正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

The best engineers aren't just coders. They're curious explorers who: • Question everything • See interconnections • Make complex things simple Your interview process should identify these traits.

54,085 次观看 • 1 年前 •via X (Twitter)

22 条评论

Kevin Henrikson 的头像
Kevin Henrikson1 年前

Technical skills are table stakes. What's far more important is how someone thinks and approaches problems. After interviewing hundreds of engineers and building teams that sold for $200M, I've developed an unusual way to spot top performers:

Kevin Henrikson 的头像
Kevin Henrikson1 年前

I ask them to describe their home internet setup. This single question tells me more about a candidate than hours of technical interviews. Here's why this works so well:

Kevin Henrikson 的头像
Kevin Henrikson1 年前

True engineers are obsessed with optimization. They can tell you: • Their router model • Network configuration • Backup systems • Troubleshooting protocols If they respond with "I don't know, it just works" - that's a red flag. But here's what's fascinating:

Kevin Henrikson 的头像
Kevin Henrikson1 年前

The best engineers treat their home network like it's mission-critical infrastructure. "If the Internet dies at my house, I'm going ninja-level to figure this shit out. The Internet is like breathing." This reveals the first key trait I look for: Deep curiosity about things.

Kevin Henrikson 的头像
Kevin Henrikson1 年前

The second trait: Systems thinking. I ask candidates to explain how email works. Not looking for textbook answers. I want to see how deep they can go: • DNS lookups • MX records • Spam filtering • Multi-tier architecture The patterns are revealing:

Kevin Henrikson 的头像
Kevin Henrikson1 年前

Average candidates give surface-level explanations. Great candidates dive into rabbit holes, exploring edge cases and interconnections. They can't help themselves - they're fascinated by complex systems. But there's one more critical trait:

Kevin Henrikson 的头像
Kevin Henrikson1 年前

The ability to simplify complexity. At Acompli (acquired by Microsoft), I interviewed 100 iOS engineers to hire ONE. The key screening question: "How would you build an app where very longs lists scroll at 60 frames per second?" Here's what happened:

Kevin Henrikson 的头像
Kevin Henrikson1 年前

99% jumped straight into technical solutions. The 1% we hired? They started by asking questions about user experience and performance tradeoffs. They understood that technical excellence serves a greater purpose.

Kevin Henrikson 的头像
Kevin Henrikson1 年前

These 3 traits combined: • Deep curiosity • Systems thinking • Simplifying complexity Are worth more than any coding test or algorithm puzzle. But here's the counterintuitive part:

Kevin Henrikson 的头像
Kevin Henrikson1 年前

You can't teach these traits. They're deeply ingrained patterns of thinking that develop over years. That's why I'd rather hire someone who compiled their own router firmware as a hobby than someone who aced every CS course.

Kevin Henrikson 的头像
Kevin Henrikson1 年前

This approach helped me build teams that: • Scaled to hundreds of engineers • Shipped products used by millions • Led to multiple $100M+ exits But most companies still rely on outdated interview methods.

Kevin Henrikson 的头像
Kevin Henrikson1 年前

The hard truth: Technical skills can be taught. But curiosity, systems thinking, and the ability to simplify complexity? Those are the real predictors of success.

Kevin Henrikson 的头像
Kevin Henrikson1 年前

Want to master the founder mindset and build better? Join Founder Mode for free weekly insights on startups, systems, and personal growth:

Kevin Henrikson 的头像
Kevin Henrikson1 年前

I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @KevinHenrikson for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:

Kevin Henrikson 的头像
Kevin Henrikson1 年前

Video credits: • YT link • YT link • YT link • YT link • YT link • YT link

Brandon Chapman 的头像
Brandon Chapman1 年前

It’s a two way street. I was always interviewing the interviewer. The best engineers don’t work for the monies and won’t accept jumping into teams that have incompetent members. Glad I’m still solo and building things for the love of it. Technical interviews? Who tf knows what they’re after. I’m not in their minds. They all have different ideas for what’s a sane or good response and what’s insane or bad. They’re basically just telling me repeatedly that I’m wasting my time and should be opening my own business. Here’s to round 4 of that.

Tom Löwe 的头像
Tom Löwe1 年前

When Keller talks, I always listen.

Anil Kumar 的头像
Anil Kumar1 年前

this was epic

Henning Sittler 的头像
Henning Sittler1 年前

“think simple enough” - Jim Keller

Quest Global 的头像
Quest Global2 年前

We embrace the exponentially curious mind, thinkers who see engineering and logic in everything, people that dream and do. Come and join our team of engineers.

∯🔔 的头像
∯🔔1 年前

@threadreaderapp unroll here

Thread Reader App 的头像
Thread Reader App1 年前

@KevinHenrikson @Thrasymachus5 Halo! you can read it here: See you soon. 🤖

相关视频