Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

The BBC insists the debate about English identity is "deeply contentious." No, it isn't. There is no debate. Being English is a matter of ancestry. You can't self-identity as a different ethnic group, just as I can't magically become a woman by wearing a dress and calling myself Gertrude....

Con_Tomlinson's profile picture

Connor Tomlinson

122,542 subscribers

28,902 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Yorum

Yorum bulunmuyor

Orijinal gönderinin yorumları burada görünecek

Benzer Videolar

Despite constantly reciting the mantra of "colorblindness" to their White base and claiming that "the GOP doesn't do identity politics," in reality, it enthusiastically embraces the racial identity of every group other than White people. They have racial coalitions, racial community centers, racial campaign signs - racial everything you can imagine - but never for White people. The GOP won't even mention "White people" by name unless it's to condemn us as "supremacists," or to point out the hypocrisy of some "White liberal” where the word "White" is attached as an insult. And as they pander to the racial identity and racial interests of every group other than Whites, any White person who notices and asks “why” is excommunicated as a "RACIST.” The GOP is merely the other side of the anti-White shit sandwich. Both sides of the uniparty are all-in on post-White America. No one is “baiting White people into identity politics.” Everything achieved by the architects of America's decline has relied exactly upon the absence of White racial consciousness. Their greatest achievement is turning a 90% White America into a 50% White America in 60 years - the largest, fastest demographic decimation in world history. And they aim to continue that trajectory. A system that considers our existence its greatest threat must be considered the greatest threat to us. The last thing it wants is for us to see it for what it is and, therein, finally see ourselves and what's been done to us. There is nothing this system works harder to suppress - and cracks down on with greater force - than any outward expression of White racial consciousness. It will continue to do so, and, in turn, our consciousness will continue to rise. And fits of apoplexy at this inevitability will continue from the Progressive Left and the Fake Right.
1:44

Despite constantly reciting the mantra of "colorblindness" to their White base and claiming that "the GOP doesn't do identity politics," in reality, it enthusiastically embraces the racial identity of every group other than White people. They have racial coalitions, racial community centers, racial campaign signs - racial everything you can imagine - but never for White people. The GOP won't even mention "White people" by name unless it's to condemn us as "supremacists," or to point out the hypocrisy of some "White liberal” where the word "White" is attached as an insult. And as they pander to the racial identity and racial interests of every group other than Whites, any White person who notices and asks “why” is excommunicated as a "RACIST.” The GOP is merely the other side of the anti-White shit sandwich. Both sides of the uniparty are all-in on post-White America. No one is “baiting White people into identity politics.” Everything achieved by the architects of America's decline has relied exactly upon the absence of White racial consciousness. Their greatest achievement is turning a 90% White America into a 50% White America in 60 years - the largest, fastest demographic decimation in world history. And they aim to continue that trajectory. A system that considers our existence its greatest threat must be considered the greatest threat to us. The last thing it wants is for us to see it for what it is and, therein, finally see ourselves and what's been done to us. There is nothing this system works harder to suppress - and cracks down on with greater force - than any outward expression of White racial consciousness. It will continue to do so, and, in turn, our consciousness will continue to rise. And fits of apoplexy at this inevitability will continue from the Progressive Left and the Fake Right.

Daniel Concannon

15,909 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

News that white Britons will become a minority in their own country by 2063 was met with the predictable question, “But how does this affect you personally? “Who cares that Britain is on course to be ‘minority white’?” Anand Menon wrote in The Independent. (That would be the white British themselves, Menon.) Why is the concern of the white British for the security and prosperity of their people and their culture being diminished as a “dog whistle”, when those of any other demographic group in Britain are a concern which occupies so much time and energy in politics? On ethnicity, identity, culture, and the continued bad-faith of Fraser Nelson.
22:31

News that white Britons will become a minority in their own country by 2063 was met with the predictable question, “But how does this affect you personally? “Who cares that Britain is on course to be ‘minority white’?” Anand Menon wrote in The Independent. (That would be the white British themselves, Menon.) Why is the concern of the white British for the security and prosperity of their people and their culture being diminished as a “dog whistle”, when those of any other demographic group in Britain are a concern which occupies so much time and energy in politics? On ethnicity, identity, culture, and the continued bad-faith of Fraser Nelson.

Connor Tomlinson

22,589 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Sectarian Gaza candidates are a natural result of mass immigration of strong cultures into a continent which had lost confidence in its own. Had Europe maintained a strong identity and a dominant culture, perhaps integration would have been possible, and imported minority cultures would not have been able to become dominant. Clearly, British students are in fact able to find meaning in identity, but they are unable to find it in being British because they have no sense of what that is. In many cases they now find their identity in the culture that, despite being a minority culture, is a strong and therefore meaningful one (to them). They find identity and meaning in being pro Palestine, anti Israel, pro mass immigration and, importantly, anti anyone who doesn’t conform to it. By making that demand for conformity very clear to others, there is a generation of young people, in particular young women, whose political stances are based on the pressure to conform to this identity. Their conformity is rewarded with the power of becoming an enforcer, making the identity even more appealing.
1:30

Sectarian Gaza candidates are a natural result of mass immigration of strong cultures into a continent which had lost confidence in its own. Had Europe maintained a strong identity and a dominant culture, perhaps integration would have been possible, and imported minority cultures would not have been able to become dominant. Clearly, British students are in fact able to find meaning in identity, but they are unable to find it in being British because they have no sense of what that is. In many cases they now find their identity in the culture that, despite being a minority culture, is a strong and therefore meaningful one (to them). They find identity and meaning in being pro Palestine, anti Israel, pro mass immigration and, importantly, anti anyone who doesn’t conform to it. By making that demand for conformity very clear to others, there is a generation of young people, in particular young women, whose political stances are based on the pressure to conform to this identity. Their conformity is rewarded with the power of becoming an enforcer, making the identity even more appealing.

Connie Shaw

16,456 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

We're circling the drain on the definition of being British now. When asked by podcaster Elliot Bewick what British identity means, Kemi Badenoch said it is a matter of abiding by cultural norms, standards, and laws. This is an incoherent, unsustainable definition. It precludes the possibility for people to be traitors — villains in our national story. It tries to make being British a normative category which is purely good things. And that just isn't true. Being British is a matter of having English, Welsh, Scottish, or Irish ancestry. Reducing British identity to a matter of self-identification marginalises relevant questions of ancestry, loyalty, and how national identity becomes more salient when confronted with its opposites. The arguments have been made. The civic nationalist, values-based case for British identity falls apart under scrutiny. Culture and countries are the properties of the peoples who invent them and pass them on via inheritance to their descendants. I refuse to lie because some people feel excluded by their inability to be British, no matter how good a person they are.
54:16

We're circling the drain on the definition of being British now. When asked by podcaster Elliot Bewick what British identity means, Kemi Badenoch said it is a matter of abiding by cultural norms, standards, and laws. This is an incoherent, unsustainable definition. It precludes the possibility for people to be traitors — villains in our national story. It tries to make being British a normative category which is purely good things. And that just isn't true. Being British is a matter of having English, Welsh, Scottish, or Irish ancestry. Reducing British identity to a matter of self-identification marginalises relevant questions of ancestry, loyalty, and how national identity becomes more salient when confronted with its opposites. The arguments have been made. The civic nationalist, values-based case for British identity falls apart under scrutiny. Culture and countries are the properties of the peoples who invent them and pass them on via inheritance to their descendants. I refuse to lie because some people feel excluded by their inability to be British, no matter how good a person they are.

Connor Tomlinson

25,189 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

.Matt Goodwin speaks to Michael Gove on the ethnicity debate. “My view is Englishness is an ethnicity that is deeply rooted in a people that can trace their roots back over generations. It is a very distinctive identity and a different identity from Britishness...” “... Our history, the legacy of our collective identity, the legacy of our culture, goes much further back and is deeper than simply signing some papers.” “Rishi Sunak could choose to identity as English if he views himself that way. But it is also true that there’s an English ethnicity, there is an English group, that goes back over generations, [and] that Rishi Sunak would probably himself say, ‘I do not have as strong a linkage to that group as other people do’.”
2:23

.Matt Goodwin speaks to Michael Gove on the ethnicity debate. “My view is Englishness is an ethnicity that is deeply rooted in a people that can trace their roots back over generations. It is a very distinctive identity and a different identity from Britishness...” “... Our history, the legacy of our collective identity, the legacy of our culture, goes much further back and is deeper than simply signing some papers.” “Rishi Sunak could choose to identity as English if he views himself that way. But it is also true that there’s an English ethnicity, there is an English group, that goes back over generations, [and] that Rishi Sunak would probably himself say, ‘I do not have as strong a linkage to that group as other people do’.”

Laurie Wastell

377,094 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

White national identities are treated as purely civic by the same migrants who often harbour their own ethnic identity. Political scientist Eric Kaufmann describes this as asymmetrical multiculturalism, one side gets both ethnic and civic layers; the other is told their identity must be diluted into the civic container to make room. "Ethnic identity politics for me, but not for thee, whitey" Ethnic minorities are encouraged to maintain strong identities, enclaves, heritage pride, and group solidarity while the native White majority is pressured to treat their national identity as open to anyone who holds a passport/values as a set of abstract rules, and are forced legally and socially to downplay and pathologise any ethnic/cultural particularism of their own. But it wasn't always like this in Australia, older groups (Italians/Greeks) operated in a more symmetric rivalry, mutual othering ("skips vs wogs") that actually reinforced a clear Australian ethnic core through contrast and boundary maintenance. They were culturally and phenotypically closer (European, Christian background), arrived in smaller waves before official multiculturalism, and could engage in reciprocal ribbing without threatening the core identity. Greater similarity made the voluntary dissimilarity healthy and self-reinforcing rather than existential.
1:13

White national identities are treated as purely civic by the same migrants who often harbour their own ethnic identity. Political scientist Eric Kaufmann describes this as asymmetrical multiculturalism, one side gets both ethnic and civic layers; the other is told their identity must be diluted into the civic container to make room. "Ethnic identity politics for me, but not for thee, whitey" Ethnic minorities are encouraged to maintain strong identities, enclaves, heritage pride, and group solidarity while the native White majority is pressured to treat their national identity as open to anyone who holds a passport/values as a set of abstract rules, and are forced legally and socially to downplay and pathologise any ethnic/cultural particularism of their own. But it wasn't always like this in Australia, older groups (Italians/Greeks) operated in a more symmetric rivalry, mutual othering ("skips vs wogs") that actually reinforced a clear Australian ethnic core through contrast and boundary maintenance. They were culturally and phenotypically closer (European, Christian background), arrived in smaller waves before official multiculturalism, and could engage in reciprocal ribbing without threatening the core identity. Greater similarity made the voluntary dissimilarity healthy and self-reinforcing rather than existential.

auspill

35,091 görüntüleme • 2 ay önce

Identity politics aren't bad. They're human. They're normal. They're inevitable. But for the sake of argument, let's play along and pretend that identity politics are inherently bad. Okay, where are we at in the scope of identity politics in America right now? Literally every group other than White people does identity politics. Now, do you believe for one second that you're going to stop every non-White group from doing identity politics? No, you don't. And virtually no “Conservative” talking head condemns identity politics for anyone other than White people. In fact, Most “Conservative influencers” of recent decades have heavily promoted identity politics for everyone other than White people, with the official GOP foremost among them. So in a world where it's a foregone conclusion that every non-White group will perpetuate identity politics, what good could it POSSIBLY do White people to continue being browbeaten and subverted into refusing identity politics? None. It will only get us further victimized, disenfranchised, and demographically decimated. If someone launches war on your nation, that's bad. But if you have no organized fighting force with which to respond - with which to take your own side in that war - then you're going to be destroyed. Fighting back doesn't make you bad. Taking your own side doesn't make you evil. Refusing to do those things, however, makes you weak. It makes you easy prey. The evildoer in this equation is the person who tells you that your survival instinct is evil, not you for exercising it. Until 1965, the United States was a ~90% White nation. That nation has been largely destroyed. The war on White America is ongoing, and we still have legions of influencers lecturing White people - and lecturing ONLY White people - about the evil of identity politics. They're telling the invaded nation that it's evil to raise an army to fight off the foreign invasion. They're a corner man blindfolding his boxer and tying his hands behind his back while assuring him that self-defense is evil and being beaten to death is a moral victory. “You just can't have a country of 350 million this diverse of just warring ethnicities because then it's just Rwanda.” He should have stopped after “You just can't have a country of 350 million this diverse.” That would be the correct observation of reality, and explain exactly why the powers that be have done all they can to “diversify” this country over the last 60 years - because they understood that “Diversity + Proximity = War,” and demographics are a main front in their War On White People. “And the people with the most force just kill the others.” Or, in the case of modern America, the people with the highest in-group preference dominate, the people allowed to pursue identity politics prosper, and the only group denied identity - White people - are preyed upon while being forced to fund all the above. Tucker Carlson famously said: “Whites are gonna be in the minority. You're gonna get people standing up and saying 'I represent White people!' And I'm gonna tell that person to fuck off.” The reason Whites are going to be in the minority - the reason White children are ALREADY a minority - is because Whites have been indoctrinated against the same identity politics that have been instilled in every other group. Yet still, every day, someone comes along and tells White people not to do identity politics. And to this, an ever-increasing number of us say; fuck off.
2:42

Identity politics aren't bad. They're human. They're normal. They're inevitable. But for the sake of argument, let's play along and pretend that identity politics are inherently bad. Okay, where are we at in the scope of identity politics in America right now? Literally every group other than White people does identity politics. Now, do you believe for one second that you're going to stop every non-White group from doing identity politics? No, you don't. And virtually no “Conservative” talking head condemns identity politics for anyone other than White people. In fact, Most “Conservative influencers” of recent decades have heavily promoted identity politics for everyone other than White people, with the official GOP foremost among them. So in a world where it's a foregone conclusion that every non-White group will perpetuate identity politics, what good could it POSSIBLY do White people to continue being browbeaten and subverted into refusing identity politics? None. It will only get us further victimized, disenfranchised, and demographically decimated. If someone launches war on your nation, that's bad. But if you have no organized fighting force with which to respond - with which to take your own side in that war - then you're going to be destroyed. Fighting back doesn't make you bad. Taking your own side doesn't make you evil. Refusing to do those things, however, makes you weak. It makes you easy prey. The evildoer in this equation is the person who tells you that your survival instinct is evil, not you for exercising it. Until 1965, the United States was a ~90% White nation. That nation has been largely destroyed. The war on White America is ongoing, and we still have legions of influencers lecturing White people - and lecturing ONLY White people - about the evil of identity politics. They're telling the invaded nation that it's evil to raise an army to fight off the foreign invasion. They're a corner man blindfolding his boxer and tying his hands behind his back while assuring him that self-defense is evil and being beaten to death is a moral victory. “You just can't have a country of 350 million this diverse of just warring ethnicities because then it's just Rwanda.” He should have stopped after “You just can't have a country of 350 million this diverse.” That would be the correct observation of reality, and explain exactly why the powers that be have done all they can to “diversify” this country over the last 60 years - because they understood that “Diversity + Proximity = War,” and demographics are a main front in their War On White People. “And the people with the most force just kill the others.” Or, in the case of modern America, the people with the highest in-group preference dominate, the people allowed to pursue identity politics prosper, and the only group denied identity - White people - are preyed upon while being forced to fund all the above. Tucker Carlson famously said: “Whites are gonna be in the minority. You're gonna get people standing up and saying 'I represent White people!' And I'm gonna tell that person to fuck off.” The reason Whites are going to be in the minority - the reason White children are ALREADY a minority - is because Whites have been indoctrinated against the same identity politics that have been instilled in every other group. Yet still, every day, someone comes along and tells White people not to do identity politics. And to this, an ever-increasing number of us say; fuck off.

Daniel Concannon

31,527 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Auron MacIntyre's views on race are totally incoherent. Auron MacIntyre is a conservative opposed to White identity politics. Because his audience is more radical, he has to use pilpul to spread his message that White identity politics is evil. Here, he tells Tucker that thinking of people by race is a modern "vulgarisation" - not true, actually the modern innovation is the distinction between ethnicity and race that Auron insists on. Auron claims the real identities of Americans should be the hundreds of smaller ethnicities of the immigrants that arrived there. The Amish and Orthodox Jews are apparently good examples of what communities in America should look like. But then later in his interview, he says to be an American is to adopt an Anglo-Protestant culture, and any groups can be absorbed into it. So Auron is at once decrying Sicilians and Swedes dropping their ethnic identity to enter a more generic White category, while also complaining that the system has stopped attempting to absorb new groups into the foundational identity. Of course this is all stupid. What ethnic identity is Auron? The idea that the European groups that make up White America would keep their European identities through centuries without any ethnogenesis is ridiculous. Auron also scoffs at the naive idea that a country could be united simply by propositions and shared beliefs. Then, when asked what the "Anglo-Protestant" identity of "Heritage Americans" is, he proceeds to list a bunch of beliefs like free speech and individualism. Interestingly, one of Auron's most recent guests on his channel was Yoram Hazony (who still blacklists men like Peter Brimelow and Jared Taylor), and here Auron is dutifully following Hazony's NatCon Op message that the ethnic identity of White Americans is illegitimate and thinking of White people as a race is evil. No explanation why though, something about it being "vulgar" and not trad. Auron is the last step of gatekeeping to stop White people taking their own side. Thankfully, this message is so stupid that only dullards and shills like Auron can maintain it now that it has to compete in the public square with real nationalism.
3:41

Auron MacIntyre's views on race are totally incoherent. Auron MacIntyre is a conservative opposed to White identity politics. Because his audience is more radical, he has to use pilpul to spread his message that White identity politics is evil. Here, he tells Tucker that thinking of people by race is a modern "vulgarisation" - not true, actually the modern innovation is the distinction between ethnicity and race that Auron insists on. Auron claims the real identities of Americans should be the hundreds of smaller ethnicities of the immigrants that arrived there. The Amish and Orthodox Jews are apparently good examples of what communities in America should look like. But then later in his interview, he says to be an American is to adopt an Anglo-Protestant culture, and any groups can be absorbed into it. So Auron is at once decrying Sicilians and Swedes dropping their ethnic identity to enter a more generic White category, while also complaining that the system has stopped attempting to absorb new groups into the foundational identity. Of course this is all stupid. What ethnic identity is Auron? The idea that the European groups that make up White America would keep their European identities through centuries without any ethnogenesis is ridiculous. Auron also scoffs at the naive idea that a country could be united simply by propositions and shared beliefs. Then, when asked what the "Anglo-Protestant" identity of "Heritage Americans" is, he proceeds to list a bunch of beliefs like free speech and individualism. Interestingly, one of Auron's most recent guests on his channel was Yoram Hazony (who still blacklists men like Peter Brimelow and Jared Taylor), and here Auron is dutifully following Hazony's NatCon Op message that the ethnic identity of White Americans is illegitimate and thinking of White people as a race is evil. No explanation why though, something about it being "vulgar" and not trad. Auron is the last step of gatekeeping to stop White people taking their own side. Thankfully, this message is so stupid that only dullards and shills like Auron can maintain it now that it has to compete in the public square with real nationalism.

Keith Woods

558,609 görüntüleme • 11 ay önce

Pause and really let this sink in. The United Kingdom’s Home Secretary just went on live national television and declared that English people do not exist. She described “English” not as a nationality or people, but as some kind of feeling or identity that anyone, from anywhere in the world, can simply adopt. This is not a slip of the tongue. This is the active erasure of an entire native people and their identity—on public record, in their own country. The British are being erased.
1:36

Pause and really let this sink in. The United Kingdom’s Home Secretary just went on live national television and declared that English people do not exist. She described “English” not as a nationality or people, but as some kind of feeling or identity that anyone, from anywhere in the world, can simply adopt. This is not a slip of the tongue. This is the active erasure of an entire native people and their identity—on public record, in their own country. The British are being erased.

Ian Miles Cheong

199,337 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

If your flag becomes a symbol of resistance in your own country, then you are being occupied. Self-hating white woman, Emily Spurrell, soon-to-be-ex-chairwoman of the Association of Police and Crime Commissioners, has said Operation: Raise the Colours is "used to provoke fear or assert dominance", and that it "is not free expression – that is intimidation." Yes, the English should be dominant in their own country. Yes, the English flag is the exclusive property of the English people, and their identity divides them from others. No, we should not deny our history and heritage to accommodate uninvited newcomers who hate us.
7:43

If your flag becomes a symbol of resistance in your own country, then you are being occupied. Self-hating white woman, Emily Spurrell, soon-to-be-ex-chairwoman of the Association of Police and Crime Commissioners, has said Operation: Raise the Colours is "used to provoke fear or assert dominance", and that it "is not free expression – that is intimidation." Yes, the English should be dominant in their own country. Yes, the English flag is the exclusive property of the English people, and their identity divides them from others. No, we should not deny our history and heritage to accommodate uninvited newcomers who hate us.

Connor Tomlinson

44,406 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce

Yesterday, I was overwhelmed by the support I received for my speech in Parliament. Many of you shared it widely, I had not posted it myself. I am now sharing the full speech again so those who missed it can watch how this government is excluding and targeting some of the most marginalised sections of our society. The fight will continue. We will not allow the rights of the LGBTQIA+ community and transgender persons to be diluted, and we will ensure that their dignity, identity, and constitutional protections remain intact. This Bill is a double assault on the transgender community’s dignity and rights: • While every MP in Parliament self declares their gender without scrutiny, transgender citizens are being forced to prove their identity before a medical board and the District Magistrate • From childhood, we are boxed into blue for boys and pink for girls, but identity is deeply personal and constitutionally protected • At a time when the LGBTQIA+ community is still fighting for recognition of same sex marriage, this government is taking us backwards by removing even the right to self identification • No meaningful consultation with the transgender community or stakeholders, despite Supreme Court led processes • The Bill invades privacy, enables discrimination, and opens the door to criminalisation This is not reform, this is regression. Not protection, but policing of identity. As Mahatma Gandhi reminded us, “The true measure of any society can be found in how it treats its most vulnerable members.”
23:09

Yesterday, I was overwhelmed by the support I received for my speech in Parliament. Many of you shared it widely, I had not posted it myself. I am now sharing the full speech again so those who missed it can watch how this government is excluding and targeting some of the most marginalised sections of our society. The fight will continue. We will not allow the rights of the LGBTQIA+ community and transgender persons to be diluted, and we will ensure that their dignity, identity, and constitutional protections remain intact. This Bill is a double assault on the transgender community’s dignity and rights: • While every MP in Parliament self declares their gender without scrutiny, transgender citizens are being forced to prove their identity before a medical board and the District Magistrate • From childhood, we are boxed into blue for boys and pink for girls, but identity is deeply personal and constitutionally protected • At a time when the LGBTQIA+ community is still fighting for recognition of same sex marriage, this government is taking us backwards by removing even the right to self identification • No meaningful consultation with the transgender community or stakeholders, despite Supreme Court led processes • The Bill invades privacy, enables discrimination, and opens the door to criminalisation This is not reform, this is regression. Not protection, but policing of identity. As Mahatma Gandhi reminded us, “The true measure of any society can be found in how it treats its most vulnerable members.”

Renuka Chowdhury

56,171 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

.David Sacks: "You're gonna see in the wake of this is that a lot of Jewish people are realizing that they don't have a home on the left anymore. And I expect that many Jews are going to start shifting right into the Republican Party, to a place where I've been for a while.... But I think what's happened over the last few decades is that the civil rights movement, in particular, and the left have moved to this woke ideology where it's no longer about colorblindness. It's more about identity groups. And instead of trying to get past racial differences, it's been about accentuating them. And so we've had this whole equity agenda, which is really defined as redistribution from one racial group to another racial group. I think that, for whatever reason, a lot of Jews just hadn't confronted the reality that the left had really changed in this way. I think it goes back to the fact that they thought if we're going to be defining identity groups in this woke way, Jews obviously should be one of these victim groups, but they're waking up to the fact that Jews are not. Jews are in the minds of this woke ideology, just white people with a Jewish background. As a result, they're part of an oppressor class. And I think that a lot of Jewish people who are waking up to this are realizing this is actually a very destructive ideology, and it makes us the bad guys. So I would expect that, again, a lot of Jewish people are waking up to how the left has changed... and I would expect there to be kind of a pilgrimage now of more Jews in America towards the right, as opposed to remaining on the left where they've always been." Via The All-In Podcast:
3:45

.David Sacks: "You're gonna see in the wake of this is that a lot of Jewish people are realizing that they don't have a home on the left anymore. And I expect that many Jews are going to start shifting right into the Republican Party, to a place where I've been for a while.... But I think what's happened over the last few decades is that the civil rights movement, in particular, and the left have moved to this woke ideology where it's no longer about colorblindness. It's more about identity groups. And instead of trying to get past racial differences, it's been about accentuating them. And so we've had this whole equity agenda, which is really defined as redistribution from one racial group to another racial group. I think that, for whatever reason, a lot of Jews just hadn't confronted the reality that the left had really changed in this way. I think it goes back to the fact that they thought if we're going to be defining identity groups in this woke way, Jews obviously should be one of these victim groups, but they're waking up to the fact that Jews are not. Jews are in the minds of this woke ideology, just white people with a Jewish background. As a result, they're part of an oppressor class. And I think that a lot of Jewish people who are waking up to this are realizing this is actually a very destructive ideology, and it makes us the bad guys. So I would expect that, again, a lot of Jewish people are waking up to how the left has changed... and I would expect there to be kind of a pilgrimage now of more Jews in America towards the right, as opposed to remaining on the left where they've always been." Via The All-In Podcast:

KanekoaTheGreat

542,958 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

Zimbabwe? No, this is London, England. The indigenous White British population, historically the overwhelming majority, has fallen to just 36.8% of the population there and they are now a minority in their own capital. London is no longer an English city.
0:23

Zimbabwe? No, this is London, England. The indigenous White British population, historically the overwhelming majority, has fallen to just 36.8% of the population there and they are now a minority in their own capital. London is no longer an English city.

Britain First

992,505 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

"I am English" 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Who are the English? This has recently been reported by the BBC as a ' deeply contentious debate', as if there is nowhere the people of England can tie themselves to, that we have no land of our own, or that we are not a race or indigenous people. Who are the English? The English are the native ethnic group of England and the largest ethnic group in the United Kingdom. We share a common history, language (English), culture, and identity, developed over 1000s of years. The English are a fusion of Celts, Britons, Anglo-Saxons, with some Romano and Norse influence. Modern genetic studies show the English as a mix: Anglo-Saxon/continental northern European (Angles & Saxons) who dominate the East, Central and Northern regions of England, and the indigenous Briton/Celtic populations (pre-Anglo-Saxon) who dominate the South and West of England. The name England means, 'Land of the Angles'. What is in a name? The etymology of my surname 'Denslow' originates from the words, 'Denu' meaning the valleys of South West England, and 'Sloh' meaning marsh, swamp or bog, so my surname translates to, man from the marshes of the valleys of South West England, and is over 1500 years old. I am literally a swamp creature. Are you English, what does your surname mean and which part of England does it originate from? Please let me know in the comments, I would love to hear from you. "I am English" The World Is Ours, not theirs.
7:00

"I am English" 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Who are the English? This has recently been reported by the BBC as a ' deeply contentious debate', as if there is nowhere the people of England can tie themselves to, that we have no land of our own, or that we are not a race or indigenous people. Who are the English? The English are the native ethnic group of England and the largest ethnic group in the United Kingdom. We share a common history, language (English), culture, and identity, developed over 1000s of years. The English are a fusion of Celts, Britons, Anglo-Saxons, with some Romano and Norse influence. Modern genetic studies show the English as a mix: Anglo-Saxon/continental northern European (Angles & Saxons) who dominate the East, Central and Northern regions of England, and the indigenous Briton/Celtic populations (pre-Anglo-Saxon) who dominate the South and West of England. The name England means, 'Land of the Angles'. What is in a name? The etymology of my surname 'Denslow' originates from the words, 'Denu' meaning the valleys of South West England, and 'Sloh' meaning marsh, swamp or bog, so my surname translates to, man from the marshes of the valleys of South West England, and is over 1500 years old. I am literally a swamp creature. Are you English, what does your surname mean and which part of England does it originate from? Please let me know in the comments, I would love to hear from you. "I am English" The World Is Ours, not theirs.

Darren of Plymouth

19,107 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

"When [British] people see small boat arrivals at their current scale, or they experience the pace and scale of migration today... their patriotism turns into something smaller, something darker. An ethnonationalism, emerges. The idea of a Greater Britan gives was to a Littler England..." Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood justifies Labour's performative migration controls today by saying that if the government aren't perceived as tough on migration "the hard right" will rise to power. Who does Mahmood define as "hard right ethnonationalists?" Anyone unwilling to say that she, a Pakistani Muslim woman, is English. She says Reform UK are an ethnonationalist party, but Nigel Farage says being English is "about how you feel, and what your priorities are." This is absurd. Mahmood is building a bogeyman to keep the political conversation confined to the limits of liberal Blairism. She admits it is motivated reasoning: “We are fighting for the very existence of a humane asylum and migration system in this country.” It isn't "ethnonationalism" to say that she isn't English, to respect the wishes of the electorate by not admitting any more fake refugees via any routes, and to encourage millions of people to return to their home countries.
1:58

"When [British] people see small boat arrivals at their current scale, or they experience the pace and scale of migration today... their patriotism turns into something smaller, something darker. An ethnonationalism, emerges. The idea of a Greater Britan gives was to a Littler England..." Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood justifies Labour's performative migration controls today by saying that if the government aren't perceived as tough on migration "the hard right" will rise to power. Who does Mahmood define as "hard right ethnonationalists?" Anyone unwilling to say that she, a Pakistani Muslim woman, is English. She says Reform UK are an ethnonationalist party, but Nigel Farage says being English is "about how you feel, and what your priorities are." This is absurd. Mahmood is building a bogeyman to keep the political conversation confined to the limits of liberal Blairism. She admits it is motivated reasoning: “We are fighting for the very existence of a humane asylum and migration system in this country.” It isn't "ethnonationalism" to say that she isn't English, to respect the wishes of the electorate by not admitting any more fake refugees via any routes, and to encourage millions of people to return to their home countries.

Connor Tomlinson

81,898 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

#WATCH | Delhi: On the Supreme Court directing that the Aadhaar card must be treated as the 12th document for the purpose of identity, Congress leader Shama Mohamed says, "The Supreme Court has said the right thing because the job of the Election Commission is to prove the identity... It is not their job to prove citizenship... We have already been saying that the Aadhaar card is important... And the judiciary has given a good judgment in this..."
0:46

#WATCH | Delhi: On the Supreme Court directing that the Aadhaar card must be treated as the 12th document for the purpose of identity, Congress leader Shama Mohamed says, "The Supreme Court has said the right thing because the job of the Election Commission is to prove the identity... It is not their job to prove citizenship... We have already been saying that the Aadhaar card is important... And the judiciary has given a good judgment in this..."

ANI

10,506 görüntüleme • 10 ay önce

White people NOT doing identity politics has led us to the deeply compromised position in which we find ourselves right now: Openly hated. Institutionally targeted. Legally unprotected. Our children an ever-dwindling minority in their own homeland. White people will not SURVIVE if we continue rejecting identity politics. The only state in which there's no racial identity politics is a homogenous one. We inherited such a state from the Founding Fathers, who built it 'for ourselves and our posterity.' That state was taken from us in 1965. If you want to stop racial identity politics, undo 'Diversity™.' If you're preaching against White people engaging in identity politics in this hellish 'Multicultural™' pyramid that we sit at the bottom of, then all you're doing is trying to disarm us in the middle of a fight for our lives. Tucker Carlson has made it clear that one of his top priorities is preventing the rise of White identity politics. Hardly an episode or appearance goes by without him harping on this repetitiously. On this most crucial issue, he's indistinguishable from Jonathan Greenblatt. The good news is that he will fail. We're not reverting to the MLK quotes that got us here. The Founders prescribed universal principles for a particular set of people - not for all the world's wretched refuse, who they knew and acknowledged were incapable of adhering to such. The jig is up. The 1960s are over. We will not be gatekept from taking our own side in the war that's being waged against us.
0:52

White people NOT doing identity politics has led us to the deeply compromised position in which we find ourselves right now: Openly hated. Institutionally targeted. Legally unprotected. Our children an ever-dwindling minority in their own homeland. White people will not SURVIVE if we continue rejecting identity politics. The only state in which there's no racial identity politics is a homogenous one. We inherited such a state from the Founding Fathers, who built it 'for ourselves and our posterity.' That state was taken from us in 1965. If you want to stop racial identity politics, undo 'Diversity™.' If you're preaching against White people engaging in identity politics in this hellish 'Multicultural™' pyramid that we sit at the bottom of, then all you're doing is trying to disarm us in the middle of a fight for our lives. Tucker Carlson has made it clear that one of his top priorities is preventing the rise of White identity politics. Hardly an episode or appearance goes by without him harping on this repetitiously. On this most crucial issue, he's indistinguishable from Jonathan Greenblatt. The good news is that he will fail. We're not reverting to the MLK quotes that got us here. The Founders prescribed universal principles for a particular set of people - not for all the world's wretched refuse, who they knew and acknowledged were incapable of adhering to such. The jig is up. The 1960s are over. We will not be gatekept from taking our own side in the war that's being waged against us.

Daniel Concannon

40,512 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

Robert Tombs denies the fact that being English is a matter of ancestry. He thinks it's about self-ID. Tombs says Muslim immigrants can "learn to be English" by singing the national anthem and reading Kipling poems. Tombs has the same view of national identity as a trans activist does of womanhood. Sack him. The hour is too late for these liberal delusions. You cannot celebrate England if you deny its distinct people exist.
0:39

Robert Tombs denies the fact that being English is a matter of ancestry. He thinks it's about self-ID. Tombs says Muslim immigrants can "learn to be English" by singing the national anthem and reading Kipling poems. Tombs has the same view of national identity as a trans activist does of womanhood. Sack him. The hour is too late for these liberal delusions. You cannot celebrate England if you deny its distinct people exist.

Connor Tomlinson

11,011 görüntüleme • 3 ay önce

As a response to "Kill the Boer", Afrikaaners of South Africa created their own society. Orania is an Afrikaaner only town with their own currency, government, energy source - and no other ethnic group can move there. They are entirely self reliant. This is a direct consequence of anti-white discrimination by the majority black population, and the knowledge that nobody will save them but themselves. Orania has virtually no crime and might be the safest place in the entire country. Had South Africa had healthy race relations, Orania wouldn't be necessary.
5:30

As a response to "Kill the Boer", Afrikaaners of South Africa created their own society. Orania is an Afrikaaner only town with their own currency, government, energy source - and no other ethnic group can move there. They are entirely self reliant. This is a direct consequence of anti-white discrimination by the majority black population, and the knowledge that nobody will save them but themselves. Orania has virtually no crime and might be the safest place in the entire country. Had South Africa had healthy race relations, Orania wouldn't be necessary.

𝐍𝐢𝐨𝐡 𝐁𝐞𝐫𝐠 🇮🇷 ✡︎

171,857 görüntüleme • 7 ay önce

.BJP’s contempt for Bengal is no secret, they despise our language, our culture, and our identity, yet their hunger to capture this state refuses to die down. But against the resolve of Smt. Mamata Banerjee, their entire hate project collapses. And here is the truth they refuse to hear: The BJP is not just losing Bengal. They are on track to lose Gujarat as well. Their own model state is slipping away, their authority is cracking, and their arrogance has pushed them into political freefall. No matter how loudly the BJP dreams, Bengal is beyond their reach and soon, the country will be too.
0:54

.BJP’s contempt for Bengal is no secret, they despise our language, our culture, and our identity, yet their hunger to capture this state refuses to die down. But against the resolve of Smt. Mamata Banerjee, their entire hate project collapses. And here is the truth they refuse to hear: The BJP is not just losing Bengal. They are on track to lose Gujarat as well. Their own model state is slipping away, their authority is cracking, and their arrogance has pushed them into political freefall. No matter how loudly the BJP dreams, Bengal is beyond their reach and soon, the country will be too.

All India Trinamool Congress

12,654 görüntüleme • 8 ay önce