Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

The Broncos have a very specific scheme they like to use on heavy run downs. Against LA, they used it in the 2nd Half to shut down the Rams' 13 pers. run game. When facing the 49ers' 22 pers., the scheme was used again to stifle their run game....

35,919 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen •via X (Twitter)

8 Kommentare

Profilbild von Dean Hawkins
Dean Hawkinsvor 8 Tagen

With the TON Stunt, just curious, if it were a passing down would the timing be different for the N/DT?

Profilbild von Cody Alexander
Cody Alexandervor 8 Tagen

No, he's the trailer to the LB.

Profilbild von Lewis
Lewisvor 8 Tagen

@NickKendellMHH I want to learn defense

Profilbild von Mike Agnew
Mike Agnewvor 7 Tagen

Of course that little screen only worked because of a huge block in the back

Profilbild von Kodiak Broncos
Kodiak Broncosvor 8 Tagen

Super interesting. Does this help supplement lack of size on the DL

Profilbild von Cody Alexander
Cody Alexandervor 8 Tagen

No, you are trying to creat a funnel. Basically a kill box.

Profilbild von NC Bronco
NC Broncovor 8 Tagen

Who missed the assignment to stay with TE?

Profilbild von Cody Alexander
Cody Alexandervor 8 Tagen

Jones was there, but missed the tackle. It was a great call... Split-back, motioned #9 (TE) out of the backfield to create a bunch. That pushed Hufanga out of the box. --

Ähnliche Videos

I wanted to get some straight answers about the government’s 5% deposit scheme, because to me, it looks like risky lending at the taxpayers' expense. APRA have previously said that loans with a 95% value ratio are high-risk. I asked how they reconcile that with a government scheme that encourages this exact behaviour. They admitted that high-ratio lending is "more risky" and they are watching it closely. I’m worried about what happens if property prices drop by 10 or 20%. If people fall into negative equity, the taxpayer is underwriting a huge chunk of those losses. APRA ducked out of giving a specific answer on the scheme itself, however insisted their "stress tests" for the overall banking system are even more severe than the scenarios raised. I asked if the Treasurer warned about the scheme’s risks? They told me they gave some advice to Treasury early on about mortgage insurers, but nothing specifically to the Treasurer. They will provide me with a copy of that advice on notice. I questioned APRA as to whether this scheme follows their own sound risk management standards. They replied that they don’t "opine" on government policy, however confirmed that they’ll expect banks to hold the same amount of capital against these loans as any other high-risk product. Finally, I asked if they would publish stress test results specifically for this 5% scheme. They stated that their stress tests are "much broader than any one government policy" and that they are "not aware of a stress test" planned for this specific scheme. APRA knows these loans are risky and are tiptoeing around the topic.

Malcolm Roberts 🇦🇺

22,362 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten