Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Technology is going too far. This is a Amazon connected Smart Sink Faucet You can say things like “Alexa, will 1 cup of water” But the time it takes to say this, wait for Alexa to respond, and then perform the confirmation task to start filling you could have... show more

Wall Street Apes

1,376,546 subscribers

91,559 views • 8 days ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

“A ship doesn’t sink because of the water around. A ship will sink because of the water that get in. I’m not going to allow the water that is outside to get into my ship and sink it.” — Burna Boy says.

“A ship doesn’t sink because of the water around. A ship will sink because of the water that get in. I’m not going to allow the water that is outside to get into my ship and sink it.” — Burna Boy says.

𝐀𝐬𝐚𝐤𝐲𝐆𝐑𝐍

79,483 views • 5 months ago

I asked Garry Tan how to use meta prompting to get better at AI: "My partners at YC Jared Friedman and Pete Koomen showed me how to do this. You can take almost anything that you do all the time and just drop it into a context window. And then say, “Here’s a bunch of inputs and outputs." And maybe you also add a bunch of notes. And then you tell it, “Write me a prompt that can act as an agent that takes this input and makes this output over here.” You can do this for almost any type of knowledge work. And you can even introspect. "What are things you notice that I did to convert this from the input to the output?”. And then you can just start using the prompt. Initially, it’s going to suck. Because it’s just not that smart yet. But what’s funny is now, I also use it to Iterate my writing. You can be very direct, "I would never say that", "Don’t say it like this", or "Oh, you used the long word there, use the short word". Just speak to it conversationally. And then when you're happy with the output, you can use that new output to make a new prompt. "Based on this conversation, give me a better initial prompt that incorporates all the things we talked about." And you can do this with literally everything. And in theory, there’s so much it applies to that people do day-to-day. You could use it for tweets. You could use it for editing podcasts. You can use it for pretty much everything. I have a folder of prompts that I use all the time. My YouTube prompt is on v27 or something. I'll go through this process with all the different max models. I'll use GPT 5.2 Pro. I’ll use Grok. I'll use Claude. Then, I’ll take all the outputs from all the models and put them into Claude and say "Here’s my prompt, here’s the output from four LLMs, including yourself. Rate each response and tell me what the pros and cons of each approach are." And I usually say "give it to me in numbered form". And then you can agree with one, disagree with two, tell it three is this or that. And then after that, you say given all of this, synthesize it."

I asked Garry Tan how to use meta prompting to get better at AI: "My partners at YC Jared Friedman and Pete Koomen showed me how to do this. You can take almost anything that you do all the time and just drop it into a context window. And then say, “Here’s a bunch of inputs and outputs." And maybe you also add a bunch of notes. And then you tell it, “Write me a prompt that can act as an agent that takes this input and makes this output over here.” You can do this for almost any type of knowledge work. And you can even introspect. "What are things you notice that I did to convert this from the input to the output?”. And then you can just start using the prompt. Initially, it’s going to suck. Because it’s just not that smart yet. But what’s funny is now, I also use it to Iterate my writing. You can be very direct, "I would never say that", "Don’t say it like this", or "Oh, you used the long word there, use the short word". Just speak to it conversationally. And then when you're happy with the output, you can use that new output to make a new prompt. "Based on this conversation, give me a better initial prompt that incorporates all the things we talked about." And you can do this with literally everything. And in theory, there’s so much it applies to that people do day-to-day. You could use it for tweets. You could use it for editing podcasts. You can use it for pretty much everything. I have a folder of prompts that I use all the time. My YouTube prompt is on v27 or something. I'll go through this process with all the different max models. I'll use GPT 5.2 Pro. I’ll use Grok. I'll use Claude. Then, I’ll take all the outputs from all the models and put them into Claude and say "Here’s my prompt, here’s the output from four LLMs, including yourself. Rate each response and tell me what the pros and cons of each approach are." And I usually say "give it to me in numbered form". And then you can agree with one, disagree with two, tell it three is this or that. And then after that, you say given all of this, synthesize it."

The Peel

51,632 views • 4 months ago

How will we know if an AI take over is imminent? What are the warning signs? Connor Leahy: “Things will seem mostly normal, just… weird. Things will get weirder…and weirder… and then one day, we will just not be in control anymore. “There won't be a fight. There won't be a war. It won't be dramatic. It will just be that one day the machines are in control, and not us.” “The way I expect [AI take over] to feel is like, if you play chess against a grandmaster, it doesn’t feel like you're having a heroic battle against the Terminator…. it doesn’t feel like you're having this incredible back and forth, and then you lose... No, it feels more like you THINK you're playing well, you think everything is okay, and then suddenly… you lose… in one move, and you don't know why. This is what it feels like to play chess against a grandmaster, and this is what it's going to feel like for humanity to play against AGI. It won’t be some dramatic battle where the Terminators rise up and try to destroy humanity. No, it will be… things get more and more confusing. [Editor's note: Like Sam Altman, out of nowhere, raising up to 10% of world GDP?] More and more jobs get automated faster and faster... More and more technology gets built, which no one even quite knows how the technology works... There will be mass media movements that don't really make any sense... Like, do we really know the truth of what's going on in the world right now, even now with social media? Do you or I really know what's going on? How much of this is fake? How much of it is generated with AI or other methods? We don't know. And this will get much worse.” Imagine if you have extremely intelligent systems, much smarter than humans, that can generate any image, any video, anything, trying to manipulate you well...and being able to develop new technologies to interfere with politics.”

How will we know if an AI take over is imminent? What are the warning signs? Connor Leahy: “Things will seem mostly normal, just… weird. Things will get weirder…and weirder… and then one day, we will just not be in control anymore. “There won't be a fight. There won't be a war. It won't be dramatic. It will just be that one day the machines are in control, and not us.” “The way I expect [AI take over] to feel is like, if you play chess against a grandmaster, it doesn’t feel like you're having a heroic battle against the Terminator…. it doesn’t feel like you're having this incredible back and forth, and then you lose... No, it feels more like you THINK you're playing well, you think everything is okay, and then suddenly… you lose… in one move, and you don't know why. This is what it feels like to play chess against a grandmaster, and this is what it's going to feel like for humanity to play against AGI. It won’t be some dramatic battle where the Terminators rise up and try to destroy humanity. No, it will be… things get more and more confusing. [Editor's note: Like Sam Altman, out of nowhere, raising up to 10% of world GDP?] More and more jobs get automated faster and faster... More and more technology gets built, which no one even quite knows how the technology works... There will be mass media movements that don't really make any sense... Like, do we really know the truth of what's going on in the world right now, even now with social media? Do you or I really know what's going on? How much of this is fake? How much of it is generated with AI or other methods? We don't know. And this will get much worse.” Imagine if you have extremely intelligent systems, much smarter than humans, that can generate any image, any video, anything, trying to manipulate you well...and being able to develop new technologies to interfere with politics.”

AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️

183,443 views • 2 years ago

I have seen this video in many WhatsApp groups, and many of you sent it to me too. The solution to this problem is for Mnangagwa’s Government to license Starlink and open up the market. But will that happen? Old technology is expensive to run, new technology makes things cheaper. Without Starlink the price of data will remain ridiculously high because of less competition and of course the economy is in a free fall too.

I have seen this video in many WhatsApp groups, and many of you sent it to me too. The solution to this problem is for Mnangagwa’s Government to license Starlink and open up the market. But will that happen? Old technology is expensive to run, new technology makes things cheaper. Without Starlink the price of data will remain ridiculously high because of less competition and of course the economy is in a free fall too.

Hopewell Chin’ono

121,113 views • 2 years ago

No pain like it, it's one thing to have your own heartbreak, but to see your son next to you, inconsolable, knowing there is nothing you can say or do to make things better, is the worst Will take a lot to get over this one, eventually, we all will, and then go again next season

No pain like it, it's one thing to have your own heartbreak, but to see your son next to you, inconsolable, knowing there is nothing you can say or do to make things better, is the worst Will take a lot to get over this one, eventually, we all will, and then go again next season

Lewis Thompson

15,821 views • 1 month ago

BREAKING: President Trump just announced that he will force Gavin Newsom to redirect water from the Klamath River into California cities instead of dumping it into the Pacific, which would stop all the fires. "This is a true tragedy, and it's a mistake of the governor, and you could say the [Biden] administration." It's just common sense. The water is there. USE IT instead of trying to save a bunch of floppy fish.

BREAKING: President Trump just announced that he will force Gavin Newsom to redirect water from the Klamath River into California cities instead of dumping it into the Pacific, which would stop all the fires. "This is a true tragedy, and it's a mistake of the governor, and you could say the [Biden] administration." It's just common sense. The water is there. USE IT instead of trying to save a bunch of floppy fish.

George

3,335,835 views • 1 year ago

This is a long video (15 mns), but is one I would advise every American to make the time to listen to what Bernie Sanders has to say, because the world is sleepwalking into a societal earthquake that will change millions of lives and NOT for the better unless governments regulate the structural damage it could do. This is a vitality important issue to understand and regulate. As someone who works with it and understands its potential, I don’t think people understand just what a societal impact this technology will have. It will be the technology equivalent to shipping manufacturing to China in the 1970s on steroids and that’s just the beginning. The U.S. has bet the house on winning the AI tech stack race and I think that is misplaced confidence. 🎥 TikTok -

This is a long video (15 mns), but is one I would advise every American to make the time to listen to what Bernie Sanders has to say, because the world is sleepwalking into a societal earthquake that will change millions of lives and NOT for the better unless governments regulate the structural damage it could do. This is a vitality important issue to understand and regulate. As someone who works with it and understands its potential, I don’t think people understand just what a societal impact this technology will have. It will be the technology equivalent to shipping manufacturing to China in the 1970s on steroids and that’s just the beginning. The U.S. has bet the house on winning the AI tech stack race and I think that is misplaced confidence. 🎥 TikTok -

𝔗𝔯𝔲𝔱𝔥 𝔐𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔢𝔯𝔰

31,656 views • 7 months ago

This guy is over it with all the unnecessary apps and “smart” everything. He bought a light bulb that wants him to download an app just to turn it on. Then he goes off about appliances that beep like they just landed on the moon, fridges with iPad screens, and how ridiculous passwords have gotten. He’s basically saying we’ve overcomplicated everything for no reason. A lot of people are feeling this way lately. Do you think we’ve gone too far with smart technology and apps, or do you like having everything connected? I think it's gotten out of control as well.

This guy is over it with all the unnecessary apps and “smart” everything. He bought a light bulb that wants him to download an app just to turn it on. Then he goes off about appliances that beep like they just landed on the moon, fridges with iPad screens, and how ridiculous passwords have gotten. He’s basically saying we’ve overcomplicated everything for no reason. A lot of people are feeling this way lately. Do you think we’ve gone too far with smart technology and apps, or do you like having everything connected? I think it's gotten out of control as well.

End3of6Days9 (Helen) 🇺🇸

25,557 views • 24 days ago

Rule of thumb, run everything through at least a lifestraw water bottle. But if you’re going to drink ANY water. This is probably the cleanest water you can possibly find. (Arguably) Also doing your best to get it from where it is coming out of the ground if you wanted to he turbo anal about it. Because some animal “could” be up stream from you (unless you filter it of course) Okay now im just sperging. Water is good, water is life, know how to find it and how to purify it. WAGMI ATS

Rule of thumb, run everything through at least a lifestraw water bottle. But if you’re going to drink ANY water. This is probably the cleanest water you can possibly find. (Arguably) Also doing your best to get it from where it is coming out of the ground if you wanted to he turbo anal about it. Because some animal “could” be up stream from you (unless you filter it of course) Okay now im just sperging. Water is good, water is life, know how to find it and how to purify it. WAGMI ATS

PNWGUERRILLA

40,816 views • 11 months ago

Jensen to AI Leaders: “We have to be far more thoughtful” when communicating to the public Jensen Huang: “(AI) is not a biological being. It is not alien. It is not conscious. It is computer software.” “We say things like, ‘We don't understand it at all.’ It is not true. We understand a lot of things about this technology.” Chamath: “If you were in the seat in the boardroom of Anthropic over that whole scuttlebutt with the Department of War, what do you think you would've told Dario and that team to do, maybe, differently to try to change some of this outcome and some of this perception?” Jensen: “The first thing that I would say about Anthropic is, first of all, the technology is incredible. We are a large consumer of Anthropic technology.” “The desire to warn people about the capability of the technology is also really terrific.” “We just have to make sure that we understand that the world has a spectrum, and that warning is good, scaring is less good because this technology is too important to us.” “I think that it is fine to predict the future, but we need to be a little bit more circumspect. We need to have a little bit more humility, that, in fact, we can't completely predict the future.” “And to say things that are quite extreme, quite catastrophic, that there's no evidence of it happening, could be more damaging than people think.” “And of course we are technology leaders.” “There was a time when nobody listened to us, but now because technology is so important in the social fabric, such an important industry, so important to national security, our words do matter.” “And I think we have to be much more circumspect, we have to be more moderate, we have to be more balanced, we have to be far more thoughtful.”

Jensen to AI Leaders: “We have to be far more thoughtful” when communicating to the public Jensen Huang: “(AI) is not a biological being. It is not alien. It is not conscious. It is computer software.” “We say things like, ‘We don't understand it at all.’ It is not true. We understand a lot of things about this technology.” Chamath: “If you were in the seat in the boardroom of Anthropic over that whole scuttlebutt with the Department of War, what do you think you would've told Dario and that team to do, maybe, differently to try to change some of this outcome and some of this perception?” Jensen: “The first thing that I would say about Anthropic is, first of all, the technology is incredible. We are a large consumer of Anthropic technology.” “The desire to warn people about the capability of the technology is also really terrific.” “We just have to make sure that we understand that the world has a spectrum, and that warning is good, scaring is less good because this technology is too important to us.” “I think that it is fine to predict the future, but we need to be a little bit more circumspect. We need to have a little bit more humility, that, in fact, we can't completely predict the future.” “And to say things that are quite extreme, quite catastrophic, that there's no evidence of it happening, could be more damaging than people think.” “And of course we are technology leaders.” “There was a time when nobody listened to us, but now because technology is so important in the social fabric, such an important industry, so important to national security, our words do matter.” “And I think we have to be much more circumspect, we have to be more moderate, we have to be more balanced, we have to be far more thoughtful.”

The All-In Podcast

56,915 views • 3 months ago

Powell: Like I said, you have inflation's going to be moving up and growth is going to be slowing. But it isn't really -- to me, it's not clear at this time what the appropriate path for monetary policy will be and we're going to need to wait and see how this plays out before we can start to make those adjustment

Powell: Like I said, you have inflation's going to be moving up and growth is going to be slowing. But it isn't really -- to me, it's not clear at this time what the appropriate path for monetary policy will be and we're going to need to wait and see how this plays out before we can start to make those adjustment

Acyn

160,378 views • 1 year ago

.Rob Miles is spitting fire: “People are starting from a prior in which ‘[AIs] are safe until you give me an airtight case for why they're dangerous.’ This framing is exhausting. You explain one of the 10,000 ways that AIs could be dangerous, then they explain why they don't think that specific thing would happen. Then you have to change tack, and then they say, 'your story keeps changing'... "If you're building an AGI, it's like building a Saturn V rocket [but with every human on it]. It's a complex, difficult engineering task, and you're going to try and make it aligned, which means it's going to deliver people to the moon and home again. People ask “why assume they won't just land on the Moon and return home safely?" And I'm like, because you don't know what you're doing! If you try to send people to the moon and you don't know what you're doing, your astronauts will die. [Unlike the telephone, or electricity, where you can assume it’s probably going to work out okay] I contend that ASI is more like the moon rocket. "The moon is small compared with the rest of the sky, so you don't get to the moon by default - you hit some part of the sky that isn't the moon. So, show me the plan by which you predict to specifically hit the moon." And then people say, “how do you predict that [AIs] will want bad things?” There's more bad things than good things! It's not actually a complicated argument... I'm not going to predict specifically where it off into random space your astronauts are going, but you're not going to hit the moon unless you have a really good, technically clear plan for how you do it. And if you ask these people for their plan, they don't have one. What's Yann Lecun’s plan?” "I think that if you're building an enormously powerful technology and you have a lot of uncertainty about what's going to happen, this is bad. Like, this is default unsafe. If you've got something that's going to do enormously influential things in the world, and you don't know what enormously influential things it's going to do, this thing is unsafe until you can convince me that it's safe." HOST: “That’s a good way of thinking about it - with some technologies you can assume that the default will be good or at least neutral, or that the capacity of a person to use this in a very bad way is bounded somehow. There's just only so many people you could electrocute one by one."

.Rob Miles is spitting fire: “People are starting from a prior in which ‘[AIs] are safe until you give me an airtight case for why they're dangerous.’ This framing is exhausting. You explain one of the 10,000 ways that AIs could be dangerous, then they explain why they don't think that specific thing would happen. Then you have to change tack, and then they say, 'your story keeps changing'... "If you're building an AGI, it's like building a Saturn V rocket [but with every human on it]. It's a complex, difficult engineering task, and you're going to try and make it aligned, which means it's going to deliver people to the moon and home again. People ask “why assume they won't just land on the Moon and return home safely?" And I'm like, because you don't know what you're doing! If you try to send people to the moon and you don't know what you're doing, your astronauts will die. [Unlike the telephone, or electricity, where you can assume it’s probably going to work out okay] I contend that ASI is more like the moon rocket. "The moon is small compared with the rest of the sky, so you don't get to the moon by default - you hit some part of the sky that isn't the moon. So, show me the plan by which you predict to specifically hit the moon." And then people say, “how do you predict that [AIs] will want bad things?” There's more bad things than good things! It's not actually a complicated argument... I'm not going to predict specifically where it off into random space your astronauts are going, but you're not going to hit the moon unless you have a really good, technically clear plan for how you do it. And if you ask these people for their plan, they don't have one. What's Yann Lecun’s plan?” "I think that if you're building an enormously powerful technology and you have a lot of uncertainty about what's going to happen, this is bad. Like, this is default unsafe. If you've got something that's going to do enormously influential things in the world, and you don't know what enormously influential things it's going to do, this thing is unsafe until you can convince me that it's safe." HOST: “That’s a good way of thinking about it - with some technologies you can assume that the default will be good or at least neutral, or that the capacity of a person to use this in a very bad way is bounded somehow. There's just only so many people you could electrocute one by one."

AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️

77,350 views • 2 years ago

Amazon is rolling out biometric tech at shopping malls across the US, that allows you to go into a shop and pay with your hand. They are essentially showing us a sneak peak of their new mark of the beast tech 'creatively' called "Amazon One", that most of you connected the dots already that it's a reference to one world order. The fact that you are carrying biometric information at your palm and letting the Amazon handle it should be enough for concern, but many of these microchips will be a target of different hackers trying to steal your private information. Now if a man made this technology, then trust me a man will hack this technology as well. This has one and only purpose to slowly groom you to accept the microchip when it is offered to you. Since the technology advanced sufficiently to allow people to buy things using their bodies, it's a very short step to then putting that technology inside your body. Much love, Maverick.

Amazon is rolling out biometric tech at shopping malls across the US, that allows you to go into a shop and pay with your hand. They are essentially showing us a sneak peak of their new mark of the beast tech 'creatively' called "Amazon One", that most of you connected the dots already that it's a reference to one world order. The fact that you are carrying biometric information at your palm and letting the Amazon handle it should be enough for concern, but many of these microchips will be a target of different hackers trying to steal your private information. Now if a man made this technology, then trust me a man will hack this technology as well. This has one and only purpose to slowly groom you to accept the microchip when it is offered to you. Since the technology advanced sufficiently to allow people to buy things using their bodies, it's a very short step to then putting that technology inside your body. Much love, Maverick.

MAVERICK X

14,200 views • 7 months ago

.Clay Travis just pitched a “crazy” idea to make Jimmy Kimmel’s show more politically balanced. This might actually make it worth watching. “I would say he [Jimmy] should say every week from now on, we’re going to have a Donald Trump voter on as a guest, and we’re going to make it a part, since this is a talk show that’s supposed to speak to all of America. “Doesn’t mean that strident politically or anything like that. But I would say you could start with Adam Carolla, his old friend on The Man Show.” Talking to the other side—what a crazy idea. If Jimmy really wants ratings for his show, this is how you get it done.

.Clay Travis just pitched a “crazy” idea to make Jimmy Kimmel’s show more politically balanced. This might actually make it worth watching. “I would say he [Jimmy] should say every week from now on, we’re going to have a Donald Trump voter on as a guest, and we’re going to make it a part, since this is a talk show that’s supposed to speak to all of America. “Doesn’t mean that strident politically or anything like that. But I would say you could start with Adam Carolla, his old friend on The Man Show.” Talking to the other side—what a crazy idea. If Jimmy really wants ratings for his show, this is how you get it done.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

746,446 views • 9 months ago

This man says that his grandma taught him this- how to dispose of cooking grease. He takes a cup and wraps tinfoil around it to make a mold. Takes the cup out and pours the grease in the tinfoil mold and then puts paper towels inside the tinfoil to suck up the grease and then throws it away. A few people said they run scalding hot water and then pour it down the garbage disposal. 🤯 Some say they wait for it to harden and then just scoop it up and put it in a ziploc and throw it away because it is not healthy and bad for you. I remember growing up and my mom having all kinds of reused spaghetti jars, pickle jars and coffee cans full of grease that she saved for making bacon and gravy. Is this what you learned growing up? Did you throw it out? Or do you save it in jars?

This man says that his grandma taught him this- how to dispose of cooking grease. He takes a cup and wraps tinfoil around it to make a mold. Takes the cup out and pours the grease in the tinfoil mold and then puts paper towels inside the tinfoil to suck up the grease and then throws it away. A few people said they run scalding hot water and then pour it down the garbage disposal. 🤯 Some say they wait for it to harden and then just scoop it up and put it in a ziploc and throw it away because it is not healthy and bad for you. I remember growing up and my mom having all kinds of reused spaghetti jars, pickle jars and coffee cans full of grease that she saved for making bacon and gravy. Is this what you learned growing up? Did you throw it out? Or do you save it in jars?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

273,890 views • 1 month ago

Elon Musk: Irrational regulations are an invisible tax on humanity. “You really can think of the United States and many countries – it's arguably worse in the EU – as being like Gulliver, tied down by a million little strings. Any one given regulation is not that bad, but you've got millions of them. Eventually, you just can't get anything done. This is a massive tax on the consumer, on the people. It's just that they don't realize that there's this massive tax in the form of irrational regulations. I'll give you a recent example that is just insane. SpaceX was fined by the EPA [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency] $140,000 for, they claimed, dumping potable water on the ground, drinking water. This is at Starbase, and we're like, we're in a tropical thunderstorm region. That stuff comes from the sky all the time. You know, it was just water to cool the launch pad during liftoff. And there's zero harm done. And they agree: Yes, there's zero harm done. We're like, okay, so there's no harm done, and you want us to pay a $140,000 fine? Yes, because you didn't have a permit. We didn't know there was a permit needed for zero-harm, fresh water being on the ground in a place where fresh water falls from the sky all the time. I mean, sometimes it rains so much the roads are flooded. So we're like, how does this make any sense? And they were like, we're not going to process any more of your applications for Starship launch unless you pay this $140,000. They just ransomed us. And we're like, okay, so we paid $140,000. But this is no good. I mean, at this rate, we're never going to get to Mars.” Source: The All-In Podcast, September 9, 2024

Elon Musk: Irrational regulations are an invisible tax on humanity. “You really can think of the United States and many countries – it's arguably worse in the EU – as being like Gulliver, tied down by a million little strings. Any one given regulation is not that bad, but you've got millions of them. Eventually, you just can't get anything done. This is a massive tax on the consumer, on the people. It's just that they don't realize that there's this massive tax in the form of irrational regulations. I'll give you a recent example that is just insane. SpaceX was fined by the EPA [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency] $140,000 for, they claimed, dumping potable water on the ground, drinking water. This is at Starbase, and we're like, we're in a tropical thunderstorm region. That stuff comes from the sky all the time. You know, it was just water to cool the launch pad during liftoff. And there's zero harm done. And they agree: Yes, there's zero harm done. We're like, okay, so there's no harm done, and you want us to pay a $140,000 fine? Yes, because you didn't have a permit. We didn't know there was a permit needed for zero-harm, fresh water being on the ground in a place where fresh water falls from the sky all the time. I mean, sometimes it rains so much the roads are flooded. So we're like, how does this make any sense? And they were like, we're not going to process any more of your applications for Starship launch unless you pay this $140,000. They just ransomed us. And we're like, okay, so we paid $140,000. But this is no good. I mean, at this rate, we're never going to get to Mars.” Source: The All-In Podcast, September 9, 2024

ELON CLIPS

13,970,339 views • 1 year ago

🚨JUST NOW: Presdient Trump on the FIFA World Cup Q: "First time for the U.S. to host since the 90s. You ready for it?" TRUMP: "I'm ready for it. Johnny has done a fantastic job with FIFA, and looking -- we have already set records with ticket sales. Never anything like it in any sport. And so I want to congratulate you, and I don't have to wait, but major records have been set. Nice to see you." "It is just a big day, it's a great sport, and it is coming to America and never." "Nobody ever thought a thing like this could happen, and I'm very happy to say we've already set the all-time record on ticket sales long before the first ball is kicked, right?"

🚨JUST NOW: Presdient Trump on the FIFA World Cup Q: "First time for the U.S. to host since the 90s. You ready for it?" TRUMP: "I'm ready for it. Johnny has done a fantastic job with FIFA, and looking -- we have already set records with ticket sales. Never anything like it in any sport. And so I want to congratulate you, and I don't have to wait, but major records have been set. Nice to see you." "It is just a big day, it's a great sport, and it is coming to America and never." "Nobody ever thought a thing like this could happen, and I'm very happy to say we've already set the all-time record on ticket sales long before the first ball is kicked, right?"

The Patriot Oasis™

224,561 views • 7 months ago

ELON: YOUR TESLA WILL ACTUALLY BE MAKING MONEY FOR YOU “Sometimes people wonder how do you go from this big fleet to actually monetizing the fleet in an autonomous situation? And it's actually a combination. It's like Airbnb and Uber, to some degree. So, there'll be some cars that Tesla owns itself. It's kind of like an Uber fashion. But then, for the fleet, that is owned by our customers, it will be like an Airbnb thing. You can add or subtract your car to the fleet whenever you want. So you can say, I'm going away for a week. Just one tap on your Tesla app, your car gets added to the fleet, and it just makes money for you while you're gone. So you can add it to the fleet for a few hours, for a few days, for a few weeks. Whenever you want it back, you can say, come back. And the car will come right back. And I'm highly confident that the revenue made by the owner of the car will far exceed the actual monthly payment. And then, Tesla will obviously take a revenue share on that, but most of the money will go to the owner of the car. And this is actually going to work. This is what will happen. I mean, mark my words. This is simply a matter of time.” Source: Tesla Shareholder Meeting, June 2024

ELON: YOUR TESLA WILL ACTUALLY BE MAKING MONEY FOR YOU “Sometimes people wonder how do you go from this big fleet to actually monetizing the fleet in an autonomous situation? And it's actually a combination. It's like Airbnb and Uber, to some degree. So, there'll be some cars that Tesla owns itself. It's kind of like an Uber fashion. But then, for the fleet, that is owned by our customers, it will be like an Airbnb thing. You can add or subtract your car to the fleet whenever you want. So you can say, I'm going away for a week. Just one tap on your Tesla app, your car gets added to the fleet, and it just makes money for you while you're gone. So you can add it to the fleet for a few hours, for a few days, for a few weeks. Whenever you want it back, you can say, come back. And the car will come right back. And I'm highly confident that the revenue made by the owner of the car will far exceed the actual monthly payment. And then, Tesla will obviously take a revenue share on that, but most of the money will go to the owner of the car. And this is actually going to work. This is what will happen. I mean, mark my words. This is simply a matter of time.” Source: Tesla Shareholder Meeting, June 2024

Mario Nawfal

2,083,131 views • 1 year ago