Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
The ability to heal is proof Life is Intelligently designed. Think about this. Without the ability to heal, the smallest injury would be devastating, even for the simplest single celled organism. A single cell that could not heal itself would not live long enough to evolve anything. Healing is... show more
20,306 Aufrufe • vor 3 Tagen •via X (Twitter)
46 Kommentare
The ability to heal is proof evolution is self-corrective.
The ability to heal couldn't have evolved. That's the point.
Evolution is a retrieval cycle, that's why it is possible to heal itself from memorized reflections.
Memorized reflections? Im not going to google and assume youre making up nonsense words to sound smart. A shit ton.. thats how... a shit ton die and one survives and replicates, and of those, only one might survive and replicate, but in those two steps alone its become 2 degrees of separation from what it started as.
@DivinelyDesined Evolution is a copying process in the reflection of time that stores in memory from which it develops. Evolution goes wrong until it gets right so a lot dies, it is still going on; dead cells are removed from the body when someone takes a shit.
@DivinelyDesined I hate when personification of things or processes misrepresent intelligence... evolution doesnt 'remember' and gorillas dont 'know' that theyre supposed to spread a specific plant on their cuts (they feel it)
@DivinelyDesined That's right, we feel everything. What we feel naturally is learned long ago which is stored in DNA, that is why a gorilla feels that. How do you remember things in what you learn, how does it get stored?
You can repeating this, but it does not become true just because you do
Skin repairing itself = talking snakes. Makes perfect sense to me
What is the difference between healing and growing?
Healing requires a separate distinct set of specialized molecules and genetic information.
Healing shares core cell proliferation and growth factor pathways with normal tissue development. It is based on the same functions and factors. Giving them different labels and naming the stage of the process doesn't make it something new or a different process.
After the healing process has already been triggered, the development of the damaged tissues uses the same information as growth. But before that happens, there is a separate and distinct process of sensing, identifying, tagging, and coordinating a number of various molecules to regulate that new growth correctly in the damaged area. That process requires a whole set of molecules and information completely separate from growth.
Activation of those processes are a part of the growth process. They are grown to function.
No. The healing process uses a distinct set of molecules and genetic information that is completely separate from standard growth and development. The healing process is not activated whatsoever during normal development. These are entirely separate processes that require separate systems. First damage is detected, healing system is triggered, then growth cycle is triggered. They're not the same thing.
For it to be triggered ... it must already exist.
That overstates the separation. Many of the same pathways (growth factors, Wnt, TGF-β, stem-cell activation) run in both development and repair. The injury-specific part is mainly the trigger layer ... DAMPs, inflammation, clotting ... that tells the existing construction machinery where and when to restart. Those trigger components themselves had to be built during development,
Whenever we show creationists the evolution of X (or just modern creatures with a range of X, making due with 'half an X'), they say 'that's not real X'. Today's it's 'healing'. This is called tyranny of the discontinuous mind: drawing & moving lines to deny all gradual change.
Also the ability to grow, written in every living thing's DNA. Intelligent design 👌
All your evidence always have the same flow Here is x, I reject scientific consensus of why x is there, so x is now unexplainable and so conveniently an intelligent creator made x possible, classic Teological bias. Anyways go research on overlapping redundancy it debunks you
“I don’t understand, so a god must have done it.” Read a book about evolution (eg Dawkins). Learn how the process works, and how ever-increasing improvements become almost inevitable once started. Understand the almost unimaginably vast period of time in which this has occurred.
the fallacy of argument from incredulity only exhibits from the uneducated
Your post has three separate flaws, and each one is enough to sink it. Why do you always come up with such RUBBISH? 1. The simplest "healing" requires no machinery at all. A lipid bilayer reseals small breaches spontaneously, because an exposed hydrophobic edge is 1/x
Soooo... then why did your God design Axolotls to regrow complete limbs and organs, where he decided in all his wisdom that, even with it being possible for other animals, it shouldn't occur in humans?
"A single cell that could not heal itself would not live long enough to evolve anything." Yes, the only ones that survived were the ones that could heal themselves. This is exactly how evolution works.
Think about this, your god gave the ability to grow limbs back, to fucking salamanders
Don't you think that self healing is more evidence that evolution works as those without that would die younger and have less descendants?
Your brain is the byproduct of years of unconscious adaptations that took a billion years to get to this point. Don't disrespect the power of time.
The ability to heal is an illustration of the astounding complexity of Life, not that it was intelligently designed.
@grok what do you think? Is the human body’s ability to heal itself proof of intelligent design?
In near reverence atheist @EthicalSkeptic article concludes the same When life "arrived" it was fully formed for growth Survival Adaptability Immutability Replication And as you note Self Healing The Peculiar Schema of DNA Codon's Second Letter
The idea that this evolved by a step-by-step process is irrational.
What about people who can't heal? Where's the intelligent design for them?
The organisms whose damaged cells began to heal didn’t die off so fast. Biochemical healing processes became all the rage and got better and better ( evolved ) over time. Can any of you fuckers comprehend just how long 4.5 Billion years is ?
We have reach a point where even if God would come down here, introduce himself, tell people He is God and and create in front of them, they would find a way to deny it. It is not a lack of faith. Its straight up denial. There is nothing you can say to these ppls.
If the ability to heal proves intelligent design, then why do some reptiles regenerate parts of their bodies and humans don't???
No. This is proof that cells unable to heal (as you say) would die out. That's survival of the fittest, or evolution. Thanks for proving the point. Also, cells that never die mean they cannot adapt to changing environments.
And how does that prove a god?
The ability for retards like you to make posts like this is proof that unintelligent life exists
If the design is so intelligent, why are there so many flaws?
Complete nonsense as usual. You're pathetic. lol
Why do you keep posting the same nonsense? We already know you are a fucking moron, you don't have to keep convincing us.
CELLS FOR THE CELL GOD! BRAINS FOR THE BRAIN THRONE!
Single cells don't heal themselves. They're shut down and moved out. Learn some remedial science, ya dumb fuck.
The cells are living and heal themselves because life is precious to them also … without that possibility nothing would exist
Idos domi! The Elantrians know all too well...
