Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

The corporate ladder doesn't exist anymore. It's structurally GONE. The bottom rungs have been removed. And the data proves it beyond any debate: Employment for software developers aged 22 to 25 has fallen nearly 20% since late 2022. The exact moment generative AI went mainstream. Developers aged 30 and... older at the SAME companies? Employment grew 6 to 12%. Same companies. Same industry. Same economy. Young workers got cut. Senior workers got raises. This is literally a restructuring of who gets to have a career. Entry-level jobs across AI-exposed fields collapsed: - Software postings dropped from 43% entry-level to 28% - Data roles dropped from 35% to 22% - Consulting dropped from 41% to 26% Total entry-level postings in the US down 35% since January 2023. Bloomberg reported this week that 43% of US graduates aged 22 to 27 are now underemployed. Working jobs that don't require the degree they just spent four years and six figures earning. Meanwhile 60% of entry-level jobs now require 3+ years of experience. Entry-level. Three years experience required. You need the job to get the experience. You need the experience to get the job. The loop is closed. So here's what you need to understand: Every generation before this one had a deal. An unspoken contract between companies and young workers. You start at the bottom. You answer phones. You build spreadsheets. You write the first draft that a senior person edits. You sit in meetings you don't understand yet. You learn by doing the work nobody else wants to do. That was the training ground. The apprenticeship that turned a 22yo with a degree into a 28yo who could actually run something. But AI automated that entire layer: First drafts? ChatGPT. Data entry? Automated. Basic code? Copilot. Customer support tier 1? Agents. Report generation? Gone. Research summaries? Gone. Junior analyst work? Gone. The tasks that used to TEACH young people how to become senior people no longer exist as jobs. Companies aren't replacing those roles with training programs. They're just not hiring juniors at all. SignalFire found a 50% decline in new hires with less than one year of post-graduate experience at major tech companies between 2019 and 2024. The Dallas Fed confirmed it: Young people aren't getting fired... They're never getting HIRED in the first place. The door closed before they could walk through it. Now you have an economy with two classes: Senior workers who learned their skills BEFORE AI. They carry institutional knowledge, judgment, and context no model can replicate. Wages rising. Jobs secure. AI makes them MORE valuable. Young workers who graduated INTO the AI era. Their textbook knowledge is exactly what AI replicates best. Wages stagnant. Jobs disappearing. Redundant before they've had a chance to become anything. Walmart's CEO started by unloading trucks. HP's CEO started in a call center. GM's CEO started on the assembly line at 18. Those paths are gone. Not because companies are evil - but because the WORK those paths were built on no longer requires a human. And here's the scary part to me: If nobody trains the next generation, there IS no next generation. The 28yo manager you want to hire in 2030 is the 22yo who can't get an entry-level job today. The senior talent you're hoarding will retire. Nobody will be behind them. Because nobody invested in building them. So every company celebrating "doing more with less" is quietly destroying the pipeline of people who would have become their future leaders. The ladder isn't broken. It's been REMOVED. And nobody's building a new one.show more

Ricardo

44,974 subscribers

11,900 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

A former Goldman Sachs executive just said something on camera that should terrify every lawyer, doctor, and analyst on the planet. His name is Raoul Pal and he used to move billions on Wall Street. He was asked one question: "How disruptive will AI be?" He said it is the single greatest innovation in human history. Greater than the internet or the electricity. The only thing he compared it to was the splitting of the atom. But here is the part nobody is ready for. He said knowledge is now worth zero. Think about that for a second. Why do lawyers charge $800 an hour? Scarcity of knowledge. Why do consultants bill Fortune 500 companies millions? Scarcity of knowledge. Why did your parents tell you to get a degree? Scarcity of knowledge. AI just destroyed that entire model. A teenager with ChatGPT can now draft legal contracts, build financial models, write code and analyze medical scans. No degree, decade of experience and no six figure student debt. And the numbers already prove it. Employment for workers under 25 in AI-exposed jobs has dropped 13%. Wall Street banks are planning to cut 200,000 jobs. 30% of U.S. companies have already replaced workers with AI. 18 million entry level American jobs could disappear entirely. But here is the part that should keep you up at night. The junior roles where people learn, make mistakes, and develop real judgment are being automated first. Which means the experience that AI cannot replace is the exact experience young workers can no longer get. Pal says humanity now faces a binary choice. Merge with the machines or reject them. There is no middle ground and this is not about robots in factories. This is about the collapse of the entire knowledge economy.

A former Goldman Sachs executive just said something on camera that should terrify every lawyer, doctor, and analyst on the planet. His name is Raoul Pal and he used to move billions on Wall Street. He was asked one question: "How disruptive will AI be?" He said it is the single greatest innovation in human history. Greater than the internet or the electricity. The only thing he compared it to was the splitting of the atom. But here is the part nobody is ready for. He said knowledge is now worth zero. Think about that for a second. Why do lawyers charge $800 an hour? Scarcity of knowledge. Why do consultants bill Fortune 500 companies millions? Scarcity of knowledge. Why did your parents tell you to get a degree? Scarcity of knowledge. AI just destroyed that entire model. A teenager with ChatGPT can now draft legal contracts, build financial models, write code and analyze medical scans. No degree, decade of experience and no six figure student debt. And the numbers already prove it. Employment for workers under 25 in AI-exposed jobs has dropped 13%. Wall Street banks are planning to cut 200,000 jobs. 30% of U.S. companies have already replaced workers with AI. 18 million entry level American jobs could disappear entirely. But here is the part that should keep you up at night. The junior roles where people learn, make mistakes, and develop real judgment are being automated first. Which means the experience that AI cannot replace is the exact experience young workers can no longer get. Pal says humanity now faces a binary choice. Merge with the machines or reject them. There is no middle ground and this is not about robots in factories. This is about the collapse of the entire knowledge economy.

Milk Road AI

414,422 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Dario Amodei just warned about the next economic crisis on live television. The timeline is 1 to 5 years. Amodei: “We may indeed have a serious employment crisis on our hands as the pipeline for this early-stage white-collar work starts to contract and dry up.” Not factory workers. Not truck drivers. Lawyers. Consultants. Finance professionals. The entry-level jobs that millions of college graduates have used as the first rung of the middle class for decades. Amodei: “AI is at the level of a smart college student and reaching beyond that.” The skills those entry-level jobs require are exactly what AI does best. Summarizing documents. Building financial models. Drafting reports. Synthesizing research. The pipeline doesn’t just shrink. It dries up. And if the entry-level pipeline disappears, there is no path to senior leadership for the next generation. The ladder doesn’t get harder to climb. It gets removed. But here is what makes this different from every other automation warning. Amodei: “We can’t stop the AI bus. Even if all six companies stopped, then China would beat us. I think that’s a big and important threat.” This isn’t a choice between disruption and stability. It’s a choice between disrupting the economy ourselves or ceding that disruption to a geopolitical adversary who will do it without any of the safeguards. There is no pause button. There is no responsible opt-out. So Amodei said something no tech CEO has ever said publicly before. Amodei: “We may want government to find a way to level the economic playing field. Taxing AI companies like us.” The man building the technology that will eliminate millions of jobs is asking the government to tax him for doing it. That isn’t cognitive dissonance. That’s the clearest possible signal that the people building it understand what’s actually coming. The abundance is coming. The disruption arrives first. And the architects of that disruption are already asking who pays for the wreckage.

Dario Amodei just warned about the next economic crisis on live television. The timeline is 1 to 5 years. Amodei: “We may indeed have a serious employment crisis on our hands as the pipeline for this early-stage white-collar work starts to contract and dry up.” Not factory workers. Not truck drivers. Lawyers. Consultants. Finance professionals. The entry-level jobs that millions of college graduates have used as the first rung of the middle class for decades. Amodei: “AI is at the level of a smart college student and reaching beyond that.” The skills those entry-level jobs require are exactly what AI does best. Summarizing documents. Building financial models. Drafting reports. Synthesizing research. The pipeline doesn’t just shrink. It dries up. And if the entry-level pipeline disappears, there is no path to senior leadership for the next generation. The ladder doesn’t get harder to climb. It gets removed. But here is what makes this different from every other automation warning. Amodei: “We can’t stop the AI bus. Even if all six companies stopped, then China would beat us. I think that’s a big and important threat.” This isn’t a choice between disruption and stability. It’s a choice between disrupting the economy ourselves or ceding that disruption to a geopolitical adversary who will do it without any of the safeguards. There is no pause button. There is no responsible opt-out. So Amodei said something no tech CEO has ever said publicly before. Amodei: “We may want government to find a way to level the economic playing field. Taxing AI companies like us.” The man building the technology that will eliminate millions of jobs is asking the government to tax him for doing it. That isn’t cognitive dissonance. That’s the clearest possible signal that the people building it understand what’s actually coming. The abundance is coming. The disruption arrives first. And the architects of that disruption are already asking who pays for the wreckage.

Dustin

105,277 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

44% of Gen Z employees are secretly destroying their company's AI systems from the inside. They're literally poisoning the data, faking the results, and making AI look like it doesn't work. This new survey of 2,400 workers by Writer and Workplace Intelligence is genuinely unbelievable... 29% of ALL employees admit to actively sabotaging their company's AI strategy. Among Gen Z workers? 44%. Nearly HALF. What they're doing: - Feeding proprietary company data into public AI tools on purpose - Tampering with performance reviews to make AI look like it's underperforming - Deliberately generating garbage output so leadership thinks the technology is broken - Refusing training - Refusing to log in - Some are even manipulating analytics dashboards to HIDE any productivity gains AI actually delivers They have a name for it too: FOBO. Fear Of Becoming Obsolete. And it honestly makes complete sense when you look at what their CEOs are telling them. Palantir's CEO stood on a stage at Davos in January and said "AI will destroy humanities jobs." Direct quote. Then added "You're effed." Anthropic's CEO said AI could eliminate HALF of all entry-level white-collar jobs. Microsoft's AI chief said ALL white-collar work could be automated within 18 months. These aren't random Twitter predictions. These are the CEOs of the companies BUILDING the AI. Telling the workforce directly that they're about to be replaced. Then those same companies turn around and say "please adopt this tool that's going to take your job." And they're genuinely confused when employees fight back. The data gets even worse though: 60% of executives say they're considering FIRING employees who refuse to adopt AI. 77% say they'll block promotions for anyone who resists. Accenture is literally monitoring weekly AI login data to decide who gets promoted. Meanwhile the job market for the people being told to "adapt or die" looks like this: - Entry-level software postings dropped from 43% to 28% since 2023 - 43% of US graduates aged 22 to 27 are underemployed - 60% of entry-level jobs now require 3+ years of experience - 80,000 tech workers have been laid off in 2026 alone AI was the LEADING cause of job cuts in March 2026 for the first time in recorded history. So the math is simple: CEOs are telling workers AI will replace them. Then demanding they use it. Then threatening to fire them if they don't. All while the job market outside is collapsing. And they wonder why 44% of Gen Z is burning it from the inside. But here's the part that surprised me the most: 75% of the executives in the same survey admitted their company's AI strategy is "more for show than a meaningful guide to outcomes." 3 out of 4 companies don't even HAVE a real AI strategy. They're forcing adoption of tools they don't understand. For strategies they haven't built. While threatening the livelihoods of people who see through the entire charade. 54% of executives also said AI is "tearing their company apart." Well... no shit. This is the first organized sabotage campaign against a technology in modern corporate history. The last time workers systematically destroyed the machines threatening their jobs was the Luddite movement in 1811. Factory workers smashing textile looms across England. History books treated them like idiots. Turns out they were 200 years early. The only difference is that today's sabotage is invisible. Corrupted data, faked metrics, and an entire generation quietly making sure the robots don't work. And the craziest part is that the executives threatening to fire them are the same ones who can't tell the AI is being sabotaged. Because they don't understand the technology either.

44% of Gen Z employees are secretly destroying their company's AI systems from the inside. They're literally poisoning the data, faking the results, and making AI look like it doesn't work. This new survey of 2,400 workers by Writer and Workplace Intelligence is genuinely unbelievable... 29% of ALL employees admit to actively sabotaging their company's AI strategy. Among Gen Z workers? 44%. Nearly HALF. What they're doing: - Feeding proprietary company data into public AI tools on purpose - Tampering with performance reviews to make AI look like it's underperforming - Deliberately generating garbage output so leadership thinks the technology is broken - Refusing training - Refusing to log in - Some are even manipulating analytics dashboards to HIDE any productivity gains AI actually delivers They have a name for it too: FOBO. Fear Of Becoming Obsolete. And it honestly makes complete sense when you look at what their CEOs are telling them. Palantir's CEO stood on a stage at Davos in January and said "AI will destroy humanities jobs." Direct quote. Then added "You're effed." Anthropic's CEO said AI could eliminate HALF of all entry-level white-collar jobs. Microsoft's AI chief said ALL white-collar work could be automated within 18 months. These aren't random Twitter predictions. These are the CEOs of the companies BUILDING the AI. Telling the workforce directly that they're about to be replaced. Then those same companies turn around and say "please adopt this tool that's going to take your job." And they're genuinely confused when employees fight back. The data gets even worse though: 60% of executives say they're considering FIRING employees who refuse to adopt AI. 77% say they'll block promotions for anyone who resists. Accenture is literally monitoring weekly AI login data to decide who gets promoted. Meanwhile the job market for the people being told to "adapt or die" looks like this: - Entry-level software postings dropped from 43% to 28% since 2023 - 43% of US graduates aged 22 to 27 are underemployed - 60% of entry-level jobs now require 3+ years of experience - 80,000 tech workers have been laid off in 2026 alone AI was the LEADING cause of job cuts in March 2026 for the first time in recorded history. So the math is simple: CEOs are telling workers AI will replace them. Then demanding they use it. Then threatening to fire them if they don't. All while the job market outside is collapsing. And they wonder why 44% of Gen Z is burning it from the inside. But here's the part that surprised me the most: 75% of the executives in the same survey admitted their company's AI strategy is "more for show than a meaningful guide to outcomes." 3 out of 4 companies don't even HAVE a real AI strategy. They're forcing adoption of tools they don't understand. For strategies they haven't built. While threatening the livelihoods of people who see through the entire charade. 54% of executives also said AI is "tearing their company apart." Well... no shit. This is the first organized sabotage campaign against a technology in modern corporate history. The last time workers systematically destroyed the machines threatening their jobs was the Luddite movement in 1811. Factory workers smashing textile looms across England. History books treated them like idiots. Turns out they were 200 years early. The only difference is that today's sabotage is invisible. Corrupted data, faked metrics, and an entire generation quietly making sure the robots don't work. And the craziest part is that the executives threatening to fire them are the same ones who can't tell the AI is being sabotaged. Because they don't understand the technology either.

Ricardo

282,223 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Intercom CEO Eoghan McCabe: "You don't have a choice. AI is going to disrupt you in the most aggressive, violent ways. If you're not in it, you're about to get kicked out of all of it. My strongest advice is that you need to bring in the young talent. AI is kind of a young person's game. You're competing with young companies that are in part AI, run by kids in their twenties, literally working 12 hours a day, literally 365 days a year. These younger companies know how to use AI in ways that the older companies don't. Companies of our generation, people in most organizations, particularly non-technical organizations, they're not using any AI. Maybe they're starting to use ChatGPT to write a job description. But they're not doing it by default."

Intercom CEO Eoghan McCabe: "You don't have a choice. AI is going to disrupt you in the most aggressive, violent ways. If you're not in it, you're about to get kicked out of all of it. My strongest advice is that you need to bring in the young talent. AI is kind of a young person's game. You're competing with young companies that are in part AI, run by kids in their twenties, literally working 12 hours a day, literally 365 days a year. These younger companies know how to use AI in ways that the older companies don't. Companies of our generation, people in most organizations, particularly non-technical organizations, they're not using any AI. Maybe they're starting to use ChatGPT to write a job description. But they're not doing it by default."

Lenny Rachitsky

73,870 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Alex Karp at Davos cuts through the AI jobs debate with something most people aren't prepared to hear. "One of the unfortunate things of the narrative in the west is it will destroy humanity's jobs — like you went to an elite school and you studied philosophy. Use myself as an example. That one is going to be hard to market." Karp points to workers building batteries in America, doing the same jobs as Japanese engineers, who went to high school rather than university. In his view, those are the people the AI economy will increasingly reward. "Those jobs are going to become more valuable. There will be more than enough jobs for the citizens of your nation, especially those with vocational training." When pushed on whether this means fewer white collar jobs, he said yes. But his real point runs deeper than that. He brings up a former police officer who attended a junior college and now manages complex targeting operations for the U.S. Army at a global level. "That person actually is irreplaceable. And I think in the past, the way we tested for aptitude would not have fully exposed how irreplaceable that person's talents are." The old credentialing system was built to filter for degrees, not capability. AI is now exposing that gap. The people who will thrive are those who can be quickly upskilled, apply practical judgment, and work effectively alongside advanced systems. A philosophy graduate from a top university may still struggle to land their first role, while a vocational technician who adapts and grows with the technology becomes the person no company wants to lose. AI is accelerating that shift, and a university degree is no longer the deciding factor in who the economy values.

Alex Karp at Davos cuts through the AI jobs debate with something most people aren't prepared to hear. "One of the unfortunate things of the narrative in the west is it will destroy humanity's jobs — like you went to an elite school and you studied philosophy. Use myself as an example. That one is going to be hard to market." Karp points to workers building batteries in America, doing the same jobs as Japanese engineers, who went to high school rather than university. In his view, those are the people the AI economy will increasingly reward. "Those jobs are going to become more valuable. There will be more than enough jobs for the citizens of your nation, especially those with vocational training." When pushed on whether this means fewer white collar jobs, he said yes. But his real point runs deeper than that. He brings up a former police officer who attended a junior college and now manages complex targeting operations for the U.S. Army at a global level. "That person actually is irreplaceable. And I think in the past, the way we tested for aptitude would not have fully exposed how irreplaceable that person's talents are." The old credentialing system was built to filter for degrees, not capability. AI is now exposing that gap. The people who will thrive are those who can be quickly upskilled, apply practical judgment, and work effectively alongside advanced systems. A philosophy graduate from a top university may still struggle to land their first role, while a vocational technician who adapts and grows with the technology becomes the person no company wants to lose. AI is accelerating that shift, and a university degree is no longer the deciding factor in who the economy values.

Big Brain AI

39,113 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

This is a clear indicator of how hard the job market is in America right now It is statistically harder to get a job at Dutch Bros than it is to get into Harvard - Over 780,000 people applied for Dutch Bros jobs last year, they accepted just 2.4% of applicants - Harvard's acceptance rate was 4.2% Entry-level hiring is getting overwhelmed with competition due to displacement White-collar workers are losing their jobs, so now a 17 year old high school student is competing with people who have college degrees and work experience for entry-level jobs AI is a contributing factor

This is a clear indicator of how hard the job market is in America right now It is statistically harder to get a job at Dutch Bros than it is to get into Harvard - Over 780,000 people applied for Dutch Bros jobs last year, they accepted just 2.4% of applicants - Harvard's acceptance rate was 4.2% Entry-level hiring is getting overwhelmed with competition due to displacement White-collar workers are losing their jobs, so now a 17 year old high school student is competing with people who have college degrees and work experience for entry-level jobs AI is a contributing factor

Wall Street Apes

120,411 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Dario Amodei, the CEO of Anthropic, went on CNN and put a number on the thing most AI CEOs will not say out loud: Half of all entry-level white-collar jobs gone. Unemployment at 10 to 20%. Inside 1 to 5 years. "The most salient feature of the technology, and what is driving all of this, is how fast the technology is getting better." "A couple of years ago, you could say that AI models were maybe as good as a smart high school student. I would say that now they're as good as a smart college student, and sort of reaching past that." "I really worry, particularly at the entry level, that the AI models are very much at the center of what an entry level human worker would do." "What is striking to me about this AI boom is that it's bigger and it's broader and it's moving faster than anything has before." "People will adapt, but they may not adapt fast enough. And so there may be an adjustment period." The tell: this is not a critic outside the industry. It is the man building the models saying the quiet part on camera -- because he thinks the people whose jobs are on the line adapt slower than the models improve. High school to college in two years was the warm-up. The entry level is where it lands first.

Dario Amodei, the CEO of Anthropic, went on CNN and put a number on the thing most AI CEOs will not say out loud: Half of all entry-level white-collar jobs gone. Unemployment at 10 to 20%. Inside 1 to 5 years. "The most salient feature of the technology, and what is driving all of this, is how fast the technology is getting better." "A couple of years ago, you could say that AI models were maybe as good as a smart high school student. I would say that now they're as good as a smart college student, and sort of reaching past that." "I really worry, particularly at the entry level, that the AI models are very much at the center of what an entry level human worker would do." "What is striking to me about this AI boom is that it's bigger and it's broader and it's moving faster than anything has before." "People will adapt, but they may not adapt fast enough. And so there may be an adjustment period." The tell: this is not a critic outside the industry. It is the man building the models saying the quiet part on camera -- because he thinks the people whose jobs are on the line adapt slower than the models improve. High school to college in two years was the warm-up. The entry level is where it lands first.

Karl Mehta

341,287 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Karen Hao just revealed that laid-off workers are being hired to train AI on the exact job they were fired from. A marketer gets laid off. They take a data annotation gig. They teach the model how to do marketing. The model learns. The next layoffs come. The cycle repeats. Here's the story: Hao interviewed 300+ people for her book Empire of AI. Data annotation is now one of the fastest-growing categories on LinkedIn. The people doing it are not who you'd expect: - PhD and law school graduates - Doctors who can't find clinical work - Award-winning Hollywood directors annotating in secret to feed their kids Hao says these jobs are "way worse than the jobs that were there." They "break the career ladder" from the middle out. A New York Magazine investigation followed one woman in the system. She said the work was "mechanizing my life, atomizing my work, devaluing my expertise." She said she had "become a monster." The job that replaces your job is teaching the machine to replace the next person. Anthropic's own data shows a 40% drop in entry-level hiring in the roles AI is targeting. Hao calls these companies "empires of AI." Almost nobody is talking about who's absorbing the fallout. — Karen Hao (Karen Hao), author of Empire of AI, on The Diary of a CEO (Steven Bartlett) podcast PS. This account exists to share the underreported stories the tech industry would rather you scroll past. Follow if that interests you — you won't want to miss what's scheduled next.

Karen Hao just revealed that laid-off workers are being hired to train AI on the exact job they were fired from. A marketer gets laid off. They take a data annotation gig. They teach the model how to do marketing. The model learns. The next layoffs come. The cycle repeats. Here's the story: Hao interviewed 300+ people for her book Empire of AI. Data annotation is now one of the fastest-growing categories on LinkedIn. The people doing it are not who you'd expect: - PhD and law school graduates - Doctors who can't find clinical work - Award-winning Hollywood directors annotating in secret to feed their kids Hao says these jobs are "way worse than the jobs that were there." They "break the career ladder" from the middle out. A New York Magazine investigation followed one woman in the system. She said the work was "mechanizing my life, atomizing my work, devaluing my expertise." She said she had "become a monster." The job that replaces your job is teaching the machine to replace the next person. Anthropic's own data shows a 40% drop in entry-level hiring in the roles AI is targeting. Hao calls these companies "empires of AI." Almost nobody is talking about who's absorbing the fallout. — Karen Hao (Karen Hao), author of Empire of AI, on The Diary of a CEO (Steven Bartlett) podcast PS. This account exists to share the underreported stories the tech industry would rather you scroll past. Follow if that interests you — you won't want to miss what's scheduled next.

GeniusThinking

26,933 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Mark Cuban said what every CEO in America needs to hear. "There are only two types of companies in this world, those who are great at AI, and everybody else. If you don't know AI, you are going to fail. Period, end of story." Mark Cuban didn't stop there. "Whether you are an employee, you're going to have to understand how AI impacts your job and how you can use it to be better at your job. Same if you're a student. And if you're a CEO, you can't just say, okay, I'm going to get my tech guys to understand it and educate me on it. You have to understand it yourself because it will have significant impact on every single thing that you do. There's no avoiding it." This is coming from someone who built and sold the Dallas Mavericks, who made his first fortune selling a company to Yahoo for $5.7 billion in 1999, and who has spent the last two years going deeper on AI than almost any investor his age. He is describing the Innovator's AI Dilemma, entrepreneurs are right now building AI-native companies designed to displace every major incumbent. If a CEO tears down their company to rebuild it AI native, investors revolt but if they do nothing, AI-native startups eat their market and investors revolt anyway. Either path leads to shareholder lawsuits and there is no comfortable middle. The companies that survive will be the ones where leadership, not just the tech team, genuinely understands what the technology can do. The ones that don't will look back at this moment the same way Blockbuster looks at 2005.

Mark Cuban said what every CEO in America needs to hear. "There are only two types of companies in this world, those who are great at AI, and everybody else. If you don't know AI, you are going to fail. Period, end of story." Mark Cuban didn't stop there. "Whether you are an employee, you're going to have to understand how AI impacts your job and how you can use it to be better at your job. Same if you're a student. And if you're a CEO, you can't just say, okay, I'm going to get my tech guys to understand it and educate me on it. You have to understand it yourself because it will have significant impact on every single thing that you do. There's no avoiding it." This is coming from someone who built and sold the Dallas Mavericks, who made his first fortune selling a company to Yahoo for $5.7 billion in 1999, and who has spent the last two years going deeper on AI than almost any investor his age. He is describing the Innovator's AI Dilemma, entrepreneurs are right now building AI-native companies designed to displace every major incumbent. If a CEO tears down their company to rebuild it AI native, investors revolt but if they do nothing, AI-native startups eat their market and investors revolt anyway. Either path leads to shareholder lawsuits and there is no comfortable middle. The companies that survive will be the ones where leadership, not just the tech team, genuinely understands what the technology can do. The ones that don't will look back at this moment the same way Blockbuster looks at 2005.

StockMarket.News

163,464 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

The man who built Nvidia from a Denny's booth into the world's first $5 trillion company just told us exactly why AI will never take our jobs. "AI has no possibility of doing all of what we do. However, depending on the jobs that we do, sometimes it could do 20% of our jobs, a thousand times better." "For some people, it might be able to do 50% of their job, a thousand times better." "Every one of us should apply AI to automate, to become an assistant, to help us with that either 20%, 40% or 50%." "People ask me, Jensen, is AI going to take your job? And I tell them absolutely not. The person who uses AI to automate that 20% or 50% is going to take your job." PS. If you found value in this post make sure to like and repost this tweet + follow Uncover AI to stay updated with the latest AI news. See you in the next one:

The man who built Nvidia from a Denny's booth into the world's first $5 trillion company just told us exactly why AI will never take our jobs. "AI has no possibility of doing all of what we do. However, depending on the jobs that we do, sometimes it could do 20% of our jobs, a thousand times better." "For some people, it might be able to do 50% of their job, a thousand times better." "Every one of us should apply AI to automate, to become an assistant, to help us with that either 20%, 40% or 50%." "People ask me, Jensen, is AI going to take your job? And I tell them absolutely not. The person who uses AI to automate that 20% or 50% is going to take your job." PS. If you found value in this post make sure to like and repost this tweet + follow Uncover AI to stay updated with the latest AI news. See you in the next one:

Uncover AI

16,813 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

American says there is a huge issue taking place in the workforce It started with creative jobs and now it’s happening everywhere, including government job postings Companies are essentially mislabeling jobs. They are making job openings for independent contractors for jobs, but then giving instructions as if they were an employee. They tell you when you need to work and manage you like any other employee But they don’t have to pay sick time, overtime, insurance, nothing “They're not giving you any of the employee protections that you would give to somebody that you hire on, and they don't have to lay people off because they're just basically getting rid of everybody every, like, 6-9 months” This is actually a widespread issue and it’s such a widespread issue that California even had to pass legislation against it In California if they hire someone like this the work is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business and the worker is free from the hiring entity’s control and direction in how the work is performed This just shows that companies are abusing workers and hiring these people, directing them just like a normal employee but providing none of the perks. A loophole to screw people over

American says there is a huge issue taking place in the workforce It started with creative jobs and now it’s happening everywhere, including government job postings Companies are essentially mislabeling jobs. They are making job openings for independent contractors for jobs, but then giving instructions as if they were an employee. They tell you when you need to work and manage you like any other employee But they don’t have to pay sick time, overtime, insurance, nothing “They're not giving you any of the employee protections that you would give to somebody that you hire on, and they don't have to lay people off because they're just basically getting rid of everybody every, like, 6-9 months” This is actually a widespread issue and it’s such a widespread issue that California even had to pass legislation against it In California if they hire someone like this the work is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business and the worker is free from the hiring entity’s control and direction in how the work is performed This just shows that companies are abusing workers and hiring these people, directing them just like a normal employee but providing none of the perks. A loophole to screw people over

Wall Street Apes

81,092 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

The bottom rung of the career ladder just vanished. Everyone standing on it is in freefall. Dario Amodei stood at Davos and told an entire generation their entry into professional life is gone. Not threatened. Gone. AI doesn’t help with entry-level work. It replaced it. Amodei: “It can do entry-level law. Entry-level finance. Entry-level consulting.” The foundation work that built every career just ceased to exist. Research that took months. Analysis that took weeks. Documentation that built competence over years. All instant. All flawless. All free. The economics are extinction-level. AI transforms senior talent into gods. It simultaneously deletes the proving ground where everyone else learned to be useful. Graduates aren’t competing with each other. They’re competing with tireless intelligence that costs nothing, makes no mistakes, and improves daily. Amodei: “My concern with AI is it’s coming at us faster.” Agricultural revolution: centuries. Industrial revolution: generations. This: everywhere, everyone, right now. Entire professions collapsing in months, not lifetimes. This is speed as weapon. Jobs die faster than replacements spawn. No grace period. No retraining window. Just instantaneous irrelevance across every field that touches a keyboard. Amodei: “We can’t deny that it will also eliminate jobs.” Every prior technology birth more jobs than it killed. AI murders that pattern. It doesn’t disrupt one sector. It automates all human thought work simultaneously. This isn’t about getting more efficient. It’s about economic survival for tens of millions whose education became obsolete mid-degree. One equation matters: create faster than AI destroys. AI accelerates exponentially. Creation crawls linearly. The gap isn’t a problem to solve. It’s a chasm swallowing futures in real time with no bottom visible. Your degree isn’t worth less. It’s worth nothing. And the system that sold it to you has no answer for what you do now.

The bottom rung of the career ladder just vanished. Everyone standing on it is in freefall. Dario Amodei stood at Davos and told an entire generation their entry into professional life is gone. Not threatened. Gone. AI doesn’t help with entry-level work. It replaced it. Amodei: “It can do entry-level law. Entry-level finance. Entry-level consulting.” The foundation work that built every career just ceased to exist. Research that took months. Analysis that took weeks. Documentation that built competence over years. All instant. All flawless. All free. The economics are extinction-level. AI transforms senior talent into gods. It simultaneously deletes the proving ground where everyone else learned to be useful. Graduates aren’t competing with each other. They’re competing with tireless intelligence that costs nothing, makes no mistakes, and improves daily. Amodei: “My concern with AI is it’s coming at us faster.” Agricultural revolution: centuries. Industrial revolution: generations. This: everywhere, everyone, right now. Entire professions collapsing in months, not lifetimes. This is speed as weapon. Jobs die faster than replacements spawn. No grace period. No retraining window. Just instantaneous irrelevance across every field that touches a keyboard. Amodei: “We can’t deny that it will also eliminate jobs.” Every prior technology birth more jobs than it killed. AI murders that pattern. It doesn’t disrupt one sector. It automates all human thought work simultaneously. This isn’t about getting more efficient. It’s about economic survival for tens of millions whose education became obsolete mid-degree. One equation matters: create faster than AI destroys. AI accelerates exponentially. Creation crawls linearly. The gap isn’t a problem to solve. It’s a chasm swallowing futures in real time with no bottom visible. Your degree isn’t worth less. It’s worth nothing. And the system that sold it to you has no answer for what you do now.

Dustin

52,537 Aufrufe • vor 6 Monaten

Goldman Sachs just published the list of jobs AI will eliminate first. 300 million jobs globally. 25% of all US work hours. And that's not in 10 years, it's starting NOW. Highest risk of displacement according to Goldman: 1. Computer programmers 2. Accountants 3. Auditors 4. Legal assistants 5. Administrative assistants 6. Customer service reps 7. Telemarketers 8. Proofreaders 9. Copy editors 10. Credit analysts. 46% of all office and administrative tasks can be automated. 44% of legal work. 37% of architecture and engineering. 36% of science. 35% of business and finance. These aren't warehouse jobs. These aren't factory floor positions. These are the careers parents told their kids to pursue. "Go to college. Get a degree. Get a desk job. You'll be safe." Goldman Sachs just told you that desk is getting emptied. And the data is already showing up in real time: Tech employment as a share of the US economy has dropped below its long-term trend for the first time since records began. Marketing consulting, graphic design, office administration, and call centers are all seeing employment growth fall below trend. Younger workers are getting hit first and hardest. Goldman's lead economist said it directly: "The big story in 2026 in labor will be AI." But here's what the report doesn't mention: Goldman Sachs is one of the biggest investors in the companies BUILDING the AI that eliminates these jobs. They underwrote OpenAI's funding rounds. They're advising on the $700 billion in AI infrastructure spending this year. They profit from every merger, every capex deal, every stock offering tied to AI. The same bank telling you 300 million jobs are at risk is making billions helping the companies that will take them. And the corporate playbook is already locked in: Meta is firing 16,000 people. 20% of its entire workforce. While doubling AI spending to $135 billion. Stock went up 3% on the announcement. Block fired 40% of its staff. Stock surged 24%. Atlassian cut 10%. Same pattern. Over 61,000 AI-linked layoffs since November. 764 people per day losing their jobs in tech alone. Every single time a company announces mass layoffs and says "AI," the stock price goes up. Wall Street has created a system where firing humans is the most profitable announcement a CEO can make. Goldman's report says the jobs most PROTECTED from AI are air traffic controllers, chief executives, radiologists, pharmacists, and members of the clergy. Notice who's safe? The people at the top and the people praying. Everyone in the middle is exposed. The entry-level white-collar worker who spent four years and $200,000 on a degree is now competing against software that works 24/7, never takes vacation, never asks for a raise, and improves every single week. Goldman even admits younger workers in their 20s and 30s entering knowledge and content creation sectors will be "most affected." The generation that was told AI would make their lives better is the one getting displaced by it first. And it gets even WORSE: Goldman says if this displacement happens faster than their 10 year base case, the economic impact "could be much larger." Basically: if companies move fast, which they already are, the fallout will be worse than their projections. They're already moving fast. $700 billion in AI infrastructure this year. Mass layoffs at every major tech company. Stock prices rewarding every single one. The report is 50 pages of data telling you exactly what's coming. Most people won't read past the headline. But you just did.

Goldman Sachs just published the list of jobs AI will eliminate first. 300 million jobs globally. 25% of all US work hours. And that's not in 10 years, it's starting NOW. Highest risk of displacement according to Goldman: 1. Computer programmers 2. Accountants 3. Auditors 4. Legal assistants 5. Administrative assistants 6. Customer service reps 7. Telemarketers 8. Proofreaders 9. Copy editors 10. Credit analysts. 46% of all office and administrative tasks can be automated. 44% of legal work. 37% of architecture and engineering. 36% of science. 35% of business and finance. These aren't warehouse jobs. These aren't factory floor positions. These are the careers parents told their kids to pursue. "Go to college. Get a degree. Get a desk job. You'll be safe." Goldman Sachs just told you that desk is getting emptied. And the data is already showing up in real time: Tech employment as a share of the US economy has dropped below its long-term trend for the first time since records began. Marketing consulting, graphic design, office administration, and call centers are all seeing employment growth fall below trend. Younger workers are getting hit first and hardest. Goldman's lead economist said it directly: "The big story in 2026 in labor will be AI." But here's what the report doesn't mention: Goldman Sachs is one of the biggest investors in the companies BUILDING the AI that eliminates these jobs. They underwrote OpenAI's funding rounds. They're advising on the $700 billion in AI infrastructure spending this year. They profit from every merger, every capex deal, every stock offering tied to AI. The same bank telling you 300 million jobs are at risk is making billions helping the companies that will take them. And the corporate playbook is already locked in: Meta is firing 16,000 people. 20% of its entire workforce. While doubling AI spending to $135 billion. Stock went up 3% on the announcement. Block fired 40% of its staff. Stock surged 24%. Atlassian cut 10%. Same pattern. Over 61,000 AI-linked layoffs since November. 764 people per day losing their jobs in tech alone. Every single time a company announces mass layoffs and says "AI," the stock price goes up. Wall Street has created a system where firing humans is the most profitable announcement a CEO can make. Goldman's report says the jobs most PROTECTED from AI are air traffic controllers, chief executives, radiologists, pharmacists, and members of the clergy. Notice who's safe? The people at the top and the people praying. Everyone in the middle is exposed. The entry-level white-collar worker who spent four years and $200,000 on a degree is now competing against software that works 24/7, never takes vacation, never asks for a raise, and improves every single week. Goldman even admits younger workers in their 20s and 30s entering knowledge and content creation sectors will be "most affected." The generation that was told AI would make their lives better is the one getting displaced by it first. And it gets even WORSE: Goldman says if this displacement happens faster than their 10 year base case, the economic impact "could be much larger." Basically: if companies move fast, which they already are, the fallout will be worse than their projections. They're already moving fast. $700 billion in AI infrastructure this year. Mass layoffs at every major tech company. Stock prices rewarding every single one. The report is 50 pages of data telling you exactly what's coming. Most people won't read past the headline. But you just did.

Ricardo

235,712 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Some of us have been working and thinking about AI, started before most in AI today were born. To them they absolutely believe they have a lock of the dystopian fear. The saw too many Hollywood movies. I first say the VHS in the 1980s and the opening dialog never left me. The value of experience is it allows you to understand the way of things before the inexperienced can put their shoes on. Another example to learn in this video is Japan was the center of the universe. There was largess and I dare say arrogance. They absolutely were convince they would control AI via the government. It did not work out that way, like it ALWAYS does not work out that way. Each generation has to learn the hard lessons that should be obvious. A renegade group in Canada no one cared about to the thread all others dropped and you have AI today because of it. They were the last group to have been seen by the industry to have produced anything. Today the same playbook is being implemented by the largest AI companies full of zero experience and begging for big daddy government to save us from their scary monster. We turn the lights and show it is just some shadows. The entry prediction is accurate already, yet the world did not end. Watch this and see how really immature so many leaders are acting. Who will save us, millions of open source AI developers making thousands of AI models. And inventing the stuff the central controlled commissars never could have thought of. This is always the way it is. It is not “different” this time. They are too immature to know. Give them grace. Now you know better. Now you know. Speak up.

Some of us have been working and thinking about AI, started before most in AI today were born. To them they absolutely believe they have a lock of the dystopian fear. The saw too many Hollywood movies. I first say the VHS in the 1980s and the opening dialog never left me. The value of experience is it allows you to understand the way of things before the inexperienced can put their shoes on. Another example to learn in this video is Japan was the center of the universe. There was largess and I dare say arrogance. They absolutely were convince they would control AI via the government. It did not work out that way, like it ALWAYS does not work out that way. Each generation has to learn the hard lessons that should be obvious. A renegade group in Canada no one cared about to the thread all others dropped and you have AI today because of it. They were the last group to have been seen by the industry to have produced anything. Today the same playbook is being implemented by the largest AI companies full of zero experience and begging for big daddy government to save us from their scary monster. We turn the lights and show it is just some shadows. The entry prediction is accurate already, yet the world did not end. Watch this and see how really immature so many leaders are acting. Who will save us, millions of open source AI developers making thousands of AI models. And inventing the stuff the central controlled commissars never could have thought of. This is always the way it is. It is not “different” this time. They are too immature to know. Give them grace. Now you know better. Now you know. Speak up.

Brian Roemmele

15,451 Aufrufe • vor 9 Tagen

"We're trying to hire as many new grads as we can. We're finding that a lot of young people are agentmaxxing." - Replit founder Amjad Masad Amjad says that despite the “doom and gloom” around entry-level jobs, this is actually a “golden era” for young people who know how to use AI tools: "The roles are collapsing. We have designers shipping code, engineers shipping design, and salespeople shipping code." "The particular skill is not the bottleneck anymore. It is how ambitious you are, how generative you are, how creative you are, and how good you are at utilizing these tools." "So I think it's really a golden era for a lot of young people coming up right now in the job market. In our time, you would go and interview and become a Java J2EE software engineer doing global migrations. That was your title, right? It's no longer the case. We just want people to come and do things, and I think that's incredibly exciting."

"We're trying to hire as many new grads as we can. We're finding that a lot of young people are agentmaxxing." - Replit founder Amjad Masad Amjad says that despite the “doom and gloom” around entry-level jobs, this is actually a “golden era” for young people who know how to use AI tools: "The roles are collapsing. We have designers shipping code, engineers shipping design, and salespeople shipping code." "The particular skill is not the bottleneck anymore. It is how ambitious you are, how generative you are, how creative you are, and how good you are at utilizing these tools." "So I think it's really a golden era for a lot of young people coming up right now in the job market. In our time, you would go and interview and become a Java J2EE software engineer doing global migrations. That was your title, right? It's no longer the case. We just want people to come and do things, and I think that's incredibly exciting."

TBPN

47,144 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Anthropic CEO, Dario Amodei: "Cancer is cured, the economy grows 10%… and 20% of people don't have jobs". > That's the CEO of a $965B company, now worth more than OpenAI, describing the world he's building. Three things he keeps saying that most people still refuse to believe: One: half of all entry-level white-collar jobs could be gone in one to five years, with unemployment spiking to 10–20%. Two: it already started. Anthropic's own tools wiped $285 billion off software stocks in a single day, the worst day for the sector since the 2020 COVID crash. Three: the real accelerant isn't jobs, it's AI that builds AI. And he puts the odds it ends badly at roughly 25%. Save it. Reread in 2028 and see who was right.

Anthropic CEO, Dario Amodei: "Cancer is cured, the economy grows 10%… and 20% of people don't have jobs". > That's the CEO of a $965B company, now worth more than OpenAI, describing the world he's building. Three things he keeps saying that most people still refuse to believe: One: half of all entry-level white-collar jobs could be gone in one to five years, with unemployment spiking to 10–20%. Two: it already started. Anthropic's own tools wiped $285 billion off software stocks in a single day, the worst day for the sector since the 2020 COVID crash. Three: the real accelerant isn't jobs, it's AI that builds AI. And he puts the odds it ends badly at roughly 25%. Save it. Reread in 2028 and see who was right.

Atenov int.

144,292 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

Ansem explains why you need to learn AI right now “AI is going to make everybody 10x more efficient at whatever it is that they’re doing” “If you’re concerned about your job… you need to get up to speed and become an expert at using AI as fast as possible” “There’s going to be people who choose not to do that and people who do. In a few years, people are going to look at AI the same way as being able to use the internet” “Obviously someone who knows how to use the internet is a way better candidate than someone who doesn’t, it’s going to be the same with AI” “Whenever you have these technological breakthroughs happen, you create more jobs that didn’t even exist before. I think AI is going to do that more so than displace people”

Ansem explains why you need to learn AI right now “AI is going to make everybody 10x more efficient at whatever it is that they’re doing” “If you’re concerned about your job… you need to get up to speed and become an expert at using AI as fast as possible” “There’s going to be people who choose not to do that and people who do. In a few years, people are going to look at AI the same way as being able to use the internet” “Obviously someone who knows how to use the internet is a way better candidate than someone who doesn’t, it’s going to be the same with AI” “Whenever you have these technological breakthroughs happen, you create more jobs that didn’t even exist before. I think AI is going to do that more so than displace people”

Market Bubble

19,995 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

There is a prediction circulating in AI circles right now that most people are not taking seriously enough and the data says they should be. Within the next year or two, if you work remotely, your company will be able to create a digital twin of you. A model that speaks like you, writes like you, has learned from everything you have done right and wrong, your tone, your judgment calls, your workflow. It will be you on the other side of Zoom or Slack and no one could tell the difference. The harder question, the one nobody wants to sit with is whether it will actually be worse at your job than you are. Probably not. It will never sleep and it will always learn from its mistakes and it will cost 10 to 100 times less than you do and is tax deductible on top of that. The data is not speculative at this point. Anthropic's own labor market report pulled from millions of real Claude conversations found that AI can already theoretically automate 94% of tasks in computer and math occupations, 60-80% across law, office work, and tech. Actual usage is still at 10-20% of that potential which means we are in the early innings of the gap closing. Companies already know what direction this is headed. One in five companies replaced specific roles with AI in 2025 and by end of 2026, 30-37% plan to do so. Amazon cut 14,000 corporate jobs citing AI, Klarna replaced 700 customer service workers, Duolingo offboarded 10% of its contractor workforce. Anthropic's own first internal role eliminated was the engineer who reviewed Claude Code releases before they went to production. The argument from the clip is that the human in the loop is approaching the point of being a liability, the dumbest person on a team that is otherwise AI. That inflection point, by this estimate, is somewhere in the next 900 days.

There is a prediction circulating in AI circles right now that most people are not taking seriously enough and the data says they should be. Within the next year or two, if you work remotely, your company will be able to create a digital twin of you. A model that speaks like you, writes like you, has learned from everything you have done right and wrong, your tone, your judgment calls, your workflow. It will be you on the other side of Zoom or Slack and no one could tell the difference. The harder question, the one nobody wants to sit with is whether it will actually be worse at your job than you are. Probably not. It will never sleep and it will always learn from its mistakes and it will cost 10 to 100 times less than you do and is tax deductible on top of that. The data is not speculative at this point. Anthropic's own labor market report pulled from millions of real Claude conversations found that AI can already theoretically automate 94% of tasks in computer and math occupations, 60-80% across law, office work, and tech. Actual usage is still at 10-20% of that potential which means we are in the early innings of the gap closing. Companies already know what direction this is headed. One in five companies replaced specific roles with AI in 2025 and by end of 2026, 30-37% plan to do so. Amazon cut 14,000 corporate jobs citing AI, Klarna replaced 700 customer service workers, Duolingo offboarded 10% of its contractor workforce. Anthropic's own first internal role eliminated was the engineer who reviewed Claude Code releases before they went to production. The argument from the clip is that the human in the loop is approaching the point of being a liability, the dumbest person on a team that is otherwise AI. That inflection point, by this estimate, is somewhere in the next 900 days.

Milk Road AI

17,600 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

Orlando Bravo: "The SaaSpocalypse is over... AI is an enormous, enormous tailwind for software companies... I was here last year at Super Return, and I think one of the LLM leaders made a comment that by this year, 50% of all white-collar jobs are going to be gone. And somebody in private equity made a comment that 50% of the people in this conference wouldn't have a job by next year. And look at the conference. You even had security outside. There's more people here than ever before... Our companies, 60% of the code that they write is machine-generated. But our number of developers, we have 20,000 of them, they're going up because now they can be a lot more productive."

Orlando Bravo: "The SaaSpocalypse is over... AI is an enormous, enormous tailwind for software companies... I was here last year at Super Return, and I think one of the LLM leaders made a comment that by this year, 50% of all white-collar jobs are going to be gone. And somebody in private equity made a comment that 50% of the people in this conference wouldn't have a job by next year. And look at the conference. You even had security outside. There's more people here than ever before... Our companies, 60% of the code that they write is machine-generated. But our number of developers, we have 20,000 of them, they're going up because now they can be a lot more productive."

Marcelo P. Lima

208,759 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Uber Investor Bill Gurley on why young graduates anxious about AI taking their jobs are thinking about it the wrong way: When asked what advice he'd give to new graduates worried about AI eliminating entry-level roles, he reframed the entire problem with an advice: "In any role in any field, be the most AI enabled version of yourself you can possibly be." To illustrate why, Bill draws on an analogy from anthropology: "There's tons of anthropologists that have written about how we evolve with our tools. And you can just imagine a farming competition between a guy with a tractor and some drones and the other guy's got a plow and a donkey. Who's going to win?" The implication is clear: AI isn't the threat. Being the person who hasn't learned to use it is. Bill Gurley explains how this plays out inside organisations: "If there are 40 people in your org all doing the same thing and you understand how AI affects that role more than the rest of them, you're not getting laid off. Like, it's just not going to happen." But the upside goes beyond simply keeping your job. Becoming AI-enabled changes the nature of the work itself: "You'll also start to understand what parts of your job are a threat or not. And maybe you can elevate yourself to where you're a designer and not the worker bee because you now have this power." The takeaway for young professionals is that the anxiety is misplaced, since AI only replaces the version of you that refused to learn it.

Uber Investor Bill Gurley on why young graduates anxious about AI taking their jobs are thinking about it the wrong way: When asked what advice he'd give to new graduates worried about AI eliminating entry-level roles, he reframed the entire problem with an advice: "In any role in any field, be the most AI enabled version of yourself you can possibly be." To illustrate why, Bill draws on an analogy from anthropology: "There's tons of anthropologists that have written about how we evolve with our tools. And you can just imagine a farming competition between a guy with a tractor and some drones and the other guy's got a plow and a donkey. Who's going to win?" The implication is clear: AI isn't the threat. Being the person who hasn't learned to use it is. Bill Gurley explains how this plays out inside organisations: "If there are 40 people in your org all doing the same thing and you understand how AI affects that role more than the rest of them, you're not getting laid off. Like, it's just not going to happen." But the upside goes beyond simply keeping your job. Becoming AI-enabled changes the nature of the work itself: "You'll also start to understand what parts of your job are a threat or not. And maybe you can elevate yourself to where you're a designer and not the worker bee because you now have this power." The takeaway for young professionals is that the anxiety is misplaced, since AI only replaces the version of you that refused to learn it.

Big Brain AI

84,888 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten