Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

The Constitution doesn’t mandate ‘nation over religion’ rhetoric; it mandates equality before law and freedom of religion. If Mufti Shamail Nadwi is targeted, the same legal test must apply to Hindu dharm gurus saying religion > nation. Selective enforcement violates Art. 14. 👇🏻

taab_e_sukhan's profile picture

مصطفى

3,896 subscribers

44,256 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Mexican Americans confronted Muslims on the National Day of Prayer in Los Angeles. "This is not Europe. Go back to the Middle East with that religion.” Sharia law has no place in America. It violates the Constitution. Even Mexican Americans see the incompatibility.
0:18

Mexican Americans confronted Muslims on the National Day of Prayer in Los Angeles. "This is not Europe. Go back to the Middle East with that religion.” Sharia law has no place in America. It violates the Constitution. Even Mexican Americans see the incompatibility.

MatrixMysteries

150,035 Aufrufe • vor 14 Tagen

"Vijay Thalapathy Jai Bhim Rally." Be it Pradhan, Prime Minister, or any other leader.., anyone who truly loves the nation and wishes to lead it must bow down before BABASAHEB DR. AMBEDKAR. Because they know who laid the foundation of equality and the Constitution of India.
0:14

"Vijay Thalapathy Jai Bhim Rally." Be it Pradhan, Prime Minister, or any other leader.., anyone who truly loves the nation and wishes to lead it must bow down before BABASAHEB DR. AMBEDKAR. Because they know who laid the foundation of equality and the Constitution of India.

Mission Ambedkar

12,148 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Muslims are confronted on National Day of Prayer in Los Angeles, California by Mexican Americans They shout to their faces “This is not Europe, go back to Middle East with that religion” America will never tolerate Sharia Law, it is in direct violation with the US Constitution. Islam is not compatible with Western Civilization and even Mexican Americans know it
0:18

Muslims are confronted on National Day of Prayer in Los Angeles, California by Mexican Americans They shout to their faces “This is not Europe, go back to Middle East with that religion” America will never tolerate Sharia Law, it is in direct violation with the US Constitution. Islam is not compatible with Western Civilization and even Mexican Americans know it

Wall Street Apes

1,309,717 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

“𝗬𝗲𝗵 𝗹𝗼𝗴 ‘𝗦𝗶𝘁𝗮 𝗸𝗲 𝗣𝗮𝘁𝗶’ 𝗸𝗮 𝗻𝗮𝗮𝗺 𝗹𝗲 𝗸𝗲, 𝗡𝗶𝘁𝗮 𝗸𝗲 𝗣𝗮𝘁𝗶 𝗸𝗮 𝗸𝗮𝗮𝗺 𝗸𝗮𝗿 𝗿𝗮𝗵𝗲 𝗵𝗮𝗶𝗻” The foul mouthed Kunal Kamra has once again chosen to insult Prabhu Shri Ram, hurting the faith of millions of Hindus. Hindu Dharma has always taught tolerance, but that tolerance is repeatedly taken for granted. Our gods, our traditions and our beliefs are mocked again and again, shamelessly. Respect cannot be selective. If you're always careful to address every other religion with dignity, then Hinduism deserves the same respect. Freedom of expression is not a licence to insult the faith of millions. Sad to see Hindus in that crowd cheering to his crass humour. The joke is on you, guys!!
0:15

“𝗬𝗲𝗵 𝗹𝗼𝗴 ‘𝗦𝗶𝘁𝗮 𝗸𝗲 𝗣𝗮𝘁𝗶’ 𝗸𝗮 𝗻𝗮𝗮𝗺 𝗹𝗲 𝗸𝗲, 𝗡𝗶𝘁𝗮 𝗸𝗲 𝗣𝗮𝘁𝗶 𝗸𝗮 𝗸𝗮𝗮𝗺 𝗸𝗮𝗿 𝗿𝗮𝗵𝗲 𝗵𝗮𝗶𝗻” The foul mouthed Kunal Kamra has once again chosen to insult Prabhu Shri Ram, hurting the faith of millions of Hindus. Hindu Dharma has always taught tolerance, but that tolerance is repeatedly taken for granted. Our gods, our traditions and our beliefs are mocked again and again, shamelessly. Respect cannot be selective. If you're always careful to address every other religion with dignity, then Hinduism deserves the same respect. Freedom of expression is not a licence to insult the faith of millions. Sad to see Hindus in that crowd cheering to his crass humour. The joke is on you, guys!!

Priti Gandhi

11,664 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

If Islam is a religion of peace, why do Muslims around the world continue to repeat Hamas’s blood libels against Israel—even after Hamas murdered over 1,000 Jews and kidnapped hundreds more? Instead of condemning the jihadists who committed atrocities in Islam’s name, they defend the Muslim perpetrators. And instead of rejecting jihad, they support and glorify Hamas, which deliberately uses hospitals, schools, and mosques as military bases and rocket launch sites. The Muslim Mayor of New York, like the overwhelming majority of Muslim politicians in the West, proves once again that Islam is not a religion of peace. If they truly cared about the people of Gaza, they would reject the death cult that prioritizes jihad and martyrdom over peace and human life. Yet they continue to worship the same doctrine that turns children into human shields and human bombs.
0:13

If Islam is a religion of peace, why do Muslims around the world continue to repeat Hamas’s blood libels against Israel—even after Hamas murdered over 1,000 Jews and kidnapped hundreds more? Instead of condemning the jihadists who committed atrocities in Islam’s name, they defend the Muslim perpetrators. And instead of rejecting jihad, they support and glorify Hamas, which deliberately uses hospitals, schools, and mosques as military bases and rocket launch sites. The Muslim Mayor of New York, like the overwhelming majority of Muslim politicians in the West, proves once again that Islam is not a religion of peace. If they truly cared about the people of Gaza, they would reject the death cult that prioritizes jihad and martyrdom over peace and human life. Yet they continue to worship the same doctrine that turns children into human shields and human bombs.

Liza Rosen

12,606 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

Comments on Modi by Telugu YouTuber Ravan Joseph, Recently Arrested in a Sedition Related Case See the kind of remarks he made about the Prime Minister of India. This wasn’t limited to the Prime Minister alone - this alleged YCP payroll operative also targeted Hindu deities, political opponents, and many others with abusive language. " మతాన్ని వాడుకొని శవాల మీద రాజకీయం చేసిన వాడు విశ్వగురు అయ్యాడు " The man who weaponized religion and did politics over dead bodies is now called the “Vishwaguru.”
0:15

Comments on Modi by Telugu YouTuber Ravan Joseph, Recently Arrested in a Sedition Related Case See the kind of remarks he made about the Prime Minister of India. This wasn’t limited to the Prime Minister alone - this alleged YCP payroll operative also targeted Hindu deities, political opponents, and many others with abusive language. " మతాన్ని వాడుకొని శవాల మీద రాజకీయం చేసిన వాడు విశ్వగురు అయ్యాడు " The man who weaponized religion and did politics over dead bodies is now called the “Vishwaguru.”

Telugu360

47,390 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Your extreme hatred towards Hinduism will lead to your downfall, Thiru Udhay! The fact that you spoke about abolishing Sanatana Dharma, the faith of hundreds of millions of Hindus, in your very first Assembly speech only shows that you are not yet politically mature. The relentless targeting of Hindus is utterly deplorable and deserves the strongest condemnation. The reason you have been demoted from Deputy Chief Minister to Leader of the Opposition is that you once publicly declared “I will abolish Sanatana Dharma” thereby earning the undying hatred of Hindus. Therefore, if you wish to grow further in politics, it is essential that you cast aside the hatred you harbour towards a particular religion and truly embrace religious harmony. You must henceforth understand that for every person belonging to each religion, Hindu, Muslim, or Christian - their religious identity and beliefs are of utmost importance. Remember that if you instead continue to belittle the beliefs of Hindus and attempt to do political based on religion, you will fall into a pit from which there is no return. Furthermore, Tamil Nadu is now eagerly watching to see how Chief Minister TVK Vijay, who has formed a government elected by the people - will respond to this hate campaign.
0:10

Your extreme hatred towards Hinduism will lead to your downfall, Thiru Udhay! The fact that you spoke about abolishing Sanatana Dharma, the faith of hundreds of millions of Hindus, in your very first Assembly speech only shows that you are not yet politically mature. The relentless targeting of Hindus is utterly deplorable and deserves the strongest condemnation. The reason you have been demoted from Deputy Chief Minister to Leader of the Opposition is that you once publicly declared “I will abolish Sanatana Dharma” thereby earning the undying hatred of Hindus. Therefore, if you wish to grow further in politics, it is essential that you cast aside the hatred you harbour towards a particular religion and truly embrace religious harmony. You must henceforth understand that for every person belonging to each religion, Hindu, Muslim, or Christian - their religious identity and beliefs are of utmost importance. Remember that if you instead continue to belittle the beliefs of Hindus and attempt to do political based on religion, you will fall into a pit from which there is no return. Furthermore, Tamil Nadu is now eagerly watching to see how Chief Minister TVK Vijay, who has formed a government elected by the people - will respond to this hate campaign.

Nainar Nagenthran

10,926 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal dismissed a House hearing on Sharia law as "bizarre" and accused lawmakers of turning every mosque into a "beachhead of terrorism" while declaring Islam to be a "very very important religion" in the United States. Sharia operates on rules that reject the single legal system every American must follow. These are not cultural quirks. They are fundamental differences that prevent Islam from ever fully assimilating into a society defined by equal rights under one Constitution. Jayapal’s praise changes none of that reality.
0:18

Congresswoman Pramila Jayapal dismissed a House hearing on Sharia law as "bizarre" and accused lawmakers of turning every mosque into a "beachhead of terrorism" while declaring Islam to be a "very very important religion" in the United States. Sharia operates on rules that reject the single legal system every American must follow. These are not cultural quirks. They are fundamental differences that prevent Islam from ever fully assimilating into a society defined by equal rights under one Constitution. Jayapal’s praise changes none of that reality.

Media Lies

66,020 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

To Muslims who have seen the footage of Iranians burning mosques over the past days. One point must be made clear. The Islamic Republic is not merely using religion as a political tool. It is using religion as physical cover to carry out mass murder. My friends were present the day the first mosque was burned on Friday. I asked them what exactly they burned, because it was unclear on the video. They anwsered: “A mosque. But they were shooting at people from the inside.” If you believe it is acceptable to use a mosque as a military position to fire on civilians, then my conversation with you ends here. If you do not, then you should stand with the people of Iran, who are fighting a regime that exploits your religion to commit crimes in its name. The late Shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, was a devout Muslim. He survived multiple assassination attempts by Islamo-Marxists and other extremists. Those experiences brought him closer to God and to Islam. This may not resonate with everyone, but he remains the single historical figure I admire and respect most, and I will not speak against what he believed in. To my fellow Iranians, please read his book: 'Answer to History'. Today, it is his son, Reza Pahlavi, whom the people have chosen as their leader. Reza Pahlavi seeks internal peace for Iran. But internal peace is impossible without regional peace. A country does not exist in isolation. It is like buying a house, renovating it, and turning it into a beautiful place to live. If the neighbouring houses are crack dens, filled with violence and instability, your house will never truly be safe, nor will it hold its value. Under his leadership, religion will be separated from the state. Not erased. Separated. And an Iran without an antagonistic Islamic regime will bring regional stability. That stability will save the lives of millions of Muslims in the years to come.
0:13

To Muslims who have seen the footage of Iranians burning mosques over the past days. One point must be made clear. The Islamic Republic is not merely using religion as a political tool. It is using religion as physical cover to carry out mass murder. My friends were present the day the first mosque was burned on Friday. I asked them what exactly they burned, because it was unclear on the video. They anwsered: “A mosque. But they were shooting at people from the inside.” If you believe it is acceptable to use a mosque as a military position to fire on civilians, then my conversation with you ends here. If you do not, then you should stand with the people of Iran, who are fighting a regime that exploits your religion to commit crimes in its name. The late Shah of Iran, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, was a devout Muslim. He survived multiple assassination attempts by Islamo-Marxists and other extremists. Those experiences brought him closer to God and to Islam. This may not resonate with everyone, but he remains the single historical figure I admire and respect most, and I will not speak against what he believed in. To my fellow Iranians, please read his book: 'Answer to History'. Today, it is his son, Reza Pahlavi, whom the people have chosen as their leader. Reza Pahlavi seeks internal peace for Iran. But internal peace is impossible without regional peace. A country does not exist in isolation. It is like buying a house, renovating it, and turning it into a beautiful place to live. If the neighbouring houses are crack dens, filled with violence and instability, your house will never truly be safe, nor will it hold its value. Under his leadership, religion will be separated from the state. Not erased. Separated. And an Iran without an antagonistic Islamic regime will bring regional stability. That stability will save the lives of millions of Muslims in the years to come.

Arsalan Naamdar

18,294 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

She is Yuval from America. He is Kaushil from India. Beautiful and happy couples of Indian men and Western women are increasing day by day. Remember, guys, don't become a retirement plan in an arranged marriage. Dharma belongs to men. There is nothing like marrying only a Hindu girl; whoever you marry becomes a Hindu. A wife and kids always follow the religion of their husband. Sanatani culture is built and protected by Hindu men. Hindu men will decide which women can adopt it. If Indian feminist girls promote a high body count, sleeping around, short clothes, and being against Hindu customs and culture, then Indian men should marry women who truly love and respect them.
0:17

She is Yuval from America. He is Kaushil from India. Beautiful and happy couples of Indian men and Western women are increasing day by day. Remember, guys, don't become a retirement plan in an arranged marriage. Dharma belongs to men. There is nothing like marrying only a Hindu girl; whoever you marry becomes a Hindu. A wife and kids always follow the religion of their husband. Sanatani culture is built and protected by Hindu men. Hindu men will decide which women can adopt it. If Indian feminist girls promote a high body count, sleeping around, short clothes, and being against Hindu customs and culture, then Indian men should marry women who truly love and respect them.

︎ ︎venom

29,365 Aufrufe • vor 26 Tagen

Today a group of Muslims prayed next to the Ministry of Defence, facing the Iraq and Afghanistan memorial. As I have said before, choosing to pray in this way in public is a political act. It is a social statement and, yes, it is an act of domination. Anybody who understands Islamism understands that the domination of public spaces is part of the modus operandi. It is done so Islamists can show who is in charge - and to show other Muslims and the wider public that the authorities will bend to their will. There is quite obviously no need to pray here. The decision to do so is symbolic and pointed. It is not welcome. We have freedom of religion in this country, which is why there are mosques. But we are not a Muslim country and this is not welcome. It should be stopped.
0:10

Today a group of Muslims prayed next to the Ministry of Defence, facing the Iraq and Afghanistan memorial. As I have said before, choosing to pray in this way in public is a political act. It is a social statement and, yes, it is an act of domination. Anybody who understands Islamism understands that the domination of public spaces is part of the modus operandi. It is done so Islamists can show who is in charge - and to show other Muslims and the wider public that the authorities will bend to their will. There is quite obviously no need to pray here. The decision to do so is symbolic and pointed. It is not welcome. We have freedom of religion in this country, which is why there are mosques. But we are not a Muslim country and this is not welcome. It should be stopped.

Nick Timothy MP

1,477,346 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

During Operation Sindoor, Sharmistha, a law student, spoke out, her words regrettable and hurtful to some. She owned her mistake, deleted the video and apologized. The WB Police swiftly acted, taking action against Sharmistha. But what about the deep, searing pain inflicted upon millions when elected leaders, MPs of TMC, mock Sanatana Dharma? Where is the outrage when our faith is called 'Gandha Dharm'? Where is their apology? Where is their swift arrest? Blasphemy must be condemned, always! Secularism isn't a shield for some and a sword for others. It must be a two-way street. West Bengal Police, the nation is watching. Act justly for all. #IstandwithSharmistha. #EqualJustice
0:10

During Operation Sindoor, Sharmistha, a law student, spoke out, her words regrettable and hurtful to some. She owned her mistake, deleted the video and apologized. The WB Police swiftly acted, taking action against Sharmistha. But what about the deep, searing pain inflicted upon millions when elected leaders, MPs of TMC, mock Sanatana Dharma? Where is the outrage when our faith is called 'Gandha Dharm'? Where is their apology? Where is their swift arrest? Blasphemy must be condemned, always! Secularism isn't a shield for some and a sword for others. It must be a two-way street. West Bengal Police, the nation is watching. Act justly for all. #IstandwithSharmistha. #EqualJustice

Pawan Kalyan

2,799,135 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Dear Nigerians, "Patriotism means to stand by the country. It does not mean to stand by the president." ~Theodore Roosevelt On this national scale, if the mass number of Nigerians are suffering, their lives and properties in jeopardy, it is okay to speak up, call a spade a spade and stop this gov from leading us astray. Now more than ever, we must unite. We must unite against the ruiners of Nigeria before they bury what is left of her. Organization is the first primary weapon of the oppressed. This is the only weapon we are yet to explore, and we can not explore this until we unite. The oppressed Nigerians must organize to form a force against the ruiners of Nigeria and take back our country to have a system that is for the benefit of the Nigerian people and not a few in the position of power. President will come and go, only the people will remain. Don't give those in power today to play politics with your future. Let's unite, not necessary as one but as a team. A team with different skills, languages culture, religion and tradition, but one CAUSE regardless of our tribal differences to stand against the common enemy who have now shown to be a curse on our very own existence as an amazing people of this great nation. ~OIA✊🏿
0:15

Dear Nigerians, "Patriotism means to stand by the country. It does not mean to stand by the president." ~Theodore Roosevelt On this national scale, if the mass number of Nigerians are suffering, their lives and properties in jeopardy, it is okay to speak up, call a spade a spade and stop this gov from leading us astray. Now more than ever, we must unite. We must unite against the ruiners of Nigeria before they bury what is left of her. Organization is the first primary weapon of the oppressed. This is the only weapon we are yet to explore, and we can not explore this until we unite. The oppressed Nigerians must organize to form a force against the ruiners of Nigeria and take back our country to have a system that is for the benefit of the Nigerian people and not a few in the position of power. President will come and go, only the people will remain. Don't give those in power today to play politics with your future. Let's unite, not necessary as one but as a team. A team with different skills, languages culture, religion and tradition, but one CAUSE regardless of our tribal differences to stand against the common enemy who have now shown to be a curse on our very own existence as an amazing people of this great nation. ~OIA✊🏿

𝐎i𝐀

13,158 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

American Muslim scholar, Hamza Yusuf co-founder of the Zaytuna College declares that “the whole concept of an ‘Islamic state’ is a fantasy in the minds of the modern Islamists” & confirms that the vast majority of Muslim states in history were “secular” (see above post for what he means by ‘secular’). As I recently argued in my Oxford Union debate - which we won - the reading into Islamic sources of the modern idea of a unitary legal ‘state’ (dawlah) over all of society, is an anachronism. It is the retrospective imposition of the European Westphalian nation-state concept onto traditional Islamic sources. The word ‘state’ (dawlah) is entirely absent from *all* Islamic sources of Shariah. As is the word ‘law’ (Qānūn) and as is the word ‘constitution’ (Distūr). It is thus impossible for the term ‘Islamic State’ to be anything other than a modernist reading. And Shariah is not a ‘law’ (the concept of unitary legal system did not exist) so there is no such thing as ‘Sharia law’. There is only Shariah (which means ‘the way’). Islam did not define any fixed notion of state, and hence the matter is left to the people to adopt within Islamic parameters. Here is my recent 10 minute Oxford Union debate speech which explains further:
0:17

American Muslim scholar, Hamza Yusuf co-founder of the Zaytuna College declares that “the whole concept of an ‘Islamic state’ is a fantasy in the minds of the modern Islamists” & confirms that the vast majority of Muslim states in history were “secular” (see above post for what he means by ‘secular’). As I recently argued in my Oxford Union debate - which we won - the reading into Islamic sources of the modern idea of a unitary legal ‘state’ (dawlah) over all of society, is an anachronism. It is the retrospective imposition of the European Westphalian nation-state concept onto traditional Islamic sources. The word ‘state’ (dawlah) is entirely absent from *all* Islamic sources of Shariah. As is the word ‘law’ (Qānūn) and as is the word ‘constitution’ (Distūr). It is thus impossible for the term ‘Islamic State’ to be anything other than a modernist reading. And Shariah is not a ‘law’ (the concept of unitary legal system did not exist) so there is no such thing as ‘Sharia law’. There is only Shariah (which means ‘the way’). Islam did not define any fixed notion of state, and hence the matter is left to the people to adopt within Islamic parameters. Here is my recent 10 minute Oxford Union debate speech which explains further:

أبو عمّار

13,298 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

The idea that "Rwandan youths are asked to put makeup on their nation because they are the voice of their nation" reflects a deeper issue in the way patriotism and civic engagement are taught. Encouraging young people to act as national ambassadors is valuable, but asking them to beautify reality rather than interrogate it critically risks turning them into tools of image management rather than agents of progress. As James Baldwin once said, “I love America more than any other country in the world and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually.”The same applies to Rwanda: true love of country means empowering youth to ask hard questions, not just paint over uncomfortable truths. A politically mature nation does not fear critique from its youth-it values it as part of democratic growth. Teaching young people to "make up" their country denies them the chance to shape it. If the youth are the voice of the nation, then silencing their critical thinking weakens the very voice we claim to amplify. In the end, patriotism without critical inquiry is just performance. And asking youth to perform instead of participate is not nation-building, it’s branding. 📹 Capt. Arielle Ingabire Sekamana (Respect and appreciation for her dedicated service to the nation 👏🏿) #KizitoMihigo-Vivelepardon Meghan Anna Mars John B. Simbaburanga Ausares* ➤ Louise UWACU Sheila kamuzinzi 🇷🇼🇸🇬 Seth ~ 🇰🇪🇰🇪
0:18

The idea that "Rwandan youths are asked to put makeup on their nation because they are the voice of their nation" reflects a deeper issue in the way patriotism and civic engagement are taught. Encouraging young people to act as national ambassadors is valuable, but asking them to beautify reality rather than interrogate it critically risks turning them into tools of image management rather than agents of progress. As James Baldwin once said, “I love America more than any other country in the world and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually.”The same applies to Rwanda: true love of country means empowering youth to ask hard questions, not just paint over uncomfortable truths. A politically mature nation does not fear critique from its youth-it values it as part of democratic growth. Teaching young people to "make up" their country denies them the chance to shape it. If the youth are the voice of the nation, then silencing their critical thinking weakens the very voice we claim to amplify. In the end, patriotism without critical inquiry is just performance. And asking youth to perform instead of participate is not nation-building, it’s branding. 📹 Capt. Arielle Ingabire Sekamana (Respect and appreciation for her dedicated service to the nation 👏🏿) #KizitoMihigo-Vivelepardon Meghan Anna Mars John B. Simbaburanga Ausares* ➤ Louise UWACU Sheila kamuzinzi 🇷🇼🇸🇬 Seth ~ 🇰🇪🇰🇪

Nadia MUGUNGA

44,215 Aufrufe • vor 9 Monaten

One Law for All or No Law at All Sharia councils are being normalised as part of “British values.” That lie strikes at the heart of our democracy The Great Betrayal of British Values When a government minister claims that Sharia councils are in line with British values, it is not diplomacy. It is surrender. It shows how far our leaders have drifted from the principles that once held this country together. This is not a debate about faith. It is about power, justice, and the quiet collapse of equality under the law. For years, politicians have turned British values into a slogan. Something printed on leaflets, recited in schools, or used in speeches to fill the silence. But when those values are tested, when they require courage, the same people who preach them fall silent. Sharia councils have become the latest example of that cowardice, presented as cultural understanding when in truth they represent the abandonment of fairness. Three Ways Sharia Councils Betray British Values The evidence is clear. Sharia councils are not harmless cultural bodies. They are operating systems that contradict the most basic principles of justice. 1. Women Trapped in Unequal Marriages In many cases men can end a marriage with a simple verbal declaration. Women, meanwhile, must seek permission from all-male panels who hold power over their lives. They face pressure from families and communities to comply. The idea that this is voluntary is absurd. It strips women of the rights they would have in a British court and replaces equality with submission. 2. Daughters Denied Equal Inheritance Under British law, a daughter has the same right to inherit as her brother. Under Sharia law, she receives half. That fact alone should end the discussion about compatibility. To claim this system reflects British values is an insult to the very idea of equality. 3. Coercion Hidden Behind Tradition Sharia councils are often described as voluntary mediators. Yet in many communities, refusing to attend one brings shame and isolation. Women are pressured, intimidated, and sometimes ostracised if they choose the British courts instead. This is not freedom. It is social control wrapped in the language of faith. Each of these examples exposes a fundamental conflict. Sharia councils do not uphold British values. They undermine them. What the Government’s Own Reviews Revealed The government knows this problem exists. It has been documented in its own investigations. The Siddiqui Review in 2016, commissioned by the Home Office, exposed widespread discrimination against women and confusion about the legal authority of Sharia councils. It warned that women were being denied their rights and that decisions were being made in conditions of inequality. The Home Affairs Committee Inquiry examined whether these councils were creating a parallel legal system. It found that the lack of oversight allowed inconsistent, unfair, and sometimes unlawful outcomes. The Casey Review on integration reached a similar conclusion. It warned that regressive religious and cultural practices were dividing communities and holding back equality, particularly for women. All three reviews raised the alarm. All three were quietly ignored. A Pattern of Betrayal We have seen this pattern before. When councils and police turned a blind eye to grooming gangs, they said they were protecting community cohesion. When officials downplayed reports of abuse, they said they were promoting tolerance. Every time, the victims were ordinary people. The same cowardice is at work here. Leaders are so afraid of being called intolerant that they allow injustice to thrive in plain sight. The language changes, the excuses change, but the betrayal stays the same. The Road to a Two-Tier Britain The idea that Sharia councils are compatible with British values is not just false. It is dangerous. It leads to a country where justice depends on who you are and which community you belong to. Once the law becomes negotiable, it stops being the law. When equality is treated as optional, ordinary people lose faith that the system will protect them. That loss of faith corrodes democracy from within. What Must Happen Next There is still time to act, but only if the response matches the scale of the problem. The government cannot continue to pretend that reform alone will solve this. What we face is not a matter of better regulation. It is a question of whether Britain is prepared to defend the principle of one law for all. 1. Every Islamic marriage must be registered under British law. This single act would protect thousands of women who currently discover, often after years of marriage, that they have no legal status, no right to property, and no protection in divorce. Registration brings marriages into the legal system where fairness is enforceable and justice is not dependent on religious interpretation. 2. Sharia councils must no longer be allowed to operate in the shadows. At a minimum, they should be subject to a binding code of practice with full transparency, legal oversight, and public accountability. Their decisions should have no standing in British law, and no council should ever be allowed to present itself as a court. 3. We must go further. There is now a compelling argument for the outright closure of Sharia councils. For years, politicians have treated them as an inevitable feature of multicultural Britain. Yet their existence has created a parallel system of justice that undermines equality and fragments the social fabric. A country cannot claim to defend equality under the law while simultaneously licensing institutions that deny it. The two ideas cannot coexist. The choice is simple. Either we have one legal system that protects everyone equally, or we have many systems that protect no one fully. People must be told the truth about their rights. Too many are pressured into believing that Sharia rulings carry legal authority when they do not. Public education, legal outreach, and community engagement are essential to break the cycle of misinformation and coercion. This is not about opposing faith. It is about protecting fairness. No religion should sit above the law. No citizen should live under a different standard of justice because of their background or beliefs. The law must serve every citizen equally, or it serves no one at all. The Line That Cannot Be Crossed British values are not negotiable. They are not slogans or soundbites. They are the foundation of a free society built on equality before the law. To say that Sharia councils reflect those values is to empty them of all meaning. It betrays the women silenced in community meetings, the citizens abandoned by institutions, and the principle of justice itself. If our leaders are too frightened to defend the rule of law, then the duty falls to ordinary people to speak up. Because once we accept that different groups can live under different laws, we will have given up the very idea of Britain as a single nation. When the law ceases to protect everyone equally, everything that follows is built on sand. _________ If my words have ever helped you make sense of a broken system, if they’ve ever made you feel seen, heard, or hopeful, please don’t scroll past. 🔴 Support my work. This fight is far from over. 👉 There are no paywalls to access any of my work. I share all of my content for free. As well as sharing my thoughts on social media and running online workshops, each month, I travel across the country to meet with ordinary people. I charge no speaker fees. Nor do I claim a single penny in expenses. All I ask in return, for that those that can afford to do so, to support me from just £3/month or £30/year. That’s 75p a week. Pennies to most - everything to help keep me going. 🔴 Prefer a one-off contribution? 👉 👉 This is the fight. This is the moment. There will not be another. - Raja 🙏
0:19

One Law for All or No Law at All Sharia councils are being normalised as part of “British values.” That lie strikes at the heart of our democracy The Great Betrayal of British Values When a government minister claims that Sharia councils are in line with British values, it is not diplomacy. It is surrender. It shows how far our leaders have drifted from the principles that once held this country together. This is not a debate about faith. It is about power, justice, and the quiet collapse of equality under the law. For years, politicians have turned British values into a slogan. Something printed on leaflets, recited in schools, or used in speeches to fill the silence. But when those values are tested, when they require courage, the same people who preach them fall silent. Sharia councils have become the latest example of that cowardice, presented as cultural understanding when in truth they represent the abandonment of fairness. Three Ways Sharia Councils Betray British Values The evidence is clear. Sharia councils are not harmless cultural bodies. They are operating systems that contradict the most basic principles of justice. 1. Women Trapped in Unequal Marriages In many cases men can end a marriage with a simple verbal declaration. Women, meanwhile, must seek permission from all-male panels who hold power over their lives. They face pressure from families and communities to comply. The idea that this is voluntary is absurd. It strips women of the rights they would have in a British court and replaces equality with submission. 2. Daughters Denied Equal Inheritance Under British law, a daughter has the same right to inherit as her brother. Under Sharia law, she receives half. That fact alone should end the discussion about compatibility. To claim this system reflects British values is an insult to the very idea of equality. 3. Coercion Hidden Behind Tradition Sharia councils are often described as voluntary mediators. Yet in many communities, refusing to attend one brings shame and isolation. Women are pressured, intimidated, and sometimes ostracised if they choose the British courts instead. This is not freedom. It is social control wrapped in the language of faith. Each of these examples exposes a fundamental conflict. Sharia councils do not uphold British values. They undermine them. What the Government’s Own Reviews Revealed The government knows this problem exists. It has been documented in its own investigations. The Siddiqui Review in 2016, commissioned by the Home Office, exposed widespread discrimination against women and confusion about the legal authority of Sharia councils. It warned that women were being denied their rights and that decisions were being made in conditions of inequality. The Home Affairs Committee Inquiry examined whether these councils were creating a parallel legal system. It found that the lack of oversight allowed inconsistent, unfair, and sometimes unlawful outcomes. The Casey Review on integration reached a similar conclusion. It warned that regressive religious and cultural practices were dividing communities and holding back equality, particularly for women. All three reviews raised the alarm. All three were quietly ignored. A Pattern of Betrayal We have seen this pattern before. When councils and police turned a blind eye to grooming gangs, they said they were protecting community cohesion. When officials downplayed reports of abuse, they said they were promoting tolerance. Every time, the victims were ordinary people. The same cowardice is at work here. Leaders are so afraid of being called intolerant that they allow injustice to thrive in plain sight. The language changes, the excuses change, but the betrayal stays the same. The Road to a Two-Tier Britain The idea that Sharia councils are compatible with British values is not just false. It is dangerous. It leads to a country where justice depends on who you are and which community you belong to. Once the law becomes negotiable, it stops being the law. When equality is treated as optional, ordinary people lose faith that the system will protect them. That loss of faith corrodes democracy from within. What Must Happen Next There is still time to act, but only if the response matches the scale of the problem. The government cannot continue to pretend that reform alone will solve this. What we face is not a matter of better regulation. It is a question of whether Britain is prepared to defend the principle of one law for all. 1. Every Islamic marriage must be registered under British law. This single act would protect thousands of women who currently discover, often after years of marriage, that they have no legal status, no right to property, and no protection in divorce. Registration brings marriages into the legal system where fairness is enforceable and justice is not dependent on religious interpretation. 2. Sharia councils must no longer be allowed to operate in the shadows. At a minimum, they should be subject to a binding code of practice with full transparency, legal oversight, and public accountability. Their decisions should have no standing in British law, and no council should ever be allowed to present itself as a court. 3. We must go further. There is now a compelling argument for the outright closure of Sharia councils. For years, politicians have treated them as an inevitable feature of multicultural Britain. Yet their existence has created a parallel system of justice that undermines equality and fragments the social fabric. A country cannot claim to defend equality under the law while simultaneously licensing institutions that deny it. The two ideas cannot coexist. The choice is simple. Either we have one legal system that protects everyone equally, or we have many systems that protect no one fully. People must be told the truth about their rights. Too many are pressured into believing that Sharia rulings carry legal authority when they do not. Public education, legal outreach, and community engagement are essential to break the cycle of misinformation and coercion. This is not about opposing faith. It is about protecting fairness. No religion should sit above the law. No citizen should live under a different standard of justice because of their background or beliefs. The law must serve every citizen equally, or it serves no one at all. The Line That Cannot Be Crossed British values are not negotiable. They are not slogans or soundbites. They are the foundation of a free society built on equality before the law. To say that Sharia councils reflect those values is to empty them of all meaning. It betrays the women silenced in community meetings, the citizens abandoned by institutions, and the principle of justice itself. If our leaders are too frightened to defend the rule of law, then the duty falls to ordinary people to speak up. Because once we accept that different groups can live under different laws, we will have given up the very idea of Britain as a single nation. When the law ceases to protect everyone equally, everything that follows is built on sand. _________ If my words have ever helped you make sense of a broken system, if they’ve ever made you feel seen, heard, or hopeful, please don’t scroll past. 🔴 Support my work. This fight is far from over. 👉 There are no paywalls to access any of my work. I share all of my content for free. As well as sharing my thoughts on social media and running online workshops, each month, I travel across the country to meet with ordinary people. I charge no speaker fees. Nor do I claim a single penny in expenses. All I ask in return, for that those that can afford to do so, to support me from just £3/month or £30/year. That’s 75p a week. Pennies to most - everything to help keep me going. 🔴 Prefer a one-off contribution? 👉 👉 This is the fight. This is the moment. There will not be another. - Raja 🙏

Raja Miah

16,907 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

🚨 Burkina Faso 🇧🇫- No place for religious bigotry! You see this man running? It’s an Imam who went on live to condemn the government’s draft law that wants to ban people erecting mosques and churches in public administration. I listened to his criticism and honestly, I was shocked and disgusted. Can you imagine this old man openly insulted the government and painted them as the devil if they want to prevent people from praying on public squares? Now, let me make this clear. The government never said that people cannot pray. The have adopted a bill aimed at prohibiting the construction and establishment of places of worship (mosques, churches) within the premises of public services. However, the practice of individual or collective prayer in public administrative spaces is not prohibited. So, I am surprised that this Iman who has a Doctorate couldn’t understand something as simple as this. But no, he went on his pulpit and started spewing nonsense. So, the local police who fights religious intolerance and extremism went to arrest him for questioning and he took off 😄. Some of his fellow muslims took to the streets to ask for his release and it became an open confrontation with the police. You see, this is what I have been saying for donkey years that people need to separate religion from the State. These are two different issues. But it seems like when it comes to religion, many Africans are so alienated that they are blinded by their religious zealotry. I even saw the weak-minded ones say that they thought that Capitaine Ibrahim TRAORÉ was going to be the President who would uplift Islam ☪️ and root for its propagation. I was like what the hell is wrong with these people? Anyway, let this be a reminder to every Burkinabè like myself that Burkina Faso 🇧🇫 is a secular country. So, don’t you ever bring your religious bigotry into the State affairs hoping you will have your way. No! Believe in whomever you wanna believe, but keep your religion out of the State. I am against Church/Religion and State.
0:15

🚨 Burkina Faso 🇧🇫- No place for religious bigotry! You see this man running? It’s an Imam who went on live to condemn the government’s draft law that wants to ban people erecting mosques and churches in public administration. I listened to his criticism and honestly, I was shocked and disgusted. Can you imagine this old man openly insulted the government and painted them as the devil if they want to prevent people from praying on public squares? Now, let me make this clear. The government never said that people cannot pray. The have adopted a bill aimed at prohibiting the construction and establishment of places of worship (mosques, churches) within the premises of public services. However, the practice of individual or collective prayer in public administrative spaces is not prohibited. So, I am surprised that this Iman who has a Doctorate couldn’t understand something as simple as this. But no, he went on his pulpit and started spewing nonsense. So, the local police who fights religious intolerance and extremism went to arrest him for questioning and he took off 😄. Some of his fellow muslims took to the streets to ask for his release and it became an open confrontation with the police. You see, this is what I have been saying for donkey years that people need to separate religion from the State. These are two different issues. But it seems like when it comes to religion, many Africans are so alienated that they are blinded by their religious zealotry. I even saw the weak-minded ones say that they thought that Capitaine Ibrahim TRAORÉ was going to be the President who would uplift Islam ☪️ and root for its propagation. I was like what the hell is wrong with these people? Anyway, let this be a reminder to every Burkinabè like myself that Burkina Faso 🇧🇫 is a secular country. So, don’t you ever bring your religious bigotry into the State affairs hoping you will have your way. No! Believe in whomever you wanna believe, but keep your religion out of the State. I am against Church/Religion and State.

Sy Marcus Herve Traore

30,147 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Gary Neville just couldn’t help himself. Sitting there itching to criticise the US and Trump over the FIFA decision on Folarin Balogun’s one-game ban, he lands a cheap dig at the host nation: “I’d be absolutely raging if I was Belgium… Are we surprised? No. Not with this lot.” “This lot”? That’s not just criticising FIFA. By lumping the hosts as “this lot”, he’s lazily painting the entire country and its team with the same brush over a governing body decision. This is the very nation that welcomed him to America as a pundit to cover the tournament. Disrespectful doesn’t even cover it. And the hypocrisy is glaring. The exact same mechanism (FIFA suspending part of a red-card ban under Article 27) was used for Cristiano Ronaldo after his elbow in World Cup qualifying. He served one match and the rest was put on probation so he could play the tournament. Where was Neville’s outrage then? 🦗 Same rule. Same “special treatment”, but no outrage from Neville. 🤔
0:19

Gary Neville just couldn’t help himself. Sitting there itching to criticise the US and Trump over the FIFA decision on Folarin Balogun’s one-game ban, he lands a cheap dig at the host nation: “I’d be absolutely raging if I was Belgium… Are we surprised? No. Not with this lot.” “This lot”? That’s not just criticising FIFA. By lumping the hosts as “this lot”, he’s lazily painting the entire country and its team with the same brush over a governing body decision. This is the very nation that welcomed him to America as a pundit to cover the tournament. Disrespectful doesn’t even cover it. And the hypocrisy is glaring. The exact same mechanism (FIFA suspending part of a red-card ban under Article 27) was used for Cristiano Ronaldo after his elbow in World Cup qualifying. He served one match and the rest was put on probation so he could play the tournament. Where was Neville’s outrage then? 🦗 Same rule. Same “special treatment”, but no outrage from Neville. 🤔

J Stewart

66,008 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

If Rwanda is truly governed by its Constitution, then someone should explain why a cabinet minister Dr. Jean Damascene BIZIMANA at Youth Forum felt the need to begin by saying: “Respected First Lady, I thank you for giving me this opportunity in this Youth Forum.” Under Rwandan law, ministers hold constitutional office and exercise authority delegated through state institutions. The First Lady, however, holds no constitutional position, no executive mandate, and no legal authority over government ministers. When ministers speak as if permission flows from unelected family members, it raises an obvious question: who is actually exercising influence in Rwanda❓ This is why we describe Paul Kagame’s system as a family enterprise masquerading as a republic. The Constitution speaks of institutions, accountability, and public office. Reality too often appears to revolve around one family whose influence extends far beyond any role recognized by law. A republic is supposed to be governed by institutions, not by family prestige. When ministers publicly defer to individuals who hold no constitutional office, it becomes harder to distinguish state authority from family power. #MillenZMovementRw✊
0:11

If Rwanda is truly governed by its Constitution, then someone should explain why a cabinet minister Dr. Jean Damascene BIZIMANA at Youth Forum felt the need to begin by saying: “Respected First Lady, I thank you for giving me this opportunity in this Youth Forum.” Under Rwandan law, ministers hold constitutional office and exercise authority delegated through state institutions. The First Lady, however, holds no constitutional position, no executive mandate, and no legal authority over government ministers. When ministers speak as if permission flows from unelected family members, it raises an obvious question: who is actually exercising influence in Rwanda❓ This is why we describe Paul Kagame’s system as a family enterprise masquerading as a republic. The Constitution speaks of institutions, accountability, and public office. Reality too often appears to revolve around one family whose influence extends far beyond any role recognized by law. A republic is supposed to be governed by institutions, not by family prestige. When ministers publicly defer to individuals who hold no constitutional office, it becomes harder to distinguish state authority from family power. #MillenZMovementRw✊

U.Sheila C kamuzinzi 🇷🇼🇸🇬

15,973 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten