Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

The creator has done incredible work. Please watch and note the following: ALL key cycles are recorded by Toyota Tech Stream. NOT just “events”. This has been verified by Lexus/Toyota Tech expert at Lexus Danvers. Karen bought her 2021 Lexus LX 570 in 2021 and had total of 1160...

RealNurseKim's profile picture

Nurse_Kim

18,005 subscribers

75,560 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

11 Yorum

Falyn Nicole profil fotoğrafı
Falyn Nicole2 yıl önce

@DoctorTurtleboy @JohnDePetroshow @VinniePolitan @Angenette5 @YellowCottageT @CoffindafferFBI @BostonDefender @Leopardo8 @MassStatePolice I’ll forever believe this was key cycle 1162

Nick West 🇺🇦 profil fotoğrafı
Nick West 🇺🇦2 yıl önce

@DoctorTurtleboy @JohnDePetroshow @VinniePolitan @Angenette5 @YellowCottageT @CoffindafferFBI @BostonDefender @Leopardo8 @MassStatePolice Adding to that, where did the 36 miles come from between 01162 and 01164? Did Proctor and Bukhenik take it for a spin? Were they trying to "create" something, some trigger events maybe? I don't trust that base key cycle 01164 at all.

jukeboxgrad profil fotoğrafı
jukeboxgrad2 yıl önce

@DoctorTurtleboy @JohnDePetroshow @VinniePolitan @Angenette5 @YellowCottageT @CoffindafferFBI @BostonDefender @Leopardo8 @MassStatePolice The video correctly makes the main point, which is that key cycle 62, containing suspicious rapid reverse events, definitely took place after the car was seized.

CB profil fotoğrafı
CB2 yıl önce

@DoctorTurtleboy @JohnDePetroshow @VinniePolitan @Angenette5 @YellowCottageT @CoffindafferFBI @BostonDefender @Leopardo8 @MassStatePolice I've been trying to explain this to people and they just don't want to get it.

Max Fortune profil fotoğrafı
Max Fortune2 yıl önce

@DoctorTurtleboy @JohnDePetroshow @VinniePolitan @Angenette5 @YellowCottageT @CoffindafferFBI @BostonDefender @Leopardo8 @MassStatePolice @Bederowlaw this is the entire case. Proves she did not go in reverse at 24 mph at 34 Fairview

Dianne S profil fotoğrafı
Dianne S2 yıl önce

@Leopardo8 @DoctorTurtleboy @JohnDePetroshow @VinniePolitan @Angenette5 @YellowCottageT @CoffindafferFBI @BostonDefender @MassStatePolice I’m so curious as to why the snow outline existed BEFORE the car was pulled into the sallyport. It stuck out as huge to me, but it wS never mentioned by the defense.

Max Fortune profil fotoğrafı
Max Fortune2 yıl önce

@DoctorTurtleboy @JohnDePetroshow @VinniePolitan @Angenette5 @YellowCottageT @CoffindafferFBI @BostonDefender @Leopardo8 @MassStatePolice This is the entire case. Game over

Barney Pelty profil fotoğrafı
Barney Pelty2 yıl önce

@Leopardo8 @DoctorTurtleboy @JohnDePetroshow @VinniePolitan @Angenette5 @YellowCottageT @CoffindafferFBI @BostonDefender @MassStatePolice This is based on the knowledge presented at trial. What if Tpr Paul is responsible for more than one key cycle? Based on the snow outline and re-wrapping the Lexus in caution tape, MSP/CPD could be responsible for more than one key cycle.

Richard D. Vetstein, Esq. profil fotoğrafı
Richard D. Vetstein, Esq.2 yıl önce

@DoctorTurtleboy @JohnDePetroshow @VinniePolitan @Angenette5 @YellowCottageT @CoffindafferFBI @BostonDefender @Leopardo8 @MassStatePolice That Lexus model/year has keyless ignition. What impact does that have on Trp. Paul's analysis?

Edin profil fotoğrafı
Edin2 yıl önce

@DoctorTurtleboy @JohnDePetroshow @VinniePolitan @Angenette5 @YellowCottageT @CoffindafferFBI @BostonDefender @Leopardo8 @MassStatePolice Is this the same creator who does the 3D rendering of peoples testimonies, if so she does a good one showing how John should be injured.

Nurse_Kim profil fotoğrafı
Nurse_Kim2 yıl önce

@DoctorTurtleboy @JohnDePetroshow @VinniePolitan @Angenette5 @YellowCottageT @CoffindafferFBI @BostonDefender @Leopardo8 @MassStatePolice Yes!

Benzer Videolar

Lally’s opening statement: It has been opined that, around 12:45 am, Karen’s vehicle was in front of 34 Fairview and traveled 60 ft in reverse at approximately 24.2mph and she struck John O’Keefe. How? Karen is confirmed to be home via a voicemail she left on John’s phone at 12:41am. Jen McCabe also calls and texts John several times from 12:41am until 12:45am where she then stated she observed the black suv pull away and leave. What is the scientific definition of “around 12:45 in the morning?” (Fairview to Meadows Ave. is a 6 min drive on a clear day/night….Karen would have left Fairview by 12:30ish that night) #justiceforjohnokeefe #freekarenread
0:29

Lally’s opening statement: It has been opined that, around 12:45 am, Karen’s vehicle was in front of 34 Fairview and traveled 60 ft in reverse at approximately 24.2mph and she struck John O’Keefe. How? Karen is confirmed to be home via a voicemail she left on John’s phone at 12:41am. Jen McCabe also calls and texts John several times from 12:41am until 12:45am where she then stated she observed the black suv pull away and leave. What is the scientific definition of “around 12:45 in the morning?” (Fairview to Meadows Ave. is a 6 min drive on a clear day/night….Karen would have left Fairview by 12:30ish that night) #justiceforjohnokeefe #freekarenread

lala

322,244 görüntüleme • 2 yıl önce

In the process of defending Colin Albert, Judge Cannone exonerated #KarenRead, and her own ruling proves Karen couldn’t have killed John O’Keefe. She claims Colin’s “screenshot” alibi removes his opportunity to have killed John. Well that means Karen connecting to the WiFi at 1 Meadows Ave at 12:36am also proves she couldn’t have killed John either, warranting dismissal of the charges. Specifically, Judge Beverly Cannone validated Colin Albert’s alibi, stating: “There is no evidence that [he] was at 34 Fairview when the defendant and Mr. O’Keefe arrived at the home.” “Evidence at the first trial was that Colin Albert had already been picked up by the time O’Keefe and the defendant arrived at 34 Fairview.” She’s apparently playing “fact finder” (the jury’s role) now to deny more constitutional rights of Karen Read’s, and preclude her from raising a third party culprit defense involving Colin Albert based on nothing more than some flimsy, unverifiable, metadata-stripped screenshots of alleged “text messages” as an alibi, provided 2 years after the fact by un-credible witnesses. Well, guess what Beverly? I’d say you just provided excellent grounds for a subsequent Motion to Dismiss, per the Commonwealth’s evidence proving the defendant’s alibi—that Karen Read was back home and connected to the WiFi at 1 Meadows Ave by 12:36am. Not only is this far more credible and reliable alibi evidence (data don’t lie) than a purported screenshot, but the Commonwealth’s own timeline and the evidentiary timeline make it physically impossible for Karen Read to have killed John O’Keefe—she was nowhere near John nor 34 Fairview during the time that he was killed, and thus categorically had no opportunity to do so. In Karen’s case, not only is the evidence of opportunity wholly inadequate, but digital forensic data evidence from both the WiFi system at 1 Meadows Ave and Karen Read’s cellphone unequivocally prove she did not and could not have killed John O’Keefe. Dismiss the case and lock this disgraceful, tyrannical Judge up! #KarenReadTrial #CantonCoverup #FreeKarenRead
0:25

In the process of defending Colin Albert, Judge Cannone exonerated #KarenRead, and her own ruling proves Karen couldn’t have killed John O’Keefe. She claims Colin’s “screenshot” alibi removes his opportunity to have killed John. Well that means Karen connecting to the WiFi at 1 Meadows Ave at 12:36am also proves she couldn’t have killed John either, warranting dismissal of the charges. Specifically, Judge Beverly Cannone validated Colin Albert’s alibi, stating: “There is no evidence that [he] was at 34 Fairview when the defendant and Mr. O’Keefe arrived at the home.” “Evidence at the first trial was that Colin Albert had already been picked up by the time O’Keefe and the defendant arrived at 34 Fairview.” She’s apparently playing “fact finder” (the jury’s role) now to deny more constitutional rights of Karen Read’s, and preclude her from raising a third party culprit defense involving Colin Albert based on nothing more than some flimsy, unverifiable, metadata-stripped screenshots of alleged “text messages” as an alibi, provided 2 years after the fact by un-credible witnesses. Well, guess what Beverly? I’d say you just provided excellent grounds for a subsequent Motion to Dismiss, per the Commonwealth’s evidence proving the defendant’s alibi—that Karen Read was back home and connected to the WiFi at 1 Meadows Ave by 12:36am. Not only is this far more credible and reliable alibi evidence (data don’t lie) than a purported screenshot, but the Commonwealth’s own timeline and the evidentiary timeline make it physically impossible for Karen Read to have killed John O’Keefe—she was nowhere near John nor 34 Fairview during the time that he was killed, and thus categorically had no opportunity to do so. In Karen’s case, not only is the evidence of opportunity wholly inadequate, but digital forensic data evidence from both the WiFi system at 1 Meadows Ave and Karen Read’s cellphone unequivocally prove she did not and could not have killed John O’Keefe. Dismiss the case and lock this disgraceful, tyrannical Judge up! #KarenReadTrial #CantonCoverup #FreeKarenRead

Olivia

101,136 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

FKR continues to push the narrative that Karen Read’s passenger side taillight was intact in the picture attached and simply covered by snow. But thankfully Karen’s own father is here to help clear things up for them: This image is from a wellness check that took place at 1 Meadows around 8 AM on the morning of January 29, 2022. And here’s Bill Read himself confirming that yes, Karen’s taillight was already broken while her car was parked in the driveway at 1 Meadows WELL BEFORE the Massachusetts State Police ever took custody of her Lexus. ARCCA has stated that Karen Read bumping John O’Keefe’s vehicle around 5AM that morning at the speed she did would NOT have caused that damage to her taillight. So when did the damage occur? Facts matter. Just stop it.
0:59

FKR continues to push the narrative that Karen Read’s passenger side taillight was intact in the picture attached and simply covered by snow. But thankfully Karen’s own father is here to help clear things up for them: This image is from a wellness check that took place at 1 Meadows around 8 AM on the morning of January 29, 2022. And here’s Bill Read himself confirming that yes, Karen’s taillight was already broken while her car was parked in the driveway at 1 Meadows WELL BEFORE the Massachusetts State Police ever took custody of her Lexus. ARCCA has stated that Karen Read bumping John O’Keefe’s vehicle around 5AM that morning at the speed she did would NOT have caused that damage to her taillight. So when did the damage occur? Facts matter. Just stop it.

Jamz

30,271 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Seeing Lt. Mike Lank at the Canton High hockey game reminded me of one of those little details from the Karen Read trial that somehow never gets less strange the more you look at it. Jennifer McCabe testified that on the morning of January 30th she left 1 Meadows, drove to Mike Lank’s house on Oakdale, and only went past 34 Fairview because that’s the normal way to get there. And to be fair, from 1 Meadows to Oakdale, yes… you could pass Fairview depending on the route. No problem there. Except for one small issue. Her Life360 data shows she didn’t go straight from 1 Meadows to Lank’s. It shows she went from 1 Meadows to Country Lane (her house) then she left her house and drove past 34 Fairview, then to Oakdale (Lank’s) Once you go to Country Lane first, driving past Fairview is no longer the natural route to Oakdale. Not even close. You would have to go out of your way to go by 34 Fairview. But in court, the explanation was simple…“We drove by Fairview because that’s the way we go to Lank’s.” Right. That works… only if you ignore the part where the phone data shows you went home first. Just one of those little coincidences in this case where the phones keep telling one story…and the witnesses keep telling another. But sure. Totally normal morning. Nothing to see here.
2:20

Seeing Lt. Mike Lank at the Canton High hockey game reminded me of one of those little details from the Karen Read trial that somehow never gets less strange the more you look at it. Jennifer McCabe testified that on the morning of January 30th she left 1 Meadows, drove to Mike Lank’s house on Oakdale, and only went past 34 Fairview because that’s the normal way to get there. And to be fair, from 1 Meadows to Oakdale, yes… you could pass Fairview depending on the route. No problem there. Except for one small issue. Her Life360 data shows she didn’t go straight from 1 Meadows to Lank’s. It shows she went from 1 Meadows to Country Lane (her house) then she left her house and drove past 34 Fairview, then to Oakdale (Lank’s) Once you go to Country Lane first, driving past Fairview is no longer the natural route to Oakdale. Not even close. You would have to go out of your way to go by 34 Fairview. But in court, the explanation was simple…“We drove by Fairview because that’s the way we go to Lank’s.” Right. That works… only if you ignore the part where the phone data shows you went home first. Just one of those little coincidences in this case where the phones keep telling one story…and the witnesses keep telling another. But sure. Totally normal morning. Nothing to see here.

Dixie Normus

24,482 görüntüleme • 4 ay önce

I need to make this abundantly clear, after following this case now since August 2023, I can see how this wretched diabolical psychopath operates. She is starting to form a brand new narrative for who is responsible for John’s death. Here are the former targets of Read’s narrative to blame someone else for what she did. 1) It was a plow. 2)It was Chloe, the Albert’s dog 3) It was Jennifer McCabe 4) It was Colin Albert 5) It was Brian Albert 6)It was all 3 of these people. The following people are part of the conspiracy according to Karen, and are covering up what Jenn, Colin, Brian A, & Brian H did 📌Brian Albert Jr. 📌Julie Nagel 📌Sarah Levinson 📌Allie McCabe 📌Julie Albert 📌The EMT’s on the scene the morning John was found 📌The Canton PD 📌Mass State Police 📌Ian Whiffin: an expert in digital forensics who currently serves as a Senior Technical Product Manager at Cellebrite. 📌Dr. Jessica Hyde: a high-profile digital forensics examiner, consultant, and educator. *It’s important to note that any friends & family of the aforementioned, would be looked upon by Read & her attorneys of being complicit in the conspiracy if they were to speak out to support their family and/or friends. THERE IS NOT ONE SHRED OF EVIDENCE THAT ANYONE MENTIONED ABOVE, HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE DEATH OF JOHN O’KEEFE. Here are the basic facts and evidence that point directly to Karen Read. The digital data shows: 📌Karen backed her SUV up going 24 MPH, with the gas pedal pressed at 75% throttle. What that means is her gas pedal was almost completely pressed to the floor of the vehicle. 📌 Read's 2021 Lexus LX 570 SUV recorded a "trigger event" when put in reverse, corresponding to the time of the fatal strike of John O’Keefe. O'Keefe's iPhone, including Health app steps, Doppler data, and battery temperature, forensic experts testified that the phone's last recorded movement stopped at 12:32 a.m., right around the same time the SUV was in reverse. 📌A Canton Police Department cruiser responding to check on John O’Keefe's niece and nephew captured footage of Karen Read’s broken tail light at 8:23 a.m.on January 29, 2022, via the vehicle camera on law enforcement’s vehicle. 📌 Karen relayed through the intermediary to the blogger, that her taillight was already broken at 5:08 AM. 📌Pieces of her tail light were found at the scene (34 Fairview) 📌 microscopic pieces of tail light were found embedded in John’s clothing. 📌 Karen herself told several first responders, and witnesses testified during the trial, that Karen Read made statements at the scene admitting she hit John O’Keefe. 📌 Karen told investigators the afternoon of the horrific event, that John did not go into the house. Since then, Karen’s version of whether John went into the home at 34 Fairview has changed multiple times. Presently her story is that he did go into the home. (He didn’t) ‼️This is not a complicated case, this is a woman who was enraged, drunk, and in a fit of rage, backed her vehicle up into John, struck him, and left him to die in the cold. Instead of taking accountability, she is now trying to blame his death on John’s own friends, to avoid taking any accountability for what she did. She has destroyed people’s, including at the time, an 18 year old young man named Colin albert, who was not even inside the home by the time Karen had arrived. ‼️ given all of this evidence, if you still believe that Karen Read is innocent, then you are as dumb as a bag of damn rocks! 🚨 that brings me back to the original purpose of this post. She is now trying to put the blame on Michael Proctor. Michael Proctor‘s horrific, disgusting, and despicable text messages are just that, but they have nothing to do with Karen Read herself, or his investigation of her case. ‼️The FBI went through Michael Proctor‘s phone & found ZERO evidence of a coverup or a conspiracy. Read is a manipulative, lying, narcissist, & needs to be held accountable for the death of John O’Keefe.
0:24

I need to make this abundantly clear, after following this case now since August 2023, I can see how this wretched diabolical psychopath operates. She is starting to form a brand new narrative for who is responsible for John’s death. Here are the former targets of Read’s narrative to blame someone else for what she did. 1) It was a plow. 2)It was Chloe, the Albert’s dog 3) It was Jennifer McCabe 4) It was Colin Albert 5) It was Brian Albert 6)It was all 3 of these people. The following people are part of the conspiracy according to Karen, and are covering up what Jenn, Colin, Brian A, & Brian H did 📌Brian Albert Jr. 📌Julie Nagel 📌Sarah Levinson 📌Allie McCabe 📌Julie Albert 📌The EMT’s on the scene the morning John was found 📌The Canton PD 📌Mass State Police 📌Ian Whiffin: an expert in digital forensics who currently serves as a Senior Technical Product Manager at Cellebrite. 📌Dr. Jessica Hyde: a high-profile digital forensics examiner, consultant, and educator. *It’s important to note that any friends & family of the aforementioned, would be looked upon by Read & her attorneys of being complicit in the conspiracy if they were to speak out to support their family and/or friends. THERE IS NOT ONE SHRED OF EVIDENCE THAT ANYONE MENTIONED ABOVE, HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE DEATH OF JOHN O’KEEFE. Here are the basic facts and evidence that point directly to Karen Read. The digital data shows: 📌Karen backed her SUV up going 24 MPH, with the gas pedal pressed at 75% throttle. What that means is her gas pedal was almost completely pressed to the floor of the vehicle. 📌 Read's 2021 Lexus LX 570 SUV recorded a "trigger event" when put in reverse, corresponding to the time of the fatal strike of John O’Keefe. O'Keefe's iPhone, including Health app steps, Doppler data, and battery temperature, forensic experts testified that the phone's last recorded movement stopped at 12:32 a.m., right around the same time the SUV was in reverse. 📌A Canton Police Department cruiser responding to check on John O’Keefe's niece and nephew captured footage of Karen Read’s broken tail light at 8:23 a.m.on January 29, 2022, via the vehicle camera on law enforcement’s vehicle. 📌 Karen relayed through the intermediary to the blogger, that her taillight was already broken at 5:08 AM. 📌Pieces of her tail light were found at the scene (34 Fairview) 📌 microscopic pieces of tail light were found embedded in John’s clothing. 📌 Karen herself told several first responders, and witnesses testified during the trial, that Karen Read made statements at the scene admitting she hit John O’Keefe. 📌 Karen told investigators the afternoon of the horrific event, that John did not go into the house. Since then, Karen’s version of whether John went into the home at 34 Fairview has changed multiple times. Presently her story is that he did go into the home. (He didn’t) ‼️This is not a complicated case, this is a woman who was enraged, drunk, and in a fit of rage, backed her vehicle up into John, struck him, and left him to die in the cold. Instead of taking accountability, she is now trying to blame his death on John’s own friends, to avoid taking any accountability for what she did. She has destroyed people’s, including at the time, an 18 year old young man named Colin albert, who was not even inside the home by the time Karen had arrived. ‼️ given all of this evidence, if you still believe that Karen Read is innocent, then you are as dumb as a bag of damn rocks! 🚨 that brings me back to the original purpose of this post. She is now trying to put the blame on Michael Proctor. Michael Proctor‘s horrific, disgusting, and despicable text messages are just that, but they have nothing to do with Karen Read herself, or his investigation of her case. ‼️The FBI went through Michael Proctor‘s phone & found ZERO evidence of a coverup or a conspiracy. Read is a manipulative, lying, narcissist, & needs to be held accountable for the death of John O’Keefe.

Andie (Albert) Dufrense

35,003 görüntüleme • 1 ay önce

BREAKING NEWS 🚨🚨🚨: "We think [John O'Keefe] died around 12:25 or 12:30am [on 1/29/22]." - Karen Read Hank Brennan just played multiple new, never-before-seen, Karen Clips in the John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial. Karen admitted she knew John was dead by 12:30am, which is the just 2 minutes before Karen's car shows a backup event and John's phone then stopped moving on a lawn (while Karen was drunk driving with a BAC between 0.14-0.28, which is 2-4 times the legal limit). That's it, it's over. Only Karen was around John at 12:30am on 1/29/22 (and all the data and evidence proves it). Hank Brennan may have just won this case (using Karen's own, secret, words to a film crew). Oh my word. In other clips, Karen admitted to making a three point turn at 12:24am (confirmed by Karen's Lexus data) before sitting with John outside Fairview until roughly 12:31am (and also to arriving back at John's home before 12:41am that morning). Watch live as testimony continues with exclusive Karen Cam footage, and chat with the towel friends, here -
2:53

BREAKING NEWS 🚨🚨🚨: "We think [John O'Keefe] died around 12:25 or 12:30am [on 1/29/22]." - Karen Read Hank Brennan just played multiple new, never-before-seen, Karen Clips in the John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial. Karen admitted she knew John was dead by 12:30am, which is the just 2 minutes before Karen's car shows a backup event and John's phone then stopped moving on a lawn (while Karen was drunk driving with a BAC between 0.14-0.28, which is 2-4 times the legal limit). That's it, it's over. Only Karen was around John at 12:30am on 1/29/22 (and all the data and evidence proves it). Hank Brennan may have just won this case (using Karen's own, secret, words to a film crew). Oh my word. In other clips, Karen admitted to making a three point turn at 12:24am (confirmed by Karen's Lexus data) before sitting with John outside Fairview until roughly 12:31am (and also to arriving back at John's home before 12:41am that morning). Watch live as testimony continues with exclusive Karen Cam footage, and chat with the towel friends, here -

Grant Smith Ellis

50,984 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Yesterday Karen Read told the jury—and the world—that she confessed to her lawyer. She also reversed her vehicle at 74% throttle, accelerating to 24 mph and backing up over 80 feet—just seconds before John stopped moving forever. She left her taillight at the scene and embedded in John O’Keefe’s clothes. His DNA is on the back of her SUV. She told Kerry Roberts at 5 a.m. that John was dead because a plow hit him. She told John’s niece he was hit by a plow at 4:30 a.m. His hair is on the back of her SUV. She knew exactly where his body was in pitch black and blinding snow—he was covered in it. She told everyone at the scene that she hit him. Karen Read had 9 vodka drinks before getting behind the wheel of that SUV. And yet, there are still people claiming the Commonwealth didn’t prove its case. At this point, it’s full-on twilight zone.
0:45

Yesterday Karen Read told the jury—and the world—that she confessed to her lawyer. She also reversed her vehicle at 74% throttle, accelerating to 24 mph and backing up over 80 feet—just seconds before John stopped moving forever. She left her taillight at the scene and embedded in John O’Keefe’s clothes. His DNA is on the back of her SUV. She told Kerry Roberts at 5 a.m. that John was dead because a plow hit him. She told John’s niece he was hit by a plow at 4:30 a.m. His hair is on the back of her SUV. She knew exactly where his body was in pitch black and blinding snow—he was covered in it. She told everyone at the scene that she hit him. Karen Read had 9 vodka drinks before getting behind the wheel of that SUV. And yet, there are still people claiming the Commonwealth didn’t prove its case. At this point, it’s full-on twilight zone.

Mama Llama

36,791 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Karen Read's theory about what happened to John O'Keefe has never changed. In her new interview with Rotten Mango, Karen states exactly what she has all along: She dropped John off at 34 Fairview and saw him walk up to the breezeway. She goes home, falls asleep and finds him at 6:03am in the snow on the front lawn of 34 Fairview. She further goes on to say that based on his injuries, and with all of the pathologists (and all doctors, too) from both trials agree, that John's injuries are not the typical for a vehicle impact. Further, they align more with being struck or falling on something at the back of his head. John O'Keefe was not hit by a vehicle... because his body says so.
1:01

Karen Read's theory about what happened to John O'Keefe has never changed. In her new interview with Rotten Mango, Karen states exactly what she has all along: She dropped John off at 34 Fairview and saw him walk up to the breezeway. She goes home, falls asleep and finds him at 6:03am in the snow on the front lawn of 34 Fairview. She further goes on to say that based on his injuries, and with all of the pathologists (and all doctors, too) from both trials agree, that John's injuries are not the typical for a vehicle impact. Further, they align more with being struck or falling on something at the back of his head. John O'Keefe was not hit by a vehicle... because his body says so.

BoozeyBeauty

35,062 görüntüleme • 6 ay önce

Yesterday, Ian Whiffin confirmed what Richard Green/the #KarenRead defense said in Trial 1, thus confirming that John O’Keefe arrived at 34 Fairview 3 minutes & 1 second before the Commonwealth’s GPS/location data points show: “[The monotonic clock] is not a clock that can be trusted to see when events occur.” Only the display time is accurate when determining when something actually happened. “All activity is related to that (the display) clock.” “You have to take the values that the monotonic clock provides and add or subtract different values, which are essentially offsets, to get the correct time.” That’s a major problem for the Commonwealth — because Whiffin’s entire Waze location analysis is built on the MONOTONIC TIMESTAMPS! And somehow, neither Whiffin nor Hank Brennan seems to grasp what just happened: They accidentally proved the defense’s theory! Specifically, because the Waze app runs on monotonic time programming and not the display time programming, the timestamps associated with the cached locations from Waze on John’s iPhone are 3 minutes and 1 second fast/ahead, or have a 181 second offset (see attached evidence exhibit from trial 1 with the specific conversions). This means that John O’Keefe arrived at 34 Fairview at approximately 12:21:37am, give or take, and not at 12:24:38am as the Commonwealth asserts, as Waze is based off of the monotonic timestamps, not the display clock timestamps. Consequently, this means John arrives at 34 Fairview BEFORE his Apple Health data recorded him taking flights of stairs, which didn’t first occur until 12:22:14am, therefore meaning that approximately 40 seconds after arriving at the house, John O’Keefe first began climbing some stairs. It suddenly becomes a lot harder for the Commonwealth to discredit the reliability of Apple Health data confirming John went inside the house when his location data also put him there. Why would the Commonwealth rely on the wrong timestamps when conducting their 15+ months after the fact GPS/location data analysis? Because it was right after the defense had first made public John O’Keefe’s Apple Health data showing flights of stairs climbed upon John’s arrival at 34 Fairview—thus establishing that he did in fact go inside the house. They needed to keep John out of the house to have any case, so they opted for discrediting the Apple Health data they so regularly rely upon in their criminal prosecutions, while deliberately only looking at John’s phone location data sourced from the one app that uses monotonic time programming without converting those timestamps to the display time (or subtracting the 3 mins. 1 second offset). By exploiting the incorrect monotonic timestamps of the cached Waze location data, the Commonwealth was able to claim that John’s phone location data showed he’d not yet arrived at 34 Fairview by the time his Apple Health data showed him climbing flights of stairs inside the house. To convert any of John O’Keefe’s Waze data that Whiffin presented into real time, you need to subtract 3 full minutes from each monotonic timestamp. So when Whiffin bizarrely testified that John was climbing stairs while driving down Oakdale at 12:22 AM? Yeah — that actually happened at 12:19 AM. And when he claimed Karen pulled up to 34 Fairview at 12:24 AM? That was really at 12:21 AM. Both times perfectly aligned with the Defense’s timeline. Not the Commonwealth’s. And Hank Brennan? Well, he’s got his expert, Ian Whiffin, casually confirming that John O’Keefe was walking into 34 Fairview at 12:21 AM, and climbing stairs at 12:22 AM. At this point, you really have to ask: Are the Commonwealth’s witnesses planning to leave anything for the Defense to rebut? Or are they just going to blow up their own case — one by one? Because this? This is getting insane. #IanWhiffin #Cellebrite #NorfolkCounty #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe
1:36

Yesterday, Ian Whiffin confirmed what Richard Green/the #KarenRead defense said in Trial 1, thus confirming that John O’Keefe arrived at 34 Fairview 3 minutes & 1 second before the Commonwealth’s GPS/location data points show: “[The monotonic clock] is not a clock that can be trusted to see when events occur.” Only the display time is accurate when determining when something actually happened. “All activity is related to that (the display) clock.” “You have to take the values that the monotonic clock provides and add or subtract different values, which are essentially offsets, to get the correct time.” That’s a major problem for the Commonwealth — because Whiffin’s entire Waze location analysis is built on the MONOTONIC TIMESTAMPS! And somehow, neither Whiffin nor Hank Brennan seems to grasp what just happened: They accidentally proved the defense’s theory! Specifically, because the Waze app runs on monotonic time programming and not the display time programming, the timestamps associated with the cached locations from Waze on John’s iPhone are 3 minutes and 1 second fast/ahead, or have a 181 second offset (see attached evidence exhibit from trial 1 with the specific conversions). This means that John O’Keefe arrived at 34 Fairview at approximately 12:21:37am, give or take, and not at 12:24:38am as the Commonwealth asserts, as Waze is based off of the monotonic timestamps, not the display clock timestamps. Consequently, this means John arrives at 34 Fairview BEFORE his Apple Health data recorded him taking flights of stairs, which didn’t first occur until 12:22:14am, therefore meaning that approximately 40 seconds after arriving at the house, John O’Keefe first began climbing some stairs. It suddenly becomes a lot harder for the Commonwealth to discredit the reliability of Apple Health data confirming John went inside the house when his location data also put him there. Why would the Commonwealth rely on the wrong timestamps when conducting their 15+ months after the fact GPS/location data analysis? Because it was right after the defense had first made public John O’Keefe’s Apple Health data showing flights of stairs climbed upon John’s arrival at 34 Fairview—thus establishing that he did in fact go inside the house. They needed to keep John out of the house to have any case, so they opted for discrediting the Apple Health data they so regularly rely upon in their criminal prosecutions, while deliberately only looking at John’s phone location data sourced from the one app that uses monotonic time programming without converting those timestamps to the display time (or subtracting the 3 mins. 1 second offset). By exploiting the incorrect monotonic timestamps of the cached Waze location data, the Commonwealth was able to claim that John’s phone location data showed he’d not yet arrived at 34 Fairview by the time his Apple Health data showed him climbing flights of stairs inside the house. To convert any of John O’Keefe’s Waze data that Whiffin presented into real time, you need to subtract 3 full minutes from each monotonic timestamp. So when Whiffin bizarrely testified that John was climbing stairs while driving down Oakdale at 12:22 AM? Yeah — that actually happened at 12:19 AM. And when he claimed Karen pulled up to 34 Fairview at 12:24 AM? That was really at 12:21 AM. Both times perfectly aligned with the Defense’s timeline. Not the Commonwealth’s. And Hank Brennan? Well, he’s got his expert, Ian Whiffin, casually confirming that John O’Keefe was walking into 34 Fairview at 12:21 AM, and climbing stairs at 12:22 AM. At this point, you really have to ask: Are the Commonwealth’s witnesses planning to leave anything for the Defense to rebut? Or are they just going to blow up their own case — one by one? Because this? This is getting insane. #IanWhiffin #Cellebrite #NorfolkCounty #KarenReadTrial #KarenReadTrial2 #FreeKarenRead #JusticeForJohnOKeefe

Olivia

179,619 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

NEW: I have "color-enhanced" all of the new footage from the exterior Canton Police Department Sallyport video between 5:36:06PM - 5:43:55PM on 1/29/22 (the day of John O'Keefe's death). Multiple pieces of footage are missing at crucial moments (as are multiple pieces of footage from the interior Sallyport camera at the same time). Timeline: 5:35:06PM - Exterior footage begins. 5:35:12PM - 5:35:22PM - Footage missing from exterior Sallyport camera. 5:35:44PM - 5:36:03PM - Footage missing from exterior Sallyport camera. 5:36:03PM - 5:35:16PM - Karen Read's Lexus headlights shine against the outside of the Sallyport wall for the first time. 5:36:16PM - 5:36:26PM - Footage missing from exterior Sallyport camera. 5:36:26PM - 5:36:43PM - Karen's Lexus is pulled into Canton PD Sallyport. 5:36:43PM - 5:37:40PM - Man exits Karen's Lexus from driver door, second man (Michael Proctor) approaches man. Man takes picture of the front license plate on Karen's Lexus. Proctor walks to back right of Karen's car (near Karen's rear passenger taillight). Man opens and closes Karen's door. Man walks away from Karen's taillight. 5:37:40PM -5:39:37PM - Footage missing from interior Sallyport camera. 5:37:40PM - 5:38:02PM (missing from interior Sallyport camera) - Man walks back towards Karen's Lexus, takes picture of back license plate, talks to Proctor (standing near Karen's rear passenger taillight), and walks away. 5:38:07PM - 5:38:11PM (missing from interior Sallyport camera) - Michael Proctor walks away from Karen Read's taillight and out of the Sallyport. 5:38:34PM - 5:38:41PM (missing from interior Sallyport camera) - Unknown Man 1 walks around near Karen Read's rear passenger taillight (the man appears on camera walking from inside the Canton PD sallyport area near Karen's taillight), and then walks back off camera (while remaining inside the Sallyport and standing directly next to Karen's rear passenger taillight). 5:38:47PM - Canton PD Chief Ken Berkowitz enters Sallyport (per Card Access Logs, source - 5:38:59PM - 5:39:03PM (missing from interior Sallyport camera) - Unknown Man 2 enters Canton PD from Sallyport (on exterior Sallyport camera), approaches Unknown Man 1, turns his heads towards the internal Canton PD Sallyport camera (footage from the internal camera is missing from this moment), and gestures while speaking to Unknown Man 1. 5:39:03PM - 5:39:37PM - Footage missing from exterior (and interior) Sallyport camera. This is the only 30 seconds of footage that is missing from both cameras, and this footage occurs as the very moment the two unknown men were standing near Karen Read's rear passenger taillight). 5:37:40PM -5:39:37PM - Footage missing from interior Sallyport camera. 5:39:37PM - Footage resumes of internal and external Sallyport cameras with five people inside the Sallyport sweeping the floor of snow and talking. 5:45PM ET - The first pieces of Karen Read's taillight are found --by Brian Tully, John Fanning, Yuri Bukhenik and Michael Proctor's State Police team-- at 34 Fairview Road, just 1.4 miles away from the Canton Police Department Sallyport). Over the next three days, even more pieces of Karen Read's broken taillight are "found under melting snow" near the scene at Fairview Road by none other than Chief Berkowitz himself. Previously, on Sunday, I reported: I was able to confirm --live on stream-- that there are 118 seconds of footage missing from the internal Canton PD Sallyport footage at the very moment (5:37-5:39PM ET on 1/29/22) that Michael Proctor and a Mystery man were near Karen Read's rear passenger taillight. The missing from the internal Sallyport camera covers roughly 5:37:40PM -5:39:37PM (1 minute and 58 seconds of footage missing). 30 seconds of footage is also missing from the external Canton PD driveway camera aimed at the Sallyport (this overlaps with 30 seconds of footage missing from the internal Sallyport camera). The missing footage from the external Sallyport camera covers roughly 5:39:03PM - 5:39:37PM (34 seconds missing). Just minutes later, around 5:45PM ET, according to state police reports, the first pieces of Karen's taillight were found on the lawn of 34 Fairview Road by Brian Tully's state police unit (where John O'Keefe's body was found earlier that morning). Of note: at least one person who was at Fairview Road around the time of John's death, an undercover ATF agent named Brian Higgins, was also at the Canton Police Department during the afternoon of 1/29/22 talking to then-chief Ken Berkowitz (Higgins close friend). Berkowitz, for his part, swiped his access card to enter the Canton PD Sallyport at exactly 5:38:47PM ET (in the middle of the missing 118 seconds of footage from the internal Sallyport camera and, shockingly, just 14 seconds before the 30 second gam in the external driveway camera cuts out at 5:39:03PM. My questions: Who --working for the DA-- edited these videos to video crucial details of that 118 seconds while Michael Proctor and at least one Mystery Man were in the direct vicinity of Karen Read's rear passenger Lexus taillight? Did someone --with the help of Brian Tully's State Police unit and the Norfolk DA-- use that window of time to take pieces of Karen's taillight and plant them at Fairview Road in the minutes after 5:39PM on 1/29/22? Why was Ken Berkowitz the person who found even more pieces of Karen's taillight "as the snow melted" in the days after 1/29/22? Why did a Trooper who worked for Brian Tully as Tully's First Officer (a man named John Fanning) previously run a data-related company with Norfolk DA video-editor Coleen Crawford? What did Kelly Devers actually see on the Canton PD cameras that day/evening of 1/29/22? And, perhaps most importantly, who killed John O'Keefe, why did they do so, and how did they have enough pull to call in this kind of coverup? John's family, and every other person tormented by this state police unit (enabled by the Norfolk DA, Michael Morrisey), deserve answers. Be they Karen Read, Sandra Birchmore's family, Tiffany Overstreet, Aidan TurtleBoy Kearney or otherwise, justice is coming. Truth may not a panacea, but it is an asymptote. May we, forever, strive to reach that untouchable x-axis with all of our collective might and prayers. That's what I'll be praying for on this Sunday, and may God bless you all. I meant what I said, as well: Adam Deitch for District Attorney can meet the moment and fix this chaos (in a way that does not destroy the Republic). I believe that with my whole heart. Do consider a vote for Mr. Deitch in the September, 2026, Norfolk District Attorney Primary (if you live in the county). Voters may participate in the primary if they are un-enrolled, or Democrats, 10 days before the primary vote takes place.
7:13

NEW: I have "color-enhanced" all of the new footage from the exterior Canton Police Department Sallyport video between 5:36:06PM - 5:43:55PM on 1/29/22 (the day of John O'Keefe's death). Multiple pieces of footage are missing at crucial moments (as are multiple pieces of footage from the interior Sallyport camera at the same time). Timeline: 5:35:06PM - Exterior footage begins. 5:35:12PM - 5:35:22PM - Footage missing from exterior Sallyport camera. 5:35:44PM - 5:36:03PM - Footage missing from exterior Sallyport camera. 5:36:03PM - 5:35:16PM - Karen Read's Lexus headlights shine against the outside of the Sallyport wall for the first time. 5:36:16PM - 5:36:26PM - Footage missing from exterior Sallyport camera. 5:36:26PM - 5:36:43PM - Karen's Lexus is pulled into Canton PD Sallyport. 5:36:43PM - 5:37:40PM - Man exits Karen's Lexus from driver door, second man (Michael Proctor) approaches man. Man takes picture of the front license plate on Karen's Lexus. Proctor walks to back right of Karen's car (near Karen's rear passenger taillight). Man opens and closes Karen's door. Man walks away from Karen's taillight. 5:37:40PM -5:39:37PM - Footage missing from interior Sallyport camera. 5:37:40PM - 5:38:02PM (missing from interior Sallyport camera) - Man walks back towards Karen's Lexus, takes picture of back license plate, talks to Proctor (standing near Karen's rear passenger taillight), and walks away. 5:38:07PM - 5:38:11PM (missing from interior Sallyport camera) - Michael Proctor walks away from Karen Read's taillight and out of the Sallyport. 5:38:34PM - 5:38:41PM (missing from interior Sallyport camera) - Unknown Man 1 walks around near Karen Read's rear passenger taillight (the man appears on camera walking from inside the Canton PD sallyport area near Karen's taillight), and then walks back off camera (while remaining inside the Sallyport and standing directly next to Karen's rear passenger taillight). 5:38:47PM - Canton PD Chief Ken Berkowitz enters Sallyport (per Card Access Logs, source - 5:38:59PM - 5:39:03PM (missing from interior Sallyport camera) - Unknown Man 2 enters Canton PD from Sallyport (on exterior Sallyport camera), approaches Unknown Man 1, turns his heads towards the internal Canton PD Sallyport camera (footage from the internal camera is missing from this moment), and gestures while speaking to Unknown Man 1. 5:39:03PM - 5:39:37PM - Footage missing from exterior (and interior) Sallyport camera. This is the only 30 seconds of footage that is missing from both cameras, and this footage occurs as the very moment the two unknown men were standing near Karen Read's rear passenger taillight). 5:37:40PM -5:39:37PM - Footage missing from interior Sallyport camera. 5:39:37PM - Footage resumes of internal and external Sallyport cameras with five people inside the Sallyport sweeping the floor of snow and talking. 5:45PM ET - The first pieces of Karen Read's taillight are found --by Brian Tully, John Fanning, Yuri Bukhenik and Michael Proctor's State Police team-- at 34 Fairview Road, just 1.4 miles away from the Canton Police Department Sallyport). Over the next three days, even more pieces of Karen Read's broken taillight are "found under melting snow" near the scene at Fairview Road by none other than Chief Berkowitz himself. Previously, on Sunday, I reported: I was able to confirm --live on stream-- that there are 118 seconds of footage missing from the internal Canton PD Sallyport footage at the very moment (5:37-5:39PM ET on 1/29/22) that Michael Proctor and a Mystery man were near Karen Read's rear passenger taillight. The missing from the internal Sallyport camera covers roughly 5:37:40PM -5:39:37PM (1 minute and 58 seconds of footage missing). 30 seconds of footage is also missing from the external Canton PD driveway camera aimed at the Sallyport (this overlaps with 30 seconds of footage missing from the internal Sallyport camera). The missing footage from the external Sallyport camera covers roughly 5:39:03PM - 5:39:37PM (34 seconds missing). Just minutes later, around 5:45PM ET, according to state police reports, the first pieces of Karen's taillight were found on the lawn of 34 Fairview Road by Brian Tully's state police unit (where John O'Keefe's body was found earlier that morning). Of note: at least one person who was at Fairview Road around the time of John's death, an undercover ATF agent named Brian Higgins, was also at the Canton Police Department during the afternoon of 1/29/22 talking to then-chief Ken Berkowitz (Higgins close friend). Berkowitz, for his part, swiped his access card to enter the Canton PD Sallyport at exactly 5:38:47PM ET (in the middle of the missing 118 seconds of footage from the internal Sallyport camera and, shockingly, just 14 seconds before the 30 second gam in the external driveway camera cuts out at 5:39:03PM. My questions: Who --working for the DA-- edited these videos to video crucial details of that 118 seconds while Michael Proctor and at least one Mystery Man were in the direct vicinity of Karen Read's rear passenger Lexus taillight? Did someone --with the help of Brian Tully's State Police unit and the Norfolk DA-- use that window of time to take pieces of Karen's taillight and plant them at Fairview Road in the minutes after 5:39PM on 1/29/22? Why was Ken Berkowitz the person who found even more pieces of Karen's taillight "as the snow melted" in the days after 1/29/22? Why did a Trooper who worked for Brian Tully as Tully's First Officer (a man named John Fanning) previously run a data-related company with Norfolk DA video-editor Coleen Crawford? What did Kelly Devers actually see on the Canton PD cameras that day/evening of 1/29/22? And, perhaps most importantly, who killed John O'Keefe, why did they do so, and how did they have enough pull to call in this kind of coverup? John's family, and every other person tormented by this state police unit (enabled by the Norfolk DA, Michael Morrisey), deserve answers. Be they Karen Read, Sandra Birchmore's family, Tiffany Overstreet, Aidan TurtleBoy Kearney or otherwise, justice is coming. Truth may not a panacea, but it is an asymptote. May we, forever, strive to reach that untouchable x-axis with all of our collective might and prayers. That's what I'll be praying for on this Sunday, and may God bless you all. I meant what I said, as well: Adam Deitch for District Attorney can meet the moment and fix this chaos (in a way that does not destroy the Republic). I believe that with my whole heart. Do consider a vote for Mr. Deitch in the September, 2026, Norfolk District Attorney Primary (if you live in the county). Voters may participate in the primary if they are un-enrolled, or Democrats, 10 days before the primary vote takes place.

Grant Smith Ellis

29,789 görüntüleme • 29 gün önce

In this clip of Hank’s brilliant closing, he describes: 📍why the charge of Murder 2 directly applies to Karen Read’s actions. 📍Her behavior and the things she said to Kerry and Jenn in the early morning of January 29. (Which again, many of us have reiterated the same theory over the last 2 years) 📍Hank also notes that Karen calls Jenn McCabe at 5:07 and arrives at her home at 5:35. It took Karen 28 minutes to get to JM’s from John’s home, when it’s only a 10 min ride. Where did she go? I have said this from the beginning, and I will continue to say it until I am proven wrong, Karen Read drove by 34 Fairview, saw John lying lifeless in the snow, and then drove away AGAIN, before arriving at Jenn’s. When she did arrive at Jenn‘s, she was frantic and out of control. (because she had just seen John lying dead where she left him just hours earlier 😡) #karenread is guilty #justiceforjohnokeefe
21:59

In this clip of Hank’s brilliant closing, he describes: 📍why the charge of Murder 2 directly applies to Karen Read’s actions. 📍Her behavior and the things she said to Kerry and Jenn in the early morning of January 29. (Which again, many of us have reiterated the same theory over the last 2 years) 📍Hank also notes that Karen calls Jenn McCabe at 5:07 and arrives at her home at 5:35. It took Karen 28 minutes to get to JM’s from John’s home, when it’s only a 10 min ride. Where did she go? I have said this from the beginning, and I will continue to say it until I am proven wrong, Karen Read drove by 34 Fairview, saw John lying lifeless in the snow, and then drove away AGAIN, before arriving at Jenn’s. When she did arrive at Jenn‘s, she was frantic and out of control. (because she had just seen John lying dead where she left him just hours earlier 😡) #karenread is guilty #justiceforjohnokeefe

Andie (Albert) Dufrense

40,823 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Full Breakdown on this: "Key Cycle 1162-2" -Tech Stream data gathered from KRs Lexus shows a triggering event where the Lexus travels in reverse 62 Ft at 24.2 MPH. They claim this triggering event is when KR hits JOK. -Using tech stream data, along with data from the Lexus black box, Aperture (crash reconstruction experts) wrote a report. In the report they claim that based on information from the Lexus black box (the time Karen started her ignition) that the triggering event 1162-2 happened from 12:31:38-12:31:43. -This means that Aperture believes Karen Read struck JOK with her SUV sometime between 12:31:38-12:31:43. -On April 28th, Ian Whiffin testified for the CW. During his testimony he stated that JOKs phone data shows that from 12:31:56-12:32:16, JOK was interacting with his phone. He states that after 12:32:16, there is no more interactions between JOK & the phone. -When you compare the two reports, you see that 13 seconds AFTER Aperture claims JOK was struck (12:31:43), Whiffin claims JOK began interacting with his phone (12:31:56). -The medical examiner testified today that the blow to the back of JOKs head would have left him incapacitated. This means it would be IMPOSSIBLE for JOK to have been on his phone at 12:31:56 (Whiffin's report), based on the time of collision (12:31:43) from the crash reconstruction report (Aperture) -To remedy this massive problem for CW, Aperture decided to amend their report, in the middle of the trial. (May 8th) -They claim that the "clocks on JOKs iPhone and the Lexus are off" They state that JOKs iPhone "runs late" -AMAZINGLY, to remedy the issue between Whiffins testimony and their report, they decided "based on fixing the clock differences" that the NEW time that triggering event happened (the collision) was at 12:32:16. -THE EXACT TIME Whiffin stated JOKs iPhone stops recording apple health data and the last time the phone is interacted with. That is complete bullshit. -In the first trial, the time of collision based on THE EXACT SAME DATA, was said to be 12:45. Shockingly, after learning that Karen Read connected to JOKs wifi at 12:36 AM during the trial, the CW changed their time of the collision yet again, that time to 12:30. -Alessi already cross examined Ian Whiffin about this exact issue with the conflicting times between his report and Apertures. during this trial. On no planet should Bev allow this report to be amended and testified to. This is the bed they made and they have to lay in it. If she allows a change, the defense should immediately move for a mistrial. -When you're trying to make up a story, this is what happens. You make it up as you go and are constantly chasing your tail. This is corruption playing out for the world to see.
0:58

Full Breakdown on this: "Key Cycle 1162-2" -Tech Stream data gathered from KRs Lexus shows a triggering event where the Lexus travels in reverse 62 Ft at 24.2 MPH. They claim this triggering event is when KR hits JOK. -Using tech stream data, along with data from the Lexus black box, Aperture (crash reconstruction experts) wrote a report. In the report they claim that based on information from the Lexus black box (the time Karen started her ignition) that the triggering event 1162-2 happened from 12:31:38-12:31:43. -This means that Aperture believes Karen Read struck JOK with her SUV sometime between 12:31:38-12:31:43. -On April 28th, Ian Whiffin testified for the CW. During his testimony he stated that JOKs phone data shows that from 12:31:56-12:32:16, JOK was interacting with his phone. He states that after 12:32:16, there is no more interactions between JOK & the phone. -When you compare the two reports, you see that 13 seconds AFTER Aperture claims JOK was struck (12:31:43), Whiffin claims JOK began interacting with his phone (12:31:56). -The medical examiner testified today that the blow to the back of JOKs head would have left him incapacitated. This means it would be IMPOSSIBLE for JOK to have been on his phone at 12:31:56 (Whiffin's report), based on the time of collision (12:31:43) from the crash reconstruction report (Aperture) -To remedy this massive problem for CW, Aperture decided to amend their report, in the middle of the trial. (May 8th) -They claim that the "clocks on JOKs iPhone and the Lexus are off" They state that JOKs iPhone "runs late" -AMAZINGLY, to remedy the issue between Whiffins testimony and their report, they decided "based on fixing the clock differences" that the NEW time that triggering event happened (the collision) was at 12:32:16. -THE EXACT TIME Whiffin stated JOKs iPhone stops recording apple health data and the last time the phone is interacted with. That is complete bullshit. -In the first trial, the time of collision based on THE EXACT SAME DATA, was said to be 12:45. Shockingly, after learning that Karen Read connected to JOKs wifi at 12:36 AM during the trial, the CW changed their time of the collision yet again, that time to 12:30. -Alessi already cross examined Ian Whiffin about this exact issue with the conflicting times between his report and Apertures. during this trial. On no planet should Bev allow this report to be amended and testified to. This is the bed they made and they have to lay in it. If she allows a change, the defense should immediately move for a mistrial. -When you're trying to make up a story, this is what happens. You make it up as you go and are constantly chasing your tail. This is corruption playing out for the world to see.

Joe TurtleHead

187,419 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

There was a massive John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial bombshell that went under the surface last week. Not only were 17 Ring videos deleted from John's system between 12:37am and 5:08am on 1/29/22, another video of Karen and her family collecting the murder weapon after 12pm ET that day was also deleted. This means someone (probably Karen) accessed John's Ring system --access that John's niece and nephew have testified Karen possessed-- sometime in the afternoon of 1/29/22 (before search warrants were served on Karen's phone and her car, after 4pm that day, when the vehicle was located by State Police at the home of Karen's parents in Dighton). Indeed, Karen would only need knowledge of John's Ring login information --something Karen had, as evidenced by the document below-- in order to access the system remotely from any device. The fact that there was a video deleted after 12pm on 1/29/22, and that the video in question directly captured Karen and her family leaving John's home with the murder weapon, indicates at least some of the deletions in questions did not occur until Karen was released from the hospital. Karen's access to John's rings system, and the timeline of the deleted videos, thus raises the potential that Karen also deleted 17 of the 18 Ring videos from earlier that morning --between 12:37am and 5:08am, as mentioned-- while at her parents house in Dighton. In turn, this would mean Karen left specific Ring videos on the system, including a staged "bump" into John's car at at 5:08am, in anticipation of being criminally charged. Read a prior public court motion regarding Karen's access to John's ring system here - If these deletions are confirmed, Karen's prior statement during a news interview becomes an ominous double entendre. "I mean, what kind of criminal mastermind am I? Not a very good one," said Read with a smirk to the camera. Perhaps in a prescient manner, when that clip first aired in March of 2025, this is what I reported (at the time, I did not fully realize the implications of Karen also deleting another damning Ring video from after 12pm on 1/29/22); "Karen Read, as I predicted many months ago, left a single Ring video on John O'Keefe's system , from roughly 5:08am, wherein Karen may have staged a fake "bump" into John O'Keefe's car to, in real time, plant reasonable double as to the cause of Read's broken taillight." "I am actually stunned that, in that moment, Karen managed to make sure the other 17 Ring videos on John's system were deleted (from between 12:37am and 5:08am), and managed to stage a fake "bump" into John's car, as a preemptive form of artificial reasonable doubt." "Karen didn't pull it off, but her mind was certainly in overdrive that morning before Read hatched her plan to, in my view, return to Fairview Road (circa 5:23am), confirm John was indeed dead, as a result of Karen hitting John with her car at 12:31am that morning, while drunk, and then leaving John on the lawn in a blizzard." "Then, Read, after 5:35am, went to pick up Jen McCabe and Kerri Roberts, returned to John's house with the two women, told them to stop searching in John's house because "John wasn't there," left the alleged murder weapon in John's driveway, and returned to Fairview Road after 6am (in Kerri's car), whereupon Karen somehow "saw" John's body in the snow, through a blizzard, and before the three women passed the tree line of the lawn of the home where John met his lonesome and untimely end earlier that morning (as a result of what, I believe, was a fight between John and Karen, as to the breakdown of their relationship, spiraling when Karen felt she was losing control of the situation)." See that clip of Karen's "criminal mastermind" statement, and read my shockingly accurate prediction, here - Also of note, in towel's exclusive Karen Cam footage from May 8th, 2025 --when jurors in Read's re-trial were show evidence of Karen's father and brother collecting Read's Lexus from John's home in Canton after 12pm ET on 1/29/22-- prior observations by social media users --related to Bill Read leaving the courtroom within seconds of those clips being shown to jurors-- were confirmed. Read the initial reporting of Mr. Read leaving the courtroom in very seconds after clips were played here - Bill Read --already under observation by a court officer due to reports Mr. Read was staring at jurors as state witnesses were testifying over recent days-- noticeably left the front bench behind his daughter for nearly 40 minutes in the immediate aftermath of the deleted Ring videos (in particular from after 12pm that day involving Mr. Read, Karen's brother, and Karen's sister-in-law - all three of whom are on the state's witness list for the re-trial, but have yet to be called). This was the first time, throughout any proceeding, that Mr. Read left the courtroom benches during trial for an extended period of time. Interestingly, Hank Brennan announced last week in a court motion that the keeper of records for Ring will be testifying in Karen's re-trial --something that did not happen in the first trial-- which, further, suggests that Ring may have a log of when John's account was accessed, where it was accessed from and, most importantly, what videos were deleted from that account (along with when those videos were deleted). Read that motion related to Ring's upcoming testimony, between May 12 and May 16 of 2025, here - If it is indeed confirmed that Karen, or her family member, accessed John's Ring system to remove 17 of the 18 videos recorded between 12:37am and 5:08am on 1/29/22, along with another video after 12pm showing Karen's family collecting the vehicle, with a broken taillight, before taking it back to Dighton-- that is devastating evidence to Karen's defense. It has already been revealed in court papers, in that regard, that Karen was on her laptop at her parent's house around 4pm on 1/29/22 --when Karen's phone and car were collected as evidence by the police-- and, in turn, that may be the smoking gun as to Karen's consciousness of guilt if Ring records indicate videos from John's system were deleted from a remote location (in particular Dighton, Massachusetts) circa 2-4pm or so on that afternoon. Those deleted videos are no doubt very damaging to Karen, and would certainly show her taillight broken when Karen returned to John's home at 12:37am that morning --as confirmed by Karen connecting to John's home wifi at that time-- as well as that taillight being broken when Karen, her father, her brother and her sister-in-law came to collect the alleged murder weapon after 12pm ET on 1/29/22. See testimony from Karen's first trial wherein Karen admitted to one of John's friends --whom Karen tried to bait into an affair by manipulating that friend about John hugging someone on a vacation prior to John's death, until John's friend cut off the affair when he realized Karen was only trying to hurt John-- that Karen "knew where the Ring cameras were" in John's home in the weeks leading up to John's last moments alive, here - Karen, of course, was taken to the hospital (at the request of her own parents) for threatening self harm after confessing to hitting John O'Keefe, while drunk and with a BAC of 0.14-0.28 (2-4 times the legal limit) at exactly 12:32:16am ET on 1/29/22. Firefighter Katie McLaughlin, a key witness in the John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial, testified that she was the person who asked Karen if John had experienced any trauma in the early morning of 1/29/22, to which Karen replied, "I hit him! I hit him! I hit him!" At that point, multiple witnesses to the statement (including other first responders) realized Karen was confessing to hitting John O'Keefe with her car, while drunk with a BAC between 0.14 and 0.28, and then the Canton Police called in their supervisor. See that earthshattering testimony from Firefighter McLaughlin here - Jurors have already seen shocking videos, from Karen's own media interviews, wherein Read admits that she should not have been drunk driving in the moments before she John drove from a bar to an after party a local home. The clips, in turn, not only showed Karen admitting to her state of intoxication while driving but, at the same time, they also showed Karen ADMITTING to having up to nine drinks over just three or so hours on the evening of 1/28/22 and the early morning of 1/29/22. Indeed, see that admission by Read, as to her state of intoxication while driving in the moment's before John was allegedly struck, here - "I had been out late, I had been drinking, John was in the last general vicinity of where I saw him...within 50 feet...he's in the front yard so I'm thinking "Jesus, was I starting to pull away and did I run over his foot." "So when I found him, I was thinking, did I clip him somehow," said Read, in further footage played before jurors. Read's team fought hard to keep those pieces of footage secret from jurors, and the public, but that plan failed. Watch the previously-secret footage of Karen's admission as to potentially hitting John with her car while drunk here - Somehow making Read's situation worse, Hank Brennan than played interviews with Read wherein Karen admitted to attempting to frame one of John's dear friends, Jen McCabe, for Karen's actions. "Jen McCabe? It's me or her! Either I'm going down, Jen, or you are!" Read told a film crew, in remarks played for jurors during week 2 of Karen's re-trial as to causing John's death. See that moment here - Of note, Hank Brennan has played multiple audio and video recordings for the jury related to Karen Read admitting that Karen and John O'Keefe were in an argument in the minutes leading up to Read allegedly striking John with her car, while drunk driving. Karen was upset because the name of John's former girlfriend was mentioned on the drive to Fairview Road. See more background about that argument between a possessive, controlling, Karen Read and John O'Keefe, in the moments before John was allegedly struck by Karen's car at 12:32am on 1/29/22, here - Earlier last week, jurors were aghast at Karen mocking John's mother, Peggy O'Keefe, also in a media interview. See those moments here - Also, as a final note, I want to extend a huge thank you to super towel MrrderByMaestro for noticing the subtle moment in court this week when confirmation came down that a Ring video from John's home system -- that is obviously quite damaging to Karen Read's defense-- was deleted (along with the 17 of 18 videos deleted earlier that morning that also implicate Karen, and her broken taillight, as the cause of John's death). I believe Mr. ByMaestro to be the exemplar of noble towel service to humanity, and I thus deem him a member of Nobilis ordo Linteo (N.o.L.). As always, watch live coverage of Monday's (day 13) presentation of evidence in the John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial, chat with the wonderful towel friends and watch special Towel MultiCam Coverage --including the world famous Karen Cam-- via this link -
20:16

There was a massive John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial bombshell that went under the surface last week. Not only were 17 Ring videos deleted from John's system between 12:37am and 5:08am on 1/29/22, another video of Karen and her family collecting the murder weapon after 12pm ET that day was also deleted. This means someone (probably Karen) accessed John's Ring system --access that John's niece and nephew have testified Karen possessed-- sometime in the afternoon of 1/29/22 (before search warrants were served on Karen's phone and her car, after 4pm that day, when the vehicle was located by State Police at the home of Karen's parents in Dighton). Indeed, Karen would only need knowledge of John's Ring login information --something Karen had, as evidenced by the document below-- in order to access the system remotely from any device. The fact that there was a video deleted after 12pm on 1/29/22, and that the video in question directly captured Karen and her family leaving John's home with the murder weapon, indicates at least some of the deletions in questions did not occur until Karen was released from the hospital. Karen's access to John's rings system, and the timeline of the deleted videos, thus raises the potential that Karen also deleted 17 of the 18 Ring videos from earlier that morning --between 12:37am and 5:08am, as mentioned-- while at her parents house in Dighton. In turn, this would mean Karen left specific Ring videos on the system, including a staged "bump" into John's car at at 5:08am, in anticipation of being criminally charged. Read a prior public court motion regarding Karen's access to John's ring system here - If these deletions are confirmed, Karen's prior statement during a news interview becomes an ominous double entendre. "I mean, what kind of criminal mastermind am I? Not a very good one," said Read with a smirk to the camera. Perhaps in a prescient manner, when that clip first aired in March of 2025, this is what I reported (at the time, I did not fully realize the implications of Karen also deleting another damning Ring video from after 12pm on 1/29/22); "Karen Read, as I predicted many months ago, left a single Ring video on John O'Keefe's system , from roughly 5:08am, wherein Karen may have staged a fake "bump" into John O'Keefe's car to, in real time, plant reasonable double as to the cause of Read's broken taillight." "I am actually stunned that, in that moment, Karen managed to make sure the other 17 Ring videos on John's system were deleted (from between 12:37am and 5:08am), and managed to stage a fake "bump" into John's car, as a preemptive form of artificial reasonable doubt." "Karen didn't pull it off, but her mind was certainly in overdrive that morning before Read hatched her plan to, in my view, return to Fairview Road (circa 5:23am), confirm John was indeed dead, as a result of Karen hitting John with her car at 12:31am that morning, while drunk, and then leaving John on the lawn in a blizzard." "Then, Read, after 5:35am, went to pick up Jen McCabe and Kerri Roberts, returned to John's house with the two women, told them to stop searching in John's house because "John wasn't there," left the alleged murder weapon in John's driveway, and returned to Fairview Road after 6am (in Kerri's car), whereupon Karen somehow "saw" John's body in the snow, through a blizzard, and before the three women passed the tree line of the lawn of the home where John met his lonesome and untimely end earlier that morning (as a result of what, I believe, was a fight between John and Karen, as to the breakdown of their relationship, spiraling when Karen felt she was losing control of the situation)." See that clip of Karen's "criminal mastermind" statement, and read my shockingly accurate prediction, here - Also of note, in towel's exclusive Karen Cam footage from May 8th, 2025 --when jurors in Read's re-trial were show evidence of Karen's father and brother collecting Read's Lexus from John's home in Canton after 12pm ET on 1/29/22-- prior observations by social media users --related to Bill Read leaving the courtroom within seconds of those clips being shown to jurors-- were confirmed. Read the initial reporting of Mr. Read leaving the courtroom in very seconds after clips were played here - Bill Read --already under observation by a court officer due to reports Mr. Read was staring at jurors as state witnesses were testifying over recent days-- noticeably left the front bench behind his daughter for nearly 40 minutes in the immediate aftermath of the deleted Ring videos (in particular from after 12pm that day involving Mr. Read, Karen's brother, and Karen's sister-in-law - all three of whom are on the state's witness list for the re-trial, but have yet to be called). This was the first time, throughout any proceeding, that Mr. Read left the courtroom benches during trial for an extended period of time. Interestingly, Hank Brennan announced last week in a court motion that the keeper of records for Ring will be testifying in Karen's re-trial --something that did not happen in the first trial-- which, further, suggests that Ring may have a log of when John's account was accessed, where it was accessed from and, most importantly, what videos were deleted from that account (along with when those videos were deleted). Read that motion related to Ring's upcoming testimony, between May 12 and May 16 of 2025, here - If it is indeed confirmed that Karen, or her family member, accessed John's Ring system to remove 17 of the 18 videos recorded between 12:37am and 5:08am on 1/29/22, along with another video after 12pm showing Karen's family collecting the vehicle, with a broken taillight, before taking it back to Dighton-- that is devastating evidence to Karen's defense. It has already been revealed in court papers, in that regard, that Karen was on her laptop at her parent's house around 4pm on 1/29/22 --when Karen's phone and car were collected as evidence by the police-- and, in turn, that may be the smoking gun as to Karen's consciousness of guilt if Ring records indicate videos from John's system were deleted from a remote location (in particular Dighton, Massachusetts) circa 2-4pm or so on that afternoon. Those deleted videos are no doubt very damaging to Karen, and would certainly show her taillight broken when Karen returned to John's home at 12:37am that morning --as confirmed by Karen connecting to John's home wifi at that time-- as well as that taillight being broken when Karen, her father, her brother and her sister-in-law came to collect the alleged murder weapon after 12pm ET on 1/29/22. See testimony from Karen's first trial wherein Karen admitted to one of John's friends --whom Karen tried to bait into an affair by manipulating that friend about John hugging someone on a vacation prior to John's death, until John's friend cut off the affair when he realized Karen was only trying to hurt John-- that Karen "knew where the Ring cameras were" in John's home in the weeks leading up to John's last moments alive, here - Karen, of course, was taken to the hospital (at the request of her own parents) for threatening self harm after confessing to hitting John O'Keefe, while drunk and with a BAC of 0.14-0.28 (2-4 times the legal limit) at exactly 12:32:16am ET on 1/29/22. Firefighter Katie McLaughlin, a key witness in the John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial, testified that she was the person who asked Karen if John had experienced any trauma in the early morning of 1/29/22, to which Karen replied, "I hit him! I hit him! I hit him!" At that point, multiple witnesses to the statement (including other first responders) realized Karen was confessing to hitting John O'Keefe with her car, while drunk with a BAC between 0.14 and 0.28, and then the Canton Police called in their supervisor. See that earthshattering testimony from Firefighter McLaughlin here - Jurors have already seen shocking videos, from Karen's own media interviews, wherein Read admits that she should not have been drunk driving in the moments before she John drove from a bar to an after party a local home. The clips, in turn, not only showed Karen admitting to her state of intoxication while driving but, at the same time, they also showed Karen ADMITTING to having up to nine drinks over just three or so hours on the evening of 1/28/22 and the early morning of 1/29/22. Indeed, see that admission by Read, as to her state of intoxication while driving in the moment's before John was allegedly struck, here - "I had been out late, I had been drinking, John was in the last general vicinity of where I saw him...within 50 feet...he's in the front yard so I'm thinking "Jesus, was I starting to pull away and did I run over his foot." "So when I found him, I was thinking, did I clip him somehow," said Read, in further footage played before jurors. Read's team fought hard to keep those pieces of footage secret from jurors, and the public, but that plan failed. Watch the previously-secret footage of Karen's admission as to potentially hitting John with her car while drunk here - Somehow making Read's situation worse, Hank Brennan than played interviews with Read wherein Karen admitted to attempting to frame one of John's dear friends, Jen McCabe, for Karen's actions. "Jen McCabe? It's me or her! Either I'm going down, Jen, or you are!" Read told a film crew, in remarks played for jurors during week 2 of Karen's re-trial as to causing John's death. See that moment here - Of note, Hank Brennan has played multiple audio and video recordings for the jury related to Karen Read admitting that Karen and John O'Keefe were in an argument in the minutes leading up to Read allegedly striking John with her car, while drunk driving. Karen was upset because the name of John's former girlfriend was mentioned on the drive to Fairview Road. See more background about that argument between a possessive, controlling, Karen Read and John O'Keefe, in the moments before John was allegedly struck by Karen's car at 12:32am on 1/29/22, here - Earlier last week, jurors were aghast at Karen mocking John's mother, Peggy O'Keefe, also in a media interview. See those moments here - Also, as a final note, I want to extend a huge thank you to super towel MrrderByMaestro for noticing the subtle moment in court this week when confirmation came down that a Ring video from John's home system -- that is obviously quite damaging to Karen Read's defense-- was deleted (along with the 17 of 18 videos deleted earlier that morning that also implicate Karen, and her broken taillight, as the cause of John's death). I believe Mr. ByMaestro to be the exemplar of noble towel service to humanity, and I thus deem him a member of Nobilis ordo Linteo (N.o.L.). As always, watch live coverage of Monday's (day 13) presentation of evidence in the John O'Keefe and Karen Read re-trial, chat with the wonderful towel friends and watch special Towel MultiCam Coverage --including the world famous Karen Cam-- via this link -

Grant Smith Ellis

101,651 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Ohhhh @JulieCourtT You owe an apology to women & men who have experienced the trauma of intimate partner violence. FACT: the only physical incident during relationship was when Officer O’Keefe “smashed” Karen Read in the face with pillow on 1/28/22 AM re: Dunkin argument On (NOT prime time 😉) Court TV Julie theorizes Karen Read “hit” Officer O’Keefe IN THE CAR causing laceration above his eyebrow!?! 🤨 Dr. Banerjee calls this a “brilliant thought”… Karen Read’s defense IS Officer O’Keefe was beat up & Karen’s Lexus did not cause JOK injuries/death. Dr. Wolf opined “drunk people fall and hit their head” No CW witness has tied the Lexus to JOKs death in 5 weeks of retrial🫣 #FKR
0:45

Ohhhh @JulieCourtT You owe an apology to women & men who have experienced the trauma of intimate partner violence. FACT: the only physical incident during relationship was when Officer O’Keefe “smashed” Karen Read in the face with pillow on 1/28/22 AM re: Dunkin argument On (NOT prime time 😉) Court TV Julie theorizes Karen Read “hit” Officer O’Keefe IN THE CAR causing laceration above his eyebrow!?! 🤨 Dr. Banerjee calls this a “brilliant thought”… Karen Read’s defense IS Officer O’Keefe was beat up & Karen’s Lexus did not cause JOK injuries/death. Dr. Wolf opined “drunk people fall and hit their head” No CW witness has tied the Lexus to JOKs death in 5 weeks of retrial🫣 #FKR

Nurse_Kim

88,403 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce

Lank-house episode is one of the most legitimate credibility problems in Jen and Kerry’s Jan 30th timeline, not because the evidence proves a secret meeting, but because the visit was initially undisclosed, the route changed, and the explanations became narrower only after location data surfaced. 12:13 Jen leaves her house. 12:19 Jen arrives at 1 Meadows. 12:30 Dicicco arrives @ 1 Meadows to interview witnesses 5:12 Jen leaves 1 Meadows. 5:21 Jen returns to her own house. 5:28 Jen leaves her house again. 5:36 Jen’s location is at 34 Fairview. 5:40 Jen leaves the 34 Fairview area. 5:43 Jen arrives at Lank’s house. 6:28 Jen leaves Lank’s house. 6:34 Jen arrives home. Jen was home from 5:21 to 5:28 p.m. She then arrived at Lank’s around 5:43 p.m. only about 15 minutes after leaving home. She was just at her house, why did she just poop in her own house? Why would Jen leave 1 or 2 of her daughters at 1 Meadows, return to her own house, then get back into Kerry’s car to drive past 34 Fairview and spend 45 minutes at Lank’s, only to return home without her daughters? Jen had been at Meadows much of the afternoon, was delivered back to her own home, yet left her daughters behind and immediately set out again with Kerry. The child drop-off explains why Kerry’s daughter might go to Lank’s, but it does not explain why Jen needed to accompany her after Jen had already been brought home
4:55

Lank-house episode is one of the most legitimate credibility problems in Jen and Kerry’s Jan 30th timeline, not because the evidence proves a secret meeting, but because the visit was initially undisclosed, the route changed, and the explanations became narrower only after location data surfaced. 12:13 Jen leaves her house. 12:19 Jen arrives at 1 Meadows. 12:30 Dicicco arrives @ 1 Meadows to interview witnesses 5:12 Jen leaves 1 Meadows. 5:21 Jen returns to her own house. 5:28 Jen leaves her house again. 5:36 Jen’s location is at 34 Fairview. 5:40 Jen leaves the 34 Fairview area. 5:43 Jen arrives at Lank’s house. 6:28 Jen leaves Lank’s house. 6:34 Jen arrives home. Jen was home from 5:21 to 5:28 p.m. She then arrived at Lank’s around 5:43 p.m. only about 15 minutes after leaving home. She was just at her house, why did she just poop in her own house? Why would Jen leave 1 or 2 of her daughters at 1 Meadows, return to her own house, then get back into Kerry’s car to drive past 34 Fairview and spend 45 minutes at Lank’s, only to return home without her daughters? Jen had been at Meadows much of the afternoon, was delivered back to her own home, yet left her daughters behind and immediately set out again with Kerry. The child drop-off explains why Kerry’s daughter might go to Lank’s, but it does not explain why Jen needed to accompany her after Jen had already been brought home

Dixie Normus

27,801 görüntüleme • 12 gün önce