正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

The ActBlue House Hearing today proved this true: ActBlue is how Democrats launder large foreign money disguised as small individual donors ‌ Kamala Harris Campaign “Swiss billionaire, lives in Wyoming made $20 million donation broken down into 1.6 million individual donations across 400,000 donors. The scale of fraud that...

113,416 次观看 • 2 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

ACTBLUE MUST FACE CONGRESS AFTER MASSIVE FRAUD & FOREIGN ELECTION FUNDING DOJ PROBE. ActBlue officials have been subpoenaed and are now legally obligated to testify before Congress over years of enormous fraud regarding their fundraising platform directly connected to the Democratic Party. They are alleged to have been laundering money through ActBlue for years using unaware American citizens' personal information in an attempt to cover up the illegal donations, especially coming from foreign nations. Biden’s Treasury Secretary stonewalled Congress refusing to release ActBlue information, the top seven executives at ActBlue resigned as billions of taxpayer dollars in small dollar donations to ActBlue coming from USAID to Democrat-aligned NGOs began to disappear. Pam Bondi has also been ordered by President Trump to investigate ActBlue. One person summoned is a current senior workflow specialist, and the other is the former VP of customer service, Alyssa Twomey, per NYP. Are you starting to understand how these illegal operations steal and launders your taxpayer dollars and hides foreign money and why USAID and all these front companies and NGOs were so important? And it's all being used to undermine the American citizens, their interests, and the United States in general all while using your own taxpayer dollars and information to cover it all up, steal elections, destroy the country, and enrich themselves. This isn't politics. This is a literal criminal enterprise disguised as a government organization.

The SCIF

91,664 次观看 • 1 年前

Jocelyn Benson’s Grassroots Fundraising Is a Smurf-Ridden Lie A little old lady in Lansing apparently has sent more than $82,000 to Democrats, but says “I don’t think that was me” By Charlie LeDuff Charlie LeDuff Lansing — Linda D. Appling, a 77-year-old retiree, resides in a humble house with a sign in the front door that instructs visitors to try the side door. The side entrance is missing a storm door and the steps are in need of a shoveling. Ms. Appling lives with a young man who can’t manage to get his car started this cold morning because the battery is old and a new battery is beyond his means. Despite these lean circumstances, Ms. Appling is something of a Democratic super donor. According to state and federal campaign filings, Ms. Appling has made 8,738 contributions totaling more than $82,000, a fact that she seems wholly unaware of. “I don’t think that was me to be truthful about it,” said Ms. Appling as she struggled with the ice in her ill-fitting boots and aluminum cane. “I acknowledge that I’ve given some people about $2.50.” According to those filings, she has also contributed to the gubernatorial campaign of Jocelyn Benson, the current Michigan secretary of state, even though she hasn’t made up her mind about governor. “Who do you like for governor?” I asked. “Well now, I have no idea,” she said. “No idea just yet?” “I don’t.” Nevertheless, I showed Ms. Appling a spreadsheet which noted that she has contributed nine months in a row to Benson. The January pledge was $7 and the subsequent eight donations of $2.50 were all paid on the last day of the month. Benson crows about her 32,000 small donors, people like Ms. Appling, who have contributed less than $100, allowing her to raise nearly $5 million in her bid for governor. Benson calls it a grassroots swell. But it appears to be something more nefarious. A random sample of these so-called “small donors” who have contributed to Benson’s campaigns were examined by Bob Cushman, a retired pilot and current citizen journalist. Since November 2022, Benson has raised $5.5 million, with nearly half of that money coming from out-of-state donors, according to Cushman’s research. Nearly all of those contributions were $10 or less. There’s 85-year-old Frank from Maryland who kicked in a total of $100 at six bucks a pop. There’s 84-year-old Fred from Upstate New York who anted up with six contributions of $6. How about 82-year-old Marcella of Surprise, Arizona? It’s no surprise Marcella is all in for Jocelyn with 20 donations of $1 a piece. How is this possible? ActBlue is an online fundraising site designed specifically to raise money for Democrats. People can contribute to candidates through ActBlue or may contribute directly to ActBlue, which in turn donates to Democratic candidates and causes. It has raised $16 billion since its founding in 2004. But ActBlue is ensnared in multiple federal investigations alleging that it has stolen the identities of small donors—usually senior citizens like Ms. Appling—and is using their names to launder larger donations that exceed legal limits. By breaking the large donations into multiple smaller contributions, the amount and the origin of the money is hidden. Several senior staff members from ActBlue abruptly resigned earlier this year following the fraud allegations. Little people like Ms. Appling are called straw donors or smurfs. And Benson—in her capacity as secretary of state—is supposed to protect them. Not use them. “I’ve donated some money for sure,” said Ms. Appling, the Grandma Smurf of south Lansing, “but not this amount.”

Michigan Enjoyer

58,165 次观看 • 8 个月前

Official ActBlue training documents show ActBlue was training their employees to ignore fraud They even trained their employees to let donations come in with fake names and not flag suspicious fraudulent donations from campaigns Democrats actually setup their donation systems to intentionally allow fraud to happen We need prison sentences for prominent Democrats and their donors The next 4 items that I'm about to show you all come from ActBlue's internal policy and training materials, written by ActBlue's own management for ActBlue's own fraud review staff to guide how the company must handle suspicious donations day to day: “First, we've got a security briefing sent to ActBlue staff explaining why certain red flags were not a priority. And I quote, "We are not the primary target of people looking to commit merchant fraud. People who steal credit card information don't try to give that money away." Second, from the onboarding guide given to every new hire on the fraud prevention team, "We want to give our donors the benefit of the doubt and think about the reasons why a contribution is legitimate." trainees were never told to reject a donation over a single suspicious characteristic. One red flag just isn't enough. Give it the benefit of the doubt” Here’s where it gets really criminal “Third, from that same training material, and this one is honestly almost too gross to believe, I quote, "If an otherwise legitimate donor uses a fake name, we would want to accept their donations." Fourth, also from that training material, staff were instructed that when a campaign itself enters a large suspicious donation directly, they should look past it because flagging it might put the campaign in, quote, "an awkward position of having to call their own donor and ask what's going on’” People need to go to prison

Wall Street Apes

49,989 次观看 • 2 个月前

Is El-Sayed's Campaign Funded by Elderly Fake Donors? ActBlue says an 88-year-old widow has given over $150k to Dems over the past five years, but she says that's not possible By Charlie LeDuff Charlie LeDuff Milan — Out in the country on a rutted dirt road lined with corn lives an old woman and her dog. Elizabeth Waffle, 88, was forced to move into a shabby trailer two years ago after her house burned down. She owns an old pickup truck but no computer. Nevertheless, Waffle, who lives on a modest pension, is a true believer in liberal causes and continues to make small political donations by way of ActBlue—the Democrat online fundraising platform. But somehow, those few dozen small donations she has made over the past five years have transmogrified into 14,696 donations totaling more than $150,000—the equivalent of eight donations a day, every day for the past five years, averaging $9.18. “One hundred and fifty thousand?” Waffle said with real surprise. “Hell no. I don’t have that kind of money.” She says she has contributed to Abdul El-Sayed, the Democratic Socialist running for Michigan’s U.S. Senate seat, but not 47 times spanning the last two years, as federal filings show. El-Sayed promises to get money out of politics. He makes a great show of refusing corporate PAC money. But that’s just wordplay. El-Sayed does take special interest money. He takes money from his father-in-law. Most concerning, he takes money from ActBlue. The subject of multiple investigations, the fundraising platform is accused of “rinsing” foreign money and massive private donations by using the stolen names and addresses of real, often elderly Americans to fabricate hundreds of small-dollar donations. Names like Elizabeth Waffle. ActBlue CEO Regina Wallace-Jones recently invoked her Fifth Amendment rights 22 times during a congressional hearing regarding foreign contributions. According to FEC campaign contributions compiled by Bob Cushman, ActBlue shows Waffle donating from her trailer, even though she has no computer and spotty internet access. It also shows her donating from an apartment she rented in town two years ago after her house burned down. Sometimes it shows Waffle donating from both the trailer and the apartment on the same day. It shows her donating to out-of-state candidates she’s never heard of. “This is very abnormal,” said Waffle, who sat in the trailer threshold looking over the paperwork I had brought. “I think it’s wrong, and I think there’s something in there that’s off.” El-Sayed’s campaign brags that he’s the top Michigan fundraiser off the ActBlue platform, having raised 10 times the money from small-dollar donors than his primary opponent, Haley Stevens. Stevens has also taken ActBlue money. As has Slotkin, Whitmer, Nessel, Benson, Gilchrist, and the entire Democrat gang. But it is Abdul who plays the sanctimony card. If he is really serious about getting corrupt money out of politics, then he ought to get off ActBlue and return the money. Anything else is elder abuse.

Michigan Enjoyer

1,821,572 次观看 • 29 天前

WOAH 🚨 MASSIVE Democrats ActBlue money laundering scam uncovered Democrats are pretending to buy $200,000 houses and CREATING $200 MILLION DOLLAR MORTGAGES and then laundering the money through wire transfers This isn’t uncommon, THEY’RE FOUND ALL OVER THE NATION RAN THROUGH ACTBLUE “Magic mortgages — Let's imagine you buy a house — for $200,000 and it's funded by one of the North American banks. We'll just say Wells Fargo, please don't sue me. All the records, including the mortgage, the deed of trust, the Alta insurance policy, all of those records are recorded in the county record. Then just a few minutes later, your $200,000 house suddenly has a $200 million magic mortgage that comes through. It's nothing but a wire that goes through the title company. There's no lender involved because it's a hard money loan, what they call a cash hard money loan. But because it goes through a title company, there's no notation of who the lender is and it goes on through the system. Now what's interesting is, and this is what caught our attention, these are ActBlue officers, corporate officers. Once we found one, it led to another and, and another, and another and another. So we have them all over the nation. And this is just one small fragment of the human map. You leave this digital dust, if you will. This is one small fragment.“ This is one of the many ways Democrats launder Dark Money And to explain this in ver simple terms that makes this easy to understand, - Democrats have homes that aren’t very expensive - They take out massive loans against these homes, this happens around election cycles - Now they have tons of money for their campaigns It’s fraud

Wall Street Apes

424,383 次观看 • 2 个月前

WOAH 🚨 MASSIVE Democrats ActBlue money laundering scam uncovered Democrats are pretending to buy $200,000 houses and CREATING $200 MILLION DOLLAR MORTGAGES and then laundering the money through wire transfers This isn’t uncommon, THEY’RE FOUND ALL OVER THE NATION RAN THROUGH ACTBLUE “Magic mortgages — Let's imagine you buy a house — for $200,000 and it's funded by one of the North American banks. We'll just say Wells Fargo, please don't sue me. All the records, including the mortgage, the deed of trust, the Alta insurance policy, all of those records are recorded in the county record. Then just a few minutes later, your $200,000 house suddenly has a $200 million magic mortgage that comes through. It's nothing but a wire that goes through the title company. There's no lender involved because it's a hard money loan, what they call a cash hard money loan. But because it goes through a title company, there's no notation of who the lender is and it goes on through the system. Now what's interesting is, and this is what caught our attention, these are ActBlue officers, corporate officers. Once we found one, it led to another and, and another, and another and another. So we have them all over the nation. And this is just one small fragment of the human map. You leave this digital dust, if you will. This is one small fragment.“ Democrats ActBlue Magic Mortgage Money Laundering Scheme: This is one of the many ways Democrats launder Dark Money

Wall Street Apes

1,077,024 次观看 • 1 年前