正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

🇮🇷🇺🇸 The ceasefire is so battered its main use now is measuring who's breaking it... Karen Kwiatkowski didn't dress it up. She backed this deal at the start, and today she describes it as little more than a document you hold up against American conduct and count the violations....

267,728 次观看 • 22 天前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

Here’s my analysis of why MEGHAN MARKLE LIES with such ease and how the Oprah interview exposed it. There are lies that come from panic. There are lies that come from confusion. Then there are lies that come from entitlement. The kind that slip out smoothly, confidently, without a flicker of worry, because the person saying them believes consequences are for other people. That is exactly what Meghan Markle displayed in the Oprah interview when she claimed she and Harry were married “three days before” their wedding, with the Archbishop of Canterbury. She didn’t frame it as a private vow or a romantic moment. She framed it as an actual marriage. And she did it on global television with a smile, like she was sharing a charming secret. But it wasn’t charming. It wasn’t harmless. And it certainly wasn’t true. It was a lie told with ease because she expected everyone else to absorb it without questioning it. The Lie Was Designed to Sound Like a Fairytale, Not a Fact This is how Meghan operates. She doesn’t just lie, she packages the lie. She wraps it in sentiment and sweetness so the audience reacts emotionally instead of logically. She didn’t say “We exchanged vows privately.” That would be plausible, normal, and not legally loaded. She said “We got married.” That choice of words matters. It changes everything. It turns a private moment into a legal and religious claim. It drags an institution into her story. And it creates pressure on other people to defend themselves. That is the real point. Meghan’s lies are never just personal. They are strategic. This Was Not a “Little Mistake” Because It Had Real Consequences Anyone trying to defend her will call it a misunderstanding. But a misunderstanding does not involve naming the Archbishop of Canterbury and implying a secret marriage happened before a globally televised wedding. Her statement instantly created two outcomes. 1) It cornered the Archbishop into cleaning up her mess By claiming he “married” them days earlier, Meghan effectively placed him in a position where silence would look like confirmation and denial would look like embarrassment. So he had to respond. That is the cruelty in it. It’s not just that she lied. It’s that she lied in a way that forced a senior religious figure to publicly correct her. She put a man of office into the role of damage control, because she wanted a romantic headline. That is not a “slip.” That is reckless and selfish. 2) It undermined the legitimacy of the official wedding Their actual wedding was not private. It was not hidden. It was a historical public event. So why tell the world the “real” marriage happened earlier? Because it reframes the real wedding into something performative, staged, and secondary. It whispers to the audience: That wasn’t for us, that was for them. It’s the same pattern every time. If the institution celebrates her, she uses it. If the institution limits her, she devalues it. Why She Lies With Ease: Because Her Lies Are Tools, Not Errors Meghan does not lie like someone afraid of being caught. She lies like someone who believes truth is flexible.

Queen Esther

110,252 次观看 • 6 个月前

⚡️⭕️ Benjamin Netanyahu announces his achievements over the Lebanese state: "Citizens of Israel, before the Sabbath I want to announce to you a major achievement for the State of Israel. You know that we are conducting negotiations in Washington between Israeli, Lebanese, and American representatives. A lengthy negotiation, and today it has borne fruit. The most important thing is that first and foremost, Israel remains in the security zone in southern Lebanon. This is a major achievement, and we will maintain it as long as Hezbollah is not disarmed, as long as there is a threat to the State of Israel. This is also a significant blow to Iran. Iran is trying to force us to withdraw by force from southern Lebanon. And in effect, Israel, Lebanon, and the United States are telling them - this is none of your business. You have no role in Lebanon. Neither you nor Hezbollah nor any terrorist organization. The additional thing is, of course, that we are allowing the Lebanese army to begin organizing to take control of the area. We are creating two pilot zones. Both are at the recommendation of the IDF. One is entirely outside the security zone, south of the Litani, and the second is north of the Litani, a small part of which is in the expanded security zone that we achieved over the past two weeks, and which the IDF does not need - it says so in the clearest way. We are always preserving the original security zone outside the range of artillery fire. We do not allow Hezbollah to enter there, nor do we allow civilians to enter. This is preserved. And the most important thing is that Israel says: our security comes first."

Middle East Observer

29,576 次观看 • 27 天前