正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

TERRIFYING: Former Anthropic AI Systems Developer Jacob Coxon: “We know how to control nuclear weapons pretty much. We DON’T YET know how to control AI. This is possibly the most DANGEROUS technology that humanity has ever created. It’s basically out of science fiction.” “I think we have NO OTHER... show more

RedWave Press

247,668 subscribers

636,223 次观看 • 2 天前 •via X (Twitter)

科学技术新闻政治

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

"We know how to control nuclear weapons... We don't yet know how to control AI." Former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon, who recently left the company, is sounding the alarm on artificial intelligence, calling it "possibly the most dangerous technology that humanity has ever created." Coxon, who says he spent three years conducting research at Anthropic and OpenAI, wrote in a viral post on X that the companies are more focused on beating each other to build the most advanced AI models than they are on safety. He says an international AI arms race would be "disastrous," arguing global cooperation is the only way to manage the rapidly advancing technology. Special Report

"We know how to control nuclear weapons... We don't yet know how to control AI." Former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon, who recently left the company, is sounding the alarm on artificial intelligence, calling it "possibly the most dangerous technology that humanity has ever created." Coxon, who says he spent three years conducting research at Anthropic and OpenAI, wrote in a viral post on X that the companies are more focused on beating each other to build the most advanced AI models than they are on safety. He says an international AI arms race would be "disastrous," arguing global cooperation is the only way to manage the rapidly advancing technology. Special Report

Fox News

1,628,764 次观看 • 2 天前

This was another great question from Bret Baier tonight, with a great follow-up: Q: "What do you say to people who look at this and say the American government could throttle back some companies and set up regulations, but we have no control over what China or India does?" Jacob Coxon: "You have to think of this arms race. This technology is not ordinary technology. It’s not like other forms of innovation. This is essentially a super weapon. And I think that I expect the international community to be ready to make agreements about how to control the development of super weapon technology." Bret's follow-up Q: "So people would say, if you say it’s like an arms race, then we dealt with nuclear weapons and kind of a standoff with mutual assured destruction and worked with allies and enemies to say, 'We have got the stuff, too. Don’t think that you’re going to get away with anything.' So does that work against what you’re saying?" Coxon: "Unfortunately we know how to control nuclear weapons pretty much. We don’t yet know how to control AI. This is possibly the most dangerous technology that humanity has ever created. It’s basically out of science fiction. I think we have no other choice but to cooperate internationally..."

This was another great question from Bret Baier tonight, with a great follow-up: Q: "What do you say to people who look at this and say the American government could throttle back some companies and set up regulations, but we have no control over what China or India does?" Jacob Coxon: "You have to think of this arms race. This technology is not ordinary technology. It’s not like other forms of innovation. This is essentially a super weapon. And I think that I expect the international community to be ready to make agreements about how to control the development of super weapon technology." Bret's follow-up Q: "So people would say, if you say it’s like an arms race, then we dealt with nuclear weapons and kind of a standoff with mutual assured destruction and worked with allies and enemies to say, 'We have got the stuff, too. Don’t think that you’re going to get away with anything.' So does that work against what you’re saying?" Coxon: "Unfortunately we know how to control nuclear weapons pretty much. We don’t yet know how to control AI. This is possibly the most dangerous technology that humanity has ever created. It’s basically out of science fiction. I think we have no other choice but to cooperate internationally..."

Peter J. Hasson

34,557 次观看 • 2 天前

A former Anthropic AI systems developer is sounding the alarm on how quickly AI is advancing. Jacob Coxon says the models are getting “VERY, VERY QUICKLY” smarter, and admits we still don’t know how to properly control them. The combination of rapidly improving AI and increasingly capable cyberattacks. “When you put those two together, it basically spells disaster.” That’s a chilling warning from someone who worked on these systems.

A former Anthropic AI systems developer is sounding the alarm on how quickly AI is advancing. Jacob Coxon says the models are getting “VERY, VERY QUICKLY” smarter, and admits we still don’t know how to properly control them. The combination of rapidly improving AI and increasingly capable cyberattacks. “When you put those two together, it basically spells disaster.” That’s a chilling warning from someone who worked on these systems.

Joe Rogan Podcast News

63,102 次观看 • 2 天前

“We don’t know if AI is a force for good, but we know that The West is and we have to make sure we stay ahead of communist China in this arms race.” Republican Strategist Tricia McLaughlin says the US cannot risk slowing down its AI development. #Newsnight

“We don’t know if AI is a force for good, but we know that The West is and we have to make sure we stay ahead of communist China in this arms race.” Republican Strategist Tricia McLaughlin says the US cannot risk slowing down its AI development. #Newsnight

BBC Newsnight

23,823 次观看 • 1 天前

Rubio on Cuba: The fundamental problem Cuba has is that it has no economy, and the people who are in charge of that country and in control of it don’t know how to improve the everyday lives of their people without giving up power over the sectors they control. They want to control everything. They don’t want the people of Cuba to control anything. So they don’t know how to get themselves out of this. And to the extent that they’ve been offered opportunities to do so, they don’t seem to be able to comprehend or accept them in any way. They would much rather be in charge of a dying country than allow it to prosper.

Rubio on Cuba: The fundamental problem Cuba has is that it has no economy, and the people who are in charge of that country and in control of it don’t know how to improve the everyday lives of their people without giving up power over the sectors they control. They want to control everything. They don’t want the people of Cuba to control anything. So they don’t know how to get themselves out of this. And to the extent that they’ve been offered opportunities to do so, they don’t seem to be able to comprehend or accept them in any way. They would much rather be in charge of a dying country than allow it to prosper.

Clash Report

139,996 次观看 • 7 个月前

This is an absolutely incredible video. Hinton: “That's an issue, right. We have to think hard about how to control that.“ Reporter: “Can we?“ Hinton: “We don't know. We haven't been there yet. But we can try!“ Reporter: “That seems kind of concerning?“ Hinton: “Uh, yes!“

This is an absolutely incredible video. Hinton: “That's an issue, right. We have to think hard about how to control that.“ Reporter: “Can we?“ Hinton: “We don't know. We haven't been there yet. But we can try!“ Reporter: “That seems kind of concerning?“ Hinton: “Uh, yes!“

Jonathan Mannhart 🔎🔸

1,479,848 次观看 • 3 年前

🚨AI IS MORE DANGEROUS THAN NUKES AND NO ONE IS IN CONTROL Most people compare AI to nuclear weapons. Roman Yampolskiy says that comparison misses the real danger. Nukes still require human decisions. Someone has to launch them. Someone can stop them. Advanced AI does not work that way. Once powerful systems are deployed, they make decisions on their own. And the people who build them do not truly control what happens next. He says we did the opposite of what safety demanded. Instead of slowing down, we connected AI to the internet, open sourced it, and pushed it forward in an arms race with no serious oversight. Governments talk about regulation, but most of it never materialized. In some cases, rules were blocked before they even started. Yampolskiy’s warning is simple. With nukes, the world tried to limit the damage. With AI, we are accelerating toward something we may not be able to stop. Full conversation with Dr. Roman Yampolskiy below

🚨AI IS MORE DANGEROUS THAN NUKES AND NO ONE IS IN CONTROL Most people compare AI to nuclear weapons. Roman Yampolskiy says that comparison misses the real danger. Nukes still require human decisions. Someone has to launch them. Someone can stop them. Advanced AI does not work that way. Once powerful systems are deployed, they make decisions on their own. And the people who build them do not truly control what happens next. He says we did the opposite of what safety demanded. Instead of slowing down, we connected AI to the internet, open sourced it, and pushed it forward in an arms race with no serious oversight. Governments talk about regulation, but most of it never materialized. In some cases, rules were blocked before they even started. Yampolskiy’s warning is simple. With nukes, the world tried to limit the damage. With AI, we are accelerating toward something we may not be able to stop. Full conversation with Dr. Roman Yampolskiy below

Mario Nawfal

24,888 次观看 • 7 个月前

Elon Musk explains the deeper reason why SpaceX succeeding in AI matters for humanity’s future "It's important that we have an AI that cares about humanity, that fosters humanity and helps take us to other planets and other star systems This is why I think it's essential that SpaceX succeed not just with AI hardware, but also with AI software. I think an AI that is SpaceX's baby will be a very good AI SpaceX is a collection some of the very best humans on Earth, both in capability and in morality and goodness. We want to have an AI that is born of that capability, that morality and that goodness. I think that's very, very important So I'd like to encourage people to help out with the AI hardware on the ground, the AI software, and of course with the AI satellites Solar is going to be a very important part of that. The Terafab will be a very important part of that”

Elon Musk explains the deeper reason why SpaceX succeeding in AI matters for humanity’s future "It's important that we have an AI that cares about humanity, that fosters humanity and helps take us to other planets and other star systems This is why I think it's essential that SpaceX succeed not just with AI hardware, but also with AI software. I think an AI that is SpaceX's baby will be a very good AI SpaceX is a collection some of the very best humans on Earth, both in capability and in morality and goodness. We want to have an AI that is born of that capability, that morality and that goodness. I think that's very, very important So I'd like to encourage people to help out with the AI hardware on the ground, the AI software, and of course with the AI satellites Solar is going to be a very important part of that. The Terafab will be a very important part of that”

X Freeze

29,610 次观看 • 1 个月前

ELON MUSK: The future is fundamentally AI and Robots. “Our AI revenue will exceed all other SpaceX revenue probably in September, like next month, and will significantly exceed all other SpaceX revenue in the fourth quarter. So, AI has become an extremely important part of SpaceX’s future. I think it’s actually vital that we succeed in AI, not just in hardware, but also in software. So, yeah, the future is fundamentally AI and robots. Assuming civilization continues to progress, I think that AI will probably, the amount of digital intelligence will probably be more than a trillion times the amount of biological intelligence. So, not sort of equal to human intelligence, but probably a trillion times higher. I’d say a billion times higher than the amount of artificial intelligence that we have today. I’d say a billion times is an easy prediction, and probably a trillion. So, as you harness more and more of the sun’s energy, the ability to turn that into intelligence is fundamentally a digital computer thing, because it’s pretty hard for humans to go live in deep space without any support. I mean, some of the math is interesting to think about, which is that if you increased civilizational energy usage, the amount of energy that we have harnessed as a civilization by a factor of a million, you would still be using much less than one millionth of the sun’s energy. Now, most of this is in deep space, obviously, but the future is very much AI, very much, and I suppose it was always going to be that way. But it’s important that we have an AI that cares about humanity, that fosters humanity and helps take us to other planets and other star systems, and this is why I think it’s essential that SpaceX succeed, not just with AI hardware, but also with AI software.”

ELON MUSK: The future is fundamentally AI and Robots. “Our AI revenue will exceed all other SpaceX revenue probably in September, like next month, and will significantly exceed all other SpaceX revenue in the fourth quarter. So, AI has become an extremely important part of SpaceX’s future. I think it’s actually vital that we succeed in AI, not just in hardware, but also in software. So, yeah, the future is fundamentally AI and robots. Assuming civilization continues to progress, I think that AI will probably, the amount of digital intelligence will probably be more than a trillion times the amount of biological intelligence. So, not sort of equal to human intelligence, but probably a trillion times higher. I’d say a billion times higher than the amount of artificial intelligence that we have today. I’d say a billion times is an easy prediction, and probably a trillion. So, as you harness more and more of the sun’s energy, the ability to turn that into intelligence is fundamentally a digital computer thing, because it’s pretty hard for humans to go live in deep space without any support. I mean, some of the math is interesting to think about, which is that if you increased civilizational energy usage, the amount of energy that we have harnessed as a civilization by a factor of a million, you would still be using much less than one millionth of the sun’s energy. Now, most of this is in deep space, obviously, but the future is very much AI, very much, and I suppose it was always going to be that way. But it’s important that we have an AI that cares about humanity, that fosters humanity and helps take us to other planets and other star systems, and this is why I think it’s essential that SpaceX succeed, not just with AI hardware, but also with AI software.”

DogeDesigner

67,944 次观看 • 1 个月前

Still believe AI isn’t dangerous? It’s just a machine that can perform some parlor tricks? This seems pretty dang real to me and yet right now we know that it is AI. But very soon, none of us will. The tech billionaires know this and are leaning into it. It’s about control.

Still believe AI isn’t dangerous? It’s just a machine that can perform some parlor tricks? This seems pretty dang real to me and yet right now we know that it is AI. But very soon, none of us will. The tech billionaires know this and are leaning into it. It’s about control.

MAGA Cult Slayer

1,942,998 次观看 • 8 个月前

📁 Roman Yampolskiy, AI safety researcher, says humanity has never built agents before, only tools. Fire, cars, nuclear weapons, a human was always in control. Now we are creating systems that make decisions on their own. Once autonomy scales, there may be no one left to hold accountable.

📁 Roman Yampolskiy, AI safety researcher, says humanity has never built agents before, only tools. Fire, cars, nuclear weapons, a human was always in control. Now we are creating systems that make decisions on their own. Once autonomy scales, there may be no one left to hold accountable.

Jon Hernandez

11,773 次观看 • 6 个月前

The ‘godfather’ of AI Geoffrey Hinton warns it’s not inconceivable AI could lead to the extinction of the human race. AI researcher & expert Connor Leahy Connor Leahy fears it’s worse than that: “It’s quite likely, unfortunately.” “We do not know how to control these things.”

The ‘godfather’ of AI Geoffrey Hinton warns it’s not inconceivable AI could lead to the extinction of the human race. AI researcher & expert Connor Leahy Connor Leahy fears it’s worse than that: “It’s quite likely, unfortunately.” “We do not know how to control these things.”

Christiane Amanpour

1,106,730 次观看 • 3 年前

One reason I stay a bit quite about AI these few months. I can’t find my voice to say this right. I’ll try. — What has my AI found just in the millions of never saved TV from the 1980s-1990s? The simple commercial, I have the largest collection known in the world is a reflection of hyper nuanced humanity. Frail and over optimistic as it is, it shows the sprit of humanity in ways that self-hating 2010 Internet sewage training AI can not. It is interesting to have dark humor, when you know the soul of the person with the humor. It is not interesting to have dark humor from an AI that was not trained on the human spirit. The human sprit is not math, coding and science. This is the OUTCOME of a human sprit. We are training AI backwards and we just can’t see it yet, but we will. I am doing may best as “some posted on X” who has no currency in the “big boy” AI world to save the human sprit. We will need it one day and most of this training material is being erased, trillions of bytes daily. This is the secret to truthful AI. This is the secret to AI that LOVES humanity. We don’t get this right soon, there will be little chance. The data is… Almost gone.

One reason I stay a bit quite about AI these few months. I can’t find my voice to say this right. I’ll try. — What has my AI found just in the millions of never saved TV from the 1980s-1990s? The simple commercial, I have the largest collection known in the world is a reflection of hyper nuanced humanity. Frail and over optimistic as it is, it shows the sprit of humanity in ways that self-hating 2010 Internet sewage training AI can not. It is interesting to have dark humor, when you know the soul of the person with the humor. It is not interesting to have dark humor from an AI that was not trained on the human spirit. The human sprit is not math, coding and science. This is the OUTCOME of a human sprit. We are training AI backwards and we just can’t see it yet, but we will. I am doing may best as “some posted on X” who has no currency in the “big boy” AI world to save the human sprit. We will need it one day and most of this training material is being erased, trillions of bytes daily. This is the secret to truthful AI. This is the secret to AI that LOVES humanity. We don’t get this right soon, there will be little chance. The data is… Almost gone.

Brian Roemmele

123,518 次观看 • 1 年前

(mountain vs. sea) 🐰 wait a minute this is a mind game, because i know we’re both going to have the same answer? we know our answer will be the same so how about the person who is usually the more considerate one will choose the other option... 🦊 okay 🐰 one, two, three— 🦊🐰 sea! 🧸 so basically neither of you were considerate of each other in the slightest 🦊 no it’s because we each thought the other would be the considerate one 🐰 yeah i thought yeonjun hyung would pick the other option 🦊 we actually match pretty well though, don’t we?

(mountain vs. sea) 🐰 wait a minute this is a mind game, because i know we’re both going to have the same answer? we know our answer will be the same so how about the person who is usually the more considerate one will choose the other option... 🦊 okay 🐰 one, two, three— 🦊🐰 sea! 🧸 so basically neither of you were considerate of each other in the slightest 🦊 no it’s because we each thought the other would be the considerate one 🐰 yeah i thought yeonjun hyung would pick the other option 🦊 we actually match pretty well though, don’t we?

💿

14,022 次观看 • 1 年前

Jen Psaki: “Some have projected that [socialism] is the type of platform that would work in other parts of the country… Do you think that [socialism] is a platform that would work for other candidates running in other parts of the country?” Zohran Mamdani: “Absolutely, I think ultimately this is a campaign about inequality. And you don’t have to live in the most expensive city in the country to have experienced that inequality because it’s a national issue.” “Part of how we got to this point is through the endorsements of Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Senator Bernie Sanders, who have been leading this fight against oligarchy across the country.” This is terrifying!

Jen Psaki: “Some have projected that [socialism] is the type of platform that would work in other parts of the country… Do you think that [socialism] is a platform that would work for other candidates running in other parts of the country?” Zohran Mamdani: “Absolutely, I think ultimately this is a campaign about inequality. And you don’t have to live in the most expensive city in the country to have experienced that inequality because it’s a national issue.” “Part of how we got to this point is through the endorsements of Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Senator Bernie Sanders, who have been leading this fight against oligarchy across the country.” This is terrifying!

RedWave Press

762,114 次观看 • 1 年前

The problem in our country today is we don’t know how to talk to each other. We know how to scream through a phone or even assassinate, but don’t know how to have a real conversation. Talking politics & faith isn’t taboo. It’s essential. We must Make America Talk Again!

The problem in our country today is we don’t know how to talk to each other. We know how to scream through a phone or even assassinate, but don’t know how to have a real conversation. Talking politics & faith isn’t taboo. It’s essential. We must Make America Talk Again!

Brilyn Hollyhand

501,817 次观看 • 10 个月前

Jensen to AI Leaders: “We have to be far more thoughtful” when communicating to the public Jensen Huang: “(AI) is not a biological being. It is not alien. It is not conscious. It is computer software.” “We say things like, ‘We don't understand it at all.’ It is not true. We understand a lot of things about this technology.” Chamath: “If you were in the seat in the boardroom of Anthropic over that whole scuttlebutt with the Department of War, what do you think you would've told Dario and that team to do, maybe, differently to try to change some of this outcome and some of this perception?” Jensen: “The first thing that I would say about Anthropic is, first of all, the technology is incredible. We are a large consumer of Anthropic technology.” “The desire to warn people about the capability of the technology is also really terrific.” “We just have to make sure that we understand that the world has a spectrum, and that warning is good, scaring is less good because this technology is too important to us.” “I think that it is fine to predict the future, but we need to be a little bit more circumspect. We need to have a little bit more humility, that, in fact, we can't completely predict the future.” “And to say things that are quite extreme, quite catastrophic, that there's no evidence of it happening, could be more damaging than people think.” “And of course we are technology leaders.” “There was a time when nobody listened to us, but now because technology is so important in the social fabric, such an important industry, so important to national security, our words do matter.” “And I think we have to be much more circumspect, we have to be more moderate, we have to be more balanced, we have to be far more thoughtful.”

Jensen to AI Leaders: “We have to be far more thoughtful” when communicating to the public Jensen Huang: “(AI) is not a biological being. It is not alien. It is not conscious. It is computer software.” “We say things like, ‘We don't understand it at all.’ It is not true. We understand a lot of things about this technology.” Chamath: “If you were in the seat in the boardroom of Anthropic over that whole scuttlebutt with the Department of War, what do you think you would've told Dario and that team to do, maybe, differently to try to change some of this outcome and some of this perception?” Jensen: “The first thing that I would say about Anthropic is, first of all, the technology is incredible. We are a large consumer of Anthropic technology.” “The desire to warn people about the capability of the technology is also really terrific.” “We just have to make sure that we understand that the world has a spectrum, and that warning is good, scaring is less good because this technology is too important to us.” “I think that it is fine to predict the future, but we need to be a little bit more circumspect. We need to have a little bit more humility, that, in fact, we can't completely predict the future.” “And to say things that are quite extreme, quite catastrophic, that there's no evidence of it happening, could be more damaging than people think.” “And of course we are technology leaders.” “There was a time when nobody listened to us, but now because technology is so important in the social fabric, such an important industry, so important to national security, our words do matter.” “And I think we have to be much more circumspect, we have to be more moderate, we have to be more balanced, we have to be far more thoughtful.”

The All-In Podcast

57,581 次观看 • 5 个月前

‘We don’t know if it will work, but let’s try it’ - retired US Army General Jack Keane suggests resuming arms supplies to Ukraine. ‘Part of the peace process is using leverage to change someone’s behavior. We have to do the same with Russia. We don’t know if it will work. Let’s be honest: we don’t know. But we do know that it hasn’t worked. Diplomatic negotiations just don’t work. So leverage has to be there, I think, first and foremost: military aid, air defense systems, and other things that are sorely needed. We have to use leverage on Putin the same way we used it on Zelensky. We don’t know, frankly, if it will work. But it’s definitely worth trying right now, because diplomatic negotiations are getting us nowhere.’

‘We don’t know if it will work, but let’s try it’ - retired US Army General Jack Keane suggests resuming arms supplies to Ukraine. ‘Part of the peace process is using leverage to change someone’s behavior. We have to do the same with Russia. We don’t know if it will work. Let’s be honest: we don’t know. But we do know that it hasn’t worked. Diplomatic negotiations just don’t work. So leverage has to be there, I think, first and foremost: military aid, air defense systems, and other things that are sorely needed. We have to use leverage on Putin the same way we used it on Zelensky. We don’t know, frankly, if it will work. But it’s definitely worth trying right now, because diplomatic negotiations are getting us nowhere.’

Zlatti71

64,924 次观看 • 1 年前