Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

Technology is going too far. This is a Amazon connected Smart Sink Faucet You can say things like “Alexa, will 1 cup of water” But the time it takes to say this, wait for Alexa to respond, and then perform the confirmation task to start filling you could have...

91,757 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

34 Kommentare

Profilbild von Sean Nienow
Sean Nienowvor 3 Monaten

Alexa: "The Department of Natural Resources indicates your potable water usage currently exceeds recommendations. Requests must currently be rationed. Here is your one-half cup of water."

Profilbild von Heartland Grump - The Rightest Voice on the Right
Heartland Grump - The Rightest Voice on the Rightvor 3 Monaten

It makes perfect sense. If you want to give a corporation and, eventually, the government control over how much water you are allowed to have at any given time.

Profilbild von Edward
Edwardvor 3 Monaten

Me: Alexa please I just want a cup of water! Alexa: I'm sorry Dave. I can't do that.

Profilbild von Al Ruddy 🇺🇲 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧
Al Ruddy 🇺🇲 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧vor 3 Monaten

If you're talking to technology, somebody somewhere is listening.

Profilbild von Pakmann2k
Pakmann2kvor 3 Monaten

I started using touchless over a decade ago and will never look back. Smart is overkill, touchless is all you need. I cook a lot so working with raw meats, this makes it so I don't get germs on my faucet and rarely need to clean it.

Profilbild von Tube of 𝕋𝕣𝕦𝕥𝕙𝕡𝕒𝕤𝕥𝕖 ✞
Tube of 𝕋𝕣𝕦𝕥𝕙𝕡𝕒𝕤𝕥𝕖 ✞vor 3 Monaten

I'm throwing my entire house away if I ever end up researching firmware updates for a kitchen faucet.

Profilbild von Missy in So Cal 𝄞𝄢 🇺🇸
Missy in So Cal 𝄞𝄢 🇺🇸vor 3 Monaten

This is all I know.

Profilbild von David Castro
David Castrovor 3 Monaten

Say you're making soup and need a gallon of water. You could place the pot under the faucet, turn around and keep chopping veggies while saying the prompt, and get an exact gallon. I think it's cool. Is it worth a grand? No. But kinda cool

Profilbild von GodlikeGamer
GodlikeGamervor 3 Monaten

Lazy idiots. THAT is what things like this are for.

Profilbild von Cory M Clark
Cory M Clarkvor 3 Monaten

That’s because you’re too primitive to understand the value of a faucet that can monitor your language and limited your usage if you say to many mean words. You obviously don’t deserve access to water if you say the N word, I mean if you’re white that is.

Profilbild von Rosco King
Rosco Kingvor 3 Monaten

Also, that water is usually not filtered and tends to harbor more bacteria due to being mixed with hot water. Not to mention heavy metals from sitting in your line.

Profilbild von MacroDog
MacroDogvor 3 Monaten

“Alexa, how bout a quick wank?” that will be the top.

Profilbild von Scott Jordan
Scott Jordanvor 3 Monaten

"Alexa, call a repairman for my 13-month old faucet, it won't boot up"

Profilbild von James St. James
James St. Jamesvor 3 Monaten

How long until we get the Amazon Asswiper?

Profilbild von belladio
belladiovor 3 Monaten

That's one of the most useless things I've ever seen, hugely expensive too. It's probably helpful for those with vision issues but that's about it.

Profilbild von chachi arcola🇺🇸
chachi arcola🇺🇸vor 3 Monaten

Yea get that so when the power goes out you wont be able to turn on the water

Profilbild von Sal Minella
Sal Minellavor 3 Monaten

If you cook enough you should be able to fill 8 ounces by the feel of it (even if you haven’t realized it yet). Same as when you get some water from the fridge spigot in the dark in a glass you commonly use. You don’t need to see it.

Profilbild von Booter | Dividend Investor | Options Trader
Booter | Dividend Investor | Options Tradervor 3 Monaten

Another absolutely useless thing AI is being used for.

Profilbild von (Unbannable) Dr. Noodle Prophet
(Unbannable) Dr. Noodle Prophetvor 3 Monaten

The only benefit to this is the motion sensor to turn water on/off which is good if you're cooking or have your hands dirty and don't wanna wash to touch the handle. Otherwise stupid and even requires firmware updates

Profilbild von Johnny Coxville
Johnny Coxvillevor 3 Monaten

Is this AI slop?

Profilbild von Deb Lee 🌟
Deb Lee 🌟vor 3 Monaten

Ultimate laziness. I’m truly shocked at the number of people who have a healthy fear of the surveillance state but let this shit into their homes.

Profilbild von Mark Scott Erickson
Mark Scott Ericksonvor 3 Monaten

I wish I could remove Alexa from the appscreen of my Amazon fire tablet, and I would never use Alexa. I heard too much about how it can destroy your privacy.

Profilbild von Mountain Mama
Mountain Mamavor 3 Monaten

This is just the beginning. It’ll get faster.

Profilbild von luder888
luder888vor 3 Monaten

What kind of psychopath doesn't flush the first few seconds of water before using it?

Profilbild von Max Payne
Max Paynevor 3 Monaten

I guess if you want an exact amount it makes sense, but like, do it yourself retard.

Profilbild von NapalmZ
NapalmZvor 3 Monaten

It makes perfect sense. You can just pour a cup of water into a bowl of flour in 3 seconds and you know it is exact.

Profilbild von DragonSoul.eth 🐲
DragonSoul.eth 🐲vor 3 Monaten

For the truly lazy people or the ones that want to show off stupidity

Profilbild von Bob
Bobvor 3 Monaten

Echo sucks, and it’s gotten worse. It’s one constant sales pitch now. The “by the way” deal that couldn’t be turned off was obnoxious.

Profilbild von JustAvoice
JustAvoicevor 3 Monaten

lol. my google home still cant do basic shit it should be able.. "google how much time left on the kitchen timer" "I'm sorry I cant do that" Wow real smart google.

Profilbild von HowYouRadicalizedMe
HowYouRadicalizedMevor 3 Monaten

No no no The main use is to have your friends over when you just so happen to be making oatmeal, and then you say the thing and watch their faces and--- ---and yes. Everything about this is stupid.

Profilbild von TK
TKvor 3 Monaten

It’s does if you have a disability

Profilbild von 🫧🛸Piper🏝️Paprika🛸🫧
🫧🛸Piper🏝️Paprika🛸🫧vor 3 Monaten

These ppl that entertain all this smart shit— gonna regret it in the end. Retards

Profilbild von Infoseeker
Infoseekervor 3 Monaten

Open the pod bay doors HAL

Profilbild von Scrambler808
Scrambler808vor 3 Monaten

And it probably used 4 cups of water at the data center to process the request.

Ähnliche Videos

I asked Garry Tan how to use meta prompting to get better at AI: "My partners at YC Jared Friedman and Pete Koomen showed me how to do this. You can take almost anything that you do all the time and just drop it into a context window. And then say, “Here’s a bunch of inputs and outputs." And maybe you also add a bunch of notes. And then you tell it, “Write me a prompt that can act as an agent that takes this input and makes this output over here.” You can do this for almost any type of knowledge work. And you can even introspect. "What are things you notice that I did to convert this from the input to the output?”. And then you can just start using the prompt. Initially, it’s going to suck. Because it’s just not that smart yet. But what’s funny is now, I also use it to Iterate my writing. You can be very direct, "I would never say that", "Don’t say it like this", or "Oh, you used the long word there, use the short word". Just speak to it conversationally. And then when you're happy with the output, you can use that new output to make a new prompt. "Based on this conversation, give me a better initial prompt that incorporates all the things we talked about." And you can do this with literally everything. And in theory, there’s so much it applies to that people do day-to-day. You could use it for tweets. You could use it for editing podcasts. You can use it for pretty much everything. I have a folder of prompts that I use all the time. My YouTube prompt is on v27 or something. I'll go through this process with all the different max models. I'll use GPT 5.2 Pro. I’ll use Grok. I'll use Claude. Then, I’ll take all the outputs from all the models and put them into Claude and say "Here’s my prompt, here’s the output from four LLMs, including yourself. Rate each response and tell me what the pros and cons of each approach are." And I usually say "give it to me in numbered form". And then you can agree with one, disagree with two, tell it three is this or that. And then after that, you say given all of this, synthesize it."

The Peel

51,632 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

How will we know if an AI take over is imminent? What are the warning signs? Connor Leahy: “Things will seem mostly normal, just… weird. Things will get weirder…and weirder… and then one day, we will just not be in control anymore. “There won't be a fight. There won't be a war. It won't be dramatic. It will just be that one day the machines are in control, and not us.” “The way I expect [AI take over] to feel is like, if you play chess against a grandmaster, it doesn’t feel like you're having a heroic battle against the Terminator…. it doesn’t feel like you're having this incredible back and forth, and then you lose... No, it feels more like you THINK you're playing well, you think everything is okay, and then suddenly… you lose… in one move, and you don't know why. This is what it feels like to play chess against a grandmaster, and this is what it's going to feel like for humanity to play against AGI. It won’t be some dramatic battle where the Terminators rise up and try to destroy humanity. No, it will be… things get more and more confusing. [Editor's note: Like Sam Altman, out of nowhere, raising up to 10% of world GDP?] More and more jobs get automated faster and faster... More and more technology gets built, which no one even quite knows how the technology works... There will be mass media movements that don't really make any sense... Like, do we really know the truth of what's going on in the world right now, even now with social media? Do you or I really know what's going on? How much of this is fake? How much of it is generated with AI or other methods? We don't know. And this will get much worse.” Imagine if you have extremely intelligent systems, much smarter than humans, that can generate any image, any video, anything, trying to manipulate you well...and being able to develop new technologies to interfere with politics.”

AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️

189,044 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Jensen to AI Leaders: “We have to be far more thoughtful” when communicating to the public Jensen Huang: “(AI) is not a biological being. It is not alien. It is not conscious. It is computer software.” “We say things like, ‘We don't understand it at all.’ It is not true. We understand a lot of things about this technology.” Chamath: “If you were in the seat in the boardroom of Anthropic over that whole scuttlebutt with the Department of War, what do you think you would've told Dario and that team to do, maybe, differently to try to change some of this outcome and some of this perception?” Jensen: “The first thing that I would say about Anthropic is, first of all, the technology is incredible. We are a large consumer of Anthropic technology.” “The desire to warn people about the capability of the technology is also really terrific.” “We just have to make sure that we understand that the world has a spectrum, and that warning is good, scaring is less good because this technology is too important to us.” “I think that it is fine to predict the future, but we need to be a little bit more circumspect. We need to have a little bit more humility, that, in fact, we can't completely predict the future.” “And to say things that are quite extreme, quite catastrophic, that there's no evidence of it happening, could be more damaging than people think.” “And of course we are technology leaders.” “There was a time when nobody listened to us, but now because technology is so important in the social fabric, such an important industry, so important to national security, our words do matter.” “And I think we have to be much more circumspect, we have to be more moderate, we have to be more balanced, we have to be far more thoughtful.”

The All-In Podcast

57,581 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

.Rob Miles is spitting fire: “People are starting from a prior in which ‘[AIs] are safe until you give me an airtight case for why they're dangerous.’ This framing is exhausting. You explain one of the 10,000 ways that AIs could be dangerous, then they explain why they don't think that specific thing would happen. Then you have to change tack, and then they say, 'your story keeps changing'... "If you're building an AGI, it's like building a Saturn V rocket [but with every human on it]. It's a complex, difficult engineering task, and you're going to try and make it aligned, which means it's going to deliver people to the moon and home again. People ask “why assume they won't just land on the Moon and return home safely?" And I'm like, because you don't know what you're doing! If you try to send people to the moon and you don't know what you're doing, your astronauts will die. [Unlike the telephone, or electricity, where you can assume it’s probably going to work out okay] I contend that ASI is more like the moon rocket. "The moon is small compared with the rest of the sky, so you don't get to the moon by default - you hit some part of the sky that isn't the moon. So, show me the plan by which you predict to specifically hit the moon." And then people say, “how do you predict that [AIs] will want bad things?” There's more bad things than good things! It's not actually a complicated argument... I'm not going to predict specifically where it off into random space your astronauts are going, but you're not going to hit the moon unless you have a really good, technically clear plan for how you do it. And if you ask these people for their plan, they don't have one. What's Yann Lecun’s plan?” "I think that if you're building an enormously powerful technology and you have a lot of uncertainty about what's going to happen, this is bad. Like, this is default unsafe. If you've got something that's going to do enormously influential things in the world, and you don't know what enormously influential things it's going to do, this thing is unsafe until you can convince me that it's safe." HOST: “That’s a good way of thinking about it - with some technologies you can assume that the default will be good or at least neutral, or that the capacity of a person to use this in a very bad way is bounded somehow. There's just only so many people you could electrocute one by one."

AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️

77,397 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren