正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

The Asch conformity experiments (1951-1956) people conform for two main reasons: they want to fit in with the group and because they believe the group is more informed than they are [read more:

900,782 次观看 • 3 年前 •via X (Twitter)

10 条评论

SwaziBoy🇸🇿🇿🇦🇬🇧🇺🇸 的头像
SwaziBoy🇸🇿🇿🇦🇬🇧🇺🇸3 年前

I definitely don't do this. Maybe that's why I don't have many friends.

IchiK🇯🇵 的头像
IchiK🇯🇵3 年前

This is extremely scary and explains a lot about what’s going on right now in our society

Thyme Parzival 的头像
Thyme Parzival3 年前

Perhaps the rise in neurodiversity, which tends to be related to non-conforming behavior, is an evolutionary advantage in a society controlled by groupthink.

Nina Wildflower 的头像
Nina Wildflower3 年前

To resist pressures to conform, it helps if you have allies - it's why all those masked selfies help. It also helps if you imagine that, although you might be in the minority RIGHT HERE RIGHT NOW, there are lots of people in other countries who are wearing masks.

Renmarkable1🇺🇦🇨🇦YES also bluesky 的头像
Renmarkable1🇺🇦🇨🇦YES also bluesky3 年前

we see it in real life right now. it's why people won't mask.

Mark Rubin 的头像
Mark Rubin3 年前

That makes sense. Conformity is part of herd behavior. People feel safe around other people who perceive danger and safety through shared stories.

Brad Webb 的头像
Brad Webb3 年前

This is how easy it is to control people. They put up minimal resistance. What they think is cool, attractive in a partner, what to consume, who to like, who to hate, who to vote for, "good" music(WAP 🙄 ) and most other things are literally programmed. There is very little individuality in roughly 80% of people according to studies. Your own experiences confirm this if you are honest. Why is it popular now to be pierced up and tattooed up now, when it was 30+ years ago? 1930s to 1950s? 1960s to 1980s? No? Ask yourself why high heels look better. The answers are absurdly illogical. Provide them with the medical data showing they ruin bodies and they don't care. Social credit and fitting in with the group are all that matters.

juneroots 的头像
juneroots3 年前

i would not conform, what does that say about me?

gazadventures 的头像
gazadventures3 年前

So interesting, thanks for sharing.

Benjamin Way 的头像
Benjamin Way3 年前

An interesting read that breaks down these rules that control hierarchy movement “48 laws of power” You have to add human empathy imo but it’s a good read nonetheless They’re old as time.

相关视频

🚨 How Fraudulent Actors Are Created and Curated in Academia “Did Jason Arday’s PhD examiners actually read his thesis? And did the electors who appointed him to a Cambridge professorship read his work?” — Richard Dawkins (Richard Dawkins) ⚠️ The answer points to a deeper systemic failure. Fraudsters such as Jason Arday, Elisabeth M. Bik, Theo Baker, and others do not rise and remain protected by accident. They climb the ladder for far too long because reckless, compromised journalism creates a powerful conformity, which in turn produces a protective layer of complicit academics. 📌 This is precisely what the classic Asch conformity experiments (1951–1956) demonstrated. In those studies, ordinary people abandoned clear evidence and conformed to a false majority view simply to fit in. The same psychological mechanism now operates in academia. Despite layers of evidence documenting fraud, lies, deception, hypocrisy and conflicts of interest involving figures such as Jason Arday, Elisabeth M. Bik (Elisabeth Bik), Lonni Besançon (Lonni Besançon 🇫🇷 🇸🇪), Ivan Oransky (Ivan Oransky), Theo Baker (Theo Baker), and Holden Thorp (Holden Thorp, dormant account), most of them continue to survive serious scrutiny — while even the partial consequences faced by Arday came only after prolonged institutional resistance. Academics become complicit for two main reasons: 1. They want to fit in with the mainstream narrative manufactured by reckless, compromised journalists. 2. They overestimate how informed those journalists actually are, and therefore refuse to question the approved story. The result is a self-reinforcing system in which clear evidence is ignored, whistleblowers are attacked, and fraudulent actors are protected and elevated. Until this conformity is broken, the cycle will continue. ScienceGuardians 🔱 Empowering the Academic Community 🔱

ScienceGuardians

50,119 次观看 • 1 个月前