Sensitive content
This media may contain sensitive content.
Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
The amazing August Skye August_Skye has her first threesome experience with two men Donny Sinns Donny Sins xxx featured in @thisis50 @thesource and Tyrone Love Tyrone Love. The fireworks explode in this sexual encounter for Evasive Angles! #EvasiveAngles #TTBoyProductions Available now at #freakyfriday #bigass #bigblackass #brownandround #titties #nicetits #blacktits... show more
66,121 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren •via X (Twitter)
0 Kommentare
Keine Kommentare verfügbar
Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt
Ähnliche Videos
0:24
Sensitive content
THIS IS CRAZYYYY ((yet so sweet and soft... 🫠🫠🫠 #เสน่หาวาโย *SPOILERS* :) . . . the quiet of the night filled the air, wrapped them in the rush of love's presence. after waiting, the time had come to express their love more than before. but the current situation felt somewhat clumsy. every action wayo took felt clumsy, as though she couldn't quite proceed. catherine, seeing something was off, pulled back just slightly after their lingering kiss. instead of their love continuing as it should, wayo looked at her with an uncertain gaze, wondering if something was wrong or if an issue had suddenly arisen at such a crucial moment. even as she reached out to undo the buttons on catherine's long white shirt, her hands trembled. though catherine had opened herself completely and cooperated fully, wayo felt her confidence wavering. "you don't have to force yourself" "it's not that. i'm just... nervous" nervous as if she were a novice, unfamiliar with love or intimacy. despite being known as the love coach, wayo was, in fact, rather old-fashioned. she couldn't allow love to be reduced to something fleeting in a moment of passion. if she was with someone, she couldn't take advantage of that relationship without solid commitment, and she'd never been this far with anyone before. blew was the first and last for her... "have you ever had any experience?" "what are you asking?" "you've told me you've had many exes before" "yes, i've dated many people, but it never ended up in bed. despite what you see, i'm very serious. i've cherished and taken care of myself, and now i'm giving it all to you" catherine stared at the earnest, reserved expression of wayo, which contrasted with her usual confident demeanor. right now, wayo's arms wrapped around herself, her posture echoing the gravity of her words. even though wayo had experienced love with others in the past, it didn't make catherine love her any less. as she had said before, she never cared or held onto the past of others as an issue in their present. "but with my exes, there were hugs and kisses... that's why i feel like i'm not pure enough for you" "wayo, there's something i want to tell you now" "what is it?" "i think i'm quite possessive. if i mark you, that means you belong to me. i'll mark every part of you" once she voiced her intention, wayo would go through with it, never hesitating halfway. like their kiss, which resumed with an intensity they hadn't yet expressed before. now, all words ceased to matter. her hands, once trembling, now explored catherine's body gently, as though she were an explorer discovering new territory. her lips pressed softly against catherine's as they lost themselves in the moment, shedding the barriers that had kept them apart, piece by piece, as they worked together to draw closer. with only their naked bodies and two hearts beating in unison, the titles and positions they once held seemed trivial, mere constructs of a world that was no longer relevant. there were no boundaries when they both willingly crossed them. the sensation of their love, at first cool and soothing, soon shifted into a heated rush, blending until they melted into one. when the turmoil finally passed, they found themselves wrapped in a peaceful calm, like a gentle breeze that whispered across them. "my princess" "what will you do?" catherine said softly while still resting her face on the shoulder of the person who held her tightly. after they had shared that sacred moment together, the other person spoke and did something that made her wonder. "at this moment, i'll be your throne" it will be a throne that is soft and gentle, allowing her princess to sit upon it with superiority. all that is needed is for her to give a command, to ask for something, or if she has set her mind to control the game herself, wayo is ready to respond wholeheartedly. until the long night has passed and dawn arrives...
r
114,625 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat
1:33
Sensitive content
Andrea Dworkin appeared in a May 21, 1988 episode of the British late-night talk show ‘After Dark’ titled “What Is Sex For?,” featuring others like Anthony Burgess, Jim Haynes, Julia Ronder, Jack Dominian, and Roz Kaveney. While Dworkin brought up pornography being a multibillion-dollar industry that exploits women and girls, Jim Haynes, who co-launched the counterculture sex newspaper ‘Suck’ in 1969, philosophized about sexual value judgments around pornography. Ironically, even though Burgess won a “Sexist Pig of the Year” award in 1980 from the Female Publishers of Great Britain, he was the least dickish toward Dworkin, and he was relatively thoughtful and receptive toward her ideas. The most tiresome was Dominian. A moment from that episode that I really love is when Dominian, a psychiatrist and lay Roman Catholic theologian (what a combination that is), replied to Dworkin saying that her “thesis is absolutely psychologically unsound.” To which she replied: “I hope so because my respect for psychology is not very great.” Dworkin explained that psychology has functioned in conditioning women to submit to their subordination, so “psychologically unsound” actually sounds fine to her. There are some clips of Dworkin’s responses in that episode on YouTube, which are great to watch. Fortunately, I think feminist uploaders, like “feminist vhs archive,” mostly cut out the men. Such are the small mercies. - - - - - - - - - - DWORKIN: What I have done has been to say: Here is an area of human experience that everyone presumes to know and understand. And, if we women want equality, we have to face the fact that movement after movement of egalitarian agitation has been pushed back and suppressed. Now, why? Yes, let’s look at the politics of economics, but let’s also look at the politics of sexuality. And, in particular, it seems to me that you sort of need to answer this question, at least for me: Why is it that law mandates intercourse as an act for women exactly through the period when women are chattel to men? I think that we have to deal with the fact that intercourse has, is, and has become—and has been—one of the main expressions of the ways in which men own women. And if what we want is more sexual equality, then we have to deal with what intercourse does to us. DOMINIAN: I think your thesis is absolutely psychologically unsound. DWORKIN: I hope so because my respect for psychology is not very great, because of the impact of psychology exactly on trying to deal with questions of women’s inferiority and with psychology’s role in trying to reconcile women to accepting a subordinate status in society. So, I hope that it is not part of it.
Donovan Cleckley
53,930 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten
