Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

19,671 views • 10 hours ago •via X (Twitter)

37 Comments

Ian's profile picture
Ian10 hours ago

Because the law has never been wrong before.

Aztriko's profile picture
Aztriko10 hours ago

Ain t this the same guy from another video? He sure has free time...

Matthew Duffy 🌳🪓's profile picture
Matthew Duffy 🌳🪓10 hours ago

What does he think of the three fifths compromise?

OrthoDad's profile picture
OrthoDad10 hours ago

First, "shall include" does not exclude prenatal children. Second, other statues apply as well. For example, in federal criminal law protects "a child, who is in utero." 18 usc 1841(a)(1) Whoever engages in conduct that violates any of the provisions of law listed in subsection (b) and thereby causes the death of, or bodily injury (as defined in section 1365) to, a child, who is in utero at the time the conduct takes place, is guilty of a separate offense under this section.

Joel: יוסף פנחס's profile picture
Joel: יוסף פנחס9 hours ago

This is the same guy that approached your other team member in a previous video. Are you using paid actors or friends to make these videos now?

Abolitionists Rising 🌳🪓's profile picture
Abolitionists Rising 🌳🪓9 hours ago

Lol no. This was the same night in Boulder Colorado. Dude was making his rounds.

Phone Poster's profile picture
Phone Poster9 hours ago

Did you video him twice in the same day or did he not change his shirt??

Abolitionists Rising 🌳🪓's profile picture
Abolitionists Rising 🌳🪓9 hours ago

This was the same day. He was making his rounds.

Michael Cook's profile picture
Michael Cook10 hours ago

So if the law determines someone isn’t a person then we can kill them? I feel like there is some historical example we might point to…

Rashim Kalur's profile picture
Rashim Kalur10 hours ago

Oh its mr "master degree"

Murph's profile picture
Murph10 hours ago

Still can’t believe this dude thinks citing US law to an abolitionist position is convincing. Like what?

OrthoDad's profile picture
OrthoDad9 hours ago

What state was this in? 21 § 691 "As used in this section [defining homicide], “human being” includes an unborn child"

Alfredo Olazaba's profile picture
Alfredo Olazaba10 hours ago

“Can you read this for the camera please?”

Logwell's profile picture
Logwell10 hours ago

I love her!

Eskimo Libertarian's profile picture
Eskimo Libertarian10 hours ago

Where did his t rex arms go?

Hrokemt's profile picture
Hrokemt10 hours ago

Bringing the law to justify morality is one of the most NPCs things you can do. That guy is obviously a moron.

BannedbyDrOakley1689 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿's profile picture
BannedbyDrOakley1689 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿10 hours ago

Soy boy walking

Iblis's profile picture
Iblis9 hours ago

Ever looked at an actual law book? It's wild how much convoluted and unnecessary trash is in there, because it takes forever to change because the government in most countries are bloated and divided, which makes any meaningful changes snail paced.

Shuli Platinumstein-Goyimberg's profile picture
Shuli Platinumstein-Goyimberg9 hours ago

This 🄵🄰🄶🄶🄾🅃 reeks of ick

JP's profile picture
JP10 hours ago

They’re literally comedy characters, anything to defend baby murdering lmao. Subhumans.

☩ KentleighE 🇬🇧✝ ☩'s profile picture
☩ KentleighE 🇬🇧✝ ☩9 hours ago

Eyyy, it's dino-man.

What next's profile picture
What next9 hours ago

If a pregnant woman is killed? Do they charge to person that did it with one murder or two??

Mello's profile picture
Mello10 hours ago

🤨 I’ve Never Wanted To Slap 👋 Someone So Much In My Entire Life. God Bless Your Ability To Stay Calm. These Evil Infested Followers Of Satan Will All Be Humbled When Facing Eternal Lake Of Fire 🔥 Consequences I Know I Shouldn’t Be This Petty But He Deserves It.

TheoWars Rob's profile picture
TheoWars Rob10 hours ago

She’s getting better at the zingers lol

lego maker's profile picture
lego maker9 hours ago

interesting how he demands she read something she does not agree with (and wants to change) but then refuses to... read something he does not agree with and wants to change...

Philip Sheppard's profile picture
Philip Sheppard9 hours ago

Does he know that slavery was once legal?

Louis's profile picture
Louis8 hours ago

Fallacy- appeal to law. That guy, by his own words, would support slavery because it was legal.

J A Stevens's profile picture
J A Stevens9 hours ago

That guy is something, second time I've seen him harass you guys.

Juan's profile picture
Juan9 hours ago

What a fruitcake, guy has zero testosterone.

Josh Lumley's profile picture
Josh Lumley9 hours ago

The amount of estrogen this dude is giving off is off the charts.

ن Kristian Pearson ن's profile picture
ن Kristian Pearson ن10 hours ago

Definitely Sweet Hot. Lol. I'm using that on my wife later!

0xB01DFACE's profile picture
0xB01DFACE8 hours ago

Been watching more and more abolitionist videos. I'll always love Russell and his way of handling people - but I'm seeing more from his friends/colleagues. I don't know if I'm just stumbling on it or they're posting more... But she's another great one.

Pattie 🇺🇸's profile picture
Pattie 🇺🇸10 hours ago

That has to be a female

Mike Hunt 2's profile picture
Mike Hunt 28 hours ago

How many times did this same guy do this exact same scenario??

James Kim's profile picture
James Kim8 hours ago

So he agreed with Jim Crow laws because they were laws.

BBQ Beer Freedom's profile picture
BBQ Beer Freedom9 hours ago

don't these people realize that slavery was legal?

Jordan2_o's profile picture
Jordan2_o6 hours ago

I love her 💪

Related Videos