Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Tethers lawyer Jason Weinstein claims that they produced forensic evidence showing that Tethers were fully backed every single day. That's strange. The CFTC said the exact opposite. How come Tether doesn't produce this forensic evidence for the public to see it, to end the FUD?

Bitfinex'ed 🔥🐧 Κασσάνδρα 🏺

109,782 subscribers

1,109,874 views • 3 years ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics Finance

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

9 Comments

Bitfinex'ed 🔥🐧 Κασσάνδρα 🏺3 years ago

Tethers Lawyer: We paid an outside firm to produce forensic evidence showing that Tethers were fully backed all of the time and sent that to the CFTC. Crypto: Can we see it? Tether: No, we'd rather just endlessly go on cocaine benders & complain about FUD instead of ending FUD.

Bitfinex'ed 🔥🐧 Κασσάνδρα 🏺3 years ago

The New York Court, and Tethers other lawyers, also disagree with Jason Weinstein. They backed Tethers with volatile Bitcoins, instead of dollars. So who's telling the truth? The court: "There is no reserve." It's all commingled assets, just like the FTX fraud.

Bitfinex'ed 🔥🐧 Κασσάνδρα 🏺3 years ago

Tether lawyers literally can't stop lying.

ⓣⓗⓔ ⓚⓘⓝⓖ ⓣⓐⓡⓘⓠ3 years ago

TVSGJdPNkDSX5mS6cs94JboG8NV4okrSKs

Dochb3 years ago

Cause...they...can't.

FreeX3 years ago

Attorney General's Office admitted that they didn't find any evidence that Tether is doing wrong. Tether just misinform the public that not all the reserves are in dollar but actually cash and cash equivalent. After that they put the breakdown of the reserves in their website.

Shorter333🌍3 years ago

my bank aint fully backed either

Jason Bennick3 years ago

House of cards. Many, many decks make up that house. Still, yet a house of cards.

j3 years ago

They locked it away in Satoshi's Wallet.

Related Videos

Top Biden spokesman John Kirby shrugs off the cocaine scandal inside the Biden White House: "I can't really speak to the investigation that was done by the Secret Service ... they just were not able to come up with any forensic evidence that proves it"

Top Biden spokesman John Kirby shrugs off the cocaine scandal inside the Biden White House: "I can't really speak to the investigation that was done by the Secret Service ... they just were not able to come up with any forensic evidence that proves it"

RNC Research

61,203 views • 3 years ago

'So they deliberately withheld the evidence showing that she was innocent & continued with an aggressive & entirely unjustified prosecution?' Director of a forensic accountancy firm appointed in 2012 to investigate the faulty Horizon IT system, claims the Post Office knowingly withheld information from subpostmasters who were accused of wrongdoing.

'So they deliberately withheld the evidence showing that she was innocent & continued with an aggressive & entirely unjustified prosecution?' Director of a forensic accountancy firm appointed in 2012 to investigate the faulty Horizon IT system, claims the Post Office knowingly withheld information from subpostmasters who were accused of wrongdoing.

Good Morning Britain

525,939 views • 2 years ago

"She's lying." Forensic accountant, Ian Henderson claims that Paula Vennells was "misleading parliament" when she said there were no evidence of miscarriages of justice during investigations at the Post Office in 2015.

"She's lying." Forensic accountant, Ian Henderson claims that Paula Vennells was "misleading parliament" when she said there were no evidence of miscarriages of justice during investigations at the Post Office in 2015.

Channel 4 News

175,069 views • 2 years ago

Attorney Baron Coleman told his audience the exact opposite of what the forensic analyst testified under oath. The testimony is clear. The post reversed it. So why are so many people willing to distort clear evidence? When the facts and evidence must be twisted to protect the narrative, that isn’t skepticism. It’s indoctrination. It’s deception. And at this point, you can’t reason someone out of fool’s slop if they love wallowing in it. Watch the testimony for yourself. Then decide who is telling you the truth.

Attorney Baron Coleman told his audience the exact opposite of what the forensic analyst testified under oath. The testimony is clear. The post reversed it. So why are so many people willing to distort clear evidence? When the facts and evidence must be twisted to protect the narrative, that isn’t skepticism. It’s indoctrination. It’s deception. And at this point, you can’t reason someone out of fool’s slop if they love wallowing in it. Watch the testimony for yourself. Then decide who is telling you the truth.

Matthew Maher

27,647 views • 2 months ago

"Every single serious person that's looked at the evidence says it's damning to her. It's an open and shut case." Forensic accountant Sam Antar reacts to NY AG Letitia James being investigated by the DOJ. Lidia Curanaj

"Every single serious person that's looked at the evidence says it's damning to her. It's an open and shut case." Forensic accountant Sam Antar reacts to NY AG Letitia James being investigated by the DOJ. Lidia Curanaj

NEWSMAX

120,878 views • 1 year ago

Never forget, it was non-Archaeologists that first discovered that the head of the Sphinx had been re-carved! Robert M Schoch along with John Anthony West brought this World-wide attention decades ago 🔥 Forensic evidence proved they were right, and Archaeologists wrong…

Never forget, it was non-Archaeologists that first discovered that the head of the Sphinx had been re-carved! Robert M Schoch along with John Anthony West brought this World-wide attention decades ago 🔥 Forensic evidence proved they were right, and Archaeologists wrong…

Jimmy Corsetti

206,753 views • 8 months ago

Ron Johnson confronts Dr. Fauci with a huge stack of papers, each one showing that ivermectin WORKS. JOHNSON: "You said there's no evidence that ivermectin is helpful." "On that exact same day... There was a website that was tracking the randomized controlled studies." "Here they are showing 60, 70% efficacy of ivermectin. The same day you say there's no evidence. There was all kinds of evidence."

Ron Johnson confronts Dr. Fauci with a huge stack of papers, each one showing that ivermectin WORKS. JOHNSON: "You said there's no evidence that ivermectin is helpful." "On that exact same day... There was a website that was tracking the randomized controlled studies." "Here they are showing 60, 70% efficacy of ivermectin. The same day you say there's no evidence. There was all kinds of evidence."

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

730,988 views • 1 month ago

Tyler Robinson's defense admits that they have not reviewed all the evidence provided to them in the case, doesn't believe they need to review it all, and that paralegals are still "organizing." Claims they "haven't had that time."

Tyler Robinson's defense admits that they have not reviewed all the evidence provided to them in the case, doesn't believe they need to review it all, and that paralegals are still "organizing." Claims they "haven't had that time."

Libby Emmons

64,253 views • 4 months ago

There were hearings like this one in Arizona, in every swing state prior to the illegal certification of the 2020 election. They told you there was no evidence, but it was always there, right out in the open. Mounds of forensic evidence was shared by expert witnesses, and testimony after testimony by concerned citizens who witnessed fraud, and who swore under oath in affidavits. They thought they were smart using Runbeck, but they didn’t know that Trump used watermarked ballots. Trump just shared this video, and several others that I am about to share. The 💩 is about to hit the fan!

There were hearings like this one in Arizona, in every swing state prior to the illegal certification of the 2020 election. They told you there was no evidence, but it was always there, right out in the open. Mounds of forensic evidence was shared by expert witnesses, and testimony after testimony by concerned citizens who witnessed fraud, and who swore under oath in affidavits. They thought they were smart using Runbeck, but they didn’t know that Trump used watermarked ballots. Trump just shared this video, and several others that I am about to share. The 💩 is about to hit the fan!

RealAF Patriot

29,418 views • 8 months ago

Finally this Hearsay Report with million errors Here is the Constitutional exposing the errors of law 1. They admitted the Hearsay Evidence from Vuyo Zungula and Arthur Frazer without following the admissibility procedures. 2. The never tested the information before it. That's an error of law 3. The report has lies that Mustafa Hazim (The Buyer) doesn't exist , only to find that he does exist. 4. The Panel was tasked to find SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE, What they found is PRIMA FACIE evidence The panel failed to do what they were tasked to do

Finally this Hearsay Report with million errors Here is the Constitutional exposing the errors of law 1. They admitted the Hearsay Evidence from Vuyo Zungula and Arthur Frazer without following the admissibility procedures. 2. The never tested the information before it. That's an error of law 3. The report has lies that Mustafa Hazim (The Buyer) doesn't exist , only to find that he does exist. 4. The Panel was tasked to find SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE, What they found is PRIMA FACIE evidence The panel failed to do what they were tasked to do

RET ARE THIEVES

52,566 views • 4 months ago

When reporting cyber crime, it's important that every evidence is well preserved and presented to the police. Learn how to record every evidence properly so that it helps the investigation. #AkanchaSrivastavaFoundation #India #CyberSafety

When reporting cyber crime, it's important that every evidence is well preserved and presented to the police. Learn how to record every evidence properly so that it helps the investigation. #AkanchaSrivastavaFoundation #India #CyberSafety

Akancha Srivastava

37,920 views • 1 month ago

Collins: Isn’t it supposed to be the evidence that leads you to pursue an impeachment inquiry? Mace: That's what the inquiry is for, to get more evidence.

Collins: Isn’t it supposed to be the evidence that leads you to pursue an impeachment inquiry? Mace: That's what the inquiry is for, to get more evidence.

Acyn

2,036,964 views • 3 years ago