Loading video...
Video Failed to Load
That's the same question I've often asked the gun-grabbers, you protect banks, airports, and courts but not our schools! Why?
123,827 views • 1 year ago •via X (Twitter)
10 Comments

I'd rather have it and not need it, than need it and not have it. I was able to stop an armed robbery because I was armed and was able to approach while keeping him unaware I was there while giving signals to the casher to get out of his gun's bullet path. No shots fired but he went to jail that day.

Our schools in FL are like fortresses now. It shouldn't have to be this way, but it is necessary.

One of the best 2A points made in a long time

100% spot on

@katee_K1 Don’t forget politicians!

Way too much common sense

@TonemanLives Imagine what the invaders could do if the citizens were not allowed to be armed. Imagine what our own government would do if we were unarmed.

Great point! @JakeWilsonUSA had some solid insights on this recently—his take on risk and priorities really makes you think. Why aren’t schools a bigger focus?

She would smash

Wow. What a great point made by Charlie Kirk. We do have armed guards at banks and airports and some shops and jewelers. But only certain schools have armed guards. Not all schools do. That should change. They even have security and mall cops.

