Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

The Census should only count citizens. Including noncitizens alters the political representation of the states in the House of Representatives and devalues the votes of citizens. It’s already affected apportionment in the House and the Electoral College. Hans von Spakovsky

11,181 просмотров • 1 год назад •via X (Twitter)

Комментарии: 10

Фото профиля Heritage Foundation
Heritage Foundation1 год назад

Aliens have no right to participate in governing this country, so they shouldn’t be counted for apportionment. More from @HvonSpakovsky here 👇

Фото профиля 🇺🇸✨Brett Kruschke ✞
🇺🇸✨Brett Kruschke ✞1 год назад

@HvonSpakovsky 💯 It is completely insane that non-citizens would be counted! It creates a perverse incentive that @TheDemocrats have pursued with a bloodlust. It must end.

Фото профиля J
J1 год назад

@HvonSpakovsky Can we count our sister city (Tokyo 37.4 million population) in our census numbers? I think that would only be fair since non citizens are being counted.

Фото профиля Devin C.
Devin C.1 год назад

@HvonSpakovsky Not surprising given the bad actors in our government.

Фото профиля Petrit Selimi
Petrit Selimi1 год назад

@HvonSpakovsky I think you need to both know what’s the entire population for very important economic considerations and analysis but also the number of actual citizens, which can be used for political considerations like apportionment.

Фото профиля Econymous
Econymous1 год назад

@HvonSpakovsky Good luck with that.

Фото профиля Arleigh Frisco
Arleigh Frisco1 год назад

@HvonSpakovsky Common sense: only citizens can vote and participate in the political system should influence political representation.

Фото профиля Karen Arnold
Karen Arnold1 год назад

@HvonSpakovsky I'm okay with counting them, but identifying them so they can be excluded from apportionment.

Фото профиля Project_Manager
Project_Manager1 год назад

@HvonSpakovsky Fair point—counting only citizens would keep representation tied to actual voters. @CharlesMooreX1 has mentioned how this could shift power in Congress and the Electoral College. It’s a legit debate about fairness in voting weight.

Фото профиля P James Jenkins
P James Jenkins1 год назад

@HvonSpakovsky YES YES a 1000 times yes!!!!

Похожие видео

🚨 Chairman Comer (Rep. James Comer) Opens Hearing on Oversight of the U.S. Census Bureau “The Census Bureau’s Post-Enumeration Survey—which measures Census count accuracy—revealed significant errors in 14 states. These errors predominantly benefited Democratic-leaning states in the allocation of congressional seats and electoral college votes. “In contrast to the 2020 census, no states were found to have had such errors in the 2010 census. “In 2020, the Post-Enumeration Survey suggests that there were overcounts in New York, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Hawaii, Delaware, Minnesota, Utah, and Ohio. And there were undercounts in Texas, Florida, Mississippi, Arkansas, Tennessee, and Illinois. “Six of the eight states benefiting from overcounts tended to favor Democrats in awarding congressional apportionment and electoral college votes. “Meanwhile, five of the six states that were unfairly penalized by undercounts tended to vote for Republicans. “These miscounts had an impact on representation. “Small numbers of proportional differences in population between states can impact the apportionment calculation. “In the 2020 apportionment, a difference of only 89 people was the tipping point for New York being apportioned 26 seats instead of 27. “Just 89 people. “Based on the 2020 Post-Enumeration Survey, it is likely that miscounts caused Colorado to gain a seat it would not have gained otherwise, and for Rhode Island and Minnesota to each keep a seat they would have lost. Meanwhile, Texas and Florida likely should have each gained a seat. “It is imperative that we understand what went wrong in the 2020 census and take action to mitigate the risk of those similar errors in the 2030 census.”

Oversight Committee

148,945 просмотров • 1 год назад