Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

TESLA'S CASHFLOW FIREWORK Boom! Tesla’s igniting the cash flow chart for pure EV makers since day one! Everyone else? Deep in the red. The fireworks show: •⁠ ⁠Tesla: Lone wolf above the line, raking in $16.1 billion. •⁠ ⁠Lucid: Down with a staggering $12.4 billion. •⁠ ⁠Ford: A whopping... show more

Mario Nawfal

2,254,377 subscribers

121,165 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Finance Science & Technology

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

The world just paid $2 trillion for a rocket company that lost $4.9 billion last year. And the rockets are not why it lost the money. They are the only part making any. SpaceX went public Friday, the largest IPO in history. Up 19%, a $2 trillion valuation, Elon Musk the first trillionaire. Then you open the filing. Three businesses sit inside it. Starlink, the satellites, brought in $11.4 billion, 61% of all revenue, and $4.4 billion in profit. It is the only piece that earns a dollar. The rockets that land themselves run a small loss reinvesting in Starship. And the AI arm, Grok plus the app once called Twitter, folded in this February, lost $6.4 billion in a single year on $12.7 billion of spending. Read that again. The satellites pay for everything. The AI loses more than the satellites make. And the AI is the part the market fell in love with. It gets bolder. The prospectus claims a total market of $28.5 trillion, the largest any company has ever put in a filing. Larger than the GDP of the United States. That is the number underwriting a $2 trillion price tag built on a division bleeding $6 billion a year. Now the structure. About 4% of the company trades. That sliver sets the price for all of it. Musk is locked up for 366 days and holds roughly 80% of the votes. The public bought a company they cannot steer, priced on the one segment losing the most. This is the whole year in one ticker. The profit is satellites. The story is AI. The market bought the story. The rockets were never the risk. The risk is a $2 trillion price resting on the one bet that has yet to make a cent.

The world just paid $2 trillion for a rocket company that lost $4.9 billion last year. And the rockets are not why it lost the money. They are the only part making any. SpaceX went public Friday, the largest IPO in history. Up 19%, a $2 trillion valuation, Elon Musk the first trillionaire. Then you open the filing. Three businesses sit inside it. Starlink, the satellites, brought in $11.4 billion, 61% of all revenue, and $4.4 billion in profit. It is the only piece that earns a dollar. The rockets that land themselves run a small loss reinvesting in Starship. And the AI arm, Grok plus the app once called Twitter, folded in this February, lost $6.4 billion in a single year on $12.7 billion of spending. Read that again. The satellites pay for everything. The AI loses more than the satellites make. And the AI is the part the market fell in love with. It gets bolder. The prospectus claims a total market of $28.5 trillion, the largest any company has ever put in a filing. Larger than the GDP of the United States. That is the number underwriting a $2 trillion price tag built on a division bleeding $6 billion a year. Now the structure. About 4% of the company trades. That sliver sets the price for all of it. Musk is locked up for 366 days and holds roughly 80% of the votes. The public bought a company they cannot steer, priced on the one segment losing the most. This is the whole year in one ticker. The profit is satellites. The story is AI. The market bought the story. The rockets were never the risk. The risk is a $2 trillion price resting on the one bet that has yet to make a cent.

Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡

721,719 views • 1 month ago

Left: Fasial Islam, "The budget hole the Treasury are trying to bridge with tax rises is £40 billion a year." Right: "Brexit costs the government £40 billion a year in lost tax revenue" A remarkable coincidence that the budget hole Labour have found equates to the loss in tax revenues from trade with the EU caused by Brexit If Labour joined the EU Single Market, this problem goes away But because Labour will keep the UK out of the EU Single Market, we either have tax rises or fewer services The only third option is for Labour to borrow to invest, which wouldn't be a bad idea. But any reduction in public services is squarely down to Brexit In 2016, Boris Johnson and the Brexiters blamed the EU for a lack of public services in the UK. How ironic that now without the EU Single Market we either raise taxes, or borrow further, to fund public services What a shambles

Left: Fasial Islam, "The budget hole the Treasury are trying to bridge with tax rises is £40 billion a year." Right: "Brexit costs the government £40 billion a year in lost tax revenue" A remarkable coincidence that the budget hole Labour have found equates to the loss in tax revenues from trade with the EU caused by Brexit If Labour joined the EU Single Market, this problem goes away But because Labour will keep the UK out of the EU Single Market, we either have tax rises or fewer services The only third option is for Labour to borrow to invest, which wouldn't be a bad idea. But any reduction in public services is squarely down to Brexit In 2016, Boris Johnson and the Brexiters blamed the EU for a lack of public services in the UK. How ironic that now without the EU Single Market we either raise taxes, or borrow further, to fund public services What a shambles

Farrukh

96,509 views • 1 year ago

The companies racing Elon Musk to build AI are paying him more than 2 billion dollars a month to do it. Anthropic pays SpaceX 1.25 billion dollars a month. Google pays 920 million. They are not buying rockets. They are renting compute, the scarce Nvidia chips that train frontier models, from a data center in Memphis called Colossus that Musk's rocket company now owns. SpaceX folded xAI into itself in February, and with it the 220,000 chips built to train Grok. Then it rented them to Grok's rivals. Anthropic took the entire first building. Google leased 110,000 more. The contracts signed so far run past 80 billion dollars. SpaceX is no longer a rocket company that dabbles in AI. It is one of the largest AI compute landlords on Earth, and its biggest tenants are the rivals it is trying to beat. Musk is not choosing between building AI on the ground and building it in space. He is using one to fund the other. The 80 billion in ground contracts is the cash engine. Starmind, the million-satellite constellation built to leave the ground behind, is what the cash builds. So the rivals are financing his exit from the planet. Every dollar Anthropic and Google pay for compute in Memphis helps fund the orbital network designed to strand them on the surface. They are paying the toll on the road they are trying to win, and the toll is building Musk a road no one else can reach. The piece works out who is really renting from whom.

The companies racing Elon Musk to build AI are paying him more than 2 billion dollars a month to do it. Anthropic pays SpaceX 1.25 billion dollars a month. Google pays 920 million. They are not buying rockets. They are renting compute, the scarce Nvidia chips that train frontier models, from a data center in Memphis called Colossus that Musk's rocket company now owns. SpaceX folded xAI into itself in February, and with it the 220,000 chips built to train Grok. Then it rented them to Grok's rivals. Anthropic took the entire first building. Google leased 110,000 more. The contracts signed so far run past 80 billion dollars. SpaceX is no longer a rocket company that dabbles in AI. It is one of the largest AI compute landlords on Earth, and its biggest tenants are the rivals it is trying to beat. Musk is not choosing between building AI on the ground and building it in space. He is using one to fund the other. The 80 billion in ground contracts is the cash engine. Starmind, the million-satellite constellation built to leave the ground behind, is what the cash builds. So the rivals are financing his exit from the planet. Every dollar Anthropic and Google pay for compute in Memphis helps fund the orbital network designed to strand them on the surface. They are paying the toll on the road they are trying to win, and the toll is building Musk a road no one else can reach. The piece works out who is really renting from whom.

Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡

97,820 views • 1 month ago

Donald Trump just claimed again that the US donated 350 Billion dollars to Ukraine. You are being lied to by your sitting President on the United States of America. Let’s break this down with the facts rather than these random numbers Donnie is trying to sell you after finishing his nap. Independent tracking by the Kiel Institute for the World Economy estimated that between January 24, 2022 and June 30, 2025, U.S committed aid to Ukraine amounted to about $134 billion, not $350 billion….it gets better. Already a $166 Billion dollar difference than what Trump claims. Please understand committed and allocated isn’t the same as what has actually been delivered. 56% ($74.9 billion USD) of all funds “allocated not supplied” were for weapons. HOWEVER the $74.9 of weapons (Allocated and not necessarily all provided) were independently evaluated and subsequently massively overvalued by the US Government. The True cost of lethal aid was predicted to cost around $18.3 billion even by United States weapons pricing. One reason: when equipment is drawn from existing U.S. inventories “drawdown”, the official accounting often uses replacement-cost valuations, rather than the original (or depreciated) cost. To put it plainly, if you give Ukraine one air defense system, you account for the cost of a brand new air defense system to take its place not for the cost of the 45 year old system that was handed over. Many of the weapons provided to Ukraine was soon to be destroyed by the US forces or decommissioned. ALSO it’s important to take note as we all know the American arms industry massively overvalues the cost of all system due to its industry. America prices its systems at anything from 30-100% higher than the cost of European equivalents with the same capabilities. The true value of these weapons could have been anything from $5.49 billion-$18.3 Billion. Even with a significantly lower number of this, Independent analysts suggested that a large share perhaps 60% or more of the nominal military-aid dollar amount may effectively stay within U.S. defense industry…..60%! Out of aid provided $54 Billions dollars was Financial aid consisting of grants, loans, budget support. Of the US $54.0 billion in U.S. financial-aid allocations for that period, about US $19.3 billion was provided as loans, while roughly US $29.7 billion was given as grants. 🚨🚨That means approximately 39–40% of the U.S. financial aid during that time was structured as loans or other repayable/concessional financing.🚨🚨 The US $3.4 Billion in Humanitarian aid. Here is another kicker. After everything I have just said. According to United states press briefings: the U.S. had only delivered around 83% of promised ammunition, about 67% of pledged air-defence systems, and roughly 60% of committed bombs, artillery rounds, other munitions. $5.49 billion-$18.3 Billion $29.7 billion $3.4 Billion That $350 Billion is looking more like it was 38.59- 51.4 billion to me Donnie. And it’s a funny number that. An estimated $30–60 billion dollars was spent by Americans allies fighting alongside the US after 9/11. This included Ukraine. We never once complained about this loss or the lives we lost. Absolutely shameful.

Bricktop_NAFO

106,395 views • 7 months ago

$1,000,000,000+ in tokenized stock TVL. In less than 8 months, Ondo Global Markets became the first tokenized stock & ETF platform to reach $1 billion in TVL, one of the fastest climbs in the history of onchain finance. Ondo Global Markets has established itself as the standard for tokenized stocks and ETFs: → Over 70% market share → Tens of thousands of holders → Over $18B in cumulative volume → Live across Solana, BNB Chain & Ethereum Since launch, the platform has scaled to 260+ tokenized stocks & ETFs, expanding access to the world's most in-demand sectors across AI, biotech, defense, energy, and more. The pace of tokenization is accelerating with every new asset class. What took stablecoins and tokenized Treasuries years, Ondo tokenized stocks and ETFs achieved in under a year, faster than any asset class before them. This milestone reflects a generational shift in how global investors access capital markets, one that is more transparent, more accessible, and more efficient than the legacy system. One billion down. Trillions to go.

$1,000,000,000+ in tokenized stock TVL. In less than 8 months, Ondo Global Markets became the first tokenized stock & ETF platform to reach $1 billion in TVL, one of the fastest climbs in the history of onchain finance. Ondo Global Markets has established itself as the standard for tokenized stocks and ETFs: → Over 70% market share → Tens of thousands of holders → Over $18B in cumulative volume → Live across Solana, BNB Chain & Ethereum Since launch, the platform has scaled to 260+ tokenized stocks & ETFs, expanding access to the world's most in-demand sectors across AI, biotech, defense, energy, and more. The pace of tokenization is accelerating with every new asset class. What took stablecoins and tokenized Treasuries years, Ondo tokenized stocks and ETFs achieved in under a year, faster than any asset class before them. This milestone reflects a generational shift in how global investors access capital markets, one that is more transparent, more accessible, and more efficient than the legacy system. One billion down. Trillions to go.

Ondo Finance

391,528 views • 2 months ago

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Iran is losing the war on volume and winning it on accuracy... The numbers tell a story nobody in Washington wants to hear. Iran's daily launch rate collapsed 90% from day one. But its hit rate jumped from 4% to 24% and keeps climbing. Fewer shots, more damage. The shift is deliberate. Tehran shifted from mass barrages of ballistic missiles, which Patriot batteries eat for breakfast, to cheap Shahed drones that slip under radar and cluster warheads that shatter into dozens of bomblets no interceptor can chase. The damage bill tells the rest: -Three F-15s downed by friendly fire. -An F-35 hit. -Twelve+ Reapers lost. -Five tankers damaged. -A billion-dollar radar destroyed. -The Ford carrier sidelined in Greece. Total cost: up to $2.9 billion in equipment alone. Source: WSJ, JPost

🇺🇸🇮🇷 Iran is losing the war on volume and winning it on accuracy... The numbers tell a story nobody in Washington wants to hear. Iran's daily launch rate collapsed 90% from day one. But its hit rate jumped from 4% to 24% and keeps climbing. Fewer shots, more damage. The shift is deliberate. Tehran shifted from mass barrages of ballistic missiles, which Patriot batteries eat for breakfast, to cheap Shahed drones that slip under radar and cluster warheads that shatter into dozens of bomblets no interceptor can chase. The damage bill tells the rest: -Three F-15s downed by friendly fire. -An F-35 hit. -Twelve+ Reapers lost. -Five tankers damaged. -A billion-dollar radar destroyed. -The Ford carrier sidelined in Greece. Total cost: up to $2.9 billion in equipment alone. Source: WSJ, JPost

Mario Nawfal

977,919 views • 4 months ago

STRIPE-OWNED BRIDGE GOES LIVE WITH CELO SUPPORT Bridge Bridge, which is owned by the Stripe payments giant, today added support for leading Ethereum L2 Celo. Bridge's decision to extend its stablecoin orchestration platform to $CELO is no coincidence, the network boasting some incredible metrics already... • 1.3 billion total transactions • >$65 billion in stablecoin volume since March '25 • 25 native stablecoin assets on the chain ... and many more besides. According to an official release, Celo's emphasis on stablecoins dates back some six years to its launch in 2020, well before other networks adopted the stablecoin narrative. A clear case study when it comes to stablecoin adoption on Celo is MiniPay - Opera's self-custodial wallet platform, which has already driven a staggering 400 million stablecoin transactions on the network.

STRIPE-OWNED BRIDGE GOES LIVE WITH CELO SUPPORT Bridge Bridge, which is owned by the Stripe payments giant, today added support for leading Ethereum L2 Celo. Bridge's decision to extend its stablecoin orchestration platform to $CELO is no coincidence, the network boasting some incredible metrics already... • 1.3 billion total transactions • >$65 billion in stablecoin volume since March '25 • 25 native stablecoin assets on the chain ... and many more besides. According to an official release, Celo's emphasis on stablecoins dates back some six years to its launch in 2020, well before other networks adopted the stablecoin narrative. A clear case study when it comes to stablecoin adoption on Celo is MiniPay - Opera's self-custodial wallet platform, which has already driven a staggering 400 million stablecoin transactions on the network.

BSCN

11,303 views • 2 months ago

I’ve built a background daemon that connects to Linear for one of my enterprise clients (multi-billion company). It runs autonomous AI workflows: – Creates PRDs from tickets – Waits for human review – Implements, verifies, and opens PRs automatically Built with LangGraph for orchestration, Codex + Claude for deep code understanding, direct LLM's API calls (via OpenRouter) for more deterministic tasks. It’s pretty cool watching the whole flow execute live in the console ⚡️

I’ve built a background daemon that connects to Linear for one of my enterprise clients (multi-billion company). It runs autonomous AI workflows: – Creates PRDs from tickets – Waits for human review – Implements, verifies, and opens PRs automatically Built with LangGraph for orchestration, Codex + Claude for deep code understanding, direct LLM's API calls (via OpenRouter) for more deterministic tasks. It’s pretty cool watching the whole flow execute live in the console ⚡️

Krzysztof Zabłocki

17,019 views • 9 months ago

KOREA OWNS MORE $SPCX THAN ALL OF WALL STREET COMBINED Yes, you read that right Yes, the largest holder of $SPCX is not the USA Let me show you the math: - Mirae Asset (South Korean fund): 26,000,000 Shares - Swedbank (Sweden): 3,560,000 Shares - Everyone else: under 1,200,000 Shares One Korean firm holds 7x more than the second largest owner on the planet At $113 per share that's roughly $2,950,000,000 No headlines. No CNBC segment. No viral post about it Just quiet accumulation while everyone was looking elsewhere So why Korea? Here's what I think is happening Mirae Asset manages $600 billion globally. At that scale you don't accidentally build a $3 billion position in one name They're not buying SpaceX. They're buying Starlink - the only communication infrastructure on earth that no government can shut down. And Korea understands better than most what it means to depend on communication infrastructure you don't control This isn't a tech trade. This is a strategic position disguised as a stock pick American funds are still running DCF models on rocket launches Korean money already made the call

KOREA OWNS MORE $SPCX THAN ALL OF WALL STREET COMBINED Yes, you read that right Yes, the largest holder of $SPCX is not the USA Let me show you the math: - Mirae Asset (South Korean fund): 26,000,000 Shares - Swedbank (Sweden): 3,560,000 Shares - Everyone else: under 1,200,000 Shares One Korean firm holds 7x more than the second largest owner on the planet At $113 per share that's roughly $2,950,000,000 No headlines. No CNBC segment. No viral post about it Just quiet accumulation while everyone was looking elsewhere So why Korea? Here's what I think is happening Mirae Asset manages $600 billion globally. At that scale you don't accidentally build a $3 billion position in one name They're not buying SpaceX. They're buying Starlink - the only communication infrastructure on earth that no government can shut down. And Korea understands better than most what it means to depend on communication infrastructure you don't control This isn't a tech trade. This is a strategic position disguised as a stock pick American funds are still running DCF models on rocket launches Korean money already made the call

bee🐝

221,339 views • 3 days ago

$I designed the WLFI governance vote. You may remember me. Last month I built the freeze function. The one where a single anonymous wallet can lock any token holder's assets at any time for any reason without notice or appeal. Justin Sun called it a backdoor. We called it compliance. We sued him. He sued us back. One billion dollars. His lawyers filed on April 22nd. That was phase one. Individual control. One wallet. One victim. One freeze. Phase two is collective. I needed a mechanism that would extract consent from 18,000 holders simultaneously, without anyone afterward claiming they didn't agree, without anyone pointing to a single moment when force was applied, and without anyone identifying a perpetrator, because the perpetrator would be the architecture itself. The legal team said this was important. As mentioned, I've already designed it. They asked what I called it. I said governance. We submitted 62.3 billion tokens to a ballot. The proposal: release all vesting schedules. Early supporters receive their 17 billion on a two-year cliff, with a two-year vest. Founders receive their 45.2 billion on a two-year cliff plus three-year vest with a ten percent burn. The balloting mechanism is elegant. If you accept, your holdings will be released on the published schedule. If you decline, your holdings remain frozen. Indefinitely. No timeline. No appeals process. No alternative proposal. No counteroffer. No exit. I presented this to the governance committee. Three people. All founders. They approved it in eleven minutes. I timed it because I was curious. Eleven minutes to design consent for sixty-two billion tokens. That's due diligence. 99.5% accepted. I am told this represents overwhelming community consensus. I designed the mechanism where declining means your money stays frozen forever. I am told the 99.5% approval rate proves the community supports us. Those are both true. They are also the same sentence. I put both in the press release. Four wallets controlled 40% of the total ballot. One address held 13%. Quorum required one billion. The largest participant exceeded quorum alone. We set the threshold. We also hold the addresses. The token was $0.23 in January. It trades at eight cents. Sixty-five percent decline. The investors voted to unlock assets worth one-third of what they paid. But they voted yes because the alternative was those assets staying locked forever at one-third of what they paid. I designed both options. One is loss. The other is permanent loss. They chose loss. That's participation. On the governance forum, one holder wrote: "There is no democracy. The system is a joke." Another wrote: "I'm going to put these bastards in jail." A third posted a single word: "WTF." All three accepted the proposal. I verified their wallet signatures personally. The one who promised jail voted yes fourteen minutes after his post. I have the timestamp. I keep all the timestamps. We burned 4.5 billion from the founder pool. Ten percent of our allocation. The press release said meaningful sacrifice. The communications team wanted unprecedented sacrifice. I suggested meaningful. Unprecedented implies it won't happen again. Meaningful implies nothing. Our remaining allocation after the burn. Forty point seven billion at eight cents. Three point two billion dollars. We sacrificed $360 million in locked, unsellable supply. We retained $3.2 billion that now releases on schedule. The ratio of sacrifice to retention is 1:9. I call that generosity. The press release called it alignment with the community. The community had no choice but to align back. That's sacrifice. The investors paid between $0.015 and $0.05 per token. At eight cents, some are technically in profit, sixty to four hundred percent above their entry, and they won't file lawsuits because you don't sue when you're up and because the legal costs would exceed their holdings and because by the time discovery begins the token will trade at fractions of a cent and there will be nothing to recover from anyone. They will also sell the moment their tokens unlock. All of them. Simultaneously. Which will push the price below five cents. Which means nobody is in profit. Which means nobody files lawsuits. Because there is nothing left to recover. I designed that sequence too. That's vesting. Phase one takes one wallet at a time. Phase two captures 18,000 addresses simultaneously, each of them clicking yes on the identical ballot under the identical terms I wrote, in language simple enough for a compliance officer to approve and opaque enough for a retail buyer to mistake for democracy. Same coercion. Different magnitude. Both listed under governance on the project website. Sun's billion-dollar complaint characterizes the freeze function as "a unilateral deprivation of property rights." The ballot proves otherwise. It was not unilateral. We asked. Ninety-nine point five percent said yes. Under the specific condition that saying no meant keeping nothing. That's consensus.$

I designed the WLFI governance vote. You may remember me. Last month I built the freeze function. The one where a single anonymous wallet can lock any token holder's assets at any time for any reason without notice or appeal. Justin Sun called it a backdoor. We called it compliance. We sued him. He sued us back. One billion dollars. His lawyers filed on April 22nd. That was phase one. Individual control. One wallet. One victim. One freeze. Phase two is collective. I needed a mechanism that would extract consent from 18,000 holders simultaneously, without anyone afterward claiming they didn't agree, without anyone pointing to a single moment when force was applied, and without anyone identifying a perpetrator, because the perpetrator would be the architecture itself. The legal team said this was important. As mentioned, I've already designed it. They asked what I called it. I said governance. We submitted 62.3 billion tokens to a ballot. The proposal: release all vesting schedules. Early supporters receive their 17 billion on a two-year cliff, with a two-year vest. Founders receive their 45.2 billion on a two-year cliff plus three-year vest with a ten percent burn. The balloting mechanism is elegant. If you accept, your holdings will be released on the published schedule. If you decline, your holdings remain frozen. Indefinitely. No timeline. No appeals process. No alternative proposal. No counteroffer. No exit. I presented this to the governance committee. Three people. All founders. They approved it in eleven minutes. I timed it because I was curious. Eleven minutes to design consent for sixty-two billion tokens. That's due diligence. 99.5% accepted. I am told this represents overwhelming community consensus. I designed the mechanism where declining means your money stays frozen forever. I am told the 99.5% approval rate proves the community supports us. Those are both true. They are also the same sentence. I put both in the press release. Four wallets controlled 40% of the total ballot. One address held 13%. Quorum required one billion. The largest participant exceeded quorum alone. We set the threshold. We also hold the addresses. The token was $0.23 in January. It trades at eight cents. Sixty-five percent decline. The investors voted to unlock assets worth one-third of what they paid. But they voted yes because the alternative was those assets staying locked forever at one-third of what they paid. I designed both options. One is loss. The other is permanent loss. They chose loss. That's participation. On the governance forum, one holder wrote: "There is no democracy. The system is a joke." Another wrote: "I'm going to put these bastards in jail." A third posted a single word: "WTF." All three accepted the proposal. I verified their wallet signatures personally. The one who promised jail voted yes fourteen minutes after his post. I have the timestamp. I keep all the timestamps. We burned 4.5 billion from the founder pool. Ten percent of our allocation. The press release said meaningful sacrifice. The communications team wanted unprecedented sacrifice. I suggested meaningful. Unprecedented implies it won't happen again. Meaningful implies nothing. Our remaining allocation after the burn. Forty point seven billion at eight cents. Three point two billion dollars. We sacrificed $360 million in locked, unsellable supply. We retained $3.2 billion that now releases on schedule. The ratio of sacrifice to retention is 1:9. I call that generosity. The press release called it alignment with the community. The community had no choice but to align back. That's sacrifice. The investors paid between $0.015 and $0.05 per token. At eight cents, some are technically in profit, sixty to four hundred percent above their entry, and they won't file lawsuits because you don't sue when you're up and because the legal costs would exceed their holdings and because by the time discovery begins the token will trade at fractions of a cent and there will be nothing to recover from anyone. They will also sell the moment their tokens unlock. All of them. Simultaneously. Which will push the price below five cents. Which means nobody is in profit. Which means nobody files lawsuits. Because there is nothing left to recover. I designed that sequence too. That's vesting. Phase one takes one wallet at a time. Phase two captures 18,000 addresses simultaneously, each of them clicking yes on the identical ballot under the identical terms I wrote, in language simple enough for a compliance officer to approve and opaque enough for a retail buyer to mistake for democracy. Same coercion. Different magnitude. Both listed under governance on the project website. Sun's billion-dollar complaint characterizes the freeze function as "a unilateral deprivation of property rights." The ballot proves otherwise. It was not unilateral. We asked. Ninety-nine point five percent said yes. Under the specific condition that saying no meant keeping nothing. That's consensus.

Peter Girnus 🦅

32,555 views • 3 months ago

GROK 4.1 FAST JUST DID THE IMPOSSIBLE AGAIN: 334 BILLION TOKENS IN A SINGLE DAY The OpenRouter leaderboard isn’t just broken. It’s been nuked from orbit. Yesterday: 253B tokens Today: 334B tokens That’s an 81B token jump in 24 hours. The closest competitor needs almost an entire week to hit what Grok 4.1 Fast does before lunch. This is the free model. The one anyone can use with zero paywall. People aren’t testing Grok anymore. They’ve moved in permanently. The throne isn’t up for grabs. It’s already been welded shut with Grok sitting on it. Bow down. The king just went super Saiyan. Source: X Freeze

GROK 4.1 FAST JUST DID THE IMPOSSIBLE AGAIN: 334 BILLION TOKENS IN A SINGLE DAY The OpenRouter leaderboard isn’t just broken. It’s been nuked from orbit. Yesterday: 253B tokens Today: 334B tokens That’s an 81B token jump in 24 hours. The closest competitor needs almost an entire week to hit what Grok 4.1 Fast does before lunch. This is the free model. The one anyone can use with zero paywall. People aren’t testing Grok anymore. They’ve moved in permanently. The throne isn’t up for grabs. It’s already been welded shut with Grok sitting on it. Bow down. The king just went super Saiyan. Source: X Freeze

Mario Nawfal

42,979 views • 8 months ago

The 5 largest private equity firms reported $48 billion in profit last year, a chunk of that is from single-family home acquisitions “In completely unrelated news, the number of adults over the age of 65 looking to rent with a roommate has tripled in the last decade” Private equity firms are buying up single family homes, skyrocketing home value prices and then renting them back to us - More than 1 million Americans 65+ lived with non-related roommates in 2024. This is up 16% since 2019 - Homeowners 65+ advertising rooms for rent has also risen sharply

The 5 largest private equity firms reported $48 billion in profit last year, a chunk of that is from single-family home acquisitions “In completely unrelated news, the number of adults over the age of 65 looking to rent with a roommate has tripled in the last decade” Private equity firms are buying up single family homes, skyrocketing home value prices and then renting them back to us - More than 1 million Americans 65+ lived with non-related roommates in 2024. This is up 16% since 2019 - Homeowners 65+ advertising rooms for rent has also risen sharply

Wall Street Apes

31,285 views • 3 months ago

Is Michael Saylor about to get a margin call? No. And the reason is more interesting than the rumor, because what he built instead may be harder to escape than one. A margin call needs a lender who can seize collateral when the price drops. Strategy has none. Its $6.7 billion in debt is convertible notes, the largest tranche due in 2029, with no loan-to-value trigger and no clause that lets anyone take a coin because Bitcoin fell. Saylor learned that in 2022, when he did have a collateralized loan and sweated a liquidation price, then rebuilt the structure so it could never happen again. On the literal question he is right, and the people calling for his liquidation this week do not understand what they see. But killing the fast death created a slow one almost nobody is pricing. To fund his buying, Saylor issued a mountain of perpetual preferred stock that pays a fixed dividend forever, near 11.5 percent, no matter where Bitcoin trades. That annual bill quadrupled from about $300 million in January to roughly $1.2 billion now, while the cash reserve that pays it fell 38 percent this year to near $1.4 billion, after the company spent $1.5 billion in May retiring debt. Put those two numbers together and you get the figure that actually matters, and it is not a Bitcoin price. It is a countdown. Dividend coverage, the time the cash can keep paying that bill, has collapsed from more than seven years in early 2026 to between ten and fourteen months, depending on whose math you use. Months, not years. The market is already pricing it, just not where the rumor is looking. That preferred stock is engineered to sit at $100. Last week it cracked to $82.50, a record 17.5 percent below par. That discount is investors quietly clocking the strain while the timeline screams about a margin call that cannot happen. There is a clean way out, and it is the one door the structure was built to keep shut. Restoring a safe two years of coverage takes about $2.8 billion, roughly double what Strategy holds, and the fastest path there is to sell Bitcoin. But selling crystallizes a $10.6 billion loss, breaks the never-sell promise that gives the stock its premium, and bleeds the very asset the machine exists to hoard. The exit and the wound are the same cut. He already brushed it, selling 32 coins on June 1 to cover a payment. Thirty-two against more than 847,000 is a rounding error in size and an earthquake in meaning, because the company that swore it would never sell, sold, to pay a dividend. And there is a second trigger almost no one has read, buried in the fine print. If Saylor ever simply skips a preferred payment to save cash, the missed amount compounds, the senior layer can ratchet its rate higher, a senior miss freezes payments to every junior layer beneath it, and after enough missed quarters those preferred holders can start taking board seats. No one seizes a coin. But control begins migrating to the people he owes. The clock does not just run down. It hands away the keys at the end. So the honest verdict is the one neither side is shouting. There is no margin call and no imminent bankruptcy. The structure protects him exactly as designed. What it cannot protect him from is a fixed bill that grows while the cash shrinks, where every exit deepens the hole. Sell Bitcoin and break the story. Issue stock into a price near its lowest since 2024 and punish your holders. Skip the dividend and start losing the company by the boardroom. Saylor did not escape the margin call. He traded a cliff for a clock. A cliff takes you in an afternoon and a stranger pulls the trigger. This clock takes months, and at the end the trigger is pulled by the only two forces he swore would never touch it, his own hand, or the people he owes. The rumor asks whether someone is about to call his loan. The real question is how many months he can keep paying before he has to sell the dream, dilute the believers, or hand over the board to keep the lights on.

Is Michael Saylor about to get a margin call? No. And the reason is more interesting than the rumor, because what he built instead may be harder to escape than one. A margin call needs a lender who can seize collateral when the price drops. Strategy has none. Its $6.7 billion in debt is convertible notes, the largest tranche due in 2029, with no loan-to-value trigger and no clause that lets anyone take a coin because Bitcoin fell. Saylor learned that in 2022, when he did have a collateralized loan and sweated a liquidation price, then rebuilt the structure so it could never happen again. On the literal question he is right, and the people calling for his liquidation this week do not understand what they see. But killing the fast death created a slow one almost nobody is pricing. To fund his buying, Saylor issued a mountain of perpetual preferred stock that pays a fixed dividend forever, near 11.5 percent, no matter where Bitcoin trades. That annual bill quadrupled from about $300 million in January to roughly $1.2 billion now, while the cash reserve that pays it fell 38 percent this year to near $1.4 billion, after the company spent $1.5 billion in May retiring debt. Put those two numbers together and you get the figure that actually matters, and it is not a Bitcoin price. It is a countdown. Dividend coverage, the time the cash can keep paying that bill, has collapsed from more than seven years in early 2026 to between ten and fourteen months, depending on whose math you use. Months, not years. The market is already pricing it, just not where the rumor is looking. That preferred stock is engineered to sit at $100. Last week it cracked to $82.50, a record 17.5 percent below par. That discount is investors quietly clocking the strain while the timeline screams about a margin call that cannot happen. There is a clean way out, and it is the one door the structure was built to keep shut. Restoring a safe two years of coverage takes about $2.8 billion, roughly double what Strategy holds, and the fastest path there is to sell Bitcoin. But selling crystallizes a $10.6 billion loss, breaks the never-sell promise that gives the stock its premium, and bleeds the very asset the machine exists to hoard. The exit and the wound are the same cut. He already brushed it, selling 32 coins on June 1 to cover a payment. Thirty-two against more than 847,000 is a rounding error in size and an earthquake in meaning, because the company that swore it would never sell, sold, to pay a dividend. And there is a second trigger almost no one has read, buried in the fine print. If Saylor ever simply skips a preferred payment to save cash, the missed amount compounds, the senior layer can ratchet its rate higher, a senior miss freezes payments to every junior layer beneath it, and after enough missed quarters those preferred holders can start taking board seats. No one seizes a coin. But control begins migrating to the people he owes. The clock does not just run down. It hands away the keys at the end. So the honest verdict is the one neither side is shouting. There is no margin call and no imminent bankruptcy. The structure protects him exactly as designed. What it cannot protect him from is a fixed bill that grows while the cash shrinks, where every exit deepens the hole. Sell Bitcoin and break the story. Issue stock into a price near its lowest since 2024 and punish your holders. Skip the dividend and start losing the company by the boardroom. Saylor did not escape the margin call. He traded a cliff for a clock. A cliff takes you in an afternoon and a stranger pulls the trigger. This clock takes months, and at the end the trigger is pulled by the only two forces he swore would never touch it, his own hand, or the people he owes. The rumor asks whether someone is about to call his loan. The real question is how many months he can keep paying before he has to sell the dream, dilute the believers, or hand over the board to keep the lights on.

Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡

58,542 views • 1 month ago

The most extreme strategy on Polymarket earned this guy $135,256 What's the secret? There isn't one. It's simply: -> Buys "Yes"/"No" for 0.1-3¢ each -> Bets on exact temperatures that almost never come true -> Waits -> Repeats this 8,207 times No hedging. No small profits. A pure lottery with the odds in your favor. Locations around the world: Wellington, Tokyo, Chicago, Atlanta, Seoul, Dallas... While everyone else is looking for a steady 5-10%, he’s racking up +48,000% on penny bets. The most dangerous trader is the one who isn't afraid to lose 8,000 times for the sake of that 8,000th win.

The most extreme strategy on Polymarket earned this guy $135,256 What's the secret? There isn't one. It's simply: -> Buys "Yes"/"No" for 0.1-3¢ each -> Bets on exact temperatures that almost never come true -> Waits -> Repeats this 8,207 times No hedging. No small profits. A pure lottery with the odds in your favor. Locations around the world: Wellington, Tokyo, Chicago, Atlanta, Seoul, Dallas... While everyone else is looking for a steady 5-10%, he’s racking up +48,000% on penny bets. The most dangerous trader is the one who isn't afraid to lose 8,000 times for the sake of that 8,000th win.

Dekos

31,552 views • 3 days ago

Warren Buffett is sitting on $373 billion in cash. That is the most bearish macro signal I have ever seen. I don’t need charts. I don’t need indicators. I watch what the greatest investor alive does with his money. And right now he’s telling you everything without saying a single word. - sold 75% of his Apple position - dumped billions in Bank of America - net seller of stocks for 12 straight quarters - retired with the largest cash pile in corporate history - parked it all in US Treasuries while everyone else chased AI - the S&P 500 is down 11% in 2026. - Berkshire is up 12%. His cash position is now worth more than 477 of the 500 companies in the S&P 500. Wall Street called his cash pile a mistake. Now every fund manager in the world wishes they had done the same. Every single time Buffett hoards cash, markets bleed. 2000. 2008. 2020. Now 2026. The pattern never changes because human greed never changes. He waits. They panic. He buys the bottom. They buy the top. This is not panic. The greatest investor of all time is moving in silence.

Warren Buffett is sitting on $373 billion in cash. That is the most bearish macro signal I have ever seen. I don’t need charts. I don’t need indicators. I watch what the greatest investor alive does with his money. And right now he’s telling you everything without saying a single word. - sold 75% of his Apple position - dumped billions in Bank of America - net seller of stocks for 12 straight quarters - retired with the largest cash pile in corporate history - parked it all in US Treasuries while everyone else chased AI - the S&P 500 is down 11% in 2026. - Berkshire is up 12%. His cash position is now worth more than 477 of the 500 companies in the S&P 500. Wall Street called his cash pile a mistake. Now every fund manager in the world wishes they had done the same. Every single time Buffett hoards cash, markets bleed. 2000. 2008. 2020. Now 2026. The pattern never changes because human greed never changes. He waits. They panic. He buys the bottom. They buy the top. This is not panic. The greatest investor of all time is moving in silence.

cape

22,805 views • 3 months ago

A 24-year-old guy made $9,420 trading the S&P in just two weeks, without looking at a chart even once he'd blown up two small accounts first, both times drawing the same support lines and "order blocks" everyone else draws. none of it worked, because none of it moves the market. so he stopped watching the picture and started watching the people forced to hedge: > he tracked Net GEX, the map of where dealers are short gamma and have to hedge > at one strike a wall of negative gamma had piled up, the zone where a dip forces them to sell into it > when price touched it, the market makers sank it themselves, covering their own risk > he was already in cheap same-day (0DTE) puts, and the move ran them +470% in hours he sized tiny every time, because the leverage that paid him could zero the position by lunch. $9,420 didn't come from a secret indicator. they came the day he saw the crowd was staring at drawings while the market was being moved by the math of hedging billion-cap positions.

A 24-year-old guy made $9,420 trading the S&P in just two weeks, without looking at a chart even once he'd blown up two small accounts first, both times drawing the same support lines and "order blocks" everyone else draws. none of it worked, because none of it moves the market. so he stopped watching the picture and started watching the people forced to hedge: > he tracked Net GEX, the map of where dealers are short gamma and have to hedge > at one strike a wall of negative gamma had piled up, the zone where a dip forces them to sell into it > when price touched it, the market makers sank it themselves, covering their own risk > he was already in cheap same-day (0DTE) puts, and the move ran them +470% in hours he sized tiny every time, because the leverage that paid him could zero the position by lunch. $9,420 didn't come from a secret indicator. they came the day he saw the crowd was staring at drawings while the market was being moved by the math of hedging billion-cap positions.

Ridark

24,199 views • 19 days ago

JUST IN: Bank of America just told its clients to take profits. About 70% of its bear-market signals are flashing, a level it typically reaches only near market tops. Weeks earlier, BofA's own fund manager survey showed the largest one-month jump into stocks ever recorded, with cash down to 3.9%, under the 4% line the bank treats as a sell signal. Read those together. Investors made their biggest dash into equities in the survey's history at almost the exact moment BofA's own indicators say the top is near. But the number that should actually stop you is buried in the note, and almost nobody is quoting it. The companies driving this entire rally, the AI hyperscalers, are on track to spend nearly 100% of their operating cash flow on capex by year-end. In 2023 that figure was 40%. Sit with that. Big tech used to throw off cash and hand it back through buybacks, which lifted the stocks. Now it is pouring almost every dollar it generates into chips and data centers. BofA notes buybacks have slowed and cash conversion has flat-lined. The engine of the rally is consuming the fuel that powered the stocks. It is the same $725 billion build that companies are now blaming for layoffs. The whole market is priced on one bet, and that bet has grown large enough to eat the cash that used to support the share prices. This is not a crash call. BofA's year-end target is 7,100, about 4% below today, and the median outcome after this cash signal since 2011 has been a 1% dip, not a collapse. The posts screaming sell everything are wrong. The real message is quieter. You are being paid less and less to stay, while the engine runs hotter and hotter.

JUST IN: Bank of America just told its clients to take profits. About 70% of its bear-market signals are flashing, a level it typically reaches only near market tops. Weeks earlier, BofA's own fund manager survey showed the largest one-month jump into stocks ever recorded, with cash down to 3.9%, under the 4% line the bank treats as a sell signal. Read those together. Investors made their biggest dash into equities in the survey's history at almost the exact moment BofA's own indicators say the top is near. But the number that should actually stop you is buried in the note, and almost nobody is quoting it. The companies driving this entire rally, the AI hyperscalers, are on track to spend nearly 100% of their operating cash flow on capex by year-end. In 2023 that figure was 40%. Sit with that. Big tech used to throw off cash and hand it back through buybacks, which lifted the stocks. Now it is pouring almost every dollar it generates into chips and data centers. BofA notes buybacks have slowed and cash conversion has flat-lined. The engine of the rally is consuming the fuel that powered the stocks. It is the same $725 billion build that companies are now blaming for layoffs. The whole market is priced on one bet, and that bet has grown large enough to eat the cash that used to support the share prices. This is not a crash call. BofA's year-end target is 7,100, about 4% below today, and the median outcome after this cash signal since 2011 has been a 1% dip, not a collapse. The posts screaming sell everything are wrong. The real message is quieter. You are being paid less and less to stay, while the engine runs hotter and hotter.

Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡

17,235 views • 1 month ago

Despite the UFC’s financial success, ZERO MMA fighters made Sportico’s 2024 Top 100 Highest-Paid Athletes list, while six boxers did: 3: Tyson Fury - $147M 7: Oleksandr Usyk - $122M 20: Canelo Alvarez - $73M 30: Anthony Joshua - $60M 52: Jake Paul - $48M 81: Naoya Inoue $42M (All fought twice in 2024, except Jake Paul, who fought three times.) Every UFC post-fight press conference begins with Dana White boasting about broken gate record, arena records, and others. Dana often compares the UFC to the NFL, NBA, and soccer, and they certainly have grown exponentially, but this is where the UFC truly differs. So, how is Alex Pereira not on the list after his massively impressive 2024? As one of the UFC’s biggest stars, Light Heavyweight Champion Pereira fought three times in 2024, including short-notice fights, saving and headlining some of the year’s biggest events, like UFC 300—yet he didn’t make the list. Meanwhile, NFL quarterback Daniel Jones landed the 100th spot, earning $37.5 million in salary and endorsements. It’s not breaking news that UFC/MMA fighters don’t earn as well as athletes in other sports, but it’s always interesting to see these annual lists considering the UFC had yet another record-breaking year financially in 2024. UFC 306 at The Sphere alone set multiple records, including the highest gate in UFC history at $21,829,245, surpassing UFC 205. Next week, TKO Group will release its full 2024 financial results, but in August 2024 they had raised their revenue forecast to $2.745 billion up from the previous estimate of $2.685 billion, with an expected EBITDA of $1.22 billion - $1.24 billion. The UFC is exceeding revenue expectations, reinforcing their financial and market dominance which definitely benefits TKO’s investors and stakeholders, but does it truly trickle down to the fighters? It’s a pivotal time for the UFC and the fighters as the UFC is in line for a new broadcast deal that will likely be worth over $1 billion per year. Ariel Helwani and his team were asked about the 2024 Top 100 Highest-Paid Athletes list and it is definitely worth a listen. Full top 100:

Despite the UFC’s financial success, ZERO MMA fighters made Sportico’s 2024 Top 100 Highest-Paid Athletes list, while six boxers did: 3: Tyson Fury - $147M 7: Oleksandr Usyk - $122M 20: Canelo Alvarez - $73M 30: Anthony Joshua - $60M 52: Jake Paul - $48M 81: Naoya Inoue $42M (All fought twice in 2024, except Jake Paul, who fought three times.) Every UFC post-fight press conference begins with Dana White boasting about broken gate record, arena records, and others. Dana often compares the UFC to the NFL, NBA, and soccer, and they certainly have grown exponentially, but this is where the UFC truly differs. So, how is Alex Pereira not on the list after his massively impressive 2024? As one of the UFC’s biggest stars, Light Heavyweight Champion Pereira fought three times in 2024, including short-notice fights, saving and headlining some of the year’s biggest events, like UFC 300—yet he didn’t make the list. Meanwhile, NFL quarterback Daniel Jones landed the 100th spot, earning $37.5 million in salary and endorsements. It’s not breaking news that UFC/MMA fighters don’t earn as well as athletes in other sports, but it’s always interesting to see these annual lists considering the UFC had yet another record-breaking year financially in 2024. UFC 306 at The Sphere alone set multiple records, including the highest gate in UFC history at $21,829,245, surpassing UFC 205. Next week, TKO Group will release its full 2024 financial results, but in August 2024 they had raised their revenue forecast to $2.745 billion up from the previous estimate of $2.685 billion, with an expected EBITDA of $1.22 billion - $1.24 billion. The UFC is exceeding revenue expectations, reinforcing their financial and market dominance which definitely benefits TKO’s investors and stakeholders, but does it truly trickle down to the fighters? It’s a pivotal time for the UFC and the fighters as the UFC is in line for a new broadcast deal that will likely be worth over $1 billion per year. Ariel Helwani and his team were asked about the 2024 Top 100 Highest-Paid Athletes list and it is definitely worth a listen. Full top 100:

AFeldmanMMA

56,827 views • 1 year ago