Tesseract - 4 dimension cube #tesseract

Eternally fascinating

Good to know I'm not the sole enjoyer of 4-dimensional geometry Looks amazing!

Appreciate it, glad you liked it 🙏

the whole idea of 4 dimension is based on 90' correlation of X Y Z so i dont know what this is but this is not 4 dimensions representation is a MOVE props.

Appreciate the feedback 🙏 it’s more of a visual exploration than a strict 4D model

its just the 3d "shadow" of a 4d cube rotating.

Yeah, something along those lines , glad it reads that way 😄

Just now, I’m feeling like this is more like a low-resolution, chunky, bouncing, torus with a singular spin than a four dimensional “cube”. A torus is the shape of a donut. Ooo…you know those squiggly sack things that you’d squeeze and they would “slip” out of your hands? That.

Interesting take 😄 it’s actually a 3D procedural build in C4D

Cool man. It’s also giving me the vibes of how water splashes when you drop a stone into a pond/puddle.

Not really, it's a scam because if you look at the film, there's the inevitable X x Y height x width pictorial acreage of it, subject to perspective geometry, you're just watching the birdie.

Sure, but the illusion is the whole point 😉

The illusion is poor and a political masquerade of the fact that all visual media is subject to perspective geometry thus facilitating architectonic illusions (3D) in pictorial space (not 4 D) and the reason is because it proves Agnosticism to be the eternal reach of any entity.

I’m just here making cool visuals.

I'm Mr. Bickle, Travis... 😎 It's still good. I've been thinking about my CAD poor night class attendance and failure... But the reason I am interested is the question of how do you articulate the '4th Dimension' in art, this is the real CAD challenge:

Appreciate the insight 🙏 in this series I’m more focused on representing concepts than strict dimensional models

That's not a 4-dimensional objects. It's strictly in 3-d.