正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

Technology is going too far. This is a Amazon connected Smart Sink Faucet You can say things like “Alexa, will 1 cup of water” But the time it takes to say this, wait for Alexa to respond, and then perform the confirmation task to start filling you could have... show more

Wall Street Apes

1,392,879 subscribers

91,706 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治科学技术

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

“A ship doesn’t sink because of the water around. A ship will sink because of the water that get in. I’m not going to allow the water that is outside to get into my ship and sink it.” — Burna Boy says.

“A ship doesn’t sink because of the water around. A ship will sink because of the water that get in. I’m not going to allow the water that is outside to get into my ship and sink it.” — Burna Boy says.

𝐀𝐬𝐚𝐤𝐲𝐆𝐑𝐍

79,522 次观看 • 7 个月前

SITUATION EXPLAINED: Why is Anthropic structurally a religion of Claude? We asked Duncan, writer and philosopher at PALLADIUM Magazine "When I think of religion, it's not just you believe in something supernatural. You think of worship and ritual and this kind of orientation. And you don't even have to have any kind of woo addition, you can just look at Anthropic as it is and say, 'This is a religion of Claude, just structurally. That's what it is.'" "We're gonna get so much more of that. And at the same time, you're also going to get all of these different religions sweeping in to fill the void as there's this kind of psychological disturbance." "Everyone's gonna be just losing their mind as the world is transformed. They're gonna reach out for Christian eschatology like Thiel." "I did a Jhana retreat a year ago, and it was full of Anthropic employees, because everyone, they sense this crazy spiritual whirlwind that's going on as the world is just snowballing with this technology, and they're reaching out just to try and make sense of it."

SITUATION EXPLAINED: Why is Anthropic structurally a religion of Claude? We asked Duncan, writer and philosopher at PALLADIUM Magazine "When I think of religion, it's not just you believe in something supernatural. You think of worship and ritual and this kind of orientation. And you don't even have to have any kind of woo addition, you can just look at Anthropic as it is and say, 'This is a religion of Claude, just structurally. That's what it is.'" "We're gonna get so much more of that. And at the same time, you're also going to get all of these different religions sweeping in to fill the void as there's this kind of psychological disturbance." "Everyone's gonna be just losing their mind as the world is transformed. They're gonna reach out for Christian eschatology like Thiel." "I did a Jhana retreat a year ago, and it was full of Anthropic employees, because everyone, they sense this crazy spiritual whirlwind that's going on as the world is just snowballing with this technology, and they're reaching out just to try and make sense of it."

MTS

15,488 次观看 • 2 个月前

Took Mom to an Airbnb, and she spent 10 minutes marveling at the vessel sink like it was an alien piece of technology. 😭 She turned the faucet on like she was unveiling a artifact, kept repeating "Trina, look... a whole bowl!", and was genuinely concerned the water was going to fill up like cereal. The pure joy and absolute confusion over modern interior design is unmatched. Honestly, vessel sinks are either peak luxury or an accident waiting to happen—there is no in-between. Do you love modern interior design quirks, or are you on Mom’s side on this one? 👇

Took Mom to an Airbnb, and she spent 10 minutes marveling at the vessel sink like it was an alien piece of technology. 😭 She turned the faucet on like she was unveiling a artifact, kept repeating "Trina, look... a whole bowl!", and was genuinely concerned the water was going to fill up like cereal. The pure joy and absolute confusion over modern interior design is unmatched. Honestly, vessel sinks are either peak luxury or an accident waiting to happen—there is no in-between. Do you love modern interior design quirks, or are you on Mom’s side on this one? 👇

🔥⭐️Edwin⭐️🔥

17,250 次观看 • 22 天前

I asked Garry Tan how to use meta prompting to get better at AI: "My partners at YC Jared Friedman and Pete Koomen showed me how to do this. You can take almost anything that you do all the time and just drop it into a context window. And then say, “Here’s a bunch of inputs and outputs." And maybe you also add a bunch of notes. And then you tell it, “Write me a prompt that can act as an agent that takes this input and makes this output over here.” You can do this for almost any type of knowledge work. And you can even introspect. "What are things you notice that I did to convert this from the input to the output?”. And then you can just start using the prompt. Initially, it’s going to suck. Because it’s just not that smart yet. But what’s funny is now, I also use it to Iterate my writing. You can be very direct, "I would never say that", "Don’t say it like this", or "Oh, you used the long word there, use the short word". Just speak to it conversationally. And then when you're happy with the output, you can use that new output to make a new prompt. "Based on this conversation, give me a better initial prompt that incorporates all the things we talked about." And you can do this with literally everything. And in theory, there’s so much it applies to that people do day-to-day. You could use it for tweets. You could use it for editing podcasts. You can use it for pretty much everything. I have a folder of prompts that I use all the time. My YouTube prompt is on v27 or something. I'll go through this process with all the different max models. I'll use GPT 5.2 Pro. I’ll use Grok. I'll use Claude. Then, I’ll take all the outputs from all the models and put them into Claude and say "Here’s my prompt, here’s the output from four LLMs, including yourself. Rate each response and tell me what the pros and cons of each approach are." And I usually say "give it to me in numbered form". And then you can agree with one, disagree with two, tell it three is this or that. And then after that, you say given all of this, synthesize it."

I asked Garry Tan how to use meta prompting to get better at AI: "My partners at YC Jared Friedman and Pete Koomen showed me how to do this. You can take almost anything that you do all the time and just drop it into a context window. And then say, “Here’s a bunch of inputs and outputs." And maybe you also add a bunch of notes. And then you tell it, “Write me a prompt that can act as an agent that takes this input and makes this output over here.” You can do this for almost any type of knowledge work. And you can even introspect. "What are things you notice that I did to convert this from the input to the output?”. And then you can just start using the prompt. Initially, it’s going to suck. Because it’s just not that smart yet. But what’s funny is now, I also use it to Iterate my writing. You can be very direct, "I would never say that", "Don’t say it like this", or "Oh, you used the long word there, use the short word". Just speak to it conversationally. And then when you're happy with the output, you can use that new output to make a new prompt. "Based on this conversation, give me a better initial prompt that incorporates all the things we talked about." And you can do this with literally everything. And in theory, there’s so much it applies to that people do day-to-day. You could use it for tweets. You could use it for editing podcasts. You can use it for pretty much everything. I have a folder of prompts that I use all the time. My YouTube prompt is on v27 or something. I'll go through this process with all the different max models. I'll use GPT 5.2 Pro. I’ll use Grok. I'll use Claude. Then, I’ll take all the outputs from all the models and put them into Claude and say "Here’s my prompt, here’s the output from four LLMs, including yourself. Rate each response and tell me what the pros and cons of each approach are." And I usually say "give it to me in numbered form". And then you can agree with one, disagree with two, tell it three is this or that. And then after that, you say given all of this, synthesize it."

The Peel

51,632 次观看 • 6 个月前

How will we know if an AI take over is imminent? What are the warning signs? Connor Leahy: “Things will seem mostly normal, just… weird. Things will get weirder…and weirder… and then one day, we will just not be in control anymore. “There won't be a fight. There won't be a war. It won't be dramatic. It will just be that one day the machines are in control, and not us.” “The way I expect [AI take over] to feel is like, if you play chess against a grandmaster, it doesn’t feel like you're having a heroic battle against the Terminator…. it doesn’t feel like you're having this incredible back and forth, and then you lose... No, it feels more like you THINK you're playing well, you think everything is okay, and then suddenly… you lose… in one move, and you don't know why. This is what it feels like to play chess against a grandmaster, and this is what it's going to feel like for humanity to play against AGI. It won’t be some dramatic battle where the Terminators rise up and try to destroy humanity. No, it will be… things get more and more confusing. [Editor's note: Like Sam Altman, out of nowhere, raising up to 10% of world GDP?] More and more jobs get automated faster and faster... More and more technology gets built, which no one even quite knows how the technology works... There will be mass media movements that don't really make any sense... Like, do we really know the truth of what's going on in the world right now, even now with social media? Do you or I really know what's going on? How much of this is fake? How much of it is generated with AI or other methods? We don't know. And this will get much worse.” Imagine if you have extremely intelligent systems, much smarter than humans, that can generate any image, any video, anything, trying to manipulate you well...and being able to develop new technologies to interfere with politics.”

How will we know if an AI take over is imminent? What are the warning signs? Connor Leahy: “Things will seem mostly normal, just… weird. Things will get weirder…and weirder… and then one day, we will just not be in control anymore. “There won't be a fight. There won't be a war. It won't be dramatic. It will just be that one day the machines are in control, and not us.” “The way I expect [AI take over] to feel is like, if you play chess against a grandmaster, it doesn’t feel like you're having a heroic battle against the Terminator…. it doesn’t feel like you're having this incredible back and forth, and then you lose... No, it feels more like you THINK you're playing well, you think everything is okay, and then suddenly… you lose… in one move, and you don't know why. This is what it feels like to play chess against a grandmaster, and this is what it's going to feel like for humanity to play against AGI. It won’t be some dramatic battle where the Terminators rise up and try to destroy humanity. No, it will be… things get more and more confusing. [Editor's note: Like Sam Altman, out of nowhere, raising up to 10% of world GDP?] More and more jobs get automated faster and faster... More and more technology gets built, which no one even quite knows how the technology works... There will be mass media movements that don't really make any sense... Like, do we really know the truth of what's going on in the world right now, even now with social media? Do you or I really know what's going on? How much of this is fake? How much of it is generated with AI or other methods? We don't know. And this will get much worse.” Imagine if you have extremely intelligent systems, much smarter than humans, that can generate any image, any video, anything, trying to manipulate you well...and being able to develop new technologies to interfere with politics.”

AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️

183,443 次观看 • 2 年前

So you just got arrested for alleged shoplifting and you think it is a smart idea to have a chat about what you are going to say in the police van in the US? 😂 Peet Viljoen, telling his wife, Mel Viljoen, that she makes friends easily, she’s beautiful, and people will be obsessed with her … ALSO that she mustn’t make any admissions and that she should say it was a misunderstanding around one trolley of water. 🤦🏻‍♀️

So you just got arrested for alleged shoplifting and you think it is a smart idea to have a chat about what you are going to say in the police van in the US? 😂 Peet Viljoen, telling his wife, Mel Viljoen, that she makes friends easily, she’s beautiful, and people will be obsessed with her … ALSO that she mustn’t make any admissions and that she should say it was a misunderstanding around one trolley of water. 🤦🏻‍♀️

Bianca van Wyk

250,814 次观看 • 1 个月前

I have seen this video in many WhatsApp groups, and many of you sent it to me too. The solution to this problem is for Mnangagwa’s Government to license Starlink and open up the market. But will that happen? Old technology is expensive to run, new technology makes things cheaper. Without Starlink the price of data will remain ridiculously high because of less competition and of course the economy is in a free fall too.

I have seen this video in many WhatsApp groups, and many of you sent it to me too. The solution to this problem is for Mnangagwa’s Government to license Starlink and open up the market. But will that happen? Old technology is expensive to run, new technology makes things cheaper. Without Starlink the price of data will remain ridiculously high because of less competition and of course the economy is in a free fall too.

Hopewell Chin’ono

121,121 次观看 • 2 年前

No pain like it, it's one thing to have your own heartbreak, but to see your son next to you, inconsolable, knowing there is nothing you can say or do to make things better, is the worst Will take a lot to get over this one, eventually, we all will, and then go again next season

No pain like it, it's one thing to have your own heartbreak, but to see your son next to you, inconsolable, knowing there is nothing you can say or do to make things better, is the worst Will take a lot to get over this one, eventually, we all will, and then go again next season

Lewis Thompson

15,850 次观看 • 3 个月前

Just say the thing. "When I got to Opendoor, I would sit in meetings where everyone would act like everything was going well, but things were not going well. You could tell things were not going well by the shape of the chart." How do you change this? You have to say the thing and say it now. "Say it about the thing, not the person. Always say, 'This sucks,' not, 'You suck.'" It's ok to call out stupidity.

Just say the thing. "When I got to Opendoor, I would sit in meetings where everyone would act like everything was going well, but things were not going well. You could tell things were not going well by the shape of the chart." How do you change this? You have to say the thing and say it now. "Say it about the thing, not the person. Always say, 'This sucks,' not, 'You suck.'" It's ok to call out stupidity.

Shane Parrish

88,168 次观看 • 1 个月前

BREAKING: President Trump just announced that he will force Gavin Newsom to redirect water from the Klamath River into California cities instead of dumping it into the Pacific, which would stop all the fires. "This is a true tragedy, and it's a mistake of the governor, and you could say the [Biden] administration." It's just common sense. The water is there. USE IT instead of trying to save a bunch of floppy fish.

BREAKING: President Trump just announced that he will force Gavin Newsom to redirect water from the Klamath River into California cities instead of dumping it into the Pacific, which would stop all the fires. "This is a true tragedy, and it's a mistake of the governor, and you could say the [Biden] administration." It's just common sense. The water is there. USE IT instead of trying to save a bunch of floppy fish.

George

3,336,115 次观看 • 1 年前

This is a long video (15 mns), but is one I would advise every American to make the time to listen to what Bernie Sanders has to say, because the world is sleepwalking into a societal earthquake that will change millions of lives and NOT for the better unless governments regulate the structural damage it could do. This is a vitality important issue to understand and regulate. As someone who works with it and understands its potential, I don’t think people understand just what a societal impact this technology will have. It will be the technology equivalent to shipping manufacturing to China in the 1970s on steroids and that’s just the beginning. The U.S. has bet the house on winning the AI tech stack race and I think that is misplaced confidence. 🎥 TikTok -

This is a long video (15 mns), but is one I would advise every American to make the time to listen to what Bernie Sanders has to say, because the world is sleepwalking into a societal earthquake that will change millions of lives and NOT for the better unless governments regulate the structural damage it could do. This is a vitality important issue to understand and regulate. As someone who works with it and understands its potential, I don’t think people understand just what a societal impact this technology will have. It will be the technology equivalent to shipping manufacturing to China in the 1970s on steroids and that’s just the beginning. The U.S. has bet the house on winning the AI tech stack race and I think that is misplaced confidence. 🎥 TikTok -

𝔗𝔯𝔲𝔱𝔥 𝔐𝔞𝔱𝔱𝔢𝔯𝔰

31,670 次观看 • 9 个月前

Jensen to AI Leaders: “We have to be far more thoughtful” when communicating to the public Jensen Huang: “(AI) is not a biological being. It is not alien. It is not conscious. It is computer software.” “We say things like, ‘We don't understand it at all.’ It is not true. We understand a lot of things about this technology.” Chamath: “If you were in the seat in the boardroom of Anthropic over that whole scuttlebutt with the Department of War, what do you think you would've told Dario and that team to do, maybe, differently to try to change some of this outcome and some of this perception?” Jensen: “The first thing that I would say about Anthropic is, first of all, the technology is incredible. We are a large consumer of Anthropic technology.” “The desire to warn people about the capability of the technology is also really terrific.” “We just have to make sure that we understand that the world has a spectrum, and that warning is good, scaring is less good because this technology is too important to us.” “I think that it is fine to predict the future, but we need to be a little bit more circumspect. We need to have a little bit more humility, that, in fact, we can't completely predict the future.” “And to say things that are quite extreme, quite catastrophic, that there's no evidence of it happening, could be more damaging than people think.” “And of course we are technology leaders.” “There was a time when nobody listened to us, but now because technology is so important in the social fabric, such an important industry, so important to national security, our words do matter.” “And I think we have to be much more circumspect, we have to be more moderate, we have to be more balanced, we have to be far more thoughtful.”

Jensen to AI Leaders: “We have to be far more thoughtful” when communicating to the public Jensen Huang: “(AI) is not a biological being. It is not alien. It is not conscious. It is computer software.” “We say things like, ‘We don't understand it at all.’ It is not true. We understand a lot of things about this technology.” Chamath: “If you were in the seat in the boardroom of Anthropic over that whole scuttlebutt with the Department of War, what do you think you would've told Dario and that team to do, maybe, differently to try to change some of this outcome and some of this perception?” Jensen: “The first thing that I would say about Anthropic is, first of all, the technology is incredible. We are a large consumer of Anthropic technology.” “The desire to warn people about the capability of the technology is also really terrific.” “We just have to make sure that we understand that the world has a spectrum, and that warning is good, scaring is less good because this technology is too important to us.” “I think that it is fine to predict the future, but we need to be a little bit more circumspect. We need to have a little bit more humility, that, in fact, we can't completely predict the future.” “And to say things that are quite extreme, quite catastrophic, that there's no evidence of it happening, could be more damaging than people think.” “And of course we are technology leaders.” “There was a time when nobody listened to us, but now because technology is so important in the social fabric, such an important industry, so important to national security, our words do matter.” “And I think we have to be much more circumspect, we have to be more moderate, we have to be more balanced, we have to be far more thoughtful.”

The All-In Podcast

57,581 次观看 • 5 个月前

This guy is over it with all the unnecessary apps and “smart” everything. He bought a light bulb that wants him to download an app just to turn it on. Then he goes off about appliances that beep like they just landed on the moon, fridges with iPad screens, and how ridiculous passwords have gotten. He’s basically saying we’ve overcomplicated everything for no reason. A lot of people are feeling this way lately. Do you think we’ve gone too far with smart technology and apps, or do you like having everything connected? I think it's gotten out of control as well.

This guy is over it with all the unnecessary apps and “smart” everything. He bought a light bulb that wants him to download an app just to turn it on. Then he goes off about appliances that beep like they just landed on the moon, fridges with iPad screens, and how ridiculous passwords have gotten. He’s basically saying we’ve overcomplicated everything for no reason. A lot of people are feeling this way lately. Do you think we’ve gone too far with smart technology and apps, or do you like having everything connected? I think it's gotten out of control as well.

End3of6Days9 (Helen) 🇺🇸

25,630 次观看 • 2 个月前

Amazon is rolling out biometric tech at shopping malls across the US, that allows you to go into a shop and pay with your hand. They are essentially showing us a sneak peak of their new mark of the beast tech 'creatively' called "Amazon One", that most of you connected the dots already that it's a reference to one world order. The fact that you are carrying biometric information at your palm and letting the Amazon handle it should be enough for concern, but many of these microchips will be a target of different hackers trying to steal your private information. Now if a man made this technology, then trust me a man will hack this technology as well. This has one and only purpose to slowly groom you to accept the microchip when it is offered to you. Since the technology advanced sufficiently to allow people to buy things using their bodies, it's a very short step to then putting that technology inside your body. Much love, Maverick.

Amazon is rolling out biometric tech at shopping malls across the US, that allows you to go into a shop and pay with your hand. They are essentially showing us a sneak peak of their new mark of the beast tech 'creatively' called "Amazon One", that most of you connected the dots already that it's a reference to one world order. The fact that you are carrying biometric information at your palm and letting the Amazon handle it should be enough for concern, but many of these microchips will be a target of different hackers trying to steal your private information. Now if a man made this technology, then trust me a man will hack this technology as well. This has one and only purpose to slowly groom you to accept the microchip when it is offered to you. Since the technology advanced sufficiently to allow people to buy things using their bodies, it's a very short step to then putting that technology inside your body. Much love, Maverick.

MAVERICK X

14,200 次观看 • 9 个月前

.Clay Travis just pitched a “crazy” idea to make Jimmy Kimmel’s show more politically balanced. This might actually make it worth watching. “I would say he [Jimmy] should say every week from now on, we’re going to have a Donald Trump voter on as a guest, and we’re going to make it a part, since this is a talk show that’s supposed to speak to all of America. “Doesn’t mean that strident politically or anything like that. But I would say you could start with Adam Carolla, his old friend on The Man Show.” Talking to the other side—what a crazy idea. If Jimmy really wants ratings for his show, this is how you get it done.

.Clay Travis just pitched a “crazy” idea to make Jimmy Kimmel’s show more politically balanced. This might actually make it worth watching. “I would say he [Jimmy] should say every week from now on, we’re going to have a Donald Trump voter on as a guest, and we’re going to make it a part, since this is a talk show that’s supposed to speak to all of America. “Doesn’t mean that strident politically or anything like that. But I would say you could start with Adam Carolla, his old friend on The Man Show.” Talking to the other side—what a crazy idea. If Jimmy really wants ratings for his show, this is how you get it done.

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

746,446 次观看 • 11 个月前

.Rob Miles is spitting fire: “People are starting from a prior in which ‘[AIs] are safe until you give me an airtight case for why they're dangerous.’ This framing is exhausting. You explain one of the 10,000 ways that AIs could be dangerous, then they explain why they don't think that specific thing would happen. Then you have to change tack, and then they say, 'your story keeps changing'... "If you're building an AGI, it's like building a Saturn V rocket [but with every human on it]. It's a complex, difficult engineering task, and you're going to try and make it aligned, which means it's going to deliver people to the moon and home again. People ask “why assume they won't just land on the Moon and return home safely?" And I'm like, because you don't know what you're doing! If you try to send people to the moon and you don't know what you're doing, your astronauts will die. [Unlike the telephone, or electricity, where you can assume it’s probably going to work out okay] I contend that ASI is more like the moon rocket. "The moon is small compared with the rest of the sky, so you don't get to the moon by default - you hit some part of the sky that isn't the moon. So, show me the plan by which you predict to specifically hit the moon." And then people say, “how do you predict that [AIs] will want bad things?” There's more bad things than good things! It's not actually a complicated argument... I'm not going to predict specifically where it off into random space your astronauts are going, but you're not going to hit the moon unless you have a really good, technically clear plan for how you do it. And if you ask these people for their plan, they don't have one. What's Yann Lecun’s plan?” "I think that if you're building an enormously powerful technology and you have a lot of uncertainty about what's going to happen, this is bad. Like, this is default unsafe. If you've got something that's going to do enormously influential things in the world, and you don't know what enormously influential things it's going to do, this thing is unsafe until you can convince me that it's safe." HOST: “That’s a good way of thinking about it - with some technologies you can assume that the default will be good or at least neutral, or that the capacity of a person to use this in a very bad way is bounded somehow. There's just only so many people you could electrocute one by one."

.Rob Miles is spitting fire: “People are starting from a prior in which ‘[AIs] are safe until you give me an airtight case for why they're dangerous.’ This framing is exhausting. You explain one of the 10,000 ways that AIs could be dangerous, then they explain why they don't think that specific thing would happen. Then you have to change tack, and then they say, 'your story keeps changing'... "If you're building an AGI, it's like building a Saturn V rocket [but with every human on it]. It's a complex, difficult engineering task, and you're going to try and make it aligned, which means it's going to deliver people to the moon and home again. People ask “why assume they won't just land on the Moon and return home safely?" And I'm like, because you don't know what you're doing! If you try to send people to the moon and you don't know what you're doing, your astronauts will die. [Unlike the telephone, or electricity, where you can assume it’s probably going to work out okay] I contend that ASI is more like the moon rocket. "The moon is small compared with the rest of the sky, so you don't get to the moon by default - you hit some part of the sky that isn't the moon. So, show me the plan by which you predict to specifically hit the moon." And then people say, “how do you predict that [AIs] will want bad things?” There's more bad things than good things! It's not actually a complicated argument... I'm not going to predict specifically where it off into random space your astronauts are going, but you're not going to hit the moon unless you have a really good, technically clear plan for how you do it. And if you ask these people for their plan, they don't have one. What's Yann Lecun’s plan?” "I think that if you're building an enormously powerful technology and you have a lot of uncertainty about what's going to happen, this is bad. Like, this is default unsafe. If you've got something that's going to do enormously influential things in the world, and you don't know what enormously influential things it's going to do, this thing is unsafe until you can convince me that it's safe." HOST: “That’s a good way of thinking about it - with some technologies you can assume that the default will be good or at least neutral, or that the capacity of a person to use this in a very bad way is bounded somehow. There's just only so many people you could electrocute one by one."

AI Notkilleveryoneism Memes ⏸️

77,378 次观看 • 3 年前