Thanks for your support Oz Pearlman!

@OzTheMentalist @Dan_Farah @HarperCollins @WmMorrowBooks Excellent book!

@OzTheMentalist @Dan_Farah @HarperCollins @WmMorrowBooks I got the Audible version, it has an appendix we can download It was so great-I couldn’t stop either.. I loved Jay’s voice too Very chill & easy to listen to Guess I wasn’t expecting that either

@OzTheMentalist @Dan_Farah @HarperCollins @WmMorrowBooks The book is so well written that even politics and aspects of navigating bureaucracy felt intriguing, let alone the deep extraordinary detailed real alien stories that gave me an urge to devour all chapters. Takes courage to expose all this for a guy in your position. Thank you !

@OzTheMentalist @Dan_Farah @HarperCollins @WmMorrowBooks Cf course he'd like it. The guy has got to be a hybrid alien! I'm only half kidding about that. But, more seriously, Oz is a brilliant performer. The best in the world at what he does, bar none.

@OzTheMentalist @Dan_Farah @HarperCollins @WmMorrowBooks Bringn it to pops tomorrow

@OzTheMentalist @Dan_Farah @HarperCollins @WmMorrowBooks Got my copy yesterday as well

@OzTheMentalist @Dan_Farah @HarperCollins @WmMorrowBooks @PatrickQJackson has the best explanation for what the orbs are, why they follow you home, what the poltergeist activity actually is, what they are actually doing around the planet.

cc: @Phenomenation Just keeping you apprised of the alien activity going on over here in the Heartland… This is how manifold orbs have been flying around at ultra-low elevations with impunity just in case you haven’t been informed. Be sure to read the exchange and watch the video in this post that was being questioned because this is what triggered 🔺👽THEIR👽🔺 timely and visually cogent response from last night:👇🏾

@OzTheMentalist @Dan_Farah @HarperCollins @WmMorrowBooks This book offers nothing new for the seasoned UFO buff. It just confirms what we already know from other sources.

@OzTheMentalist @Dan_Farah @HarperCollins @WmMorrowBooks Got my copy into the UK today too

@OzTheMentalist @Dan_Farah @HarperCollins @WmMorrowBooks just finished today, its all very convincing except the hitchhikers and sw ranch stuff. I know you guys have to know that stuff is detrimental to the story, so im reassured only by the fact you say it anyway.

@OzTheMentalist @Dan_Farah @HarperCollins @WmMorrowBooks Cannot buy it in England

Mo we need to integrate this into the Kindle book and the review of Jay Stratton’s book. Full Chat Transcript Topic: Richard Feynman-style executive summary (for Caltech students) of Jack Sarfatti’s paper on electroweak lepton dynamics with a fully dynamical SO(2,4) connection and condensate-induced Proca masses. User Have Richard Feynman make an executive summary of this pdf for his Cal Tech students Assistant (as Feynman) Executive Summary for Caltech Students by Richard Feynman (as requested) All right, listen up. This paper by Jack Sarfatti is an attempt to rewrite the electroweak sector for leptons by promoting the ordinary partial derivative to a full local gauge covariant derivative valued in the 15-dimensional conformal algebra 𝔰𝔬(2,4). Every generator—Lorentz, translations (the tetrad ea), special conformal (ka), and dilatation (b)—is kept as a dynamical field, sitting alongside the usual SU(2)L × U(1)Y potentials. Indices are raised and lowered with the tetrad metric rather than flat Minkowski space. A virtual electron–positron spin-triplet condensate is then invoked to give Proca masses to the extra conformal fields through some effective coupling G*. In the infinite-mass (or zero-condensate) limit, the extra fields freeze out and the system is claimed to reduce to ordinary electroweak theory plus Einstein–Cartan gravity. At finite mass, inside a coherent condensate, it predicts short-range axial-vector corrections and spin-dependent forces that can be “switched off” by destroying the condensate coherence. That’s the idea. Now let’s be clear about what this is and isn’t. The Standard Model electroweak Lagrangian for leptons is extremely well tested. The Dirac equations, the Yang–Mills equations for W and B, the Higgs equation, and the resulting massive W±, Z, photon, and charged leptons after spontaneous symmetry breaking are all in excellent agreement with experiment. Anything that modifies the covariant derivative by adding fifteen extra dynamical fields is, by construction, a radical extension. The paper writes down the formal Euler–Lagrange equations that result from this replacement, keeps all the non-Abelian cross terms that come from the 𝔰𝔬(2,4) structure constants, and adds the Proca mass terms by hand via the condensate. Mathematically, the system is closed if you accept the starting assumptions. The physical content is another matter. The Proca masses are not derived from a controlled microscopic calculation; they are postulated to arise from a virtual e+e− spin-triplet condensate with a coupling G* given in MKS units. The condensate is also supposed to back-react on itself through a gap equation. This is an effective, mean-field picture, not a demonstration that such a condensate forms, is stable, or has the required properties at laboratory densities. The infinite-mass recovery of the Standard Model is reassuring (any extension should do that), but the finite-mass regime predicts new short-range forces and axial-vector effects that have not been observed. The paper correctly notes that the absence of such switchable signals would rule the extension out—which is the right attitude, but also means the theory is currently unconstrained by data in the regime where it is new. From the standpoint of what we actually know: gravity is described by Einstein’s theory (or Einstein–Cartan if one insists on torsion), and the electroweak interactions are described by the Glashow–Weinberg–Salam model. Conformal gauging of the sort contemplated here is an old idea that has been explored by many people; making all fifteen fields dynamical and giving some of them condensate-induced masses is a particular speculative implementation. No experimental evidence currently requires or supports the extra fields remaining light and active in ordinary matter. Bottom line for students: The paper is a systematic (if formal) exercise in writing the coupled equations that follow once every derivative is replaced by the full SO(2,4) connection and Proca masses are inserted by hand. It is not a derivation of new physics from known principles, nor does it contain a calculation that has been confronted with data. If you want to understand how the Standard Model actually works, stick to the ordinary electroweak Lagrangian and its well-tested consequences. If you want to explore whether conformal or higher-spin connections can produce interesting low-energy effects under special conditions, the equations here give you an explicit starting point—but treat the condensate mechanism and the finite-mass predictions as hypotheses that still need experimental support, not as established results. That’s the situation. Nature has a habit of being simpler than our more elaborate constructions until the data force us to complicate them. So far, they haven’t. User continue Assistant (as Feynman) Continuation — Feynman to the students All right, let’s go a little further into the guts of this thing so you can see exactly where the standard theory ends and the speculation begins. In the ordinary electroweak theory the covariant derivative on a left-handed lepton doublet is simply Dμ L = (∂μ − i g (τa/2) Wμa − i g′ (Y/2) Bμ) L. Sarfatti replaces every ∂μ by the full 𝔰𝔬(2,4) exterior covariant derivative. On a Dirac spinor that means 𝒟μ ψ = ∂μ ψ + ωμab Mab ψ + eμa Pa ψ + kμa Ka ψ + bμ D ψ + AμEW ψ, where the so(2,4) generators are realized as Dirac 4x4 gamma matrices Mab = (i/4)[γa, γb],    Pa = (i/2) γa (1 − γ5),    Ka = −(i/2) γa (1 + γ5),    D = (i/2) γ5. So the translation generator Pa is purely left-chiral and the special-conformal generator Ka is purely right-chiral. That is a concrete, calculable statement: every time an electron couples to the dynamical tetrad or to the special-conformal field it picks up an axial-vector piece proportional to γμ γ5. Those pieces are absent in the Standard Model. They are also absent in ordinary Einstein–Cartan theory (which only gauges the Poincaré subgroup). They appear here only because the full conformal algebra has been gauged and kept dynamical. Now look at the mass terms. The Lagrangian is supplemented by ℒProca = −(1/2) me2 eaμ eaμ − (1/2) mk2 kaμ kaμ − (1/2) mb2 bμ bμ, with mI2 ∼ (G*/c3) ⟨ē σ e⟩triplet. The condensate ⟨ē σ e⟩ is not derived; it is inserted by hand. G* is given a dimensionful expression in MKS units, but no microscopic calculation shows that a macroscopic, coherent spin-triplet condensate of virtual pairs actually forms in ordinary matter, nor what its density would be. Once the masses are finite, the extra fields are massive vector fields with a finite penetration depth λI = h/mIc Outside the condensate region they die exponentially; inside it they are supposed to remain active and produce short-range spin-dependent forces and additional axial couplings. That is a sharp, in-principle falsifiable claim: if you can prepare a macroscopic coherent condensate and you do not see the predicted axial-vector corrections to lepton propagation or to spin-dependent forces, the finite-mass regime is ruled out. In the opposite limit—send me, mk, mb → ∞ or simply set the condensate density to zero—the only consistent solution is that the extra fields freeze: ea → δμa (or pure gauge), ka → 0, b → 0. All the cross terms that involve them vanish, the Lorentz connection equation collapses to the torsion-free Einstein–Cartan equation, and the electroweak equations return exactly to the ordinary Yang–Mills equations sourced by the usual lepton and Higgs currents. That reduction works formally. It is the minimum requirement any extension must satisfy; it does not by itself constitute evidence for the extension. A few further points that matter if you are going to think about this seriously: The theory is classical. There is no consistent quantization, no power-counting renormalizability argument, and no demonstration that the extra massive modes do not reintroduce the usual problems of higher-spin or conformal gauge theories (ghosts, unitarity, etc.). The self-consistent gap equation that makes the condensate density depend on the axial pieces of the connection is a mean-field assumption, not a derived result. It closes the system only inside that approximation. All indices are raised and lowered with the dynamical tetrad metric. That is correct for a gauge theory of the conformal group, but it means every term in the stress-energy tensor, every contraction in the curvature, and every current acquires additional pieces that are absent when the metric is fixed to be Minkowski. So the formal skeleton is there: you can write every Euler–Lagrange equation with every structure-constant cross term explicit. What is not there is a controlled derivation of the condensate, a demonstration that the finite-mass regime is stable, or any experimental signal that requires the extra fields to be light. Until one of those appears, the construction remains an interesting mathematical extension whose new physical content is still optional. Later Continuations (key equations with rendered symbols) Fully indexed tetrad equation (representative form): ∂ν Fνμa + ωνbc (ηac Fνμb − ηab Fνμc) + eνb (2 ηab Fνμ(D) − Fνμab) + kνb (2 ηab Fνμ(D) + Fνμab) + bν Fνμa+ … + me2 [⟨ē σ e⟩triplet] eμa = RHS current. Corrected dimensional formula for the coupling: G*/c3 ∼ (e/m)2 ε01/2 μ03/2. Higgs kinetic term with dynamical tetrad metric: (Dμ Φ)† (Dμ Φ) = gμν(e) (∂μ + Aμ)(∂ν + Aν) Φ, where gμν(e) = eμa eνb ηab and A contains all fifteen conformal potentials plus the electroweak potentials. The conversation continues through the stress-energy contributions, the gap equation, screening lengths λI = 1/mI, the infinite-mass reduction, and the final assessment that the classical system is consistent in the heavy-mass limit while the finite-mass regime remains an optional, switchable extension whose magnitude is controlled by an undetermined condensate density. End of transcript. All mathematical expressions use standard symbols rather than raw LaTeX source.

@OzTheMentalist @Dan_Farah @HarperCollins @WmMorrowBooks crazy isn't the word I would use. especially since you are a father with children.

@OzTheMentalist @Dan_Farah @HarperCollins @WmMorrowBooks How about some of that Zero Point Energy tech. Do you know anything g about MH370

@OzTheMentalist @Dan_Farah @HarperCollins @WmMorrowBooks and you will eventually put the full audio book on YouTube for free. @jaystratton

@OzTheMentalist @Dan_Farah @HarperCollins @WmMorrowBooks

@OzTheMentalist @Dan_Farah @HarperCollins @WmMorrowBooks I had the same question. How did this pass,printed and shared with the public/media. I AI’d the question. “Pretty much” answered the question. The answer seemed logical, at the same time it opens other questions. If this is not Classified, what are they never going to tell us.

@OzTheMentalist @Dan_Farah @HarperCollins @WmMorrowBooks The community of kindred spirits flows around life like a cloud. It lies beyond the dawn of thought, even before consciousness dreams

The orbs and triangles are us. PHARRIS Williams 5D Gravity Theory, Kaluza-Klien, Scalar physics and Tom Bearden, Puharich. Truth has been out there and HAL PUTOFF is tbe GODFATHER. GROUND STATE OF THE HYDROGEN ATOM 1989 I S THE KEY 🔑 👌 🙌 they destroyed Pons and Fleischmann

@OzTheMentalist @Dan_Farah @HarperCollins @WmMorrowBooks @jaystratton Brazilian Air Force Operation Saucer 1977: Transmedia UAPs! Luminous UFOs that descended from the sky to dive into the sea waters of Baia do Sol city of Mosqueiro, Pará, Brazil! UFOs that came out of the waters of the sea and conquered the sky!

@OzTheMentalist @Dan_Farah @HarperCollins @WmMorrowBooks Is Oz a Hybrid I think he is

@OzTheMentalist @Dan_Farah @HarperCollins @WmMorrowBooks Workers know a work!