Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

22,990 Aufrufe • vor 13 Stunden •via X (Twitter)

37 Kommentare

Profilbild von Ian
Ianvor 13 Stunden

Because the law has never been wrong before.

Profilbild von Aztriko
Aztrikovor 13 Stunden

Ain t this the same guy from another video? He sure has free time...

Profilbild von Matthew Duffy 🌳🪓
Matthew Duffy 🌳🪓vor 13 Stunden

What does he think of the three fifths compromise?

Profilbild von OrthoDad
OrthoDadvor 13 Stunden

First, "shall include" does not exclude prenatal children. Second, other statues apply as well. For example, in federal criminal law protects "a child, who is in utero." 18 usc 1841(a)(1) Whoever engages in conduct that violates any of the provisions of law listed in subsection (b) and thereby causes the death of, or bodily injury (as defined in section 1365) to, a child, who is in utero at the time the conduct takes place, is guilty of a separate offense under this section.

Profilbild von Joel: יוסף פנחס
Joel: יוסף פנחסvor 12 Stunden

This is the same guy that approached your other team member in a previous video. Are you using paid actors or friends to make these videos now?

Profilbild von Abolitionists Rising 🌳🪓
Abolitionists Rising 🌳🪓vor 12 Stunden

Lol no. This was the same night in Boulder Colorado. Dude was making his rounds.

Profilbild von Phone Poster
Phone Postervor 12 Stunden

Did you video him twice in the same day or did he not change his shirt??

Profilbild von Abolitionists Rising 🌳🪓
Abolitionists Rising 🌳🪓vor 12 Stunden

This was the same day. He was making his rounds.

Profilbild von Michael Cook
Michael Cookvor 13 Stunden

So if the law determines someone isn’t a person then we can kill them? I feel like there is some historical example we might point to…

Profilbild von Rashim Kalur
Rashim Kalurvor 13 Stunden

Oh its mr "master degree"

Profilbild von Murph
Murphvor 13 Stunden

Still can’t believe this dude thinks citing US law to an abolitionist position is convincing. Like what?

Profilbild von OrthoDad
OrthoDadvor 12 Stunden

What state was this in? 21 § 691 "As used in this section [defining homicide], “human being” includes an unborn child"

Profilbild von Alfredo Olazaba
Alfredo Olazabavor 13 Stunden

“Can you read this for the camera please?”

Profilbild von Logwell
Logwellvor 13 Stunden

I love her!

Profilbild von Eskimo Libertarian
Eskimo Libertarianvor 13 Stunden

Where did his t rex arms go?

Profilbild von Hrokemt
Hrokemtvor 13 Stunden

Bringing the law to justify morality is one of the most NPCs things you can do. That guy is obviously a moron.

Profilbild von BannedbyDrOakley1689 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
BannedbyDrOakley1689 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿vor 13 Stunden

Soy boy walking

Profilbild von Iblis
Iblisvor 12 Stunden

Ever looked at an actual law book? It's wild how much convoluted and unnecessary trash is in there, because it takes forever to change because the government in most countries are bloated and divided, which makes any meaningful changes snail paced.

Profilbild von Shuli Platinumstein-Goyimberg
Shuli Platinumstein-Goyimbergvor 12 Stunden

This 🄵🄰🄶🄶🄾🅃 reeks of ick

Profilbild von JP
JPvor 13 Stunden

They’re literally comedy characters, anything to defend baby murdering lmao. Subhumans.

Profilbild von ☩ KentleighE 🇬🇧✝ ☩
☩ KentleighE 🇬🇧✝ ☩vor 12 Stunden

Eyyy, it's dino-man.

Profilbild von What next
What nextvor 12 Stunden

If a pregnant woman is killed? Do they charge to person that did it with one murder or two??

Profilbild von Mello
Mellovor 13 Stunden

🤨 I’ve Never Wanted To Slap 👋 Someone So Much In My Entire Life. God Bless Your Ability To Stay Calm. These Evil Infested Followers Of Satan Will All Be Humbled When Facing Eternal Lake Of Fire 🔥 Consequences I Know I Shouldn’t Be This Petty But He Deserves It.

Profilbild von TheoWars Rob
TheoWars Robvor 13 Stunden

She’s getting better at the zingers lol

Profilbild von lego maker
lego makervor 12 Stunden

interesting how he demands she read something she does not agree with (and wants to change) but then refuses to... read something he does not agree with and wants to change...

Profilbild von Philip Sheppard
Philip Sheppardvor 12 Stunden

Does he know that slavery was once legal?

Profilbild von Louis
Louisvor 11 Stunden

Fallacy- appeal to law. That guy, by his own words, would support slavery because it was legal.

Profilbild von J A Stevens
J A Stevensvor 12 Stunden

That guy is something, second time I've seen him harass you guys.

Profilbild von Juan
Juanvor 12 Stunden

What a fruitcake, guy has zero testosterone.

Profilbild von Josh Lumley
Josh Lumleyvor 12 Stunden

The amount of estrogen this dude is giving off is off the charts.

Profilbild von ن Kristian Pearson ن
ن Kristian Pearson نvor 13 Stunden

Definitely Sweet Hot. Lol. I'm using that on my wife later!

Profilbild von 0xB01DFACE
0xB01DFACEvor 11 Stunden

Been watching more and more abolitionist videos. I'll always love Russell and his way of handling people - but I'm seeing more from his friends/colleagues. I don't know if I'm just stumbling on it or they're posting more... But she's another great one.

Profilbild von Pattie 🇺🇸
Pattie 🇺🇸vor 13 Stunden

That has to be a female

Profilbild von Mike Hunt 2
Mike Hunt 2vor 11 Stunden

How many times did this same guy do this exact same scenario??

Profilbild von James Kim
James Kimvor 11 Stunden

So he agreed with Jim Crow laws because they were laws.

Profilbild von BBQ Beer Freedom
BBQ Beer Freedomvor 12 Stunden

don't these people realize that slavery was legal?

Profilbild von Jordan2_o
Jordan2_ovor 9 Stunden

I love her 💪

Ähnliche Videos