Sensitive content

This media may contain sensitive content.

Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

That's just like, your opinion

19,671 просмотров • 10 часов назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 37

Фото профиля Ian
Ian10 часов назад

Because the law has never been wrong before.

Фото профиля Aztriko
Aztriko10 часов назад

Ain t this the same guy from another video? He sure has free time...

Фото профиля Matthew Duffy 🌳🪓
Matthew Duffy 🌳🪓10 часов назад

What does he think of the three fifths compromise?

Фото профиля OrthoDad
OrthoDad10 часов назад

First, "shall include" does not exclude prenatal children. Second, other statues apply as well. For example, in federal criminal law protects "a child, who is in utero." 18 usc 1841(a)(1) Whoever engages in conduct that violates any of the provisions of law listed in subsection (b) and thereby causes the death of, or bodily injury (as defined in section 1365) to, a child, who is in utero at the time the conduct takes place, is guilty of a separate offense under this section.

Фото профиля Joel: יוסף פנחס
Joel: יוסף פנחס9 часов назад

This is the same guy that approached your other team member in a previous video. Are you using paid actors or friends to make these videos now?

Фото профиля Abolitionists Rising 🌳🪓
Abolitionists Rising 🌳🪓9 часов назад

Lol no. This was the same night in Boulder Colorado. Dude was making his rounds.

Фото профиля Phone Poster
Phone Poster9 часов назад

Did you video him twice in the same day or did he not change his shirt??

Фото профиля Abolitionists Rising 🌳🪓
Abolitionists Rising 🌳🪓9 часов назад

This was the same day. He was making his rounds.

Фото профиля Michael Cook
Michael Cook10 часов назад

So if the law determines someone isn’t a person then we can kill them? I feel like there is some historical example we might point to…

Фото профиля Rashim Kalur
Rashim Kalur10 часов назад

Oh its mr "master degree"

Фото профиля Murph
Murph10 часов назад

Still can’t believe this dude thinks citing US law to an abolitionist position is convincing. Like what?

Фото профиля OrthoDad
OrthoDad9 часов назад

What state was this in? 21 § 691 "As used in this section [defining homicide], “human being” includes an unborn child"

Фото профиля Alfredo Olazaba
Alfredo Olazaba10 часов назад

“Can you read this for the camera please?”

Фото профиля Logwell
Logwell10 часов назад

I love her!

Фото профиля Eskimo Libertarian
Eskimo Libertarian10 часов назад

Where did his t rex arms go?

Фото профиля Hrokemt
Hrokemt10 часов назад

Bringing the law to justify morality is one of the most NPCs things you can do. That guy is obviously a moron.

Фото профиля BannedbyDrOakley1689 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
BannedbyDrOakley1689 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿10 часов назад

Soy boy walking

Фото профиля Iblis
Iblis9 часов назад

Ever looked at an actual law book? It's wild how much convoluted and unnecessary trash is in there, because it takes forever to change because the government in most countries are bloated and divided, which makes any meaningful changes snail paced.

Фото профиля Shuli Platinumstein-Goyimberg
Shuli Platinumstein-Goyimberg9 часов назад

This 🄵🄰🄶🄶🄾🅃 reeks of ick

Фото профиля JP
JP10 часов назад

They’re literally comedy characters, anything to defend baby murdering lmao. Subhumans.

Фото профиля ☩ KentleighE 🇬🇧✝ ☩
☩ KentleighE 🇬🇧✝ ☩9 часов назад

Eyyy, it's dino-man.

Фото профиля What next
What next9 часов назад

If a pregnant woman is killed? Do they charge to person that did it with one murder or two??

Фото профиля Mello
Mello10 часов назад

🤨 I’ve Never Wanted To Slap 👋 Someone So Much In My Entire Life. God Bless Your Ability To Stay Calm. These Evil Infested Followers Of Satan Will All Be Humbled When Facing Eternal Lake Of Fire 🔥 Consequences I Know I Shouldn’t Be This Petty But He Deserves It.

Фото профиля TheoWars Rob
TheoWars Rob10 часов назад

She’s getting better at the zingers lol

Фото профиля lego maker
lego maker9 часов назад

interesting how he demands she read something she does not agree with (and wants to change) but then refuses to... read something he does not agree with and wants to change...

Фото профиля Philip Sheppard
Philip Sheppard9 часов назад

Does he know that slavery was once legal?

Фото профиля Louis
Louis8 часов назад

Fallacy- appeal to law. That guy, by his own words, would support slavery because it was legal.

Фото профиля J A Stevens
J A Stevens9 часов назад

That guy is something, second time I've seen him harass you guys.

Фото профиля Juan
Juan9 часов назад

What a fruitcake, guy has zero testosterone.

Фото профиля Josh Lumley
Josh Lumley9 часов назад

The amount of estrogen this dude is giving off is off the charts.

Фото профиля ن Kristian Pearson ن
ن Kristian Pearson ن10 часов назад

Definitely Sweet Hot. Lol. I'm using that on my wife later!

Фото профиля 0xB01DFACE
0xB01DFACE8 часов назад

Been watching more and more abolitionist videos. I'll always love Russell and his way of handling people - but I'm seeing more from his friends/colleagues. I don't know if I'm just stumbling on it or they're posting more... But she's another great one.

Фото профиля Pattie 🇺🇸
Pattie 🇺🇸10 часов назад

That has to be a female

Фото профиля Mike Hunt 2
Mike Hunt 28 часов назад

How many times did this same guy do this exact same scenario??

Фото профиля James Kim
James Kim8 часов назад

So he agreed with Jim Crow laws because they were laws.

Фото профиля BBQ Beer Freedom
BBQ Beer Freedom9 часов назад

don't these people realize that slavery was legal?

Фото профиля Jordan2_o
Jordan2_o6 часов назад

I love her 💪

Похожие видео