Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

Thanks to AI coding, a complex learning process is now much simpler. I filtered the top 7% YTD stocks from 2000–2026 (including delisted ones), get 1400+ stocks, and visualized them with TradingView Lightweight Charts, featuring auto-marked highs/lows and direct period displays. Browse by year or symbol, even delisted stocks... show more

Will Hu

5,879 subscribers

108,893 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Qullamaggie on To Make a Lot of Money, You Need to be in the Best Stocks “LVGO and FSLY are the two best stocks right now. I’m long those; this is why you focus on momentum leaders. You’re not going to get any big moves in this. Random stocks like ZNGA—someone mentioned it yesterday— and this GLUE and stuff like that. These are some random stocks that are just having breakouts. You need to focus on the momentum leaders that you really need to be in. If you want to make a lot of money, you need to be in the best stocks. You can’t trade these random pieces of sh*t stocks that you guys trade, or a lot of you, I know.”

Qullamaggie on To Make a Lot of Money, You Need to be in the Best Stocks “LVGO and FSLY are the two best stocks right now. I’m long those; this is why you focus on momentum leaders. You’re not going to get any big moves in this. Random stocks like ZNGA—someone mentioned it yesterday— and this GLUE and stuff like that. These are some random stocks that are just having breakouts. You need to focus on the momentum leaders that you really need to be in. If you want to make a lot of money, you need to be in the best stocks. You can’t trade these random pieces of sh*t stocks that you guys trade, or a lot of you, I know.”

Lone

15,828 views • 7 months ago

Here's my full TBPN interview from yesterday, where I explain why AI chip stocks are going to soar over the next 6–9 months due to the imminent RSI advances from OpenAI and Anthropic. RSI will drive a dramatic increase in AI model capabilities, which will consume exponentially more compute. Much of the recent FUD handwringing is misplaced, just like DeepSeek last year, especially when we're about to go vertical from RSI. Note: I was last on TBPN on March 30th, where I pitched CPU and HBM memory stocks on the agentic AI megatrend. They more than doubled in the months that followed.

Here's my full TBPN interview from yesterday, where I explain why AI chip stocks are going to soar over the next 6–9 months due to the imminent RSI advances from OpenAI and Anthropic. RSI will drive a dramatic increase in AI model capabilities, which will consume exponentially more compute. Much of the recent FUD handwringing is misplaced, just like DeepSeek last year, especially when we're about to go vertical from RSI. Note: I was last on TBPN on March 30th, where I pitched CPU and HBM memory stocks on the agentic AI megatrend. They more than doubled in the months that followed.

tae kim

47,184 views • 1 month ago

You don’t need to be a concentrated investor to achieve triple-digit returns like Qullamaggie. This is how Qullamaggie diversifies his account. “I compare myself more to Dan Zanger. Dan Zanger made a fortune in the late 90s, turning about $112,000 into 42 million in a year and a half or two years, but he traded far more aggressively than I do—much more concentrated. He could be full margin in four or five stocks, or even three. That’s not how I trade. I wouldn’t be able to sleep. I’m a more diversified trader with 26 stocks in my portfolio; I can’t trade that concentrated. Some people can do it successfully, but the volatility would be too much for me. There are so many setups that I want to be in everything; I want to have a little bit of everything. I’m long weed names, crypto stocks, lithium stocks, battery stocks; I’m long stocks with no revenue and profitable stocks; I’m long frauds and real companies; I’m long fuel-cell stocks, Chinese solar stocks, oil ETFs, department stores, and some of the hottest ETFs out there—Chinese EVs, Tesla, IDEX. I don’t even know what half of these names are.”

You don’t need to be a concentrated investor to achieve triple-digit returns like Qullamaggie. This is how Qullamaggie diversifies his account. “I compare myself more to Dan Zanger. Dan Zanger made a fortune in the late 90s, turning about $112,000 into 42 million in a year and a half or two years, but he traded far more aggressively than I do—much more concentrated. He could be full margin in four or five stocks, or even three. That’s not how I trade. I wouldn’t be able to sleep. I’m a more diversified trader with 26 stocks in my portfolio; I can’t trade that concentrated. Some people can do it successfully, but the volatility would be too much for me. There are so many setups that I want to be in everything; I want to have a little bit of everything. I’m long weed names, crypto stocks, lithium stocks, battery stocks; I’m long stocks with no revenue and profitable stocks; I’m long frauds and real companies; I’m long fuel-cell stocks, Chinese solar stocks, oil ETFs, department stores, and some of the hottest ETFs out there—Chinese EVs, Tesla, IDEX. I don’t even know what half of these names are.”

Will Hu

41,346 views • 9 months ago

After many requests, here is my full stock scanning and daily process to swing trade momentum breakouts. I've been swing trading momentum stocks and averaged 100%+ returns per year, with $1 - Avg $ volume past 20 days is 20MM min - 8 >20>50 EMAs - Close above 20 EMA - Close > previous day high - CML indicator GREEN I just inverted these for shorts, and the same for ETFs long and short. My universe is US stocks + American depositary receipts. Once I get my scanning going, all I do is identify stocks breaking out according to my rules. I manually go through the scan results (shown in the video), identify potential setups, bring them onto TradingView, and decide if I want to enter. If you want to know more about my setup and how I swing trade momentum breakouts long and short to play with this scanning process, make sure to read my latest explanation in the tweet below. Once I identify with a manual review a setup that meets my criteria, I load it into TWS, make sure my position sizing is in check to risk 1% per trade from entry to stop, and enter. After 4:00 pm EST, the markets are closed, and I enter my stops and my BE alarms. That's it. I close my computer and come back the next day, and repeat the process, every day, every week, every month, every year. If you are NOT doing the same thing over and over in your process, you are doing random stuff. As you see, scanning is NOT the answer to a profitable strategy. Scanning is a process that derives directly from your EDGE. Not the other way around. Once you know what your edge is with extreme detail, you know how to find the stocks you want. Remember. Setup > Process > Scans. Everything starts with your EDGE 📈

After many requests, here is my full stock scanning and daily process to swing trade momentum breakouts. I've been swing trading momentum stocks and averaged 100%+ returns per year, with $1 - Avg $ volume past 20 days is 20MM min - 8 >20>50 EMAs - Close above 20 EMA - Close > previous day high - CML indicator GREEN I just inverted these for shorts, and the same for ETFs long and short. My universe is US stocks + American depositary receipts. Once I get my scanning going, all I do is identify stocks breaking out according to my rules. I manually go through the scan results (shown in the video), identify potential setups, bring them onto TradingView, and decide if I want to enter. If you want to know more about my setup and how I swing trade momentum breakouts long and short to play with this scanning process, make sure to read my latest explanation in the tweet below. Once I identify with a manual review a setup that meets my criteria, I load it into TWS, make sure my position sizing is in check to risk 1% per trade from entry to stop, and enter. After 4:00 pm EST, the markets are closed, and I enter my stops and my BE alarms. That's it. I close my computer and come back the next day, and repeat the process, every day, every week, every month, every year. If you are NOT doing the same thing over and over in your process, you are doing random stuff. As you see, scanning is NOT the answer to a profitable strategy. Scanning is a process that derives directly from your EDGE. Not the other way around. Once you know what your edge is with extreme detail, you know how to find the stocks you want. Remember. Setup > Process > Scans. Everything starts with your EDGE 📈

Felipe Guirao

13,068 views • 10 months ago

🚨 THIS COULD BE THE WORST MONDAY OF 2026 FOR THE STOCK MARKET Markets are facing pressure from every direction. → The US–Iran peace deal is showing signs of falling apart. → Traders are now pricing in the possibility of Fed rate hikes in 2026. → Investors are rotating out of high-risk growth stocks as risk sentiment weakens. → AI stocks remain heavily overvalued as concerns over an AI bubble continue to grow. The Nasdaq, S&P 500, and NVIDIA could all open with red candles. If you hold any positions, read this carefully. When markets open this week, this won't be just another dip. Stocks will dump. Bonds will dump. Gold and Silver will dump. Bitcoin will collapse. Keep in mind: I called BTC at $16K and the top at $126K When I exit, you'll see it here first. Turn notifications on.

🚨 THIS COULD BE THE WORST MONDAY OF 2026 FOR THE STOCK MARKET Markets are facing pressure from every direction. → The US–Iran peace deal is showing signs of falling apart. → Traders are now pricing in the possibility of Fed rate hikes in 2026. → Investors are rotating out of high-risk growth stocks as risk sentiment weakens. → AI stocks remain heavily overvalued as concerns over an AI bubble continue to grow. The Nasdaq, S&P 500, and NVIDIA could all open with red candles. If you hold any positions, read this carefully. When markets open this week, this won't be just another dip. Stocks will dump. Bonds will dump. Gold and Silver will dump. Bitcoin will collapse. Keep in mind: I called BTC at $16K and the top at $126K When I exit, you'll see it here first. Turn notifications on.

winkle.

24,229 views • 2 months ago

Jensen Huang on "distillation" On his new interview with axios, he was asked this question "Should open source model companies be allowed to distill closed models" "Distillation—learning from AI, learning from other people, and learning from other sources of knowledge, is fundamental to intelligence. We are constantly learning from other people. I am learning from you through the questions you are asking, and you are learning from me. All day long, we are learning from one another. AI also has to learn from something. The original AI models, whether they were open or closed, were trained on previously created knowledge from the internet. Now, AI is generating more content than humans. In a few more years, the internet could be 99% AI-generated content, and that content will have been created by some form of AI. As a result, AI systems will constantly be distilling knowledge and intelligence from other AI systems. The fact that AI can learn is a good thing. We want AI systems to be intelligent because a smarter AI can also be a safer AI." ---- From "Axios" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)

Jensen Huang on "distillation" On his new interview with axios, he was asked this question "Should open source model companies be allowed to distill closed models" "Distillation—learning from AI, learning from other people, and learning from other sources of knowledge, is fundamental to intelligence. We are constantly learning from other people. I am learning from you through the questions you are asking, and you are learning from me. All day long, we are learning from one another. AI also has to learn from something. The original AI models, whether they were open or closed, were trained on previously created knowledge from the internet. Now, AI is generating more content than humans. In a few more years, the internet could be 99% AI-generated content, and that content will have been created by some form of AI. As a result, AI systems will constantly be distilling knowledge and intelligence from other AI systems. The fact that AI can learn is a good thing. We want AI systems to be intelligent because a smarter AI can also be a safer AI." ---- From "Axios" YouTube channel, (full video link in comment)

Rohan Paul

443,477 views • 1 month ago

Qullamaggie shows His Scans In-Depth “My scans? Sure. This is strongest scan. This scan scans specific watchlist I have for the strongest stocks - most of them are growth stocks. Then like EP, these are stocks that gap up seven and a half percent or are up at least seven and a half percent. Above yesterday’s highs and at least 15 million in dollar volume. Then I have my momentum watch list. It’s also a specific watch list I have. Pretty much scan stocks that are up today in that watch list. ETF scan. 30 million in dollar volume and 6% ADR. And then I have lower liquidity. Higher ADR, these are pretty much like stocks that are not very liquid but have a very high ADR. So you can take a smaller position and still make decent money because the stock is likely to make a bigger move. Those are my intra-day scans. Then I have my weekend and overnight scans. Also, which I use to build my watchlist. Pretty much, scan for the strongest stocks on every time frame. Like 1 month, 6 months, 3 months, 2 years, 1 and a half years, etcetera. They all look the same, like 60 million in dollar volume. 3.5 ADR and ranks among the 7% strongest, and they all look the same. The only difference is the time frame. Then I also scan for the biggest 5-day gainers: 60 million dollar volume and up 25% in the past 5 days. So those are pretty much my main scans, and I also scan for the biggest losers. One and two year time frames, just to find the beaten-down names that could make big moves.”

Qullamaggie shows His Scans In-Depth “My scans? Sure. This is strongest scan. This scan scans specific watchlist I have for the strongest stocks - most of them are growth stocks. Then like EP, these are stocks that gap up seven and a half percent or are up at least seven and a half percent. Above yesterday’s highs and at least 15 million in dollar volume. Then I have my momentum watch list. It’s also a specific watch list I have. Pretty much scan stocks that are up today in that watch list. ETF scan. 30 million in dollar volume and 6% ADR. And then I have lower liquidity. Higher ADR, these are pretty much like stocks that are not very liquid but have a very high ADR. So you can take a smaller position and still make decent money because the stock is likely to make a bigger move. Those are my intra-day scans. Then I have my weekend and overnight scans. Also, which I use to build my watchlist. Pretty much, scan for the strongest stocks on every time frame. Like 1 month, 6 months, 3 months, 2 years, 1 and a half years, etcetera. They all look the same, like 60 million in dollar volume. 3.5 ADR and ranks among the 7% strongest, and they all look the same. The only difference is the time frame. Then I also scan for the biggest 5-day gainers: 60 million dollar volume and up 25% in the past 5 days. So those are pretty much my main scans, and I also scan for the biggest losers. One and two year time frames, just to find the beaten-down names that could make big moves.”

Lone

26,870 views • 10 months ago

Here is my full daily routine and scan process I follow. I swing trade stocks, and do all of my work in the last 30 min of the trading day. That's how I manage to average 100%+ returns/year with -10% max DD, entering my trades EOD. If you don't have a daily routine/process you adhere to, it will be almost impossible to make money swing trading stocks in the long term. I have the same routine and scanning process I followed for the past 6 years without fail. That's how you build consistency in your own trading and your setup/system/strategy. If you don't have a solid process you repeat every single day, you would be doing random stuff. Random stuff = losing money. Here is how my day goes: --> 3:30pm EST - I get to my laptop (yes, ditched the 5 monitors for a single laptop), - open up my software (TC2000, TradingView, and TWS) - And begin scanning on my long, short, and ETF scans on TradingView (see video attached for scan details and layout ✅) --> 3:50pm EST By this time, I: - already know which stocks are giving my signals according to my system, - I sort them in TradingView by ADR %, - And prioritize if I have more than 5 signals (that's my max limit per day) --> 3:58pm EST - Now I pre-loaded my orders on TWS, - check my position size to have a 1% risk per trade in all positions, - and execute just before the close --> 4:01pm EST - Markets are closed, so I add my Stop Loss and BE alarm - close my computer, and come back tomorrow in the last 30 minutes before the close and repeat... As you see, once you have your system and process in place, you can execute your system flawlessly, and that's what brings consistency and growth to your account over days, weeks, months, and years of doing the same thing over and over again... Build your process, and execute every day and you will grow with your system 📈

Here is my full daily routine and scan process I follow. I swing trade stocks, and do all of my work in the last 30 min of the trading day. That's how I manage to average 100%+ returns/year with -10% max DD, entering my trades EOD. If you don't have a daily routine/process you adhere to, it will be almost impossible to make money swing trading stocks in the long term. I have the same routine and scanning process I followed for the past 6 years without fail. That's how you build consistency in your own trading and your setup/system/strategy. If you don't have a solid process you repeat every single day, you would be doing random stuff. Random stuff = losing money. Here is how my day goes: --> 3:30pm EST - I get to my laptop (yes, ditched the 5 monitors for a single laptop), - open up my software (TC2000, TradingView, and TWS) - And begin scanning on my long, short, and ETF scans on TradingView (see video attached for scan details and layout ✅) --> 3:50pm EST By this time, I: - already know which stocks are giving my signals according to my system, - I sort them in TradingView by ADR %, - And prioritize if I have more than 5 signals (that's my max limit per day) --> 3:58pm EST - Now I pre-loaded my orders on TWS, - check my position size to have a 1% risk per trade in all positions, - and execute just before the close --> 4:01pm EST - Markets are closed, so I add my Stop Loss and BE alarm - close my computer, and come back tomorrow in the last 30 minutes before the close and repeat... As you see, once you have your system and process in place, you can execute your system flawlessly, and that's what brings consistency and growth to your account over days, weeks, months, and years of doing the same thing over and over again... Build your process, and execute every day and you will grow with your system 📈

Felipe Guirao

30,972 views • 9 months ago

ELON: “I DON’T BUY STOCKS, I BUILD THINGS” “I don’t really buy stocks. I’m not like an investor, I don’t look for things to invest in. I just try to build things. And then there happens to be stock of the company that I built. I don’t think about whether I should invest in a company or not. I don’t have a portfolio or anything. I guess AI and robotics are going to be very important. So I suppose it would be AI and robotics, that aren’t related to me. I think Google is going to be pretty valuable in the future. They’ve laid the groundwork for immense value creation from an AI standpoint. And Nvidia is obvious at this point. There’s an argument that companies doing AI, robotics, and maybe space flight are going to be overwhelming.” Source: Nikhil Kamath

ELON: “I DON’T BUY STOCKS, I BUILD THINGS” “I don’t really buy stocks. I’m not like an investor, I don’t look for things to invest in. I just try to build things. And then there happens to be stock of the company that I built. I don’t think about whether I should invest in a company or not. I don’t have a portfolio or anything. I guess AI and robotics are going to be very important. So I suppose it would be AI and robotics, that aren’t related to me. I think Google is going to be pretty valuable in the future. They’ve laid the groundwork for immense value creation from an AI standpoint. And Nvidia is obvious at this point. There’s an argument that companies doing AI, robotics, and maybe space flight are going to be overwhelming.” Source: Nikhil Kamath

Mario Nawfal

324,098 views • 9 months ago

Qullamaggie on How Dan Zanger Turned 12k into 42 Million “Like I compare myself more to Dan Zanger. Dan Zanger made a fortune back in the 90s. In the late 90s he ran, I think, 12 thousand dollars into 42 Million in a year and a half or two years, but he traded more aggressively than I do. He was more concentrated; he could be like full marching in like four, five stocks or three stocks or something. That’s literally not how I trade; I wouldn’t be able to sleep. And you see I’m a little bit more diversified trader with 26 stocks in my portfolio. Like I can’t trade that concentrated. I know some do it successfully, but I just, the volatility you can have a lot of volatility; I just couldn’t do it. I just couldn’t do it. And there’s so many good setups. I like I wanna be in everything. I want to have a little bit of everything. Like I have so many different things. I’m long weed names; I’m long crypto stocks. I’m long lithium stocks; I’m long battery stocks. I’m long stocks with no revenue; I’m long profitable stocks. I’m long frauds; I’m long real companies. I’m long fuel cell stocks. I’m long Chinese solar stocks; oil ETFs, department stores. Some of the hottest ETFs out there; Chinese electrical vehicles. TSLA. IDEX -I don’t know what half of these names - I don’t even know what the hell they are. I’m short some software stock or whatever it is. I’m long a gold ETF; this one I don’t even know what the hell it is.”

Qullamaggie on How Dan Zanger Turned 12k into 42 Million “Like I compare myself more to Dan Zanger. Dan Zanger made a fortune back in the 90s. In the late 90s he ran, I think, 12 thousand dollars into 42 Million in a year and a half or two years, but he traded more aggressively than I do. He was more concentrated; he could be like full marching in like four, five stocks or three stocks or something. That’s literally not how I trade; I wouldn’t be able to sleep. And you see I’m a little bit more diversified trader with 26 stocks in my portfolio. Like I can’t trade that concentrated. I know some do it successfully, but I just, the volatility you can have a lot of volatility; I just couldn’t do it. I just couldn’t do it. And there’s so many good setups. I like I wanna be in everything. I want to have a little bit of everything. Like I have so many different things. I’m long weed names; I’m long crypto stocks. I’m long lithium stocks; I’m long battery stocks. I’m long stocks with no revenue; I’m long profitable stocks. I’m long frauds; I’m long real companies. I’m long fuel cell stocks. I’m long Chinese solar stocks; oil ETFs, department stores. Some of the hottest ETFs out there; Chinese electrical vehicles. TSLA. IDEX -I don’t know what half of these names - I don’t even know what the hell they are. I’m short some software stock or whatever it is. I’m long a gold ETF; this one I don’t even know what the hell it is.”

Lone

31,504 views • 7 months ago

All You Need Is Here —— 13 Qullamaggie's Stock and ETF Scans Intraday Scans "Which screen filters my scans? Sure. This is my 'Strongest' scan. These scans are for a specific watchlist I have of the strongest stocks—most of them are growth stocks. Then, like EPs, these are stocks that gap up 7.5% or are up at least 7.5% above yesterday's price, with at least $15 million in dollar volume. Then I have my Momentum watchlist. It’s also a specific watchlist where I pretty much scan for stocks that are up today in that watchlist above yesterday’s highs. This OTC scan... you don’t have to look at that, I’m gonna take it off. I don’t trade OTCs ever; they’ve been dead for many years. For my ETF scan, I look for $30 million in dollar volume and a 6% ADR (Average Daily Range). Then I have Lower Liquidity / Higher ADR scans. These are pretty much stocks that are not very liquid but have a very high ADR, so you can take a smaller position and still make decent money because the stock is likely to make a bigger move. So those are my intraday scans." Weekend & Overnight Scans "Then I have my weekend and overnight scans, which I use to build my watchlists. Pretty much, I scan for the strongest stocks on every timeframe—like one month, six months, three months, two years, one and a half years, etc. They all look the same: $60 million in dollar volume, 3.5% ADR, and ranked among the 7% strongest. The only difference is the timeframe. Then I also scan for the Biggest 5-Day Gainers: $60 million dollar volume and up 25% in the past five days. For ADRs (foreign stocks), you have to scan for them separately in TC2000: $60 million in dollar volume and 3% ADR. So those are pretty much my main scans. Then I also scan for our Biggest Losers on one and two-year timeframes just to find the beaten-down names that could make big moves."

All You Need Is Here —— 13 Qullamaggie's Stock and ETF Scans Intraday Scans "Which screen filters my scans? Sure. This is my 'Strongest' scan. These scans are for a specific watchlist I have of the strongest stocks—most of them are growth stocks. Then, like EPs, these are stocks that gap up 7.5% or are up at least 7.5% above yesterday's price, with at least $15 million in dollar volume. Then I have my Momentum watchlist. It’s also a specific watchlist where I pretty much scan for stocks that are up today in that watchlist above yesterday’s highs. This OTC scan... you don’t have to look at that, I’m gonna take it off. I don’t trade OTCs ever; they’ve been dead for many years. For my ETF scan, I look for $30 million in dollar volume and a 6% ADR (Average Daily Range). Then I have Lower Liquidity / Higher ADR scans. These are pretty much stocks that are not very liquid but have a very high ADR, so you can take a smaller position and still make decent money because the stock is likely to make a bigger move. So those are my intraday scans." Weekend & Overnight Scans "Then I have my weekend and overnight scans, which I use to build my watchlists. Pretty much, I scan for the strongest stocks on every timeframe—like one month, six months, three months, two years, one and a half years, etc. They all look the same: $60 million in dollar volume, 3.5% ADR, and ranked among the 7% strongest. The only difference is the timeframe. Then I also scan for the Biggest 5-Day Gainers: $60 million dollar volume and up 25% in the past five days. For ADRs (foreign stocks), you have to scan for them separately in TC2000: $60 million in dollar volume and 3% ADR. So those are pretty much my main scans. Then I also scan for our Biggest Losers on one and two-year timeframes just to find the beaten-down names that could make big moves."

Will Hu

17,836 views • 5 months ago

Henry on how nearly all market returns come from 1% of companies: "There's 4,000 public stocks. How many of them truly are great? Over a rolling 10 year period, you have about 40 stocks that compound wealth at 20% a year or go up ~6x. So about 1%. I read the shareholder letters and tried to understand what drove the success of the New Horizon Fund. It was really only 20 stocks over 50 years that drove the performance. Walmart first came public as a super small company. And this is definitely one of the 20 stocks that mattered. But, unfortunately, it was sold. I was managing about $8 billion, and had the stake in Walmart not been sold, it would have been greater than the sum total of everything that I was managing. I love small cap companies because I love the people side of the job, but I also love them because 80% of these great companies actually start as small caps."

Henry on how nearly all market returns come from 1% of companies: "There's 4,000 public stocks. How many of them truly are great? Over a rolling 10 year period, you have about 40 stocks that compound wealth at 20% a year or go up ~6x. So about 1%. I read the shareholder letters and tried to understand what drove the success of the New Horizon Fund. It was really only 20 stocks over 50 years that drove the performance. Walmart first came public as a super small company. And this is definitely one of the 20 stocks that mattered. But, unfortunately, it was sold. I was managing about $8 billion, and had the stake in Walmart not been sold, it would have been greater than the sum total of everything that I was managing. I love small cap companies because I love the people side of the job, but I also love them because 80% of these great companies actually start as small caps."

Patrick OShaughnessy

197,656 views • 8 months ago

Breadth is overrated. If you're trading the absolute best, leading stocks in the market, why does it matter what the thousands of other random stocks are doing? In bull markets, the best stocks can make monster moves for weeks/months on end while breadth inches lower and lower. And in bear markets (when breadth is bad), what good does it do to know where market breadth is if you're still going to only be trading the best of the best stocks based on the merit of the setups/stocks? It's just noise... Breadth was falling off a cliff in December 2024 as Quantum Computing stocks made some of the biggest speculative moves of this decade. Breadth diverged against the indexes and leading stocks for nearly 2 full years from mid-1998 to 2000, one of the best periods to trade of ALL TIME. Pundits and bears in the media would constantly harp on about how breadth was hitting 12-month lows while indexes continued going higher. Even Dan Zanger in Sept 1999 (a month before the NASDAQ exploded 50% higher in 2 months) expressed worry about the Accumulation/Distribution being "far more pronounced to the downside today than was 1929 and similar to 1987." However, he was right to say that "This in no way implies a crash, but does imply a high level of risk." And guess what he did? He deferred to setups on the leading stocks, and made one of the best audited performances of all time. “I at times wonder why I even look at breadth…it’s not needed if you just follow the process of the main strategy, it’ll do everything for you.” - Oliver Kell "If you throw every breadth indicator anyone's ever spoken about out the window, you're not gonna have any issues in my opinion." - Oliver Kell "I don’t look much at breadth, no, because some of the biggest winners...they’re gonna work anyways, some of the strongest sectors, they’re gonna work even if the breadth is low. Like usually what happens after market corrections is the first bounce, the breadth is insane like everything goes up, and for every leg higher (this is what we saw also this spring/summer) the breadth kinda deteriorates and deteriorates and fewer and fewer stocks and sectors going up. But our job is not to trade all of the stocks and sectors, our job is to trade the strongest stocks and sectors, so I don’t care what the breadth is. Or I do care, at some point it matters obviously, but you can just see doing your scanning which stocks are going up or not...breadth can also be very misleading..." - Kristjan Kullamägi 🇺🇦 If you're trading the top 10-50 stocks in the market, breadth most of the time IMO just adds noise to your process and takes attention away from more important things.

Breadth is overrated. If you're trading the absolute best, leading stocks in the market, why does it matter what the thousands of other random stocks are doing? In bull markets, the best stocks can make monster moves for weeks/months on end while breadth inches lower and lower. And in bear markets (when breadth is bad), what good does it do to know where market breadth is if you're still going to only be trading the best of the best stocks based on the merit of the setups/stocks? It's just noise... Breadth was falling off a cliff in December 2024 as Quantum Computing stocks made some of the biggest speculative moves of this decade. Breadth diverged against the indexes and leading stocks for nearly 2 full years from mid-1998 to 2000, one of the best periods to trade of ALL TIME. Pundits and bears in the media would constantly harp on about how breadth was hitting 12-month lows while indexes continued going higher. Even Dan Zanger in Sept 1999 (a month before the NASDAQ exploded 50% higher in 2 months) expressed worry about the Accumulation/Distribution being "far more pronounced to the downside today than was 1929 and similar to 1987." However, he was right to say that "This in no way implies a crash, but does imply a high level of risk." And guess what he did? He deferred to setups on the leading stocks, and made one of the best audited performances of all time. “I at times wonder why I even look at breadth…it’s not needed if you just follow the process of the main strategy, it’ll do everything for you.” - Oliver Kell "If you throw every breadth indicator anyone's ever spoken about out the window, you're not gonna have any issues in my opinion." - Oliver Kell "I don’t look much at breadth, no, because some of the biggest winners...they’re gonna work anyways, some of the strongest sectors, they’re gonna work even if the breadth is low. Like usually what happens after market corrections is the first bounce, the breadth is insane like everything goes up, and for every leg higher (this is what we saw also this spring/summer) the breadth kinda deteriorates and deteriorates and fewer and fewer stocks and sectors going up. But our job is not to trade all of the stocks and sectors, our job is to trade the strongest stocks and sectors, so I don’t care what the breadth is. Or I do care, at some point it matters obviously, but you can just see doing your scanning which stocks are going up or not...breadth can also be very misleading..." - Kristjan Kullamägi 🇺🇦 If you're trading the top 10-50 stocks in the market, breadth most of the time IMO just adds noise to your process and takes attention away from more important things.

Charlie M

32,209 views • 1 year ago

If you want to become a millionaire this year, do exactly what I say every day. Here's the market opportunities: 1. $DRAM, $MU, $SNDK, and other companies like $INTC, $AMD, $AMZN, etc. are forming potential bull flags (continuation for further upside if these lows can hold). 2. $IGV and software names like $NOW, $ADBE, $CRM, etc. will retest it's breakout to see if this is REAL conviction or a fake pump. Watch for the buyers, watch for the volume. 3. Stage 2 setups like $CIFR, $IREN, and others are on watch. All in all, I am a buyer of every dip in AI stocks. I am also BALANCED across AI + core defensive stocks heading into the summer. I expect the next few days to be relief (green). We'll see how the markets react and be buyers at key levels.

If you want to become a millionaire this year, do exactly what I say every day. Here's the market opportunities: 1. $DRAM, $MU, $SNDK, and other companies like $INTC, $AMD, $AMZN, etc. are forming potential bull flags (continuation for further upside if these lows can hold). 2. $IGV and software names like $NOW, $ADBE, $CRM, etc. will retest it's breakout to see if this is REAL conviction or a fake pump. Watch for the buyers, watch for the volume. 3. Stage 2 setups like $CIFR, $IREN, and others are on watch. All in all, I am a buyer of every dip in AI stocks. I am also BALANCED across AI + core defensive stocks heading into the summer. I expect the next few days to be relief (green). We'll see how the markets react and be buyers at key levels.

AskLivermore

195,158 views • 3 months ago

"I prefer to be either in a really hot sector or just in the growth names..." – Kristjan Kullamägi 🇺🇦 KQ puts a lot more emphasis on fundamentals, or the theme/story than many may think. Check out this clip where he talks more about it. "Even if you get a good setup on a random stock, it's probably not worth it. Especially if you can choose from like these growth stocks...like if you have plenty of growth stocks and then you have some random stocks, focus on the growth stocks, because earnings are fuel." – Kristjan Kullamägi 🇺🇦 "You need a reason for something to go up, stocks don't go up just because there's a certain pattern to it, ok? You find the stocks that have a reason to go up and then you look for patterns on those stocks, because patterns are just something that can increase your odds of success and maximize your risk/reward." – Kristjan Kullamägi 🇺🇦

"I prefer to be either in a really hot sector or just in the growth names..." – Kristjan Kullamägi 🇺🇦 KQ puts a lot more emphasis on fundamentals, or the theme/story than many may think. Check out this clip where he talks more about it. "Even if you get a good setup on a random stock, it's probably not worth it. Especially if you can choose from like these growth stocks...like if you have plenty of growth stocks and then you have some random stocks, focus on the growth stocks, because earnings are fuel." – Kristjan Kullamägi 🇺🇦 "You need a reason for something to go up, stocks don't go up just because there's a certain pattern to it, ok? You find the stocks that have a reason to go up and then you look for patterns on those stocks, because patterns are just something that can increase your odds of success and maximize your risk/reward." – Kristjan Kullamägi 🇺🇦

Charlie M

54,681 views • 2 years ago

i made a lot of money trading i don’t actually know how to trade let me explain for years it was just memecoins. spray and pray. ape in, get lucky, sometimes get wrecked that’s not a skill. that’s pretty much just gambling and paying attention and it worked because crypto was on easy mode that era is over now i want to trade real things. stocks. forex. equities. and i have no idea how. so this summer i’m actually learning. from zero. 70-90% of retail traders lose money. i refuse to stay in that group. documenting the whole thing. wins, losses, embarrassing mistakes comment “skill max” if you’re learning with me we start from zero. together.

i made a lot of money trading i don’t actually know how to trade let me explain for years it was just memecoins. spray and pray. ape in, get lucky, sometimes get wrecked that’s not a skill. that’s pretty much just gambling and paying attention and it worked because crypto was on easy mode that era is over now i want to trade real things. stocks. forex. equities. and i have no idea how. so this summer i’m actually learning. from zero. 70-90% of retail traders lose money. i refuse to stay in that group. documenting the whole thing. wins, losses, embarrassing mistakes comment “skill max” if you’re learning with me we start from zero. together.

Mika

77,365 views • 2 months ago

Qullamaggie on Track and Trade Stocks With Triple Digit EPS and Revenue Growth “This EXPI has triple-digit EPS and revenue, bro. It’s going straight up. This is what happens, guys. This is why you should keep track of all of these high-growth stocks with momentum, okay? They need to be in a watchlist. You need to keep track of this. This thing is up 1000% in like eight months or something. Another one is FUTU, okay? Another one, triple-digit EPS and revenue growth. Look at this thing; it’s up like what? Also, 1000% in like eight, nine months, ten months. If you’re looking for an edge, one place to start is tracking stocks that have triple-digit EPS and revenue growth. Just a hint. TIGR too, another one. China brokerage, yeah. Triple digit since March lows. This thing is up 600%. I mean, earnings are fuel, okay? I mean, you have these random pump stocks that can make big moves with no reason really other than, you know, chat rooms and forums are pumping these. But earnings that’s fuel, okay? It’s like rocket fuel—triple-digit EPS and revenue growth. It’s like rocket fuel; it gives stocks a reason to go up. One way to trade - you don’t even need to do any scans. Just build a watch list of the fifty or thirty fastest-growing stocks in the stock market, like everything just, you know everything. They don’t necessarily have to be like triple-digit EPS and revenue growth, but everything is that say fifty percent like mid-high double-digit EPS. Revenue growth or higher, keep them in a watch list. The top say 50 ones, and just look for setups on those stocks, and you’re gonna outperform the market by a wide margin. Year after year, you don’t need to do any scans at all. You just keep track of that one watchlist with fifty stocks and just look for good setups on those among those. That’s all you need to do to get a big edge. Now you’re not gonna outperform like every market rally because in some markets cyclicals lead or beaten down stocks lead. But if you only trade the fastest growing stocks, you probably gonna do very well year after year after year. No rocket science involved; you don’t need any fancy indicators. You don’t need someone on TV to tell you this or that because you already know what works in the stock market.”

Qullamaggie on Track and Trade Stocks With Triple Digit EPS and Revenue Growth “This EXPI has triple-digit EPS and revenue, bro. It’s going straight up. This is what happens, guys. This is why you should keep track of all of these high-growth stocks with momentum, okay? They need to be in a watchlist. You need to keep track of this. This thing is up 1000% in like eight months or something. Another one is FUTU, okay? Another one, triple-digit EPS and revenue growth. Look at this thing; it’s up like what? Also, 1000% in like eight, nine months, ten months. If you’re looking for an edge, one place to start is tracking stocks that have triple-digit EPS and revenue growth. Just a hint. TIGR too, another one. China brokerage, yeah. Triple digit since March lows. This thing is up 600%. I mean, earnings are fuel, okay? I mean, you have these random pump stocks that can make big moves with no reason really other than, you know, chat rooms and forums are pumping these. But earnings that’s fuel, okay? It’s like rocket fuel—triple-digit EPS and revenue growth. It’s like rocket fuel; it gives stocks a reason to go up. One way to trade - you don’t even need to do any scans. Just build a watch list of the fifty or thirty fastest-growing stocks in the stock market, like everything just, you know everything. They don’t necessarily have to be like triple-digit EPS and revenue growth, but everything is that say fifty percent like mid-high double-digit EPS. Revenue growth or higher, keep them in a watch list. The top say 50 ones, and just look for setups on those stocks, and you’re gonna outperform the market by a wide margin. Year after year, you don’t need to do any scans at all. You just keep track of that one watchlist with fifty stocks and just look for good setups on those among those. That’s all you need to do to get a big edge. Now you’re not gonna outperform like every market rally because in some markets cyclicals lead or beaten down stocks lead. But if you only trade the fastest growing stocks, you probably gonna do very well year after year after year. No rocket science involved; you don’t need any fancy indicators. You don’t need someone on TV to tell you this or that because you already know what works in the stock market.”

Lone

13,857 views • 6 months ago

spent some time testing realstocks on MEXC today and honestly the part i found most interesting wasn't the trading itself. it was finally seeing the difference between real stocks, tokenized stocks, and RWAs in action. a lot of people throw these terms around like they're the same thing, but they're really not. real stocks = actual shares held through licensed broker infrastructure. tokenized stocks = tokens designed to track the price of a stock. RWAs = on-chain representations of real-world assets that depend on the issuer and structure. and considering that US stocks are home to some of the biggest companies in the world, understanding what you're actually buying matters more than ever. so i decided to try the full flow myself. deposited usdt into my MEXC account, completed the verification for realstocks, then made my first trades on AAPL/USDT and TSLA/USDT directly from the platform. what surprised me most was how simple the process felt. >> no bank wires. >> no separate broker platform. >> no jumping between apps. just usdt → US stocks. it feels like we're watching crypto exchanges evolve into something much bigger than crypto exchanges. for years, getting exposure to US equities usually meant opening a traditional brokerage account, moving money through banks, and dealing with multiple platforms. now it's becoming possible to access crypto and US stocks from the same place. one login. one balance. crypto, stocks, and everything in between. i also recorded the entire process and put together a walkthrough below showing exactly how it works step by step, from funding with usdt to placing my AAPL and TSLA trades. and for anyone looking into it, there's currently a 0 platform fee launch window running until june 15.

spent some time testing realstocks on MEXC today and honestly the part i found most interesting wasn't the trading itself. it was finally seeing the difference between real stocks, tokenized stocks, and RWAs in action. a lot of people throw these terms around like they're the same thing, but they're really not. real stocks = actual shares held through licensed broker infrastructure. tokenized stocks = tokens designed to track the price of a stock. RWAs = on-chain representations of real-world assets that depend on the issuer and structure. and considering that US stocks are home to some of the biggest companies in the world, understanding what you're actually buying matters more than ever. so i decided to try the full flow myself. deposited usdt into my MEXC account, completed the verification for realstocks, then made my first trades on AAPL/USDT and TSLA/USDT directly from the platform. what surprised me most was how simple the process felt. >> no bank wires. >> no separate broker platform. >> no jumping between apps. just usdt → US stocks. it feels like we're watching crypto exchanges evolve into something much bigger than crypto exchanges. for years, getting exposure to US equities usually meant opening a traditional brokerage account, moving money through banks, and dealing with multiple platforms. now it's becoming possible to access crypto and US stocks from the same place. one login. one balance. crypto, stocks, and everything in between. i also recorded the entire process and put together a walkthrough below showing exactly how it works step by step, from funding with usdt to placing my AAPL and TSLA trades. and for anyone looking into it, there's currently a 0 platform fee launch window running until june 15.

c!tyboy💂🏾

10,798 views • 3 months ago

Qullamaggie on Nicolas Darvas and Going Full Margin on One Stock “Nicolas Darvas used to get 200% in a stock; his record is pretty good? Yeah, but for every Darvas, there’s like 1,000 people who bought the wrong stock and blew up. Your number one job as a trader is to not blow up, okay? And by you do that by risk management. I don’t like the people who, you know, that glorify going on margin in a single stock or in a few stocks. It’s just stupid; you will blow up guaranteed. You’re on 200% margin in a stock. You know it goes down 30% overnight, you have lost most of your money. It’s just not worth it. Like in a bull market. There are so many stocks that go up, okay? There’s no reason to be in margin in one or a few stocks. Just look at the moves from the March lows. There’s hundreds of stocks that have doubled tripled quadrupled. There was no reason to be in one single stock. It’s just ridiculous; it’s the dumbest thing ever. Why would you be in a few stocks? I just don’t get the point.”

Qullamaggie on Nicolas Darvas and Going Full Margin on One Stock “Nicolas Darvas used to get 200% in a stock; his record is pretty good? Yeah, but for every Darvas, there’s like 1,000 people who bought the wrong stock and blew up. Your number one job as a trader is to not blow up, okay? And by you do that by risk management. I don’t like the people who, you know, that glorify going on margin in a single stock or in a few stocks. It’s just stupid; you will blow up guaranteed. You’re on 200% margin in a stock. You know it goes down 30% overnight, you have lost most of your money. It’s just not worth it. Like in a bull market. There are so many stocks that go up, okay? There’s no reason to be in margin in one or a few stocks. Just look at the moves from the March lows. There’s hundreds of stocks that have doubled tripled quadrupled. There was no reason to be in one single stock. It’s just ridiculous; it’s the dumbest thing ever. Why would you be in a few stocks? I just don’t get the point.”

Lone

20,925 views • 7 months ago

How I Find Stocks WHEN Institutional Money Floods In (3 Signs) My strategy comes from my days as a hedge fund strategist—finding breakout stocks when institutional money pours in. Here's my exact system: I look for 3 tell-tale signs: 1. Look for consolidation patterns (sideways movement) 2. Wait for breakout above the 50-day moving average 3. Buy just above recent highs Remember: Don't start with individual stocks. That's overwhelming. I typically start with sectors. I find sectors showing the consolidation pattern (like homebuilders or biotech recovering from terrible years). Then I drill down to industries within those sectors. Finally, I pick the top 2-3 stocks in that industry and look for the same pattern. I call it the "heartbeat pattern": sideways consolidation, breaking above the 50-day MA, taking out recent highs. I set my buy order just above that point. When it triggers, I watch the volume. If it doubles, triples, or quadruples—that's institutional money flooding in. This is how I catch the sweet spot when the big money moves, not after. It takes me 2-3 hours per week, and it's been working for decades. — This is just a small snippet of the 25-minute interview. We also covered: • The exact volume pattern that signals institutional buying is happening NOW • How to automate your exits so emotions don't cost you 20-30% losses • Why "cheap" stocks are a trap—and what to buy instead Just comment “INTERVIEW’ and I’ll DM you the complete interview.

How I Find Stocks WHEN Institutional Money Floods In (3 Signs) My strategy comes from my days as a hedge fund strategist—finding breakout stocks when institutional money pours in. Here's my exact system: I look for 3 tell-tale signs: 1. Look for consolidation patterns (sideways movement) 2. Wait for breakout above the 50-day moving average 3. Buy just above recent highs Remember: Don't start with individual stocks. That's overwhelming. I typically start with sectors. I find sectors showing the consolidation pattern (like homebuilders or biotech recovering from terrible years). Then I drill down to industries within those sectors. Finally, I pick the top 2-3 stocks in that industry and look for the same pattern. I call it the "heartbeat pattern": sideways consolidation, breaking above the 50-day MA, taking out recent highs. I set my buy order just above that point. When it triggers, I watch the volume. If it doubles, triples, or quadruples—that's institutional money flooding in. This is how I catch the sweet spot when the big money moves, not after. It takes me 2-3 hours per week, and it's been working for decades. — This is just a small snippet of the 25-minute interview. We also covered: • The exact volume pattern that signals institutional buying is happening NOW • How to automate your exits so emotions don't cost you 20-30% losses • Why "cheap" stocks are a trap—and what to buy instead Just comment “INTERVIEW’ and I’ll DM you the complete interview.

Felix Prehn 🐶

41,074 views • 7 months ago