ BTC IS ABOUT TO FOOL EVERYONE AGAIN ๐Ÿšจ I know because I was there 70k-80k now = 25k-30k last cycle In 2022 everyone called the move out of that range a bear market rally The same people who said that spent the next two years watching from the sidelines Re-accumulation never feels like re-accumulation when you're inside it It feels like slow death But that's the point - the market needs you to give up before it lets you win If we get one more flush below the lows, your timeline will be screaming sell That's exactly when I'll be buying everything I can Don't be short when this resolves And if manipulation takes us lower first - abuse it The biggest move of this cycle starts exactly where it feels most wrong to buy I'll warn you NOTIFS ON!

NoName

62,783 views โ€ข 1 month ago

Can you restore a BlackStone sent to the wasteland...? Some solid tips here on "how-to." You can absolutely restore a rusty curb-find Blackstone griddle from the wasteland and make it last for years with proper care. Start by firing up all the burners on high for about 20 minutes to loosen old seasoning and surface rust, then let it cool slightly. Once itโ€™s manageable, scrape off loose debris with a metal spatula or scraper. Apply a thin layer of cooking oil and scrub vigorously in circular motions using a pumice grill stone (the most effective tool), steel wool, or medium-grit sandpaper. For stubborn rust spots, a vinegar-and-water mix can sit for a few minutes to help dissolve it before wiping everything clean. Rinse lightly with water if needed, but dry the surface completelyโ€”using low heat helps evaporate any moisture to prevent new rust. The key to longevity is re-seasoning: spread a very thin layer of high-smoke-point oil like flaxseed (ideal), avocado, or canola across the entire cooktop with a paper towel. Heat it on medium-high until it smokes, usually 15โ€“20 minutes, then repeat this process 3โ€“5 times to build a dark, durable non-stick patina. Over time, food will stick less and the surface will perform like new. To keep it lasting โ€œforever,โ€ always clean it while still hot after every use by scraping residue, wiping with warm water, and applying a light oil coat. Never use soap unless doing a deep clean, avoid leaving it exposed to rain, and store it covered or indoors. Re-season monthly or as needed, and it will reward you with many great cooks ahead. Grab a grill stone, scraper, and some oil, and youโ€™ll have it back in action in just a couple of hours plus seasoning time. ๐Ÿ”ฅ
2:01

Can you restore a BlackStone sent to the wasteland...? Some solid tips here on "how-to." You can absolutely restore a rusty curb-find Blackstone griddle from the wasteland and make it last for years with proper care. Start by firing up all the burners on high for about 20 minutes to loosen old seasoning and surface rust, then let it cool slightly. Once itโ€™s manageable, scrape off loose debris with a metal spatula or scraper. Apply a thin layer of cooking oil and scrub vigorously in circular motions using a pumice grill stone (the most effective tool), steel wool, or medium-grit sandpaper. For stubborn rust spots, a vinegar-and-water mix can sit for a few minutes to help dissolve it before wiping everything clean. Rinse lightly with water if needed, but dry the surface completelyโ€”using low heat helps evaporate any moisture to prevent new rust. The key to longevity is re-seasoning: spread a very thin layer of high-smoke-point oil like flaxseed (ideal), avocado, or canola across the entire cooktop with a paper towel. Heat it on medium-high until it smokes, usually 15โ€“20 minutes, then repeat this process 3โ€“5 times to build a dark, durable non-stick patina. Over time, food will stick less and the surface will perform like new. To keep it lasting โ€œforever,โ€ always clean it while still hot after every use by scraping residue, wiping with warm water, and applying a light oil coat. Never use soap unless doing a deep clean, avoid leaving it exposed to rain, and store it covered or indoors. Re-season monthly or as needed, and it will reward you with many great cooks ahead. Grab a grill stone, scraper, and some oil, and youโ€™ll have it back in action in just a couple of hours plus seasoning time. ๐Ÿ”ฅ

๐Ÿšซ๐Ÿ‘๏ธDrinks on Saturday๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ

116,886 views โ€ข 3 months ago

Trump just flatly stated he believes $IBM stock is "gonna go up a lot more." While the retail crowd treats this like a passing headline, the smart money recognizes the administration is signaling the ultimate national champion of the post-silicon era. This is not empty rhetoric. The Commerce Department recently finalized a massive two billion dollar quantum computing package where the federal government is taking direct equity stakes in critical domestic infrastructure. $IBM single-handedly locked down half of that entire allocation. The company is taking its one billion dollar federal award and matching it with one billion of its own cash to spin off Anderon, a standalone pure-play quantum wafer foundry in Albany. When the state takes a literal equity position on your cap table and the president publicly backs the stock, traditional valuation models become completely obsolete. $IBM is not a slow-moving legacy enterprise play anymore. It has been designated as a state-underwritten chokepoint that will control the foundational fabrication rules and standards for the next century of computing. With fifteen billion dollars in annual free cash flow, $IBM never needed government survival capital. This is a calculated geopolitical alliance to monopolize the quantum supply chain before foreign adversaries can even close the gap. The structural bottleneck has been chosen, and the institutional re-rating is just getting started. NFA, do your own DD
0:33

Trump just flatly stated he believes $IBM stock is "gonna go up a lot more." While the retail crowd treats this like a passing headline, the smart money recognizes the administration is signaling the ultimate national champion of the post-silicon era. This is not empty rhetoric. The Commerce Department recently finalized a massive two billion dollar quantum computing package where the federal government is taking direct equity stakes in critical domestic infrastructure. $IBM single-handedly locked down half of that entire allocation. The company is taking its one billion dollar federal award and matching it with one billion of its own cash to spin off Anderon, a standalone pure-play quantum wafer foundry in Albany. When the state takes a literal equity position on your cap table and the president publicly backs the stock, traditional valuation models become completely obsolete. $IBM is not a slow-moving legacy enterprise play anymore. It has been designated as a state-underwritten chokepoint that will control the foundational fabrication rules and standards for the next century of computing. With fifteen billion dollars in annual free cash flow, $IBM never needed government survival capital. This is a calculated geopolitical alliance to monopolize the quantum supply chain before foreign adversaries can even close the gap. The structural bottleneck has been chosen, and the institutional re-rating is just getting started. NFA, do your own DD

Vaelis

164,751 views โ€ข 3 months ago

When I look at this am not surprised.. I grew up in Tnagar.. it was a street studded with film stars.. end of the road it was Krishna gaaru.. his son Naresh went to college with my cousin brother and they were good buddies.. have never seen Mahesh then.. then we got news that someone had purchased the adjacent house which was owned by a Naidu family.. it was one old style bungalow.. the new owner got everything demolished and started construction of a new house.. we never got to know who it was for a while.. the construction had reached the first floor and we neighborhood kids were playing cricket when we got news that the owner of the property had come for inspection of the house.. like a film back shot we just got to see his back.. a tall man in a white kurta and blue jeans inspecting the construction.. we all screamed unknowingly and he turned around.. a handsome looking man wearing aviator style Ray Ban sun glasses.. he stopped to greet these small kids.. asked us where we lived and went on his way.. Then to our surprise and shock, the building was demolished again and reconstructed because the man whom we met did not like what he saw.. then the house came up.. a sprawling bungalow and the occupants moved in.. the man and his family along with his brothers.. we were told he was Chiranjeevi.. a Telugu film industry super star.. we then got to see hordes of buses that used to land up on our street like never before and fans literally in 1000s like this.. every single day lining up to meet him.. and he would patiently meet them.. take photographs.. sign autographs and be on his way.. we then were curious how the house looked inside.. we thought we have to make friends with his little son.. an active naughty little kid.. one day we did get to meet him I think when he was cycling on our road with a security.. he said his name was Ram Charan and asked us to come home to play in the front yard.. there he let us sit inside Chiruโ€™s Toyota Sera.. never once did any of them in their house show any filmy attitude.. I also had seen Pawan Kalyan.. then a very silent and shy young man who was pursuing his studies and Nagendra Babu.. Chirus other brother who was already in the movies.. it was only after my dad got a transfer to Hyderabad for work did we know the power of Chiranjeevi.. an Anjaneya bhakta who owed his success to Bajrang Bali.. such great memories.. Happy birthday Chiranjeevi Konidela gaaru Pawan Kalyan Ram Charan
1:49

When I look at this am not surprised.. I grew up in Tnagar.. it was a street studded with film stars.. end of the road it was Krishna gaaru.. his son Naresh went to college with my cousin brother and they were good buddies.. have never seen Mahesh then.. then we got news that someone had purchased the adjacent house which was owned by a Naidu family.. it was one old style bungalow.. the new owner got everything demolished and started construction of a new house.. we never got to know who it was for a while.. the construction had reached the first floor and we neighborhood kids were playing cricket when we got news that the owner of the property had come for inspection of the house.. like a film back shot we just got to see his back.. a tall man in a white kurta and blue jeans inspecting the construction.. we all screamed unknowingly and he turned around.. a handsome looking man wearing aviator style Ray Ban sun glasses.. he stopped to greet these small kids.. asked us where we lived and went on his way.. Then to our surprise and shock, the building was demolished again and reconstructed because the man whom we met did not like what he saw.. then the house came up.. a sprawling bungalow and the occupants moved in.. the man and his family along with his brothers.. we were told he was Chiranjeevi.. a Telugu film industry super star.. we then got to see hordes of buses that used to land up on our street like never before and fans literally in 1000s like this.. every single day lining up to meet him.. and he would patiently meet them.. take photographs.. sign autographs and be on his way.. we then were curious how the house looked inside.. we thought we have to make friends with his little son.. an active naughty little kid.. one day we did get to meet him I think when he was cycling on our road with a security.. he said his name was Ram Charan and asked us to come home to play in the front yard.. there he let us sit inside Chiruโ€™s Toyota Sera.. never once did any of them in their house show any filmy attitude.. I also had seen Pawan Kalyan.. then a very silent and shy young man who was pursuing his studies and Nagendra Babu.. Chirus other brother who was already in the movies.. it was only after my dad got a transfer to Hyderabad for work did we know the power of Chiranjeevi.. an Anjaneya bhakta who owed his success to Bajrang Bali.. such great memories.. Happy birthday Chiranjeevi Konidela gaaru Pawan Kalyan Ram Charan

NR

52,287 views โ€ข 13 days ago

How to set up Claude Cowork so it actually works like an AI chief of staff (not just another chatbot): 1. Most people open Cowork, type a message, and get generic output. It's not a Claude problem. It's a setup problem. Cowork needs context before it can help you. Who you are. How you work. What you're building. Your team. Your priorities. Give it that, and every session feels like picking up a conversation with an executive assistant. 2. The setup has three layers: a) Global instructions (who you are, how you work, what Claude should never do). b) Connectors (Slack, Gmail, Google Calendar, Notion) c) And a folder structure on your computer that acts as Claude's long-term memory. That combination is what takes it from generic to personalized. 3. Skills are the real leverage. A skill is a markdown file that tells Claude exactly how to do one thing well. Write my newsletter. Coach me on a decision. Review a case study. Each skill lives in its own folder with context, examples, and a definition of what success looks like. 4. We built a CEO coach skill in the video below. Gave it business context, leadership style, company goals. Then tested it with a real decision: should we increase our newsletter from once to twice a week? It came back with trade-offs, second-order consequences, and risk assessment. 5. Then we built a multi-agent advisory board. Five subagents, each with a defined persona: a) the operator b) the skeptic c) the customer advocate d) the finance partner e) the legal/risk advisor. You feed it a decision. Each agent evaluates independently. The main agent synthesizes the feedback. It's like having a board meeting on demand. 6. Third skill: a thought leadership content pipeline. Topic scoring, idea capture, distribution cadence, tone calibration. All built from your actual expertise and audience. Designed so an executive can go from idea to published post without starting from scratch every time. 7. The workspace map is what ties it all together. It's a top-level file that shows Claude how to navigate your entire setup. Which folders exist, what skills live where, how to invoke them. Without it, Claude has to search for everything. With it, Claude goes straight to what it needs. 8. Everything you build is portable. The folder structure works in Cowork, Claude Code, and Codex. Push it to a private GitHub repo and you can access it from your phone through Claude Code, or use Claude Dispatch. 9. The pattern is repeatable. Pick a task you do often. Create a folder. Build a skill. Add examples of what success looks like, and what a bad output looks like. Test it. Workshop it. Move on to the next one. Each skill is like onboarding a new employee who never forgets and never needs to be re-trained. The people who invest in this setup now are the ones who will have a 10x advantage when these tools get even better. And they're getting better fast. I sat down with Alex Lieberman on Human In The Loop and we built all three of these live from scratch. Full breakdown in the video below.. I tried to explain this as clear as possible for my non-developer crowd. Send it to someone who should be using Cowork but isn't yet. Or bookmark it to level up when you're ready. Watch ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿผ
51:23

How to set up Claude Cowork so it actually works like an AI chief of staff (not just another chatbot): 1. Most people open Cowork, type a message, and get generic output. It's not a Claude problem. It's a setup problem. Cowork needs context before it can help you. Who you are. How you work. What you're building. Your team. Your priorities. Give it that, and every session feels like picking up a conversation with an executive assistant. 2. The setup has three layers: a) Global instructions (who you are, how you work, what Claude should never do). b) Connectors (Slack, Gmail, Google Calendar, Notion) c) And a folder structure on your computer that acts as Claude's long-term memory. That combination is what takes it from generic to personalized. 3. Skills are the real leverage. A skill is a markdown file that tells Claude exactly how to do one thing well. Write my newsletter. Coach me on a decision. Review a case study. Each skill lives in its own folder with context, examples, and a definition of what success looks like. 4. We built a CEO coach skill in the video below. Gave it business context, leadership style, company goals. Then tested it with a real decision: should we increase our newsletter from once to twice a week? It came back with trade-offs, second-order consequences, and risk assessment. 5. Then we built a multi-agent advisory board. Five subagents, each with a defined persona: a) the operator b) the skeptic c) the customer advocate d) the finance partner e) the legal/risk advisor. You feed it a decision. Each agent evaluates independently. The main agent synthesizes the feedback. It's like having a board meeting on demand. 6. Third skill: a thought leadership content pipeline. Topic scoring, idea capture, distribution cadence, tone calibration. All built from your actual expertise and audience. Designed so an executive can go from idea to published post without starting from scratch every time. 7. The workspace map is what ties it all together. It's a top-level file that shows Claude how to navigate your entire setup. Which folders exist, what skills live where, how to invoke them. Without it, Claude has to search for everything. With it, Claude goes straight to what it needs. 8. Everything you build is portable. The folder structure works in Cowork, Claude Code, and Codex. Push it to a private GitHub repo and you can access it from your phone through Claude Code, or use Claude Dispatch. 9. The pattern is repeatable. Pick a task you do often. Create a folder. Build a skill. Add examples of what success looks like, and what a bad output looks like. Test it. Workshop it. Move on to the next one. Each skill is like onboarding a new employee who never forgets and never needs to be re-trained. The people who invest in this setup now are the ones who will have a 10x advantage when these tools get even better. And they're getting better fast. I sat down with Alex Lieberman on Human In The Loop and we built all three of these live from scratch. Full breakdown in the video below.. I tried to explain this as clear as possible for my non-developer crowd. Send it to someone who should be using Cowork but isn't yet. Or bookmark it to level up when you're ready. Watch ๐Ÿ‘‡๐Ÿผ

JJ Englert

572,438 views โ€ข 5 months ago

Marc Andreessen says the best engineers alive stopped sleeping on purpose, and every one of them calls it the happiest theyโ€™ve ever been. Andreessen: โ€œYouโ€™re up all night doing AI coding because youโ€™re getting so much done that you canโ€™t turn off. The opportunity cost of going to sleep is too high.โ€ The body has one price it never negotiates. An hour of this just cleared it. They call them AI vampires now. Twenty agents working the night shift, and one human who refuses to be the bottleneck in his own life. Andreessen: โ€œTheyโ€™re sleep deprived, theyโ€™ve got bags under their eyes, theyโ€™re clearly not taking care of themselves. And theyโ€™re absolutely ecstatic.โ€ Burnout is exhaustion in the absence of meaning. This is the reverse. Exhaustion from an oversupply. It was supposed to make us obsolete. It made us insatiable. We have only ever met desire in a cage. Uncaged, we call it sickness. Wanting more than you could reach was a wound with no treatment, so we made a virtue of not wanting. Moderation. Contentment. Being realistic. Knowing your limits. Handed down as wisdom. All of it anesthesia for a species that could not afford its own ideas. Underneath the vampires sits a quieter story that does far more damage. A friend on Wall Street. MIT computer science degree, thirty five years ago. Then the market bid higher for his hours, and he put it down for three decades. Andreessen: โ€œHeโ€™s picked up coding with AI. Heโ€™s completely re-automated his entire house.โ€ Nothing was resurrected. Nothing had ever died. Andreessen: โ€œโ€ฆin his spare time has generated 500,000 lines of code, just by working with AI.โ€ He never lacked the vision. He lacked the hours. Three decades of wanting with nowhere to put it. Desire doesnโ€™t die when you starve it. It goes quiet, and you start describing it in the past tense. Andreessen: โ€œThe coders that are using AI, the estimate is right now that theyโ€™re 20 times more productive than they were before they started using AI.โ€ Not twenty percent. Twenty times. He draws the pessimistic case from it himself. Andreessen: โ€œIf thereโ€™s only a limited amount of software that people want in the world, then yeah, youโ€™re going to get mass unemployment.โ€ One clause in that sentence holds up the entire automation debate. A limited amount that people want. Every number we have on human demand was taken inside a rationing regime. We measured the ideas that could clear a payroll. Everything beneath that line never existed long enough to be counted. The house that works the way you pictured it. The fix nobody else needs. The idea too small to fund and too personal to sell. We spent a century measuring the supply curve and filed the result under human nature. Nobody alive has ever seen what a person wants. Only what they could afford to want. You were never a person with limits. You were a person with prices. Scarcity was never only a constraint. It was an alibi. It let everyone believe the life they never lived was taken from them. I would have, but. There is no but anymore. The vampires arenโ€™t up all night because the machine demands it. Theyโ€™re up because the thing they always meant to make finally stopped being impossible. You have one too. Youโ€™ve just been describing it in the past tense. That was never a verdict on you. It was a price. The price went to zero.
1:57

Marc Andreessen says the best engineers alive stopped sleeping on purpose, and every one of them calls it the happiest theyโ€™ve ever been. Andreessen: โ€œYouโ€™re up all night doing AI coding because youโ€™re getting so much done that you canโ€™t turn off. The opportunity cost of going to sleep is too high.โ€ The body has one price it never negotiates. An hour of this just cleared it. They call them AI vampires now. Twenty agents working the night shift, and one human who refuses to be the bottleneck in his own life. Andreessen: โ€œTheyโ€™re sleep deprived, theyโ€™ve got bags under their eyes, theyโ€™re clearly not taking care of themselves. And theyโ€™re absolutely ecstatic.โ€ Burnout is exhaustion in the absence of meaning. This is the reverse. Exhaustion from an oversupply. It was supposed to make us obsolete. It made us insatiable. We have only ever met desire in a cage. Uncaged, we call it sickness. Wanting more than you could reach was a wound with no treatment, so we made a virtue of not wanting. Moderation. Contentment. Being realistic. Knowing your limits. Handed down as wisdom. All of it anesthesia for a species that could not afford its own ideas. Underneath the vampires sits a quieter story that does far more damage. A friend on Wall Street. MIT computer science degree, thirty five years ago. Then the market bid higher for his hours, and he put it down for three decades. Andreessen: โ€œHeโ€™s picked up coding with AI. Heโ€™s completely re-automated his entire house.โ€ Nothing was resurrected. Nothing had ever died. Andreessen: โ€œโ€ฆin his spare time has generated 500,000 lines of code, just by working with AI.โ€ He never lacked the vision. He lacked the hours. Three decades of wanting with nowhere to put it. Desire doesnโ€™t die when you starve it. It goes quiet, and you start describing it in the past tense. Andreessen: โ€œThe coders that are using AI, the estimate is right now that theyโ€™re 20 times more productive than they were before they started using AI.โ€ Not twenty percent. Twenty times. He draws the pessimistic case from it himself. Andreessen: โ€œIf thereโ€™s only a limited amount of software that people want in the world, then yeah, youโ€™re going to get mass unemployment.โ€ One clause in that sentence holds up the entire automation debate. A limited amount that people want. Every number we have on human demand was taken inside a rationing regime. We measured the ideas that could clear a payroll. Everything beneath that line never existed long enough to be counted. The house that works the way you pictured it. The fix nobody else needs. The idea too small to fund and too personal to sell. We spent a century measuring the supply curve and filed the result under human nature. Nobody alive has ever seen what a person wants. Only what they could afford to want. You were never a person with limits. You were a person with prices. Scarcity was never only a constraint. It was an alibi. It let everyone believe the life they never lived was taken from them. I would have, but. There is no but anymore. The vampires arenโ€™t up all night because the machine demands it. Theyโ€™re up because the thing they always meant to make finally stopped being impossible. You have one too. Youโ€™ve just been describing it in the past tense. That was never a verdict on you. It was a price. The price went to zero.

Dustin

21,263 views โ€ข 1 month ago

The Fog (1980) The Fog had a limited release on February 1, 1980, before expanding nationwide on February 8, 1980. It was originally scheduled for Christmas 1979 but was delayed to avoid heavy competition. The idea for the movie was born during a trip to England when John Carpenter and producer/co-writer Debra Hill visited Stonehenge. Witnessing an eerie mist rolling over the landscape, Carpenter famously asked, "What do you think is in that fog?" He also drew inspiration from the 1958 film The Trollenberg Terror, which featured monsters hiding in clouds. After viewing the initial rough cut, Carpenter was horrified, calling it "terrible" and noting it lacked scares and proper pacing. To save the project, he and Hill spent an additional $200,000 on massive reshoots just a month before the release date. Roughly one-third of the final film consists of reshoots. Key additions include: - The iconic campfire prologue with John Houseman. - The morgue scene where a corpse suddenly reanimates. - Stevie Wayne's lighthouse confrontation with the ghosts (originally, she never encountered them). - Footage of meat hooks and physical contact was added to compete with the rising popularity of "slasher" films. Despite mixed reviews from critics like Roger Ebert, who found the premise weak, the film was a major commercial success. It grossed approximately $21.3 million domestically against a modest $1.1 million budget. The Fog became a staple of the early home video era, first appearing on VHS and Betamax in late 1980. Subsequent high-definition re-releases, including a 4K UHD edition from Scream Factory in 2022, have kept it in the public eye. While initially seen as a "tame" follow-up to Carpenterโ€™s Halloween, it is now revered as a cult classic for its masterclass in building dread. The 1980 originalโ€™s legacy was actually strengthened by the failure of the 2005 remake. The film solidified a unique piece of horror history by featuring Janet Leigh (Psycho) and Jamie Lee Curtis (Halloween) together. This "passing of the torch" between mother and daughter created a legacy of horror royalty that fans still celebrate at conventions today.
2:12

The Fog (1980) The Fog had a limited release on February 1, 1980, before expanding nationwide on February 8, 1980. It was originally scheduled for Christmas 1979 but was delayed to avoid heavy competition. The idea for the movie was born during a trip to England when John Carpenter and producer/co-writer Debra Hill visited Stonehenge. Witnessing an eerie mist rolling over the landscape, Carpenter famously asked, "What do you think is in that fog?" He also drew inspiration from the 1958 film The Trollenberg Terror, which featured monsters hiding in clouds. After viewing the initial rough cut, Carpenter was horrified, calling it "terrible" and noting it lacked scares and proper pacing. To save the project, he and Hill spent an additional $200,000 on massive reshoots just a month before the release date. Roughly one-third of the final film consists of reshoots. Key additions include: - The iconic campfire prologue with John Houseman. - The morgue scene where a corpse suddenly reanimates. - Stevie Wayne's lighthouse confrontation with the ghosts (originally, she never encountered them). - Footage of meat hooks and physical contact was added to compete with the rising popularity of "slasher" films. Despite mixed reviews from critics like Roger Ebert, who found the premise weak, the film was a major commercial success. It grossed approximately $21.3 million domestically against a modest $1.1 million budget. The Fog became a staple of the early home video era, first appearing on VHS and Betamax in late 1980. Subsequent high-definition re-releases, including a 4K UHD edition from Scream Factory in 2022, have kept it in the public eye. While initially seen as a "tame" follow-up to Carpenterโ€™s Halloween, it is now revered as a cult classic for its masterclass in building dread. The 1980 originalโ€™s legacy was actually strengthened by the failure of the 2005 remake. The film solidified a unique piece of horror history by featuring Janet Leigh (Psycho) and Jamie Lee Curtis (Halloween) together. This "passing of the torch" between mother and daughter created a legacy of horror royalty that fans still celebrate at conventions today.

Tom๐Ÿ˜ˆLovesโค๏ธHorror๐Ÿ˜ฑ

15,850 views โ€ข 7 months ago

I might loose some followers on thisโ€ฆ But this is how I treat my portfolio: Like a mf psychopathโ€ฆโ€ฆ I just sold $TE at almost breakeven. Could see it running to $6.18 or $5.19. depending on how it closes today. I REALLY like $TE. Iโ€™m super bullish on energy/power demand. BUTโ€ฆ no matter what argument, I cannot defend 16% allocated to $TE when they just fired their CAO right before earnings with zero explanation. Iโ€™m not buying the โ€œweโ€™re getting a better oneโ€ argument. This excuse has been used for 20 years while *files* keep building up. How did that work? Most important lesson in life: money talks. People will do almost anything for enough money. In hindsight of what files are circulating these days, fraud seems like nothing. I know this is contrarian. And I also KNOW thereโ€™s no proof of it. But this is EXACTLY why itโ€™s critical to have hard rules for your investments. The RISK is on YOU. The reason I watch my portfolio like a psychopath? To minimize loss. To minimize risk. Iโ€™m not betting my hard-earned money. I will NEVER invest in companies with: > Lack of communication > Lack of transparency > Lack of trust I can live with debt. I can live with execution risk. But when management starts shutting out investors or goes radio silent? Just before earningsโ€ฆ Thatโ€™s the biggest RED FLAG to me. We live in 2026. It takes a CEO 5 minutes to post an update on X or record a video. And no, I donโ€™t buy the CEO is busy either. I manage people myself everyday. It comes down to priorities. Itโ€™s not good enough for me. I wish all my fellow $TE the best luck! I sincerely mean that and pray that you all get rich and Iโ€™m mistaken ๐Ÿซถ Iโ€™m out. Watching to re-enter $NBIS or $KRKNF now.
0:40

I might loose some followers on thisโ€ฆ But this is how I treat my portfolio: Like a mf psychopathโ€ฆโ€ฆ I just sold $TE at almost breakeven. Could see it running to $6.18 or $5.19. depending on how it closes today. I REALLY like $TE. Iโ€™m super bullish on energy/power demand. BUTโ€ฆ no matter what argument, I cannot defend 16% allocated to $TE when they just fired their CAO right before earnings with zero explanation. Iโ€™m not buying the โ€œweโ€™re getting a better oneโ€ argument. This excuse has been used for 20 years while *files* keep building up. How did that work? Most important lesson in life: money talks. People will do almost anything for enough money. In hindsight of what files are circulating these days, fraud seems like nothing. I know this is contrarian. And I also KNOW thereโ€™s no proof of it. But this is EXACTLY why itโ€™s critical to have hard rules for your investments. The RISK is on YOU. The reason I watch my portfolio like a psychopath? To minimize loss. To minimize risk. Iโ€™m not betting my hard-earned money. I will NEVER invest in companies with: > Lack of communication > Lack of transparency > Lack of trust I can live with debt. I can live with execution risk. But when management starts shutting out investors or goes radio silent? Just before earningsโ€ฆ Thatโ€™s the biggest RED FLAG to me. We live in 2026. It takes a CEO 5 minutes to post an update on X or record a video. And no, I donโ€™t buy the CEO is busy either. I manage people myself everyday. It comes down to priorities. Itโ€™s not good enough for me. I wish all my fellow $TE the best luck! I sincerely mean that and pray that you all get rich and Iโ€™m mistaken ๐Ÿซถ Iโ€™m out. Watching to re-enter $NBIS or $KRKNF now.

Black Panther Capital

71,384 views โ€ข 6 months ago

Why I have loved STAR TREK since I was 13 years old. This is your TL;DR warning. I didn't fall for TOS, even though I'd seen it a lot in UHF re-runs. I didn't even fall for Wrath of Khan, though I saw it first-run in the theater in 1982โ€”and it's still widely regarded as the best Trek movie for very good reasons. I fell for The Search For Spock. And not because of the contrived way they undid the tragic beauty of the second film's ending. But for the notion of Starfleet as presented on film. Something about the gliding return to Spacedock. Rand standing there shaking her head at the repaired damage to the hull. Kirk, Scotty, and Sulu remarking on the Excelsior. And then (of course) Kirk's ballsy decision to choose loyalty above duty. The theft of the Enterprise. That scene in particular. I never don't get chills with that scene. It still moves me in ways I cannot sufficiently put to words. Anyway, right movie, right moment in my life. I re-watched it endlessly on VHS, then backed up and re-watched Khan and also The Motion Picture. And fell for them in different ways, for different reasons. Have seen all three countless times. Love the original crew mated to 1980s quality film special effects. Love the NCC-1701 refit. And consider it peak Enterprise after all these years. And I went back and rented almost all of TOS from Blockbuster when they had it in VHS. Appreciated the true standout episodes like "The Doomsday Machine" and "Balance of Terror." All of this was hugely impactful on my adolescence. Leaving a mark that's lasted all the way to now. Some people seem to love the idea of the UFP. Especially people on the Leftward side of American politics. Who insist that it's a Socialist utopia. I found it attractive when I was young, for most of the same reasons the Lefties do, but as I got older I realized it was just wishcasting. Especially those TNG scripts with all the snobby, "Your primitive planet is not ready for us evolved and superior Feddies, dear prole!" episodes. Side note: part of what makes Quark great is Quark is the perfect foil taking the air out of the Federation's tires during DS9's run. Some very good writing (and on-the-nose reflection) in those scripts. But Starfleet itself? Remained a wonderful representation of a space navy. I have never not been enamored with it. Yes, some folks consider it too goody-two-shoes for their taste. I can see why. But Starfleetโ€”and especially the TOS crew at motion picture scaleโ€”made me want to *BE* on the Enterprise. They could make me a fobbit POG who never does a single away mission and I wouldn't care. Just being aboard. Being part of that. That's what ignited my 13 year old brain. And kept me going into successive films, and also TNG, and then DS9, and then VOY. The fascination with Starfleet never left me. And while 23+ years of IRL military service has shown me all the mistakes and misguided notionsโ€”especially that moronic "Starfleet is not a military!" stuff certain script people tried desperately to shoe-horn into the plotsโ€”I've never lost my admiration for the idea: a fleet of ships, crewed with the finest the galaxy has to offer, exploring and patrolling the far reaches of interstellar space. Armed for war, they nevertheless go in peace. To seek out and catalogue new solar systems, new planets, new species, new civilizations, Boldly Go, and so forth. What a wonderful idea. It doesn't get old. Not to me. And maybe that's why I get so damned unhappy with Nu Trek Productโ„ข? It cheapens the characters, their service, even the very conceit. Turns it into a gimmick, a parody, or just downright vandalizes Starfleet. I don't hold with that. I refuse it, in fact. And I remember. I remember what it was like to be young, and feel the magic. Ever since Captain Styles pressed the button on his arm rest and said, "Kirk, you do this you'll never sit in the captain's chair again." And Kirk, unblinking, orders, "Warp speed." ๐Ÿ––
2:17

Why I have loved STAR TREK since I was 13 years old. This is your TL;DR warning. I didn't fall for TOS, even though I'd seen it a lot in UHF re-runs. I didn't even fall for Wrath of Khan, though I saw it first-run in the theater in 1982โ€”and it's still widely regarded as the best Trek movie for very good reasons. I fell for The Search For Spock. And not because of the contrived way they undid the tragic beauty of the second film's ending. But for the notion of Starfleet as presented on film. Something about the gliding return to Spacedock. Rand standing there shaking her head at the repaired damage to the hull. Kirk, Scotty, and Sulu remarking on the Excelsior. And then (of course) Kirk's ballsy decision to choose loyalty above duty. The theft of the Enterprise. That scene in particular. I never don't get chills with that scene. It still moves me in ways I cannot sufficiently put to words. Anyway, right movie, right moment in my life. I re-watched it endlessly on VHS, then backed up and re-watched Khan and also The Motion Picture. And fell for them in different ways, for different reasons. Have seen all three countless times. Love the original crew mated to 1980s quality film special effects. Love the NCC-1701 refit. And consider it peak Enterprise after all these years. And I went back and rented almost all of TOS from Blockbuster when they had it in VHS. Appreciated the true standout episodes like "The Doomsday Machine" and "Balance of Terror." All of this was hugely impactful on my adolescence. Leaving a mark that's lasted all the way to now. Some people seem to love the idea of the UFP. Especially people on the Leftward side of American politics. Who insist that it's a Socialist utopia. I found it attractive when I was young, for most of the same reasons the Lefties do, but as I got older I realized it was just wishcasting. Especially those TNG scripts with all the snobby, "Your primitive planet is not ready for us evolved and superior Feddies, dear prole!" episodes. Side note: part of what makes Quark great is Quark is the perfect foil taking the air out of the Federation's tires during DS9's run. Some very good writing (and on-the-nose reflection) in those scripts. But Starfleet itself? Remained a wonderful representation of a space navy. I have never not been enamored with it. Yes, some folks consider it too goody-two-shoes for their taste. I can see why. But Starfleetโ€”and especially the TOS crew at motion picture scaleโ€”made me want to *BE* on the Enterprise. They could make me a fobbit POG who never does a single away mission and I wouldn't care. Just being aboard. Being part of that. That's what ignited my 13 year old brain. And kept me going into successive films, and also TNG, and then DS9, and then VOY. The fascination with Starfleet never left me. And while 23+ years of IRL military service has shown me all the mistakes and misguided notionsโ€”especially that moronic "Starfleet is not a military!" stuff certain script people tried desperately to shoe-horn into the plotsโ€”I've never lost my admiration for the idea: a fleet of ships, crewed with the finest the galaxy has to offer, exploring and patrolling the far reaches of interstellar space. Armed for war, they nevertheless go in peace. To seek out and catalogue new solar systems, new planets, new species, new civilizations, Boldly Go, and so forth. What a wonderful idea. It doesn't get old. Not to me. And maybe that's why I get so damned unhappy with Nu Trek Productโ„ข? It cheapens the characters, their service, even the very conceit. Turns it into a gimmick, a parody, or just downright vandalizes Starfleet. I don't hold with that. I refuse it, in fact. And I remember. I remember what it was like to be young, and feel the magic. Ever since Captain Styles pressed the button on his arm rest and said, "Kirk, you do this you'll never sit in the captain's chair again." And Kirk, unblinking, orders, "Warp speed." ๐Ÿ––

Brad R. Torgersen

92,424 views โ€ข 7 months ago

WHAT YOU'VE HEARD: "MLK was shot with a .30-06 and it didn't leave an exit wound." (๐Ÿ”–Bookmark and share this. Arm yourself with the truth and information) Both of the above claims are false. He wasn't shot with a .30-06 and there was indeed an exit wound. The confusion arises because the fedsloppers are repeating fedslop talking points from a previous conspiracy/cover-up ass*ssination. Peak irony. Garbage in, garbage out. โ–ช๏ธCLAIM 1: "IT DIDN'T LEAVE AN EXIT WOUND"โ–ช๏ธ In 1976-79, the House Select Committee on Assassinations investigated the MLK assassination and determined the following: 1. Dr. Francisco's original autopsy was "DEFICIENT" because he never actually determined the complete bullet wound track. (see attachments below) 2. According to the committee's medical panel reconstruction, the bullet entered, exited & then re-entered according to this track: 1. INITIAL ENTRANCE: right cheek/face. The entrance was approximately 1 inch to the right and ยฝ inch below the corner of the mouth. 2. After passing through the cheek, the bullet struck and shattered the right jawbone. 3. EXIT: The bullet then exited through the bottom portion of the right side of the chin, LEAVING THE BODY. 4. Before re-entering the body, the bullet crossed through the upper-neck clothing. MLK's shirt collar was perforated and torn, his tie was completely torn in half, and the suit jacket lapel was struck tangentially in its edge, tearing the inner lining. 5. SECONDARY RE-ENTRY: The bullet re-entered the base of the neck just above the right collarbone. 6. From the neck re-entry, the bullet continued right-to-left, front-to-back, and downward, injuring the jugular vein, carotid artery, subclavian artery, and vertebral artery. 7. Additional soft-tissue injuries included a submucosal hemorrhage of the larynx and an intrapulmonary hematoma at the top of the right upper lung as consequences of being adjacent to the wound path, but they were not penetrated by the bullet itself. 8. As the bullet continued leftward/backward, the first and second ribsโ€”particularly their posterior portions near where they join the spineโ€”were fractured and displaced. 9. There was extensive destruction of bone around the lowest cervical and upper thoracic vertebrae, corresponding to C7 and T1, and there was a major, corresponding devastating spinal-cord injury. 10. The remaining bullet fragment continued into the left upper back and stopped just beneath the skin, approximately 3 inches left of the spinal midline. IOW, it very nearly exited the body a 2nd time. BULLET PATH & DAMAGE SUMMARY: Right cheek entrance โ†’ fractured right jaw โ†’ mouth โ†’ lower-right chin exit โ†’ shirt collar + tie + jacket lapel edge damage โ†’ neck re-entry above right clavicle โ†’ jugular vein + carotid/subclavian/vertebral arteries + major nerves โ†’ posterior 1st/2nd ribs โ†’ C7/T1 spinal column โ†’ severe spinal-cord injury โ†’ left upper back subcutaneous termination. So the bullet entered, hit one of the strongest bones in the body, EXITED, then re-entered, did a ton more damage, and nearly exited again. But even that's not the whole story. โ–ช๏ธCLAIM #2: "HE WAS SHOT WITH A .30-06"โ–ช๏ธ Let's review the alleged murder weapon & bullet. 1. The *FBI tested the Remington 760 Gamemasterโ€”the alleged murder weaponโ€”and found its sighting to be off by 3 inches TO THE RIGHT and down about an inch. This is important because the Select Committee found that the fatal bullet struck King nearly STRAIGHT ON to the RIGHT SIDE of his face. Did James Earl Ray aim to the left of King's head? Absurd. If he'd aimed for center head, it should have hit King 3 inches over to the right on the LEFT SIDE of his face, but it didn't. It him over to the left, on the right side of his face. (*Assuming the FBI can even be trusted, since it was spying on MLK, and helped spring James Earl Ray from jail to set him up as patsy. The DOJ has never released these files or the targets from the "test" to support its claim). 2. Surprise! Complete ballistics were never originally performed on the death slug. Only enough to claim that the death slug was "consistent" with a round of 30-06 ammunition. (sound familiar?) The ballistics evidence at that point couldn't exclude or affirm the gun as the murder weapon (again, sound familiar?) However, as the last judge overseeing the case before James Earl Ray died, Joe Brown finally ordered full ballistics testing performed. It was then found that the death slug did NOT match the Remington 760 Gamemaster: The death slug had a rifling twist of 1 turn per 11.25 inches. The alleged murder weapon (the Remington 760 Gamemaster) had a rifling twist of 1 turn per 10 inches plus a bad manufacturing defect not found on the death slug, thereby excluding the gun as the murder weapon. (see video below) 3. Of secondary importance, the death slug did not metallurgically match 4 of the 5 unfired .30-06 rounds left in the drop bundle along with the gun. The compromised FBI acknowledges this mismatch, but says "Not so fast, none of the 4 unspent rounds match each other, either, but the 5th round is consistent with the death slug." IOW, the FBI's position was: the 4 rounds don't match each other, so this test isn't meaningful, except when there is a match to the 5th round, then it's meaningful. lol 4. Judge Brown asserts the death slug was actually a special subsonic NATO 7.62 round shot from an XM-21 rifle with a suppressor to slow the projectile down to less than supersonic velocity. (see video below) As I said above, the death slug was determined to be "consistent with" a .30-06. Well, 7.62 & .30-06 are indeed the same diameter. So a 7.62 slug will "be consistent with" a .30-06 slug, especially after the amount of degradation seen on the King slug (it lost about 2/3 of its material along the wound track). Furthermore, subsonic 7.62 ammunition is designed to travel around only 1,000 fps, rather than the standard round's speed of about 2,800 fps. The astute will realize that such a reduced velocity will have far less destructive power and penetrating forceโ€”which helps explain why the slug that hit MLK only exited once and then pinballed around a bit after it re-entered his body, lacking the penetrating power to exit a 2nd time. 5. After allegedly shooting MLK, the Remington 760 Gamemaster, the unspent bullets, the alleged spent shell casing from the alleged death shot, and all of his possessions (including pliers & a tack hammerโ€”just missing a screwdriver!) were allegedly dropped in a nice, neat bundle wrapped in a blanket by James Earl Ray in the doorway of Canipe's Amusements just before he reached his car for the perfect getaway. Doesn't that all just sound convenient and familiar? 'Yes, I got away clean, but first Ima leave all this stuff behind to incriminate myself.' (see attachment below) Doesn't that sound like someone else who left the gun & unspent bullets wrapped in a nice bundle in a towel before reaching his car fire a clean gateway? A gun that BTW can't be matched to the alleged death bulletโ€”but is "consistent" with it! It's like there's a playbook for these set-ups. Lol. Lmfao. Why hasn't the FBI released Tyler Robinson's Mauser back to the state of Utah? Has its sighting been tested after Tyler allegedly stuffed it in his pants and walked it all over campus? Why hasn't the FBI made it available to Tyler's defense for examination and testing? What are they afraid of? ********** In the 1999 civil trial verdict, a jury was allowed to examine much of this evidence (and more) in a court of law for the first time. Based on what I've summarized here and other voluminous evidence & testimony, the jury determined that King was assassinated by Loyd Jowers and a government conspiracy/cover-up. That is the ONLY OFFICIAL FINDING from a court of law in this case. Yet these dolts and sloppers continue to spread the fedslop narrative from MLK's case in order to affirm the fedslop narrative in the Charlie Kirk case. Garbage in, garbage out. How compromised do you have to be to not only pledge your allegiance to the fedslop now, but also to a 58-year old fedslop narrative that was already negated by a court of law 27 years ago? Lol
3:19

WHAT YOU'VE HEARD: "MLK was shot with a .30-06 and it didn't leave an exit wound." (๐Ÿ”–Bookmark and share this. Arm yourself with the truth and information) Both of the above claims are false. He wasn't shot with a .30-06 and there was indeed an exit wound. The confusion arises because the fedsloppers are repeating fedslop talking points from a previous conspiracy/cover-up ass*ssination. Peak irony. Garbage in, garbage out. โ–ช๏ธCLAIM 1: "IT DIDN'T LEAVE AN EXIT WOUND"โ–ช๏ธ In 1976-79, the House Select Committee on Assassinations investigated the MLK assassination and determined the following: 1. Dr. Francisco's original autopsy was "DEFICIENT" because he never actually determined the complete bullet wound track. (see attachments below) 2. According to the committee's medical panel reconstruction, the bullet entered, exited & then re-entered according to this track: 1. INITIAL ENTRANCE: right cheek/face. The entrance was approximately 1 inch to the right and ยฝ inch below the corner of the mouth. 2. After passing through the cheek, the bullet struck and shattered the right jawbone. 3. EXIT: The bullet then exited through the bottom portion of the right side of the chin, LEAVING THE BODY. 4. Before re-entering the body, the bullet crossed through the upper-neck clothing. MLK's shirt collar was perforated and torn, his tie was completely torn in half, and the suit jacket lapel was struck tangentially in its edge, tearing the inner lining. 5. SECONDARY RE-ENTRY: The bullet re-entered the base of the neck just above the right collarbone. 6. From the neck re-entry, the bullet continued right-to-left, front-to-back, and downward, injuring the jugular vein, carotid artery, subclavian artery, and vertebral artery. 7. Additional soft-tissue injuries included a submucosal hemorrhage of the larynx and an intrapulmonary hematoma at the top of the right upper lung as consequences of being adjacent to the wound path, but they were not penetrated by the bullet itself. 8. As the bullet continued leftward/backward, the first and second ribsโ€”particularly their posterior portions near where they join the spineโ€”were fractured and displaced. 9. There was extensive destruction of bone around the lowest cervical and upper thoracic vertebrae, corresponding to C7 and T1, and there was a major, corresponding devastating spinal-cord injury. 10. The remaining bullet fragment continued into the left upper back and stopped just beneath the skin, approximately 3 inches left of the spinal midline. IOW, it very nearly exited the body a 2nd time. BULLET PATH & DAMAGE SUMMARY: Right cheek entrance โ†’ fractured right jaw โ†’ mouth โ†’ lower-right chin exit โ†’ shirt collar + tie + jacket lapel edge damage โ†’ neck re-entry above right clavicle โ†’ jugular vein + carotid/subclavian/vertebral arteries + major nerves โ†’ posterior 1st/2nd ribs โ†’ C7/T1 spinal column โ†’ severe spinal-cord injury โ†’ left upper back subcutaneous termination. So the bullet entered, hit one of the strongest bones in the body, EXITED, then re-entered, did a ton more damage, and nearly exited again. But even that's not the whole story. โ–ช๏ธCLAIM #2: "HE WAS SHOT WITH A .30-06"โ–ช๏ธ Let's review the alleged murder weapon & bullet. 1. The *FBI tested the Remington 760 Gamemasterโ€”the alleged murder weaponโ€”and found its sighting to be off by 3 inches TO THE RIGHT and down about an inch. This is important because the Select Committee found that the fatal bullet struck King nearly STRAIGHT ON to the RIGHT SIDE of his face. Did James Earl Ray aim to the left of King's head? Absurd. If he'd aimed for center head, it should have hit King 3 inches over to the right on the LEFT SIDE of his face, but it didn't. It him over to the left, on the right side of his face. (*Assuming the FBI can even be trusted, since it was spying on MLK, and helped spring James Earl Ray from jail to set him up as patsy. The DOJ has never released these files or the targets from the "test" to support its claim). 2. Surprise! Complete ballistics were never originally performed on the death slug. Only enough to claim that the death slug was "consistent" with a round of 30-06 ammunition. (sound familiar?) The ballistics evidence at that point couldn't exclude or affirm the gun as the murder weapon (again, sound familiar?) However, as the last judge overseeing the case before James Earl Ray died, Joe Brown finally ordered full ballistics testing performed. It was then found that the death slug did NOT match the Remington 760 Gamemaster: The death slug had a rifling twist of 1 turn per 11.25 inches. The alleged murder weapon (the Remington 760 Gamemaster) had a rifling twist of 1 turn per 10 inches plus a bad manufacturing defect not found on the death slug, thereby excluding the gun as the murder weapon. (see video below) 3. Of secondary importance, the death slug did not metallurgically match 4 of the 5 unfired .30-06 rounds left in the drop bundle along with the gun. The compromised FBI acknowledges this mismatch, but says "Not so fast, none of the 4 unspent rounds match each other, either, but the 5th round is consistent with the death slug." IOW, the FBI's position was: the 4 rounds don't match each other, so this test isn't meaningful, except when there is a match to the 5th round, then it's meaningful. lol 4. Judge Brown asserts the death slug was actually a special subsonic NATO 7.62 round shot from an XM-21 rifle with a suppressor to slow the projectile down to less than supersonic velocity. (see video below) As I said above, the death slug was determined to be "consistent with" a .30-06. Well, 7.62 & .30-06 are indeed the same diameter. So a 7.62 slug will "be consistent with" a .30-06 slug, especially after the amount of degradation seen on the King slug (it lost about 2/3 of its material along the wound track). Furthermore, subsonic 7.62 ammunition is designed to travel around only 1,000 fps, rather than the standard round's speed of about 2,800 fps. The astute will realize that such a reduced velocity will have far less destructive power and penetrating forceโ€”which helps explain why the slug that hit MLK only exited once and then pinballed around a bit after it re-entered his body, lacking the penetrating power to exit a 2nd time. 5. After allegedly shooting MLK, the Remington 760 Gamemaster, the unspent bullets, the alleged spent shell casing from the alleged death shot, and all of his possessions (including pliers & a tack hammerโ€”just missing a screwdriver!) were allegedly dropped in a nice, neat bundle wrapped in a blanket by James Earl Ray in the doorway of Canipe's Amusements just before he reached his car for the perfect getaway. Doesn't that all just sound convenient and familiar? 'Yes, I got away clean, but first Ima leave all this stuff behind to incriminate myself.' (see attachment below) Doesn't that sound like someone else who left the gun & unspent bullets wrapped in a nice bundle in a towel before reaching his car fire a clean gateway? A gun that BTW can't be matched to the alleged death bulletโ€”but is "consistent" with it! It's like there's a playbook for these set-ups. Lol. Lmfao. Why hasn't the FBI released Tyler Robinson's Mauser back to the state of Utah? Has its sighting been tested after Tyler allegedly stuffed it in his pants and walked it all over campus? Why hasn't the FBI made it available to Tyler's defense for examination and testing? What are they afraid of? ********** In the 1999 civil trial verdict, a jury was allowed to examine much of this evidence (and more) in a court of law for the first time. Based on what I've summarized here and other voluminous evidence & testimony, the jury determined that King was assassinated by Loyd Jowers and a government conspiracy/cover-up. That is the ONLY OFFICIAL FINDING from a court of law in this case. Yet these dolts and sloppers continue to spread the fedslop narrative from MLK's case in order to affirm the fedslop narrative in the Charlie Kirk case. Garbage in, garbage out. How compromised do you have to be to not only pledge your allegiance to the fedslop now, but also to a 58-year old fedslop narrative that was already negated by a court of law 27 years ago? Lol

Sam Parker ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿงฏ

68,632 views โ€ข 12 days ago

What's this? John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial witness Jen McCabe DID tell a grand jury that Karen said "I hit him! I hit him! I hit him!" at the scene where Karen is alleged to have struck John, while drunk-driving, and then left John to die in the snow? This is bad news heading into the end of Alan Jackson's cross on Friday (there is no court today). Jackson spent hours going in circles on Wednesday as to whether McCabe had told a grand jury about Karen's confession to "hitting John" and now the world gets an early preview of prosecutor Hank Brennan's re-direct via the video below (where Brennan will, no doubt, have McCabe confirm she told the Grand Jury those very words as to Karen's confession to hitting John). See video of McCabe testifying, on direct, that Karen said the words "I hit him! I hit him! I hit him!" on the scene of John's death, leaving jurors stunned - Although McCabe did not recall, when being asked by Jackson, if she gave such testimony to the grand jury, McCabe was able to recall that information on re-direct during testimony in the first Karen Read and John O'Keefe trial (which I have clipped and included below). Furthermore, Brennan has also announced in open court that, at the conclusion of McCabe's testimony, Brennan will be playing videos of Karen's own remarks for the jury, wherein Karen apparently talks about getting into an argument with John O'Keefe in the moments leading up to 12:32:16am ET on 1/29/22 (the moment Karen is alleged to have backed up her Lexus, with a BAC between 0.13 and 0.29, struck John and then left him to die in a blizzard on a lawn). See video of Brennan confirming in open court that those videos --where Karen talks about an argument with John during his last moments-- will be played for jurors, at the close of McCabe's testimony and after she is off the stand, here - Karen's argument with John, between 12:24am and 12:31am, was apparently about a woman John had dated years earlier ("Bella's mom"). McCabe has already testified, during Read's re-trial, that McCabe mentioned Bella's mom as a way to help Karen and John find their way to a house party in the moments before John was allegedly struck and killed by Karen's car. McCabe further testified that, for some reason, Karen started talking about Bella's mom, and John "cheating on Karen," in the moments before John's body was discovered by Karen, McCabe and Kerry Roberts after 6am on 1/29/22. See McCabe's testimony about Karen being upset about Bella's mom, from earlier this week in the Read re-trial, here - Karen, herself, had been cheating on John in the weeks leading up to this death, and John had expressed to Karen that the relationship had run it's course. Karen, for her part, felt John's adopted, double-orphaned, niece and nephew were putting a strain on the relationship. See text messages, from Karen herself, confirming she tried to cheat on John, in his own home, with John's friend (only for John's friend to shut the affair down when that friend realized Karen was trying to emotionally abuse John by way of that affair) here - That argument about Bella's mom (although not it's content) between Karen and John was also relayed, by Karen, to first responders when Karen was on the way to the hospital after 6am the next morning (Karen's parents had her sectioned due to threats of self-harm, and that is how Karen's blood was taken, thus confirming Karen was drunk at the time she allegedly backed into John and left him to die). See video of a firefighter/EMT confirming Karen made those statements about Karen's last words to John being an argument, in the moments leading up to 12:32:16am on 1/29/22, here - Jurors have already seen video of Karen confessing, to a documentary crew, to being too drunk to drive that morning (Karen's BAC was 2-4 times the legal limit of 0.08) and, shocking, a video of Karen mocking John's mother, Peggy, after Peggy told Karen, on the morning of 1/29/22, that John "looked like he got hit by a car." Watch video of Karen ruthlessly mocking Peggy O'Keefe here - Watch videos, played for jurors, of Karen admitting to being too drunk to drive in the moments before John O'Keefe was allegedly struck by Karen's car here - Jackson's cross, in some ways, was ill-fated before it began. Ian Whiffin, a world-renowned cell phone data expert and software coder from Cellebrite, confirmed for jurors that Jen McCabe's Google searches for "how long to die in cold", done at Karen Read's request while at the scene of John's death, occurred at 6:23am and 6:23am on 1/29/22. Watch video of that confirmation, which devastated Karen and her legal team, here - Wiffin also confirmed that John O'Keefe's phone never moved from the lawn of Fairview Road, based on GPS and temperature data, between 12:32:16am and after 6am on 1/29/22 (when John was found). See that testimony here - In turn, Friday should be a very bad day for Karen Read's defense. I'll be with you early tomorrow morning, as always, to provide special Towel Multi-Cam coverage --including the world famous Karen Cam-- via this link -
2:08

What's this? John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial witness Jen McCabe DID tell a grand jury that Karen said "I hit him! I hit him! I hit him!" at the scene where Karen is alleged to have struck John, while drunk-driving, and then left John to die in the snow? This is bad news heading into the end of Alan Jackson's cross on Friday (there is no court today). Jackson spent hours going in circles on Wednesday as to whether McCabe had told a grand jury about Karen's confession to "hitting John" and now the world gets an early preview of prosecutor Hank Brennan's re-direct via the video below (where Brennan will, no doubt, have McCabe confirm she told the Grand Jury those very words as to Karen's confession to hitting John). See video of McCabe testifying, on direct, that Karen said the words "I hit him! I hit him! I hit him!" on the scene of John's death, leaving jurors stunned - Although McCabe did not recall, when being asked by Jackson, if she gave such testimony to the grand jury, McCabe was able to recall that information on re-direct during testimony in the first Karen Read and John O'Keefe trial (which I have clipped and included below). Furthermore, Brennan has also announced in open court that, at the conclusion of McCabe's testimony, Brennan will be playing videos of Karen's own remarks for the jury, wherein Karen apparently talks about getting into an argument with John O'Keefe in the moments leading up to 12:32:16am ET on 1/29/22 (the moment Karen is alleged to have backed up her Lexus, with a BAC between 0.13 and 0.29, struck John and then left him to die in a blizzard on a lawn). See video of Brennan confirming in open court that those videos --where Karen talks about an argument with John during his last moments-- will be played for jurors, at the close of McCabe's testimony and after she is off the stand, here - Karen's argument with John, between 12:24am and 12:31am, was apparently about a woman John had dated years earlier ("Bella's mom"). McCabe has already testified, during Read's re-trial, that McCabe mentioned Bella's mom as a way to help Karen and John find their way to a house party in the moments before John was allegedly struck and killed by Karen's car. McCabe further testified that, for some reason, Karen started talking about Bella's mom, and John "cheating on Karen," in the moments before John's body was discovered by Karen, McCabe and Kerry Roberts after 6am on 1/29/22. See McCabe's testimony about Karen being upset about Bella's mom, from earlier this week in the Read re-trial, here - Karen, herself, had been cheating on John in the weeks leading up to this death, and John had expressed to Karen that the relationship had run it's course. Karen, for her part, felt John's adopted, double-orphaned, niece and nephew were putting a strain on the relationship. See text messages, from Karen herself, confirming she tried to cheat on John, in his own home, with John's friend (only for John's friend to shut the affair down when that friend realized Karen was trying to emotionally abuse John by way of that affair) here - That argument about Bella's mom (although not it's content) between Karen and John was also relayed, by Karen, to first responders when Karen was on the way to the hospital after 6am the next morning (Karen's parents had her sectioned due to threats of self-harm, and that is how Karen's blood was taken, thus confirming Karen was drunk at the time she allegedly backed into John and left him to die). See video of a firefighter/EMT confirming Karen made those statements about Karen's last words to John being an argument, in the moments leading up to 12:32:16am on 1/29/22, here - Jurors have already seen video of Karen confessing, to a documentary crew, to being too drunk to drive that morning (Karen's BAC was 2-4 times the legal limit of 0.08) and, shocking, a video of Karen mocking John's mother, Peggy, after Peggy told Karen, on the morning of 1/29/22, that John "looked like he got hit by a car." Watch video of Karen ruthlessly mocking Peggy O'Keefe here - Watch videos, played for jurors, of Karen admitting to being too drunk to drive in the moments before John O'Keefe was allegedly struck by Karen's car here - Jackson's cross, in some ways, was ill-fated before it began. Ian Whiffin, a world-renowned cell phone data expert and software coder from Cellebrite, confirmed for jurors that Jen McCabe's Google searches for "how long to die in cold", done at Karen Read's request while at the scene of John's death, occurred at 6:23am and 6:23am on 1/29/22. Watch video of that confirmation, which devastated Karen and her legal team, here - Wiffin also confirmed that John O'Keefe's phone never moved from the lawn of Fairview Road, based on GPS and temperature data, between 12:32:16am and after 6am on 1/29/22 (when John was found). See that testimony here - In turn, Friday should be a very bad day for Karen Read's defense. I'll be with you early tomorrow morning, as always, to provide special Towel Multi-Cam coverage --including the world famous Karen Cam-- via this link -

Grant Smith Ellis

22,211 views โ€ข 1 year ago