正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

The COVID response was built around a genetic sequence most Americans never saw, could not examine, and were expected to trust. That sequence became the reference point for PCR tests, reported cases, new variants, vaccines, mandates, and emergency powers that reached into jobs, schools, hospitals, and homes. Jon Fleetwood...

61,077 次观看 • 24 天前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

REMINDER: The genome for SARS-CoV-2 is a "consensus sequence." Anybody who says the gene sequence for SARS2 is confirmed is *confused or lying.* "[The reality is that] nobody has the code of the pathogen..." "What they set for the control [for the PCR 'test'] is a consensus sequence, which [means] they took AI, they averaged out a section of the genome that they want as that test, and they set it for that. So it doesn't even exist in nature anywhere." This is a clip from a recent discussion between former medical coder and whistleblower Zowe Smith (Sheldon Diedericks) and retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (sashalatypova.substack.com "Due Diligence and Art"). Smith and Latypova discuss the many shortcomings of PCR "tests," as well as the fact that no genome for SARS-CoV-2 has ever been characterized—only a "consensus sequence," which Smith notes is developed when AI "average[s] out... a section of the genome that they want as a test." She adds, "it doesn't even exist in nature anywhere." Latypova confirms, "when they're saying, 'Oh, we have the COVID virus, the full genome...it's been sequenced. Look at all these papers.' [The reality is that] nobody has the code of the pathogen... Ralph Baric also wrote about it in his work all the time. So nobody has the pathogenic sequence." The pharma insider adds, "What they upload to GenBank is... averaged... And once it's averaged, it's no longer pathogenic anything. It's just a model. And then for PCR, [it] doesn't test the full genome. They do these, like, snippets, and then whatever snippet you wanna set it to, you will find it, and that's how they find... positive COVID. So all of this is total BS." Interestingly, Smith notes that when she worked with PCR in a lab at the Oregon Health and Science University "[she] realized that everything was controlled through EUA [Emergency Use Authorization] and the CDC, so there was no way to independently verify [the controls that were used]."

Sense Receptor

22,816 次观看 • 1 年前

💥Another doctor speaks out! During Covid, the hospitals were "KILLING FIELDS." The "unvaccinated" were treated like "DIRTY PLAGUE RATS" "100% [the 'unvaccinated'] were treated differently. You were treated as a dirty plague rat" "[After Covid] I think most people came to see that the hospitals were really killing fields" "After Covid, most people realized their doctors were there for themselves. Their doctors were more than happy to give them a toxic substance that would hurt them, like the Covid injection" This clip of Dr. James Miller (james miller), a trauma surgeon who worked at the WA hospital that got the first "covid" case in the U.S., is taken from a conversation with Alix Mayer (Alix Mayer) posted to YouTube on July 8, 2026. ---------------Partial transcription of clip--------------- "Absolutely, the vaccinated and unvaccinated were treated differently. As I was telling you before, they started just denying basic health services to unvaccinated people, which spurned not giving diabetes medicine. You can't go see your family doctor. "Now, you could still get emergency care in the ER, but 100% you were treated differently. You were treated as a dirty plague rat. And this was common in social media, but it was no different in the hospital. The medical community is no different. "I think part of why this is such a good time to talk about this is I think the Overton window has shifted on the discussion. I think all people have realized the medical care system did not meet their expectations during Covid. "I think most people thought before Covid when you go to the doctor, they're gonna help you out a bit and you're gonna get better and they're gonna wish you well. I think most people thought, when I'm really sick, I'm gonna go to the hospital, and they're gonna help me out a lot and do their best and get me well. After Covid, most people realized their doctors were there for themselves. Their doctors were more than happy to give them a toxic substance that would hurt them, like the Covid injection. "And I think most people came to see that the hospitals were really killing fields. And that shift has been pretty dramatic. I felt that shift in '22, when I was still working as a trauma surgeon. "Just this morning, I was running with a friend, and I was telling him that I was going to be on your show, and then I was going to talk about how the hospitals came killing fields. Oh, that totally happened to a friend of mine. And, we've been really good friends since I moved to Florida, and we're running buddies. "And he hadn't thought to talk about his friend who went to the hospital with actually no medical problems. He just needed his oxygen tank refilled. I mean, he had COPD that was chronic. But he just went to the hospital because his medical supply company was out of oxygen tanks. And they said, you can go to the hospital. So he went to the hospital to get an oxygen tank, and they said, why don't you wait in the ER while we'll get you your oxygen tanks. Feeling fine. They gave him a shot of something for who knows what. All of a sudden, he's in the ICU the next day, dead the next. And my friend who's a local pastor is like, Oh, yeah, that's what the hospitals were. It's just— It was common."

Sense Receptor

17,232 次观看 • 1 个月前

90% Inaccurate: Bombshell German Study Exposes the PCR Test Fraud That Locked Down the World A seismic new study out of Germany has just dropped a truth bomb on the entire COVID-19 narrative, and the implications are staggering. Remember the PCR tests? The ones that decided if you were locked down, forced into a quarantine hotel, or stripped of your freedoms? They were the cornerstone of the global pandemic response. Now, a major analysis of Germany's lab data—representing 90% of all tests—has conducted a simple, devastating check. They compared PCR "positive" results with actual blood tests for IgG antibodies to see who was truly infected. The finding is jaw-dropping: Only 10-14% of people who tested positive on a PCR test actually had antibodies proving a real infection. That means the tests were up to 90% INACCURATE. For every 10 "cases" reported, only 1 was likely real. This confirms what many warned about in 2020: inflated cycle thresholds (Ct) were creating a pandemic of false positives. A separate paper at the time stated that at 35 cycles, the false positive rate was 97%. They had the antibody data all along. They could have calibrated the tests and stopped the fear cycle. Instead, they chose to run millions of flawed tests, terrorizing the population with case numbers they knew were scientifically meaningless. Think of the consequences: ✅ Lockdowns based on false data. ✅ School closures over phantom cases. ✅ Vaccine mandates for a threat that was wildly overstated. And the ultimate irony? The one place you were guaranteed not to get a PCR test was in the COVID-19 vaccine clinical trials. They never tested participants to see if the vaccine actually stopped infection or transmission. The "science" we were told to "trust" wasn't just wrong—it was a catastrophic failure that collapsed the world economy and stripped us of our civil liberties. This isn't just a revelation. It's an indictment.

Camus

240,400 次观看 • 8 个月前

This part of my interview with Andrew Bridgen is one of the hardest conversations I’ve had on camera. We were talking about Covid policy and Andrew raised NICE Guideline 163 and what happened to vulnerable elderly people at the very start of the pandemic. He explains how elderly patients were moved out of hospitals to clear space for a wave of Covid cases that never came. Many of those people were in hospital for a reason. They were receiving ongoing care and medication. Instead, they were discharged without that medication and sent into care homes with midazolam and morphine. Andrew asks a question that was repeatedly raised in Parliament and never answered. Why would anyone give respiratory suppressants to people suspected of having a respiratory illness? He believes tens of thousands of vulnerable elderly people died breathlessly and were recorded as Covid deaths. And that this fear was then used to drive compliance and push the rollout of experimental vaccines. What struck me most is what happened when he raised these concerns internally. He was told there was no political appetite for these views. That he might be proven right one day. But that by continuing he was taking on the most powerful vested interests in the world and putting himself at personal risk. This clip is unedited and exactly as it was said. Watch it carefully. Sit with it. And ask yourself what it says about a system where questions like these are not answered but silenced.

Digby Furneaux

64,524 次观看 • 6 个月前

That’s when Jasmine Wright from Notus jumped in for one final ambush. Leavitt and Wright have a history…and Wright usually leaves the room with egg on her face. This time was no different. Wright tried tying Monarez’s firing to recent changes in Covid vaccine policy, hoping to corner Trump on whether he still supports vaccine access. “There was reporting some of the initial problems between RFK and the CDC Director stemmed from miscommunications or differences on vaccine policy.” “So I wonder if you could say whether or not the president believes that the Covid vaccine should be available and covered by insurance for all Americans regardless of age and pre-existing conditions?” Leavitt calmly flipped through her notes. She was ready and waiting for this. “What I will tell you is the FDA recently revoked the emergency youth authorizations for three Covid vaccinations, while simultaneously green lighting four new Covid-19 vaccines with 2025 and 2026 formulas.” Then she dismantled the entire media narrative in one sweep. “The reason for the revocation of that emergency youth authorization is because the Covid pandemic and the public health emergency is over but to correct the record because there has been a lot of misinformation on this, the FDA’s decision does not affect the availability of Covid vaccines for Americans who want them.” “We believe in individual choice. That’s the promise the president and the secretary have made and it’s a promise they have delivered on.” Crystal clear.

Vigilant Fox 🦊

155,175 次观看 • 11 个月前