Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

Text-gate came up & it’s still shady especially since back in December Erika confidently said that she had Charlie’s phone & that he didn’t receive any messages about being worried that he was going to be deleted. Then the messages magically appeared when Erika rushed to meet with Candace...

walk_by_f4ith's profile picture

Belle

2,698 subscribers

67,221 views • 25 days ago •via X (Twitter)

News & Politics
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Andrew went to TPUSA and asked for evidence to dispute all the BS Candace and the other minions have been saying for months. He said they were happy to give it to him. He also says he will give everyone evidence that on Friday all this will be dropped. - Erika was not at Ft H. He says the entire Ft H conspiracy will be blown out of the water. Mitch and Stew Peters are screwed. But also if the evidence shows this the Harpole case is a in a great position. - Where Erika was when Charlie died - Charlie wanted Erika to take over - The text - That Candace was after TPUSA almost as soon as Charlie died. I bet it’s texts and emails from Candace wanting to go back to TPUSA and being told no but I could be wrong. And more….. That what he shows will shut down all the conspiracies. This is what Candace is so mad about. She knew when that text was read that Andrew had more than just that. We shall see. I hope it’s iron clad.
1:34

Andrew went to TPUSA and asked for evidence to dispute all the BS Candace and the other minions have been saying for months. He said they were happy to give it to him. He also says he will give everyone evidence that on Friday all this will be dropped. - Erika was not at Ft H. He says the entire Ft H conspiracy will be blown out of the water. Mitch and Stew Peters are screwed. But also if the evidence shows this the Harpole case is a in a great position. - Where Erika was when Charlie died - Charlie wanted Erika to take over - The text - That Candace was after TPUSA almost as soon as Charlie died. I bet it’s texts and emails from Candace wanting to go back to TPUSA and being told no but I could be wrong. And more….. That what he shows will shut down all the conspiracies. This is what Candace is so mad about. She knew when that text was read that Andrew had more than just that. We shall see. I hope it’s iron clad.

Raven Grace - Operative #22/92

36,934 views • 22 days ago

Erika Kirk says Candace Owens is lying — Charlie did not text anyone the day before he was murdered saying, “They’re going to Kill me.” She says she knows because she has his phone. 🔻 Context: Frank Turek said a few times, in the months leading up to Charlie’s murder, he told Charlie he hopes he increased his security — Charlie responded, “I have. They want me dead.” Frank said he didn’t know who he meant by “They”. Frank assumed he just meant leftists. These text messages of course aren’t from the day before… but provide context that maybe Charlie was in that state of mind due to all the pressure he was under. Candace claims a few individuals received text messages from Charlie the night before claiming “they’re going to kill me”, allegedly that he sent during a call he had with certain people. She says they’ve asked her not to share those messages. Candace encouraged them to come forward. As of right now, I’m inclined to believe Erika unless something gets released. Erika Frank Clip 1 Frank Clip 2
0:15

Erika Kirk says Candace Owens is lying — Charlie did not text anyone the day before he was murdered saying, “They’re going to Kill me.” She says she knows because she has his phone. 🔻 Context: Frank Turek said a few times, in the months leading up to Charlie’s murder, he told Charlie he hopes he increased his security — Charlie responded, “I have. They want me dead.” Frank said he didn’t know who he meant by “They”. Frank assumed he just meant leftists. These text messages of course aren’t from the day before… but provide context that maybe Charlie was in that state of mind due to all the pressure he was under. Candace claims a few individuals received text messages from Charlie the night before claiming “they’re going to kill me”, allegedly that he sent during a call he had with certain people. She says they’ve asked her not to share those messages. Candace encouraged them to come forward. As of right now, I’m inclined to believe Erika unless something gets released. Erika Frank Clip 1 Frank Clip 2

MJTruthUltra

973,982 views • 9 months ago

So Matt Walsh. In December he was asking people including Candace to leave Erika alone. And that Candace was basically acting like Alex Jones. I think we now know what the Dec phone call was about. He was telling her to stop it. Then in March he asks again. And states he talked to Erika before she had even told the kids their father was dead. We all know where Candace is going with Matt now. He had only talked to Erika twice before Charlie’s death but he talked to Erika right after? Candace will use this in her continuation of DW was part of it last night. She’s going to start going down everyone in DW maybe and finding a reason they were part of it . Just thinking out loud. Candace never names someone out without attacking them next. She said we would get to him later this week. She can’t deny the evidence at trial so she’s going to start going after people. I said that yesterday. And remember he skipped going to the C4C with her in March too. I bet this is why. Don’t they go to church together?
0:25

So Matt Walsh. In December he was asking people including Candace to leave Erika alone. And that Candace was basically acting like Alex Jones. I think we now know what the Dec phone call was about. He was telling her to stop it. Then in March he asks again. And states he talked to Erika before she had even told the kids their father was dead. We all know where Candace is going with Matt now. He had only talked to Erika twice before Charlie’s death but he talked to Erika right after? Candace will use this in her continuation of DW was part of it last night. She’s going to start going down everyone in DW maybe and finding a reason they were part of it . Just thinking out loud. Candace never names someone out without attacking them next. She said we would get to him later this week. She can’t deny the evidence at trial so she’s going to start going after people. I said that yesterday. And remember he skipped going to the C4C with her in March too. I bet this is why. Don’t they go to church together?

Raven Grace 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

108,129 views • 1 month ago

‼️The Never-Before-Seen (And Still NOT SEEN) Text That PROVED Andrew Wilson Was TPUSA’s Guy The second he pulled out his phone and started reading that “never before seen” text message, Candace knew the whole thing was over. Wilson had refused to let Turning Point publicly claim him as their guy. He insisted he had nothing to do with them. Then in the first three minutes of the debate he drops an exclusive message allegedly from Charlie the day before he was killed: “Remind them that they are there for one person’s security only because I’m somewhat worried the left is trying to kill me.” Candace called this exact message out months ago. She said Erika Kirk was lying about it. Erika went on Glenn Beck claiming it was on Signal, that the messages auto-deleted, and that she didn’t even know it existed. Candace said that was a double lie — the message was on iMessage. If this text really existed and supported their narrative, why did Turning Point sit on it for months? Why didn’t they give it to police? Why was Andrew Wilson the first person to “reveal” it on a debate stage? He promised he’d drop the full message on his own show. We are all STILL waiting. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇
4:46

‼️The Never-Before-Seen (And Still NOT SEEN) Text That PROVED Andrew Wilson Was TPUSA’s Guy The second he pulled out his phone and started reading that “never before seen” text message, Candace knew the whole thing was over. Wilson had refused to let Turning Point publicly claim him as their guy. He insisted he had nothing to do with them. Then in the first three minutes of the debate he drops an exclusive message allegedly from Charlie the day before he was killed: “Remind them that they are there for one person’s security only because I’m somewhat worried the left is trying to kill me.” Candace called this exact message out months ago. She said Erika Kirk was lying about it. Erika went on Glenn Beck claiming it was on Signal, that the messages auto-deleted, and that she didn’t even know it existed. Candace said that was a double lie — the message was on iMessage. If this text really existed and supported their narrative, why did Turning Point sit on it for months? Why didn’t they give it to police? Why was Andrew Wilson the first person to “reveal” it on a debate stage? He promised he’d drop the full message on his own show. We are all STILL waiting. FOLLOW Candace Owens, RT and watch her FULL episode linked below.👇

Project Constitution

121,916 views • 22 days ago

Watch Candace Owens lies to her audience and rewrites history... In December, during her sit-down with Erika Kirk, Candace said they didn’t have access to additional evidence - and that authorities “could very well” have more evidence they simply couldn’t share with the victim’s friends and family. Today, she told her audience: “When I sat down with Erika, I explained to you that her lawyer told me that right now we don’t have any evidence. Right now (Dec 2025), the state is going to go out there and find the evidence.” Not only does she gaslight her audience about what she previously said, she also expects them to believe Tyler Robinson was arrested and charged with no evidence - which is completely implausible and idiotic.
0:52

Watch Candace Owens lies to her audience and rewrites history... In December, during her sit-down with Erika Kirk, Candace said they didn’t have access to additional evidence - and that authorities “could very well” have more evidence they simply couldn’t share with the victim’s friends and family. Today, she told her audience: “When I sat down with Erika, I explained to you that her lawyer told me that right now we don’t have any evidence. Right now (Dec 2025), the state is going to go out there and find the evidence.” Not only does she gaslight her audience about what she previously said, she also expects them to believe Tyler Robinson was arrested and charged with no evidence - which is completely implausible and idiotic.

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

44,495 views • 5 months ago

“Charlie was a product to everybody else. He was not a human being. He was a product that they felt that they had manufactured…and they felt that he was now malfunctioning.” I had said previously that Candace wants us to believe she was Charlie’s only friend, and now she’s just coming right out and saying that. This was her response to Taylor Lorenz of all people (brilliant mind that she is) asking why it seems like only Candace is mourning him as a friend. So when Candace says “everybody else,” she means everybody else. She’s the only exception. It’s propaganda I’m still not falling for. Moreover, for it to be true, Charlie would have to be a naive moron with an awful judge of character.
1:12

“Charlie was a product to everybody else. He was not a human being. He was a product that they felt that they had manufactured…and they felt that he was now malfunctioning.” I had said previously that Candace wants us to believe she was Charlie’s only friend, and now she’s just coming right out and saying that. This was her response to Taylor Lorenz of all people (brilliant mind that she is) asking why it seems like only Candace is mourning him as a friend. So when Candace says “everybody else,” she means everybody else. She’s the only exception. It’s propaganda I’m still not falling for. Moreover, for it to be true, Charlie would have to be a naive moron with an awful judge of character.

Natalie Jean Beisner

36,640 views • 10 months ago

Brandon Tatum (after saying Candace has "convinced" him, multiple times, that there was an assassination threat on her and that the "proof" warranted the US government needed to look into after talking with Candace Owens) says that he hasn't seen the evidence directly, but believes Candace. He told Candace to send him the evidence on an encrypted communications app. Basically, he said he believes her, believes that she has credible evidence, said there is "proof," said that the US government needs to investigate, but wants to clarify he didn't say he saw the evidence, even though Candace convinced him it's all true. Hope this helps.
0:47

Brandon Tatum (after saying Candace has "convinced" him, multiple times, that there was an assassination threat on her and that the "proof" warranted the US government needed to look into after talking with Candace Owens) says that he hasn't seen the evidence directly, but believes Candace. He told Candace to send him the evidence on an encrypted communications app. Basically, he said he believes her, believes that she has credible evidence, said there is "proof," said that the US government needs to investigate, but wants to clarify he didn't say he saw the evidence, even though Candace convinced him it's all true. Hope this helps.

Evan Kilgore 🇺🇸

35,553 views • 9 months ago

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk Candace Owens believes Erika Kirk lied again about her husband sending messages on his phone stating he was going to be murdered When this claim first surfaced, Erika initially denied it, but later she confirmed that Charlie did in fact send it on Telegram. Candace says she’s confirmed now that Erika lied again, stating the messages were in fact an iMessage on Charlie’s phone, verified by Dan Flood’s phone. She goes on to say that Erika was in the Hamptons when Netanyahu called and offered to take TPUSA to the next level., but “she can’t remember that particular detail.” Clip Full Show
0:48

UPDATE: Charlie Kirk Candace Owens believes Erika Kirk lied again about her husband sending messages on his phone stating he was going to be murdered When this claim first surfaced, Erika initially denied it, but later she confirmed that Charlie did in fact send it on Telegram. Candace says she’s confirmed now that Erika lied again, stating the messages were in fact an iMessage on Charlie’s phone, verified by Dan Flood’s phone. She goes on to say that Erika was in the Hamptons when Netanyahu called and offered to take TPUSA to the next level., but “she can’t remember that particular detail.” Clip Full Show

MJTruthUltra

64,033 views • 7 months ago

🚨REVEALED: Candace Reveals Charlie Kirk’s FINAL Text The Night Before He Was Taken Out —She Exposes the Spiritual Journey They Tried to Hide 🙏 Candace Owens reveals the truth about Charlie Kirk’s final days. The "Zionist donors" were squeezing him. They threatened his funding. They forced him to cut ties with friends like Candace. Charlie Kirk was changing. And the people who controlled his money hated it. In this emotional clip, Candace Owens reveals the spiritual journey Charlie was on in his final year. He was asking deep philosophical and spiritual questions. He was moving away from the Zionist agenda. He was disgusted by what the Daily Wire did to Candace. "Israel was trying to control his legacy and pretend that transition wasn't happening. "Candace says it was crucial for her to speak up because they were trying to rewrite history. They wanted you to remember him as a Zionist puppet. Candace wants you to remember him as a man who finally broke free. "He was done with Israel... and the next thing you know, he was gone. "Coincidence? Candace doesn't think so. FOLLOW Hodgetwins and go watch their FULL INTERVIEW with Candace Owens linked below.👇
2:12

🚨REVEALED: Candace Reveals Charlie Kirk’s FINAL Text The Night Before He Was Taken Out —She Exposes the Spiritual Journey They Tried to Hide 🙏 Candace Owens reveals the truth about Charlie Kirk’s final days. The "Zionist donors" were squeezing him. They threatened his funding. They forced him to cut ties with friends like Candace. Charlie Kirk was changing. And the people who controlled his money hated it. In this emotional clip, Candace Owens reveals the spiritual journey Charlie was on in his final year. He was asking deep philosophical and spiritual questions. He was moving away from the Zionist agenda. He was disgusted by what the Daily Wire did to Candace. "Israel was trying to control his legacy and pretend that transition wasn't happening. "Candace says it was crucial for her to speak up because they were trying to rewrite history. They wanted you to remember him as a Zionist puppet. Candace wants you to remember him as a man who finally broke free. "He was done with Israel... and the next thing you know, he was gone. "Coincidence? Candace doesn't think so. FOLLOW Hodgetwins and go watch their FULL INTERVIEW with Candace Owens linked below.👇

Project Constitution

58,333 views • 6 months ago

So Andrew Wilson is currently live on YouTube after stating that he would release the text messages of Charlie Kirk claiming "the Left" was going to kill him (the very thing Erika Kirk said didn't exist months ago btw). There are a few important things to note about this live stream that I think you'd find disturbing. Outside of the incessant profanity (even for him) that he has used already, he has told SEVERAL LIES in just the first 10 minutes, including: Says that he reached out to Erika and TPUSA and that they IMMEDIATELY responded and were extremely cooperative in providing evidence to clear themselves and substantiate their alibis. He also claims that none of the people making allegations against them, such as Candace Owens , Stew Peters , and others, ever reached out ONCE to simply ask, in good faith, for the evidence. We know this isn't true based on social media alone, because Candace has publicly asked. Erika, TPUSA, Andrew Kolvet, Blake Neff, etc. to provide any proof or evidence they have and to have an open conversation publicly to answer the questions that so many people—including those who donated to TPUSA—have about the holes in their stories and the investigation. They have refused to provide anything. Andrew claims otherwise. He lied that Candace fought him on Tyler admitting to Lance that he could be seen on campus. Not fully true. Candace clearly said that it may be true but she doesn't THINK that it is and needs it to be fact-checked. Lies that Candace and many of us are “cooperating” with Unf** America. Exchanging replies on X is considered “cooperating” with “the Left.” Claims that Candace backtracked on stating Erika should go to jail for murdering Charlie Kirk. Not onyl did Candace never say this but she cleared this up in great detail during the "debate." The worst part??? He tricked the audience because NOW he is claiming that he won't release the alleged text message from Charlie until FRIDAY—despite previously making it seem like he was going to release it much today?! It gets worse. When you attempt to comment under the video, the disclaimer pops up and says that “Only channel subscribers of 20 minutes or longer can send messages.” Dude, what?! You also do not have the option to rewind his video while it’s live, which also is weird, so that it forces new viewers to have to go back and watch from the beginning if they are late (as most live viewers usually are). Didn't Andrew state in his humiliation ritual with Candace Owens that it's “wrong to benefit off of a good man's life/death”? This was just in the first 10-15 minutes...
2:31

So Andrew Wilson is currently live on YouTube after stating that he would release the text messages of Charlie Kirk claiming "the Left" was going to kill him (the very thing Erika Kirk said didn't exist months ago btw). There are a few important things to note about this live stream that I think you'd find disturbing. Outside of the incessant profanity (even for him) that he has used already, he has told SEVERAL LIES in just the first 10 minutes, including: Says that he reached out to Erika and TPUSA and that they IMMEDIATELY responded and were extremely cooperative in providing evidence to clear themselves and substantiate their alibis. He also claims that none of the people making allegations against them, such as Candace Owens , Stew Peters , and others, ever reached out ONCE to simply ask, in good faith, for the evidence. We know this isn't true based on social media alone, because Candace has publicly asked. Erika, TPUSA, Andrew Kolvet, Blake Neff, etc. to provide any proof or evidence they have and to have an open conversation publicly to answer the questions that so many people—including those who donated to TPUSA—have about the holes in their stories and the investigation. They have refused to provide anything. Andrew claims otherwise. He lied that Candace fought him on Tyler admitting to Lance that he could be seen on campus. Not fully true. Candace clearly said that it may be true but she doesn't THINK that it is and needs it to be fact-checked. Lies that Candace and many of us are “cooperating” with Unf** America. Exchanging replies on X is considered “cooperating” with “the Left.” Claims that Candace backtracked on stating Erika should go to jail for murdering Charlie Kirk. Not onyl did Candace never say this but she cleared this up in great detail during the "debate." The worst part??? He tricked the audience because NOW he is claiming that he won't release the alleged text message from Charlie until FRIDAY—despite previously making it seem like he was going to release it much today?! It gets worse. When you attempt to comment under the video, the disclaimer pops up and says that “Only channel subscribers of 20 minutes or longer can send messages.” Dude, what?! You also do not have the option to rewind his video while it’s live, which also is weird, so that it forces new viewers to have to go back and watch from the beginning if they are late (as most live viewers usually are). Didn't Andrew state in his humiliation ritual with Candace Owens that it's “wrong to benefit off of a good man's life/death”? This was just in the first 10-15 minutes...

DDGotAPodcast

221,691 views • 23 days ago

I want to make a clarification. Brandon Tatum (after saying Candace has "convinced" him, multiple times, that there was a legitimate assassination threat on her life and that the "proof" warranted the US government needing to look into it) said that he hasn't directly seen the evidence, but believes Candace "wouldn't lie" to him. He told Candace to send him the evidence on an encrypted communications app and will likely see the alleged evidence soon. Basically, he said he believes Candace, believes that she has credible evidence and that he wouldn't lie to her, said that the US government needs to investigate the "proof," but wants to clarify he didn't say he saw the evidence, even though Candace convinced him it's all true after the "stuff" they talked about regarding the evidence. Yes, he said he "would never support or endorse anyone without seeing evidence" although he quite literally endorses Candace and tells us he's "convinced" shes telling the truth... which doesn't quite make sense and he doesn't follow his own logic, but they're his words and not mine. Hope this context helps!
0:51

I want to make a clarification. Brandon Tatum (after saying Candace has "convinced" him, multiple times, that there was a legitimate assassination threat on her life and that the "proof" warranted the US government needing to look into it) said that he hasn't directly seen the evidence, but believes Candace "wouldn't lie" to him. He told Candace to send him the evidence on an encrypted communications app and will likely see the alleged evidence soon. Basically, he said he believes Candace, believes that she has credible evidence and that he wouldn't lie to her, said that the US government needs to investigate the "proof," but wants to clarify he didn't say he saw the evidence, even though Candace convinced him it's all true after the "stuff" they talked about regarding the evidence. Yes, he said he "would never support or endorse anyone without seeing evidence" although he quite literally endorses Candace and tells us he's "convinced" shes telling the truth... which doesn't quite make sense and he doesn't follow his own logic, but they're his words and not mine. Hope this context helps!

Evan Kilgore 🇺🇸

81,316 views • 9 months ago

So I happened to remember a clip of Candace right after Charlie was killed and her saying she loved Erika as soon as she met her. And she told him to go for it!! Now she’s saying basically Erika was just a rebound and she didn’t think Erika would be more than a girlfriend and that Erika basically was saying all the right things to get Charlie. However, Charlie’s recollection of how he fell in love with her is much different. Candace Baby you’re lying again. So which was it? You loved her and pushed him to go for it? Or you thought she was a rebound and would only ever be just a girlfriend until he found someone else? Candace can’t even stop lying. Sounds like he was falling from the first moment they met not that he was going to use Erika to make someone jealous. That wasn’t who Charlie was Candace. You made him sound so shallow and you know he wasn’t that type of man.
0:38

So I happened to remember a clip of Candace right after Charlie was killed and her saying she loved Erika as soon as she met her. And she told him to go for it!! Now she’s saying basically Erika was just a rebound and she didn’t think Erika would be more than a girlfriend and that Erika basically was saying all the right things to get Charlie. However, Charlie’s recollection of how he fell in love with her is much different. Candace Baby you’re lying again. So which was it? You loved her and pushed him to go for it? Or you thought she was a rebound and would only ever be just a girlfriend until he found someone else? Candace can’t even stop lying. Sounds like he was falling from the first moment they met not that he was going to use Erika to make someone jealous. That wasn’t who Charlie was Candace. You made him sound so shallow and you know he wasn’t that type of man.

Raven Grace 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

52,121 views • 3 months ago

Candace Owens mocked that, in the latest defamation lawsuit against her, Brian Harpole said he didn’t give her an alibi in December for the absurd claim he was at Fort Huachuca military base the day before Charlie Kirk died - because he didn’t want Candace to engagement farm off his response. Which is EXACTLY what she did. To Erika Kirk and others when they provided alibis for this exact wild claim. Even holding an X Space where she titled it "Fort Huachuca: Why it suddenly matters" - because people had provided alibis. Candace now claims that if Harpole had simply given her an alibi, she would have let the entire thing go. The COMPLETE OPPOSITE of what she actually did. In that Space, she directly argues that providing an alibi proves guilt. And says that if Erika and others hadn’t responded, she would have dropped it - Which is exactly what Harpole did. As always zero consistency. Entirely BS. These kinds of games won't fly in court.
1:07

Candace Owens mocked that, in the latest defamation lawsuit against her, Brian Harpole said he didn’t give her an alibi in December for the absurd claim he was at Fort Huachuca military base the day before Charlie Kirk died - because he didn’t want Candace to engagement farm off his response. Which is EXACTLY what she did. To Erika Kirk and others when they provided alibis for this exact wild claim. Even holding an X Space where she titled it "Fort Huachuca: Why it suddenly matters" - because people had provided alibis. Candace now claims that if Harpole had simply given her an alibi, she would have let the entire thing go. The COMPLETE OPPOSITE of what she actually did. In that Space, she directly argues that providing an alibi proves guilt. And says that if Erika and others hadn’t responded, she would have dropped it - Which is exactly what Harpole did. As always zero consistency. Entirely BS. These kinds of games won't fly in court.

Nathan Livingstone (MilkBarTV)

94,851 views • 4 months ago

He continued in the first part with the evidence letting her go, because he didn’t want her walking out until it was his turn. And now we know why. He had an agenda to get her to admit everything she’s said has been rhetorical theater. No evidence. I still think the “turning point” with Candace is she thought they’d invite her back to TPUSA after Charlie’s death, and she’d be able to run it or be back on the stage. When that didn’t happen, vengeance became the theme. That’s why she was so nice at first, then turned on them all.
0:18

He continued in the first part with the evidence letting her go, because he didn’t want her walking out until it was his turn. And now we know why. He had an agenda to get her to admit everything she’s said has been rhetorical theater. No evidence. I still think the “turning point” with Candace is she thought they’d invite her back to TPUSA after Charlie’s death, and she’d be able to run it or be back on the stage. When that didn’t happen, vengeance became the theme. That’s why she was so nice at first, then turned on them all.

Raven Grace - Operative #22/92

34,984 views • 25 days ago

On multiple occasions over the past few months, Candace has said that she never suspected Erika—until their sitdown in December, when Erika “lied” to her face, which started her suspicions. But if you actually go back and watch Candace’s episode the day after her sitdown with Erika, Candace tells the opposite story—even going to so far as to say she was “refreshed” by Erika “owning the lies” during that sitdown. I encourage everyone to go back and refresh yourself on that episode; then compare it to how Candace talks about that sitdown in the present day. Over time, she’s deceptively edited the story—pretending like her recent cruel attacks on Erika were catalyzed by that sitdown, the same sitdown in which Erika “owned the lies” according to Candace herself last December. This is exactly what Candace has done with the Mitch Snow/Fort Huachuca story—pretending she initially wasn’t that interested in it, when her own receipts say differently.
0:29

On multiple occasions over the past few months, Candace has said that she never suspected Erika—until their sitdown in December, when Erika “lied” to her face, which started her suspicions. But if you actually go back and watch Candace’s episode the day after her sitdown with Erika, Candace tells the opposite story—even going to so far as to say she was “refreshed” by Erika “owning the lies” during that sitdown. I encourage everyone to go back and refresh yourself on that episode; then compare it to how Candace talks about that sitdown in the present day. Over time, she’s deceptively edited the story—pretending like her recent cruel attacks on Erika were catalyzed by that sitdown, the same sitdown in which Erika “owned the lies” according to Candace herself last December. This is exactly what Candace has done with the Mitch Snow/Fort Huachuca story—pretending she initially wasn’t that interested in it, when her own receipts say differently.

Natalie Jean Beisner

26,751 views • 3 months ago

“Why did he want Candace back?” If Charlie actually wanted Candace back, why didn’t he text her to invite her back? There were 48 hours from the time he texted that PRIVATE text in the group chat to the time he was assassinated…if he was so sure, why didn’t he text her? And if—as she claims—he wanted her back because she’d warned him about all these people, then why didn’t he text her the night before when he was so afraid he was going to be killed? Wouldn’t she be the first person he’d text? Definitely on the list, though, right? So why no text? I thought she was his “David”?
1:51

“Why did he want Candace back?” If Charlie actually wanted Candace back, why didn’t he text her to invite her back? There were 48 hours from the time he texted that PRIVATE text in the group chat to the time he was assassinated…if he was so sure, why didn’t he text her? And if—as she claims—he wanted her back because she’d warned him about all these people, then why didn’t he text her the night before when he was so afraid he was going to be killed? Wouldn’t she be the first person he’d text? Definitely on the list, though, right? So why no text? I thought she was his “David”?

Natalie Jean Beisner

12,033 views • 3 months ago

Erika told Jesse Watters that Charlie was excited the night before. I’m not buying her story. She could have easily just said he went to sleep & not mention where he slept. People would have assumed he slept in his bed. Did Charlie text someone the night before to tell them what was going on & how he wasn’t sleeping in his own bed? Is that why Erika HAD to share that he slept in GG’s room? I think someone besides Erika knows exactly what happened the night before. And so that Erika doesn’t look like she was hiding something, she had to share the fact that Charlie slept in his daughter’s room but paint it as though she just wanted him to get a good night’s sleep. I think in actuality he was stressed, tired & probably being loud, so much so that he woke up GG. Also, I can’t imagine a toddler’s room being more comfortable than my own bed. Additionally I noticed that Erika does that whisper thing in this clip. We were first introduced to the annoying whisper when she did her “battle cry” speech. Sometimes when people have changes in their voice such as a whisper, it can be a sign of emotional distress or even DECEPTION. Not saying for certain that is what was going on there but worth mentioning. None of what I’m sharing here means that she was involved directly in Charlie’s demise. However, she clearly has been deceptive in several ways and it makes her look very bad. Why is she like this? Who else did Charlie text the night before to tell them what was really going on? His sister? His parents? JD? Tucker? There are more text messages that we don’t know about because people are choosing to remain silent about them. WHY? Candace Owens
3:01

Erika told Jesse Watters that Charlie was excited the night before. I’m not buying her story. She could have easily just said he went to sleep & not mention where he slept. People would have assumed he slept in his bed. Did Charlie text someone the night before to tell them what was going on & how he wasn’t sleeping in his own bed? Is that why Erika HAD to share that he slept in GG’s room? I think someone besides Erika knows exactly what happened the night before. And so that Erika doesn’t look like she was hiding something, she had to share the fact that Charlie slept in his daughter’s room but paint it as though she just wanted him to get a good night’s sleep. I think in actuality he was stressed, tired & probably being loud, so much so that he woke up GG. Also, I can’t imagine a toddler’s room being more comfortable than my own bed. Additionally I noticed that Erika does that whisper thing in this clip. We were first introduced to the annoying whisper when she did her “battle cry” speech. Sometimes when people have changes in their voice such as a whisper, it can be a sign of emotional distress or even DECEPTION. Not saying for certain that is what was going on there but worth mentioning. None of what I’m sharing here means that she was involved directly in Charlie’s demise. However, she clearly has been deceptive in several ways and it makes her look very bad. Why is she like this? Who else did Charlie text the night before to tell them what was really going on? His sister? His parents? JD? Tucker? There are more text messages that we don’t know about because people are choosing to remain silent about them. WHY? Candace Owens

Belle

18,553 views • 5 days ago

YIKES 😬 Candace Owens says Brian Harpole’s lawyers reached out to her looking for Ian Carroll’s address. Will she throw him under the bus like she did to Blake Bednarz? She denies that he works for her. She says she doesn’t know where he lives and is confused about what he has to do with anything. Just taking a wild guess here… But could it be because he’s been all over the internet spreading the same stuff that Candace has been? I guess it’s not that confusing after all when you really think about it.
0:37

YIKES 😬 Candace Owens says Brian Harpole’s lawyers reached out to her looking for Ian Carroll’s address. Will she throw him under the bus like she did to Blake Bednarz? She denies that he works for her. She says she doesn’t know where he lives and is confused about what he has to do with anything. Just taking a wild guess here… But could it be because he’s been all over the internet spreading the same stuff that Candace has been? I guess it’s not that confusing after all when you really think about it.

Cinema Shogun

20,985 views • 4 months ago

Candace Owens shared texts where Charlie Kirk said he wanted to bring her back. They were screenshots of a private group chat that she said someone in the government gave them to her. Now we know, it was Joe Kent. This makes Candace, Tucker Carlson and Megyn Kelly look that much more suspicious.
1:20

Candace Owens shared texts where Charlie Kirk said he wanted to bring her back. They were screenshots of a private group chat that she said someone in the government gave them to her. Now we know, it was Joe Kent. This makes Candace, Tucker Carlson and Megyn Kelly look that much more suspicious.

OutspokenSamantha

224,298 views • 5 months ago

So Candace Owens is a bald-faced liar. I know you already knew that, but it’s important to point it out for her cultists. They always ask, “What did she lie about?” Now you’ll be able to show them these clips and prove she’s contradicting herself. Candace Owens loves using weasel words and slippery language. She does this to hedge her bets against lawsuits and to give herself plausible deniability when the fables she weaves inevitably contradict themselves. Here she is claiming she never said that the donors in Aspen heard Charlie Kirk say he wanted Erika Kirk to take over if anything happened to him. There’s only one problem with your statement, Candace: You said exactly that several months ago, and you yourself conceded that you believed the donor who heard Charlie Kirk say he wanted Erika to take over if anything happened to him. Oh sure, your cultists will act like that’s not exactly what you said in this second clip I’m providing, but it’s painfully obvious that’s precisely what you meant. You are a fraud, and as your lies continue to catch up to you, we will keep exposing them. Read ’em and weep.
0:37

So Candace Owens is a bald-faced liar. I know you already knew that, but it’s important to point it out for her cultists. They always ask, “What did she lie about?” Now you’ll be able to show them these clips and prove she’s contradicting herself. Candace Owens loves using weasel words and slippery language. She does this to hedge her bets against lawsuits and to give herself plausible deniability when the fables she weaves inevitably contradict themselves. Here she is claiming she never said that the donors in Aspen heard Charlie Kirk say he wanted Erika Kirk to take over if anything happened to him. There’s only one problem with your statement, Candace: You said exactly that several months ago, and you yourself conceded that you believed the donor who heard Charlie Kirk say he wanted Erika to take over if anything happened to him. Oh sure, your cultists will act like that’s not exactly what you said in this second clip I’m providing, but it’s painfully obvious that’s precisely what you meant. You are a fraud, and as your lies continue to catch up to you, we will keep exposing them. Read ’em and weep.

Jordan S90

18,949 views • 4 months ago