Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

🐊The algae was never really the issue. People often say they want things fixed. Until someone fixes them. Then the argument shifts to whether they should have been touched at all. Which raises a question: Why are we sometimes more comfortable with decline than with change? 🤔 That's the... underlying fight. They drained the Reflection Pool, cleaned it, and gave it a fresh look. Now the fight isn't about the water — it's about whether it should have been touched at all. And by whom. The shade of Old Glory blue. The destained stone. The change itself. Shut out the usual partisan noise for a moment. Why are we sometimes more comfortable with visible decline than with any attempt at renewal? Is this really about preserving history... Or is it resistance to change itself? The battle lines are drawn. Pick a side and weigh in on history in the making. At what point does "protecting the past" become fear of the future?👀 Think about it. The ancient battle between: preservation and renewal. Now that I think about it, that’s much more interesting mystery than the shade of blue. 🤣🔵show more

Tosca Austen

138,905 subscribers

23,268 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Kunst Nachrichten & Politik

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Peter Doocy asks President Trump if Jill Biden should have to testify about "what she did or didn't do" to conceal Joe Biden's decline: "They have to do what's right...I think the autopen is going to become one of the great scandals of all time...I understand he signed almost everything with an autopen. It's a very dangerous thing. It really means you're not President. Whoever operated the autopen—and we think we know who that is—and it was actually more than one person. That's not what the presidency is all about."

Peter Doocy asks President Trump if Jill Biden should have to testify about "what she did or didn't do" to conceal Joe Biden's decline: "They have to do what's right...I think the autopen is going to become one of the great scandals of all time...I understand he signed almost everything with an autopen. It's a very dangerous thing. It really means you're not President. Whoever operated the autopen—and we think we know who that is—and it was actually more than one person. That's not what the presidency is all about."

Julia 🇺🇸

40,858 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Really interesting & important to hear from Pat McFadden on why education needs shaking up as AI will both “destroy and create” jobs “I think that technological change makes this more urgent than it has been in the past. In some ways, I think this is government and policy catching up with the conversation that is going on among young people themselves, because they are very alive to how technological change can influence career options. “So perhaps the assumptions about what was a safe and secure job in the past no longer apply today. “I think that gives new life to the traditional trades. It gives new life to some of the technical skills that we want to prize through the announcement that we’re making today. “And the labour market is changing. This is a general-purpose technology, it will both destroy jobs and create jobs. “And if you’re a young person starting out in life at the moment, thinking about what you’ll do in the future, I think the calculations that you make about your employment security are probably different today than they would have been 10 or 20 years ago.”

Really interesting & important to hear from Pat McFadden on why education needs shaking up as AI will both “destroy and create” jobs “I think that technological change makes this more urgent than it has been in the past. In some ways, I think this is government and policy catching up with the conversation that is going on among young people themselves, because they are very alive to how technological change can influence career options. “So perhaps the assumptions about what was a safe and secure job in the past no longer apply today. “I think that gives new life to the traditional trades. It gives new life to some of the technical skills that we want to prize through the announcement that we’re making today. “And the labour market is changing. This is a general-purpose technology, it will both destroy jobs and create jobs. “And if you’re a young person starting out in life at the moment, thinking about what you’ll do in the future, I think the calculations that you make about your employment security are probably different today than they would have been 10 or 20 years ago.”

Sophy Ridge

27,212 Aufrufe • vor 10 Tagen

THE YOUNGER GENERATION IS ANGRY. They are wondering whether anything they have been told all their lives been the truth. Was any of it true? The more they have learned about the USAID is overwhelming and they are calling it treason. What do you think? Are you angry too?

THE YOUNGER GENERATION IS ANGRY. They are wondering whether anything they have been told all their lives been the truth. Was any of it true? The more they have learned about the USAID is overwhelming and they are calling it treason. What do you think? Are you angry too?

BelannF

15,014 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

ELON: CITIZEN JOURNALISTS OFTEN KNOW MORE THAN LEGACY JOURNALISTS “I think the media is a driver of misinformation much more than the media would like to admit that they are. In a lot of cases, it is the average citizen that knows more than the journalist. Very often, when I see an article about something that I know a lot about, they get a lot wrong. It's the best interpretation of someone who doesn't really understand what's going on in the industry. If somebody is actually an expert in the field, and was actually there and then writes about their experience, I think that's going to be better than a journalist.” Source: Interview with the BBC, April 2023

ELON: CITIZEN JOURNALISTS OFTEN KNOW MORE THAN LEGACY JOURNALISTS “I think the media is a driver of misinformation much more than the media would like to admit that they are. In a lot of cases, it is the average citizen that knows more than the journalist. Very often, when I see an article about something that I know a lot about, they get a lot wrong. It's the best interpretation of someone who doesn't really understand what's going on in the industry. If somebody is actually an expert in the field, and was actually there and then writes about their experience, I think that's going to be better than a journalist.” Source: Interview with the BBC, April 2023

Mario Nawfal

2,325,781 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Chris Cuomo GOES OFF on NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani after he joked about people launching chunks of ice at NYPD officers: “You don’t joke it off. You wouldn’t be joking it off if they were throwing it at someone with a hijab. Then you would be all about it.” “Mr. Mayor, wake up brother! This isn’t about a snowball fight. This is about BACKING the people who are enforcing the law. I mean this is crazy!” “You should be all over the blue. Standing with them and saying, ‘Thank God, they are so well trained and have the character they do to be better than the sh*t standing around them in that situation.’”

Chris Cuomo GOES OFF on NYC Mayor Zohran Mamdani after he joked about people launching chunks of ice at NYPD officers: “You don’t joke it off. You wouldn’t be joking it off if they were throwing it at someone with a hijab. Then you would be all about it.” “Mr. Mayor, wake up brother! This isn’t about a snowball fight. This is about BACKING the people who are enforcing the law. I mean this is crazy!” “You should be all over the blue. Standing with them and saying, ‘Thank God, they are so well trained and have the character they do to be better than the sh*t standing around them in that situation.’”

RedWave Press

144,448 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Beto is back on the scene: "We should meet fire with fire. Why the f*** are we responding to the other side instead of taking the offense on these things? Republicans care about power more than anything else. Democrats care more about being right. And we have to change that."

Beto is back on the scene: "We should meet fire with fire. Why the f*** are we responding to the other side instead of taking the offense on these things? Republicans care about power more than anything else. Democrats care more about being right. And we have to change that."

TheBlaze

82,829 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Billy Bragg, “People believe we should salute this flag” “This is the problem about it. This is my patriotism and you have to agree with it” “There are many different times of patriotism” “Sometimes the flag is associated with the more racist violent elements. But there’s also a positive aspect of it” “Because of Reform UK, we will find out whether we are the sort of people as a nation who would attack a mosque because we’ve heard a rumour about a person of colour” “Or whether we are the people who will come out the next time and clean the mess up” “And I know whose side I’m on”

Billy Bragg, “People believe we should salute this flag” “This is the problem about it. This is my patriotism and you have to agree with it” “There are many different times of patriotism” “Sometimes the flag is associated with the more racist violent elements. But there’s also a positive aspect of it” “Because of Reform UK, we will find out whether we are the sort of people as a nation who would attack a mosque because we’ve heard a rumour about a person of colour” “Or whether we are the people who will come out the next time and clean the mess up” “And I know whose side I’m on”

Farrukh

106,080 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

I’ve made a short film. Look at the things around you: doors, bins, staircases, furniture, railings, doorhandles, windows. Do you like how they look, or not? Modern design has become boring, but it doesn’t have to be this way. The word “beautiful” is overused. We don’t need “beautiful” lamps, bus stops, and water fountains – we just need lamps, bus stops, and water fountains that are interesting, that actually mean something. Or, at the very least, not boring. Because the aesthetics of architecture and urban design aren’t just a bonus; they totally change how we think, feel, and behave. Boring environments make us more stressed and less productive; they erode our sense of community; they make us sadder, less trusting, and lonelier. A boring world is one where we spend even more time online and where our addictions are even harder to battle. The Problem There is global, widespread dissatisfaction with how the world looks. In this film, and the series it will lead to, we want to investigate that feeling and give it a voice. The point isn’t that we should return to the past or get rid of modernism. It’s about learning from the past in order to improve the present, and about giving the public what they very clearly want, which isn’t the eradication of modernism but the co-existence of modernism AND traditionalism. Just look where tourists go, where they take their photos, and that tells you everything you need to know about what most people find interesting or beautiful. And look at where people go on holiday. It’s always to cities filled with old architecture and design, with churches and mosques and palaces, with charming little alleyways and stone staircases and wrought-iron railings. Of the world’s fifty most visited buildings, only four were made in the 20th century, and they’re all museums or memorials. There’s a reason why posts about this go viral online all the time. Regardless of why the change happened, it is clearly the case that we no longer make things how we used to. People are rightly confused by the fact that old lamp posts (to take the example we focus on in the film) are usually so pretty, while modern ones are usually so boring. Some people say this is just an example of survivorship bias… and they’re mostly correct. But that’s the whole point! Saying old buildings are usually prettier than modern buildings is not to say that architecture used to be better, or that the past was better. It is simply to say that certain kinds of buildings, because they have been preserved, are good examples of what people like most. In which case... shouldn't we try to design at least some buildings in a way that we know people like? A Unifying Cause Everybody, from all sides of the political spectrum and all backgrounds, stands to benefit from a world that is designed more thoughtfully and imaginatively. The world could be such a colourful, meaningful, and thrilling place! So this isn’t about left versus right or conservatism versus progressivism; it’s about making our world a more interesting and meaningful place to live in. This should be a unifying cause, because everybody loses out when our homes and cities are badly designed. I want this film to unite people who think they’re on opposite sides, and to create a consensus that we need to change our approach to how we design our buildings and the objects – benches, bus stops, bins, lamp posts, aircon units – that fill our cities. The Importance of Details We are incredibly rich and have a sprawling choice of shows to stream, phones to buy, or shoes to wear… but everything feels more and more generic all the time. If you want to understand a society, don’t listen to what it says about itself – look at what it creates. You can learn everything about the Victorians – the good and the bad – just by looking at their lamp posts. And what do the ordinary details of the modern world say about us? That we are technologically advanced, very efficient… and care more about making money, about making things as quickly and cheaply as possible, than making our world an enjoyable place to actually live in. It’s important to learn about why and how things have changed, but that’s for another time. The first step is establishing that the public aren’t happy with modern architecture and design, and that something needs to be done. But what we need isn’t a total revival of so-called ‘traditionalism’; the truth is that traditionalism and modernism can (and should) co-exist. The trouble right now is that we only have one, and that people are tired of it. The Power of Noticing But this film (and the series it will, all being well, lead to) is about more than the specific argument it presents. Above all it’s about a way of seeing the world around us, a way of noticing and thinking. “How you do anything is how you do everything.” That is probably true, and it also applies to whole societies, not just individuals; a single doorbell implies everything else about the whole socio-economic and political system that gave rise to its creation. And, beyond being merely “useful”, the ability to notice details makes the world a richer place to live in, and life a richer thing to lead. This is what the film is about, more than anything: the power and joy of noticing. A Bigger Project This short film is just the beginning. We want to make a full series about the history of art and architecture, both for their own sake and also to see what we can learn about life in the twenty-first century and how to improve it. To keep updated you can join our email list over at our website, linked in the reply below. Final Words You can watch the film here on X, or over on YouTube, also linked in the reply below. So… this is where the dream begins, the dream of a new series and the dream of a more charming, more interesting, more meaningful modern world. Spread the word.

I’ve made a short film. Look at the things around you: doors, bins, staircases, furniture, railings, doorhandles, windows. Do you like how they look, or not? Modern design has become boring, but it doesn’t have to be this way. The word “beautiful” is overused. We don’t need “beautiful” lamps, bus stops, and water fountains – we just need lamps, bus stops, and water fountains that are interesting, that actually mean something. Or, at the very least, not boring. Because the aesthetics of architecture and urban design aren’t just a bonus; they totally change how we think, feel, and behave. Boring environments make us more stressed and less productive; they erode our sense of community; they make us sadder, less trusting, and lonelier. A boring world is one where we spend even more time online and where our addictions are even harder to battle. The Problem There is global, widespread dissatisfaction with how the world looks. In this film, and the series it will lead to, we want to investigate that feeling and give it a voice. The point isn’t that we should return to the past or get rid of modernism. It’s about learning from the past in order to improve the present, and about giving the public what they very clearly want, which isn’t the eradication of modernism but the co-existence of modernism AND traditionalism. Just look where tourists go, where they take their photos, and that tells you everything you need to know about what most people find interesting or beautiful. And look at where people go on holiday. It’s always to cities filled with old architecture and design, with churches and mosques and palaces, with charming little alleyways and stone staircases and wrought-iron railings. Of the world’s fifty most visited buildings, only four were made in the 20th century, and they’re all museums or memorials. There’s a reason why posts about this go viral online all the time. Regardless of why the change happened, it is clearly the case that we no longer make things how we used to. People are rightly confused by the fact that old lamp posts (to take the example we focus on in the film) are usually so pretty, while modern ones are usually so boring. Some people say this is just an example of survivorship bias… and they’re mostly correct. But that’s the whole point! Saying old buildings are usually prettier than modern buildings is not to say that architecture used to be better, or that the past was better. It is simply to say that certain kinds of buildings, because they have been preserved, are good examples of what people like most. In which case... shouldn't we try to design at least some buildings in a way that we know people like? A Unifying Cause Everybody, from all sides of the political spectrum and all backgrounds, stands to benefit from a world that is designed more thoughtfully and imaginatively. The world could be such a colourful, meaningful, and thrilling place! So this isn’t about left versus right or conservatism versus progressivism; it’s about making our world a more interesting and meaningful place to live in. This should be a unifying cause, because everybody loses out when our homes and cities are badly designed. I want this film to unite people who think they’re on opposite sides, and to create a consensus that we need to change our approach to how we design our buildings and the objects – benches, bus stops, bins, lamp posts, aircon units – that fill our cities. The Importance of Details We are incredibly rich and have a sprawling choice of shows to stream, phones to buy, or shoes to wear… but everything feels more and more generic all the time. If you want to understand a society, don’t listen to what it says about itself – look at what it creates. You can learn everything about the Victorians – the good and the bad – just by looking at their lamp posts. And what do the ordinary details of the modern world say about us? That we are technologically advanced, very efficient… and care more about making money, about making things as quickly and cheaply as possible, than making our world an enjoyable place to actually live in. It’s important to learn about why and how things have changed, but that’s for another time. The first step is establishing that the public aren’t happy with modern architecture and design, and that something needs to be done. But what we need isn’t a total revival of so-called ‘traditionalism’; the truth is that traditionalism and modernism can (and should) co-exist. The trouble right now is that we only have one, and that people are tired of it. The Power of Noticing But this film (and the series it will, all being well, lead to) is about more than the specific argument it presents. Above all it’s about a way of seeing the world around us, a way of noticing and thinking. “How you do anything is how you do everything.” That is probably true, and it also applies to whole societies, not just individuals; a single doorbell implies everything else about the whole socio-economic and political system that gave rise to its creation. And, beyond being merely “useful”, the ability to notice details makes the world a richer place to live in, and life a richer thing to lead. This is what the film is about, more than anything: the power and joy of noticing. A Bigger Project This short film is just the beginning. We want to make a full series about the history of art and architecture, both for their own sake and also to see what we can learn about life in the twenty-first century and how to improve it. To keep updated you can join our email list over at our website, linked in the reply below. Final Words You can watch the film here on X, or over on YouTube, also linked in the reply below. So… this is where the dream begins, the dream of a new series and the dream of a more charming, more interesting, more meaningful modern world. Spread the word.

The Cultural Tutor

2,728,358 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

#WATCH | Delhi: Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra says, "We used to say that we are world leaders. We used to say that we are peacemakers. Whether it's the war in Ukraine or the situation today, we should think about it." On the Transgender bill, she says, "I really think that it's unfortunate that they are not sending it to the standing committee. What the community feels is that this bill is going to obliterate their identity, and therefore it was very, very important that they should have been consulted and that this bill that is being brought about should have taken place or should have been passed after proper consultation. I think it's very unfair that the entire community feels like they have not been consulted, and such a big decision is being taken in their context. I wish the government had listened and put it on the standing committee."

#WATCH | Delhi: Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra says, "We used to say that we are world leaders. We used to say that we are peacemakers. Whether it's the war in Ukraine or the situation today, we should think about it." On the Transgender bill, she says, "I really think that it's unfortunate that they are not sending it to the standing committee. What the community feels is that this bill is going to obliterate their identity, and therefore it was very, very important that they should have been consulted and that this bill that is being brought about should have taken place or should have been passed after proper consultation. I think it's very unfair that the entire community feels like they have not been consulted, and such a big decision is being taken in their context. I wish the government had listened and put it on the standing committee."

ANI

24,199 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

"Why I don't believe in human-made climate change, and why Net Zero is a scam." "Look at China and look at India. Their emissions are skyrocketing and... we're that flat line at the bottom. Yet somehow we're the ones getting punished." "We're banning gas stoves, taxing farmers and paying more for power, while our government expands gas projects and exports coal to China and India." "If it's really about the environment, why are we shipping these so-called fossil fuels to the rest of the world?" "And every time the experts get it wrong, they just move the goalposts." "First it was acid rain, then it was the ozone, then it was global warming, then it was melting ice caps, then it was global boiling, and now it's climate change." "The wording now is so vague they can never be wrong. Too cold? Climate change. Too hot? Climate change. It's not about the weather, it's about... control." "We build entire energy grids from solar and wind, which only work for some of the year and are mostly foreign-owned. That's not sustainability. That is a government-backed scam."

"Why I don't believe in human-made climate change, and why Net Zero is a scam." "Look at China and look at India. Their emissions are skyrocketing and... we're that flat line at the bottom. Yet somehow we're the ones getting punished." "We're banning gas stoves, taxing farmers and paying more for power, while our government expands gas projects and exports coal to China and India." "If it's really about the environment, why are we shipping these so-called fossil fuels to the rest of the world?" "And every time the experts get it wrong, they just move the goalposts." "First it was acid rain, then it was the ozone, then it was global warming, then it was melting ice caps, then it was global boiling, and now it's climate change." "The wording now is so vague they can never be wrong. Too cold? Climate change. Too hot? Climate change. It's not about the weather, it's about... control." "We build entire energy grids from solar and wind, which only work for some of the year and are mostly foreign-owned. That's not sustainability. That is a government-backed scam."

Wide Awake Media

88,309 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Why isn’t it a national scandal that Mamdani is meeting with a friend of the Blind Sheikh? Why do normies speak about mass demographic change only in hushed tones, if at all? Because they’ve been robbed of the vocabulary to talk about it, and are afraid of what it means.

Why isn’t it a national scandal that Mamdani is meeting with a friend of the Blind Sheikh? Why do normies speak about mass demographic change only in hushed tones, if at all? Because they’ve been robbed of the vocabulary to talk about it, and are afraid of what it means.

Lomez

31,853 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

The truth about carbon‼️ "We are in a kind of CO2 famine at the moment"‼️ Dr. William Happer, Professor Emeritus of Physics at Princeton University: "If you look at geological history, most of the time it has been much higher than now"‼️ "Most plants do better with more CO2 than they have now. So calling it a pollutant is a complete distortion of the truth. It is not a pollutant at all"‼️ "People [like Al Gore] saw a way to make money by demonizing CO2, and that's what happened" "Greenhouse operators... intentionally increase the CO2 concentration in the greenhouse by factors of two, three, four... because plants grow much better with more CO2"‼️🙏👇 Credit 👇👇

The truth about carbon‼️ "We are in a kind of CO2 famine at the moment"‼️ Dr. William Happer, Professor Emeritus of Physics at Princeton University: "If you look at geological history, most of the time it has been much higher than now"‼️ "Most plants do better with more CO2 than they have now. So calling it a pollutant is a complete distortion of the truth. It is not a pollutant at all"‼️ "People [like Al Gore] saw a way to make money by demonizing CO2, and that's what happened" "Greenhouse operators... intentionally increase the CO2 concentration in the greenhouse by factors of two, three, four... because plants grow much better with more CO2"‼️🙏👇 Credit 👇👇

Sophia Dahl

14,402 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

NBC News’ Kristen Welker: “You’re talking about 140 million barrels of Iranian oil, and that’s just a little bit more than what the world uses in one day. How much can that really change prices here at home —” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent: “Again, Kristen, terrible framing, terrible framing. No, no, no — prices here at home?” “Let me explain. 140 million barrels — about 20 million barrels a day — comes out of the Gulf. About five million has been the uh, repurposed by the Saudis, by the UAE. So, we’re at a 15 deficit. About 1.5 is Iranian oil that comes out. So, we are at between a 10 and 14 million deficit on a daily basis.” “If you think about 140 million barrels, that’s between 10 days and two weeks of supply. And one of the reasons, one of the reasons that prices in the U.S. of West Texas crude are below $100 — and we have not seen this massive spike as we did during the beginning of Russia/Ukraine — is because we are well supplied in the market, whether it is the Russian oil, whether it is the Iranian oil, or it is the largest the SPR release in history done by a coalition of 32 countries, 400 million barrels.”

NBC News’ Kristen Welker: “You’re talking about 140 million barrels of Iranian oil, and that’s just a little bit more than what the world uses in one day. How much can that really change prices here at home —” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent: “Again, Kristen, terrible framing, terrible framing. No, no, no — prices here at home?” “Let me explain. 140 million barrels — about 20 million barrels a day — comes out of the Gulf. About five million has been the uh, repurposed by the Saudis, by the UAE. So, we’re at a 15 deficit. About 1.5 is Iranian oil that comes out. So, we are at between a 10 and 14 million deficit on a daily basis.” “If you think about 140 million barrels, that’s between 10 days and two weeks of supply. And one of the reasons, one of the reasons that prices in the U.S. of West Texas crude are below $100 — and we have not seen this massive spike as we did during the beginning of Russia/Ukraine — is because we are well supplied in the market, whether it is the Russian oil, whether it is the Iranian oil, or it is the largest the SPR release in history done by a coalition of 32 countries, 400 million barrels.”

RedWave Press

663,700 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Steve Jobs on how to build a great brand After re-joining Apple in 1996, Steve Jobs announced the “Think different” campaign with the following statement: “To me, marketing is about values. This is a very complicated and noisy world. We’re not going to get a chance to get people to remember much about us. No company is. So we have to be really clear on what we want them to know about us.” He cites Nike as one of the greatest jobs of marketing the universe has ever seen: “Remember, Nike sells a commodity—they sell shoes! And yet when you think of Nike, you feel something different than a shoe company. In their ads, they don’t ever talk about the product. They don’t ever tell you about their air soles and why they are better than Reebok’s air soles. What does Nike do in their advertising? They honor great athletes, and they honor great athletics. That’s who they are, that’s what they are about.” Marketing guru Seth Godin also used Nike as an example of great branding in a blog post a few years ago: “If Nike announced that they were opening a hotel, you’d have a pretty good guess about what it would be like. But if Hyatt announced that they were going to start making shoes, you would have NO IDEA WHATSOEVER what those shoes would be like. That’s because Nike owns a brand and Hyatt simply owns real estate.” Jobs goes on to explain how the Apple team arrived at the “Think Different” campaign: “Our customers want to know who is Apple and what is it that we stand for. Where do we fit in this world? What we’re about isn’t making boxes for people to get their jobs done—although we do that well. We do that better than almost anybody, in some cases. But Apple is about something more than that. Apple at the core—its core value—is that we believe people with passion can change the world for the better… And that those people who are crazy enough to think that they can change the world are the ones who actually do.” He continues: “And so, what we’re going to do in our first brand marketing campaign in several years is to get back to that core value. A lot of things have changed. The market is in a totally different place than it was a decade ago, and Apple is totally different… the products and the distribution strategy and the manufacturing are totally different. And we understand that. But values and core values—those things shouldn’t change. The things that Apple believed in, at its core, are the same things that Apple really stands for today.” Apple’s “Think Different” campaign was designed to honor those people who have changed the world. And as Jobs so eloquently put it: “Some of them are living. Some of them are not. But the ones that aren’t, you’ll know that if they ever used a computer, it would’ve been a Mac. The theme of the campaign is ‘Think Different.’ It’s honoring the people who think different and who move this world forward. And it is what we are about. It touches the soul of this company.” If you’re looking to create a great brand, I’d start out by asking: what are your core values and what does your company honor?

Startup Archive

338,105 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

ELON: EVERYONE WAS A SLAVE AT SOME POINT IN HISTORY “I think we want to look to the future rather than the past instead of engaging in constant rehashing of the past. Because, in fact, if you study history broadly, everyone was a slave. Everyone. We are all descended from slaves. It's just a question of when. Was it more recent or less recent? That's it.” Source: Interview with Don Lemon, March 2024

ELON: EVERYONE WAS A SLAVE AT SOME POINT IN HISTORY “I think we want to look to the future rather than the past instead of engaging in constant rehashing of the past. Because, in fact, if you study history broadly, everyone was a slave. Everyone. We are all descended from slaves. It's just a question of when. Was it more recent or less recent? That's it.” Source: Interview with Don Lemon, March 2024

Mario Nawfal

50,128 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Mark Carney lied and he keeps digging! Listen to this word salad. I don’t think it answers why he lied. Check it out. What do you think? Q: You said you weren't the chair anymore when the decision was made, but it was made back in fall, and you wrote a letter about it. How can you square that? CARNEY: Look, there's several elements to the transaction and I should have been more precise in my answer. There's an overall move with a plan of arrangement, and the plan of arrangement and the agreement of all that, which is also true, it's complicated. The corporation and the company, which happened after us was. I think the core though, is, what are we actually talking about? We're talking about the technical change to where the head office is. No difference to any employment. The technical change, no difference to any employment here in Canada, no difference to any of the operations here in Canada. And in fact, on net, what the technical change does is improves the access to capital. Q: It makes you look like you're trying to distance yourself from moving headquarters from Canada to the United States. Why would you do that? CARNEY: As I say, it's a technical change. It enhances the liquidity. Brookfield is a great Canadian company. It's a great Canadian success story. If you look at the company still listed on Toronto, the employees all still here, I would say a number of the employees actually live here in Oakville and, you know, having greater access to capital is a good thing for Canada, good thing for Canadian growth. Q: You've been accused of lying. Did you lie, sir. You said you should have been more precise. CARNEY: There's multiple aspects. Ok some of my - sometimes I answer questions that go into details when I should keep it at a higher level. That's part of the problem with not being a politician.

Mark Carney lied and he keeps digging! Listen to this word salad. I don’t think it answers why he lied. Check it out. What do you think? Q: You said you weren't the chair anymore when the decision was made, but it was made back in fall, and you wrote a letter about it. How can you square that? CARNEY: Look, there's several elements to the transaction and I should have been more precise in my answer. There's an overall move with a plan of arrangement, and the plan of arrangement and the agreement of all that, which is also true, it's complicated. The corporation and the company, which happened after us was. I think the core though, is, what are we actually talking about? We're talking about the technical change to where the head office is. No difference to any employment. The technical change, no difference to any employment here in Canada, no difference to any of the operations here in Canada. And in fact, on net, what the technical change does is improves the access to capital. Q: It makes you look like you're trying to distance yourself from moving headquarters from Canada to the United States. Why would you do that? CARNEY: As I say, it's a technical change. It enhances the liquidity. Brookfield is a great Canadian company. It's a great Canadian success story. If you look at the company still listed on Toronto, the employees all still here, I would say a number of the employees actually live here in Oakville and, you know, having greater access to capital is a good thing for Canada, good thing for Canadian growth. Q: You've been accused of lying. Did you lie, sir. You said you should have been more precise. CARNEY: There's multiple aspects. Ok some of my - sometimes I answer questions that go into details when I should keep it at a higher level. That's part of the problem with not being a politician.

Chris Warkentin

53,944 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The hatefulness of whiteness. We should’ve never integrated with these demonic people. They think it was about being with them when it was really about equality. But they hated it then and they hate it now. That selfish demon spirit will never change. #BlackHistory #NeverForget

The hatefulness of whiteness. We should’ve never integrated with these demonic people. They think it was about being with them when it was really about equality. But they hated it then and they hate it now. That selfish demon spirit will never change. #BlackHistory #NeverForget

Black, Blessed & Unbothered

66,983 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

"F1 has become very popular. what do you think about this change?" lando: "formula one in 2019 was just a very closed sport. you really didn't see much about the people, the drivers, the mechanics, the engineers. you really just saw the show on tv. you saw the racing, and really that was about it. now formula one is a lot more open. there's a lot more fans in the races and paddock. everything i do now, people see. it's on tv, netflix, different series, youtube, it's on every piece of social media, which allows it to grow in a much better way. and i think you see some more fans now that love the people, they love the drivers. they can understand more and relate more to the personalities of each driver in formula one. because it was a very male dominated sport. now most of my fans actually are female and that's an amazing thing that we're able to attract and bring in a younger generation, because they are the future of formula one, and also more variation. so it's a pleasure to be part of that journey"

"F1 has become very popular. what do you think about this change?" lando: "formula one in 2019 was just a very closed sport. you really didn't see much about the people, the drivers, the mechanics, the engineers. you really just saw the show on tv. you saw the racing, and really that was about it. now formula one is a lot more open. there's a lot more fans in the races and paddock. everything i do now, people see. it's on tv, netflix, different series, youtube, it's on every piece of social media, which allows it to grow in a much better way. and i think you see some more fans now that love the people, they love the drivers. they can understand more and relate more to the personalities of each driver in formula one. because it was a very male dominated sport. now most of my fans actually are female and that's an amazing thing that we're able to attract and bring in a younger generation, because they are the future of formula one, and also more variation. so it's a pleasure to be part of that journey"

ray

28,864 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen