Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Beim Laden dieses Videos ist ein Problem aufgetreten. Dies könnte an einem vorübergehenden Netzwerkproblem liegen oder das Video ist möglicherweise nicht verfügbar.

The countdown has entered its final stretch.⏳ Only 4 days remain before the Abakkus Small Cap Fund NFO closes! Abakkus Small Cap Fund. Discovering Hidden Gems. Unearthing Value. NFO Closes: 12th March, 2026 🔗 Learn more about the Abakkus Small Cap Fund at Mutual Fund investments are subject to... show more

Abakkus Mutual Fund

1,972 subscribers

39,292 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

The wait is finally over. After a journey guided by patience, research, and conviction, we step into a new chapter with the Abakkus Small Cap Fund. 🗓️NFO Opens: 26th February, 2026 NFO Closes: 12th March, 2026 🔗Learn more about the Abakkus Small Cap Fund at Mutual Fund investments are subject to market risks, read all scheme related documents carefully. #Abakkus #AbakkusMutualFund #SmallCapFund #NFO #NewFundOffer

The wait is finally over. After a journey guided by patience, research, and conviction, we step into a new chapter with the Abakkus Small Cap Fund. 🗓️NFO Opens: 26th February, 2026 NFO Closes: 12th March, 2026 🔗Learn more about the Abakkus Small Cap Fund at Mutual Fund investments are subject to market risks, read all scheme related documents carefully. #Abakkus #AbakkusMutualFund #SmallCapFund #NFO #NewFundOffer

Abakkus Mutual Fund

23,406 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

📢 Say hello to the Capitalmind Flexi Cap Fund. No noise. Just quant-led investing. 🎥 Watch how you can #WinatLife Mutual Fund investments are subject to market risks, read all scheme related documents carefully. #mutualfund #nfoalert #newfundoffer #flexicapfund

📢 Say hello to the Capitalmind Flexi Cap Fund. No noise. Just quant-led investing. 🎥 Watch how you can #WinatLife Mutual Fund investments are subject to market risks, read all scheme related documents carefully. #mutualfund #nfoalert #newfundoffer #flexicapfund

Capitalmind Mutual Fund

22,664 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Thank you Motilal wealth. Usual disclaimer applies: Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. Read the offer documents carefully before investing.

Thank you Motilal wealth. Usual disclaimer applies: Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks. Read the offer documents carefully before investing.

Samir Arora

36,717 Aufrufe • vor 11 Monaten

On this weeks episode of The Money Mindset, we feature legendary mutual fund manager Chirag Setalvad of HDFC Mutual Fund , someone who has watched the stock markets and managed public money for over decades . He tells me he is cautious on the market now. 🔑 Key Topics Discussed: Current Market Outlook: Chirag discusses the market’s performance, rising concerns over inflated valuations, and why patience is crucial in volatile times. Building a Long-Term Portfolio: Learn Chirag’s strategies for selecting quality companies at reasonable prices and holding them for the long term. Caution in Current Market Conditions: Chirag shares his cautious approach to navigating today's market, emphasizing cash levels and disciplined investing. Asset Allocation and Risk Management: How a balanced approach to asset allocation can mitigate risks and maximize long-term gains. Midcap & Small Cap Strategies: Insights on why midcap and small-cap stocks offer opportunities and how to approach them in uncertain times. Full episode here ⭐️

On this weeks episode of The Money Mindset, we feature legendary mutual fund manager Chirag Setalvad of HDFC Mutual Fund , someone who has watched the stock markets and managed public money for over decades . He tells me he is cautious on the market now. 🔑 Key Topics Discussed: Current Market Outlook: Chirag discusses the market’s performance, rising concerns over inflated valuations, and why patience is crucial in volatile times. Building a Long-Term Portfolio: Learn Chirag’s strategies for selecting quality companies at reasonable prices and holding them for the long term. Caution in Current Market Conditions: Chirag shares his cautious approach to navigating today's market, emphasizing cash levels and disciplined investing. Asset Allocation and Risk Management: How a balanced approach to asset allocation can mitigate risks and maximize long-term gains. Midcap & Small Cap Strategies: Insights on why midcap and small-cap stocks offer opportunities and how to approach them in uncertain times. Full episode here ⭐️

Sonia Shenoy

20,968 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Bitcoin is typically known for its high growth potential and volatility, but not for generating income. The NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) seeks to harness that volatility through a data-driven call option strategy, aiming for high monthly income while maintaining upside exposure, all within an accessible ETF. Learn more about BTCI at BTCI does not invest in Bitcoin directly. There is no assurance that the Fund will meet its investment objective. The value of your investment in the Fund, as well as the amount of return you receive on your investment in the Fund, may fluctuate significantly. You may lose part or all of your investment in the Fund or your investment may not perform as well as other similar investments. Therefore, you should consider carefully the following risks before investing in the Fund. An investment in the Fund is not a bank deposit and is not insured or guaranteed by the FDIC or any government agency.

Bitcoin is typically known for its high growth potential and volatility, but not for generating income. The NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) seeks to harness that volatility through a data-driven call option strategy, aiming for high monthly income while maintaining upside exposure, all within an accessible ETF. Learn more about BTCI at BTCI does not invest in Bitcoin directly. There is no assurance that the Fund will meet its investment objective. The value of your investment in the Fund, as well as the amount of return you receive on your investment in the Fund, may fluctuate significantly. You may lose part or all of your investment in the Fund or your investment may not perform as well as other similar investments. Therefore, you should consider carefully the following risks before investing in the Fund. An investment in the Fund is not a bank deposit and is not insured or guaranteed by the FDIC or any government agency.

NEOS Investments

19,465 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

The closer you get to a financial goal, the less time you have to recover from a market fall. Yet many portfolios remain just as risky near the goal as they were at the start. Reducing risk over time sounds easy, but behaviour often gets in the way. When markets are rising, cutting equity exposure feels like missing out. When they fall, it feels like locking in losses. So many investors delay rebalancing and take more risk than they should. Life Cycle funds address this through a pre-defined glide path. They invest across equity, debt, and gold, gradually reducing equity exposure and making the portfolio more conservative as the target year approaches. Zerodha Fund House has launched two such funds: - Zerodha Life Cycle Fund 2036: for goals roughly 10 years away - Zerodha Life Cycle Fund 2041: for goals roughly 15 years away The NFO is now open on Coin by Zerodha. Link in the comments. Here's all you need to know👇

The closer you get to a financial goal, the less time you have to recover from a market fall. Yet many portfolios remain just as risky near the goal as they were at the start. Reducing risk over time sounds easy, but behaviour often gets in the way. When markets are rising, cutting equity exposure feels like missing out. When they fall, it feels like locking in losses. So many investors delay rebalancing and take more risk than they should. Life Cycle funds address this through a pre-defined glide path. They invest across equity, debt, and gold, gradually reducing equity exposure and making the portfolio more conservative as the target year approaches. Zerodha Fund House has launched two such funds: - Zerodha Life Cycle Fund 2036: for goals roughly 10 years away - Zerodha Life Cycle Fund 2041: for goals roughly 15 years away The NFO is now open on Coin by Zerodha. Link in the comments. Here's all you need to know👇

Zerodha

31,151 Aufrufe • vor 24 Tagen

On this weeks episode of The Money Mindset, I spoke to Neil Parikh, the Chairman and CEO of PPFAS mutual fund and son of legendary stock market investor, Parag Parikh PPFAS Mutual Fund's Flexi cap scheme crossed Rs 1 lakh crore AUM in May this year. The scheme has returned 19% since its inception on May 24, 2013 Our topic on the show was how to invest in the international markets Parag parikh mutual funds will launch 3 new international funds this year from Gift City , the funds are aimed at helping investors diversify their portfolios towards global offerings. Full episode out now on The Money Mindset YT channel PPFAS NEIL PARIKH

On this weeks episode of The Money Mindset, I spoke to Neil Parikh, the Chairman and CEO of PPFAS mutual fund and son of legendary stock market investor, Parag Parikh PPFAS Mutual Fund's Flexi cap scheme crossed Rs 1 lakh crore AUM in May this year. The scheme has returned 19% since its inception on May 24, 2013 Our topic on the show was how to invest in the international markets Parag parikh mutual funds will launch 3 new international funds this year from Gift City , the funds are aimed at helping investors diversify their portfolios towards global offerings. Full episode out now on The Money Mindset YT channel PPFAS NEIL PARIKH

Sonia Shenoy

51,676 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Henry on how nearly all market returns come from 1% of companies: "There's 4,000 public stocks. How many of them truly are great? Over a rolling 10 year period, you have about 40 stocks that compound wealth at 20% a year or go up ~6x. So about 1%. I read the shareholder letters and tried to understand what drove the success of the New Horizon Fund. It was really only 20 stocks over 50 years that drove the performance. Walmart first came public as a super small company. And this is definitely one of the 20 stocks that mattered. But, unfortunately, it was sold. I was managing about $8 billion, and had the stake in Walmart not been sold, it would have been greater than the sum total of everything that I was managing. I love small cap companies because I love the people side of the job, but I also love them because 80% of these great companies actually start as small caps."

Henry on how nearly all market returns come from 1% of companies: "There's 4,000 public stocks. How many of them truly are great? Over a rolling 10 year period, you have about 40 stocks that compound wealth at 20% a year or go up ~6x. So about 1%. I read the shareholder letters and tried to understand what drove the success of the New Horizon Fund. It was really only 20 stocks over 50 years that drove the performance. Walmart first came public as a super small company. And this is definitely one of the 20 stocks that mattered. But, unfortunately, it was sold. I was managing about $8 billion, and had the stake in Walmart not been sold, it would have been greater than the sum total of everything that I was managing. I love small cap companies because I love the people side of the job, but I also love them because 80% of these great companies actually start as small caps."

Patrick OShaughnessy

197,621 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

Most $SUI holders know one thing about the token: total supply is capped at 10 billion. They have never read the mechanic that makes that cap matter. It is called the Storage Fund. And it is the most important thing in the $SUI tokenomics docs that nobody is talking about. Here is exactly how it works: Every time a transaction adds data to the Sui blockchain, the user pays a storage fee. That fee does not go to validators directly. It goes into the Storage Fund, a pool of SUI that never fully depletes. Here is where it gets interesting. The Storage Fund has its own stake in the network. It earns staking rewards the same way every other stakeholder does. Those rewards are then distributed to validators to compensate them for storing historical data. This solves a problem every other blockchain ignores: When a new validator joins Sui, they have to store all the historical data from transactions that happened before they existed. Why would a new validator pay to store someone else's old data? The Storage Fund pays them for it. Past users who created the storage requirements in the first place funded the pool. Future validators get compensated from that pool indefinitely. The fund pays out only the returns on its capital, never the principal. It cannot be drained. It is designed to survive forever. Now here is the part that directly connects to $SUI token value. The Sui docs state this explicitly: Deflation is a feature of Sui, not a bug. Here is why: Total supply is capped at 10 billion SUI. As network activity increases, more transactions are processed. More transactions mean more storage fees flowing into the Storage Fund. As the Storage Fund grows, it holds more SUI. More SUI held in the fund means less SUI in active circulation. Less circulating supply against the same or growing demand means the value of each SUI token increases. Network growth directly reduces circulating supply. That is not speculation. That is the economic model built into the protocol at the architecture level. One more detail worth knowing: If you delete data you stored on chain, you receive a partial refund of your original storage fees. The system charges for storage, rewards deletion, and compounds the fund's stake indefinitely. Most people holding $SUI today are pricing the speed narrative: The parallel transaction processing. The sub-second finality. The Move language safety. They have not started pricing the storage fund deflation mechanic. That gap between what the tokenomics actually does and what the market currently understands is where the long-term thesis lives. The people who read the docs always buy before the people who read the price.

Most $SUI holders know one thing about the token: total supply is capped at 10 billion. They have never read the mechanic that makes that cap matter. It is called the Storage Fund. And it is the most important thing in the $SUI tokenomics docs that nobody is talking about. Here is exactly how it works: Every time a transaction adds data to the Sui blockchain, the user pays a storage fee. That fee does not go to validators directly. It goes into the Storage Fund, a pool of SUI that never fully depletes. Here is where it gets interesting. The Storage Fund has its own stake in the network. It earns staking rewards the same way every other stakeholder does. Those rewards are then distributed to validators to compensate them for storing historical data. This solves a problem every other blockchain ignores: When a new validator joins Sui, they have to store all the historical data from transactions that happened before they existed. Why would a new validator pay to store someone else's old data? The Storage Fund pays them for it. Past users who created the storage requirements in the first place funded the pool. Future validators get compensated from that pool indefinitely. The fund pays out only the returns on its capital, never the principal. It cannot be drained. It is designed to survive forever. Now here is the part that directly connects to $SUI token value. The Sui docs state this explicitly: Deflation is a feature of Sui, not a bug. Here is why: Total supply is capped at 10 billion SUI. As network activity increases, more transactions are processed. More transactions mean more storage fees flowing into the Storage Fund. As the Storage Fund grows, it holds more SUI. More SUI held in the fund means less SUI in active circulation. Less circulating supply against the same or growing demand means the value of each SUI token increases. Network growth directly reduces circulating supply. That is not speculation. That is the economic model built into the protocol at the architecture level. One more detail worth knowing: If you delete data you stored on chain, you receive a partial refund of your original storage fees. The system charges for storage, rewards deletion, and compounds the fund's stake indefinitely. Most people holding $SUI today are pricing the speed narrative: The parallel transaction processing. The sub-second finality. The Move language safety. They have not started pricing the storage fund deflation mechanic. That gap between what the tokenomics actually does and what the market currently understands is where the long-term thesis lives. The people who read the docs always buy before the people who read the price.

2xnmore

47,562 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

A $500M exit is "completely unexciting" to institutional VCs. Sheel Mohnot breaks down the economics behind why, and it changes everything about how founders should think about fundraising. His fund: $140M Their minimum exciting exit: $500M+ Fund math is unforgiving. To return 3x to LPs, they need their winners to be massive. His take on LatAm: "I think they're pursuing opportunities that are too small... just because the market sizes are smaller GDP-wise." This isn't criticism. It's pattern recognition. When you anchor to local market size, you build local solutions. Local solutions cap at local outcomes. And local outcomes don't return venture funds. The founders who crack this don't think about markets geographically. They think about problems globally. Stripe didn't build for Silicon Valley. Spotify didn't build for Sweden. Rappi didn't build for Colombia. They built global solutions that happened to launch locally. That's the shift. Think global. Launch local. Scale everywhere.

A $500M exit is "completely unexciting" to institutional VCs. Sheel Mohnot breaks down the economics behind why, and it changes everything about how founders should think about fundraising. His fund: $140M Their minimum exciting exit: $500M+ Fund math is unforgiving. To return 3x to LPs, they need their winners to be massive. His take on LatAm: "I think they're pursuing opportunities that are too small... just because the market sizes are smaller GDP-wise." This isn't criticism. It's pattern recognition. When you anchor to local market size, you build local solutions. Local solutions cap at local outcomes. And local outcomes don't return venture funds. The founders who crack this don't think about markets geographically. They think about problems globally. Stripe didn't build for Silicon Valley. Spotify didn't build for Sweden. Rappi didn't build for Colombia. They built global solutions that happened to launch locally. That's the shift. Think global. Launch local. Scale everywhere.

Hustle Fund 🦛🌽💛

40,630 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

The NZ$2B BlackRock renewable energy fund: A failed promise for NZ’s green future? From 2023 to 2025, millions of taxpayer dollars have been lost & the promised jobs have failed to materialise. In Aug 2023, the Ardern's Labour party (led at the time by PM Hipkins) partnered with BlackRock to launch a $2 billion climate fund, aiming for 100% renewable electricity by 2030 via solar, wind, green hydrogen, & battery storage. Hailed as a world-first, it promised jobs and innovation. The fund drew on taxpayer money via NZ Green Investment Finance (NZGIF), a Crown entity funded by public resources incl: ACC, KiwiSaver, & the NZ Super Fund. By using NZGIF, the government exposed taxpayers to risks of financial loss if investments failed-& they did. The first investment was SolarZero- a high-risk company with potential. (With better due diligence, this investment would not have gone forward.) The company was first acquired by BlackRock in Nov 2022 for approximately $110M. However, BlackRock later injected a further $147.8M into the business, bringing total capital involved to roughly $257.8M. Of this, NZGIF provided a $145M debt facility, & BlackRock contributed $112.8M. SolarZero aimed to scale solar energy in NZ with a pay-over-time model. But on Nov 26, 2024, BlackRock placed it into liquidation after it missed sales targets. Of the $145M facility, only $115M had been drawn down by the time of collapse. The full $257.8M was not "lost" as a single sum; the total recovery outcome remains uncertain. The collapse left around 160 staff jobless, with $4-5M in unpaid obligations. The loss of at least $115M of taxpayer money — representing roughly 5.75% of the $2B fund ,this was a huge blow to its credibility, leaving taxpayers with little hope of full recovery. Despite SolarZero’s failure, BlackRock charges fees reported at 1.5% annually on invested capital. While the total $50.57M fee figure is (not verified in public records), it is confirmed that BlackRock charged $4.35M on NZGIF’s $145M commitment, taxpayer money for a failed project. The fund now “seems to have gone nowhere,” with no new major projects announced and roughly $1.69 billion idle. BlackRock’s Auckland office, opened in July 2023 with around 10 staff, has delivered nothing new, appearing only to manage the fallout while fees continue. MBIE, overseeing NZ’s energy strategy, has offered no public updates. The lack of transparency raises questions about the government’s choice to partner with BlackRock, potentially delaying NZ’s 100% renewable goal. The financial losses, fees charged on taxpayer money, & lack of outcomes have led to perceptions of a “renewable investment scam,” eroding trust in BlackRock and the government. January 2026: BlackRock abandoned the $2 billion NZ Climate Infrastructure Fund. The fund is now dead. With $1.69 billion left, there was potential to salvage the fund, but this remains a sad tale of risks with global asset managers & taxpayer funds. Claims have also emerged during this time-including allegations of government officials receiving kickbacks from the deal, with a Ardern being named. No evidence has been provided to support these claims. NZGIF has advanced $314,000 in taxpayer money to fund legal investigations into whether SolarZero hid money from creditors by shifting assets into separate trusts before collapsing. NZGIF's chance of recovery in drawn-down funds hinges entirely on whether the court agrees those payments were improper. If the liquidators win, some money may be clawed back. If not, money is likely gone for good.. 2026 BlackRock has abandoned NZ Climate Infrastructure Fund. The fund is now dead.

The NZ$2B BlackRock renewable energy fund: A failed promise for NZ’s green future? From 2023 to 2025, millions of taxpayer dollars have been lost & the promised jobs have failed to materialise. In Aug 2023, the Ardern's Labour party (led at the time by PM Hipkins) partnered with BlackRock to launch a $2 billion climate fund, aiming for 100% renewable electricity by 2030 via solar, wind, green hydrogen, & battery storage. Hailed as a world-first, it promised jobs and innovation. The fund drew on taxpayer money via NZ Green Investment Finance (NZGIF), a Crown entity funded by public resources incl: ACC, KiwiSaver, & the NZ Super Fund. By using NZGIF, the government exposed taxpayers to risks of financial loss if investments failed-& they did. The first investment was SolarZero- a high-risk company with potential. (With better due diligence, this investment would not have gone forward.) The company was first acquired by BlackRock in Nov 2022 for approximately $110M. However, BlackRock later injected a further $147.8M into the business, bringing total capital involved to roughly $257.8M. Of this, NZGIF provided a $145M debt facility, & BlackRock contributed $112.8M. SolarZero aimed to scale solar energy in NZ with a pay-over-time model. But on Nov 26, 2024, BlackRock placed it into liquidation after it missed sales targets. Of the $145M facility, only $115M had been drawn down by the time of collapse. The full $257.8M was not "lost" as a single sum; the total recovery outcome remains uncertain. The collapse left around 160 staff jobless, with $4-5M in unpaid obligations. The loss of at least $115M of taxpayer money — representing roughly 5.75% of the $2B fund ,this was a huge blow to its credibility, leaving taxpayers with little hope of full recovery. Despite SolarZero’s failure, BlackRock charges fees reported at 1.5% annually on invested capital. While the total $50.57M fee figure is (not verified in public records), it is confirmed that BlackRock charged $4.35M on NZGIF’s $145M commitment, taxpayer money for a failed project. The fund now “seems to have gone nowhere,” with no new major projects announced and roughly $1.69 billion idle. BlackRock’s Auckland office, opened in July 2023 with around 10 staff, has delivered nothing new, appearing only to manage the fallout while fees continue. MBIE, overseeing NZ’s energy strategy, has offered no public updates. The lack of transparency raises questions about the government’s choice to partner with BlackRock, potentially delaying NZ’s 100% renewable goal. The financial losses, fees charged on taxpayer money, & lack of outcomes have led to perceptions of a “renewable investment scam,” eroding trust in BlackRock and the government. January 2026: BlackRock abandoned the $2 billion NZ Climate Infrastructure Fund. The fund is now dead. With $1.69 billion left, there was potential to salvage the fund, but this remains a sad tale of risks with global asset managers & taxpayer funds. Claims have also emerged during this time-including allegations of government officials receiving kickbacks from the deal, with a Ardern being named. No evidence has been provided to support these claims. NZGIF has advanced $314,000 in taxpayer money to fund legal investigations into whether SolarZero hid money from creditors by shifting assets into separate trusts before collapsing. NZGIF's chance of recovery in drawn-down funds hinges entirely on whether the court agrees those payments were improper. If the liquidators win, some money may be clawed back. If not, money is likely gone for good.. 2026 BlackRock has abandoned NZ Climate Infrastructure Fund. The fund is now dead.

Neil Edwards

11,474 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

Introducing SOLC — the Canary Marinade Solana ETF We believe Solana represents a major advancement in blockchain scalability and performance, supporting real-world use cases through speed and efficiency. Marinade’s liquid staking protocol offers a flexible way to participate in Solana’s growing ecosystem. Learn more: — Please read the prospectus carefully before investing. To obtain a current prospectus, visit The Fund’s investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses should be considered before investing. The Fund is not registered under the investment Company Act of 1940, and not subject to the same regulatory requirements and protections. Carefully consider the risk factors, investment objectives, fees, expenses, and other information associated with before making an investment decision. All investments are speculative, may be illiquid and involve a high degree of risk, uncertainty, and there is risk of the complete loss of the investment. There is no guarantee that any specific outcome will be achieved. We do not offer tax, financial, accounting or legal advice.

Introducing SOLC — the Canary Marinade Solana ETF We believe Solana represents a major advancement in blockchain scalability and performance, supporting real-world use cases through speed and efficiency. Marinade’s liquid staking protocol offers a flexible way to participate in Solana’s growing ecosystem. Learn more: — Please read the prospectus carefully before investing. To obtain a current prospectus, visit The Fund’s investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses should be considered before investing. The Fund is not registered under the investment Company Act of 1940, and not subject to the same regulatory requirements and protections. Carefully consider the risk factors, investment objectives, fees, expenses, and other information associated with before making an investment decision. All investments are speculative, may be illiquid and involve a high degree of risk, uncertainty, and there is risk of the complete loss of the investment. There is no guarantee that any specific outcome will be achieved. We do not offer tax, financial, accounting or legal advice.

Canary Capital

49,985 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

since 1993, hedge funds over $100M have been legally required to publish every position they hold 4 times a year, exact stocks and exact share counts, all of it free on the SEC website i spent 6 months asking one question with python: what happens when 4 or more separate funds all show up with new positions in the same small-cap stock in the same quarter - before the price has moved? backtested 2,400 signals from 2019 to 2025 67% win rate, 18.4% average gain per trade, 31 day average hold the reason the edge exists is the same reason the funds themselves can't collect it an $8B fund building a position in a $400M company moves the price against itself the second it starts buying so they file 45 days after the fact, the window opens, and nobody's standing in it running it live since february - 11 closed trades, 9 winners, +31% while the s&p returned 8% in the same period setup cost: a free API key from SEC EDGAR and one saturday morning this isn't an edge i found by being smart. it's an edge that only exists because the people publishing it are too large to use it themselves Bookmark before it get losted the filing requirement has been law since the clinton administration, sitting in a public federal database for 30 years most retail traders pay monthly subscriptions to signal services built by people who just learned to read a government XML file the data was never hidden. it just required knowing where to look

since 1993, hedge funds over $100M have been legally required to publish every position they hold 4 times a year, exact stocks and exact share counts, all of it free on the SEC website i spent 6 months asking one question with python: what happens when 4 or more separate funds all show up with new positions in the same small-cap stock in the same quarter - before the price has moved? backtested 2,400 signals from 2019 to 2025 67% win rate, 18.4% average gain per trade, 31 day average hold the reason the edge exists is the same reason the funds themselves can't collect it an $8B fund building a position in a $400M company moves the price against itself the second it starts buying so they file 45 days after the fact, the window opens, and nobody's standing in it running it live since february - 11 closed trades, 9 winners, +31% while the s&p returned 8% in the same period setup cost: a free API key from SEC EDGAR and one saturday morning this isn't an edge i found by being smart. it's an edge that only exists because the people publishing it are too large to use it themselves Bookmark before it get losted the filing requirement has been law since the clinton administration, sitting in a public federal database for 30 years most retail traders pay monthly subscriptions to signal services built by people who just learned to read a government XML file the data was never hidden. it just required knowing where to look

Livsun

32,072 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🚨SPACEX WILL CRASH JUST LIKE TESLA DID IN 2010 The exact same setup played out 16 years ago. Rewind to 2010. Tesla goes public at $1.13. Pumps to $2.03 in days. The timeline floods with the same takes: "Elon is building the future." "This is a generational entry." "You will regret missing this." Then reality showed up. Tesla bled almost 50% in one week. $2.03 → $1.00 Retail got flushed before the real run even started. Fast forward to now. 2026: – SpaceX just printed the biggest IPO in market history – +30% from the IPO price on day one – $1.75T valuation out the gate – Retail access unlocked at the very last second – Everyone is already calling it "the next Tesla" But the setup is nothing alike. Tesla 2010 launched into: - A beaten down market - Low expectations - Small cap valuation - Zero hype tax SpaceX 2026 is launching into: - The most overvalued market on record - Peak retail euphoria - A $1.75T price tag before a single earnings report - Every fund already positioned That is not the same trade. That is the exit liquidity version of it. People hear Tesla 2010 and only remember the pump. Tesla pumped first. Then it destroyed everyone who chased it. That part always gets removed from the screenshot. Now SpaceX has the same Elon premium and the same future narrative, but much worse timing. So you have two choices: Chase the most expensive IPO in history after a +30% launch candle. Or learn from what Tesla already did. Reminder: I called Bitcoin at $16K, the top at $126K, and gold before it ran. Eight years of calls, all public. When I exit this market, I post it here first. Every move goes here too. Turn notifications on. You will understand why later.

🚨SPACEX WILL CRASH JUST LIKE TESLA DID IN 2010 The exact same setup played out 16 years ago. Rewind to 2010. Tesla goes public at $1.13. Pumps to $2.03 in days. The timeline floods with the same takes: "Elon is building the future." "This is a generational entry." "You will regret missing this." Then reality showed up. Tesla bled almost 50% in one week. $2.03 → $1.00 Retail got flushed before the real run even started. Fast forward to now. 2026: – SpaceX just printed the biggest IPO in market history – +30% from the IPO price on day one – $1.75T valuation out the gate – Retail access unlocked at the very last second – Everyone is already calling it "the next Tesla" But the setup is nothing alike. Tesla 2010 launched into: - A beaten down market - Low expectations - Small cap valuation - Zero hype tax SpaceX 2026 is launching into: - The most overvalued market on record - Peak retail euphoria - A $1.75T price tag before a single earnings report - Every fund already positioned That is not the same trade. That is the exit liquidity version of it. People hear Tesla 2010 and only remember the pump. Tesla pumped first. Then it destroyed everyone who chased it. That part always gets removed from the screenshot. Now SpaceX has the same Elon premium and the same future narrative, but much worse timing. So you have two choices: Chase the most expensive IPO in history after a +30% launch candle. Or learn from what Tesla already did. Reminder: I called Bitcoin at $16K, the top at $126K, and gold before it ran. Eight years of calls, all public. When I exit this market, I post it here first. Every move goes here too. Turn notifications on. You will understand why later.

winkle.

191,834 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

BREAKING: Newsom Squanders $27 BILLION on Homelessness - Where Did the Money Go? In a shocking revelation, Governor Gavin Newsom has allegedly wasted a staggering $27 billion meant for tackling California's homelessness crisis, according to latest HUD report that's raising more questions than answers. This colossal sum, enough to fund a small country's economy, seems to have vanished into thin air, leaving the streets just as crowded as before. We are now at the 20th year anniversary of Gavin Newsom’s 10 year plan to solve homelessness. Billions of dollars later and everything has only gotten worse. Progressive policy is making everything progressively worse. We The People of California are demanding accountability, questioning if this is just the tip of the iceberg in California's fiscal mismanagement. California needs DOGE. How embarrassing. What’s next? A run for President in 2028? God help us all. And NO We don’t want Kamala Harris a Governor!

BREAKING: Newsom Squanders $27 BILLION on Homelessness - Where Did the Money Go? In a shocking revelation, Governor Gavin Newsom has allegedly wasted a staggering $27 billion meant for tackling California's homelessness crisis, according to latest HUD report that's raising more questions than answers. This colossal sum, enough to fund a small country's economy, seems to have vanished into thin air, leaving the streets just as crowded as before. We are now at the 20th year anniversary of Gavin Newsom’s 10 year plan to solve homelessness. Billions of dollars later and everything has only gotten worse. Progressive policy is making everything progressively worse. We The People of California are demanding accountability, questioning if this is just the tip of the iceberg in California's fiscal mismanagement. California needs DOGE. How embarrassing. What’s next? A run for President in 2028? God help us all. And NO We don’t want Kamala Harris a Governor!

Darren Stallcup - World Peace Movement

252,885 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Bertha & Bonds 1⃣To kick off the Bertha initiative, we are moving forward with the initial order of BTC miners later this month, committing $250K–$350K USD in capital. This investment will fill approximately 30–35% of the Bertha facility, pushing $TITAN’s APR to around 20% and that’s just the beginning. 2⃣We are also introducing T-Bonds, a first-of-its-kind initiative on Cardano designed to unlock capital efficiency and accelerate ecosystem growth.👀 What Are T-Bonds? T-Bonds are like a loan from the community to the project. In return, you get a guaranteed return at bond maturity. Why This Works for TITAN? 15% of the total $TITAN supply is held in our treasury, reserved specifically to be sold gradually over time to fund investments as the token’s price grows. By combining our capital with the T-Bond raise, we aim to push the APR above 20-40%+. At that level, demand for $TITAN increases, driving the price higher. If the token price doubles as a result, our $TITAN investment treasury’s value grows from $1M to $2M. From there, we can gradually sell treasury-held $TITAN over a 12-month period, using the proceeds to repay bonds, expand mining capacity, and fund, new investments — all of which drive APR even higher and continue growing the treasury. Higher APR → More demand → Higher price → Larger treasury → More investments → Even higher APR. This is how we trigger the flywheel. Bond Terms: - 12% Fixed APR (pegged to USD value on the day), - 2.5% Bonus $TITAN airdrop, - 12-month term Bertha gets filled. Rewards go up. The flywheel spins. Bond Mint Date: -Thursday, July 24th–26th — 48 hours only. -This is a limited pilot with a hard cap. -Full details dropping next week. The success of the bonds isn’t critical for us it’s not something we need to do. We see it as an innovative concept that makes sense given our treasury model and adds value, but there's no pressure. Whether we scale with bonds or without them, the trajectory remains the same. Bonds simply accelerate the process and introduce a fresh mechanism into the ecosystem that could be tied to our ATLAS DeFi platform in the future. This is how TITANS win.

Bertha & Bonds 1⃣To kick off the Bertha initiative, we are moving forward with the initial order of BTC miners later this month, committing $250K–$350K USD in capital. This investment will fill approximately 30–35% of the Bertha facility, pushing $TITAN’s APR to around 20% and that’s just the beginning. 2⃣We are also introducing T-Bonds, a first-of-its-kind initiative on Cardano designed to unlock capital efficiency and accelerate ecosystem growth.👀 What Are T-Bonds? T-Bonds are like a loan from the community to the project. In return, you get a guaranteed return at bond maturity. Why This Works for TITAN? 15% of the total $TITAN supply is held in our treasury, reserved specifically to be sold gradually over time to fund investments as the token’s price grows. By combining our capital with the T-Bond raise, we aim to push the APR above 20-40%+. At that level, demand for $TITAN increases, driving the price higher. If the token price doubles as a result, our $TITAN investment treasury’s value grows from $1M to $2M. From there, we can gradually sell treasury-held $TITAN over a 12-month period, using the proceeds to repay bonds, expand mining capacity, and fund, new investments — all of which drive APR even higher and continue growing the treasury. Higher APR → More demand → Higher price → Larger treasury → More investments → Even higher APR. This is how we trigger the flywheel. Bond Terms: - 12% Fixed APR (pegged to USD value on the day), - 2.5% Bonus $TITAN airdrop, - 12-month term Bertha gets filled. Rewards go up. The flywheel spins. Bond Mint Date: -Thursday, July 24th–26th — 48 hours only. -This is a limited pilot with a hard cap. -Full details dropping next week. The success of the bonds isn’t critical for us it’s not something we need to do. We see it as an innovative concept that makes sense given our treasury model and adds value, but there's no pressure. Whether we scale with bonds or without them, the trajectory remains the same. Bonds simply accelerate the process and introduce a fresh mechanism into the ecosystem that could be tied to our ATLAS DeFi platform in the future. This is how TITANS win.

House Of Titans

15,443 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

BREAKING: Bill Ackman just IPO'd his hedge fund. He targeted $25 billion two years ago. He raised $5 billion yesterday. And the retail investors he spent two years courting on X didn't show up. Here's what actually happened, and why it matters for every investor who thinks following a famous name is a strategy. Wednesday, April 29. Bill Ackman rang the opening bell at the New York Stock Exchange. Two listed entities hit the market. Pershing Square USA (PSUS), the closed-end fund. Pershing Square Inc. (PS), the asset manager. PSUS priced at $50 a share. It opened at $42. It closed at $40.90. Down 18% on debut. One of the most famous hedge fund managers on the planet went public, and his fund lost nearly a fifth of its value in a single trading session. Now look at how the money actually came in. Of the $5 billion raised, $2.8 billion came from a private placement. Family offices took 30% of that. Pension funds took 25%. Insurance companies took 22%. Ultra-high-net-worth investors took 12%. Institutional investors accounted for over 85% of total orders. The remaining $2.2 billion came from a public offering of 44 million PSUS shares. Some of that was retail. Most of it was not. Ackman has 2 million followers on X. He spent two years marketing this fund as a way for regular people to access hedge fund returns at $50 a share. He even said it on CNBC the morning of the IPO: "Hedge funds are sort of known for managing money for rich people. And now we have the opportunity for someone with $50, could be a long-term shareholder. Usually, the retail gets cut massively back, the institutions are favored. We did the opposite." The retail audience he was talking to didn't believe him. The institutions did. Two years ago, the original target was $25 billion. Yesterday, the final number was $5 billion. That's an 80% downsize. This is one of the most watched investors in the world. He gets booked on every major financial network. He posts daily to millions of followers. He has been pitching this exact deal since 2024. And the deal still came in 80% smaller than planned. Here's the part nobody is connecting: The retail audience for hedge fund products is fundamentally different from the retail audience for personality content. Ackman built a following by being loud on X. Loud on takeovers. Loud on politics. Loud on universities. Loud on ETFs. Loud on macro calls. Followers love that. They follow. They reply. They retweet. But following someone is free. Wiring money into their closed-end fund at NAV with no performance fees and a fee structure most retail investors can't even read is an entirely different decision. The market just made that distinction for him. Now zoom out, because this is the structural lesson. The $2.8 billion private placement was wrapped up before retail even saw the deal. Family offices. Pension funds. Insurance companies. Sovereign wealth. These are the buyers who get the call before the IPO is announced. They get the term sheet. They negotiate. They commit. By the time the public sees the listing on a Wednesday morning, the institutions have already locked in their allocation. The retail investor sees the same news, gets the same prospectus, and reads the same ticker. Different game. Same name on the door. And then PSUS opened down 16% and closed down 18%. Every retail buyer who put in $50 at the IPO price was sitting on a $9 paper loss before lunch. The institutions had locked in better terms in the private placement. Same fund. Same manager. Two completely different starting positions. This is how the structure of capital markets actually works. Every. Single. Time. The brochure says democratization. The cap table says the institutions got there first. This is the same lesson the Blue Owl and BlackRock private credit stories taught us last year. When a famous money manager opens a vehicle to retail, the fine print and the fee structure and the timing of the allocation all favor the people who already have access. You can have a manager with no performance fee, with bonus shares attached, with two million social followers, and a stage on CNBC. The math of who gets in first and at what price is still the math. So what does this mean for you? It means a famous name on the cover is not a strategy. It means following an investor on X is not the same as being invested with them. It means the retail audience for entertaining finance content is enormous, and the retail audience for actually deploying capital into a complex product is not. The wealthy don't pay famous investors for personality. They build systems that don't depend on a single human being having a good year, or a good fund debut, or a good narrative on social media. Ackman's reputation got him on the front page. It didn't get the stock above its IPO price. The math always catches up. The personality doesn't change the math. Boring? Yes. Effective when a $25 billion vision becomes a $5 billion raise that opens down 18%? Also yes. This is exactly why we built Surmount. Automated, rules-based investment strategies. Built for the retail investor who doesn't want to bet a portfolio on whether a famous fund manager has a good debut:

Sensitive content

BREAKING: Bill Ackman just IPO'd his hedge fund. He targeted $25 billion two years ago. He raised $5 billion yesterday. And the retail investors he spent two years courting on X didn't show up. Here's what actually happened, and why it matters for every investor who thinks following a famous name is a strategy. Wednesday, April 29. Bill Ackman rang the opening bell at the New York Stock Exchange. Two listed entities hit the market. Pershing Square USA (PSUS), the closed-end fund. Pershing Square Inc. (PS), the asset manager. PSUS priced at $50 a share. It opened at $42. It closed at $40.90. Down 18% on debut. One of the most famous hedge fund managers on the planet went public, and his fund lost nearly a fifth of its value in a single trading session. Now look at how the money actually came in. Of the $5 billion raised, $2.8 billion came from a private placement. Family offices took 30% of that. Pension funds took 25%. Insurance companies took 22%. Ultra-high-net-worth investors took 12%. Institutional investors accounted for over 85% of total orders. The remaining $2.2 billion came from a public offering of 44 million PSUS shares. Some of that was retail. Most of it was not. Ackman has 2 million followers on X. He spent two years marketing this fund as a way for regular people to access hedge fund returns at $50 a share. He even said it on CNBC the morning of the IPO: "Hedge funds are sort of known for managing money for rich people. And now we have the opportunity for someone with $50, could be a long-term shareholder. Usually, the retail gets cut massively back, the institutions are favored. We did the opposite." The retail audience he was talking to didn't believe him. The institutions did. Two years ago, the original target was $25 billion. Yesterday, the final number was $5 billion. That's an 80% downsize. This is one of the most watched investors in the world. He gets booked on every major financial network. He posts daily to millions of followers. He has been pitching this exact deal since 2024. And the deal still came in 80% smaller than planned. Here's the part nobody is connecting: The retail audience for hedge fund products is fundamentally different from the retail audience for personality content. Ackman built a following by being loud on X. Loud on takeovers. Loud on politics. Loud on universities. Loud on ETFs. Loud on macro calls. Followers love that. They follow. They reply. They retweet. But following someone is free. Wiring money into their closed-end fund at NAV with no performance fees and a fee structure most retail investors can't even read is an entirely different decision. The market just made that distinction for him. Now zoom out, because this is the structural lesson. The $2.8 billion private placement was wrapped up before retail even saw the deal. Family offices. Pension funds. Insurance companies. Sovereign wealth. These are the buyers who get the call before the IPO is announced. They get the term sheet. They negotiate. They commit. By the time the public sees the listing on a Wednesday morning, the institutions have already locked in their allocation. The retail investor sees the same news, gets the same prospectus, and reads the same ticker. Different game. Same name on the door. And then PSUS opened down 16% and closed down 18%. Every retail buyer who put in $50 at the IPO price was sitting on a $9 paper loss before lunch. The institutions had locked in better terms in the private placement. Same fund. Same manager. Two completely different starting positions. This is how the structure of capital markets actually works. Every. Single. Time. The brochure says democratization. The cap table says the institutions got there first. This is the same lesson the Blue Owl and BlackRock private credit stories taught us last year. When a famous money manager opens a vehicle to retail, the fine print and the fee structure and the timing of the allocation all favor the people who already have access. You can have a manager with no performance fee, with bonus shares attached, with two million social followers, and a stage on CNBC. The math of who gets in first and at what price is still the math. So what does this mean for you? It means a famous name on the cover is not a strategy. It means following an investor on X is not the same as being invested with them. It means the retail audience for entertaining finance content is enormous, and the retail audience for actually deploying capital into a complex product is not. The wealthy don't pay famous investors for personality. They build systems that don't depend on a single human being having a good year, or a good fund debut, or a good narrative on social media. Ackman's reputation got him on the front page. It didn't get the stock above its IPO price. The math always catches up. The personality doesn't change the math. Boring? Yes. Effective when a $25 billion vision becomes a $5 billion raise that opens down 18%? Also yes. This is exactly why we built Surmount. Automated, rules-based investment strategies. Built for the retail investor who doesn't want to bet a portfolio on whether a famous fund manager has a good debut:

Logan Weaver

220,648 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

🚨 IT'S OFFICIAL: In a huge win, AAG Harmeet Dhillon has just FORCED PayPal into abolishing its DEI program and waiving fees for eligible American small businesses They were PRIORITIZING "minority businesses" Which is code for discriminating against white people. America First victory 🇺🇸 "DOJ Civil Rights is proud to announce a settlement with PayPal over its discriminatory 2020 program called its Economic Opportunity Fund, in which PayPal made $530 MILLION worth of capital available as loans on a preferential basis, only to minority owned businesses." "This of course discriminated against many other types of American businesses who are all entitled to the protection of the Equal Credit Protection Act, which we administer here at the Civil Rights Division." "As part of this settlement, PayPal has agreed to create a new small business initiative, and in that it's going to waive processing fees up to $30 million worth for $1 billion of transactions for businesses that are either veteran owned or that are certified by the farming, manufacturing, or technology." "I'm excited about this because a lot of American lenders continue to have these programs that may appear to be well meaning, but in the case of PayPal and many others, there's no finding a prior discrimination that would justify current discrimination against American small businesses or consumers." "And so the takeaway from this is that businesses in the United States that are engaged in lending cannot discriminate on the base of race, s*x, or other protected characteristics under our federal civil rights laws." "So small businesses out there that may qualify for this PayPal program, they should apply an American consumers that are aware of discriminatory lending practices like this by other American companies, banks, what have you, they should let us know because we'd like to do something about it."

🚨 IT'S OFFICIAL: In a huge win, AAG Harmeet Dhillon has just FORCED PayPal into abolishing its DEI program and waiving fees for eligible American small businesses They were PRIORITIZING "minority businesses" Which is code for discriminating against white people. America First victory 🇺🇸 "DOJ Civil Rights is proud to announce a settlement with PayPal over its discriminatory 2020 program called its Economic Opportunity Fund, in which PayPal made $530 MILLION worth of capital available as loans on a preferential basis, only to minority owned businesses." "This of course discriminated against many other types of American businesses who are all entitled to the protection of the Equal Credit Protection Act, which we administer here at the Civil Rights Division." "As part of this settlement, PayPal has agreed to create a new small business initiative, and in that it's going to waive processing fees up to $30 million worth for $1 billion of transactions for businesses that are either veteran owned or that are certified by the farming, manufacturing, or technology." "I'm excited about this because a lot of American lenders continue to have these programs that may appear to be well meaning, but in the case of PayPal and many others, there's no finding a prior discrimination that would justify current discrimination against American small businesses or consumers." "And so the takeaway from this is that businesses in the United States that are engaged in lending cannot discriminate on the base of race, s*x, or other protected characteristics under our federal civil rights laws." "So small businesses out there that may qualify for this PayPal program, they should apply an American consumers that are aware of discriminatory lending practices like this by other American companies, banks, what have you, they should let us know because we'd like to do something about it."

Eric Daugherty

49,059 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

What does Qullamaggie's account look like after the market has been rising for 2-3 months? "Yeah I’m a fund manager, 32 positons, but most of these like I’m up a lot on these, like 1/3 stuff like BABA no headache only have to look at like once per day, then maybe 1/3 are tiny micro cap pump stocks that I think can double/triple and most of these I have my stops at or above b/e so these are not headaches either, then there are some stuff I initiated today but that’s like 3-4 positions, but most of these are low energy positions. Like two months ago I had 5-6 positions and I’ve been slowly building, now I have a bunch of long/shorts, that’s always what happens when the market goes on a run like this, it could be a sign of an immediate pullback, bc my positions always peak before a pullback, around the 30 number, always been magical in that way for the past couple of years."

What does Qullamaggie's account look like after the market has been rising for 2-3 months? "Yeah I’m a fund manager, 32 positons, but most of these like I’m up a lot on these, like 1/3 stuff like BABA no headache only have to look at like once per day, then maybe 1/3 are tiny micro cap pump stocks that I think can double/triple and most of these I have my stops at or above b/e so these are not headaches either, then there are some stuff I initiated today but that’s like 3-4 positions, but most of these are low energy positions. Like two months ago I had 5-6 positions and I’ve been slowly building, now I have a bunch of long/shorts, that’s always what happens when the market goes on a run like this, it could be a sign of an immediate pullback, bc my positions always peak before a pullback, around the 30 number, always been magical in that way for the past couple of years."

Will Hu

16,575 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

"I used to be a bitcoiner. The transition to a new store of value only happens once every 3,000 years. That's the main prize -- just focus on that. But [security] is the criteria that ultimately convinced me to flip from Bitcoin to ETH." "I have a higher degree of certainty that Ethereum will be around longer [than Bitcoin]. The reason for that is because Bitcoin relies on proof-of-work, which is less efficient than proof-of-stake and doesn't scale with the value of the network. And as the block subsidy of Bitcoin halves every four years, it is increasingly becoming more and more reliant on transaction fees to fund the security budget paid to miners." "If you look at [Bitcoin's] security budget right now, about 0.6% of revenue to miners is transaction fees... The problem with that is if Bitcoin becomes 'digital gold', flips gold, and becomes a $30 trillion asset, but it only costs $10-20 billion to attack it, that's too asymmetric." "You want the security budget to scale with the market cap, similar to how countries spend a % of their GDP on defense. The more valuable something is, the more you need to spend to protect it." "Ethereum, with the Merge, migrated to proof-of-stake, which is fundamentally more secure because it's less reliant on transaction fees and it scales with the value of the network. If 1/3rd of ETH is staked and then you need 1/3rd of those ETH to censor the network, you're looking at roughly 10% of the total market cap as the cost to attack the network." "So if Ethereum flips Bitcoin and gold and becomes a $30 trillion asset, it'll cost ~$3 trillion to attack the Ethereum network versus Bitcoin at like $10 billion." "The other aspect here is that as AI hyperscalers invest more and more in AI, proof-of-work becomes increasingly vulnerable because the cost to attack the Bitcoin network is starting to look close to the quarterly CapEx these hyperscalers are spending on their data centers." Full interview on Bankless with Vivek Raman discussing the new Etherealize "Productive Money" report below.

"I used to be a bitcoiner. The transition to a new store of value only happens once every 3,000 years. That's the main prize -- just focus on that. But [security] is the criteria that ultimately convinced me to flip from Bitcoin to ETH." "I have a higher degree of certainty that Ethereum will be around longer [than Bitcoin]. The reason for that is because Bitcoin relies on proof-of-work, which is less efficient than proof-of-stake and doesn't scale with the value of the network. And as the block subsidy of Bitcoin halves every four years, it is increasingly becoming more and more reliant on transaction fees to fund the security budget paid to miners." "If you look at [Bitcoin's] security budget right now, about 0.6% of revenue to miners is transaction fees... The problem with that is if Bitcoin becomes 'digital gold', flips gold, and becomes a $30 trillion asset, but it only costs $10-20 billion to attack it, that's too asymmetric." "You want the security budget to scale with the market cap, similar to how countries spend a % of their GDP on defense. The more valuable something is, the more you need to spend to protect it." "Ethereum, with the Merge, migrated to proof-of-stake, which is fundamentally more secure because it's less reliant on transaction fees and it scales with the value of the network. If 1/3rd of ETH is staked and then you need 1/3rd of those ETH to censor the network, you're looking at roughly 10% of the total market cap as the cost to attack the network." "So if Ethereum flips Bitcoin and gold and becomes a $30 trillion asset, it'll cost ~$3 trillion to attack the Ethereum network versus Bitcoin at like $10 billion." "The other aspect here is that as AI hyperscalers invest more and more in AI, proof-of-work becomes increasingly vulnerable because the cost to attack the Bitcoin network is starting to look close to the quarterly CapEx these hyperscalers are spending on their data centers." Full interview on Bankless with Vivek Raman discussing the new Etherealize "Productive Money" report below.

Michael McGuiness

120,344 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten