Загрузка видео...

Не удалось загрузить видео

На главную

The compliment always comes first. The job question comes second. That is the real interview. How you look on Barrow Street is not how you pay for Barrow Street. One person gets flexibility. The other is already late for a shift that smiles on command. Holding hands in the...

itz_sura01's profile picture

Su-Ra

8,853 subscribers

118,269 просмотров • 14 дней назад •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

Комментарии: 0

Нет доступных комментариев

Здесь появятся комментарии из оригинального поста

Похожие видео

“I have lesbian friends” is still the most common permission slip. It is not nothing. It is also not a politics. Street interviews keep asking for a yes so the clip can end in a body. That is how allyship gets sold now: short, shirtless, and already over. The people who actually need the support are rarely the ones holding the mic. They are the ones who will still be here after the hat walks off. A good man on camera is easy. A good man when nobody is filming is the only kind that counts.
1:16

“I have lesbian friends” is still the most common permission slip. It is not nothing. It is also not a politics. Street interviews keep asking for a yes so the clip can end in a body. That is how allyship gets sold now: short, shirtless, and already over. The people who actually need the support are rarely the ones holding the mic. They are the ones who will still be here after the hat walks off. A good man on camera is easy. A good man when nobody is filming is the only kind that counts.

Ziora

124,486 просмотров • 17 дней назад

THIS LOOKS LIKE A MARATHON. IT IS ACTUALLY A COST PROBLEM. The humanoid approaches a painted spot on the track and stops. Three people in vests close in. One sprays the joints. One slams a fresh pack against the back. One lifts a metal flask and pours coolant while the machine just stands there. Then they step off the lane and the robot starts running again. That 40-second stop is the whole industry in one scene. The legs already work. Balance already works. The public already films it. What still does not work is the part companies actually pay for: runtime. swap time. heat. maintenance. how many humans it takes to keep one body moving. A factory does not buy a cool runner. A factory buys hours without a crew. Right now this machine still needs a pit team. That means the unit price is only half the number. The other half is people kneeling on the track with a flask and a battery. The first company that turns this stop into 20 seconds and one technician does not just win a race. It turns a demo into a product. Until then a humanoid is still a race car. Fast on camera. Expensive the moment it has to keep going.
0:43

THIS LOOKS LIKE A MARATHON. IT IS ACTUALLY A COST PROBLEM. The humanoid approaches a painted spot on the track and stops. Three people in vests close in. One sprays the joints. One slams a fresh pack against the back. One lifts a metal flask and pours coolant while the machine just stands there. Then they step off the lane and the robot starts running again. That 40-second stop is the whole industry in one scene. The legs already work. Balance already works. The public already films it. What still does not work is the part companies actually pay for: runtime. swap time. heat. maintenance. how many humans it takes to keep one body moving. A factory does not buy a cool runner. A factory buys hours without a crew. Right now this machine still needs a pit team. That means the unit price is only half the number. The other half is people kneeling on the track with a flask and a battery. The first company that turns this stop into 20 seconds and one technician does not just win a race. It turns a demo into a product. Until then a humanoid is still a race car. Fast on camera. Expensive the moment it has to keep going.

P1eSenb

38,791 просмотров • 9 дней назад

Mamdani: New Yorkers frankly don't care who the mayor is. If it's the first of the month, they have to pay their rent and that's what we need to be focused on and my job in the most expensive city in America is how can we make it affordable and not just on a graph but you feel it.
1:59

Mamdani: New Yorkers frankly don't care who the mayor is. If it's the first of the month, they have to pay their rent and that's what we need to be focused on and my job in the most expensive city in America is how can we make it affordable and not just on a graph but you feel it.

Acyn

197,762 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

They are in the aisle pouring extra cat litter into the jug they already picked up. Not hiding it. Not rushing. Doing it like that is how you shop. The guy asks if that is grandmas money. Answer: why would I pay for a jug that is already half empty. That is how they sell it. Then: “Does your mama know you’re a thief.” They try one more: is it stealing if they saw you walk out with it. Yes. They still took what was not yours. The store leaving the cameras on is not a coupon. This is why the honest customer pays $15 for a box of litter that finishes in a week. Shame on Wal-Mart for not giving AF!
1:10

Sensitive content

They are in the aisle pouring extra cat litter into the jug they already picked up. Not hiding it. Not rushing. Doing it like that is how you shop. The guy asks if that is grandmas money. Answer: why would I pay for a jug that is already half empty. That is how they sell it. Then: “Does your mama know you’re a thief.” They try one more: is it stealing if they saw you walk out with it. Yes. They still took what was not yours. The store leaving the cameras on is not a coupon. This is why the honest customer pays $15 for a box of litter that finishes in a week. Shame on Wal-Mart for not giving AF!

DocumentingLibs

93,060 просмотров • 19 дней назад

Ed Zitron said on Bloomberg that every dollar you spend on an AI subscription burns between three and thirteen dollars behind the scenes. The price you pay has almost nothing to do with what the product costs. Your twenty dollar plan feels cheap because it is supposed to. The real cost of running the model on your prompts is several times what you hand over. The gap is covered by venture capital, not by the business working. That gap cannot stay open forever. At some point the price has to move toward the real cost. When it does, the product you built your day around gets more expensive or gets worse. Probably both. We have already seen the preview. When Anthropic raised its real token rates last year, the startups built on top of it had to scramble. Cursor, one of the fastest growing coding tools in the world, was forced to tear up its pricing overnight because the underlying cost it had been shielded from suddenly landed on its books. That is the whole industry in miniature. Everyone downstream is building on a number that is not real yet. Millions of people are wiring AI into how they work, how they write, how they code. They are doing it at a price that exists to hook them, not to last. The subsidy is not generosity. It is a customer acquisition cost with an expiration date. The bill is coming. Most people building on top of it have no idea what their workflow actually costs. Watch the interview on Bloomberg Podcasts
0:22

Ed Zitron said on Bloomberg that every dollar you spend on an AI subscription burns between three and thirteen dollars behind the scenes. The price you pay has almost nothing to do with what the product costs. Your twenty dollar plan feels cheap because it is supposed to. The real cost of running the model on your prompts is several times what you hand over. The gap is covered by venture capital, not by the business working. That gap cannot stay open forever. At some point the price has to move toward the real cost. When it does, the product you built your day around gets more expensive or gets worse. Probably both. We have already seen the preview. When Anthropic raised its real token rates last year, the startups built on top of it had to scramble. Cursor, one of the fastest growing coding tools in the world, was forced to tear up its pricing overnight because the underlying cost it had been shielded from suddenly landed on its books. That is the whole industry in miniature. Everyone downstream is building on a number that is not real yet. Millions of people are wiring AI into how they work, how they write, how they code. They are doing it at a price that exists to hook them, not to last. The subsidy is not generosity. It is a customer acquisition cost with an expiration date. The bill is coming. Most people building on top of it have no idea what their workflow actually costs. Watch the interview on Bloomberg Podcasts

Ihtesham Ali

22,640 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

.Andrew Ross Sorkin: "When you put a tariff on a product, it is not that the other country gets taxed per se, it's that the cost gets pushed onto the consumer here in the U.S... How Trump can speak the way he does—it's just not the reality of the situation."
2:12

.Andrew Ross Sorkin: "When you put a tariff on a product, it is not that the other country gets taxed per se, it's that the cost gets pushed onto the consumer here in the U.S... How Trump can speak the way he does—it's just not the reality of the situation."

Morning Joe

501,085 просмотров • 2 лет назад

She already knows. You are still talking. Williamson calls it social radar. Tucker says men get stuck on the words and miss the room. A wife can walk into a party and read a marriage off one look. You are still hunting for a drink. Argue with him about philosophers if you want. The line that lands is quieter. Someone who has seen the snoring, the laundry, the exact place you flinch, and still does not use it. That is not softness. That is restraint with a loaded file.
1:38

She already knows. You are still talking. Williamson calls it social radar. Tucker says men get stuck on the words and miss the room. A wife can walk into a party and read a marriage off one look. You are still hunting for a drink. Argue with him about philosophers if you want. The line that lands is quieter. Someone who has seen the snoring, the laundry, the exact place you flinch, and still does not use it. That is not softness. That is restraint with a loaded file.

Camus

23,014 просмотров • 13 дней назад

Kimi K3 dropped 3 days ago and i already used it to build my own PUBG the model that just took the number one coding spot on earth and it runs on a free tier no team no engine i just fed it free open models and assets that are already public and told it what i wanted it built the entire game itself the shooting the recoil the hit detection all of it came straight out of the model i barely wrote a line what youre watching here is the deathmatch mode and its already live battle royale is next im deep in it and the graphics get reworked right after i know it looks raw right now i wont pretend otherwise but the endgame is a build that runs perfect on phones and the moment its on mobile you drop ads in and it earns on its own the part that still gets me is my whole cost for this was a single subscription
0:22

Kimi K3 dropped 3 days ago and i already used it to build my own PUBG the model that just took the number one coding spot on earth and it runs on a free tier no team no engine i just fed it free open models and assets that are already public and told it what i wanted it built the entire game itself the shooting the recoil the hit detection all of it came straight out of the model i barely wrote a line what youre watching here is the deathmatch mode and its already live battle royale is next im deep in it and the graphics get reworked right after i know it looks raw right now i wont pretend otherwise but the endgame is a build that runs perfect on phones and the moment its on mobile you drop ads in and it earns on its own the part that still gets me is my whole cost for this was a single subscription

savip.

68,984 просмотров • 2 месяцев назад

Dana White went outside at 11:05 for his daughter. He has never done that for his sons. She is a freshman. Curfew is 11. His wife is out of town and blowing up the phone. He FaceTimes. She declines him. In that house, you do not decline Dad. So he walks out. The boy who was not supposed to be the ride still brings her home. White waits to see if a father calls. The kid survives the night. He even dates her after. He never comes in the house again. That is the split he will not apologize for. The sons can take their own punches. The daughter gets him on the driveway. Then the part that sneaks up on you. He is fine when they leave. His wife is not. The first child walks out and a certain energy leaves with them. The second feels off. By the third you already know the quiet. A lot of fathers call that a double standard. He calls it the job.
2:57

Dana White went outside at 11:05 for his daughter. He has never done that for his sons. She is a freshman. Curfew is 11. His wife is out of town and blowing up the phone. He FaceTimes. She declines him. In that house, you do not decline Dad. So he walks out. The boy who was not supposed to be the ride still brings her home. White waits to see if a father calls. The kid survives the night. He even dates her after. He never comes in the house again. That is the split he will not apologize for. The sons can take their own punches. The daughter gets him on the driveway. Then the part that sneaks up on you. He is fine when they leave. His wife is not. The first child walks out and a certain energy leaves with them. The second feels off. By the third you already know the quiet. A lot of fathers call that a double standard. He calls it the job.

Camus

454,133 просмотров • 25 дней назад

Jensen Huang just drew a line through the entire global workforce. One sentence. No ambiguity. Huang: “If your job is the task, then you’re very highly going to be disrupted.” Not might be. Not eventually. Very highly going to be. That single distinction between a job and a task is the most important career diagnosis anyone will hear this decade. If you show up every day to execute a repeatable process, you are the process. And the machine runs processes better than you. Faster. Cheaper. Without breaks. Without errors. Without a salary negotiation. The moment your role can be written as a checklist, the checklist gets automated. And your desk gets cleared. That is not a warning about the future. That is a description of what is already underway. But Huang did not stop at the diagnosis. He handed you the prescription in the same breath. Huang: “If your job’s purpose includes you certain tasks, then it is vital that you go learn how to use AI to automate those tasks.” Your job includes tasks. But your job is not the tasks. Your job is the judgment around them. The decisions. The context. The instinct for why the work matters and what to do when everything breaks. That stays human. Everything else gets handed to the machine. And the person who hands it over first does not lose their job. They become more valuable than everyone still doing it by hand. Because they just converted every hour they used to spend on execution into hours spent thinking. The accountant who automates data entry does not get replaced. They become the strategist who used to be buried in spreadsheets. The marketer who automates reporting does not get fired. They become the creative who used to be trapped building dashboards. The person who refuses to automate anything becomes the most expensive way to do the cheapest work. Huang: “It is the case that the technology will dislocate and will eliminate many tasks. And because it will automate it.” No softening. No hopeful footnote. Dislocation is coming. Tasks will be eliminated. That part is settled. The only open question is which side of that line you are standing on. The side that lost the tasks. Or the side that gave them away on purpose and kept the work that actually matters. One side gets disrupted. The other side gets dangerous. The gap between those two outcomes is not talent. Not credentials. Not experience. It is whether you learned to use the machine before the machine learned to replace you. That window is still open. It is closing faster than most people are willing to believe. And it does not reopen.
0:30

Jensen Huang just drew a line through the entire global workforce. One sentence. No ambiguity. Huang: “If your job is the task, then you’re very highly going to be disrupted.” Not might be. Not eventually. Very highly going to be. That single distinction between a job and a task is the most important career diagnosis anyone will hear this decade. If you show up every day to execute a repeatable process, you are the process. And the machine runs processes better than you. Faster. Cheaper. Without breaks. Without errors. Without a salary negotiation. The moment your role can be written as a checklist, the checklist gets automated. And your desk gets cleared. That is not a warning about the future. That is a description of what is already underway. But Huang did not stop at the diagnosis. He handed you the prescription in the same breath. Huang: “If your job’s purpose includes you certain tasks, then it is vital that you go learn how to use AI to automate those tasks.” Your job includes tasks. But your job is not the tasks. Your job is the judgment around them. The decisions. The context. The instinct for why the work matters and what to do when everything breaks. That stays human. Everything else gets handed to the machine. And the person who hands it over first does not lose their job. They become more valuable than everyone still doing it by hand. Because they just converted every hour they used to spend on execution into hours spent thinking. The accountant who automates data entry does not get replaced. They become the strategist who used to be buried in spreadsheets. The marketer who automates reporting does not get fired. They become the creative who used to be trapped building dashboards. The person who refuses to automate anything becomes the most expensive way to do the cheapest work. Huang: “It is the case that the technology will dislocate and will eliminate many tasks. And because it will automate it.” No softening. No hopeful footnote. Dislocation is coming. Tasks will be eliminated. That part is settled. The only open question is which side of that line you are standing on. The side that lost the tasks. Or the side that gave them away on purpose and kept the work that actually matters. One side gets disrupted. The other side gets dangerous. The gap between those two outcomes is not talent. Not credentials. Not experience. It is whether you learned to use the machine before the machine learned to replace you. That window is still open. It is closing faster than most people are willing to believe. And it does not reopen.

Dustin

142,669 просмотров • 6 месяцев назад

🚨 Pep Guardiola on racism in football: "I said the week before. Not for where you were born or for the colour of your skin make us better or worse. There is a lot of work still to do. It is in the society, it is not [just] in football. Racism is everywhere. You pretend that racism is just for the colour of the skin? How you behave is racism. It's how you pretend you are better than the other one just for many reasons." How to improve the situation?: "The schools. Pay a lot to the teachers. That's how you deal with it. In the schools, not in football. The teachers and the doctors have to be the best, the most important people in society, by far. Not the managers."
0:44

🚨 Pep Guardiola on racism in football: "I said the week before. Not for where you were born or for the colour of your skin make us better or worse. There is a lot of work still to do. It is in the society, it is not [just] in football. Racism is everywhere. You pretend that racism is just for the colour of the skin? How you behave is racism. It's how you pretend you are better than the other one just for many reasons." How to improve the situation?: "The schools. Pay a lot to the teachers. That's how you deal with it. In the schools, not in football. The teachers and the doctors have to be the best, the most important people in society, by far. Not the managers."

CaughtOffside

39,058 просмотров • 7 месяцев назад

More than 176,000 American soldiers were killed in Europe and the Mediterranean fighting the thing these men just put back on in New York. It’s not a metaphor. They are dead. Buried. Paid for with families that never came home so that a swastika would not get a sidewalk in this country. Now watch this video. They are not confused. They tell you they are National Socialists. They tell you the swastika is how you save America. Saving it, in their words, means no more wars for Jews. They shout Free Palestine with the same arm that is wearing the rag. They hold a banner that a man is a Jew. They give the salute when someone asks for it. One of them says it straight: “we are the real Nazis. Whites and everyone else who wants to struggle against the Jews.” Zionist power, he says, comes from Jews. They also tell you they do not believe in capitalism. They say it wrecked the country and has to go. That is not a side comment. That is the program. America was not founded on National Socialism. It was founded on the thing they want to tear out. You do not get to wear the corpse of the Third Reich on Fifth Avenue and then claim you are saving the republic. You are announcing that you want a different country, and you are honest enough, for once, to wear the uniform of the last one that tried. The government let them walk. Police stood there and watched men in that armband work a Manhattan street. That is how a country tells its dead they were optional and unimportant. This is also why the place is splitting in half. One side still knows what that flag means. The other side has spent years teaching people that the only Nazis who count are the ones they already hate, while actual Nazis and actual socialists find each other on the same slogan. Mamdani should be smiling. He is a socialist. Bernie is a socialist. These men said they are socialists too, and they said it with a swastika on. Different suit but the same contempt for the system the United States of America was built on, and the same permission structure around Jews. Tucker would have them on tomorrow and call it a conversation. It is not a bloody conversation. It is a funeral the United States already paid for once. Do not dare tell me this is just free speech. A country that spent 176,000 lives killing this ideology does not owe it a parade. This is just too much. This isn’t the face of a strong country… a superpower. This is the face of a weak and broken one. And too many people are making excuses for it and why it should live and thrive on American streets. Video credit: Joshua Waterman
2:50

More than 176,000 American soldiers were killed in Europe and the Mediterranean fighting the thing these men just put back on in New York. It’s not a metaphor. They are dead. Buried. Paid for with families that never came home so that a swastika would not get a sidewalk in this country. Now watch this video. They are not confused. They tell you they are National Socialists. They tell you the swastika is how you save America. Saving it, in their words, means no more wars for Jews. They shout Free Palestine with the same arm that is wearing the rag. They hold a banner that a man is a Jew. They give the salute when someone asks for it. One of them says it straight: “we are the real Nazis. Whites and everyone else who wants to struggle against the Jews.” Zionist power, he says, comes from Jews. They also tell you they do not believe in capitalism. They say it wrecked the country and has to go. That is not a side comment. That is the program. America was not founded on National Socialism. It was founded on the thing they want to tear out. You do not get to wear the corpse of the Third Reich on Fifth Avenue and then claim you are saving the republic. You are announcing that you want a different country, and you are honest enough, for once, to wear the uniform of the last one that tried. The government let them walk. Police stood there and watched men in that armband work a Manhattan street. That is how a country tells its dead they were optional and unimportant. This is also why the place is splitting in half. One side still knows what that flag means. The other side has spent years teaching people that the only Nazis who count are the ones they already hate, while actual Nazis and actual socialists find each other on the same slogan. Mamdani should be smiling. He is a socialist. Bernie is a socialist. These men said they are socialists too, and they said it with a swastika on. Different suit but the same contempt for the system the United States of America was built on, and the same permission structure around Jews. Tucker would have them on tomorrow and call it a conversation. It is not a bloody conversation. It is a funeral the United States already paid for once. Do not dare tell me this is just free speech. A country that spent 176,000 lives killing this ideology does not owe it a parade. This is just too much. This isn’t the face of a strong country… a superpower. This is the face of a weak and broken one. And too many people are making excuses for it and why it should live and thrive on American streets. Video credit: Joshua Waterman

Mor Edge Insight

10,673 просмотров • 16 дней назад

Mark Zuckerberg just described the obsolescence of every institution on Earth and delivered it like a product update. Zuckerberg: “I just think in the future almost everyone is gonna have the power of a 10,000-person organization.” He did not say better tools. He did not say smarter apps. He said the full cognitive output of ten thousand human beings. Packaged into a product. Handed to one person. That is not an upgrade. That is the end of the reason human beings organize at all. Companies exist because one brain is not enough. Governments exist because coordination requires hierarchy. Universities exist because knowledge demands infrastructure. Every institution ever built was a workaround for the same limitation. No single person could do it alone. Zuckerberg is telling you that limitation is about to disappear. The 500-person startup becomes one founder and an AI stack. The law firm becomes one attorney and a system that never sleeps. The hospital becomes one doctor carrying every specialist in their pocket. That is not speculation. That is a deployment schedule. And the man writing it runs a 70,000-person company. He employs 70,000 people and just told the world one person will soon need none of them. That is not a prediction. That is a confession from the man who will be first to act on it. But the part nobody is discussing matters more. This technology does not land on everyone equally. It lands first on the people who already command 10,000-person organizations. Zuckerberg does not get the power of 10,000 people. He already has that. He gets the power of 10,000 organizations. Every revolution in history was sold as liberation. The printing press was supposed to democratize knowledge. It built media empires. The internet was supposed to democratize commerce. It built trillion-dollar platforms. The tool always arrives as liberation. It always settles as leverage. And leverage always consolidates upward. Zuckerberg is not wrong about the capability. One person will do what ten thousand once did. But the question nobody is asking is the only one that matters. If everyone wields the output of 10,000 people, what is a single person actually worth? And then Zuckerberg answered his own question without realizing it. Zuckerberg: “If the intelligence of a 10,000-person company is not greater than the intelligence of a single person, then what are we doing here?” He meant it as a case for AI. That is the most brutal thing a CEO has ever said about the people who work for him.
0:59

Mark Zuckerberg just described the obsolescence of every institution on Earth and delivered it like a product update. Zuckerberg: “I just think in the future almost everyone is gonna have the power of a 10,000-person organization.” He did not say better tools. He did not say smarter apps. He said the full cognitive output of ten thousand human beings. Packaged into a product. Handed to one person. That is not an upgrade. That is the end of the reason human beings organize at all. Companies exist because one brain is not enough. Governments exist because coordination requires hierarchy. Universities exist because knowledge demands infrastructure. Every institution ever built was a workaround for the same limitation. No single person could do it alone. Zuckerberg is telling you that limitation is about to disappear. The 500-person startup becomes one founder and an AI stack. The law firm becomes one attorney and a system that never sleeps. The hospital becomes one doctor carrying every specialist in their pocket. That is not speculation. That is a deployment schedule. And the man writing it runs a 70,000-person company. He employs 70,000 people and just told the world one person will soon need none of them. That is not a prediction. That is a confession from the man who will be first to act on it. But the part nobody is discussing matters more. This technology does not land on everyone equally. It lands first on the people who already command 10,000-person organizations. Zuckerberg does not get the power of 10,000 people. He already has that. He gets the power of 10,000 organizations. Every revolution in history was sold as liberation. The printing press was supposed to democratize knowledge. It built media empires. The internet was supposed to democratize commerce. It built trillion-dollar platforms. The tool always arrives as liberation. It always settles as leverage. And leverage always consolidates upward. Zuckerberg is not wrong about the capability. One person will do what ten thousand once did. But the question nobody is asking is the only one that matters. If everyone wields the output of 10,000 people, what is a single person actually worth? And then Zuckerberg answered his own question without realizing it. Zuckerberg: “If the intelligence of a 10,000-person company is not greater than the intelligence of a single person, then what are we doing here?” He meant it as a case for AI. That is the most brutal thing a CEO has ever said about the people who work for him.

Dustin

54,061 просмотров • 5 месяцев назад

Your team still use a field tarp? Learn how to use the “tarp funneling!” technique … When you don’t want to dump all the water already on the tarp into the outfield grass because it is already saturated. We had a drain over by the dugout and we learned how to get 100% of the water on the tarp into that drain. It was a lifesaver for getting in games … because our OF did not drain good at all.
0:25

Your team still use a field tarp? Learn how to use the “tarp funneling!” technique … When you don’t want to dump all the water already on the tarp into the outfield grass because it is already saturated. We had a drain over by the dugout and we learned how to get 100% of the water on the tarp into that drain. It was a lifesaver for getting in games … because our OF did not drain good at all.

Trent Mongero

100,533 просмотров • 8 месяцев назад

DYK? Every marriage already comes with a prenup. The only question is who writes it. You and the person you love… or the state. 👇
1:26

DYK? Every marriage already comes with a prenup. The only question is who writes it. You and the person you love… or the state. 👇

James J. Sexton, Esq

22,446 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад

🚨CHINESE CARS ARE EATING THE SOUTH AFRICAN MARKET AND THE BILL COMES LATER‼️ South Africa is being flooded with cheap Chinese metal🔥 Showrooms full of Haval, Chery, GWM, BYD, Changan, Omoda and the next badge that arrived last month. Big screens, fake-SUV stance, lights that dance and soft leatherette. A price that looks like a bargain next to a Volkswagen, a Toyota, a Suzuki, a BMW or a Mercedes. That is the con‼️ Youth is buying the advert, not the car, not the service book and not the trade-in🔥They see gadgets and think they stole a German interior at half the money. They did not, they bought a pretty box from a market that is being force-fed volume by a country that treats exports like a weapon‼️ Established cars earn their residuals. Toyota and Suzuki start, service and sell again. VW has parts on a shelf in this country. BMW and Mercedes cost more because the used market still respects the badge when you walk into a dealership three years later. That is not snobbery, that is a number on a valuation sheet🔥 Chinese volume brands do the opposite. Day one they look loaded. Day 800 the screen is still shiny and the offer on trade-in is "kak". Buyers discover the hard way that a car is not what it costs new🔥It is what a dealer will pay when you are done with it. That gap is where these brands live. Parts is where the romance dies. Break something on a well-known Japanese or German car and the country already has the pipeline. Break something on one of these new imports and you sit, week or sometimes months‼️ Finance does not pause while a control arm or a screen module sits on a boat. You are the one without a car. That is not “growing pains.” That is the product. This is market manipulation with a smile, flood the segment, undercut the monthly and stuff the cabin with toys. Long warranty on the brochure. Photograph it like an SUV even when the tyres and the drivetrain say city car. Take the young buyer who would have walked into Toyota, Suzuki or VW. Take the family that would have stretched for a used German‼️ Push them into something that looks expensive and depreciates like a phone. South Africa loses twice. First the customer leaves a proven brand. Then the same customer comes back poorer, waiting on parts, staring at a trade-in that does not cover the hole. The “cheap” car was never cheap. The marketing was‼️ Give it two years. That is when the first wave of owners hit real mileage, first serious failures, first refinance, first trade. Then the clever campaign from Beijing stops looking clever. It looks like a dump of disposable product into a market that cannot afford to learn the lesson twice🔥 If you want a toy with a tablet on the dash, buy the toy and admit it. If you want a car that still has a spine when you sell it, buy what this country already knows how to fix: Volkswagen, Toyota, Suzuki, BMW, Mercedes🔥 The rest is a costume. Beautiful in the parking lot but ugly on the valuation and when it breaks, you are not a customer, you are a waiting list‼️
0:31

🚨CHINESE CARS ARE EATING THE SOUTH AFRICAN MARKET AND THE BILL COMES LATER‼️ South Africa is being flooded with cheap Chinese metal🔥 Showrooms full of Haval, Chery, GWM, BYD, Changan, Omoda and the next badge that arrived last month. Big screens, fake-SUV stance, lights that dance and soft leatherette. A price that looks like a bargain next to a Volkswagen, a Toyota, a Suzuki, a BMW or a Mercedes. That is the con‼️ Youth is buying the advert, not the car, not the service book and not the trade-in🔥They see gadgets and think they stole a German interior at half the money. They did not, they bought a pretty box from a market that is being force-fed volume by a country that treats exports like a weapon‼️ Established cars earn their residuals. Toyota and Suzuki start, service and sell again. VW has parts on a shelf in this country. BMW and Mercedes cost more because the used market still respects the badge when you walk into a dealership three years later. That is not snobbery, that is a number on a valuation sheet🔥 Chinese volume brands do the opposite. Day one they look loaded. Day 800 the screen is still shiny and the offer on trade-in is "kak". Buyers discover the hard way that a car is not what it costs new🔥It is what a dealer will pay when you are done with it. That gap is where these brands live. Parts is where the romance dies. Break something on a well-known Japanese or German car and the country already has the pipeline. Break something on one of these new imports and you sit, week or sometimes months‼️ Finance does not pause while a control arm or a screen module sits on a boat. You are the one without a car. That is not “growing pains.” That is the product. This is market manipulation with a smile, flood the segment, undercut the monthly and stuff the cabin with toys. Long warranty on the brochure. Photograph it like an SUV even when the tyres and the drivetrain say city car. Take the young buyer who would have walked into Toyota, Suzuki or VW. Take the family that would have stretched for a used German‼️ Push them into something that looks expensive and depreciates like a phone. South Africa loses twice. First the customer leaves a proven brand. Then the same customer comes back poorer, waiting on parts, staring at a trade-in that does not cover the hole. The “cheap” car was never cheap. The marketing was‼️ Give it two years. That is when the first wave of owners hit real mileage, first serious failures, first refinance, first trade. Then the clever campaign from Beijing stops looking clever. It looks like a dump of disposable product into a market that cannot afford to learn the lesson twice🔥 If you want a toy with a tablet on the dash, buy the toy and admit it. If you want a car that still has a spine when you sell it, buy what this country already knows how to fix: Volkswagen, Toyota, Suzuki, BMW, Mercedes🔥 The rest is a costume. Beautiful in the parking lot but ugly on the valuation and when it breaks, you are not a customer, you are a waiting list‼️

RaiZel

153,451 просмотров • 27 дней назад

Carlos to Dazn about Liam and the penalty “The liam incident has cost me 10 points today, a possible p5 for the team, is the 4th or 5th time it has happened this season” “You can imagine my frustration, there are pilots which you can drive on parallel on a curve.. a race move i've done for years with checo, fernando, gasly, verstappen, leclerc, piastri.. for some reason we has contact with liam, is not the first time someone on the grid has had contact with liam, it is what it is" "The penalty is incomprehensible, i saw the replay and now i'm going to the stewards so someone can explain to me, as this not only concerns me but it concerts the sport” “The driver from the outside is just a passenger to what the driver in the inside decides to do, leaving you no room and on top of that touching you and on top of that the driver on the outside gets a 10s penalty?? is unheard of and it doesn't make sense” #DutchGP
2:27

Carlos to Dazn about Liam and the penalty “The liam incident has cost me 10 points today, a possible p5 for the team, is the 4th or 5th time it has happened this season” “You can imagine my frustration, there are pilots which you can drive on parallel on a curve.. a race move i've done for years with checo, fernando, gasly, verstappen, leclerc, piastri.. for some reason we has contact with liam, is not the first time someone on the grid has had contact with liam, it is what it is" "The penalty is incomprehensible, i saw the replay and now i'm going to the stewards so someone can explain to me, as this not only concerns me but it concerts the sport” “The driver from the outside is just a passenger to what the driver in the inside decides to do, leaving you no room and on top of that touching you and on top of that the driver on the outside gets a 10s penalty?? is unheard of and it doesn't make sense” #DutchGP

ari

240,386 просмотров • 1 год назад

I make games, and one of the hardest part is always the world. A map that feels real, coherent, alive. So I'm introducing Bmap. Draw a box anywhere on Earth, and it rebuilds that place as a clean 3D world: terrain, every street and building, the coast, the parks, the rivers. A real city, 1:1, in your browser, in seconds. But the map is just the first piece. Real cities are already the perfect game maps, the layout, the density, the logic of a place that actually works. Bmap's mission is to unlock them: take any real place and turn it into a living world you can shape and play in. The generator is live today. Where it goes next is the part I'm most excited about. 👀 It's free. Everyone who joined the waitlist is already in. New here? Sign in too and you're on the list, I'm opening the rest in waves. Building in public. Come watch real cities become worlds. →
1:16

I make games, and one of the hardest part is always the world. A map that feels real, coherent, alive. So I'm introducing Bmap. Draw a box anywhere on Earth, and it rebuilds that place as a clean 3D world: terrain, every street and building, the coast, the parks, the rivers. A real city, 1:1, in your browser, in seconds. But the map is just the first piece. Real cities are already the perfect game maps, the layout, the density, the logic of a place that actually works. Bmap's mission is to unlock them: take any real place and turn it into a living world you can shape and play in. The generator is live today. Where it goes next is the part I'm most excited about. 👀 It's free. Everyone who joined the waitlist is already in. New here? Sign in too and you're on the list, I'm opening the rest in waves. Building in public. Come watch real cities become worlds. →

Playda

15,163 просмотров • 3 месяцев назад