Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
Tall fine lightskin 🏀 🥷🏾 pulled up the other day for some throat after practice 🤤🤤#dmvfreaks #nycfreaks #atlfreaks #bbc #memphisfreaks #chicagofreaks #htxfreaks #ohiofreaks #901freaks #757freaks #throatgoat #nsfwtwtًً
61,108 views • 6 months ago •via X (Twitter)
0 Comments
No comments available
Comments from the original post will appear here
Related Videos
1:28
Sensitive content
Man Falsely Accused of Possessing Explicit Child Content by Target Employee. Stress Helps Leads to His Death. A Multnomah County Circuit Court jury in Oregon has ordered Target to pay $150,000 to the estate of Jeffrey Buckmeyer after deciding that a store employee’s report about seeing inappropriate photos on the customer’s phone was false and caused serious harm. Buckmeyer, a 43-year-old Portland-area man with no criminal record, walked into the Target at 9009 SW Hall Blvd in Tigard in July 2018 looking for help freeing up storage on his iPhone. He had photos from his side eBay business saved on it and asked the electronics counter worker for assistance deleting a large folder. According to court documents and coverage from OregonLive, the employee instead told management and later police that he saw roughly 15 to 20 pictures of naked girls who looked about 10 years old or younger, from different ethnic backgrounds, with some of them tied up. The worker also claimed Buckmeyer appeared in some of the images with visible signs of arousal. Target staff pulled the customer’s information from a credit card purchase and license plate video from the parking lot camera, then contacted law enforcement. The FBI launched an investigation. Agents detained Buckmeyer in the parking lot of his Tigard apartment complex, handcuffed him, searched his home, and took his phone along with other electronics. The probe dragged on for months, and word of it spread to his landlord, business partners, and extended family. It also limited the time he could spend with his young daughter. Forensics experts later examined the devices and found zero evidence of explicit material or anything like what the employee described. The FBI closed the case without filing charges and returned everything. Independent experts who testified at trial described the phones as completely clean and showing no indication of interest in that kind of content. Buckmeyer already dealt with a pre-existing heart condition. The stress from the accusation and investigation made things worse. He died of cardiac arrest in April 2019. His girlfriend, Patty Anselmo, the mother of his daughter, said the ordeal weighed heavily on him and appeared to speed up his decline. Buckmeyer’s estate filed the civil lawsuit in 2019, naming Target and the unnamed employee as defendants. The suit claimed the false report led to intentional infliction of emotional distress. After a five-day trial that wrapped up recently, the jury sided with the family a few days ago and awarded $150,000 specifically for the emotional harm. The money will go to Buckmeyer’s daughter. Attorney Michael Fuller, who handled the case, told reporters the verdict fulfilled Buckmeyer’s dying wish to clear his name and hold the company responsible.
Robbie Harvey
45,763 views • 3 months ago
1:31
Sensitive content
It's not uncommon for teens to develop an interest in politics/philosophy/religion/cultural issues. You know this because your son is on the server, you fucking idiot. You've been on the server at least 4-5 times to debate some of those teens during AMAs about a wide variety of issues. You absolutely knew many of them were minors at the time you debated them in the server while streaming to your audience. You've debated other content creators - who were minors - on your stream countless times over the last decade. They all had their own communities - full of minors. Don't you feel at least a little weird about trying these attacks? You were just outed by one of your closest friends for doing ageplay -- AGAIN. You received CSAM as jerkoff material and when the minor was later located you pulled up her kiwifarms thread with her dox and underage photos ON YOUR STREAM. You've gone on in detail about how you found and scrolled through countless images and videos of minors engaged in sexual acts on twitter - THEN POSTED THE HASHTAG YOU FOUND IT ON IN YOUR CHAT. You giggled like a bitch while talking about the good old days when you and your other adult friends trolled a child into pulling out his dick on camera for you while his brother, who you knew so well you had a nickname for him, was on stream shirtless for you. You hang out with a proud pedophile, who has groaned on and on about wanting to wrap herself around a 12 year old and jerking off to cartoon kids, and call that pedophile your only true defender. Are you starting to understand the difference? When we find minors being groomed by predators in our community, we immediately involve the parents, the platform, and the authorities. Then we publicly name and shame them so everyone knows what they are. When you found a minor being groomed by a predator, you helped kiwifarms dox her because you couldn't. I turn CSAM over to the authorities so they can arrest the perpetrators and protect the minors. You recorded yourself blowing hot loads to it. We are not the same. I don't think it's reasonable to punish teens with an interest in learning about these topics because the internet is full of people like you. Also -- Yes, my father had an extremely outdated sense of masculinity and machismo. I grew up very rough. I was not a sheltered suburban boy like you. When I was a child, my friend's older brother and his friend were murdered in a drive by while I was near the car they were parked in. One was killed instantly. I watched the other bleed out and die. Many of my family members and friends were killed by gang violence when I was young. My father thought the best way to help me absorb this was a crude form of exposure therapy. Why is this relevant? Do you think it has impacted my ability to process emotion? I mean -- Probably. Very likely. I think I do just fine though. Would it be relevant for me to bring up your dementia-addled grandmother strangling puppies you'd grown to love after blaming them when she'd piss on the floor? Would it be relevant to bring up the fact you were raped as a child? Have those and other traumas probably impacted your ability to process emotion? Probably. Clearly, you are not doing just fine. Was this just a lazy attempt at a dig or did you intend to go somewhere with the childhood thing?
Dooby
84,383 views • 3 months ago
