Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

Thanksgiving Horror. What’s REALLY in Campbell’s Soup? 😱 GMO Nuggets, Exec Meltdown and Social Media Apocalypse. Cream of Mushroom Soup sees a HUGE jump, with about 40% of yearly sales happening right now —during Thanksgiving for cherished recipes like Green Bean Casserole. But still…that GMO bombshell. So I stared...

ToscaAusten's profile picture

Tosca Austen

138,941 subscribers

109,102 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад •via X (Twitter)

ЕдаЗдоровье и велнес
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

🚨 YOU’RE EATING 3D PRINTED MEAT AND DON’T EVEN KNOW IT A viral TikTok is blowing up after a creator shows off a 3D printed “steak” from Redefine Meat and the footage is freaking people out. He holds it up and says: “It’s meaty and fibrous just like real meat… but 100% vegan.” “It looks meaty… it smells meaty… it’s got layers of protein and fat just like meat.” “I’m not gonna lie - it smells disgusting.” “Does it taste like meat? That is VERY, VERY meaty.” He loads it into tacos, takes a bite, and says it has the same umami punch you get from real meat. All while the internet is STILL reacting to the Campbell’s executive caught on hot mic claiming: “There’s bio-engineered meat in the soup!” “I don’t wanna eat a fu*king piece of chicken that came from a fu*king 3D printer!” Now people are connecting dots they never expected to connect. Because if 3D printed meat already looks, smells, and tastes like meat…how much of this stuff is already in the food supply without anyone realizing it? Does this make you curious…or straight-up terrified about what we’re REALLY eating?
1:15

🚨 YOU’RE EATING 3D PRINTED MEAT AND DON’T EVEN KNOW IT A viral TikTok is blowing up after a creator shows off a 3D printed “steak” from Redefine Meat and the footage is freaking people out. He holds it up and says: “It’s meaty and fibrous just like real meat… but 100% vegan.” “It looks meaty… it smells meaty… it’s got layers of protein and fat just like meat.” “I’m not gonna lie - it smells disgusting.” “Does it taste like meat? That is VERY, VERY meaty.” He loads it into tacos, takes a bite, and says it has the same umami punch you get from real meat. All while the internet is STILL reacting to the Campbell’s executive caught on hot mic claiming: “There’s bio-engineered meat in the soup!” “I don’t wanna eat a fu*king piece of chicken that came from a fu*king 3D printer!” Now people are connecting dots they never expected to connect. Because if 3D printed meat already looks, smells, and tastes like meat…how much of this stuff is already in the food supply without anyone realizing it? Does this make you curious…or straight-up terrified about what we’re REALLY eating?

HustleBitch

1,716,433 просмотров • 10 месяцев назад

American Rancher Warning America About What’s Being Threatened By The USDA & ESG Carbon Regulations - Big Agricultural Will Force All Smaller Farms Out - CEO for Rabobank said if you can't afford carbon offsets, you should not be allowed to fly. The only people that should be allowed to fly are those that can afford carbon offsets - Cameras To Monitor Citizens On How Far You Drive - They Will Control What You Eat & What Your Kids Eat In Schools - ADM and Tyson right now are in the middle of building $500 million dollar plants where they are going to grow insects for human consumption, all in the name of climate change - Digital Tracking Tags On Cattle - They want your land - & Much more all in the name of Climate Change “Agriculture cannot go along with this carbon deal. You cannot agree to have your carbon emissions measured in any way because what they want, like I read out of that Tyson Foods ESG report, what they want is your supplier data and a standardized way of calculating it. Because what do you think the next step is? They're going to want you to reduce it and reduce it and reduce it. It's $3,000,000,000 that the USDA took with no oversight. What they wanna do with it is build a system that measures your carbon emissions. They're kinda giving away what the problem is there. The problem is you and your carbon emissions. And all the bigwigs in agriculture have pretty much signed on to this deal and that narrative, that carbon emissions are this huge problem. But they also want to control how far you can travel. And they've actually tried to regulate this in different places in Europe where they put up cameras that monitor their citizens that make sure they're not traveling too far around the city or even driving older cars and things like that. And the citizens have cut the cameras down. The CEO for Rabobank had said if you can't afford carbon offsets, you should not be allowed to fly. The only people that should be allowed to fly are those that can afford carbon offsets. And if you're too poor to fly and you want to travel, you should put on a virtual reality headset, and that's how you can see the world. They also want to control what you eat. And the New York City schools right now, they have taken meat off the menu for at least 2 days of the week. And the New York City mayor has said that he is working on a plan where he will limit residents' ability to consume meat. And then you have also, you know, ADM and Tyson right now are in the middle of building $500,000,000 plants where they are going to grow insects for human consumption, all in the name of climate change. And they want your land. Biden's, uh, 30 by 30 executive order, which a lot of you are familiar with, I think, um, conservation easements and then, of course, eminent domain in this state. Jamie Dimon, the CEO of JPMorgan, has said using eminent domain, the government should take away farmland so that they can, uh, put up windmills. That's his suggestion. All in the name of climate change. Farm Journal's trust in beef program, which is where the $40 million went to. You can put, EID tag or a tracking device in your calf's ear, and they will store all your information, all that cattle all that animal's information. But then you put an app on your phone, and you put all of the information about your operation into that app, how you have to rotate your cattle, what you feed them, your land, soil. All that goes into the app. — So if you rotate or if you feed certain things, they're going to measure your carbon emissions before and after, and they're going to say that you're calculating your benefits. And so what do you think they're going to do with that information once they can control your entire operation and have all the measurements of carbon emissions from your entire operation, they're going to control every aspect of your life.”
3:18

American Rancher Warning America About What’s Being Threatened By The USDA & ESG Carbon Regulations - Big Agricultural Will Force All Smaller Farms Out - CEO for Rabobank said if you can't afford carbon offsets, you should not be allowed to fly. The only people that should be allowed to fly are those that can afford carbon offsets - Cameras To Monitor Citizens On How Far You Drive - They Will Control What You Eat & What Your Kids Eat In Schools - ADM and Tyson right now are in the middle of building $500 million dollar plants where they are going to grow insects for human consumption, all in the name of climate change - Digital Tracking Tags On Cattle - They want your land - & Much more all in the name of Climate Change “Agriculture cannot go along with this carbon deal. You cannot agree to have your carbon emissions measured in any way because what they want, like I read out of that Tyson Foods ESG report, what they want is your supplier data and a standardized way of calculating it. Because what do you think the next step is? They're going to want you to reduce it and reduce it and reduce it. It's $3,000,000,000 that the USDA took with no oversight. What they wanna do with it is build a system that measures your carbon emissions. They're kinda giving away what the problem is there. The problem is you and your carbon emissions. And all the bigwigs in agriculture have pretty much signed on to this deal and that narrative, that carbon emissions are this huge problem. But they also want to control how far you can travel. And they've actually tried to regulate this in different places in Europe where they put up cameras that monitor their citizens that make sure they're not traveling too far around the city or even driving older cars and things like that. And the citizens have cut the cameras down. The CEO for Rabobank had said if you can't afford carbon offsets, you should not be allowed to fly. The only people that should be allowed to fly are those that can afford carbon offsets. And if you're too poor to fly and you want to travel, you should put on a virtual reality headset, and that's how you can see the world. They also want to control what you eat. And the New York City schools right now, they have taken meat off the menu for at least 2 days of the week. And the New York City mayor has said that he is working on a plan where he will limit residents' ability to consume meat. And then you have also, you know, ADM and Tyson right now are in the middle of building $500,000,000 plants where they are going to grow insects for human consumption, all in the name of climate change. And they want your land. Biden's, uh, 30 by 30 executive order, which a lot of you are familiar with, I think, um, conservation easements and then, of course, eminent domain in this state. Jamie Dimon, the CEO of JPMorgan, has said using eminent domain, the government should take away farmland so that they can, uh, put up windmills. That's his suggestion. All in the name of climate change. Farm Journal's trust in beef program, which is where the $40 million went to. You can put, EID tag or a tracking device in your calf's ear, and they will store all your information, all that cattle all that animal's information. But then you put an app on your phone, and you put all of the information about your operation into that app, how you have to rotate your cattle, what you feed them, your land, soil. All that goes into the app. — So if you rotate or if you feed certain things, they're going to measure your carbon emissions before and after, and they're going to say that you're calculating your benefits. And so what do you think they're going to do with that information once they can control your entire operation and have all the measurements of carbon emissions from your entire operation, they're going to control every aspect of your life.”

Wall Street Apes

507,710 просмотров • 2 лет назад

🚨Crop Circles Are Still One of the Strangest Unanswered Questions But Why? Crop circles are one of those subjects people think they have figured out, no matter what side of the debate you sit on right? The easiest answer is that they are made by people with boards, ropes and a bit of planning, and that's fair because some most definitely are. But that doesn't answer why the phenomenon continues year on year. It doesn't explain why some formations appear with complex geometry, clean execution, unusual scale and almost no obvious ground disturbance. It doesn't explain why witnesses sometimes report lights, strange sounds, interference, or formations appearing in very short windows of time with nobody being seen during the formations. It definitely doesn't explain why the best ones feel like messages written in geometry, and that is exactly what keeps us all coming back. Crop circles are somewhere between art, folklore, hoax, mathematics, consciousness and the unknown. They are physical and visible. They can be photographed, measured, walked through and studied, and yet too this day the meaning remains elusive and different to almost everyone. So Are they human made land art, ritual symbols, social experiments, attempts to communicate? Or are they something stranger using the landscape as a canvas? The truth is probably messy. Some are most definitely fake and I accept that. Some are probably copycats of others. Some are truly beautiful human creations. But there are still formations that make you stop and ask why anyone would go to that level of effort in the dark, in a field, just to leave no signature and take no credit. That for me is one of the most questionable parts. Why go to all that trouble for zero recognition and risk getting arrested? The planning that it would take for some of these formations is absolutely incredible. A far cry from a couple of drunks with ropes and boards that's for sure. Organizing an army of people to coordinate and create these formations in short windows of time in the dark, must take months of preparation. The other questionable part for me, is why some formations have exploded nodes on the crop. Why crop in that area grows back bigger and stronger than the rest of the crop in that field. Why there are readings of elevated radioactivity in the formations, and feelings of euphoria for those that visit them? I'm not saying that crop circles are made by aliens, but they do prove something about us. We are still drawn to symbolism, we still look for patterns, because that is what we are, pattern recognition tools, no different to AI. But somewhere between the hoaxes and the mysteries, the question is still open enough to keep us all watching, because we don't have all of the answers. The reason for the post, is know a lot of people that research these formations. Each of them always has a different outlook on the meaning, but each as credible as the next. What I really want to know is... What do you think? #CropCircles #UAP #UFO #Mystery #Wiltshire #AncientSymbols #SacredGeometry #Disclosure #AlienLife #ufotwitter
5:01

🚨Crop Circles Are Still One of the Strangest Unanswered Questions But Why? Crop circles are one of those subjects people think they have figured out, no matter what side of the debate you sit on right? The easiest answer is that they are made by people with boards, ropes and a bit of planning, and that's fair because some most definitely are. But that doesn't answer why the phenomenon continues year on year. It doesn't explain why some formations appear with complex geometry, clean execution, unusual scale and almost no obvious ground disturbance. It doesn't explain why witnesses sometimes report lights, strange sounds, interference, or formations appearing in very short windows of time with nobody being seen during the formations. It definitely doesn't explain why the best ones feel like messages written in geometry, and that is exactly what keeps us all coming back. Crop circles are somewhere between art, folklore, hoax, mathematics, consciousness and the unknown. They are physical and visible. They can be photographed, measured, walked through and studied, and yet too this day the meaning remains elusive and different to almost everyone. So Are they human made land art, ritual symbols, social experiments, attempts to communicate? Or are they something stranger using the landscape as a canvas? The truth is probably messy. Some are most definitely fake and I accept that. Some are probably copycats of others. Some are truly beautiful human creations. But there are still formations that make you stop and ask why anyone would go to that level of effort in the dark, in a field, just to leave no signature and take no credit. That for me is one of the most questionable parts. Why go to all that trouble for zero recognition and risk getting arrested? The planning that it would take for some of these formations is absolutely incredible. A far cry from a couple of drunks with ropes and boards that's for sure. Organizing an army of people to coordinate and create these formations in short windows of time in the dark, must take months of preparation. The other questionable part for me, is why some formations have exploded nodes on the crop. Why crop in that area grows back bigger and stronger than the rest of the crop in that field. Why there are readings of elevated radioactivity in the formations, and feelings of euphoria for those that visit them? I'm not saying that crop circles are made by aliens, but they do prove something about us. We are still drawn to symbolism, we still look for patterns, because that is what we are, pattern recognition tools, no different to AI. But somewhere between the hoaxes and the mysteries, the question is still open enough to keep us all watching, because we don't have all of the answers. The reason for the post, is know a lot of people that research these formations. Each of them always has a different outlook on the meaning, but each as credible as the next. What I really want to know is... What do you think? #CropCircles #UAP #UFO #Mystery #Wiltshire #AncientSymbols #SacredGeometry #Disclosure #AlienLife #ufotwitter

Skywatch Signal

13,995 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Tucker Carlson: "The whole point is to humiliate and degrade the indigenous population of the British Isles, the white population. I mean, that's the whole point. And are they really going to do something about it? What would that be exactly? You'd really have to force a lot of people to go back to their countries of origin, millions of people, and you need to do it really soon." "And are they actually willing to do that? I don't know. But these are existential questions that we have been browbeat into ignoring for decades." "But the question is like, is Ireland Ireland? If it's majority non-Irish, oh, shut up. They're Irish. No, they're actually not Irish. Same with the UK, same with England, Scotland, Wales." "Like, it's all changing so fast. Nothing like this has ever happened in all of history, except when, say, the Mongols swept across the steppe and raped everybody. Like, that was true demographic change on this scale." "But even that wasn't as profound as what we're seeing in every white country around the world. I would say the West, but Australia and New Zealand also. So like, what is that? Now, my brain is not big enough to understand what that is. I think, I mean, I have a lot of theories about it, but I don't know if they're true. All I know is what the numbers are. And that's real." "And no one feels that he can say it. Everyone's like, oh, well, if that were happening in China or India or Malaysia or Senegal, it doesn't matter. You'd be like, what the hell is that? Like, the population is totally different." "Look at graduation. Pick, I don't know, King's College Law School and look at the graduation picture for the last 30 years. Who's in it? Just like, let your eyes tell you the truth for once." "Like, this is a total change in population. Is it better? Is it worse? Can't have that conversation. Who's pushing this? Does the population want it? The population clearly doesn't want it." "There's no polling that's meaningful on the subject. I mean, there's no referendum on it. You don't get to decide. You've got no voice in it other than you get to go to jail if you complain loudly enough about it. What is this? I think it's the biggest and darkest thing that has happened in the last thousand years, for sure. And I think it's leading somewhere really, really bad." "It's not happening by accident. That's obvious because it's only happening in white countries. I mean, I think. Oh, shut up, white supremacist. In fact, I'm not a white supremacist. I'm just noticing what the hell's going on."
2:08

Tucker Carlson: "The whole point is to humiliate and degrade the indigenous population of the British Isles, the white population. I mean, that's the whole point. And are they really going to do something about it? What would that be exactly? You'd really have to force a lot of people to go back to their countries of origin, millions of people, and you need to do it really soon." "And are they actually willing to do that? I don't know. But these are existential questions that we have been browbeat into ignoring for decades." "But the question is like, is Ireland Ireland? If it's majority non-Irish, oh, shut up. They're Irish. No, they're actually not Irish. Same with the UK, same with England, Scotland, Wales." "Like, it's all changing so fast. Nothing like this has ever happened in all of history, except when, say, the Mongols swept across the steppe and raped everybody. Like, that was true demographic change on this scale." "But even that wasn't as profound as what we're seeing in every white country around the world. I would say the West, but Australia and New Zealand also. So like, what is that? Now, my brain is not big enough to understand what that is. I think, I mean, I have a lot of theories about it, but I don't know if they're true. All I know is what the numbers are. And that's real." "And no one feels that he can say it. Everyone's like, oh, well, if that were happening in China or India or Malaysia or Senegal, it doesn't matter. You'd be like, what the hell is that? Like, the population is totally different." "Look at graduation. Pick, I don't know, King's College Law School and look at the graduation picture for the last 30 years. Who's in it? Just like, let your eyes tell you the truth for once." "Like, this is a total change in population. Is it better? Is it worse? Can't have that conversation. Who's pushing this? Does the population want it? The population clearly doesn't want it." "There's no polling that's meaningful on the subject. I mean, there's no referendum on it. You don't get to decide. You've got no voice in it other than you get to go to jail if you complain loudly enough about it. What is this? I think it's the biggest and darkest thing that has happened in the last thousand years, for sure. And I think it's leading somewhere really, really bad." "It's not happening by accident. That's obvious because it's only happening in white countries. I mean, I think. Oh, shut up, white supremacist. In fact, I'm not a white supremacist. I'm just noticing what the hell's going on."

Camus

876,281 просмотров • 1 год назад

We import US$ 23 million chicken neck and back is what we import annually to Jamaica, close to US$13 million in beef offals, beef trimmings US$ 16 million, rice US$84 million.... You may ask why there are so many parts of an animal and rice. Most Jamaicans cannot afford chicken, beef, or fish to feed their families, so they must resort to cuts and trimmings. In other words “Di Pot a boil but di food nuh nuff.” Disclaimer: I am not in the PNP's shadow cabinet, so what I am about to say may not contend. But this is something I've been speaking and writing about for years. I would like you to think for yourself and re-examine with data some long-held beliefs that others have tried to impose on you, saying they are supposed to be in your self-interest. Today, I want to highlight and explain just one and why it is a significant reason why our people remain unhealthy with obesity, high blood pressure, and other primary health ailments. They cannot afford to buy a balanced food basket because the cost of chicken is out of their reach. For decades, Jamaica has had 250% duty protection on chicken meat. Globally, the average import duty rate on chicken in other countries is 24%, so why must it be 250% in Jamaica? (it’s actually 260%) Is this really in our people's national interest, or are we serving the interest of a very few individuals, in particular 2 companies? Before you have a knee-jerk reaction to 'yes, it helps local production," let us look at the data rather than an emotion. The International cost breakdown of a chicken is feed (largely corn) at 61%, baby chicks at 18%, housing at 7%, others at 10%, and labor at only 4%. We do not make feed in Jamaica. We don't produce corn. We don't produce wheat or soybean; the inputs that go into feed. What we refer to as feed mills in Jamaica are really big silos and a mixer that blends these imported inputs into the final product, much the same as concrete is composed of sand, stone, cement, and water. But at least in concrete, all the inputs are produced in Jamaica, so the "local " feed is a totally imported product. So, in effect, the local Jamaican direct cost input of chicken is less than 10%. Therefore, I challenge the logic of providing excessive duty protection to any product with a local input of less than 20%, much less chicken, whose input is less than 10%. All the inputs in animal feed are traded as commodities on the world market, like oil; the price fluctuates in keeping with the law of supply and demand. The price of corn has fallen from $801 (US/Bu) April 2022 ,to less than $392.50today ( Check it yourself on on straight mathematical terms with 50% reduction in the cost of feed which represents 61% of the cost input of chicken our chicken prices should have gone down by about 30%, but instead it went up. Who benefits? Certainly not the Jamaican public whose citizens find it hard to afford a whole chicken dinner, certainly not the workers at the factory whose pay remains much the same, and certainly not the Jamaican economy as there has been little or no growth in our agricultural sector generally for years. Did you know that if you apply for a permit to import a container of chicken in any form, the ministry of agriculture first refers the matter to the two chicken monopoly producers to find out if they have any objections? Tell them to challenge me on this! What do you think is their response? With that system in place, there is effectively no real competition in the marketplace. In fact there is no marketplace. You pay what the two local monopolies decide you should pay. Since it’s so obvious, you will wonder why this backward policy has continued. Well, the false theory is that we are saving the livelihood of the 30,000 small farmers. But is this really true?
8:31

We import US$ 23 million chicken neck and back is what we import annually to Jamaica, close to US$13 million in beef offals, beef trimmings US$ 16 million, rice US$84 million.... You may ask why there are so many parts of an animal and rice. Most Jamaicans cannot afford chicken, beef, or fish to feed their families, so they must resort to cuts and trimmings. In other words “Di Pot a boil but di food nuh nuff.” Disclaimer: I am not in the PNP's shadow cabinet, so what I am about to say may not contend. But this is something I've been speaking and writing about for years. I would like you to think for yourself and re-examine with data some long-held beliefs that others have tried to impose on you, saying they are supposed to be in your self-interest. Today, I want to highlight and explain just one and why it is a significant reason why our people remain unhealthy with obesity, high blood pressure, and other primary health ailments. They cannot afford to buy a balanced food basket because the cost of chicken is out of their reach. For decades, Jamaica has had 250% duty protection on chicken meat. Globally, the average import duty rate on chicken in other countries is 24%, so why must it be 250% in Jamaica? (it’s actually 260%) Is this really in our people's national interest, or are we serving the interest of a very few individuals, in particular 2 companies? Before you have a knee-jerk reaction to 'yes, it helps local production," let us look at the data rather than an emotion. The International cost breakdown of a chicken is feed (largely corn) at 61%, baby chicks at 18%, housing at 7%, others at 10%, and labor at only 4%. We do not make feed in Jamaica. We don't produce corn. We don't produce wheat or soybean; the inputs that go into feed. What we refer to as feed mills in Jamaica are really big silos and a mixer that blends these imported inputs into the final product, much the same as concrete is composed of sand, stone, cement, and water. But at least in concrete, all the inputs are produced in Jamaica, so the "local " feed is a totally imported product. So, in effect, the local Jamaican direct cost input of chicken is less than 10%. Therefore, I challenge the logic of providing excessive duty protection to any product with a local input of less than 20%, much less chicken, whose input is less than 10%. All the inputs in animal feed are traded as commodities on the world market, like oil; the price fluctuates in keeping with the law of supply and demand. The price of corn has fallen from $801 (US/Bu) April 2022 ,to less than $392.50today ( Check it yourself on on straight mathematical terms with 50% reduction in the cost of feed which represents 61% of the cost input of chicken our chicken prices should have gone down by about 30%, but instead it went up. Who benefits? Certainly not the Jamaican public whose citizens find it hard to afford a whole chicken dinner, certainly not the workers at the factory whose pay remains much the same, and certainly not the Jamaican economy as there has been little or no growth in our agricultural sector generally for years. Did you know that if you apply for a permit to import a container of chicken in any form, the ministry of agriculture first refers the matter to the two chicken monopoly producers to find out if they have any objections? Tell them to challenge me on this! What do you think is their response? With that system in place, there is effectively no real competition in the marketplace. In fact there is no marketplace. You pay what the two local monopolies decide you should pay. Since it’s so obvious, you will wonder why this backward policy has continued. Well, the false theory is that we are saving the livelihood of the 30,000 small farmers. But is this really true?

Lisa Hanna™️

32,606 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Dear Ian Carroll, I want to take a moment to address what you said about me and my comments in your video—without snark or personal animus. When you say, “The Jews are wonderful,” and insist you’re merely exploring a connection between Israel, Epstein, and Jewish influence, I want to believe you. But based on your past statements, I think at best, you are naively playing with fire, and at worst, you are being disingenuous—aware that making certain insinuations under the guise of intellectual curiosity is enough to set in motion others who will state more explicitly what you only imply. It’s not any single remark that alarms me, but the pattern of statements you’ve made, including: 1.Suggesting that Israel was behind 9/11 and that Israelis—or Jews—celebrated the attacks, even going so far as to claim Israel mocked 9/11 in its 10/7 post about “dancing again.” 2.Claiming that the Scofield Bible was bankrolled by the Rothschilds as a Zionist operation to subvert Christianity and advance Jewish/Zionist interests. 3.Failing to push back in a conversation on the Hodgetwins podcast when it was suggested that Jews are “behind pornography” as part of an anti-civilizational plot. Instead, you commented that you had heard about it and found it intriguing. While you didn’t originate the claim, public figures have a responsibility to challenge such narratives when they are put forward in front of large audiences. Again, this isn’t about one isolated comment but the totality of your rhetoric, which indicates you are either recklessly entertaining antisemitic tropes or deliberately introducing them in a way that lets others take them further. As with all conspiracy theories, there are kernels of truth. No theory is entirely fabricated—they gain traction because they weave in elements of reality. But that doesn’t make them harmless. I believe you are irresponsibly connecting horrific events—9/11, pedophilia sex rings, and the subversion of Christianity—directly to the only Jewish nation on earth. While you may insist you are only criticizing Israel’s government, your language and framing suggest otherwise. Maybe this is naïveté on your part. I’m not saying the rise in antisemitism—or the increasing risk Jews face in America—is solely your responsibility. But you are, knowingly or not, helping lay the groundwork for the kind of rhetoric that has historically fueled antisemitic oppression and violence. I hope you reflect honestly on this, even if only small parts resonate with you. I will always defend your right to say whatever you want—I’m not calling for you to be deplatformed or banned. But I am asking you to consider the responsibility that comes with influence, and the ways in which our words can shape discourse for better or worse. Thank you for your time.
2:10

Dear Ian Carroll, I want to take a moment to address what you said about me and my comments in your video—without snark or personal animus. When you say, “The Jews are wonderful,” and insist you’re merely exploring a connection between Israel, Epstein, and Jewish influence, I want to believe you. But based on your past statements, I think at best, you are naively playing with fire, and at worst, you are being disingenuous—aware that making certain insinuations under the guise of intellectual curiosity is enough to set in motion others who will state more explicitly what you only imply. It’s not any single remark that alarms me, but the pattern of statements you’ve made, including: 1.Suggesting that Israel was behind 9/11 and that Israelis—or Jews—celebrated the attacks, even going so far as to claim Israel mocked 9/11 in its 10/7 post about “dancing again.” 2.Claiming that the Scofield Bible was bankrolled by the Rothschilds as a Zionist operation to subvert Christianity and advance Jewish/Zionist interests. 3.Failing to push back in a conversation on the Hodgetwins podcast when it was suggested that Jews are “behind pornography” as part of an anti-civilizational plot. Instead, you commented that you had heard about it and found it intriguing. While you didn’t originate the claim, public figures have a responsibility to challenge such narratives when they are put forward in front of large audiences. Again, this isn’t about one isolated comment but the totality of your rhetoric, which indicates you are either recklessly entertaining antisemitic tropes or deliberately introducing them in a way that lets others take them further. As with all conspiracy theories, there are kernels of truth. No theory is entirely fabricated—they gain traction because they weave in elements of reality. But that doesn’t make them harmless. I believe you are irresponsibly connecting horrific events—9/11, pedophilia sex rings, and the subversion of Christianity—directly to the only Jewish nation on earth. While you may insist you are only criticizing Israel’s government, your language and framing suggest otherwise. Maybe this is naïveté on your part. I’m not saying the rise in antisemitism—or the increasing risk Jews face in America—is solely your responsibility. But you are, knowingly or not, helping lay the groundwork for the kind of rhetoric that has historically fueled antisemitic oppression and violence. I hope you reflect honestly on this, even if only small parts resonate with you. I will always defend your right to say whatever you want—I’m not calling for you to be deplatformed or banned. But I am asking you to consider the responsibility that comes with influence, and the ways in which our words can shape discourse for better or worse. Thank you for your time.

Frank McCormick

279,553 просмотров • 1 год назад

I hear so often from the Dommes I work with that they struggle with people online fetichizing them and simply seeing them for how sexy and beautiful they are. They project their fantasies and their desires onto you. That stops immediately once you move the attention from you to them. From 'look at me' to 'I see you'. What does that look like? When you create content, think of them and what this scene or that narrative is evoking. What will they learn from you? What they want is not to passively watch how sexy you are, but for you to train them, to give them instructions, to teach them, to guide them, to be in charge, to command them. This is not being an object but the main subject. The Authority figure. How is your content already doing that. The sexy photos can still be there, they are important to already capture des attention. But what you do with that attention once you have it, is where the power dynamic is established. Positioning yourself as more than a stunning Goddess, but actually a woman who has a voice, opinions, perspective, a philosophy, a way to doing things, teaching them what you like, how you like it, why you like it, already makes them want to be that for you. You hold the attention, you hold the power, so you direct it. And for that, you want them to know you get them and you know what lives within them... that creates the desire for you to be the one exposing it. You instantly build trust. Not because you demanded it, but because you earned it: you showed them you know what you are doing. You have experience, you understand them. They are not told to come see you, they are seduced into it. They desire it. And they will work for it. This will attract better clients (real subs) and instead of you trying to get their attention, they will work to earn yours. If you want to learn more about power dynamics, building a brand as a Pro or the psychology behind BDSM, you can now access all my trainings and classes in one place for a fraction of the cost of The Dominatrix Academy. And you can reinvest the total amount towards the Program. Message me [SECRET] for the details. This offer is not available on my website.
0:51

I hear so often from the Dommes I work with that they struggle with people online fetichizing them and simply seeing them for how sexy and beautiful they are. They project their fantasies and their desires onto you. That stops immediately once you move the attention from you to them. From 'look at me' to 'I see you'. What does that look like? When you create content, think of them and what this scene or that narrative is evoking. What will they learn from you? What they want is not to passively watch how sexy you are, but for you to train them, to give them instructions, to teach them, to guide them, to be in charge, to command them. This is not being an object but the main subject. The Authority figure. How is your content already doing that. The sexy photos can still be there, they are important to already capture des attention. But what you do with that attention once you have it, is where the power dynamic is established. Positioning yourself as more than a stunning Goddess, but actually a woman who has a voice, opinions, perspective, a philosophy, a way to doing things, teaching them what you like, how you like it, why you like it, already makes them want to be that for you. You hold the attention, you hold the power, so you direct it. And for that, you want them to know you get them and you know what lives within them... that creates the desire for you to be the one exposing it. You instantly build trust. Not because you demanded it, but because you earned it: you showed them you know what you are doing. You have experience, you understand them. They are not told to come see you, they are seduced into it. They desire it. And they will work for it. This will attract better clients (real subs) and instead of you trying to get their attention, they will work to earn yours. If you want to learn more about power dynamics, building a brand as a Pro or the psychology behind BDSM, you can now access all my trainings and classes in one place for a fraction of the cost of The Dominatrix Academy. And you can reinvest the total amount towards the Program. Message me [SECRET] for the details. This offer is not available on my website.

Ms. Malissia

17,675 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

🚨EMMNAUEL TODD KILLED ALL WARMONGERS IN EUROPE 🚨Emmanuel Todd: "We must stop LYING about PUTIN and the WAR." 🚨 I say that the number of anti-Russian provocations is such that peace continues in Europe because the Russians are calm and have a particular kind of self-control. 🚨I'm saying is that if Germany, I mean, really gets involved in this war and Merz ... well, you really have to listen to the Germans right now. 🚨Merz talks about the Russians as if they are barbarians. Well, it was still the Wehrmacht that killed 25 to 27 000 000 million Soviets. 🚨 Regarding Germany, for me, there is a possibility that the Russians might lose their composure. 🚨The risk, the nuclear risk always exists. 🚨Russian superiority in the field of hypersonic missiles is such that they probably wouldn't even need nuclear weapons to stop Europe if it did something foolish. 🚨The war is over in 10 days. 🚨 We need to listen to the Russians. 🚨European elites dream of a war with Russia to escape their responsibilities. 🚨 It's so obvious that the Russians really have no desire to make war on Europe. 🚨 What I'm trying to make understood, is that the statements from English, German, and French leaders about a Russian desire to threaten Western Europe are delusional statements that must have a cause. And for me, this cause has nothing to do with Russian attitudes. It's connected to what is the real subject of my book, namely the internal disintegration of Western societies, especially European ones, the state of crisis, the state of emptiness which is not the same in France or in Germany. 🚨 - You say that it is already won by the Russians. We're in the last year now, we're in the last year. 🚨When, that end arrives, our leaders will have to be held accountable to us and to the Ukrainians whom they encouraged to fight to the death and the complete destruction of their state. And what I'm afraid of, is that, vaguely, our leaders, the German leaders, the British leaders are telling themselves that as long as the war continues, they are safe. 🚨You see, the risk for our leaders. 📑As for me, that's why they accuse me, of being pro-Putin, because I try to think ... You say that's not true, you say this accusation is ... Well, anyway, it's me, I'm French and nothing else, you know. So, but I think I understand fairly well, or have understood fairly well the way the Russians work, which is rational, defensive, and cold. I don't know if we realize when we see the operations carried out by the United States, the attacks on Iran, the irrational behavior of the government. We, have this paradox of dictatorships or authoritarian regimes that are more predictable and rational than, than we are. We don't realize what a good part of what remains of peace in Europe. I'm going to say exactly the opposite of what everyone else is saying. Everyone says: Russia wants to attack Europe. Everyone says that Russia is the threat. Me, what I say ... Today, we hear it, the President of the Republic says it. I say exactly the opposite. I say that the number of anti-Russian provocations is such that peace continues in Europe because the Russians are calm and have a particular kind of self-control. Yes, but what I mean is, you say that Putin is calm. But what I'm saying is that I mean, in the book, what I'm saying is that if Germany, I mean, really gets involved in this war and Merz ... well, you really have to listen to the Germans right now. Merz talks about the Russians as if they are barbarians. Well, it was still the Wehrmacht that killed 25 to 27 000 000 million Soviets. And I'm saying that, regarding Germany, for me, there is a possibility that the Russians might lose their composure. That's the real risk. No, but here, I'm going back to the question. The situation, the situation is totally the opposite of what is being said. There is a nuclear risk in that case, you're saying otherwise .... The risk, the nuclear risk always exists. At this stage, I think I'm going to say something reassuring. Russian superiority in the field of hypersonic missiles is such that they probably wouldn't even need nuclear weapons to stop Europe if it did something foolish. But we need to listen to the Russians. Lavrov said it. But people don't listen, people don't listen to… Lavrov said, "But be careful, we do not want war." But if you send troops into Ukraine to the Europeans, well, that will be considered an act of war. And I'm telling you that this war will be of a very different nature than what is happening in Ukraine. It will be a very short war. Yes. And I can interpret. That's because, in Ukraine, for the Russians, it's about reclaiming territory. You say they won't go any further than a certain limit in Ukraine. They will not attack Europe, unlike the threat— It's not in their interest. I'm saying it very clearly. Anyway, I think they want to go as far as Odessa to secure the Black Sea, that they're going to go as far as the Dnieper. I think they probably want to turn Ukraine into a rump state. But Russia absolutely does not have the means, I mean, in terms of demographics or strategic interest. Russia is already 17 000 000 million square kilometers. Why would they want to create more problems for themselves with the Poles, whom they've never gotten along with historically? Yes, so why are we acting? Why, in your opinion, are we acting? It is a threat. I would still like to finish on what a war between .... since I personally think that some European elites dream of a war with Russia to escape their responsibilities. But it would be an explosion. That's one of the things we have to be able to imagine in order to avoid it. But if you listen to Macron, if you listen to Merz, If you listen, I can't even recall the name of the new British Prime Minister. I mean, they ... they tell us. It's like they're preparing us for war with Russia. So for me.... Preparing so that we don't have to endure it. That's what they'll tell you. But everyone knows very well. The Russians don't have neither the means nor the desire. War on land, invasion, what the war in Ukraine has shown, is that war, where you actually occupy territory, was extremely difficult and costly because of drones. To the extent that the only war that might happen between Europe and Russia for the Russians would be a defensive war, just to prevent the Europeans from entering Ukraine. Everyone, and that's why it would be short and not costly for them given their superiority. It's simply, I guess, I do, I'm not saying it's true, but I try to put myself in that frame of mind where you say well, let's imagine all the possibilities so we can prevent this from happening. So what is a short war? Well, the Russians are troubled by all the efforts of Europe's industries and media and launch hypersonic missiles at all the military industries of Western Europe. And the war is over in 10 days. That's that's that's what is being mentioned. It's not, Lavrov didn't say that, but that's what I heard. No one could wish for that. But but no one. No one in Europe could wish for that. But no one. So, that's where the real question is. The real question. The peoples of Europe, obviously, they don't want that. But truly, it's so obvious that the Russians really have no desire to make war on Europe. They just want to be left alone to devour Ukraine. Nothing more. But isn't that intolerable? Emmanuel Todd, isn't that intolerable? That's what's happening right now. I'm not going back over that. That's what's happening right now. From the Russian point of view, it's defensive, but I'm not even going to defend them. What I'm trying to make understood, is that the statements from English, German, and French leaders about a Russian desire to threaten Western Europe are delusional statements that must have a cause. And for me, this cause has nothing to do with Russian attitudes. It's connected to what is the real subject of my book, namely the internal disintegration of Western societies, especially European ones, the state of crisis, the state of emptiness which is not the same in France or in Germany. And among our leaders, no doubt, I think about it more and more these days, there is the feeling that, well if the war in Ukraine ends and if it ends ... You say that it is already won by the Russians. That's what you're saying, then. We're ... we're in the last year now, we're in the last year. You say that it is won by the Russians. They're advancing, all right. So, and therefore we will, I mean, the most horrible wars all come to an end. And when, that end arrives, our leaders will have to be held accountable to us and to the Ukrainians whom they encouraged to fight to the death and the complete destruction of their state. And what I'm afraid of, is that, vaguely, our leaders, the German leaders, the British leaders are telling themselves that as long as the war continues, they are safe. You see, the risk for our leaders.
7:58

🚨EMMNAUEL TODD KILLED ALL WARMONGERS IN EUROPE 🚨Emmanuel Todd: "We must stop LYING about PUTIN and the WAR." 🚨 I say that the number of anti-Russian provocations is such that peace continues in Europe because the Russians are calm and have a particular kind of self-control. 🚨I'm saying is that if Germany, I mean, really gets involved in this war and Merz ... well, you really have to listen to the Germans right now. 🚨Merz talks about the Russians as if they are barbarians. Well, it was still the Wehrmacht that killed 25 to 27 000 000 million Soviets. 🚨 Regarding Germany, for me, there is a possibility that the Russians might lose their composure. 🚨The risk, the nuclear risk always exists. 🚨Russian superiority in the field of hypersonic missiles is such that they probably wouldn't even need nuclear weapons to stop Europe if it did something foolish. 🚨The war is over in 10 days. 🚨 We need to listen to the Russians. 🚨European elites dream of a war with Russia to escape their responsibilities. 🚨 It's so obvious that the Russians really have no desire to make war on Europe. 🚨 What I'm trying to make understood, is that the statements from English, German, and French leaders about a Russian desire to threaten Western Europe are delusional statements that must have a cause. And for me, this cause has nothing to do with Russian attitudes. It's connected to what is the real subject of my book, namely the internal disintegration of Western societies, especially European ones, the state of crisis, the state of emptiness which is not the same in France or in Germany. 🚨 - You say that it is already won by the Russians. We're in the last year now, we're in the last year. 🚨When, that end arrives, our leaders will have to be held accountable to us and to the Ukrainians whom they encouraged to fight to the death and the complete destruction of their state. And what I'm afraid of, is that, vaguely, our leaders, the German leaders, the British leaders are telling themselves that as long as the war continues, they are safe. 🚨You see, the risk for our leaders. 📑As for me, that's why they accuse me, of being pro-Putin, because I try to think ... You say that's not true, you say this accusation is ... Well, anyway, it's me, I'm French and nothing else, you know. So, but I think I understand fairly well, or have understood fairly well the way the Russians work, which is rational, defensive, and cold. I don't know if we realize when we see the operations carried out by the United States, the attacks on Iran, the irrational behavior of the government. We, have this paradox of dictatorships or authoritarian regimes that are more predictable and rational than, than we are. We don't realize what a good part of what remains of peace in Europe. I'm going to say exactly the opposite of what everyone else is saying. Everyone says: Russia wants to attack Europe. Everyone says that Russia is the threat. Me, what I say ... Today, we hear it, the President of the Republic says it. I say exactly the opposite. I say that the number of anti-Russian provocations is such that peace continues in Europe because the Russians are calm and have a particular kind of self-control. Yes, but what I mean is, you say that Putin is calm. But what I'm saying is that I mean, in the book, what I'm saying is that if Germany, I mean, really gets involved in this war and Merz ... well, you really have to listen to the Germans right now. Merz talks about the Russians as if they are barbarians. Well, it was still the Wehrmacht that killed 25 to 27 000 000 million Soviets. And I'm saying that, regarding Germany, for me, there is a possibility that the Russians might lose their composure. That's the real risk. No, but here, I'm going back to the question. The situation, the situation is totally the opposite of what is being said. There is a nuclear risk in that case, you're saying otherwise .... The risk, the nuclear risk always exists. At this stage, I think I'm going to say something reassuring. Russian superiority in the field of hypersonic missiles is such that they probably wouldn't even need nuclear weapons to stop Europe if it did something foolish. But we need to listen to the Russians. Lavrov said it. But people don't listen, people don't listen to… Lavrov said, "But be careful, we do not want war." But if you send troops into Ukraine to the Europeans, well, that will be considered an act of war. And I'm telling you that this war will be of a very different nature than what is happening in Ukraine. It will be a very short war. Yes. And I can interpret. That's because, in Ukraine, for the Russians, it's about reclaiming territory. You say they won't go any further than a certain limit in Ukraine. They will not attack Europe, unlike the threat— It's not in their interest. I'm saying it very clearly. Anyway, I think they want to go as far as Odessa to secure the Black Sea, that they're going to go as far as the Dnieper. I think they probably want to turn Ukraine into a rump state. But Russia absolutely does not have the means, I mean, in terms of demographics or strategic interest. Russia is already 17 000 000 million square kilometers. Why would they want to create more problems for themselves with the Poles, whom they've never gotten along with historically? Yes, so why are we acting? Why, in your opinion, are we acting? It is a threat. I would still like to finish on what a war between .... since I personally think that some European elites dream of a war with Russia to escape their responsibilities. But it would be an explosion. That's one of the things we have to be able to imagine in order to avoid it. But if you listen to Macron, if you listen to Merz, If you listen, I can't even recall the name of the new British Prime Minister. I mean, they ... they tell us. It's like they're preparing us for war with Russia. So for me.... Preparing so that we don't have to endure it. That's what they'll tell you. But everyone knows very well. The Russians don't have neither the means nor the desire. War on land, invasion, what the war in Ukraine has shown, is that war, where you actually occupy territory, was extremely difficult and costly because of drones. To the extent that the only war that might happen between Europe and Russia for the Russians would be a defensive war, just to prevent the Europeans from entering Ukraine. Everyone, and that's why it would be short and not costly for them given their superiority. It's simply, I guess, I do, I'm not saying it's true, but I try to put myself in that frame of mind where you say well, let's imagine all the possibilities so we can prevent this from happening. So what is a short war? Well, the Russians are troubled by all the efforts of Europe's industries and media and launch hypersonic missiles at all the military industries of Western Europe. And the war is over in 10 days. That's that's that's what is being mentioned. It's not, Lavrov didn't say that, but that's what I heard. No one could wish for that. But but no one. No one in Europe could wish for that. But no one. So, that's where the real question is. The real question. The peoples of Europe, obviously, they don't want that. But truly, it's so obvious that the Russians really have no desire to make war on Europe. They just want to be left alone to devour Ukraine. Nothing more. But isn't that intolerable? Emmanuel Todd, isn't that intolerable? That's what's happening right now. I'm not going back over that. That's what's happening right now. From the Russian point of view, it's defensive, but I'm not even going to defend them. What I'm trying to make understood, is that the statements from English, German, and French leaders about a Russian desire to threaten Western Europe are delusional statements that must have a cause. And for me, this cause has nothing to do with Russian attitudes. It's connected to what is the real subject of my book, namely the internal disintegration of Western societies, especially European ones, the state of crisis, the state of emptiness which is not the same in France or in Germany. And among our leaders, no doubt, I think about it more and more these days, there is the feeling that, well if the war in Ukraine ends and if it ends ... You say that it is already won by the Russians. That's what you're saying, then. We're ... we're in the last year now, we're in the last year. You say that it is won by the Russians. They're advancing, all right. So, and therefore we will, I mean, the most horrible wars all come to an end. And when, that end arrives, our leaders will have to be held accountable to us and to the Ukrainians whom they encouraged to fight to the death and the complete destruction of their state. And what I'm afraid of, is that, vaguely, our leaders, the German leaders, the British leaders are telling themselves that as long as the war continues, they are safe. You see, the risk for our leaders.

Ignorance, the root and stem of all evil

52,848 просмотров • 11 дней назад

Are we addicted to distraction? Ted Gioia says: "We live in a Dopamine Culture, and it's a culture of distraction. This is fundamentally different from the past. 20 years ago, if I had a debate with somebody about the culture, it would've been about art vs. entertainment. The art is more demanding, more rigorous, and forces you out of your comfort zone. Entertainment is something that's more adapted to what your expectations are and it's more formulaic. But now we've got a third category. You've got art, you've got entertainment, but this is just distraction. Like people scrolling on videos on their phone. Like a video of somebody's pet, or a photo of their meal or something like that. You can't even call that entertainment. It's just a distraction. What we find is that it gives a jolt of dopamine to the brain. The people that design these social media platforms, all of them in the last 12 to 18 months, shifted to these scrolling and reeling interfaces. Now they haven't told you why, but the reason why they're doing this is it's addictive. If you get in a dopamine hit every 15 seconds, it's an addictive process. If you stay on your phone, they can give you more ads. This is no different than what companies do in other product areas. I knew some people who work at a very large potato chip company, which I will not mention by name, but they said, "Well, Ted, you have no idea. We worked for years to find exactly how to have a potato chip so that you ate it, and there was a flavor in your mouth, and it died in a certain number of seconds, so you had to reach for another potato chip." We make these things addictive. The goal is to make them addictive because that's how we maximize sales. Now nobody in Silicon Valley will tell you this, but all the Silicon Valley companies with these social media platforms have made similar research. I'm sure. And they show we have this scrolling interface, and so people are addicted to distraction. This can't be good for the culture." Ted Gioia
2:38

Are we addicted to distraction? Ted Gioia says: "We live in a Dopamine Culture, and it's a culture of distraction. This is fundamentally different from the past. 20 years ago, if I had a debate with somebody about the culture, it would've been about art vs. entertainment. The art is more demanding, more rigorous, and forces you out of your comfort zone. Entertainment is something that's more adapted to what your expectations are and it's more formulaic. But now we've got a third category. You've got art, you've got entertainment, but this is just distraction. Like people scrolling on videos on their phone. Like a video of somebody's pet, or a photo of their meal or something like that. You can't even call that entertainment. It's just a distraction. What we find is that it gives a jolt of dopamine to the brain. The people that design these social media platforms, all of them in the last 12 to 18 months, shifted to these scrolling and reeling interfaces. Now they haven't told you why, but the reason why they're doing this is it's addictive. If you get in a dopamine hit every 15 seconds, it's an addictive process. If you stay on your phone, they can give you more ads. This is no different than what companies do in other product areas. I knew some people who work at a very large potato chip company, which I will not mention by name, but they said, "Well, Ted, you have no idea. We worked for years to find exactly how to have a potato chip so that you ate it, and there was a flavor in your mouth, and it died in a certain number of seconds, so you had to reach for another potato chip." We make these things addictive. The goal is to make them addictive because that's how we maximize sales. Now nobody in Silicon Valley will tell you this, but all the Silicon Valley companies with these social media platforms have made similar research. I'm sure. And they show we have this scrolling interface, and so people are addicted to distraction. This can't be good for the culture." Ted Gioia

David Perell

57,913 просмотров • 2 лет назад

All over the country, I get people who say to me, "You know what I was at a dinner and there were 10 or 12 people. Two of them were Jews. And somebody said, 'oh, it's genocide, it's apartheid,' whatever it is. And the Jews, they stayed silent. So we all just went home and assumed that it was true." It's not nice to say, many of us have been in that situation. That is how they feel whether you like it or not. So I know that it's awkward to say something back to a person at dinner. I know that it's hard to make the dinner difficult. Maybe even lose a friend. But let me tell you, it'll be much more awkward for you 20 or 30 years from now, if not 20% or 30% of people, but 100% of your fellow Americans believe that you and your children and grandchildren are genocidal monsters. It'll be much more awkward then. So, It's time to wake up and nip this thing in the bud. We are the Jewish people. We gave the world not just Jesus and monotheism and the Bible — a system of political democracy. We're the first people to say, you don't need a God to be your King. You don't need to have a Queen who's divine. Every single one of you has a light within yourself to be equal under the law for our God. All political democracy stems from that. Remember who we are, be proud of where you come from. And be optimistic that just as for thousands of years, there have been cataclysmic problems brought on by much bigger and more powerful empires than a few people with purple hair on the Upper West Side, and they are all gone now. But we are still here. Know that. Internalize that. And put that into your conversations.
2:21

All over the country, I get people who say to me, "You know what I was at a dinner and there were 10 or 12 people. Two of them were Jews. And somebody said, 'oh, it's genocide, it's apartheid,' whatever it is. And the Jews, they stayed silent. So we all just went home and assumed that it was true." It's not nice to say, many of us have been in that situation. That is how they feel whether you like it or not. So I know that it's awkward to say something back to a person at dinner. I know that it's hard to make the dinner difficult. Maybe even lose a friend. But let me tell you, it'll be much more awkward for you 20 or 30 years from now, if not 20% or 30% of people, but 100% of your fellow Americans believe that you and your children and grandchildren are genocidal monsters. It'll be much more awkward then. So, It's time to wake up and nip this thing in the bud. We are the Jewish people. We gave the world not just Jesus and monotheism and the Bible — a system of political democracy. We're the first people to say, you don't need a God to be your King. You don't need to have a Queen who's divine. Every single one of you has a light within yourself to be equal under the law for our God. All political democracy stems from that. Remember who we are, be proud of where you come from. And be optimistic that just as for thousands of years, there have been cataclysmic problems brought on by much bigger and more powerful empires than a few people with purple hair on the Upper West Side, and they are all gone now. But we are still here. Know that. Internalize that. And put that into your conversations.

Roy K. Altman

43,019 просмотров • 10 дней назад

What an interesting voicemail left for Hank Brennan during the Karen Read trial from a former DOJ paralaegal! Transcript: Hi, Mr. Brennan, if this is your voicemail, you're not listed in the select by name directory, understandably, but especially now. You know, I'm a former paralegal at DOJ, but now living in Tennessee, retired because of a disability. And I just have to say, I'm so disappointed in you. I left a message that was actually pleasant for Mr. Lally at the end of the other trial, because I felt like he was kind of being forced to turn a blind eye, and may even be trying to intentionally lose, because he deep down has his own suspicions. Um, you must, or you are really not watching the entirety of the previous trial, but I want you to know that what you're saying today is in direct contradiction to your own former witness Brian Albert's testimony, where he said he let Chloe out right at that time because he knew that some experts may deduce that they are dog bites. And that was leaving open the possibility that she attacked John's body outside where it wasn't even there yet. But, but at that time, you know, when they later said that Karen hit him, um, You must know that there's ample reasonable doubt or you wouldn't be going after expert witnesses. And just as a Christian, I am a, you know, fairly astute former paralegal, but also as a Christian, you know, uh, you know, you're going to have to answer to a higher power. And right now I would like to go with you to see Chloe since you did, she takes the beer out and say, sick of myself. For her to bite either D.A. Morrissey or you, but somehow I still don't feel like that way toward Mr. Lally. Um, and then you'll have a comparison of exactly what her claw and bite marks look like. And what does it matter, which the doctor is not contradicting herself about, and it's misogynistic of you to suggest that she is. And like one person in the chat I've been watching, it said she would like to see you go after the ARCA experts, but apparently you really are, but you probably speak with more respect to them. But now you're going to have to say that they're from the FBI or hired by the FBI. So, either you know something that the FBI is being told to stand down because of the change in administration, or you're just not concerned about your own reputation if even I, the paralegal in Tennessee now, can, can see the ineptitude of what you're saying. You know, I'm just disappointed even for you to let yourself appear stupid. Why are you all so afraid of these witnesses of yours? And now you can't call Brian Albert because I will personally bring it to the defense's attention, and I have their cell phone numbers, uh, of how he's contradicting himself. If he comes out and says anything other than that he let Chloe outran at that time, which would make it moot whether or not she attacked John O'Keefe's no frozen arm at 12:30 at night, um, or snow-covered arm supposedly. Uh, anyway, and I started out actually for the prosecution, but the evidence that was presented in just a reasonable doubt of every— anybody watching any one of your witnesses And I pray that Proctor comes forward. He was actually the only believable one after he started telling the truth, and now he's being used as a patsy for all the others, which they set him up to be. And I pray that he comes forward against the Commonwealth.
5:01

What an interesting voicemail left for Hank Brennan during the Karen Read trial from a former DOJ paralaegal! Transcript: Hi, Mr. Brennan, if this is your voicemail, you're not listed in the select by name directory, understandably, but especially now. You know, I'm a former paralegal at DOJ, but now living in Tennessee, retired because of a disability. And I just have to say, I'm so disappointed in you. I left a message that was actually pleasant for Mr. Lally at the end of the other trial, because I felt like he was kind of being forced to turn a blind eye, and may even be trying to intentionally lose, because he deep down has his own suspicions. Um, you must, or you are really not watching the entirety of the previous trial, but I want you to know that what you're saying today is in direct contradiction to your own former witness Brian Albert's testimony, where he said he let Chloe out right at that time because he knew that some experts may deduce that they are dog bites. And that was leaving open the possibility that she attacked John's body outside where it wasn't even there yet. But, but at that time, you know, when they later said that Karen hit him, um, You must know that there's ample reasonable doubt or you wouldn't be going after expert witnesses. And just as a Christian, I am a, you know, fairly astute former paralegal, but also as a Christian, you know, uh, you know, you're going to have to answer to a higher power. And right now I would like to go with you to see Chloe since you did, she takes the beer out and say, sick of myself. For her to bite either D.A. Morrissey or you, but somehow I still don't feel like that way toward Mr. Lally. Um, and then you'll have a comparison of exactly what her claw and bite marks look like. And what does it matter, which the doctor is not contradicting herself about, and it's misogynistic of you to suggest that she is. And like one person in the chat I've been watching, it said she would like to see you go after the ARCA experts, but apparently you really are, but you probably speak with more respect to them. But now you're going to have to say that they're from the FBI or hired by the FBI. So, either you know something that the FBI is being told to stand down because of the change in administration, or you're just not concerned about your own reputation if even I, the paralegal in Tennessee now, can, can see the ineptitude of what you're saying. You know, I'm just disappointed even for you to let yourself appear stupid. Why are you all so afraid of these witnesses of yours? And now you can't call Brian Albert because I will personally bring it to the defense's attention, and I have their cell phone numbers, uh, of how he's contradicting himself. If he comes out and says anything other than that he let Chloe outran at that time, which would make it moot whether or not she attacked John O'Keefe's no frozen arm at 12:30 at night, um, or snow-covered arm supposedly. Uh, anyway, and I started out actually for the prosecution, but the evidence that was presented in just a reasonable doubt of every— anybody watching any one of your witnesses And I pray that Proctor comes forward. He was actually the only believable one after he started telling the truth, and now he's being used as a patsy for all the others, which they set him up to be. And I pray that he comes forward against the Commonwealth.

Grant Smith Ellis

31,315 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

Combat correspondent Michael Yon: "[The Covid jabs are] clearly... a deployment... of a weapon of mass destruction... [But] Trump is still pushing it. [And people with] TDS are [those] that still support Trump in 2026... That is the power of mind control, and there is zero they will not do, and I mean zero." This clip of Yon (Michael Yon: Callsign BIG HONEY), who is also a photographer and author, is taken from a conversation with Liz Gunn (Liz Gunn) and Masako Ganaha (我那覇真子 Masako Ganaha) posted to the FreeNZ (FreeNZ) Rumble channel on January 11, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "It's clearly a weapon. They're showing one of several things, or potentially an overlap. But one would be either they just haven't researched it enough, or they're actually part of it, actually, because that was why they're using the wrong word. Or potentially they're a coward, because they're afraid to use the right word. That's actually cowardice. "And keep in mind, words are the atomic structures of truth and lies. So if you pick the wrong word from the beginning, all the rest of what you're talking about is irrelevant because you're talking about— You started with the wrong word. It's like, you know, started to try to make water out of, instead of using H2O, instead of using hydrogen and oxygen, used, lithium and sulfur or something, you know, it's just not going to work well. Well, you know, it's like, yeah, but. No, but this is water. You know, it's like, actually, it's just not, you know, and if you're talking about this as a vaccine or migration, when it's clearly an invasion, clearly weaponized migration at minimum. "But it's been being used. Used as a weapon in war, since it's being used as a weapon in war, remember, I mean, this flashlight is a weapon if you hit somebody with it. So what is a weapon? A weapon is something that you use as a weapon. And there are some things that are designed to be meant to be used as a weapon. This is meant to be used as a light. "But what is a weapon? I mean, if you end up in a courtroom because of a use of a weapon, then they're going to say, yeah, that, that, that spoon was a weapon, you know, but, but, but some are actually designed as WMD. And clearly this was a deployment and employment of a weapon of mass destruction. And Trump is still pushing it. He's still pushing it. "In his cult, keep in mind the highest, they've got severe. There's a lot of severe TDS going on. They call it Trump Derangement syndrome. That's— The TDS are the people that still support Trump in 2026. Despite that, he still put— Mary Bowden, she just said on an interview a couple days ago that. I thought she said 5.5 million children took it again last year, but it might have been 5.8. But anyway, over 5 million. "That much is clear, that Dr. Bowden said more than 5 million children have taken the jab just in the last year. Right. So if her numbers are accurate, even if it's 10 children. I mean, he's still not backing off of it. He's clearly using the weapon to destroy the United States. And so never underestimate the power of information, war and psychological operations specifically. There's people who literally, they have dead family members and they're sick and they still support the guy who's doing it. That is the power of mind control. It is absolutely severe. People with that level of mind control, there is absolutely zero they will not do, and I mean zero."
3:00

Combat correspondent Michael Yon: "[The Covid jabs are] clearly... a deployment... of a weapon of mass destruction... [But] Trump is still pushing it. [And people with] TDS are [those] that still support Trump in 2026... That is the power of mind control, and there is zero they will not do, and I mean zero." This clip of Yon (Michael Yon: Callsign BIG HONEY), who is also a photographer and author, is taken from a conversation with Liz Gunn (Liz Gunn) and Masako Ganaha (我那覇真子 Masako Ganaha) posted to the FreeNZ (FreeNZ) Rumble channel on January 11, 2026. ----------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "It's clearly a weapon. They're showing one of several things, or potentially an overlap. But one would be either they just haven't researched it enough, or they're actually part of it, actually, because that was why they're using the wrong word. Or potentially they're a coward, because they're afraid to use the right word. That's actually cowardice. "And keep in mind, words are the atomic structures of truth and lies. So if you pick the wrong word from the beginning, all the rest of what you're talking about is irrelevant because you're talking about— You started with the wrong word. It's like, you know, started to try to make water out of, instead of using H2O, instead of using hydrogen and oxygen, used, lithium and sulfur or something, you know, it's just not going to work well. Well, you know, it's like, yeah, but. No, but this is water. You know, it's like, actually, it's just not, you know, and if you're talking about this as a vaccine or migration, when it's clearly an invasion, clearly weaponized migration at minimum. "But it's been being used. Used as a weapon in war, since it's being used as a weapon in war, remember, I mean, this flashlight is a weapon if you hit somebody with it. So what is a weapon? A weapon is something that you use as a weapon. And there are some things that are designed to be meant to be used as a weapon. This is meant to be used as a light. "But what is a weapon? I mean, if you end up in a courtroom because of a use of a weapon, then they're going to say, yeah, that, that, that spoon was a weapon, you know, but, but, but some are actually designed as WMD. And clearly this was a deployment and employment of a weapon of mass destruction. And Trump is still pushing it. He's still pushing it. "In his cult, keep in mind the highest, they've got severe. There's a lot of severe TDS going on. They call it Trump Derangement syndrome. That's— The TDS are the people that still support Trump in 2026. Despite that, he still put— Mary Bowden, she just said on an interview a couple days ago that. I thought she said 5.5 million children took it again last year, but it might have been 5.8. But anyway, over 5 million. "That much is clear, that Dr. Bowden said more than 5 million children have taken the jab just in the last year. Right. So if her numbers are accurate, even if it's 10 children. I mean, he's still not backing off of it. He's clearly using the weapon to destroy the United States. And so never underestimate the power of information, war and psychological operations specifically. There's people who literally, they have dead family members and they're sick and they still support the guy who's doing it. That is the power of mind control. It is absolutely severe. People with that level of mind control, there is absolutely zero they will not do, and I mean zero."

Sense Receptor

35,397 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад

Martin Lewis, founder of MoneySavingExpert. com, on the four things it takes to be really successful, and why the most important one isn't what you'd expect: He opens with a clear framework: "It takes four things to be really successful. Talent, you've all got it, as do many more people than you think. Hard work. If you want to be really successful, you're going to have to work hard. Focus. Zone in on what you're good at." On focus, he pushes back against the idea that you need to be exceptional at everything: "Understand, none of us are unfailingly brilliant at everything. So, find the thing that you're good at and zone in on that. And that is what will create your success." But the fourth factor is where his message turns unexpected: "The most important thing is luck. You can do everything right, but it still not work for you. And you need to know that now." This reframes how he wants people to think about setbacks: "Failing does not make you a failure. Do not judge yourself. See it as a way to learn and to give yourself a better opportunity the next time." Martin Lewis then challenges a common assumption about what success actually delivers: "Success can be stressful. Success is not a synonym for happiness. As you go through your working careers, at sometimes you may want to make a call. Do I continue to push that hard or do I smile at what I've got and enjoy happiness and the other things that life starts to give me?" He closes with a message aimed at those who do make it big: "One or two of you in here will make it really big. If that's you, remember of those four things, the most important one is luck. And that means if you're that super successful one in the room, you have a moral duty to give back."
1:49

Martin Lewis, founder of MoneySavingExpert. com, on the four things it takes to be really successful, and why the most important one isn't what you'd expect: He opens with a clear framework: "It takes four things to be really successful. Talent, you've all got it, as do many more people than you think. Hard work. If you want to be really successful, you're going to have to work hard. Focus. Zone in on what you're good at." On focus, he pushes back against the idea that you need to be exceptional at everything: "Understand, none of us are unfailingly brilliant at everything. So, find the thing that you're good at and zone in on that. And that is what will create your success." But the fourth factor is where his message turns unexpected: "The most important thing is luck. You can do everything right, but it still not work for you. And you need to know that now." This reframes how he wants people to think about setbacks: "Failing does not make you a failure. Do not judge yourself. See it as a way to learn and to give yourself a better opportunity the next time." Martin Lewis then challenges a common assumption about what success actually delivers: "Success can be stressful. Success is not a synonym for happiness. As you go through your working careers, at sometimes you may want to make a call. Do I continue to push that hard or do I smile at what I've got and enjoy happiness and the other things that life starts to give me?" He closes with a message aimed at those who do make it big: "One or two of you in here will make it really big. If that's you, remember of those four things, the most important one is luck. And that means if you're that super successful one in the room, you have a moral duty to give back."

Big Brain Business

292,293 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад