Loading video...

Video Failed to Load

Go Home

THE CONSTITUTION CANNOT WAIT FOR THE NEXT ELECTION! DELETED VOTERS, DELAYED JUSTICE—A REPUBLIC ON TRIAL. In West Bengal's SIR appeals, approximately 93% of decided appeals have resulted in inclusion. Yet lakhs of appeals remain unresolved. The Supreme Court has been told that elections are approaching while citizens await decisions...

NarendraGoswami's profile picture

NK GOSWAMI

1,885 subscribers

41,866 views • 15 days ago •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

9 Comments

M S Ramesh's profile picture
M S Ramesh15 days ago

93% of decided appeals have resulted in inclusion, what % of deleted voters have appealed will not be stated as it is less than 2% which means almost 98% omission is correct. Misuse of statistics.

anjali gupta's profile picture
anjali gupta15 days ago

Article 19 ka ullanghan ho rha hai

anjum's profile picture
anjum15 days ago

Modi se date puch ke batayege my fck lord’s

ರೇವಣ್🇮🇳's profile picture
ರೇವಣ್🇮🇳15 days ago

My lords have time to dictate but they don’t check their plate. Lakhs of cases are pending and how many people are suffering. Nobody knows the pain. Attending the court hearing for years is the biggest punishment to those go to court at the ground level

toasmatt's profile picture
toasmatt15 days ago

Darkest chapters in the history of modern India... Second emergency Death of democracy.

ॐCockroach ki Fatahॐ's profile picture
ॐCockroach ki Fatahॐ15 days ago

Sold out judges

JITENDER RANKA's profile picture
JITENDER RANKA15 days ago

KUCHH BHI. YE SAB TO CASE OPPOSITION HAAR CHUKA HAI.

Debashis Roy 🙏 🇮🇳's profile picture
Debashis Roy 🙏 🇮🇳15 days ago

SIR is about cleaning the voter list - 13% entries deleted were deceased / domicile shifted / duplicate. ECI is doing its job. Those opposing it are mostly political leaders who see it as affecting their vote bank, along with some student groups led by Dipke.

ashish's profile picture
ashish15 days ago

As per my knowledge out of 93 lakh 64 lac are deleted as they are dead..which already established too... So remaining 29 lakhs...... In every states most valid are added. So all this hooliganism is futile and a planned mischief....

Related Videos

WHEN LAWYERS ARE DRAGGED, THE CONSTITUTION IS ON TRIAL The Constitution does not confer fundamental rights as an act of governmental generosity. It guarantees them as limitations upon governmental power. When Senior Consel informed the Supreme Court that advocates had allegedly been dragged through the streets, detained in buses, and that armed miscreants had attacked citizens while the police stood by, he raised a question far greater than the dignity of the Bar. He raised the question of whether the Rule of Law still governs those entrusted with enforcing it. A policeman’s uniform is not a licence to violate liberty. Nor can Section 163 BNSS become a charter for executive absolutism. The right to peaceful protest is not extinguished because its exercise embarrasses the Government. Public order is a constitutional necessity; it cannot become a convenient euphemism for suppressing dissent. Chief Justice Surya Kant rightly emphasised the right of advocates to participate peacefully at designated locations. But the constitutional duty does not end with recognising a right. A right without an effective remedy is a constitutional promise reduced to a political platitude. The Supreme Court is not merely the highest court of the land. It is the final sentinel of those liberties which the Executive may find inconvenient and the citizen cannot afford to lose. When the State demands restraint from citizens, the Constitution demands restraint from the State. And when those who plead for justice are themselves allegedly subjected to coercion, judicial silence risks becoming the most eloquent encouragement to arbitrary power. The majesty of the Supreme Court lies not in the height of its dome, but in the courage of its judgments. — NK Goswami Advocate, Supreme Court of India #SupremeCourt #CJISuryaKant #GopalSankaranarayanan #SCBA #RuleOfLaw #ConstitutionOfIndia #CivilLiberties #DelhiProtests #NKGoswami
3:51

WHEN LAWYERS ARE DRAGGED, THE CONSTITUTION IS ON TRIAL The Constitution does not confer fundamental rights as an act of governmental generosity. It guarantees them as limitations upon governmental power. When Senior Consel informed the Supreme Court that advocates had allegedly been dragged through the streets, detained in buses, and that armed miscreants had attacked citizens while the police stood by, he raised a question far greater than the dignity of the Bar. He raised the question of whether the Rule of Law still governs those entrusted with enforcing it. A policeman’s uniform is not a licence to violate liberty. Nor can Section 163 BNSS become a charter for executive absolutism. The right to peaceful protest is not extinguished because its exercise embarrasses the Government. Public order is a constitutional necessity; it cannot become a convenient euphemism for suppressing dissent. Chief Justice Surya Kant rightly emphasised the right of advocates to participate peacefully at designated locations. But the constitutional duty does not end with recognising a right. A right without an effective remedy is a constitutional promise reduced to a political platitude. The Supreme Court is not merely the highest court of the land. It is the final sentinel of those liberties which the Executive may find inconvenient and the citizen cannot afford to lose. When the State demands restraint from citizens, the Constitution demands restraint from the State. And when those who plead for justice are themselves allegedly subjected to coercion, judicial silence risks becoming the most eloquent encouragement to arbitrary power. The majesty of the Supreme Court lies not in the height of its dome, but in the courage of its judgments. — NK Goswami Advocate, Supreme Court of India #SupremeCourt #CJISuryaKant #GopalSankaranarayanan #SCBA #RuleOfLaw #ConstitutionOfIndia #CivilLiberties #DelhiProtests #NKGoswami

NK GOSWAMI

56,444 views • 12 days ago

When a former Supreme Court judge says the right to vote is “at great peril,” it is not an opposition slogan. It is a red flag from inside the institution. Justice Rohinton Nariman, Rajkot, 27 September: In the Bengal SIR, he said, about 90 lakh voters were knocked off the rolls, and the Court did not stay it. Of those excluded, 22 lakh filed appeals. The rest, he said, were largely people without the means or the access to fight. Of roughly 1 lakh appeals decided, 93% went in the voter’s favour. EC’s own affidavit puts deleted names after adjudication at 27.16 lakh, appeals against exclusion at 22.21 lakh, and about 93% of decided appeals ending in inclusion. That is not a clean-up. That is a mass deletion that the appeal process keeps reversing. He also flagged the Indian Express report: the two Election Commissioners objected 14 times, and still did not use Section 18 to outvote the CEC. All three are appointees of this government. Then came the “patch-up.” Nariman’s ask is simple. The Supreme Court should step in. Appointments cannot stay in the hands of the government of the day. Restore the Anoop Baranwal panel: Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and the Chief Justice. You cannot have an Election Commission that functions, or malfunctions, like this. The heart of the Constitution is the vote. It is being edited and quite often mercilessly DELETED. #RightToVote #ElectionCommission #SIR #RohintonNariman #SaveDemocracy CNN BBC The Wall Street Journal Al Jazeera English
3:24

When a former Supreme Court judge says the right to vote is “at great peril,” it is not an opposition slogan. It is a red flag from inside the institution. Justice Rohinton Nariman, Rajkot, 27 September: In the Bengal SIR, he said, about 90 lakh voters were knocked off the rolls, and the Court did not stay it. Of those excluded, 22 lakh filed appeals. The rest, he said, were largely people without the means or the access to fight. Of roughly 1 lakh appeals decided, 93% went in the voter’s favour. EC’s own affidavit puts deleted names after adjudication at 27.16 lakh, appeals against exclusion at 22.21 lakh, and about 93% of decided appeals ending in inclusion. That is not a clean-up. That is a mass deletion that the appeal process keeps reversing. He also flagged the Indian Express report: the two Election Commissioners objected 14 times, and still did not use Section 18 to outvote the CEC. All three are appointees of this government. Then came the “patch-up.” Nariman’s ask is simple. The Supreme Court should step in. Appointments cannot stay in the hands of the government of the day. Restore the Anoop Baranwal panel: Prime Minister, Leader of Opposition, and the Chief Justice. You cannot have an Election Commission that functions, or malfunctions, like this. The heart of the Constitution is the vote. It is being edited and quite often mercilessly DELETED. #RightToVote #ElectionCommission #SIR #RohintonNariman #SaveDemocracy CNN BBC The Wall Street Journal Al Jazeera English

Pragnya Gupta

49,890 views • 18 days ago

I maintain that Kenya’s next General Election must be held in August 2026, not 2027. Article 136(2)(a) of the Constitution is explicit: a presidential election shall be held on the second Tuesday in August in every fifth year. The Constitution does not say after five years. It says in the fifth year. A term that runs beyond August 2026 spills into a sixth year, which the Constitution does not permit. Constitutional timelines are not elastic, and political convenience cannot override clear constitutional text. If we respect the supremacy of the Constitution, then elections must be held in August 2026.
1:03

I maintain that Kenya’s next General Election must be held in August 2026, not 2027. Article 136(2)(a) of the Constitution is explicit: a presidential election shall be held on the second Tuesday in August in every fifth year. The Constitution does not say after five years. It says in the fifth year. A term that runs beyond August 2026 spills into a sixth year, which the Constitution does not permit. Constitutional timelines are not elastic, and political convenience cannot override clear constitutional text. If we respect the supremacy of the Constitution, then elections must be held in August 2026.

Willis Evans Otieno

18,270 views • 9 months ago

#WATCH | Delhi: On the Supreme Court refusing to pass an interim order on the suspension of the Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, Advocate Shailendra Mani Tripathi says, "I filed a criminal writ petition...approximately 16 lakh appeals were filed on behalf of the Election Commission in West Bengal; however, the two Election Commissioners had raised objections regarding the basis on which these appeals were filed. I demanded the constitution of an SIT to investigate these actions—which effectively amounted to a fraud committed against voters in defiance of the law—and to initiate prosecution against those found liable. A next date has not yet been fixed for our petition. The Court will now proceed further after receiving responses from the respondents."
1:21

#WATCH | Delhi: On the Supreme Court refusing to pass an interim order on the suspension of the Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, Advocate Shailendra Mani Tripathi says, "I filed a criminal writ petition...approximately 16 lakh appeals were filed on behalf of the Election Commission in West Bengal; however, the two Election Commissioners had raised objections regarding the basis on which these appeals were filed. I demanded the constitution of an SIT to investigate these actions—which effectively amounted to a fraud committed against voters in defiance of the law—and to initiate prosecution against those found liable. A next date has not yet been fixed for our petition. The Court will now proceed further after receiving responses from the respondents."

ANI

66,038 views • 19 days ago

Addressing the Hon’ble Supreme Court, Smt. Mamata Banerjee spoke with humility and clarity, placing on record the anguish of a state whose repeated appeals have gone unanswered. She conveyed that this was not a political battle, but a constitutional appeal made when all other doors had closed. Having written multiple times to the Election Commission of India without response, she stated that her presence before the Court was driven by the belief that justice must remain accessible when institutions fail to listen. This intervention, she emphasised, was not for party interest, but for citizens whose rights cannot be left unheard. #DidiAtSupremeCourt
1:25

Addressing the Hon’ble Supreme Court, Smt. Mamata Banerjee spoke with humility and clarity, placing on record the anguish of a state whose repeated appeals have gone unanswered. She conveyed that this was not a political battle, but a constitutional appeal made when all other doors had closed. Having written multiple times to the Election Commission of India without response, she stated that her presence before the Court was driven by the belief that justice must remain accessible when institutions fail to listen. This intervention, she emphasised, was not for party interest, but for citizens whose rights cannot be left unheard. #DidiAtSupremeCourt

All India Trinamool Congress

175,358 views • 8 months ago

🚨ELECTION VICTORY.⚖️ 5th Circuit Court of Appeals delivers critical ruling that affects mail-in ballots. All ballots must now be received by Election Day in order to be counted. This U.S. court of appeals decision overrides state laws permitting post-Election Day ballot counting, affirming that federal law mandates the deadline. Judge Andrew S. Oldham stated, “The day for the election is when ballots must be both cast and received by state officials.” The ruling directly impacts Mississippi’s previous policy, which allowed ballots to be counted for up to five days after Election Day. This sets a clear precedent for election integrity and increases pressure on states to adhere strictly to this standard as the 2024 election approaches. As Justice Kavanaugh summarized in a separate Supreme Court case: “To state the obvious, a State cannot conduct an election without deadlines . . . A deadline is not unconstitutional merely because of voters’ own failures to take timely steps to ensure their franchise.” This is a huge ruling for election integrity.
1:59

🚨ELECTION VICTORY.⚖️ 5th Circuit Court of Appeals delivers critical ruling that affects mail-in ballots. All ballots must now be received by Election Day in order to be counted. This U.S. court of appeals decision overrides state laws permitting post-Election Day ballot counting, affirming that federal law mandates the deadline. Judge Andrew S. Oldham stated, “The day for the election is when ballots must be both cast and received by state officials.” The ruling directly impacts Mississippi’s previous policy, which allowed ballots to be counted for up to five days after Election Day. This sets a clear precedent for election integrity and increases pressure on states to adhere strictly to this standard as the 2024 election approaches. As Justice Kavanaugh summarized in a separate Supreme Court case: “To state the obvious, a State cannot conduct an election without deadlines . . . A deadline is not unconstitutional merely because of voters’ own failures to take timely steps to ensure their franchise.” This is a huge ruling for election integrity.

Kyle Becker

195,123 views • 2 years ago

"The right to protest is not dependent on government approval. It is protected by the Indian Constitution and international human rights law." Protesters in Delhi and Mumbai are demanding Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation amid controversy over the Election Commission’s Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. More than 130 million people have been deleted from electoral rolls since 2025. The authorities have responded by imposing prohibition orders on the protests, arresting hundreds of peaceful protesters, and suspending internet and public transport services. These actions are a blatant attack on the rights to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly. Those arbitrarily detained must be released at once, and authorities must guarantee their right to protest. #HumanityMustWin
0:48

"The right to protest is not dependent on government approval. It is protected by the Indian Constitution and international human rights law." Protesters in Delhi and Mumbai are demanding Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar’s resignation amid controversy over the Election Commission’s Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. More than 130 million people have been deleted from electoral rolls since 2025. The authorities have responded by imposing prohibition orders on the protests, arresting hundreds of peaceful protesters, and suspending internet and public transport services. These actions are a blatant attack on the rights to freedom of expression and peaceful assembly. Those arbitrarily detained must be released at once, and authorities must guarantee their right to protest. #HumanityMustWin

Amnesty International

64,726 views • 21 days ago

Luttig: If a president cannot be held accountable under the constitution for having to attempted to overturn an election that he lost fair and square, remain in power, and all the while preventing the peaceful transfer of power, then that is to cut the heart and soul out of America’s democracy and the rule of law
2:07

Luttig: If a president cannot be held accountable under the constitution for having to attempted to overturn an election that he lost fair and square, remain in power, and all the while preventing the peaceful transfer of power, then that is to cut the heart and soul out of America’s democracy and the rule of law

Acyn

802,727 views • 2 years ago

#WATCH | Delhi | On opposition protesting against the SIR exercise, Former Judge of the Delhi High Court, Justice Shiv Narayan Dhingra, says, "This entire noise is not being made by voters. It is being made by those political parties that could not win the election. If the voter has any grievance, the remedy is there. If your name is not there, you can tell the Election Commission, "I have been wrongly excluded." There is a remedy available. But condemning SIR itself, saying that SIR should not be there, is only for the purpose of ensuring that the Election Commission should not be allowed to function. SIR is a mandate given to the Election Commission by Parliament that it shall revise the electoral list every 10 years and shall remove the names of dead persons and verify whether the names of new voters have been included...There should be no person who is not a citizen of India having the right to vote. So, these are the mandates given by law to the Election Commission. The Election Commission is following these mandates, and I fail to understand how they can criticise the Election Commission for continuing or conducting SIR"
2:05

#WATCH | Delhi | On opposition protesting against the SIR exercise, Former Judge of the Delhi High Court, Justice Shiv Narayan Dhingra, says, "This entire noise is not being made by voters. It is being made by those political parties that could not win the election. If the voter has any grievance, the remedy is there. If your name is not there, you can tell the Election Commission, "I have been wrongly excluded." There is a remedy available. But condemning SIR itself, saying that SIR should not be there, is only for the purpose of ensuring that the Election Commission should not be allowed to function. SIR is a mandate given to the Election Commission by Parliament that it shall revise the electoral list every 10 years and shall remove the names of dead persons and verify whether the names of new voters have been included...There should be no person who is not a citizen of India having the right to vote. So, these are the mandates given by law to the Election Commission. The Election Commission is following these mandates, and I fail to understand how they can criticise the Election Commission for continuing or conducting SIR"

ANI

263,009 views • 17 days ago

The visuals emerging from Bengal raise serious questions about the conduct of the BJP West Bengal administration and the role of the West Bengal Police. Is this how a government treats people who come out to exercise their democratic right to protest? The police are meant to protect citizens, not instil fear in them. A government that promises justice cannot turn a blind eye to police brutality. The people of Bengal deserve dignity, justice, and accountability - not violence, intimidation, and the suppression of dissent.
4:24

The visuals emerging from Bengal raise serious questions about the conduct of the BJP West Bengal administration and the role of the West Bengal Police. Is this how a government treats people who come out to exercise their democratic right to protest? The police are meant to protect citizens, not instil fear in them. A government that promises justice cannot turn a blind eye to police brutality. The people of Bengal deserve dignity, justice, and accountability - not violence, intimidation, and the suppression of dissent.

All India Trinamool Congress

29,633 views • 11 days ago

THE CONSTITUTION PROTECTS PROTEST — NOT A PRIVILEGE TO DISOBEY THE LAW. JANTAR MANTAR, THE COCKROACH JANTA PARTY AND THE LIMITS OF CONSTITUTIONAL DISSENT The Delhi High Court's questions to CJP leaders Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka go to the heart of constitutional democracy. If you have executed a peace bond, what legal justification permits you to disregard its conditions? If Parliament has provided a statutory appellate remedy under Section 414 BNSS for specified security and surety orders, why bypass that remedy without establishing exceptional grounds? And if the Government has designated alternative protest sites, why insist upon entering a restricted location rather than pursuing lawful remedies? THE RIGHT TO PROTEST IS NOT THE RIGHT TO CHOOSE WHICH LAWS ONE WILL OBEY. But the Constitution places an equally serious duty upon the State. A PEACE BOND CANNOT BECOME A BOND OF POLITICAL SILENCE. No administration may use preventive powers to punish citizens merely for expressing dissent. Every restriction must satisfy the law; every detention must withstand judicial scrutiny. THE CONSTITUTION RECOGNISES NEITHER AN UNACCOUNTABLE GOVERNMENT NOR AN UNACCOUNTABLE PROTESTER. Political passion cannot replace legal discipline. State authority cannot replace constitutional restraint. THE RULE OF LAW IS NOT A WEAPON TO BE USED AGAINST ONE SIDE. IT IS THE STANDARD BY WHICH BOTH SIDES MUST BE JUDGED. — NK Goswami Advocate, Supreme Court of India #DelhiHighCourt #JantarMantar #CockroachJantaParty #RightToProtest #SupremeCourt #BNSS #SauravDas #AshutoshRanka #DelhiPolice #Article226 #RuleOfLaw #ConstitutionOfIndia #NKGoswami Cockroaches of India Cockroach Janta Party - CJP Cockroach Janta Party Rahul Gandhi Prashant Bhushan Mahesh Jethmalani Kapil Sibal Akhilesh Yadav Mohan Bhagwat RSS Donald J. Trump Elon Musk Sanjay Singh AAP Sanjay Dutt
3:22

THE CONSTITUTION PROTECTS PROTEST — NOT A PRIVILEGE TO DISOBEY THE LAW. JANTAR MANTAR, THE COCKROACH JANTA PARTY AND THE LIMITS OF CONSTITUTIONAL DISSENT The Delhi High Court's questions to CJP leaders Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka go to the heart of constitutional democracy. If you have executed a peace bond, what legal justification permits you to disregard its conditions? If Parliament has provided a statutory appellate remedy under Section 414 BNSS for specified security and surety orders, why bypass that remedy without establishing exceptional grounds? And if the Government has designated alternative protest sites, why insist upon entering a restricted location rather than pursuing lawful remedies? THE RIGHT TO PROTEST IS NOT THE RIGHT TO CHOOSE WHICH LAWS ONE WILL OBEY. But the Constitution places an equally serious duty upon the State. A PEACE BOND CANNOT BECOME A BOND OF POLITICAL SILENCE. No administration may use preventive powers to punish citizens merely for expressing dissent. Every restriction must satisfy the law; every detention must withstand judicial scrutiny. THE CONSTITUTION RECOGNISES NEITHER AN UNACCOUNTABLE GOVERNMENT NOR AN UNACCOUNTABLE PROTESTER. Political passion cannot replace legal discipline. State authority cannot replace constitutional restraint. THE RULE OF LAW IS NOT A WEAPON TO BE USED AGAINST ONE SIDE. IT IS THE STANDARD BY WHICH BOTH SIDES MUST BE JUDGED. — NK Goswami Advocate, Supreme Court of India #DelhiHighCourt #JantarMantar #CockroachJantaParty #RightToProtest #SupremeCourt #BNSS #SauravDas #AshutoshRanka #DelhiPolice #Article226 #RuleOfLaw #ConstitutionOfIndia #NKGoswami Cockroaches of India Cockroach Janta Party - CJP Cockroach Janta Party Rahul Gandhi Prashant Bhushan Mahesh Jethmalani Kapil Sibal Akhilesh Yadav Mohan Bhagwat RSS Donald J. Trump Elon Musk Sanjay Singh AAP Sanjay Dutt

NK GOSWAMI

386,626 views • 3 days ago

Kamala Harris: A fundamental principle of American democracy is that when we lose an election we accept the results. And anyone who seeks the public trust must honor it. At the same, we owe loyalty not to a president or a party but to the constitution
2:12

Kamala Harris: A fundamental principle of American democracy is that when we lose an election we accept the results. And anyone who seeks the public trust must honor it. At the same, we owe loyalty not to a president or a party but to the constitution

Acyn

453,705 views • 1 year ago

#WATCH | Mumbai, Maharashtra: On the result of the Assembly elections, Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut says, "I believe this is not a victory for democracy. It is definitely a victory for PM Modi and Amit Shah. Just like in West Bengal and other states, the names of millions of voters were deleted through SIR, and they did not get the right to vote. There is a difference of 11 lakh votes between victory and defeat. If 9 lakh votes are cut, how can it be a victory for PM Modi and Amit Shah?... I have seen this type of election in Pakistan, Russia, and Azerbaijan. This type of election is not even an election. The results are fixed first, and then the elections are held..."
2:13

#WATCH | Mumbai, Maharashtra: On the result of the Assembly elections, Shiv Sena (UBT) leader Sanjay Raut says, "I believe this is not a victory for democracy. It is definitely a victory for PM Modi and Amit Shah. Just like in West Bengal and other states, the names of millions of voters were deleted through SIR, and they did not get the right to vote. There is a difference of 11 lakh votes between victory and defeat. If 9 lakh votes are cut, how can it be a victory for PM Modi and Amit Shah?... I have seen this type of election in Pakistan, Russia, and Azerbaijan. This type of election is not even an election. The results are fixed first, and then the elections are held..."

ANI

11,436 views • 5 months ago

The Constitution Does Not Empower a President To Remove or Suspend a Governor, Even For a Day - Falana What the President is asked to do under Section 305 of the Constitution is to impose a state of emergency and adopt extraordinary measures to restore law and order. Our courts must address this matter; we cannot operate a democratic system of government where the courts fail to make pronouncements on serious infractions of the Constitution. Femi Falana, SAN
4:53

The Constitution Does Not Empower a President To Remove or Suspend a Governor, Even For a Day - Falana What the President is asked to do under Section 305 of the Constitution is to impose a state of emergency and adopt extraordinary measures to restore law and order. Our courts must address this matter; we cannot operate a democratic system of government where the courts fail to make pronouncements on serious infractions of the Constitution. Femi Falana, SAN

ARISE NEWS

70,396 views • 1 year ago

#WATCH | Delhi: On Supreme Court rejecting her plea, Congress leader Meenakshi Natarajan says, "This is not a personal setback. This is a setback to the democracy and the Constitution of India... I said this in the beginning that the members of the Election Commission were compromised. When our people when to the Election Commission, they did not answer us for 48 hours. The Supreme Court atlease heard our plea and gave a verdict..."
1:00

#WATCH | Delhi: On Supreme Court rejecting her plea, Congress leader Meenakshi Natarajan says, "This is not a personal setback. This is a setback to the democracy and the Constitution of India... I said this in the beginning that the members of the Election Commission were compromised. When our people when to the Election Commission, they did not answer us for 48 hours. The Supreme Court atlease heard our plea and gave a verdict..."

ANI

49,934 views • 4 months ago

#WATCH | Delhi: On SC judge Justice Ujjal Bhuyan's views on citizens' right to vote, Former Judge at the Uttarakhand High Court, Lokpal Singh, says, "As far as intensive revision of votes is concerned, it is a normal process. The Election Commission of India is engaged in this process throughout the year for adding or deleting the names of the voters... intensive revisions should be done. So far as gross deletion of names is concerned, it is the ECI that can see it better. It's always easy to say that thousands of votes have been deleted. But when the people and the population of the particular states... Bihar and West Bengal, both the states are adjoining Bangladesh. Infiltration cannot be denied. So many fake votes are there. If the ECI, after verification, has deleted the names of so many persons, and those persons who have not come—for them, so many institutions are coming forward saying, 'Yes, a bulk of voters have been deleted in Bihar or West Bengal.' I feel that no one can deny the infiltration from West Bengal... So, a change of govt is one part. I feel that no one should blame the Central govt, saying that due to their intervention in West Bengal, the regime has changed..." On Justice Nariman's remarks, he says, "Justice Nariman is a jurist of this country. I have a great respect for Justice Nariman. But so far as the statement of the election of West Bengal is concerned, I do not agree with Justice Nariman. 90 lakhs were deleted... now you have been watching the news that after the elections, so many persons traveled from West Bengal to Bangladesh. Can anyone question this? Can anyone find out from where they came and why they are returning to Bangladesh? If they were citizens of India, they should not have traveled from West Bengal to Bangladesh, so I do not have any agreement with Justice Nariman on this point..."
8:18

#WATCH | Delhi: On SC judge Justice Ujjal Bhuyan's views on citizens' right to vote, Former Judge at the Uttarakhand High Court, Lokpal Singh, says, "As far as intensive revision of votes is concerned, it is a normal process. The Election Commission of India is engaged in this process throughout the year for adding or deleting the names of the voters... intensive revisions should be done. So far as gross deletion of names is concerned, it is the ECI that can see it better. It's always easy to say that thousands of votes have been deleted. But when the people and the population of the particular states... Bihar and West Bengal, both the states are adjoining Bangladesh. Infiltration cannot be denied. So many fake votes are there. If the ECI, after verification, has deleted the names of so many persons, and those persons who have not come—for them, so many institutions are coming forward saying, 'Yes, a bulk of voters have been deleted in Bihar or West Bengal.' I feel that no one can deny the infiltration from West Bengal... So, a change of govt is one part. I feel that no one should blame the Central govt, saying that due to their intervention in West Bengal, the regime has changed..." On Justice Nariman's remarks, he says, "Justice Nariman is a jurist of this country. I have a great respect for Justice Nariman. But so far as the statement of the election of West Bengal is concerned, I do not agree with Justice Nariman. 90 lakhs were deleted... now you have been watching the news that after the elections, so many persons traveled from West Bengal to Bangladesh. Can anyone question this? Can anyone find out from where they came and why they are returning to Bangladesh? If they were citizens of India, they should not have traveled from West Bengal to Bangladesh, so I do not have any agreement with Justice Nariman on this point..."

ANI

135,794 views • 19 days ago

"Elections belong to American citizens, even if one non-citizen votes in an election, that is a violation of the constitutional rights of every voter in California who has a legal right to have their vote be counted equally and not diluted by non-citizens" F.A. United States Attorney Bill Essayli on Operation Protect the Vote.
0:35

"Elections belong to American citizens, even if one non-citizen votes in an election, that is a violation of the constitutional rights of every voter in California who has a legal right to have their vote be counted equally and not diluted by non-citizens" F.A. United States Attorney Bill Essayli on Operation Protect the Vote.

Homeland Security

65,598 views • 4 days ago

#WATCH | On the Delhi SIR draft list, AAP Delhi President Saurabh Bhardwaj says, “For any person whose vote has been deleted, the authorities are disclosing neither the address nor the phone number. Consequently, even a party worker cannot locate or identify the individual to verify whether the vote was deleted correctly or not. This is a surreptitious and forceful exercise where the votes of the poor are being selectively deleted. Does the Bharatiya Janata Party mean to imply that the one-third of Delhi’s population whose votes were deleted consists of Bangladeshis? And if they are citizens, by what right did you delete their votes? India has effectively become a laughingstock on the global stage; it has turned into a joke that one-third of the votes in the nation’s capital have been deleted...”
3:24

#WATCH | On the Delhi SIR draft list, AAP Delhi President Saurabh Bhardwaj says, “For any person whose vote has been deleted, the authorities are disclosing neither the address nor the phone number. Consequently, even a party worker cannot locate or identify the individual to verify whether the vote was deleted correctly or not. This is a surreptitious and forceful exercise where the votes of the poor are being selectively deleted. Does the Bharatiya Janata Party mean to imply that the one-third of Delhi’s population whose votes were deleted consists of Bangladeshis? And if they are citizens, by what right did you delete their votes? India has effectively become a laughingstock on the global stage; it has turned into a joke that one-third of the votes in the nation’s capital have been deleted...”

ANI

21,738 views • 1 month ago

As Co-Convenor of the People's Coalition on Electoral Reforms, I joined fellow leaders today to reaffirm a simple, non-negotiable demand: the 2027 general election, particularly the presidential election, must be held strictly in accordance with the Constitution. This process is anchored in Articles 1, 38, 81, and 86, the Elections Act, the Election Offences Act, and the jurisprudence of our courts, including the Maina Kiai case and the Supreme Court decisions of 2017 and 2022. Anything not in the Constitution cannot be allowed.
1:10

As Co-Convenor of the People's Coalition on Electoral Reforms, I joined fellow leaders today to reaffirm a simple, non-negotiable demand: the 2027 general election, particularly the presidential election, must be held strictly in accordance with the Constitution. This process is anchored in Articles 1, 38, 81, and 86, the Elections Act, the Election Offences Act, and the jurisprudence of our courts, including the Maina Kiai case and the Supreme Court decisions of 2017 and 2022. Anything not in the Constitution cannot be allowed.

David Maraga

75,205 views • 1 month ago

“What is a democracy if every citizen does not get to exercise his right to vote? And this exercise of the SIR has been more in the nature of disenfranchising voters...The process of appointment of the Election Commission should be a much fairer system”- Justice Deepak Gupta, former SC judge #SIR #ElectionCommission #ECI #RightToVote #VoterRights #ElectoralRolls #NewsToday Rajdeep Sardesai
5:39

“What is a democracy if every citizen does not get to exercise his right to vote? And this exercise of the SIR has been more in the nature of disenfranchising voters...The process of appointment of the Election Commission should be a much fairer system”- Justice Deepak Gupta, former SC judge #SIR #ElectionCommission #ECI #RightToVote #VoterRights #ElectoralRolls #NewsToday Rajdeep Sardesai

IndiaToday

39,290 views • 25 days ago