Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

There was a problem loading this video. This could be due to a temporary network issue or the video might be unavailable.

That cgi on the bullet split was perfect

PEAK

1,118,814 subscribers

59,524 views • 5 months ago •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Comments

No comments available

Comments from the original post will appear here

Related Videos

Was the late 90’s the perfect blend of CGI and practical effects?

Was the late 90’s the perfect blend of CGI and practical effects?

Project Big Screen

17,797 views • 1 month ago

The cgi on Steppenwolf was genuinely impressive.

The cgi on Steppenwolf was genuinely impressive.

Daniel Dami Biu

31,668 views • 10 months ago

The fact that they added the detail of the bullet arriving before the sound of the shot is perfect

The fact that they added the detail of the bullet arriving before the sound of the shot is perfect

Unique Movie Moments 🐬

84,520 views • 5 months ago

The opening chase scene was filmed on an actual train. No CGI was used.

The opening chase scene was filmed on an actual train. No CGI was used.

Every Movie Plug

25,253 views • 5 months ago

The Daily Mail still hasn’t updated its headline: “Bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did NOT match rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson, new court filing claims” They should be ashamed of themselves. An earlier case filing cites the ATF’s finding on the bullet: “The result of the comparison was inconclusive.” If there's an “inconclusive” result, it does not mean that the bullet was not fired from that rifle. It means that there was not enough data on the bullet jacket fragment recovered from the autopsy to positively match it or not match it with a bullet test-fired from the rifle. That's ALL it means.

The Daily Mail still hasn’t updated its headline: “Bullet used to kill Charlie Kirk did NOT match rifle allegedly used by suspect Tyler Robinson, new court filing claims” They should be ashamed of themselves. An earlier case filing cites the ATF’s finding on the bullet: “The result of the comparison was inconclusive.” If there's an “inconclusive” result, it does not mean that the bullet was not fired from that rifle. It means that there was not enough data on the bullet jacket fragment recovered from the autopsy to positively match it or not match it with a bullet test-fired from the rifle. That's ALL it means.

Liz Wheeler

19,316 views • 5 months ago

The opposite of Ultraman's typical "wait that wasn't CGI?!" Ultraman Omega's opening scene was entirely CGI, including Omega himself. This time Tsuburaya Production gave us a very highly detailed CGI fight scene.

The opposite of Ultraman's typical "wait that wasn't CGI?!" Ultraman Omega's opening scene was entirely CGI, including Omega himself. This time Tsuburaya Production gave us a very highly detailed CGI fight scene.

Zang 🍓 Berries = 座んGうベrRィい図

82,203 views • 3 months ago

This Took Three years to Finish: 🧙‍♂️ What if Attack on Titan was CGI? And there was a full workshop on how we made it? "No CGI seems to be the trend now in big Hollywood movies. But they don't understand that CGI is not the bad guy here." ALSO, no AI used in this Project. Fu*k that! Stay awesome folks. <3 for a like and share.

This Took Three years to Finish: 🧙‍♂️ What if Attack on Titan was CGI? And there was a full workshop on how we made it? "No CGI seems to be the trend now in big Hollywood movies. But they don't understand that CGI is not the bad guy here." ALSO, no AI used in this Project. Fu*k that! Stay awesome folks. <3 for a like and share.

U R B A N - B | Explosions Guy

150,404 views • 2 years ago

🎥 BOMBSHELL FOOTAGE: No bullet exited Charlie’s body from the back ⚠️ If the bullet was shot from that angle and was still in his body, “The feds would have known that” 🚨 SO WHY DID THEY SAY THEY WERE LOOKING FOR A BULLET⁉️

🎥 BOMBSHELL FOOTAGE: No bullet exited Charlie’s body from the back ⚠️ If the bullet was shot from that angle and was still in his body, “The feds would have known that” 🚨 SO WHY DID THEY SAY THEY WERE LOOKING FOR A BULLET⁉️

Matt Wallace

232,645 views • 1 year ago

🚨BREAKING: .30-caliber bullet fragments recovered during Charlie Kirk's autopsy. "Did you measure the diameter of the bullet?" "Yes." "What was your reading?" ".286 to .301 inches." "Based on the class characteristics, what weapons could have fired the bullet?" "There were several different .30 caliber class firearms that could have fired the bullet."

🚨BREAKING: .30-caliber bullet fragments recovered during Charlie Kirk's autopsy. "Did you measure the diameter of the bullet?" "Yes." "What was your reading?" ".286 to .301 inches." "Based on the class characteristics, what weapons could have fired the bullet?" "There were several different .30 caliber class firearms that could have fired the bullet."

KanekoaTheGreat

273,549 views • 2 months ago

Now, they’re saying that the entire rescue mission was fake and generated using CGI. 🤡

Now, they’re saying that the entire rescue mission was fake and generated using CGI. 🤡

DogeDesigner

485,660 views • 1 year ago

Candace on Tuesday: “My source who’s close to the Robinson family told me that that family heirloom gun takes special bullets.” Candace in December admitting it was a special bullet that was used to murder Charlie: “It was likely a frangible bullet, a SPECIALIZED ammunition that is designed to disintegrate into powder upon impact.”

Candace on Tuesday: “My source who’s close to the Robinson family told me that that family heirloom gun takes special bullets.” Candace in December admitting it was a special bullet that was used to murder Charlie: “It was likely a frangible bullet, a SPECIALIZED ammunition that is designed to disintegrate into powder upon impact.”

Natalie Jean Beisner

39,839 views • 5 months ago

“the cgi was bad” “the villain was terrible” how about we focus more on what the film is actually about?

“the cgi was bad” “the villain was terrible” how about we focus more on what the film is actually about?

fae ⊹✧⋆

135,325 views • 2 days ago

That NO was faster than a bullet

That NO was faster than a bullet

Mageba

2,426,787 views • 1 year ago

Bullet proof glass was all that was needed to protect employees from the community they serve.

Bullet proof glass was all that was needed to protect employees from the community they serve.

Dane

241,155 views • 1 year ago

THE 2003 HULK WAS SO STRONG THAT HIS SKIN WAS THICK, NO BULLET COULD PENETRATE 😳

THE 2003 HULK WAS SO STRONG THAT HIS SKIN WAS THICK, NO BULLET COULD PENETRATE 😳

360waves

100,606 views • 1 month ago

Tyler Robinson Defense points out that a Bullet was found on a Separate building, Officer Claimed it was his—but the scene wasn’t Secured Defense: “Wasn’t there also a bullet found on another building?” Witness: I believe an unfired bullet has been found on another building Defense: Which building? Witness: I don’t recall Defense: Did you preserve that scene? Witness: No, my recollection is that was accounted for as an ejected cartridge from an officer who had cycled his rifle Defense: I thought you said it was an unformed bullet, now it was a cartridge? Witness: When a weapon is cleared he would make his rifle ready which would chamber a round. My understanding is that’s how that was accounted for. Defense: An officer claimed that bullet belonged to him? Witness: That’s my recollection Defense: When was that accounted for? Do you remember what type of bullet it was? Was it a .30-06? Do you know where that bullet is now? Witness: I don’t know.. I don’t.. I don’t.

Tyler Robinson Defense points out that a Bullet was found on a Separate building, Officer Claimed it was his—but the scene wasn’t Secured Defense: “Wasn’t there also a bullet found on another building?” Witness: I believe an unfired bullet has been found on another building Defense: Which building? Witness: I don’t recall Defense: Did you preserve that scene? Witness: No, my recollection is that was accounted for as an ejected cartridge from an officer who had cycled his rifle Defense: I thought you said it was an unformed bullet, now it was a cartridge? Witness: When a weapon is cleared he would make his rifle ready which would chamber a round. My understanding is that’s how that was accounted for. Defense: An officer claimed that bullet belonged to him? Witness: That’s my recollection Defense: When was that accounted for? Do you remember what type of bullet it was? Was it a .30-06? Do you know where that bullet is now? Witness: I don’t know.. I don’t.. I don’t.

MJTruthUltra

466,696 views • 2 months ago

“You don't need the bullet to find someone guilty of firing the bullet…” Andrew Branca Show and Mark Geragos on whether it matters legally that the ATF couldn't identify the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk. Watch below, and subscribe:

“You don't need the bullet to find someone guilty of firing the bullet…” Andrew Branca Show and Mark Geragos on whether it matters legally that the ATF couldn't identify the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk. Watch below, and subscribe:

The Megyn Kelly Show

25,914 views • 5 months ago