The 1 thing libertarians always cope about:

Private borders and freedom of association actually enable you in creating this so called high trust society by discriminating against anyone who disturbs the peace. Why shouldn't this be possible with libertarian ideals retard?

"A lot of Libertarians are [insert metaphysics], but it comes down to [insert epistemology], like what are your [insert ethics]." Also NAP/Libertarianism is not a moral/ethical code, it's a legal position and theory. And being atheists =/= materialism.

Lol, of course its some nationalist chud strawmanning libertarianism without actually understanding the ideology. Fyi, freedom of association and private borders allow you to exclude these people from society, allowing you to create your high trust society. Without the state.

Take a crack at studying hoppeanism. You can have both high wealth and high trust, you don't have to choose just one

You're asking a loaded question. What you should be asking is "what ensures high trust and social cohesion?"

The closest you can get to “morality” within a secular framework is utilitarianism with 0 epistemological justification. Basically just circular reasoning.

"why settle for economic growth, instead of social cohesion" why not fucking both? why not start by cutting the welfare programs these retards come into the country for in the first place? why not repeal the civil rights act so you can pressure undesirables out of your community?

All i can focus on is how he sounds like falseswipe gaming

Hoppe answers both of your questions. Justification by A.E. can be found in ch. 7 of Theory of Socialism and Capitalism. As to immigration, it’s ch. 7 of Democracy the God that Failed. You should not have to accept it. Hoppe writes about open borders is forced integration.

Why do you so heavily associate materialism with libertarianism? And do you have anything for the non materialist libertarians?

@Zuluwafen he looks mean and rapeble

Being a red-hot chill peppers fan is a bigger cope. And yet you're fine with that. Checkmate.

There was a time when I was a Libertarian. Then I realized like most things, liberals infiltrated and corrupted it to make them LIBRTALtarians. All of a sudden borders and immigration laws became a liberal mentality amongst Libertarians.

Libertarianism relies on an absurd amount of trust in the average person. Tack on the degeneracy it condones and it’s just a meme ideology.

You are both Against Interventionism and LGBT Gay Rights are White Rights

Not all Libertarians support open borders. Hoppeans especially advocate for private borders and physical removal, which essentially is just deportation

bro really trying his best to proof the low IQ of drummers

w vid

The "ought" question, followed by a random line up of strawnmans, feels like someone is watching too much of crucible on youtube...Liberty presuppose the right to defend your borders, PNA works as reciprocity measure.If you deliberate rules on force, force can be used against you

At most, this only really refutes lolberts who are active in the Libertarian Party. They don’t really apply to paleolibertarians or especially Hoppeans, who have argued for closed borders, social conservatism, and high-trust societies based on freedom of association.

Libertarianism only talks about law, not ethics as a whole

Shut the fuck up faggot

Fuck. I did not mean to repost this I was just pressing buttons I never pressed before

The reason why they nap or kantianism for people as Robert nozick would describe. It is important is because Liberty as a value is Paramount to other values. You can't not value Liberty. In order to say you don't value Liberty, you must use your Liberty to say you don't value it

You're assuming that a libertarian society in which everyone would most likely be armed would somehow be a low trust society.

Strawman after strawman

This is what happens when someone thinks they are smarter than they are. It’s not that complex. Leave people alone. Don’t need an essay to explain it. Fatal flaw of nationalism is that they believe in a power structure that inevitably, without exception, gets turned against you

You call that a high-trust, high-cohesion society?