正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

That's genius.

chaotic memes

2,313,066 subscribers

1,346,822 次观看 • 5 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

喜剧艺术新闻政治

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Ok, that's genius.

Ok, that's genius.

Community Notes & Violations

57,215 次观看 • 11 个月前

A safe box made from LEGO? that's actually genius 😱

A safe box made from LEGO? that's actually genius 😱

𝙍𝙖𝙮.

79,405 次观看 • 2 个月前

Two hitmen talking about French McDonald's right before work. that's the genius of Tarantino.

Two hitmen talking about French McDonald's right before work. that's the genius of Tarantino.

Quentin Tarantino Universe

14,969 次观看 • 3 个月前

Victoria Beckham talks about rhode's lip case: 'That's pretty genius, I would love to have thought about that'.

Victoria Beckham talks about rhode's lip case: 'That's pretty genius, I would love to have thought about that'.

Hailey Bieber Outfits

24,882 次观看 • 3 个月前

Some users are struggling when trying to bridge tokens. That's because there's no such thing as "bridging tokens" on Genius. Our "swap" functionality allows instant swaps from any chain to any chain. 👇

Some users are struggling when trying to bridge tokens. That's because there's no such thing as "bridging tokens" on Genius. Our "swap" functionality allows instant swaps from any chain to any chain. 👇

Genius

137,029 次观看 • 7 个月前

Trump: “I just give you a little bit of a thing and by the way, the press will say, oh, he rambled, no, that's not ramble, you know what that is? That was genius, that's the weave, now, see, I, I wove frankly the rest of it I don't really even have to talk about, but that was the ultimate weave”

Trump: “I just give you a little bit of a thing and by the way, the press will say, oh, he rambled, no, that's not ramble, you know what that is? That was genius, that's the weave, now, see, I, I wove frankly the rest of it I don't really even have to talk about, but that was the ultimate weave”

Republicans against Trump

222,615 次观看 • 1 年前

Nah son THIS app is genius 😭 Literally a boxing app made with AR Bro pulled in 6.3M views Just screen recording the app I said it before and I'll say it again Add visual features to your apps That's how you blow up

Nah son THIS app is genius 😭 Literally a boxing app made with AR Bro pulled in 6.3M views Just screen recording the app I said it before and I'll say it again Add visual features to your apps That's how you blow up

Ernesto Lopez

156,597 次观看 • 4 个月前

🍊: the director complimented my acting 🍓: nah he wasn't talking about you, it's me 🍊: but basically i did everything, he just sat there with his arm held out 🍓: but that's the most important part, facial expressions. 🍓: juju kept saying "i think im an acting genius" 😁

🍊: the director complimented my acting 🍓: nah he wasn't talking about you, it's me 🍊: but basically i did everything, he just sat there with his arm held out 🍓: but that's the most important part, facial expressions. 🍓: juju kept saying "i think im an acting genius" 😁

𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗵𝗼𝗷𝗼𝗼

19,623 次观看 • 29 天前

Reminder that trade genius Howard Lutnick BELIEVED CANADA DIDN’T HAVE UNIONS. He actually said that. And he claimed that's why auto mfrs "moved" there. (Canada has: ✅always had a huge auto industry, and ✅yes has unions.) THIS is the mental wattage working on Canada-US trade👇

Reminder that trade genius Howard Lutnick BELIEVED CANADA DIDN’T HAVE UNIONS. He actually said that. And he claimed that's why auto mfrs "moved" there. (Canada has: ✅always had a huge auto industry, and ✅yes has unions.) THIS is the mental wattage working on Canada-US trade👇

Joel Lawson

550,777 次观看 • 15 天前

Trump sounds incomprehensible right now “So I just give you a little bit of a thing and by the way, the press will say, oh, he rambled, no, that's not ramble, you know what that is? That was genius, that's the weave, now, see, I, I wove frankly the rest of it I don't really even have to talk about, but that was the ultimate weave and, and think of it”

Trump sounds incomprehensible right now “So I just give you a little bit of a thing and by the way, the press will say, oh, he rambled, no, that's not ramble, you know what that is? That was genius, that's the weave, now, see, I, I wove frankly the rest of it I don't really even have to talk about, but that was the ultimate weave and, and think of it”

Headquarters

743,427 次观看 • 1 年前

when BTS wrote out that looping phrase: “You know how I do, do, do, do, do, do,” : your brain hears the English word for getting things done, your ears instantly trip up. It sounds exactly like 둘 (dul), which is just the number 'two.' You know how I, DO (Chapter 2), DO (Chapter 2), DO (Chapter 2), DO (Chapter 2), DO (Chapter 2) the genius of this album is how it gives listeners the raw, heavy injection of BTS’s Korean roots they were starving for, but without feeling like a dry history lesson. that's how you make clever music that answers 'doubts'.

when BTS wrote out that looping phrase: “You know how I do, do, do, do, do, do,” : your brain hears the English word for getting things done, your ears instantly trip up. It sounds exactly like 둘 (dul), which is just the number 'two.' You know how I, DO (Chapter 2), DO (Chapter 2), DO (Chapter 2), DO (Chapter 2), DO (Chapter 2) the genius of this album is how it gives listeners the raw, heavy injection of BTS’s Korean roots they were starving for, but without feeling like a dry history lesson. that's how you make clever music that answers 'doubts'.

ruz 𓍯

13,984 次观看 • 2 个月前

the model in that clip has no good signal in it. it still put up +17% against the index's +5% the formula is doing the work R(t) = (Rmax / 7) · Σ s_i(t) seven separate signals, each scored, averaged into one number that's the entire model. no genius indicator anywhere in it and that's the part retail keeps missing retail hunts for the one signal that works a desk assumes every individual signal is weak and builds around that assumption here's why that assumption wins take N signals, each with sharpe s, and average them if they're uncorrelated, the combined sharpe is: s · √N seven weak signals at sharpe 0.3 each 0.3 × √7 = 0.79 nothing in that stack survives a backtest alone. together they clear the bar the noise in each signal is independent, so averaging cancels it the edge in each points the same way, so averaging keeps it that asymmetry is the whole mechanism but there's a catch, and it's the one that kills retail attempts correlation. the real formula is: s · √( N / (1 + (N−1)ρ) ) at ρ = 0.5 those same seven signals give: 0.3 × √(7 / 4) = 0.40 half the benefit, gone seven versions of momentum with different lookbacks aren't seven signals. they're one signal, repeated so the search isn't for better signals it's for signals that are wrong at different times grinold formalized this in 1989. the fundamental law of active management: IR = IC × √breadth skill per bet times the square root of how many independent bets you take you can be barely right, as long as you're barely right about many uncorrelated things renaissance doesn't run one model. it runs thousands of weak ones that's not a compromise. that's the design retail asks "is this signal good enough to trade" a desk asks "what does this add that i don't already have" the math is public. grinold's paper, every portfolio theory textbook the correlation matrix that tells you whether your signals are actually distinct is three lines of python they weren't finding better signals they were finding signals that disagree full breakdown in the article below

the model in that clip has no good signal in it. it still put up +17% against the index's +5% the formula is doing the work R(t) = (Rmax / 7) · Σ s_i(t) seven separate signals, each scored, averaged into one number that's the entire model. no genius indicator anywhere in it and that's the part retail keeps missing retail hunts for the one signal that works a desk assumes every individual signal is weak and builds around that assumption here's why that assumption wins take N signals, each with sharpe s, and average them if they're uncorrelated, the combined sharpe is: s · √N seven weak signals at sharpe 0.3 each 0.3 × √7 = 0.79 nothing in that stack survives a backtest alone. together they clear the bar the noise in each signal is independent, so averaging cancels it the edge in each points the same way, so averaging keeps it that asymmetry is the whole mechanism but there's a catch, and it's the one that kills retail attempts correlation. the real formula is: s · √( N / (1 + (N−1)ρ) ) at ρ = 0.5 those same seven signals give: 0.3 × √(7 / 4) = 0.40 half the benefit, gone seven versions of momentum with different lookbacks aren't seven signals. they're one signal, repeated so the search isn't for better signals it's for signals that are wrong at different times grinold formalized this in 1989. the fundamental law of active management: IR = IC × √breadth skill per bet times the square root of how many independent bets you take you can be barely right, as long as you're barely right about many uncorrelated things renaissance doesn't run one model. it runs thousands of weak ones that's not a compromise. that's the design retail asks "is this signal good enough to trade" a desk asks "what does this add that i don't already have" the math is public. grinold's paper, every portfolio theory textbook the correlation matrix that tells you whether your signals are actually distinct is three lines of python they weren't finding better signals they were finding signals that disagree full breakdown in the article below

delost

28,032 次观看 • 1 个月前

bro these people are making $115k/month selling google sheets to women found this brand called "smart women society" and honestly it's genius. took the same budgeting/planner products everyone sells but went ALL IN on one angle women empowerment and built an entire brand around it. 64+ ads running for 5+ months straight. same spreadsheets you've seen everywhere, just completely repositioned for women specifically. that's literally the only difference. and they're not selling just one product they got 24 different products testing different pain points within the same audience. career planners, travel planners, budgeting tools, relationship guides, self-care stuff... all targeting the same woman, just different problems. their ads? mostly video testimonials + simple videos of the spreadsheet on a laptop with text overlays. and some static image ads testing different hooks like "the best budgeting tool I've ever used" basic stuff but it works. this is what I keep saying the product almost doesn't matter. it's about finding YOUR angle and going deep with one audience. these are literally google sheets and notion templates but they wrapped it in the right positioning and now they're printing $115k/month.

Xivy

86,070 次观看 • 7 个月前

SHADOWS OF SABOTAGE: ELON'S DEFIANT STAND A chilling moment where genius meets grit. "I'm not someone who's ever committed violence. Um, and yet, uh, massive violence was committed against my companies. Massive violence was threatened against me. Who are these people? Why would they do that? How wrong can they be? They're on the wrong side of history. And that's an evil thing to do." - ELON MUSK This moment captures Elon’s passion in the face of turbulence— a powerful reminder of how deeply leadership intersects with the world around us. It highlights the human side of a visionary, revealing the weight carried by those pushing civilization forward. Instead of aggression, it invites reflection: in a time where technology and imagination shape our shared destiny, what does it mean to stand for progress? Philosophically, it becomes a conversation about innovation, courage, and the people willing to step into the unknown. Emotionally, it reads as the voice of someone who has built extraordinary things and continues to protect the future they’re creating—for all of us. Source: Elon Musk interview with Mishal Husain, May 20, 2025 — Topic: Violence against Tesla amid political backlash.

SHADOWS OF SABOTAGE: ELON'S DEFIANT STAND A chilling moment where genius meets grit. "I'm not someone who's ever committed violence. Um, and yet, uh, massive violence was committed against my companies. Massive violence was threatened against me. Who are these people? Why would they do that? How wrong can they be? They're on the wrong side of history. And that's an evil thing to do." - ELON MUSK This moment captures Elon’s passion in the face of turbulence— a powerful reminder of how deeply leadership intersects with the world around us. It highlights the human side of a visionary, revealing the weight carried by those pushing civilization forward. Instead of aggression, it invites reflection: in a time where technology and imagination shape our shared destiny, what does it mean to stand for progress? Philosophically, it becomes a conversation about innovation, courage, and the people willing to step into the unknown. Emotionally, it reads as the voice of someone who has built extraordinary things and continues to protect the future they’re creating—for all of us. Source: Elon Musk interview with Mishal Husain, May 20, 2025 — Topic: Violence against Tesla amid political backlash.

Lacey

40,288 次观看 • 9 个月前

Agge shame, you pathetic race-baiting grievance merchant, dredging up apartheid ghosts from over three decades ago like a jilted and bitter ex who can't move on. Brilliant observation, you racist you. "The sand is African sand," genius. Next you'll tell us the ocean is wet and the sky is blue. Newsflash‼️ Those "WHITES ONLY" signs came down in 1989, before most of your TikTok warriors were even born. Beaches have been open to everyone since then, but you do you, and keep pretending it's 1953 to fuel your victim drama. "Go in numbers. Occupy the scenery. Fill the frame." Translation: Swarm the beaches like locusts, blast your vuvuzelas and boomboxes at max volume, scatter your rubbish everywhere, and turn paradise into a chaotic township picnic, boozing and crapping all over the place, all while calling it "revolutionary." Your "joy" is everyone else's nightmare; overcrowded, littered, noisy hellholes where families can't relax because entitled mobs think "reclaiming" means ruining it for others. We've seen it all. Pristine spots trashed, crime spiking, locals fleeing. That's not power; that's just being the asshole at the party no one invited. "Land that was stolen?" Aaaaah, again with the selective history lesson. Meanwhile, under black governance for 30+ years, beaches are filthier than ever thanks to ANC/EFF incompetence; sewage spills closing Durban spots, E. coli nightmares because your leaders can't fix basic infrastructure. But nah, blame "white racists" hiding under the sand dunes. Real South Africans just want clean, safe beaches without your dramatic invasions turning them into no-go zones. Your "revolution" is just entitlement wrapped in resentment, and it's as boring as your recycled slogans.

Agge shame, you pathetic race-baiting grievance merchant, dredging up apartheid ghosts from over three decades ago like a jilted and bitter ex who can't move on. Brilliant observation, you racist you. "The sand is African sand," genius. Next you'll tell us the ocean is wet and the sky is blue. Newsflash‼️ Those "WHITES ONLY" signs came down in 1989, before most of your TikTok warriors were even born. Beaches have been open to everyone since then, but you do you, and keep pretending it's 1953 to fuel your victim drama. "Go in numbers. Occupy the scenery. Fill the frame." Translation: Swarm the beaches like locusts, blast your vuvuzelas and boomboxes at max volume, scatter your rubbish everywhere, and turn paradise into a chaotic township picnic, boozing and crapping all over the place, all while calling it "revolutionary." Your "joy" is everyone else's nightmare; overcrowded, littered, noisy hellholes where families can't relax because entitled mobs think "reclaiming" means ruining it for others. We've seen it all. Pristine spots trashed, crime spiking, locals fleeing. That's not power; that's just being the asshole at the party no one invited. "Land that was stolen?" Aaaaah, again with the selective history lesson. Meanwhile, under black governance for 30+ years, beaches are filthier than ever thanks to ANC/EFF incompetence; sewage spills closing Durban spots, E. coli nightmares because your leaders can't fix basic infrastructure. But nah, blame "white racists" hiding under the sand dunes. Real South Africans just want clean, safe beaches without your dramatic invasions turning them into no-go zones. Your "revolution" is just entitlement wrapped in resentment, and it's as boring as your recycled slogans.

Alice VL

59,084 次观看 • 8 个月前

GTA 4 turns 18 today. The most ANNOYING game in the series. - Clunky driving - Stopping to pay bridge tolls - Failing to hail a cab in the rain - Sluggish internet cafes - Roman calling you 24/7 You called it bad design. But it was intentional. Modern games are terrified of frustrating you. They want you to feel like a god without any friction. But GTA 4 does the exact opposite. It constantly fights you. Take Roman. The "let's go bowling" meme is legendary because players hated it. But technically, it’s genius. It perfectly captures how exhausting it can be to deal with family responsibilities. You never really have any time that's just yours. Same goes for driving. Cars handle like boats. You can't just hold down the gas like you do in GTA 5. You have to respect the weight, brake early, and actually learn the streets. Rockstar used frustrating gameplay to put you directly in Niko’s shoes. The "American Dream" in GTA 4 isn’t a power fantasy playground, and you aren't a superhero in the city. You're just a stranger forced to adapt to it. When a game frustrates you, it's usually just bad design. But when GTA 4 makes you rage at a toll booth or sigh at a poorly-timed phone call, it’s doing exactly what it meant to. You're feeling what Niko feels. Did you like the realism, or do you wish it played more like GTA 5?

GTA 4 turns 18 today. The most ANNOYING game in the series. - Clunky driving - Stopping to pay bridge tolls - Failing to hail a cab in the rain - Sluggish internet cafes - Roman calling you 24/7 You called it bad design. But it was intentional. Modern games are terrified of frustrating you. They want you to feel like a god without any friction. But GTA 4 does the exact opposite. It constantly fights you. Take Roman. The "let's go bowling" meme is legendary because players hated it. But technically, it’s genius. It perfectly captures how exhausting it can be to deal with family responsibilities. You never really have any time that's just yours. Same goes for driving. Cars handle like boats. You can't just hold down the gas like you do in GTA 5. You have to respect the weight, brake early, and actually learn the streets. Rockstar used frustrating gameplay to put you directly in Niko’s shoes. The "American Dream" in GTA 4 isn’t a power fantasy playground, and you aren't a superhero in the city. You're just a stranger forced to adapt to it. When a game frustrates you, it's usually just bad design. But when GTA 4 makes you rage at a toll booth or sigh at a poorly-timed phone call, it’s doing exactly what it meant to. You're feeling what Niko feels. Did you like the realism, or do you wish it played more like GTA 5?

Rooster

601,708 次观看 • 4 个月前

🚨 THE NEXT MONETARY WAR BETWEEN THE U.S. AND CHINA HAS ALREADY STARTED THE U.S. IS BETTING ON DIGITAL DOLLARS (STABLECOINS) - CHINA IS BETTING ON PHYSICAL GOLD. Trump and the Treasury have now said the quiet part out loud. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent: "We will keep the dollar as the world's reserve currency and will use stablecoins to do it." Trump's January 2025 order put dollar-backed stablecoins at the center of U.S. policy. The GENIUS Act then formalized the structure: compliant stablecoins must be backed 1-for-1 by cash, T-bills, and Treasury repos. THAT'S THE KEY. AMERICA CAN'T PRINT GOLD. BUT IT CAN CREATE NEW DEMAND FOR ITS OWN DEBT. Here's how it works: Billions of people who may never open a U.S. bank account can still hold a digital dollar token. As stablecoin supply grows, issuers need more reserve assets - including short-term Treasuries. Dollar demand gets pushed onto crypto rails, helping extend the reach of the dollar beyond the traditional banking system. IT'S NOT A GOLD STANDARD. IT'S CLOSER TO A DIGITAL T-BILL STANDARD WRAPPED IN CRYPTO. Meanwhile, China is moving in the opposite direction. The PBOC just posted its 21st straight month of gold buying. Official holdings: ~2,366 tonnes. They're accumulating physical metal at a remarkable pace. Hong Kong has already opened the first offshore Shanghai Gold Exchange vault. The city is targeting 2,000+ tonnes of storage, while additional vault locations are being explored in Singapore, Dubai, Riyadh, and Moscow. The idea is simple: hold yuan, then convert it into gold that can actually be delivered. Physical collateral. Offshore vaults. Yuan-linked settlement backed by metal rather than promises. TWO DIFFERENT STRATEGIES. ONE BIG PROBLEM. At the same time, the London Metal Exchange's Treasury chief has moved to a crypto firm focused on tokenized commodities - while China continues building out a yuan-gold settlement network. ONE SIDE IS DIGITIZING THE DEBT - THE OTHER IS ACCUMULATING THE METAL. The real question is which system the rest of the world will trust more when the next major shock arrives!👀

🚨 THE NEXT MONETARY WAR BETWEEN THE U.S. AND CHINA HAS ALREADY STARTED THE U.S. IS BETTING ON DIGITAL DOLLARS (STABLECOINS) - CHINA IS BETTING ON PHYSICAL GOLD. Trump and the Treasury have now said the quiet part out loud. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent: "We will keep the dollar as the world's reserve currency and will use stablecoins to do it." Trump's January 2025 order put dollar-backed stablecoins at the center of U.S. policy. The GENIUS Act then formalized the structure: compliant stablecoins must be backed 1-for-1 by cash, T-bills, and Treasury repos. THAT'S THE KEY. AMERICA CAN'T PRINT GOLD. BUT IT CAN CREATE NEW DEMAND FOR ITS OWN DEBT. Here's how it works: Billions of people who may never open a U.S. bank account can still hold a digital dollar token. As stablecoin supply grows, issuers need more reserve assets - including short-term Treasuries. Dollar demand gets pushed onto crypto rails, helping extend the reach of the dollar beyond the traditional banking system. IT'S NOT A GOLD STANDARD. IT'S CLOSER TO A DIGITAL T-BILL STANDARD WRAPPED IN CRYPTO. Meanwhile, China is moving in the opposite direction. The PBOC just posted its 21st straight month of gold buying. Official holdings: ~2,366 tonnes. They're accumulating physical metal at a remarkable pace. Hong Kong has already opened the first offshore Shanghai Gold Exchange vault. The city is targeting 2,000+ tonnes of storage, while additional vault locations are being explored in Singapore, Dubai, Riyadh, and Moscow. The idea is simple: hold yuan, then convert it into gold that can actually be delivered. Physical collateral. Offshore vaults. Yuan-linked settlement backed by metal rather than promises. TWO DIFFERENT STRATEGIES. ONE BIG PROBLEM. At the same time, the London Metal Exchange's Treasury chief has moved to a crypto firm focused on tokenized commodities - while China continues building out a yuan-gold settlement network. ONE SIDE IS DIGITIZING THE DEBT - THE OTHER IS ACCUMULATING THE METAL. The real question is which system the rest of the world will trust more when the next major shock arrives!👀

DANNY

205,871 次观看 • 1 天前