Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

The answer wasn't just awaited; it was earned by the question that demanded it. Now listen to Rubika Liyaquat question... and Saurav Das's answer. Thank you, Rubika Ma'am, for asking what so many wanted to ask.

voicesindians's profile picture

Indians

23,238 subscribers

54,484 просмотров • 13 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

Vivek allows protester to ask her question. “You get to finish asking your question but then I’ll answer after that.” Vivek Ramaswamy I’m answering your question, it may not be the answer you want.
5:43

Vivek allows protester to ask her question. “You get to finish asking your question but then I’ll answer after that.” Vivek Ramaswamy I’m answering your question, it may not be the answer you want.

Chris Carapezza

476,648 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Fox News’ Brian Kilmeade: “Are you thinking about taking Khartg Island where 90% of the Iranian oil goes through?” President Trump: “Yeah, but, Brian, I can’t answer a question like that. And you shouldn’t ask it. You shouldn’t even be asking it. It’s one of so many different things. It’s not high on the list, but it’s one of so many different things. And I can change my mind in seconds, but, you know, for you to ask the question — who would answer a question like that? You’re asking me a question. Kharg Island. Who would ask a question like that and what fool would answer it? Let’s say I was gonna do it or I wasn’t gonna do it, what would I tell you? ‘Oh, yes, Brian, I’m thinking about doing it. Let me let you know what time and when it will take place.’ It’s not — you know, it’s sort of a foolish question. A little surprising for you because you’re a smart man.”
1:00

Fox News’ Brian Kilmeade: “Are you thinking about taking Khartg Island where 90% of the Iranian oil goes through?” President Trump: “Yeah, but, Brian, I can’t answer a question like that. And you shouldn’t ask it. You shouldn’t even be asking it. It’s one of so many different things. It’s not high on the list, but it’s one of so many different things. And I can change my mind in seconds, but, you know, for you to ask the question — who would answer a question like that? You’re asking me a question. Kharg Island. Who would ask a question like that and what fool would answer it? Let’s say I was gonna do it or I wasn’t gonna do it, what would I tell you? ‘Oh, yes, Brian, I’m thinking about doing it. Let me let you know what time and when it will take place.’ It’s not — you know, it’s sort of a foolish question. A little surprising for you because you’re a smart man.”

RedWave Press

730,069 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

"I am putting the bar in HELL and you are struggling to reach it! Name for me ONE military directive and don't answer with a question!" Korra: "Okay perfect.. I wasn't going to answer with a question... now let me ASK YOU A QUESTION" 😂 #israel #palestine #debate #gaza #sneako
0:48

"I am putting the bar in HELL and you are struggling to reach it! Name for me ONE military directive and don't answer with a question!" Korra: "Okay perfect.. I wasn't going to answer with a question... now let me ASK YOU A QUESTION" 😂 #israel #palestine #debate #gaza #sneako

ThatOpinionatedGirl

95,479 просмотров • 11 дней назад

"The question I hear many people are beginning to ask themselves is: 'What was Uhuru doing with our money?'. That is a question for him to answer!"~Ruto
5:28

"The question I hear many people are beginning to ask themselves is: 'What was Uhuru doing with our money?'. That is a question for him to answer!"~Ruto

Lightcast TV Kenya

55,374 просмотров • 26 дней назад

MUST WATCH 🚨Fox News’ Brian Kilmeade: “Are you thinking about taking Khartg Island where 90% of the Iranian oil goes through?” President Trump: “Yeah, but, Brian, I can’t answer a question like that. And you shouldn’t ask it. You shouldn’t even be asking it. It’s one of so many different things. It’s not high on the list, but it’s one of so many different things. And I can change my mind in seconds, but, you know, for you to ask the question — who would answer a question like that? You’re asking me a question. Kharg Island. Who would ask a question like that and what fool would answer it? Let’s say I was gonna do it or I wasn’t gonna do it, what would I tell you? ‘Oh, yes, Brian, I’m thinking about doing it. Let me let you know what time and when it will take place.’ It’s not — you know, it’s sort of a foolish question. A little surprising for you because you’re a smart man.”
1:00

MUST WATCH 🚨Fox News’ Brian Kilmeade: “Are you thinking about taking Khartg Island where 90% of the Iranian oil goes through?” President Trump: “Yeah, but, Brian, I can’t answer a question like that. And you shouldn’t ask it. You shouldn’t even be asking it. It’s one of so many different things. It’s not high on the list, but it’s one of so many different things. And I can change my mind in seconds, but, you know, for you to ask the question — who would answer a question like that? You’re asking me a question. Kharg Island. Who would ask a question like that and what fool would answer it? Let’s say I was gonna do it or I wasn’t gonna do it, what would I tell you? ‘Oh, yes, Brian, I’m thinking about doing it. Let me let you know what time and when it will take place.’ It’s not — you know, it’s sort of a foolish question. A little surprising for you because you’re a smart man.”

Dr Charlie Ward

67,962 просмотров • 23 дней назад

Today was the first chance media had a chance to ask #Eagles HC #NickSirianni about #AJBrown. I want to make it clear I think Sirianni is a very good coach but so many times he really is coached and doesn't answer the question. I will ask you did Nick Sirianni answer this question that had to be asked?
2:30

Today was the first chance media had a chance to ask #Eagles HC #NickSirianni about #AJBrown. I want to make it clear I think Sirianni is a very good coach but so many times he really is coached and doesn't answer the question. I will ask you did Nick Sirianni answer this question that had to be asked?

Howard Eskin

18,233 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Phillip to Jennings: When you answer my question with a question, you are dodging. Answer the question. It is very telling that you are not able to entertain an answer.
1:16

Phillip to Jennings: When you answer my question with a question, you are dodging. Answer the question. It is very telling that you are not able to entertain an answer.

Acyn

162,856 просмотров • 1 год назад

Good Morning X Not asking you to answer, just to understand the tactic for the question.
1:17

Good Morning X Not asking you to answer, just to understand the tactic for the question.

Vincent Kennedy

86,125 просмотров • 1 год назад

“One day this war will end. And history won’t ask what we said, it will ask what we did. Ukraine is answering that question. Now it’s time for the rest of us to answer it too.” Prince Harry​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ at the Kyiv Security Forum today. Thank you! 🇺🇦
0:23

“One day this war will end. And history won’t ask what we said, it will ask what we did. Ukraine is answering that question. Now it’s time for the rest of us to answer it too.” Prince Harry​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ at the Kyiv Security Forum today. Thank you! 🇺🇦

Maria Avdeeva

111,929 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

What if you never had to answer the same question twice? Delphi, you can now create a digital version of you - just by being interviewed. It learns how you think and what you know, so it can answer questions and connect with others 24/7, in your voice
1:08

What if you never had to answer the same question twice? Delphi, you can now create a digital version of you - just by being interviewed. It learns how you think and what you know, so it can answer questions and connect with others 24/7, in your voice

Dara

42,416 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

Jeremy Corbell says he was told by someone in ODNI that Dylan Borland testified about a UFO program called “Rubik’s Cube” Borland’s response👇🏼 Borland -“I can neither confirm or deny, but if you want me to answer that question, ask for amnesty for the whistleblowers, ask Congress and the executive branch to give it to us, and I'll answer that question” Shitty camera footage by some caveman 😂
1:51

Jeremy Corbell says he was told by someone in ODNI that Dylan Borland testified about a UFO program called “Rubik’s Cube” Borland’s response👇🏼 Borland -“I can neither confirm or deny, but if you want me to answer that question, ask for amnesty for the whistleblowers, ask Congress and the executive branch to give it to us, and I'll answer that question” Shitty camera footage by some caveman 😂

neandrewthal

207,543 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

BREAKING - EXPLOSIVE: Republican Congressman Jim Jordan (Rep. Jim Jordan) confronts Dr. Fauci on alleged COVID-19 cover-up and outright lies. WATCH Question: Thank you, Mister Chairman. Doctor, why was it so important that the virus not have started in a lab? Answer: We don't know where it started. And that's the reason why I keep an open mind. So I don't know what you mean by why was it so important. It wasn't important. Question: You still don't know where it started. The guys you gave money to figured out in three days. Answer: No, no, no. They said, Mister Anderson said on January 31, 2020, virus looks engineered, virus not consistent with evolutionary theory. The very next day, Doctor Gerry said, I don't know how this happens in nature. It'd be easy to do in a lab. And then three days later, Shazam, they switched and say it has to be nature. So they figured out in three days. But you still don't know. Answer: No. In fact, if you look at what they were saying, Congressman Jordan, they were saying that it was not a manufactured virus. It still could have evolved out of a lab. Question: Let me read something here to you. They're not incompatible. In our study on the censorship of the Biden administration working with big tech, I want to read you a WhatsApp message from Mark Zuckerberg. Can we include that? The White House put pressure on us to censor the lab leak theory? Answer: Is there a question? Question: Here's another email to Mark Zuckerberg. It says, subject line COVID misinformation, Wuhan lab leak theory. Due to continued public pressure and tense conversations with the new administration, we started removing five COVID claims, including the lab leak theory. Mister Zuckerberg responds, this seems like a good reminder that when we compromise our standards due to pressure from an administration in either direction, we often later regret it. Why was it so important the virus not have started in a lab? Answer: It wasn't so important that the virus not. We don't know. Question: We know it was important to someone in the Biden administration. So much so that the top people at Meta, the top people at Facebook are asking, why are we getting all this pressure to downplay the lab leak theory? And we have an email from June of the same year, June 4, 2021, saying the same thing. It was certainly important to somebody. Answer: Well, what does that got to do with me? Question: I'm asking you because you're the expert on the coronavirus. I'm saying, why was the administration so pushing not to have the lab leak theory as something that was viable? Answer: I can answer that. I've kept an open mind throughout the entire time. Question: Doctor Fauci. Open mind. Answer: That is correct. Question: What happened in those three days? Why did Mister Anderson and Doctor Gerry, why did they change their mind in 180 degrees? Because what Christian Andersen says three days later after he said virus looks engineered, virus not consistent with evolutionary theory, three days later, he says the main crackpot theories going around at the moment relate to this virus being somehow engineered. And that is demonstrably false. Question: How did they figure all that out in three days? Answer: Well, what they did is that, you know, they testified before this committee what they did. They went back and looked at the sequences and realized that their initial concern was unfounded about that. And it did not look at all like it was manufactured. Question: But in three days, they figured that out? Answer: Exactly. You could do that in three days. You can scan sequences in a day. You don't need three days. Question: Okay, who's Robert Redfield? Answer: The former director of the CDC. Question: Doctor Redfield. Right. And he was also in the coronavirus task force. Is that accurate? Answer: He was a member of the coronavirus task force. Question: Here's what he said to this committee. He said, Redfield said that Fauci and Collins left him out because Redfield suspected that coronavirus had leaked from the Chinese lab. Is that accurate? Answer: Well, he said that, but that's not true. That is incorrect. Question: Congressman, Doctor Redfield's lying to the committee? Answer: When he sat right where you sat when he said that I kept him out. That is an incorrect statement. Question: The roster who was on the phone, was Doctor Redfield in that conference call on February 1 when you had Mister Anderson and Doctor Gerry on that call? Answer: He was not. And the conference call was put together by Jeremy Farrar. So no one kept him out. Question: He said he was kept out because did US tax dollars. Answer: You want me to answer the question? Question: Yeah. I would just wonder why it wasn't on the call. It seems to me the head of CDC, part of the coronavirus task force, which was formed two days prior to that call, would have been on the call. Answer: Well, the call was arranged by Jeremy Farrar. You should ask him. Question: Okay. Did US tax dollars flow through a grant recipient to the lab in China? Answer: I'm sorry, what was? Question: Did US tax dollars flow through a grant recipient to the lab in China? Answer: Yes, of course. It was a sub-award to the Wuhan Institute. Question: And who approved that award? Answer: Excuse me? Question: And who approved that award? Answer: What agency approved that award? Answer: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Question: Your agency approved that, right? Answer: Yes, it did. Question: Does that have anything to do with this downplaying of the lab leak theory? Answer: No, nothing to do with it. Question: Nothing. Do you agree that there was a push to downplay the lab leak theory? Answer: Not on my part. Question: Really? Really. Wow. Wow. I think most of the country find that amazing. Answer: I've kept an open mind throughout the entire process. Question: All right, I yield back.
5:43

BREAKING - EXPLOSIVE: Republican Congressman Jim Jordan (Rep. Jim Jordan) confronts Dr. Fauci on alleged COVID-19 cover-up and outright lies. WATCH Question: Thank you, Mister Chairman. Doctor, why was it so important that the virus not have started in a lab? Answer: We don't know where it started. And that's the reason why I keep an open mind. So I don't know what you mean by why was it so important. It wasn't important. Question: You still don't know where it started. The guys you gave money to figured out in three days. Answer: No, no, no. They said, Mister Anderson said on January 31, 2020, virus looks engineered, virus not consistent with evolutionary theory. The very next day, Doctor Gerry said, I don't know how this happens in nature. It'd be easy to do in a lab. And then three days later, Shazam, they switched and say it has to be nature. So they figured out in three days. But you still don't know. Answer: No. In fact, if you look at what they were saying, Congressman Jordan, they were saying that it was not a manufactured virus. It still could have evolved out of a lab. Question: Let me read something here to you. They're not incompatible. In our study on the censorship of the Biden administration working with big tech, I want to read you a WhatsApp message from Mark Zuckerberg. Can we include that? The White House put pressure on us to censor the lab leak theory? Answer: Is there a question? Question: Here's another email to Mark Zuckerberg. It says, subject line COVID misinformation, Wuhan lab leak theory. Due to continued public pressure and tense conversations with the new administration, we started removing five COVID claims, including the lab leak theory. Mister Zuckerberg responds, this seems like a good reminder that when we compromise our standards due to pressure from an administration in either direction, we often later regret it. Why was it so important the virus not have started in a lab? Answer: It wasn't so important that the virus not. We don't know. Question: We know it was important to someone in the Biden administration. So much so that the top people at Meta, the top people at Facebook are asking, why are we getting all this pressure to downplay the lab leak theory? And we have an email from June of the same year, June 4, 2021, saying the same thing. It was certainly important to somebody. Answer: Well, what does that got to do with me? Question: I'm asking you because you're the expert on the coronavirus. I'm saying, why was the administration so pushing not to have the lab leak theory as something that was viable? Answer: I can answer that. I've kept an open mind throughout the entire time. Question: Doctor Fauci. Open mind. Answer: That is correct. Question: What happened in those three days? Why did Mister Anderson and Doctor Gerry, why did they change their mind in 180 degrees? Because what Christian Andersen says three days later after he said virus looks engineered, virus not consistent with evolutionary theory, three days later, he says the main crackpot theories going around at the moment relate to this virus being somehow engineered. And that is demonstrably false. Question: How did they figure all that out in three days? Answer: Well, what they did is that, you know, they testified before this committee what they did. They went back and looked at the sequences and realized that their initial concern was unfounded about that. And it did not look at all like it was manufactured. Question: But in three days, they figured that out? Answer: Exactly. You could do that in three days. You can scan sequences in a day. You don't need three days. Question: Okay, who's Robert Redfield? Answer: The former director of the CDC. Question: Doctor Redfield. Right. And he was also in the coronavirus task force. Is that accurate? Answer: He was a member of the coronavirus task force. Question: Here's what he said to this committee. He said, Redfield said that Fauci and Collins left him out because Redfield suspected that coronavirus had leaked from the Chinese lab. Is that accurate? Answer: Well, he said that, but that's not true. That is incorrect. Question: Congressman, Doctor Redfield's lying to the committee? Answer: When he sat right where you sat when he said that I kept him out. That is an incorrect statement. Question: The roster who was on the phone, was Doctor Redfield in that conference call on February 1 when you had Mister Anderson and Doctor Gerry on that call? Answer: He was not. And the conference call was put together by Jeremy Farrar. So no one kept him out. Question: He said he was kept out because did US tax dollars. Answer: You want me to answer the question? Question: Yeah. I would just wonder why it wasn't on the call. It seems to me the head of CDC, part of the coronavirus task force, which was formed two days prior to that call, would have been on the call. Answer: Well, the call was arranged by Jeremy Farrar. You should ask him. Question: Okay. Did US tax dollars flow through a grant recipient to the lab in China? Answer: I'm sorry, what was? Question: Did US tax dollars flow through a grant recipient to the lab in China? Answer: Yes, of course. It was a sub-award to the Wuhan Institute. Question: And who approved that award? Answer: Excuse me? Question: And who approved that award? Answer: What agency approved that award? Answer: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. Question: Your agency approved that, right? Answer: Yes, it did. Question: Does that have anything to do with this downplaying of the lab leak theory? Answer: No, nothing to do with it. Question: Nothing. Do you agree that there was a push to downplay the lab leak theory? Answer: Not on my part. Question: Really? Really. Wow. Wow. I think most of the country find that amazing. Answer: I've kept an open mind throughout the entire process. Question: All right, I yield back.

Simon Ateba

997,322 просмотров • 2 лет назад

Caine: There's a lot in that question. I'd love to take that offline and answer it, but it was I'm struggling to find exactly what your question was. And that's probably me, not you. Hegseth: It was an indictment framed as a question.
2:42

Caine: There's a lot in that question. I'd love to take that offline and answer it, but it was I'm struggling to find exactly what your question was. And that's probably me, not you. Hegseth: It was an indictment framed as a question.

Acyn

115,344 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

It was so fitting that the last and most devastating question of this debate was made by a mormon to Ethan Muse, who absolutely destroyed Luke’s entire case. Thanks Ethan for the answer, and I guess thanks Thoughtful-Faith for the question…
4:18

It was so fitting that the last and most devastating question of this debate was made by a mormon to Ethan Muse, who absolutely destroyed Luke’s entire case. Thanks Ethan for the answer, and I guess thanks Thoughtful-Faith for the question…

Igor Aguiar

17,341 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

If you ask a question of someone and really want to know the answer, why do you not listen to the person you asked?
7:00

If you ask a question of someone and really want to know the answer, why do you not listen to the person you asked?

GABRIEL 🪽

20,238 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

What makes a CG human believable? It took decades to answer that question. Among the many teams to hunt for a solution was Pixar. And it found one -- after lots of trial and error. We explore: ─➤
0:43

What makes a CG human believable? It took decades to answer that question. Among the many teams to hunt for a solution was Pixar. And it found one -- after lots of trial and error. We explore: ─➤

Animation Obsessive

59,187 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Listen to this young man ask the public one simple question…. “If you were in your twenties today what would you do” They all say EMIGRATE, hardly surprising though is it. How would you answer his Question?
1:05

Listen to this young man ask the public one simple question…. “If you were in your twenties today what would you do” They all say EMIGRATE, hardly surprising though is it. How would you answer his Question?

Benonwine

55,336 просмотров • 9 месяцев назад