正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

“The ability to block, embargo, restrict license, or impose any other condition on a foreign country's ability to conduct trade with the United States under a EPA has been fully confirmed by this decision. So now there's no doubt, because there were a lot of questions about tariffs because... no president was smart enough to use them to protect our country from those countries and businesses that were ripping us off. You took a look at the deficits that we had with some of these countries. It was disgraceful what they got away with for many, many decades. But now we know because this decision affirms all those things that some people weren't sure about in order to protect.” -President Donald J. Trumpshow more

ThePersistence

2,461,942 subscribers

91,898 次观看 • 6 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

新闻政治财经

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

BREAKING: Trump announces that the Supreme Court's decision on tariffs has actually made the President's ability to impose tariffs "MORE POWERFUL" rather than less. "I don't think the court meant that... The ability to block, embargo, restrict, license, or impose any other condition on a foreign country's ability to conduct trade with the United States under IEEPA has been fully confirmed by this decision."

BREAKING: Trump announces that the Supreme Court's decision on tariffs has actually made the President's ability to impose tariffs "MORE POWERFUL" rather than less. "I don't think the court meant that... The ability to block, embargo, restrict, license, or impose any other condition on a foreign country's ability to conduct trade with the United States under IEEPA has been fully confirmed by this decision."

Libs of TikTok

241,711 次观看 • 6 个月前

Trump announced that the Supreme Court’s decision on tariffs has actually made the President’s authority to impose them more powerful, not weaker. “I don’t think the court meant that… The ability to block, embargo, restrict, license, or impose any other condition on a foreign country’s ability to conduct trade with the United States under IEEPA has been fully confirmed by this decision.”

Trump announced that the Supreme Court’s decision on tariffs has actually made the President’s authority to impose them more powerful, not weaker. “I don’t think the court meant that… The ability to block, embargo, restrict, license, or impose any other condition on a foreign country’s ability to conduct trade with the United States under IEEPA has been fully confirmed by this decision.”

Jammles

59,520 次观看 • 6 个月前

🚨 HOLY SMOKES. President Trump announces the Supreme Court has actually STRENGTHENED the president's ability to enact tariffs, HUGE BACKFIRE "SCOTUS made a president's ability to regulate trade and impose tariffs MORE POWERFUL and MORE CRYSTAL CLEAR, rather than less." "There's no longer ANY DOUBT, the income coming in and protection will ACTUALLY INCREASE because of the decision. I don't think SCOTUS meant that!" "Based on longstanding law and victories...the Supreme Court did NOT overrule tariffs. They merely overruled one use of IEEPA tariffs." "The ability to block, embargo, restrict, license or impose any other condition on a foreign country's ability to conduct trade with the US under IEEPA has been FULLY CONFIRMED by this decision." "Now, there's no doubt."

🚨 HOLY SMOKES. President Trump announces the Supreme Court has actually STRENGTHENED the president's ability to enact tariffs, HUGE BACKFIRE "SCOTUS made a president's ability to regulate trade and impose tariffs MORE POWERFUL and MORE CRYSTAL CLEAR, rather than less." "There's no longer ANY DOUBT, the income coming in and protection will ACTUALLY INCREASE because of the decision. I don't think SCOTUS meant that!" "Based on longstanding law and victories...the Supreme Court did NOT overrule tariffs. They merely overruled one use of IEEPA tariffs." "The ability to block, embargo, restrict, license or impose any other condition on a foreign country's ability to conduct trade with the US under IEEPA has been FULLY CONFIRMED by this decision." "Now, there's no doubt."

Eric Daugherty

923,839 次观看 • 6 个月前

.President Donald J. Trump: "You have other countries that are only there because of us... they have massive purchases from us, and we have deficits with them. And the tariffs have brought that back a long way. Our trade deficit is down 68% in one year. Think of that!"

.President Donald J. Trump: "You have other countries that are only there because of us... they have massive purchases from us, and we have deficits with them. And the tariffs have brought that back a long way. Our trade deficit is down 68% in one year. Think of that!"

Rapid Response 47

92,334 次观看 • 1 个月前

If president Trump or the US are speaking about giving Ukraine a bill for what was provided during last 2 or 3 years is just not fair, because it was a decision of the United States to provide us with security support. We were not choosing what to take. It was a decision of the United States of America, what to give us. And we are very grateful. But if now somebody will give us a bill. Sorry. It's unfair. CNN

If president Trump or the US are speaking about giving Ukraine a bill for what was provided during last 2 or 3 years is just not fair, because it was a decision of the United States to provide us with security support. We were not choosing what to take. It was a decision of the United States of America, what to give us. And we are very grateful. But if now somebody will give us a bill. Sorry. It's unfair. CNN

Oleksiy Goncharenko

16,154 次观看 • 1 年前

#WATCH | On Iran, US President Donald J Trump says, "We were having negotiations with these lunatics, and it was my opinion that they were going to attack first...If we didn't do it, they were going to attack first. I felt strongly about that...We've had a very powerful impact because virtually everything they have has been knocked out now. Their missile count is going way down. Amazingly, they're hitting countries that were neutral. They lived together for a long time...Those countries are all fighting against them...They no longer have air protection. They no longer have any detection facilities at all. They're gonna be in for a lot of hurt. These are bad people..." (Source: The White House)

#WATCH | On Iran, US President Donald J Trump says, "We were having negotiations with these lunatics, and it was my opinion that they were going to attack first...If we didn't do it, they were going to attack first. I felt strongly about that...We've had a very powerful impact because virtually everything they have has been knocked out now. Their missile count is going way down. Amazingly, they're hitting countries that were neutral. They lived together for a long time...Those countries are all fighting against them...They no longer have air protection. They no longer have any detection facilities at all. They're gonna be in for a lot of hurt. These are bad people..." (Source: The White House)

ANI

104,786 次观看 • 5 个月前

"When we were living as refugees, we went to many places telling the international community that Rwanda was our home and that we wanted to return. Some people would come and raise the matter with the government that was in power here. The response they received was that Rwanda was too small and that there was no place for us to go. Imagine being told there is no place for you in the very country you came from. You cannot tell someone to remain where they are, to spend their entire life as a refugee, and for their children to grow up as refugees as well. I used to tell people, even at the beginning of our liberation struggle, that whatever treatment we received in the countries where we lived, they were not the people I had a grievance against. After all, it was my own country that had denied me the right to return because it claimed there was no room for me. The people I had a grievance against were those who had the responsibility to guarantee my rights in my own country, but instead denied them. Those were the people we had to confront. And that is exactly what happened." President Kagame | Indangamirwa 16th Cohort #MeetThePresident

"When we were living as refugees, we went to many places telling the international community that Rwanda was our home and that we wanted to return. Some people would come and raise the matter with the government that was in power here. The response they received was that Rwanda was too small and that there was no place for us to go. Imagine being told there is no place for you in the very country you came from. You cannot tell someone to remain where they are, to spend their entire life as a refugee, and for their children to grow up as refugees as well. I used to tell people, even at the beginning of our liberation struggle, that whatever treatment we received in the countries where we lived, they were not the people I had a grievance against. After all, it was my own country that had denied me the right to return because it claimed there was no room for me. The people I had a grievance against were those who had the responsibility to guarantee my rights in my own country, but instead denied them. Those were the people we had to confront. And that is exactly what happened." President Kagame | Indangamirwa 16th Cohort #MeetThePresident

Presidency | Rwanda

214,587 次观看 • 22 天前

WATCH: Secretary of State Rubio smacks down reporter for LYING about his statements from yesterday, falsely claiming he said Israel dragged the U.S. into war with Iran.... Reporter: “Yesterday, you told us that Israel was going to strike Iran and that that's why we needed to get involved. Today, the President said that —” Rubio: “No.” Reporter: “— Iran was going to get strike [sic].” Rubio: “Yeah, your statement is false. So, that's not what — I was asked very specifically. Were you there yesterday?” Reporter: “Yes, I asked a question.” Rubio: “Okay. No. Were you the one that — because somebody asked me a question yesterday, did we go in because of Israel? And I said..., no, I told you this had to happen. Anyway, the President made a decision, and the decision he made was that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide behind its ballistic missile program, that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide behind its ability to conduct these attacks. That decision had been made. The President systematically made a decision to systematically destroy this terrorist capability that they had, and we carried that out. I was very clear on that answer. This was a question of timing, of why this had to happen as a joint operation, not the question of the intent. Once the President made a decision that negotiations were not going to work, that they were playing us on the negotiations, and that this was a threat that was untenable, the decision was made to strike them. That's what I said yesterday. And you guys need to play it. If you're going to play these statements, you need to play the whole statement, not clip it to reach a narrative that you want to do, all right?”

WATCH: Secretary of State Rubio smacks down reporter for LYING about his statements from yesterday, falsely claiming he said Israel dragged the U.S. into war with Iran.... Reporter: “Yesterday, you told us that Israel was going to strike Iran and that that's why we needed to get involved. Today, the President said that —” Rubio: “No.” Reporter: “— Iran was going to get strike [sic].” Rubio: “Yeah, your statement is false. So, that's not what — I was asked very specifically. Were you there yesterday?” Reporter: “Yes, I asked a question.” Rubio: “Okay. No. Were you the one that — because somebody asked me a question yesterday, did we go in because of Israel? And I said..., no, I told you this had to happen. Anyway, the President made a decision, and the decision he made was that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide behind its ballistic missile program, that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide behind its ability to conduct these attacks. That decision had been made. The President systematically made a decision to systematically destroy this terrorist capability that they had, and we carried that out. I was very clear on that answer. This was a question of timing, of why this had to happen as a joint operation, not the question of the intent. Once the President made a decision that negotiations were not going to work, that they were playing us on the negotiations, and that this was a threat that was untenable, the decision was made to strike them. That's what I said yesterday. And you guys need to play it. If you're going to play these statements, you need to play the whole statement, not clip it to reach a narrative that you want to do, all right?”

Curtis Houck

15,505 次观看 • 5 个月前

.United States Trade Representative Ambassador Greer: "We can conduct these investigations under Section 301 on a country by country basis, figure out what they've been doing that's been so problematic, and negotiate with those countries, but also impose a tariff as enforcement to make sure that they eliminate those practices."

.United States Trade Representative Ambassador Greer: "We can conduct these investigations under Section 301 on a country by country basis, figure out what they've been doing that's been so problematic, and negotiate with those countries, but also impose a tariff as enforcement to make sure that they eliminate those practices."

Rapid Response 47

22,973 次观看 • 5 个月前

"Was the US forced to strike because of an impending Israeli action?" Secretary Marco Rubio: "No... No matter what, ultimately, this operation needed to happen — that's the question of 'why now?' But this operation needed to happen because Iran, in about a year or a year and a half, would cross the line of immunity, meaning they would have so many short-range missiles, so many drones, that no one could do anything about it because they could hold the whole world hostage. Look at the damage they're doing now — and this is a weakened Iran. Imagine a year from now. So, that had to happen. Obviously, we were aware of Israeli intentions and understood what that would mean for us, and we had to be prepared to act as a result of it — but this had to happen no matter what."

"Was the US forced to strike because of an impending Israeli action?" Secretary Marco Rubio: "No... No matter what, ultimately, this operation needed to happen — that's the question of 'why now?' But this operation needed to happen because Iran, in about a year or a year and a half, would cross the line of immunity, meaning they would have so many short-range missiles, so many drones, that no one could do anything about it because they could hold the whole world hostage. Look at the damage they're doing now — and this is a weakened Iran. Imagine a year from now. So, that had to happen. Obviously, we were aware of Israeli intentions and understood what that would mean for us, and we had to be prepared to act as a result of it — but this had to happen no matter what."

Rapid Response 47

979,669 次观看 • 5 个月前

PRESIDENT TRUMP: In the history of our world, there’s never been a country that has so much money being invested in it as us. The auto plants are all coming to the U.S. because of my smart tariff policy. We were ripped off by other countries for years. Those days are over. 🇺🇸

PRESIDENT TRUMP: In the history of our world, there’s never been a country that has so much money being invested in it as us. The auto plants are all coming to the U.S. because of my smart tariff policy. We were ripped off by other countries for years. Those days are over. 🇺🇸

Department of State

97,202 次观看 • 3 个月前

.Karoline Leavitt: "I think President Donald J. Trump knows the country is smart enough to read past many of the Fake News headlines produced by people in this room that this action was unjustifiable. This is a rogue terrorist regime that has been threatening the United States, our allies, and our people for 47 years— and the American people are smart enough to know that."

.Karoline Leavitt: "I think President Donald J. Trump knows the country is smart enough to read past many of the Fake News headlines produced by people in this room that this action was unjustifiable. This is a rogue terrorist regime that has been threatening the United States, our allies, and our people for 47 years— and the American people are smart enough to know that."

Rapid Response 47

142,556 次观看 • 5 个月前

This is EXACTLY why we need to get rid of foreign judges and keep fighting for the SAVE America Act. SEN. TOMMY TUBERVILLE: "It shows you how turned around we are; the President of the United States has to be a natural born citizen in this country, but they have to take orders from these people from third-world countries that are coming in and being elected to the judiciary — it makes NO SENSE whatsoever. We've got so many people now in this country that aren't Americans that you have to make those decisions, unfortunately, because these people are voting in our elections and it's putting us in harm's way." "The SAVE America Act is one of the most important pieces of legislation since I've been here for 6 years. And this is only because we've had communist socialist Presidents like Biden and Obama allow people to come here and vote, and there have to be some rules about that." Protect our elections. Stop the nonsense. Pass the SAVE America Act.

This is EXACTLY why we need to get rid of foreign judges and keep fighting for the SAVE America Act. SEN. TOMMY TUBERVILLE: "It shows you how turned around we are; the President of the United States has to be a natural born citizen in this country, but they have to take orders from these people from third-world countries that are coming in and being elected to the judiciary — it makes NO SENSE whatsoever. We've got so many people now in this country that aren't Americans that you have to make those decisions, unfortunately, because these people are voting in our elections and it's putting us in harm's way." "The SAVE America Act is one of the most important pieces of legislation since I've been here for 6 years. And this is only because we've had communist socialist Presidents like Biden and Obama allow people to come here and vote, and there have to be some rules about that." Protect our elections. Stop the nonsense. Pass the SAVE America Act.

Benny Johnson

106,001 次观看 • 1 个月前

🚨DeSantis BLASTS Florida House Republicans for trying to strip him of his ability to implement Alligator Alcatraz and protect us from illegals coming ashore! “If it wasn't for what we did, you would have seen half of Haiti end up coming on our shores! Just our state vessels interdicted almost 20,000 illegal aliens who were then repatriated to their home countries, Bahamas, Haiti, Cuba, wherever they're coming from. And we were able to just imagine, had we not done that, to have flooding people just showing up. And the thing is, some of the people that did get through contraband in the boats, drugs in the boats, all this stuff, that's not what you want. We were able to do that, you know, through our ability to use Division of Emergency Management. You know, all that instability in Haiti a year or two ago, remember people were saying there was going to be a flood. New York Times, ‘Florida's going to be overwhelmed’, all these stuff. And it didn't happen. Was that luck? No, it was not luck. It was because they knew if they got in those boats and came to our way, they'd be stopped. Period, end of story. And we were able to do that. So, we've got to keep doing all those things.”

🚨DeSantis BLASTS Florida House Republicans for trying to strip him of his ability to implement Alligator Alcatraz and protect us from illegals coming ashore! “If it wasn't for what we did, you would have seen half of Haiti end up coming on our shores! Just our state vessels interdicted almost 20,000 illegal aliens who were then repatriated to their home countries, Bahamas, Haiti, Cuba, wherever they're coming from. And we were able to just imagine, had we not done that, to have flooding people just showing up. And the thing is, some of the people that did get through contraband in the boats, drugs in the boats, all this stuff, that's not what you want. We were able to do that, you know, through our ability to use Division of Emergency Management. You know, all that instability in Haiti a year or two ago, remember people were saying there was going to be a flood. New York Times, ‘Florida's going to be overwhelmed’, all these stuff. And it didn't happen. Was that luck? No, it was not luck. It was because they knew if they got in those boats and came to our way, they'd be stopped. Period, end of story. And we were able to do that. So, we've got to keep doing all those things.”

Chris Nelson 🏝️🇺🇸

35,671 次观看 • 6 个月前

#WATCH | Washington DC | US President Donald Trump says, "... Of the 7 wars I stopped, 4 were because I had tariffs and trade and I was able to say, 'If you go fight and want to kill everybody, that is okay, but I am going to charge you each 100% tariff when you trade with us'. They all gave up... we are taking trillions of dollars in tariffs and stopping wars due to tariffs... Other countries did it to us and now we are doing it to other countries." (Source: Unrestricted Pool Via Reuters)

#WATCH | Washington DC | US President Donald Trump says, "... Of the 7 wars I stopped, 4 were because I had tariffs and trade and I was able to say, 'If you go fight and want to kill everybody, that is okay, but I am going to charge you each 100% tariff when you trade with us'. They all gave up... we are taking trillions of dollars in tariffs and stopping wars due to tariffs... Other countries did it to us and now we are doing it to other countries." (Source: Unrestricted Pool Via Reuters)

ANI

78,099 次观看 • 11 个月前

Collins: Some people may say, well, why are we at war with them now if it was obliterated, then? Scott: Well, because they're rebuilding their program because they said they had they they had enriched uranium and because they were building ballistic missile weapons, the missiles and the ability to carry those to the United States.

Collins: Some people may say, well, why are we at war with them now if it was obliterated, then? Scott: Well, because they're rebuilding their program because they said they had they they had enriched uranium and because they were building ballistic missile weapons, the missiles and the ability to carry those to the United States.

Acyn

35,915 次观看 • 5 个月前

Trump: Our country was the strongest, believe it or not, from 1870 to 1913. You know why? It was all tariff based we had no income tax. Then in 1913, some genius came up with the idea of let's charge the people of our country, not foreign countries that are ripping off our country.

Trump: Our country was the strongest, believe it or not, from 1870 to 1913. You know why? It was all tariff based we had no income tax. Then in 1913, some genius came up with the idea of let's charge the people of our country, not foreign countries that are ripping off our country.

Acyn

3,855,492 次观看 • 1 年前