Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

🇺🇸 The Charlie Kirk case just got its deepest forensic breakdown yet, from the DNA on the rifle to the missing ambulance to the altered crime scene Forensic scientist Joseph Scott Morgan started with the soil. Roughly ten inches were dug out of the shooting scene days after it...

MarioNawfal's profile picture

Mario Nawfal

3,779,272 subscribers

244,049 просмотров • 1 месяц назад •via X (Twitter)

Наука и технологииОбразованиеНовости и политика
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

This umpire gave this kid and his team two warnings for throwing the bat at the catcher. He told them if it happened again they were going to get ejected from the game. Well….it happened again. The batter hit the ball back to the pitcher and the pitcher overthrew first base. But, the umpire called a dead ball and called the batter out and ejected him from the game. The coach came out to argue and said the batter didn’t throw the bat, that it was a regular follow through on the back swing. He told the umpire they had it on film. The umpire said he had it on film too. Then the third base coach came down to argue and the umpire told the coach he was wrong and that he had it on video. You can hear the parents screaming at him. Some people said that was a terrible call and he let go legally on the follow through. You can also hear them tell the umpire that he had it out for that kid. 🤯 But a lot of people sided with the ump and said he handled it well and with that many warnings that it was a fantastic call. 💯 The umpire gave the same kid two prior warnings. Even if it wasn’t intentional, there has to be consequences after a third time. He could seriously injure the catcher. This will help the batter in the future hopefully. What do you think? Was this the right or wrong call?
1:55

This umpire gave this kid and his team two warnings for throwing the bat at the catcher. He told them if it happened again they were going to get ejected from the game. Well….it happened again. The batter hit the ball back to the pitcher and the pitcher overthrew first base. But, the umpire called a dead ball and called the batter out and ejected him from the game. The coach came out to argue and said the batter didn’t throw the bat, that it was a regular follow through on the back swing. He told the umpire they had it on film. The umpire said he had it on film too. Then the third base coach came down to argue and the umpire told the coach he was wrong and that he had it on video. You can hear the parents screaming at him. Some people said that was a terrible call and he let go legally on the follow through. You can also hear them tell the umpire that he had it out for that kid. 🤯 But a lot of people sided with the ump and said he handled it well and with that many warnings that it was a fantastic call. 💯 The umpire gave the same kid two prior warnings. Even if it wasn’t intentional, there has to be consequences after a third time. He could seriously injure the catcher. This will help the batter in the future hopefully. What do you think? Was this the right or wrong call?

👉M-Û-R-Č-H👈

2,119,341 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Joe Rogan said Chris Rock getting slapped by Will Smith in the Oscars was like the best thing that ever happened to him. Adam Sandler: His live special was fuck! I loved it. I loved it. Joe Rogan: Yeah, and it was also like the build-up because of getting slapped by Will Smith and all that crazy shit. Yeah, yeah, yeah. I think that was like the best thing that ever happened to him, because then he became like wild again. Like, his stand-up was like outrageous. It was like the Rock of old. Adam Sandler: That night was like watching a fucking Super Bowl. You were just like, "What? it's a live event. Holy fuck, what the fuck?" And then he was a badass, and then I think he had some white shit on, and he looked cool as fuck. You were waiting for him to talk about it, and then he got to it and he got fucking excited to say it.
2:19

Joe Rogan said Chris Rock getting slapped by Will Smith in the Oscars was like the best thing that ever happened to him. Adam Sandler: His live special was fuck! I loved it. I loved it. Joe Rogan: Yeah, and it was also like the build-up because of getting slapped by Will Smith and all that crazy shit. Yeah, yeah, yeah. I think that was like the best thing that ever happened to him, because then he became like wild again. Like, his stand-up was like outrageous. It was like the Rock of old. Adam Sandler: That night was like watching a fucking Super Bowl. You were just like, "What? it's a live event. Holy fuck, what the fuck?" And then he was a badass, and then I think he had some white shit on, and he looked cool as fuck. You were waiting for him to talk about it, and then he got to it and he got fucking excited to say it.

Deborah

1,911,617 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Well there it is. We have Robinson on video scoping out the scene, then coming back in different clothing with the rifle stuffed down his pant leg, then revisiting the scene of the crime. On top of all the communications and verbal admittance, the evidence is pretty clear that Robinson was the shooter. This was always the case, and I even said so at the time that Robinson fled the scene with the rifle in his pant leg, which was visible on the door cams from the neighborhood he cut through to ditch the weapon in the forest. The facts have always pointed to Robinson being the shooter, and anyone claiming anything otherwise is not worth being listened to in any capacity whatsoever. It’s time for Candace Owens, and everyone else like her, to delete your accounts and never show your faces again.
1:35

Well there it is. We have Robinson on video scoping out the scene, then coming back in different clothing with the rifle stuffed down his pant leg, then revisiting the scene of the crime. On top of all the communications and verbal admittance, the evidence is pretty clear that Robinson was the shooter. This was always the case, and I even said so at the time that Robinson fled the scene with the rifle in his pant leg, which was visible on the door cams from the neighborhood he cut through to ditch the weapon in the forest. The facts have always pointed to Robinson being the shooter, and anyone claiming anything otherwise is not worth being listened to in any capacity whatsoever. It’s time for Candace Owens, and everyone else like her, to delete your accounts and never show your faces again.

Clandestine

132,294 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

The story of what happened to Henry Hill after the events of Goodfellas is arguably just as interesting as what took place in the film, albeit more tragic. Despite what a lot of people believe, Henry was only in the witness protection program for two years. Ed McDonald, the prosecutor who helped turn Hill into a cooperating witness - and who also played himself in Goodfellas - explained what happened to him afterwards. “I can’t tell you how many times a month I read that Henry Hill was in the program for seven years, Henry Hill was in the program for six years, Henry Hill was in the program for ten years. Henry goes into the program in June of 1980… In August of 1981, Henry was in his third city. So he had blown Omaha, he had blown the suburbs of Cincinnati and Kentucky, and he was now in Seattle. And I get a phone call from Washington and they said, ‘He’s blown it again. He’s done.’ I go down, I plead with them. They said, ‘Look, he’s out. He’s out as of September 1st. We will fund him through the end of the year so he can have the wherewithal to be testifying at the point-shaving case. But after that, he’s done.’ By the 1st of January, 1982, Henry was out of the witness protection program. This is when I come in, and I’m sort of like Henry’s guardian angel. I went to Steve Carbone of the FBI and I said, ‘He’s working on all these cases because he cooperated in many cases for us. The witness protection program and the Justice Department are not going to do it anymore. Can the Bureau come up with some money?’ So the Bureau came up with money to support him for about six months, and then the Bureau pulled the plug. I had a friend at the New York City Police Department, a detective who did homicide cases in organized crime matters. And we worked out a deal where we’d bring Henry in, and Henry would talk about organized crime murders. And for every murder that they could close, Henry would get paid some money. I don’t remember what it was. It was probably $500 or $1,000. And at one point, I said to Henry, ‘Who have you been identifying as being responsible for these organized crime murders?’ There were like 30 of them. He started telling me the names of the people, and the vast majority of the people he identified were dead. They were people who had been killed themselves… So the detectives were closing the cases, which means that they get credit for solving a murder. But they didn’t necessarily solve the murder - I think they were allowing wise guys who were responsible to go scot-free. So it was kind of crazy. But that sort of dried up by 1984, 1985. At that point, Henry had no support from the government any longer. And at the time, he was doing crazy stuff. He was getting arrested. Mostly, what he was getting arrested for was the result of alcoholism. He’d go out and go to a bar and get blind drunk, then go out and drive and get arrested for DWI. And then maybe he’d throw a punch at the cops. And one time I called the prosecutor in Kansas or someplace, and I said, ‘What happened?’ They said, ‘Well, he was arrested for breaking and entering.’ ‘They found him at a grocery store on the floor with a six-pack of beer. It was after the bars had closed. Henry wanted to keep drinking, so he broke into a grocery store and just went and got a six-pack.’ I guess some alarm went off that Henry didn’t hear, and they found him on the floor and arrested him for breaking and entering.” It was crazy, sort of minor-league stuff until, I guess, late '87… (1/2)
2:26

The story of what happened to Henry Hill after the events of Goodfellas is arguably just as interesting as what took place in the film, albeit more tragic. Despite what a lot of people believe, Henry was only in the witness protection program for two years. Ed McDonald, the prosecutor who helped turn Hill into a cooperating witness - and who also played himself in Goodfellas - explained what happened to him afterwards. “I can’t tell you how many times a month I read that Henry Hill was in the program for seven years, Henry Hill was in the program for six years, Henry Hill was in the program for ten years. Henry goes into the program in June of 1980… In August of 1981, Henry was in his third city. So he had blown Omaha, he had blown the suburbs of Cincinnati and Kentucky, and he was now in Seattle. And I get a phone call from Washington and they said, ‘He’s blown it again. He’s done.’ I go down, I plead with them. They said, ‘Look, he’s out. He’s out as of September 1st. We will fund him through the end of the year so he can have the wherewithal to be testifying at the point-shaving case. But after that, he’s done.’ By the 1st of January, 1982, Henry was out of the witness protection program. This is when I come in, and I’m sort of like Henry’s guardian angel. I went to Steve Carbone of the FBI and I said, ‘He’s working on all these cases because he cooperated in many cases for us. The witness protection program and the Justice Department are not going to do it anymore. Can the Bureau come up with some money?’ So the Bureau came up with money to support him for about six months, and then the Bureau pulled the plug. I had a friend at the New York City Police Department, a detective who did homicide cases in organized crime matters. And we worked out a deal where we’d bring Henry in, and Henry would talk about organized crime murders. And for every murder that they could close, Henry would get paid some money. I don’t remember what it was. It was probably $500 or $1,000. And at one point, I said to Henry, ‘Who have you been identifying as being responsible for these organized crime murders?’ There were like 30 of them. He started telling me the names of the people, and the vast majority of the people he identified were dead. They were people who had been killed themselves… So the detectives were closing the cases, which means that they get credit for solving a murder. But they didn’t necessarily solve the murder - I think they were allowing wise guys who were responsible to go scot-free. So it was kind of crazy. But that sort of dried up by 1984, 1985. At that point, Henry had no support from the government any longer. And at the time, he was doing crazy stuff. He was getting arrested. Mostly, what he was getting arrested for was the result of alcoholism. He’d go out and go to a bar and get blind drunk, then go out and drive and get arrested for DWI. And then maybe he’d throw a punch at the cops. And one time I called the prosecutor in Kansas or someplace, and I said, ‘What happened?’ They said, ‘Well, he was arrested for breaking and entering.’ ‘They found him at a grocery store on the floor with a six-pack of beer. It was after the bars had closed. Henry wanted to keep drinking, so he broke into a grocery store and just went and got a six-pack.’ I guess some alarm went off that Henry didn’t hear, and they found him on the floor and arrested him for breaking and entering.” It was crazy, sort of minor-league stuff until, I guess, late '87… (1/2)

Gangster Cinema Central

619,023 просмотров • 12 дней назад

🚨 THE FBI ADMITS SEARCHERS LITTERED THE NANCY GUTHRIE CRIME SCENE — AND NOW THEY WANT YOU TO TRUST THE DNA This isn’t a leak. This isn’t a rumor. It’s from the FBI’s own statement. Investigators collected SIXTEEN gloves near the Nancy Guthrie crime scene. Most of them were searchers’ gloves - pulled off and discarded across the area during the search. Read that again. The crime scene wasn’t preserved. It was CONTAMINATED. People walking through the area. Removing gloves. Throwing them into fields and along roadsides. Then, after all of that, the FBI says ONE glove, found two miles away, contains unknown male DNA and “appears to match” the subject seen in surveillance footage. That DNA is now being processed by Federal Bureau of Investigation and prepared for entry into CODIS. This is Kash Patel’s FBI. This is their evidence handling. This is their chain of custody. So let’s be very clear about what they’re asking you to accept: • A crime scene flooded with discarded gloves • Evidence handled after contamination • DNA processed days later • And total trust in the results If searchers were literally littering the crime scene… how does anyone know which DNA belongs to a suspect - and which belongs to the people trampling through the evidence? Is this gross incompetence... or the perfect built-in excuse when the evidence doesn’t line up?
1:38

🚨 THE FBI ADMITS SEARCHERS LITTERED THE NANCY GUTHRIE CRIME SCENE — AND NOW THEY WANT YOU TO TRUST THE DNA This isn’t a leak. This isn’t a rumor. It’s from the FBI’s own statement. Investigators collected SIXTEEN gloves near the Nancy Guthrie crime scene. Most of them were searchers’ gloves - pulled off and discarded across the area during the search. Read that again. The crime scene wasn’t preserved. It was CONTAMINATED. People walking through the area. Removing gloves. Throwing them into fields and along roadsides. Then, after all of that, the FBI says ONE glove, found two miles away, contains unknown male DNA and “appears to match” the subject seen in surveillance footage. That DNA is now being processed by Federal Bureau of Investigation and prepared for entry into CODIS. This is Kash Patel’s FBI. This is their evidence handling. This is their chain of custody. So let’s be very clear about what they’re asking you to accept: • A crime scene flooded with discarded gloves • Evidence handled after contamination • DNA processed days later • And total trust in the results If searchers were literally littering the crime scene… how does anyone know which DNA belongs to a suspect - and which belongs to the people trampling through the evidence? Is this gross incompetence... or the perfect built-in excuse when the evidence doesn’t line up?

HustleBitch

280,035 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

First he was told that he had to be put to sleep. Then it looked like he might never walk again but what nobody had counted on was the heart within little Stormzy. I remember the days trying to teach him to walk. He must have fallen over 1000 times but every time he got back up
0:59

First he was told that he had to be put to sleep. Then it looked like he might never walk again but what nobody had counted on was the heart within little Stormzy. I remember the days trying to teach him to walk. He must have fallen over 1000 times but every time he got back up

Niall Harbison

274,056 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад

🚨 WHY HAVEN’T YOU HEARD ABOUT THIS MAN YET? September 11th, the day after Charlie Kirk was assassinated, a man dressed in scrubs and doctor’s lab coat was arrested for breaking into the crime scene at UVU and filming evidence. He didn’t run to the Losee...no, instead he went directly to the Woodbury. Sound familiar? The very building where I caught someone on video on the roof 17 minutes before Charlie was shot and killed. This guys name? Russell Kennington, 38. Arrested for criminal trespass and obstruction of justice, felony level. He reportedly crossed inside two sets of yellow crime scene tape, claiming he was “reminiscing and filming the scene” and “following the shadows”. So why was a man disguised as a doctor, sneaking into the crime scene just hours after the shooting and why is NO ONE talking about it?
0:50

🚨 WHY HAVEN’T YOU HEARD ABOUT THIS MAN YET? September 11th, the day after Charlie Kirk was assassinated, a man dressed in scrubs and doctor’s lab coat was arrested for breaking into the crime scene at UVU and filming evidence. He didn’t run to the Losee...no, instead he went directly to the Woodbury. Sound familiar? The very building where I caught someone on video on the roof 17 minutes before Charlie was shot and killed. This guys name? Russell Kennington, 38. Arrested for criminal trespass and obstruction of justice, felony level. He reportedly crossed inside two sets of yellow crime scene tape, claiming he was “reminiscing and filming the scene” and “following the shadows”. So why was a man disguised as a doctor, sneaking into the crime scene just hours after the shooting and why is NO ONE talking about it?

HustleBitch

6,164,134 просмотров • 11 месяцев назад

Everyone calls Fredo the weak one. Watch that scene again. His father gets shot in the street and Fredo freezes. He fumbles his gun, drops it, ends up on the curb crying like a kid. For most people that settles it: he's useless, he's not built for this life. But that's the point. Fredo was never meant to be strong, or smart. He wasn't Sonny. He wasn't Michael. He was an ordinary man who happened to have the Godfather for a father. So when the shooting starts, he does what most of us would do. He panics. He breaks. The same softness that made him a bad gangster was the one thing the family had no room for. Michael runs the business better than any of them ever could. But the day he loses Fredo, he loses the last soft thing left in him. A family can't run on business alone. Fredo was the proof. Nobody saw it until he was gone
0:59

Everyone calls Fredo the weak one. Watch that scene again. His father gets shot in the street and Fredo freezes. He fumbles his gun, drops it, ends up on the curb crying like a kid. For most people that settles it: he's useless, he's not built for this life. But that's the point. Fredo was never meant to be strong, or smart. He wasn't Sonny. He wasn't Michael. He was an ordinary man who happened to have the Godfather for a father. So when the shooting starts, he does what most of us would do. He panics. He breaks. The same softness that made him a bad gangster was the one thing the family had no room for. Michael runs the business better than any of them ever could. But the day he loses Fredo, he loses the last soft thing left in him. A family can't run on business alone. Fredo was the proof. Nobody saw it until he was gone

best of mafia cinema

96,650 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

‼️BOMBSHELL: CNN Originally Reported That The Screwdriver Was FOUND "Near The Rifle" In The Woods — Then The Story Changed To The ROOF.🤔 On September 11, CNN claimed the investigators found the screwdriver in the woods with the gun. Evan Perez said the suspect dumped the rifle, there was a towel, and they also found a screwdriver. Pamela Brown said authorities recovered it “right near the rifle they found.” The Telegraph and New York Magazine repeated it: woodland, next to the bolt-action, used to take the stock off. Four days later Kash Patel put the same screwdriver on the Losee roof and tied DNA to it. That is the version that eventually stuck. That flip is the problem. Officer Bagley later testified he found a red-and-black screwdriver on that roof about 10 to 15 feet inside the guardrail. His body camera, according to the record iand his testimony, cuts out before he claims he found it. And in the Losee rooftop CCTV Cfootage Candace Owens released, the figure on that roof never pulls a screwdriver and never assembles a rifle on camera. You are asked to believe a tool jumped from the woods to the sniper pad, that the camera died at the exact moment it mattered, and that the assembly happened in a blind spot the public is not allowed to see. If the official story is airtight, release the uncut roof cam, the Bagley body-cam file, and the original evidence log that shows where that screwdriver was first tagged. Until then the September 11 CNN line and the September 15 roof line cannot both be true. From: jESSiLEE* FOLLOW Her!
0:54

‼️BOMBSHELL: CNN Originally Reported That The Screwdriver Was FOUND "Near The Rifle" In The Woods — Then The Story Changed To The ROOF.🤔 On September 11, CNN claimed the investigators found the screwdriver in the woods with the gun. Evan Perez said the suspect dumped the rifle, there was a towel, and they also found a screwdriver. Pamela Brown said authorities recovered it “right near the rifle they found.” The Telegraph and New York Magazine repeated it: woodland, next to the bolt-action, used to take the stock off. Four days later Kash Patel put the same screwdriver on the Losee roof and tied DNA to it. That is the version that eventually stuck. That flip is the problem. Officer Bagley later testified he found a red-and-black screwdriver on that roof about 10 to 15 feet inside the guardrail. His body camera, according to the record iand his testimony, cuts out before he claims he found it. And in the Losee rooftop CCTV Cfootage Candace Owens released, the figure on that roof never pulls a screwdriver and never assembles a rifle on camera. You are asked to believe a tool jumped from the woods to the sniper pad, that the camera died at the exact moment it mattered, and that the assembly happened in a blind spot the public is not allowed to see. If the official story is airtight, release the uncut roof cam, the Bagley body-cam file, and the original evidence log that shows where that screwdriver was first tagged. Until then the September 11 CNN line and the September 15 roof line cannot both be true. From: jESSiLEE* FOLLOW Her!

Project Constitution

108,563 просмотров • 14 дней назад

"That staff wasn't just part of the styling, it was what he was using to support himself 😭" "And then someone in the audience said, "Do you really have to keep holding that staff?" He heard it... and put it down, never picked it up again..."
1:55

"That staff wasn't just part of the styling, it was what he was using to support himself 😭" "And then someone in the audience said, "Do you really have to keep holding that staff?" He heard it... and put it down, never picked it up again..."

tianyu

23,467 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Former Miami Police Homicide Detective Pat Diaz breaks down the potential mishandling of the Nancy Guthrie crime scene—offering his insight as a homicide detective with 25 years of experience. “The first rule of homicide investigation is your crime scene…In this case there was no reason to release the crime scene so early. So what happens now—once you bring the FBI in—they’re gonna want to see the crime scene again. Well what happened then is [local authorities] released it and let everybody else go through it and so now you have to restore a crime scene.” Watch The Matt Gaetz Show on YouTube TV Today!
1:24

Former Miami Police Homicide Detective Pat Diaz breaks down the potential mishandling of the Nancy Guthrie crime scene—offering his insight as a homicide detective with 25 years of experience. “The first rule of homicide investigation is your crime scene…In this case there was no reason to release the crime scene so early. So what happens now—once you bring the FBI in—they’re gonna want to see the crime scene again. Well what happened then is [local authorities] released it and let everybody else go through it and so now you have to restore a crime scene.” Watch The Matt Gaetz Show on YouTube TV Today!

One America News

73,929 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

Wiz Khalifa says he rewrote his second verse for “See You Again” after Paul Walker's death, just one week before Furious 7 was released “It was right when he passed. He was filming for the movie, and they were like, ‘Something happened. We need to do a whole little redirection, and you're going to be a part of that” “So they're like, ‘This is the last scene of the movie. He's in the movie, but we're generating his face on a couple scenes. And this is going to be one of them where it's going to be him riding off into the sunset, but it's going to represent his departure’” “But by the time the movie had come out, it was like a week before the movie came out, they were like, ‘We need to finish the song, and we're going to shoot the video, and we just want you and Charlie Puth on there. Everybody else we don't want, so you need to write another verse.’ So I quickly came in there. I watched the scene, because I already did the first verse just based off what they told me it was going to be like. Then for the second verse, they were like watch the scene and write it based off that” “I watched the scene, wrote my verse real quick, recorded it, we shot the video the next week, and then it comes out with the movie. It's just supposed to be a soundtrack song, but as soon as it got on the radio, it went number one and stayed there for like 12 or 13 weeks. I never knew it was going to do all of that at all” “It's unfortunate that Paul Walker lost his life, and his legacy is always going to live on. I met his family and they loved it. But I think ‘See You Again’ connects because you can tell everybody goes through those losses, and you can feel that in those verses. I've taken losses, and I've personally felt what that feels like. So to be able to channel that through the music, tell his story, help his legacy live on, and also connect with other people who go through similar things, that was my main goal. That's what I knew I could do through my personal experiences, and I'm glad that the world”
2:32

Wiz Khalifa says he rewrote his second verse for “See You Again” after Paul Walker's death, just one week before Furious 7 was released “It was right when he passed. He was filming for the movie, and they were like, ‘Something happened. We need to do a whole little redirection, and you're going to be a part of that” “So they're like, ‘This is the last scene of the movie. He's in the movie, but we're generating his face on a couple scenes. And this is going to be one of them where it's going to be him riding off into the sunset, but it's going to represent his departure’” “But by the time the movie had come out, it was like a week before the movie came out, they were like, ‘We need to finish the song, and we're going to shoot the video, and we just want you and Charlie Puth on there. Everybody else we don't want, so you need to write another verse.’ So I quickly came in there. I watched the scene, because I already did the first verse just based off what they told me it was going to be like. Then for the second verse, they were like watch the scene and write it based off that” “I watched the scene, wrote my verse real quick, recorded it, we shot the video the next week, and then it comes out with the movie. It's just supposed to be a soundtrack song, but as soon as it got on the radio, it went number one and stayed there for like 12 or 13 weeks. I never knew it was going to do all of that at all” “It's unfortunate that Paul Walker lost his life, and his legacy is always going to live on. I met his family and they loved it. But I think ‘See You Again’ connects because you can tell everybody goes through those losses, and you can feel that in those verses. I've taken losses, and I've personally felt what that feels like. So to be able to channel that through the music, tell his story, help his legacy live on, and also connect with other people who go through similar things, that was my main goal. That's what I knew I could do through my personal experiences, and I'm glad that the world”

dank

39,598 просмотров • 1 месяц назад

Carlos Alcaraz says he initially wasn’t sure if he was cramping or if it was an issue with his adductor during his match against Zverev, ‘I just told what happened to the physio & he decided to take a medical’ “I didn’t think it was cramps at all at the beginning. I didn’t know exactly what it was. I ran to a forehand and started to feel it in the right adductor. That’s why I called the physio. Because it was just that moment, the rest of the legs.. the left leg was good. Not good but decent. After that with all the stress I didn’t know what was going on. I didn’t know if it was going to be worse or not. In that moment I just talked to the physio and said ‘Ok I just went to run to the forehand side and I started to feel the right adductor.’ He decided to take the medical time out and he did it. I just told what happened to the physio and he decided to take a medical.” (via Australian Open Press)
2:04

Carlos Alcaraz says he initially wasn’t sure if he was cramping or if it was an issue with his adductor during his match against Zverev, ‘I just told what happened to the physio & he decided to take a medical’ “I didn’t think it was cramps at all at the beginning. I didn’t know exactly what it was. I ran to a forehand and started to feel it in the right adductor. That’s why I called the physio. Because it was just that moment, the rest of the legs.. the left leg was good. Not good but decent. After that with all the stress I didn’t know what was going on. I didn’t know if it was going to be worse or not. In that moment I just talked to the physio and said ‘Ok I just went to run to the forehand side and I started to feel the right adductor.’ He decided to take the medical time out and he did it. I just told what happened to the physio and he decided to take a medical.” (via Australian Open Press)

The Tennis Letter

516,967 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

🚨BREAKING: Read the Official Court Filing in the Tyler Robinson Case—Just Released😳 The establishment is trying to bury the details of the newest court filing in the Tyler Robinson case, but the actual documents prove the entire official narrative is collapsing in real-time. The state does not have an open-and-shut case. They have a massive, compromised mess, and they are scrambling. Here is exactly what the defense's new motion reveals: The prosecution's entire timeline relies on the rifle found at the scene. But the filing officially confirms that the ATF’s firearm analysis on the bullet recovered during the autopsy was "inconclusive." They cannot forensically match the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk to the weapon they claim Tyler Robinson used. The defense is literally planning to use the state's own ATF ballistics report as exculpatory evidence to clear Tyler's name. They told the public this was a lone gunman. Yet, the FBI and ATF DNA reports indicate that multiple different DNA profiles (a DNA mixture) were found on the evidence, including the rifle. The crime scene was contaminated, the weapon was handled by multiple people, and the Feds are desperately trying to sort through the mess. How is the state responding to their lack of forensic evidence? By burying the defense. The filing reveals the prosecution just dumped 20,000 electronic audio files and written documents onto Tyler’s lawyers. It is a classic stall tactic. Because the Feds' testing is so convoluted and full of mixed DNA, the defense is demanding a 6-month delay so they can bring in independent forensic biologists, genetic systems engineers, and statisticians to verify if the FBI and ATF even applied correct scientific procedures. Tyler Robinson is a scapegoat, and the physical evidence proves it. 🇺🇸⚓️
3:39

🚨BREAKING: Read the Official Court Filing in the Tyler Robinson Case—Just Released😳 The establishment is trying to bury the details of the newest court filing in the Tyler Robinson case, but the actual documents prove the entire official narrative is collapsing in real-time. The state does not have an open-and-shut case. They have a massive, compromised mess, and they are scrambling. Here is exactly what the defense's new motion reveals: The prosecution's entire timeline relies on the rifle found at the scene. But the filing officially confirms that the ATF’s firearm analysis on the bullet recovered during the autopsy was "inconclusive." They cannot forensically match the bullet that killed Charlie Kirk to the weapon they claim Tyler Robinson used. The defense is literally planning to use the state's own ATF ballistics report as exculpatory evidence to clear Tyler's name. They told the public this was a lone gunman. Yet, the FBI and ATF DNA reports indicate that multiple different DNA profiles (a DNA mixture) were found on the evidence, including the rifle. The crime scene was contaminated, the weapon was handled by multiple people, and the Feds are desperately trying to sort through the mess. How is the state responding to their lack of forensic evidence? By burying the defense. The filing reveals the prosecution just dumped 20,000 electronic audio files and written documents onto Tyler’s lawyers. It is a classic stall tactic. Because the Feds' testing is so convoluted and full of mixed DNA, the defense is demanding a 6-month delay so they can bring in independent forensic biologists, genetic systems engineers, and statisticians to verify if the FBI and ATF even applied correct scientific procedures. Tyler Robinson is a scapegoat, and the physical evidence proves it. 🇺🇸⚓️

Project Constitution

67,807 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

taeyang was asked to choose between bigbang’s albums “MADE or “ALIVE” and he chose “ALIVE” he said that the members were going through a lot back then, and after the album was done, while listenting to it he cried. bigbang made this album with the determination of starting again, and he loves the music that came out of it 💙
0:59

taeyang was asked to choose between bigbang’s albums “MADE or “ALIVE” and he chose “ALIVE” he said that the members were going through a lot back then, and after the album was done, while listenting to it he cried. bigbang made this album with the determination of starting again, and he loves the music that came out of it 💙

sha

29,341 просмотров • 4 месяцев назад