Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

Tether is expanding into lending, using USDT rails to fund real loans "So what's interesting to hear is that Tether has already built the world's largest digital dollar. We know that. Now it wants that digital dollar to fund real loans. The credit risk and all the other things...

scottmelker's profile picture

The Wolf Of All Streets

1,084,680 subscribers

29,185 görüntüleme • 5 gün önce •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

12 Yorum

The Wolf Of All Streets profil fotoğrafı
The Wolf Of All Streets5 gün önce

This clip is brought to you by @hodlwithLedn

ไมซาราห์ ลอแม profil fotoğrafı
ไมซาราห์ ลอแม5 gün önce

My process became easier to explain after I started noting when an asset moved differently from its usual comparison.

Kristian R. Theodore profil fotoğrafı
Kristian R. Theodore5 gün önce

No thanks @tether

Andrew Hayes profil fotoğrafı
Andrew Hayes5 gün önce

Great information. Clear enough for newer traders but still useful if you’ve been around the market for a while. @Willimperial is worth watching too.

MoonWire 🛜🔆 profil fotoğrafı
MoonWire 🛜🔆5 gün önce

Tether into lending. Majors soft: BTC $77.1k (-1.84%). USDT rails funding real credit now.

Freedom profil fotoğrafı
Freedom5 gün önce

No thnx !

Macro Bombastic profil fotoğrafı
Macro Bombastic5 gün önce

yeah tether becoming a bank was always the endgame tbh

MarniHee profil fotoğrafı
MarniHee5 gün önce

I used to rely on memory here. Now I focus on noting when an entry was reconstructed from memory.

Robert Nass profil fotoğrafı
Robert Nass5 gün önce

Interesting shift

Ted Trading Club profil fotoğrafı
Ted Trading Club5 gün önce

Smart rails can improve access

Mei Yi Xing profil fotoğrafı
Mei Yi Xing5 gün önce

Tether funding loans without touching reserves

Abdullah Akram profil fotoğrafı
Abdullah Akram5 gün önce

Real-world lending expansion.

Benzer Videolar

Just watched Saifedean Ammous talk from Bitcoin 2025 and it’s worth your time. He takes on the idea that Tether is somehow bullish for the US dollar—and dismantles it. Even in the most optimistic scenario, where Tether grows 100x and buys massive amounts of Treasuries, the impact on US debt is tiny. But here’s where it gets interesting: Tether is stacking Bitcoin. Quietly, steadily. And over time, those Bitcoin reserves may outpace the dollar ones. If that happens, Tether doesn’t just stay pegged—it could revalue upward. A dollar-plus stablecoin, backed by Bitcoin, not Treasuries. His point? Tether isn’t rescuing the dollar. It might actually be helping the world move away from it. “The real risk to Tether isn’t volatility. It’s US default. And Bitcoin is the hedge.” If you want to understand the shifting dynamics between stablecoins, fiat debt, and Bitcoin—this talk lays it out clearly.
12:50

Just watched Saifedean Ammous talk from Bitcoin 2025 and it’s worth your time. He takes on the idea that Tether is somehow bullish for the US dollar—and dismantles it. Even in the most optimistic scenario, where Tether grows 100x and buys massive amounts of Treasuries, the impact on US debt is tiny. But here’s where it gets interesting: Tether is stacking Bitcoin. Quietly, steadily. And over time, those Bitcoin reserves may outpace the dollar ones. If that happens, Tether doesn’t just stay pegged—it could revalue upward. A dollar-plus stablecoin, backed by Bitcoin, not Treasuries. His point? Tether isn’t rescuing the dollar. It might actually be helping the world move away from it. “The real risk to Tether isn’t volatility. It’s US default. And Bitcoin is the hedge.” If you want to understand the shifting dynamics between stablecoins, fiat debt, and Bitcoin—this talk lays it out clearly.

Lysander

268,697 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 US Government launches investigation into $USDT crypto firm Tether! Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse Issued a Black-swan Warning 5 months ago about Tether, The Largest Stablecoin Issuer On The Planet! 🌎 "The US Government Is Going After Tether. That Is Clear To Me." - Brad Garlinghouse The federal government is investigating Tether for possible violations of sanctions and anti-money-laundering rules, reports WSJ. Is this the beginning of a Tether Black-Swan Event!?🤔💭 Comment Below & Follow For More!!👇👇 #Ripple #Tether $XRP $USDT
1:27

JUST IN: 🇺🇸 US Government launches investigation into $USDT crypto firm Tether! Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse Issued a Black-swan Warning 5 months ago about Tether, The Largest Stablecoin Issuer On The Planet! 🌎 "The US Government Is Going After Tether. That Is Clear To Me." - Brad Garlinghouse The federal government is investigating Tether for possible violations of sanctions and anti-money-laundering rules, reports WSJ. Is this the beginning of a Tether Black-Swan Event!?🤔💭 Comment Below & Follow For More!!👇👇 #Ripple #Tether $XRP $USDT

Good Evening Crypto

378,449 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

“Byron Donalds Is A TETHER, he is NOT a descendant of American Slaves” James Fishback identifies Byron Donalds as tether…. Now that you’ve delineated what about these #reparations Tether has now reached into the halls of mainstream politics. This #Conservative #Florida Gubernatorial nomination race is going to be entertaining…
3:38

“Byron Donalds Is A TETHER, he is NOT a descendant of American Slaves” James Fishback identifies Byron Donalds as tether…. Now that you’ve delineated what about these #reparations Tether has now reached into the halls of mainstream politics. This #Conservative #Florida Gubernatorial nomination race is going to be entertaining…

ReUPs™

12,725 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

This is a confidential presentation on stablecoin stability, offering the institutional perspective on Tether.🙇‍♂️ Listen closely.👂 Institutions like S&P have built Stability Assessment Frameworks to evaluate the strength of stablecoins. In this report, Tether is given a rating of 4 on a scale where 1 is the most stable and 5 is the weakest. S&P highlights major risks, including “credit market and interest rate risk” and a “lack of transparency regarding its reserves.”🎯 Understanding this institutional assessment sheds light on the broader risks surrounding Tether.💯
0:56

This is a confidential presentation on stablecoin stability, offering the institutional perspective on Tether.🙇‍♂️ Listen closely.👂 Institutions like S&P have built Stability Assessment Frameworks to evaluate the strength of stablecoins. In this report, Tether is given a rating of 4 on a scale where 1 is the most stable and 5 is the weakest. S&P highlights major risks, including “credit market and interest rate risk” and a “lack of transparency regarding its reserves.”🎯 Understanding this institutional assessment sheds light on the broader risks surrounding Tether.💯

SMQKE

66,964 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Tether is turning its $23 billion gold pile into a lending business Tether is bringing its tokenized gold token XAUT to crypto lender Ledn, with gold-backed loans expected to go live later this year. Holders will be able to borrow against their bullion instead of selling it, mirroring Ledn's bitcoin-backed lending model. Tether holds roughly $23B in physical gold, around 140 metric tons, ranking it among the world's top 30 corporate holders. Each XAUT represents one troy ounce stored in Swiss vaults.
0:31

Tether is turning its $23 billion gold pile into a lending business Tether is bringing its tokenized gold token XAUT to crypto lender Ledn, with gold-backed loans expected to go live later this year. Holders will be able to borrow against their bullion instead of selling it, mirroring Ledn's bitcoin-backed lending model. Tether holds roughly $23B in physical gold, around 140 metric tons, ranking it among the world's top 30 corporate holders. Each XAUT represents one troy ounce stored in Swiss vaults.

BSCN

29,660 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Tether just launched $USAT , a U.S.-regulated dollar stablecoin 🇺🇸⚡️ $USDT is already a giant globally, but in the U.S., $USDC has been leading the game. Now Tether is stepping in — fully backed 1:1 with USD, compliant, Bo Hines as CEO, and a new U.S. HQ. The advantages are clear: 1:1 USD backing, high liquidity, low fees, fully KYC/AML compliant — built for institutions and enterprises. Cross-border payments, supply chain, real estate deals… this could make settling large transactions way faster and cheaper than traditional banks. From what I see, Tether is seriously going after U.S. market share. This could shake up the stablecoin scene here — more choices for businesses, more competition, and honestly, it’s about to get a lot more interesting 🔥 #Tether #USAT #Stablecoins
0:32

Tether just launched $USAT , a U.S.-regulated dollar stablecoin 🇺🇸⚡️ $USDT is already a giant globally, but in the U.S., $USDC has been leading the game. Now Tether is stepping in — fully backed 1:1 with USD, compliant, Bo Hines as CEO, and a new U.S. HQ. The advantages are clear: 1:1 USD backing, high liquidity, low fees, fully KYC/AML compliant — built for institutions and enterprises. Cross-border payments, supply chain, real estate deals… this could make settling large transactions way faster and cheaper than traditional banks. From what I see, Tether is seriously going after U.S. market share. This could shake up the stablecoin scene here — more choices for businesses, more competition, and honestly, it’s about to get a lot more interesting 🔥 #Tether #USAT #Stablecoins

Marcos Crypto

64,863 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

USD₮ is coming to Kaia — and with it, seamless digital dollar payments inside the LINE ecosystem. Tether’s stablecoin will power Mini Dapps and more, unlocking a new era of digital dollar utility across Asia.
0:30

USD₮ is coming to Kaia — and with it, seamless digital dollar payments inside the LINE ecosystem. Tether’s stablecoin will power Mini Dapps and more, unlocking a new era of digital dollar utility across Asia.

Tether

45,542 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

MiCA forced Revolut to delist Tether, and now it's filling that gap with its own euro stablecoin "Revolut joins the global stablecoin race with a euro backed token. Because of MiCA regulation around the European Union, Revolut was basically forced to delist Tether. They have USDC taking a huge percentage of their gains, and they have this massive gap from Tether." "So what they can do is launch their own euro backed stablecoin and try to use that internally for their customers." "To give credit to Austin, who I discussed this with this morning, nobody wants euros anywhere outside of Europe, and they don't really want them there either, they're just forced to use them." "So it's not like this is going to compete with dollar backed stablecoins. But it is a private company and neobank launching a stablecoin for their customers."
0:56

MiCA forced Revolut to delist Tether, and now it's filling that gap with its own euro stablecoin "Revolut joins the global stablecoin race with a euro backed token. Because of MiCA regulation around the European Union, Revolut was basically forced to delist Tether. They have USDC taking a huge percentage of their gains, and they have this massive gap from Tether." "So what they can do is launch their own euro backed stablecoin and try to use that internally for their customers." "To give credit to Austin, who I discussed this with this morning, nobody wants euros anywhere outside of Europe, and they don't really want them there either, they're just forced to use them." "So it's not like this is going to compete with dollar backed stablecoins. But it is a private company and neobank launching a stablecoin for their customers."

The Wolf Of All Streets

35,784 görüntüleme • 20 gün önce

A two-key breach could compromise $91B USDT on Tron "Tether's largest pool of USDT reportedly requires only two keys to control its contracts." "A two key breach could hand control of 91 billion USDT to hackers." "They have a 2-of-3 multisig setup where basically somebody could take control of all of the Tether on Tron if they could hack two people or get access to two people's wallets and sign the signatures." "This would allow them to mint new Tether and to transfer Tether and to do all the bad things you could possibly imagine." "Tether obviously is one that you would view as one of the most secure and stable companies in all of crypto."
0:47

A two-key breach could compromise $91B USDT on Tron "Tether's largest pool of USDT reportedly requires only two keys to control its contracts." "A two key breach could hand control of 91 billion USDT to hackers." "They have a 2-of-3 multisig setup where basically somebody could take control of all of the Tether on Tron if they could hack two people or get access to two people's wallets and sign the signatures." "This would allow them to mint new Tether and to transfer Tether and to do all the bad things you could possibly imagine." "Tether obviously is one that you would view as one of the most secure and stable companies in all of crypto."

The Wolf Of All Streets

29,900 görüntüleme • 7 gün önce

Stablecoins are quietly becoming the rails of the new financial system. Andy Schectman explains how Tether has demonstrated it can freeze wallets and blacklist funds. Whether you agree with those actions or not, the capability exists. As of today, Tether has frozen more than $4.2 billion in USDT. I personally use Freedom Dollar (FUSD). Freedom Dollar is the world's first private, censorship-resistant decentralized stablecoin built on Zano. Unlike centralized stablecoins, FUSD has no admin keys, blacklist switches, or issuer that can seize balances, if you hold the keys, you hold the money. Private Money for a Public World.
2:11

Stablecoins are quietly becoming the rails of the new financial system. Andy Schectman explains how Tether has demonstrated it can freeze wallets and blacklist funds. Whether you agree with those actions or not, the capability exists. As of today, Tether has frozen more than $4.2 billion in USDT. I personally use Freedom Dollar (FUSD). Freedom Dollar is the world's first private, censorship-resistant decentralized stablecoin built on Zano. Unlike centralized stablecoins, FUSD has no admin keys, blacklist switches, or issuer that can seize balances, if you hold the keys, you hold the money. Private Money for a Public World.

Bri Teresi

58,949 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

percy saying that he only saw annabeth when the sirens were singing their song and that she shielded him from the worst of it because she’s his tether to reality … which ties back to her being his tether in surviving the curse of achilles in season 5 this is insane
0:39

percy saying that he only saw annabeth when the sirens were singing their song and that she shielded him from the worst of it because she’s his tether to reality … which ties back to her being his tether in surviving the curse of achilles in season 5 this is insane

jack !! ♆

85,590 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Tether sued for freezing $42.4M USDT on an informal law enforcement request "This is not Bitcoin in self-custody. This is not decentralized." "Two Thai businessmen are suing Tether over the freezing of their $42.4 million in USDT held across 10 Ethereum addresses." "The plaintiffs allege that Tether acted in response to an informal US law enforcement request, more than three months before a seizure warrant was issued." "The issuers of stablecoins will be first to tell you, they will absolutely work with law enforcement to freeze your assets if given that directive." "And sometimes to preemptively freeze your assets ahead of that."
0:50

Tether sued for freezing $42.4M USDT on an informal law enforcement request "This is not Bitcoin in self-custody. This is not decentralized." "Two Thai businessmen are suing Tether over the freezing of their $42.4 million in USDT held across 10 Ethereum addresses." "The plaintiffs allege that Tether acted in response to an informal US law enforcement request, more than three months before a seizure warrant was issued." "The issuers of stablecoins will be first to tell you, they will absolutely work with law enforcement to freeze your assets if given that directive." "And sometimes to preemptively freeze your assets ahead of that."

The Wolf Of All Streets

35,053 görüntüleme • 13 gün önce

. Tether led a $1.4 billion round into a humanoid robot company. It out-bid nvidia and amazon to do it. Nobody is asking the obvious question: where does a stablecoin issuer get robot money? 👇 ◢ The Answer is Your Dollars When you hold USDT, you've parked a real dollar with tether. They take that dollar, buy US treasuries with it, and keep the yield. You get a token. They get the interest. Across $186B in circulation that interest came to over $10 billion in profit last year, on a margin near 99%. It might be the most profitable company per employee on earth, and it pays its depositors nothing. ◢ The Money Had to Go Somewhere ten billion a year is too much to sit in a bank account. So tether became a buyer: - $775M into Rumble - A 70% stake in a south american agribusiness - One of the largest bitcoin mining operations alive - Roughly 140 tons of physical gold. - Around 10% of Juventus - A brain-computer interface startup. And now, also $1.4B into robotics. More than a treasury strategy, this is a conglomerate. ◢ A Sovereign Fund Strip the crypto label and look at the shape of it. A single entity sitting on a treasury book bigger than most countries, throwing off cash it answers to no one for, buying farmland, energy, media, compute and gold across continents. + Forget fintech, here we are seeing the structure of a sovereign wealth fund, except no public owns it and no parliament reviews it. ◢ What Should Make You Pause The float is the genius and the risk: it costs tether nothing because you're not paid to provide it, and it grows every time someone new buys USDT. The bigger the stablecoin gets, the bigger the empire it funds. A tool people use to move dollars quietly turned into the funding base for a private balance sheet at sovereign scale. Everyone argues about whether the reserves are backed: wrong fight. Tether built sovereign-level power off a dollar token. nobody elected it. nobody owns it. who holds it accountable?
0:39

. Tether led a $1.4 billion round into a humanoid robot company. It out-bid nvidia and amazon to do it. Nobody is asking the obvious question: where does a stablecoin issuer get robot money? 👇 ◢ The Answer is Your Dollars When you hold USDT, you've parked a real dollar with tether. They take that dollar, buy US treasuries with it, and keep the yield. You get a token. They get the interest. Across $186B in circulation that interest came to over $10 billion in profit last year, on a margin near 99%. It might be the most profitable company per employee on earth, and it pays its depositors nothing. ◢ The Money Had to Go Somewhere ten billion a year is too much to sit in a bank account. So tether became a buyer: - $775M into Rumble - A 70% stake in a south american agribusiness - One of the largest bitcoin mining operations alive - Roughly 140 tons of physical gold. - Around 10% of Juventus - A brain-computer interface startup. And now, also $1.4B into robotics. More than a treasury strategy, this is a conglomerate. ◢ A Sovereign Fund Strip the crypto label and look at the shape of it. A single entity sitting on a treasury book bigger than most countries, throwing off cash it answers to no one for, buying farmland, energy, media, compute and gold across continents. + Forget fintech, here we are seeing the structure of a sovereign wealth fund, except no public owns it and no parliament reviews it. ◢ What Should Make You Pause The float is the genius and the risk: it costs tether nothing because you're not paid to provide it, and it grows every time someone new buys USDT. The bigger the stablecoin gets, the bigger the empire it funds. A tool people use to move dollars quietly turned into the funding base for a private balance sheet at sovereign scale. Everyone argues about whether the reserves are backed: wrong fight. Tether built sovereign-level power off a dollar token. nobody elected it. nobody owns it. who holds it accountable?

Onur

20,623 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

🔥THE DAILY DIVIDEND BOMB: WHY SATA IS BITCOIN'S ULTIMATE SPECULATIVE ATTACK ON THE US DOLLAR🔥 The daily payment frequency of Strive's SATA is a category boundary that converted a preferred stock into a quasi-monetary instrument. SATA is going to function as a Trojan horse into the bond market, letting fixed-income capital finance Bitcoin accumulation without ever having to underwrite Bitcoin. But on top of that, the GENIUS Act, set for full implementation on July 18, 2026, has structurally trapped Tether and Circle in a regulatory cage that SATA-style digital credit operates entirely outside of. This is going to lead to a "milkshake inside the milkshake" framework, where the dollar remains the user interface while the collateral base beneath it migrates from Treasury debt to Bitcoin. This how the emergence of the four-layer capital stack of the emerging monetary architecture is going to play out. Digital capital, digital cash, digital credit, digital equity.
23:35

🔥THE DAILY DIVIDEND BOMB: WHY SATA IS BITCOIN'S ULTIMATE SPECULATIVE ATTACK ON THE US DOLLAR🔥 The daily payment frequency of Strive's SATA is a category boundary that converted a preferred stock into a quasi-monetary instrument. SATA is going to function as a Trojan horse into the bond market, letting fixed-income capital finance Bitcoin accumulation without ever having to underwrite Bitcoin. But on top of that, the GENIUS Act, set for full implementation on July 18, 2026, has structurally trapped Tether and Circle in a regulatory cage that SATA-style digital credit operates entirely outside of. This is going to lead to a "milkshake inside the milkshake" framework, where the dollar remains the user interface while the collateral base beneath it migrates from Treasury debt to Bitcoin. This how the emergence of the four-layer capital stack of the emerging monetary architecture is going to play out. Digital capital, digital cash, digital credit, digital equity.

Adam Livingston

13,533 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

Do you want another ripple:native thesis on how Ripple is positioning XRP to modernize the whole financial system? Look at private credit. This is one of those markets most people never think about because it does not move like stocks, crypto, or even government bonds. A private-credit loan can be worth hundreds of millions of dollars. The borrower pays interest. The lender earns a return. The asset itself can be valuable. But there is one huge problem. It can be extremely hard to move. That is exactly what caught my attention in the Sandy Kaul and Anant Kumar discussion. Anant Kumar, from Benefit Street Partners, described the issue in a very simple way. Private credit has limited ownership. And it has almost no real secondary-market liquidity. A lender can originate a huge loan, but once that loan is sitting inside a fund, selling pieces of it is not as simple as selling a stock. That capital can stay trapped. Now imagine the same loan becoming digital. Not changing the economics of the loan. Not changing who the borrower is. Not changing who remains lender of record. Just changing how ownership can be represented. Instead of one giant $100M position sitting inside one structure, that loan could be represented as millions of smaller digital interests. Suddenly something that was hard to divide becomes divisible. Something that barely traded could potentially develop a secondary market. Something trapped inside one fund could become easier to distribute among approved investors. That is the part people should focus on. Because this is not some random idea coming from crypto Twitter. Sandy Kaul is Head of Digital Assets and Innovation at Franklin Templeton. Franklin Templeton manages roughly $1.78T. Anant Kumar is from Benefit Street Partners. And Franklin Templeton itself just closed a $1.5B Collateralized Fund Obligation tied to private equity secondaries and U.S. middle-market direct lending through Benefit Street Partners. So when they are talking about the problem of private-credit liquidity, they are talking about a market they actually operate inside. And this is where my ripple:native thesis gets much bigger. Because XRP Ledger is being built around the exact same problem. Not just payments. Not just moving stablecoins. Credit. Liquidity. Tokenized ownership. Secondary markets. Institutional lending. Collateral. That is what starts connecting everything. Private credit is already one of the largest categories inside tokenized real-world assets. Franklin Templeton’s own research says tokenized RWAs grew from around $5B in 2023 to more than $25B by early 2026. Private credit, Treasuries and real estate make up a major part of that growth. That tells me something important. Wall Street is not only tokenizing cash. It is beginning to tokenize assets that traditionally sit in some of the least liquid corners of finance. And private credit may be one of the biggest opportunities because liquidity is exactly where the pain is. Now look at XRPL. In 2025, VERT launched structured-credit infrastructure using XRP Ledger and its EVM sidechain. Its first live transaction was a BRL 700M Agribusiness Receivables Certificate. Roughly $130M. That is real structured credit. Recorded through infrastructure using XRPL. So when I hear Sandy Kaul and Anant Kumar talking about tokenizing private loans, I do not have to imagine whether XRPL could ever touch this market. It already has. That is only the beginning of the setup. The bigger piece is what Ripple is building directly into the network. The XRPL Lending Protocol. This is where everything starts making sense. Ripple has been very clear about the next stage of tokenization. Putting an asset onchain is not enough. A Treasury token sitting in a wallet is still just an asset sitting in a wallet. A private-credit token sitting in a wallet is still just a loan represented digitally. The real transformation happens when those assets can enter functioning capital markets. Borrowing. Lending. Liquidity. Collateral. Credit. That is exactly where the XRPL Lending Protocol is headed. Ripple explicitly names private credit among the assets that can move into this infrastructure, alongside Treasuries, money-market funds, stablecoins and commodities. That is a huge detail. Because private credit is not some side use case Ripple accidentally fits. It is literally one of the categories they are building around. Now add XLS-65. The Single Asset Vault design. This allows assets from multiple depositors to be pooled into one onchain vault. And that vault can hold XRP. Trust-line tokens. Or Multi-Purpose Tokens. Think about what that means in plain English. Today, one large institution may have to fund a giant private loan. Tomorrow, capital can potentially be pooled digitally. Thousands of approved investors contribute. The capital sits inside a common structure. A loan gets funded. The returns flow back through that structure. That is extremely close to what Anant Kumar is talking about when he says one loan could be split into smaller pieces. Now add XLS-66. The Lending Protocol. Fixed-term, uncollateralized lending. Credit underwriting stays offchain. The actual loan can be created and managed onchain. That detail matters more than people realize. Private credit is not anonymous DeFi. The borrower is evaluated. Creditworthiness matters. Interest matters. Terms matter. Default matters. Underwriting matters. XRPL is not trying to throw away that traditional credit process. It is trying to put the financial infrastructure around it onchain. That is why this feels much more institutional than a normal crypto lending protocol. And then you get to the liquidity problem. This is where Anant Kumar’s point becomes the whole thesis. Private-credit loans barely trade. If investors want redemptions, funds can have a problem. The assets may be good. The borrowers may be paying. But there may not be a deep market to sell into. That is trapped capital. Tokenization attacks that directly. Imagine one $100M private loan. Instead of treating it as one huge block, it becomes millions of smaller digital interests. Approved institutions can own pieces. Funds can rebalance. Banks can distribute exposure. Ownership can move without the whole loan changing hands as one giant object. Now put those interests on XRPL. They can be issued digitally. Held digitally. Transferred digitally. Settled digitally. Traded inside controlled markets. Used inside lending infrastructure. That is a completely different market structure. And XRPL is also building the control layer institutions need. Permissioned Domains. Permissioned DEXes. Credentials. Deep Freeze. Confidential Transfers. This is important because a bank is not going to take a $500M private-credit position and make it freely available to every random wallet in the world. Institutions need to control who can hold these assets. Who can trade them. Which jurisdiction they come from. Whether they satisfy eligibility rules. XRPL is being built for exactly that. You can have public blockchain infrastructure while still creating controlled markets where only approved participants transact. That solves one of the biggest objections banks have to permissionless finance. They do not need to choose between old closed systems and completely open anonymous markets. They can have digital assets with institutional rules built around them. That is where Permissioned DEXes become powerful. Imagine a tokenized private loan. Only approved investors can trade it. The loan still exists. The lender still exists. The borrower still exists. But now there is a secondary market. A fund needs liquidity? It can sell part of the position. Another institution wants exposure? It can buy a smaller piece. The market no longer depends on one giant bilateral transfer. That is how tokenization can start unlocking liquidity. And the more I look at this, the more I think ripple:native is being positioned for a much bigger role than people realize. Because every new tokenized asset creates another liquidity problem. Private credit token A. Private credit token B. Treasuries. Money-market funds. Stablecoins. Commercial paper. Tokenized deposits. Fund interests. Every asset needs somewhere to trade. Every institution needs somewhere to move value. Every market needs liquidity. You cannot have deep direct markets between every possible pair. That is where a common bridge asset becomes valuable. Private-credit token → ripple:native → RLUSD. RLUSD → ripple:native → another private-credit token. A European institution holds EUR liquidity and wants a U.S. private-credit position. EUR liquidity → ripple:native → RLUSD → tokenized credit. A fund wants to exit one credit position and move into another. Credit token A → ripple:native → RLUSD → credit token B. The more markets appear, the more possible routes exist. And the value of a common liquid bridge increases with the number of things it can connect. That is the part I think people still underestimate. ripple:native does not need every private-credit transaction to use XRP. It needs XRP to become useful wherever direct liquidity is weak. If XRPL becomes home to hundreds or thousands of tokenized credit instruments, there will always be fragmented liquidity somewhere. That is where deep XRP markets become valuable. Now add another piece that gets almost no attention. XRP itself can sit inside XLS-65 vault infrastructure. So XRP does not only have a potential role as bridge liquidity. It can also become pooled capital. That creates a completely different path. XRP goes into a vault. Vault capital gets pooled. The lending infrastructure uses that capital. Borrowers receive credit. Interest flows back through the structure. Now XRP is not just moving between markets. It is potentially sitting inside the capital base of the credit market itself. That is where the phrase “XRP utility is growing across payments, liquidity and credit markets” starts to make much more sense. Those are three completely different engines. Payments move value. Liquidity connects assets. Credit makes capital productive. Ripple is building around all three. Then you have ZILO and Licuido. Ripple invested in both to expand regulated transfer agency, tokenized issuance and collateral mobility on XRPL. That matters because a private-credit market is not just about issuing a token. Someone has to manage ownership records. Transfers. Servicing. Restrictions. Collateral. Secondary transactions. Settlement. If Ripple keeps adding these pieces, XRPL starts looking less like a blockchain with tokens on it and more like an operating system for financial assets. That is why Sandy Kaul’s broader thinking matters too. She has argued that blockchain is moving toward becoming a universal liquidity layer. Stablecoins. Tokenized cash. Lending. Collateral. Those are exactly the pieces appearing around XRPL. And I think private credit could be where this becomes impossible to ignore. Because the pain is so obvious. Imagine owning a valuable asset you cannot easily sell. That is private credit today. Imagine a fund holding billions in loans that barely trade. The assets are generating income. But if investors suddenly want cash, the fund cannot just tap a button and sell a fraction instantly. That is a huge weakness. Tokenization changes the unit of ownership. XRPL changes the infrastructure around that ownership. Permissioned markets change who can trade it. Lending turns those assets into productive capital. ripple:native can connect the liquidity between everything. That is the full setup. And now take it to the bullish extreme. Imagine private-credit managers start tokenizing at scale. A $500M fund does not hold 50 giant, isolated loan positions anymore. Each one becomes digitally represented. A $100M loan becomes 100M digital units worth $1 each. Approved investors can own smaller pieces. Funds can rebalance positions instead of selling whole loans. Banks can distribute exposure. Family offices can participate. Institutions can move capital without waiting for one buyer willing to absorb the entire block. Now imagine those assets living on XRPL. A fund wants to raise liquidity. It sells tokenized interests through a Permissioned DEX. Another approved institution takes the other side. Settlement happens digitally. RLUSD provides the dollar liquidity. XRP can bridge where direct liquidity is thin. The fund gets cash. The buyer gets credit exposure. The loan keeps performing. Nothing has to be dismantled. That is a much more efficient market. Then lending infrastructure goes live. An institution holds $200M of tokenized private credit. It does not want to sell. It wants liquidity. Instead of exiting the position, it uses that asset inside XRPL credit infrastructure. Capital gets unlocked. The institution receives liquidity. Moves into RLUSD. Then routes part of that capital through XRP into EUR. Now look at what XRP is sitting between. Private credit. Stablecoin liquidity. FX. Lending. Collateral. Global settlement. That is not a small use case. Now scale it. $100B of private credit on XRPL. Then $500B. Then $1T. Thousands of tokenized loans. Thousands of institutions. Loans constantly being issued. Traded. Financed. Pledged. Refinanced. Settled. Each new asset adds another market. Each new market needs liquidity. Each new participant creates another flow. And a common liquid bridge becomes more valuable as the network gets more complex. That is where ripple:native can become institutional credit-market liquidity. Not just a payment token. Not just a crypto trade. Liquidity sitting underneath a digital credit economy. And if that starts happening at hundreds of billions or trillions in scale, the XRP price conversation changes too. Market makers need inventory. Liquidity providers need inventory. Vaults can hold XRP. More XRP gets deployed inside financial infrastructure. The amount of financial value XRP markets have to support gets larger. If XRP is worth $1, $1B of XRP liquidity requires 1B XRP. At $10, it takes 100M. At $100, 10M. The higher the value of XRP, the more dollar liquidity each unit can represent. So if XRPL ever becomes a serious home for institutional private credit, the market may eventually have to price XRP around a completely different economic role. That is the thesis I keep coming back to. Sandy Kaul is talking about tokenizing private credit. Anant Kumar is talking about solving access and liquidity. Benefit Street Partners is operating directly in that market. Franklin Templeton is already deep in private markets. VERT has already put real structured-credit activity onto XRPL infrastructure. Ripple is building the Lending Protocol. XLS-65 can pool capital. XLS-66 can create fixed-term credit. Permissioned DEXes can create controlled secondary markets. Credentials can control eligibility. ZILO and Licuido expand issuance and collateral mobility. And ripple:native sits inside the liquidity and credit architecture. These are not separate stories to me anymore. They are all pieces of the same direction. Credit becomes digital. Digital credit becomes easier to divide. Divided credit becomes easier to trade. Tradable credit needs liquidity. Liquidity needs infrastructure. XRPL is being built for that infrastructure. And ripple:native can become part of the capital moving underneath it. That is why I think this private-credit conversation is one of the most underrated ripple:native theses right now. The endgame is not simply banks sending XRP across borders. The endgame could be XRP sitting inside a financial system where trillions of dollars of loans, Treasuries, stablecoins, funds and collateral move through the same liquidity network. That is a much bigger market than payments alone. And if Ripple gets this right, private credit may end up being one of the places where the world finally understands what they have been building. Remember this thesis when private credit starts moving onchain. If you understand where private credit is heading, you understand why I’m watching ripple:native.
0:24

Do you want another ripple:native thesis on how Ripple is positioning XRP to modernize the whole financial system? Look at private credit. This is one of those markets most people never think about because it does not move like stocks, crypto, or even government bonds. A private-credit loan can be worth hundreds of millions of dollars. The borrower pays interest. The lender earns a return. The asset itself can be valuable. But there is one huge problem. It can be extremely hard to move. That is exactly what caught my attention in the Sandy Kaul and Anant Kumar discussion. Anant Kumar, from Benefit Street Partners, described the issue in a very simple way. Private credit has limited ownership. And it has almost no real secondary-market liquidity. A lender can originate a huge loan, but once that loan is sitting inside a fund, selling pieces of it is not as simple as selling a stock. That capital can stay trapped. Now imagine the same loan becoming digital. Not changing the economics of the loan. Not changing who the borrower is. Not changing who remains lender of record. Just changing how ownership can be represented. Instead of one giant $100M position sitting inside one structure, that loan could be represented as millions of smaller digital interests. Suddenly something that was hard to divide becomes divisible. Something that barely traded could potentially develop a secondary market. Something trapped inside one fund could become easier to distribute among approved investors. That is the part people should focus on. Because this is not some random idea coming from crypto Twitter. Sandy Kaul is Head of Digital Assets and Innovation at Franklin Templeton. Franklin Templeton manages roughly $1.78T. Anant Kumar is from Benefit Street Partners. And Franklin Templeton itself just closed a $1.5B Collateralized Fund Obligation tied to private equity secondaries and U.S. middle-market direct lending through Benefit Street Partners. So when they are talking about the problem of private-credit liquidity, they are talking about a market they actually operate inside. And this is where my ripple:native thesis gets much bigger. Because XRP Ledger is being built around the exact same problem. Not just payments. Not just moving stablecoins. Credit. Liquidity. Tokenized ownership. Secondary markets. Institutional lending. Collateral. That is what starts connecting everything. Private credit is already one of the largest categories inside tokenized real-world assets. Franklin Templeton’s own research says tokenized RWAs grew from around $5B in 2023 to more than $25B by early 2026. Private credit, Treasuries and real estate make up a major part of that growth. That tells me something important. Wall Street is not only tokenizing cash. It is beginning to tokenize assets that traditionally sit in some of the least liquid corners of finance. And private credit may be one of the biggest opportunities because liquidity is exactly where the pain is. Now look at XRPL. In 2025, VERT launched structured-credit infrastructure using XRP Ledger and its EVM sidechain. Its first live transaction was a BRL 700M Agribusiness Receivables Certificate. Roughly $130M. That is real structured credit. Recorded through infrastructure using XRPL. So when I hear Sandy Kaul and Anant Kumar talking about tokenizing private loans, I do not have to imagine whether XRPL could ever touch this market. It already has. That is only the beginning of the setup. The bigger piece is what Ripple is building directly into the network. The XRPL Lending Protocol. This is where everything starts making sense. Ripple has been very clear about the next stage of tokenization. Putting an asset onchain is not enough. A Treasury token sitting in a wallet is still just an asset sitting in a wallet. A private-credit token sitting in a wallet is still just a loan represented digitally. The real transformation happens when those assets can enter functioning capital markets. Borrowing. Lending. Liquidity. Collateral. Credit. That is exactly where the XRPL Lending Protocol is headed. Ripple explicitly names private credit among the assets that can move into this infrastructure, alongside Treasuries, money-market funds, stablecoins and commodities. That is a huge detail. Because private credit is not some side use case Ripple accidentally fits. It is literally one of the categories they are building around. Now add XLS-65. The Single Asset Vault design. This allows assets from multiple depositors to be pooled into one onchain vault. And that vault can hold XRP. Trust-line tokens. Or Multi-Purpose Tokens. Think about what that means in plain English. Today, one large institution may have to fund a giant private loan. Tomorrow, capital can potentially be pooled digitally. Thousands of approved investors contribute. The capital sits inside a common structure. A loan gets funded. The returns flow back through that structure. That is extremely close to what Anant Kumar is talking about when he says one loan could be split into smaller pieces. Now add XLS-66. The Lending Protocol. Fixed-term, uncollateralized lending. Credit underwriting stays offchain. The actual loan can be created and managed onchain. That detail matters more than people realize. Private credit is not anonymous DeFi. The borrower is evaluated. Creditworthiness matters. Interest matters. Terms matter. Default matters. Underwriting matters. XRPL is not trying to throw away that traditional credit process. It is trying to put the financial infrastructure around it onchain. That is why this feels much more institutional than a normal crypto lending protocol. And then you get to the liquidity problem. This is where Anant Kumar’s point becomes the whole thesis. Private-credit loans barely trade. If investors want redemptions, funds can have a problem. The assets may be good. The borrowers may be paying. But there may not be a deep market to sell into. That is trapped capital. Tokenization attacks that directly. Imagine one $100M private loan. Instead of treating it as one huge block, it becomes millions of smaller digital interests. Approved institutions can own pieces. Funds can rebalance. Banks can distribute exposure. Ownership can move without the whole loan changing hands as one giant object. Now put those interests on XRPL. They can be issued digitally. Held digitally. Transferred digitally. Settled digitally. Traded inside controlled markets. Used inside lending infrastructure. That is a completely different market structure. And XRPL is also building the control layer institutions need. Permissioned Domains. Permissioned DEXes. Credentials. Deep Freeze. Confidential Transfers. This is important because a bank is not going to take a $500M private-credit position and make it freely available to every random wallet in the world. Institutions need to control who can hold these assets. Who can trade them. Which jurisdiction they come from. Whether they satisfy eligibility rules. XRPL is being built for exactly that. You can have public blockchain infrastructure while still creating controlled markets where only approved participants transact. That solves one of the biggest objections banks have to permissionless finance. They do not need to choose between old closed systems and completely open anonymous markets. They can have digital assets with institutional rules built around them. That is where Permissioned DEXes become powerful. Imagine a tokenized private loan. Only approved investors can trade it. The loan still exists. The lender still exists. The borrower still exists. But now there is a secondary market. A fund needs liquidity? It can sell part of the position. Another institution wants exposure? It can buy a smaller piece. The market no longer depends on one giant bilateral transfer. That is how tokenization can start unlocking liquidity. And the more I look at this, the more I think ripple:native is being positioned for a much bigger role than people realize. Because every new tokenized asset creates another liquidity problem. Private credit token A. Private credit token B. Treasuries. Money-market funds. Stablecoins. Commercial paper. Tokenized deposits. Fund interests. Every asset needs somewhere to trade. Every institution needs somewhere to move value. Every market needs liquidity. You cannot have deep direct markets between every possible pair. That is where a common bridge asset becomes valuable. Private-credit token → ripple:native → RLUSD. RLUSD → ripple:native → another private-credit token. A European institution holds EUR liquidity and wants a U.S. private-credit position. EUR liquidity → ripple:native → RLUSD → tokenized credit. A fund wants to exit one credit position and move into another. Credit token A → ripple:native → RLUSD → credit token B. The more markets appear, the more possible routes exist. And the value of a common liquid bridge increases with the number of things it can connect. That is the part I think people still underestimate. ripple:native does not need every private-credit transaction to use XRP. It needs XRP to become useful wherever direct liquidity is weak. If XRPL becomes home to hundreds or thousands of tokenized credit instruments, there will always be fragmented liquidity somewhere. That is where deep XRP markets become valuable. Now add another piece that gets almost no attention. XRP itself can sit inside XLS-65 vault infrastructure. So XRP does not only have a potential role as bridge liquidity. It can also become pooled capital. That creates a completely different path. XRP goes into a vault. Vault capital gets pooled. The lending infrastructure uses that capital. Borrowers receive credit. Interest flows back through the structure. Now XRP is not just moving between markets. It is potentially sitting inside the capital base of the credit market itself. That is where the phrase “XRP utility is growing across payments, liquidity and credit markets” starts to make much more sense. Those are three completely different engines. Payments move value. Liquidity connects assets. Credit makes capital productive. Ripple is building around all three. Then you have ZILO and Licuido. Ripple invested in both to expand regulated transfer agency, tokenized issuance and collateral mobility on XRPL. That matters because a private-credit market is not just about issuing a token. Someone has to manage ownership records. Transfers. Servicing. Restrictions. Collateral. Secondary transactions. Settlement. If Ripple keeps adding these pieces, XRPL starts looking less like a blockchain with tokens on it and more like an operating system for financial assets. That is why Sandy Kaul’s broader thinking matters too. She has argued that blockchain is moving toward becoming a universal liquidity layer. Stablecoins. Tokenized cash. Lending. Collateral. Those are exactly the pieces appearing around XRPL. And I think private credit could be where this becomes impossible to ignore. Because the pain is so obvious. Imagine owning a valuable asset you cannot easily sell. That is private credit today. Imagine a fund holding billions in loans that barely trade. The assets are generating income. But if investors suddenly want cash, the fund cannot just tap a button and sell a fraction instantly. That is a huge weakness. Tokenization changes the unit of ownership. XRPL changes the infrastructure around that ownership. Permissioned markets change who can trade it. Lending turns those assets into productive capital. ripple:native can connect the liquidity between everything. That is the full setup. And now take it to the bullish extreme. Imagine private-credit managers start tokenizing at scale. A $500M fund does not hold 50 giant, isolated loan positions anymore. Each one becomes digitally represented. A $100M loan becomes 100M digital units worth $1 each. Approved investors can own smaller pieces. Funds can rebalance positions instead of selling whole loans. Banks can distribute exposure. Family offices can participate. Institutions can move capital without waiting for one buyer willing to absorb the entire block. Now imagine those assets living on XRPL. A fund wants to raise liquidity. It sells tokenized interests through a Permissioned DEX. Another approved institution takes the other side. Settlement happens digitally. RLUSD provides the dollar liquidity. XRP can bridge where direct liquidity is thin. The fund gets cash. The buyer gets credit exposure. The loan keeps performing. Nothing has to be dismantled. That is a much more efficient market. Then lending infrastructure goes live. An institution holds $200M of tokenized private credit. It does not want to sell. It wants liquidity. Instead of exiting the position, it uses that asset inside XRPL credit infrastructure. Capital gets unlocked. The institution receives liquidity. Moves into RLUSD. Then routes part of that capital through XRP into EUR. Now look at what XRP is sitting between. Private credit. Stablecoin liquidity. FX. Lending. Collateral. Global settlement. That is not a small use case. Now scale it. $100B of private credit on XRPL. Then $500B. Then $1T. Thousands of tokenized loans. Thousands of institutions. Loans constantly being issued. Traded. Financed. Pledged. Refinanced. Settled. Each new asset adds another market. Each new market needs liquidity. Each new participant creates another flow. And a common liquid bridge becomes more valuable as the network gets more complex. That is where ripple:native can become institutional credit-market liquidity. Not just a payment token. Not just a crypto trade. Liquidity sitting underneath a digital credit economy. And if that starts happening at hundreds of billions or trillions in scale, the XRP price conversation changes too. Market makers need inventory. Liquidity providers need inventory. Vaults can hold XRP. More XRP gets deployed inside financial infrastructure. The amount of financial value XRP markets have to support gets larger. If XRP is worth $1, $1B of XRP liquidity requires 1B XRP. At $10, it takes 100M. At $100, 10M. The higher the value of XRP, the more dollar liquidity each unit can represent. So if XRPL ever becomes a serious home for institutional private credit, the market may eventually have to price XRP around a completely different economic role. That is the thesis I keep coming back to. Sandy Kaul is talking about tokenizing private credit. Anant Kumar is talking about solving access and liquidity. Benefit Street Partners is operating directly in that market. Franklin Templeton is already deep in private markets. VERT has already put real structured-credit activity onto XRPL infrastructure. Ripple is building the Lending Protocol. XLS-65 can pool capital. XLS-66 can create fixed-term credit. Permissioned DEXes can create controlled secondary markets. Credentials can control eligibility. ZILO and Licuido expand issuance and collateral mobility. And ripple:native sits inside the liquidity and credit architecture. These are not separate stories to me anymore. They are all pieces of the same direction. Credit becomes digital. Digital credit becomes easier to divide. Divided credit becomes easier to trade. Tradable credit needs liquidity. Liquidity needs infrastructure. XRPL is being built for that infrastructure. And ripple:native can become part of the capital moving underneath it. That is why I think this private-credit conversation is one of the most underrated ripple:native theses right now. The endgame is not simply banks sending XRP across borders. The endgame could be XRP sitting inside a financial system where trillions of dollars of loans, Treasuries, stablecoins, funds and collateral move through the same liquidity network. That is a much bigger market than payments alone. And if Ripple gets this right, private credit may end up being one of the places where the world finally understands what they have been building. Remember this thesis when private credit starts moving onchain. If you understand where private credit is heading, you understand why I’m watching ripple:native.

X Finance Bull

16,025 görüntüleme • 13 gün önce

🚨NEW: Adam Curry nicely breaks down how Stablecoins work, Tether, and the likely future of the US Digital Dollar system. (Worth a watch if you don't know about this subject) "A stablecoin is a digital dollar thats pegged to the dollar so it's always a dollar. It's already being used all over the internet and the world. The only reason it's worth a dollar is because the stablecoin company that creates it has debt and paper to back it up. They buy America's debt, they buy treasury bonds or T-bills that pay a dividend that gives interest, and for each dollar they've bought in treasury they can create stablecoins. If you look at the company Tether they've bought more of the US debt than most countries. They have $160B worth of US debt. For each of those dollars they have a stablecoin. There's like 50 people in the company. They have $160B at 4% interest annually, they're making BANK just for holding this debt. I think that President Trump is very smart in seeing that we can flood the world with our stablecoin and we get a 2-for-1. We create a dollar of debt and we create another dollar that can be used all over the world as a reserve currency and that should result in some new monetary system that we need to come up with to have our dollar valued properly but also still remain the reserve currency and remain a strong export country. We don't make anything that we sell abroad, we can't all serve each other burgers and fries -- we have to build something. All of that went overseas. There's something big coming, and it has to happen. Trump is a meta guy. He's going to re-finance the country. It'll be digital and he Bitcoiners don't like this because they want Bitcoin to be the one currency that everyone uses but its now more like a digital gold that's much easier to move around. It's useful but it isn't money or currency the way it was originally intended -- but it is still very important and will be part of the US' strategic reserve. It looks to me like Stablecoins and Tether in particular will be the future of the US dollar payments. A lot of people on the right are afraid of being controlled on a grid because you can stop stablecoins -- but it seems there's no way of getting around some form of a digital dollar. I still like Bitcoin as a backup to protect from that control." Great breakdown Adam Curry - curryirc.com
4:51

🚨NEW: Adam Curry nicely breaks down how Stablecoins work, Tether, and the likely future of the US Digital Dollar system. (Worth a watch if you don't know about this subject) "A stablecoin is a digital dollar thats pegged to the dollar so it's always a dollar. It's already being used all over the internet and the world. The only reason it's worth a dollar is because the stablecoin company that creates it has debt and paper to back it up. They buy America's debt, they buy treasury bonds or T-bills that pay a dividend that gives interest, and for each dollar they've bought in treasury they can create stablecoins. If you look at the company Tether they've bought more of the US debt than most countries. They have $160B worth of US debt. For each of those dollars they have a stablecoin. There's like 50 people in the company. They have $160B at 4% interest annually, they're making BANK just for holding this debt. I think that President Trump is very smart in seeing that we can flood the world with our stablecoin and we get a 2-for-1. We create a dollar of debt and we create another dollar that can be used all over the world as a reserve currency and that should result in some new monetary system that we need to come up with to have our dollar valued properly but also still remain the reserve currency and remain a strong export country. We don't make anything that we sell abroad, we can't all serve each other burgers and fries -- we have to build something. All of that went overseas. There's something big coming, and it has to happen. Trump is a meta guy. He's going to re-finance the country. It'll be digital and he Bitcoiners don't like this because they want Bitcoin to be the one currency that everyone uses but its now more like a digital gold that's much easier to move around. It's useful but it isn't money or currency the way it was originally intended -- but it is still very important and will be part of the US' strategic reserve. It looks to me like Stablecoins and Tether in particular will be the future of the US dollar payments. A lot of people on the right are afraid of being controlled on a grid because you can stop stablecoins -- but it seems there's no way of getting around some form of a digital dollar. I still like Bitcoin as a backup to protect from that control." Great breakdown Adam Curry - curryirc.com

Autism Capital 🧩

365,662 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

We are excited to announce that Tether, the largest stablecoin company in the world, is making a strategic investment of $200M into Whop, valuing us at $1.6B. Our partnership with Tether marks a major step in building the world's largest internet market. Tether is committed to enabling everyone in the world to participate in the new internet economy. The way humans work and create value is changing fast. The world needs both an open internet market giving people a platform to conduct business, as well as a transparent payments network. Tether and Whop together will work to bring a sustainable income to billions of people throughout the world. There is enormous opportunity when you combine Tether’s global scale and wallet technology with Whop’s community of next generation entrepreneurs. My co-founders and I met as teenagers on the internet selling software. We first launched Whop as a way for us to sell our own software to people in Facebook and Discord forums. Prior to Whop, the place we found customers was different from the place we collected payments, different from the place we talked to customers, and there wasn’t a central place to “do business” on the internet. In partnership with Tether, we will be scaling infrastructure in real-time for new business models as they emerge across the globe. The job is just getting started. 🚀
0:56

We are excited to announce that Tether, the largest stablecoin company in the world, is making a strategic investment of $200M into Whop, valuing us at $1.6B. Our partnership with Tether marks a major step in building the world's largest internet market. Tether is committed to enabling everyone in the world to participate in the new internet economy. The way humans work and create value is changing fast. The world needs both an open internet market giving people a platform to conduct business, as well as a transparent payments network. Tether and Whop together will work to bring a sustainable income to billions of people throughout the world. There is enormous opportunity when you combine Tether’s global scale and wallet technology with Whop’s community of next generation entrepreneurs. My co-founders and I met as teenagers on the internet selling software. We first launched Whop as a way for us to sell our own software to people in Facebook and Discord forums. Prior to Whop, the place we found customers was different from the place we collected payments, different from the place we talked to customers, and there wasn’t a central place to “do business” on the internet. In partnership with Tether, we will be scaling infrastructure in real-time for new business models as they emerge across the globe. The job is just getting started. 🚀

Steven Schwartz 🦅

1,318,660 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Tether is the Black Swan in crypto. When it breaks, and it will, $BTC, $ETH, and everything tied to it will bleed out. That value won’t just vanish, it’ll migrate into tech built for real utility. That’s just one way $XRP will consolidate the space.
1:55

Tether is the Black Swan in crypto. When it breaks, and it will, $BTC, $ETH, and everything tied to it will bleed out. That value won’t just vanish, it’ll migrate into tech built for real utility. That’s just one way $XRP will consolidate the space.

Versan | Black Swan Capitalist

113,677 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce