Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

The DA’s latest plan to scrap BBBEE, affirmative action, and other redress laws is proof that they have never believed apartheid truly existed in South Africa. They ignore that black people were deliberately dispossessed of land, wealth, and economic opportunities in their own country. They want the child of...

Collen_Malatji3's profile picture

Thlologelo Collen Malatji

23,911 subscribers

57,390 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

Nachrichten & PolitikBildungFinanzen
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

Asmongold explains why he doesn't believe in stolen land "How is it that we're on stolen land but Constantinople is Istanbul..I feel like it's either both or neither..how does that work..that was in 1453 and we were in America at about the same time" "The way I see it..whenever ppl look at the idea of stolen land..the reason why they want to assign the idea of stolen land is so they can create a guilt that will allow the ppl of that country to allow migrants in..bc they have an obligation to bc they stole the land" "There is no such thing as stolen land..if u take it over, it's yours"
1:51

Asmongold explains why he doesn't believe in stolen land "How is it that we're on stolen land but Constantinople is Istanbul..I feel like it's either both or neither..how does that work..that was in 1453 and we were in America at about the same time" "The way I see it..whenever ppl look at the idea of stolen land..the reason why they want to assign the idea of stolen land is so they can create a guilt that will allow the ppl of that country to allow migrants in..bc they have an obligation to bc they stole the land" "There is no such thing as stolen land..if u take it over, it's yours"

yeet

245,802 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

The unrest in Senegal continues 4 days after it started, and it does not seem that the people of this country want to allow the ruling government to take military action against Niger in line with Western policies. The complex and rapid developments in West Africa have confused everyone, and we have to wait to see if in other countries of this region, with the intervention of the American and European intelligence agencies, they will succeed in keeping the dependent governments in power, or if the military will support the protesting people for They will take action to save their country from the domination of the West.
0:52

The unrest in Senegal continues 4 days after it started, and it does not seem that the people of this country want to allow the ruling government to take military action against Niger in line with Western policies. The complex and rapid developments in West Africa have confused everyone, and we have to wait to see if in other countries of this region, with the intervention of the American and European intelligence agencies, they will succeed in keeping the dependent governments in power, or if the military will support the protesting people for They will take action to save their country from the domination of the West.

𝕊𝕡𝕣𝕚𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕣 𝕻𝕣𝕖𝕤𝕤

1,546,139 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

It is well known that I do not support xenophobia or Afrophobia in South Africa. I have become deeply unpopular among xenophobes and Afrophobes because of this. However I disagree with this white South African. We must condemn xenophobia without hesitation, but we should never use that condemnation to rewrite history. His argument is that black South Africans who have taken over businesses previously run by African migrants should not ask the government for financial assistance to buy stock because “real entrepreneurs” do not depend on the state. It sounds appealing until you look at history. Many of South Africa’s most successful white-owned businesses were built with enormous support from the state. The apartheid government deliberately created and financed a white entrepreneurial class. It did this through subsidised loans, preferential access to land, state procurement, industrial incentives, protectionist policies, and legislation that excluded the black majority from meaningful economic participation. Sasol and Iscor were either created or heavily financed by the state. Volkskas Bank was established specifically to empower Afrikaner business. White commercial agriculture flourished because of generous state support, cheap credit, and land acquired through discriminatory laws. Colonial Rhodesia followed the same pattern. Many of the country’s most successful commercial enterprises were built on land allocated by the colonial state. They were supported by favourable government policies and sustained by an economic system that overwhelmingly favoured white settlers over the African majority. The suggestion that government assistance makes black entrepreneurs less legitimate than white entrepreneurs does not survive contact with this history. Governments have always played a role in building national business champions. The real question is not whether government should support entrepreneurs. It is whether that support is transparent, fair, and available to everyone rather than reserved for one group. If today’s government chooses to support black traders who are trying to rebuild businesses and create jobs, there is nothing inherently wrong with that. What would be wrong is if that support were distributed through corruption, political or patronage. We should reject xenophobia and Afrophobia because they are wrong. We should also reject attempts to erase the fact that many of Southern Africa’s most prominent white business fortunes were built with substantial government assistance under systems designed to favour them over everyone else. History deserves to be confronted honestly, not selectively. The scarecrow of the “tenderpreneur” is often invoked by people who do not understand the economic history of South Africa and Zimbabwe. They speak as if the relationship between business and the state began in 1994. It did not. Another point that is conveniently ignored is that the word tenderpreneur is often used as though it describes a uniquely post-apartheid phenomenon. It does not. What changed after 1994 was not the relationship between business and the state, but who was allowed to participate in it. Under apartheid, access to state contracts, licences, agricultural subsidies, mining rights, import permits and industrial finance was overwhelmingly reserved for white South Africans. Political connections and racial privilege determined who received opportunities, while the black majority was legally excluded from competing for them. Today, people condemn politically connected businessmen as “tenderpreneurs”, yet many of the fortunes accumulated under apartheid through political patronage are rarely subjected to the same scrutiny. History should be applied consistently. If we are going to criticise businesses that prosper because of their proximity to the state, then we must acknowledge that this relationship did not begin with democracy; it was a defining feature of the apartheid economy itself. It is a fact that one of the major downsides of many post-colonial governments in Africa has been the inefficient and, in some cases, corrupt use of state resources. That, however, does not mean the solution is to abandon the idea of helping black people build businesses. The real solution is to ensure that state support is directed towards those who have the merit, the capability, the discipline, and the vision to build sustainable enterprises. I have heard public intellectuals such as Dr Mbuyiseni Ndlozi argue for the establishment of a state-backed bank dedicated to supporting black entrepreneurs. For expressing such views, they have often been demonised by people who, unfortunately, have not taken the time to study the history of how many of the world’s most successful entrepreneurs built their fortunes. This is not unique to South Africa or Rhodesia. In the United States, Fred Trump built much of his property empire through Federal Housing Administration-backed loans and public contracts, and his son Donald Trump inherited a fortune substantially shaped by that state support, later benefiting from long-term tax abatements that made several of his own developments commercially viable. Of course, there is a real difference. FHA lending was framed as broad-based housing policy, not an instrument of racial exclusion, whereas apartheid-era support for white business was explicitly designed to entrench a racial hierarchy. But the underlying mechanism, the state absorbing risk so that private wealth could be built, s the same in both cases. If similar instruments were proposed for entrepreneurs in South Africa, Zimbabwe, or Angola today, many would call it corruption outright without first asking whether the policy was transparent, accountable, and merit-based. The same was true in South Africa and Rhodesia. Many successful white-owned businesses were built with the assistance of subsidised finance, preferential tax policies, state procurement, industrial incentives, and legislation that deliberately favoured white entrepreneurs while excluding the black majority. In many instances, the state absorbed much of the risk, while the wealth that was created became private. The beneficiaries accumulated private fortunes, but the broader public continued to bear many of the long-term economic costs of those policies. So let us not be duplicitous. We must condemn xenophobia, Afrophobia, and all forms of violence directed at people because of their nationality or origin. But we should not allow that condemnation to erase historical reality or prevent serious discussions about how entrepreneurial classes have been built throughout history. The real debate is not whether governments should support entrepreneurs. History shows that governments across the world have done exactly that. The real question is whether such support is transparent, merit-based, accountable, and directed towards people who have the ability to create successful businesses that generate jobs, create wealth, and drive economic growth. Equally, people who have made mistakes or who have been associated with wrongdoing do not automatically lose the right to contribute to important public debates. Their arguments should be judged on their merits, not dismissed simply because of who they are. Listening to an idea is not the same as endorsing the person making it, just as supporting capable entrepreneurs is not the same as supporting corruption. Recognising history does not justify corruption today. It simply reminds us that the relationship between the state and private enterprise has always existed. The real issue is how that relationship is governed.
2:22

It is well known that I do not support xenophobia or Afrophobia in South Africa. I have become deeply unpopular among xenophobes and Afrophobes because of this. However I disagree with this white South African. We must condemn xenophobia without hesitation, but we should never use that condemnation to rewrite history. His argument is that black South Africans who have taken over businesses previously run by African migrants should not ask the government for financial assistance to buy stock because “real entrepreneurs” do not depend on the state. It sounds appealing until you look at history. Many of South Africa’s most successful white-owned businesses were built with enormous support from the state. The apartheid government deliberately created and financed a white entrepreneurial class. It did this through subsidised loans, preferential access to land, state procurement, industrial incentives, protectionist policies, and legislation that excluded the black majority from meaningful economic participation. Sasol and Iscor were either created or heavily financed by the state. Volkskas Bank was established specifically to empower Afrikaner business. White commercial agriculture flourished because of generous state support, cheap credit, and land acquired through discriminatory laws. Colonial Rhodesia followed the same pattern. Many of the country’s most successful commercial enterprises were built on land allocated by the colonial state. They were supported by favourable government policies and sustained by an economic system that overwhelmingly favoured white settlers over the African majority. The suggestion that government assistance makes black entrepreneurs less legitimate than white entrepreneurs does not survive contact with this history. Governments have always played a role in building national business champions. The real question is not whether government should support entrepreneurs. It is whether that support is transparent, fair, and available to everyone rather than reserved for one group. If today’s government chooses to support black traders who are trying to rebuild businesses and create jobs, there is nothing inherently wrong with that. What would be wrong is if that support were distributed through corruption, political or patronage. We should reject xenophobia and Afrophobia because they are wrong. We should also reject attempts to erase the fact that many of Southern Africa’s most prominent white business fortunes were built with substantial government assistance under systems designed to favour them over everyone else. History deserves to be confronted honestly, not selectively. The scarecrow of the “tenderpreneur” is often invoked by people who do not understand the economic history of South Africa and Zimbabwe. They speak as if the relationship between business and the state began in 1994. It did not. Another point that is conveniently ignored is that the word tenderpreneur is often used as though it describes a uniquely post-apartheid phenomenon. It does not. What changed after 1994 was not the relationship between business and the state, but who was allowed to participate in it. Under apartheid, access to state contracts, licences, agricultural subsidies, mining rights, import permits and industrial finance was overwhelmingly reserved for white South Africans. Political connections and racial privilege determined who received opportunities, while the black majority was legally excluded from competing for them. Today, people condemn politically connected businessmen as “tenderpreneurs”, yet many of the fortunes accumulated under apartheid through political patronage are rarely subjected to the same scrutiny. History should be applied consistently. If we are going to criticise businesses that prosper because of their proximity to the state, then we must acknowledge that this relationship did not begin with democracy; it was a defining feature of the apartheid economy itself. It is a fact that one of the major downsides of many post-colonial governments in Africa has been the inefficient and, in some cases, corrupt use of state resources. That, however, does not mean the solution is to abandon the idea of helping black people build businesses. The real solution is to ensure that state support is directed towards those who have the merit, the capability, the discipline, and the vision to build sustainable enterprises. I have heard public intellectuals such as Dr Mbuyiseni Ndlozi argue for the establishment of a state-backed bank dedicated to supporting black entrepreneurs. For expressing such views, they have often been demonised by people who, unfortunately, have not taken the time to study the history of how many of the world’s most successful entrepreneurs built their fortunes. This is not unique to South Africa or Rhodesia. In the United States, Fred Trump built much of his property empire through Federal Housing Administration-backed loans and public contracts, and his son Donald Trump inherited a fortune substantially shaped by that state support, later benefiting from long-term tax abatements that made several of his own developments commercially viable. Of course, there is a real difference. FHA lending was framed as broad-based housing policy, not an instrument of racial exclusion, whereas apartheid-era support for white business was explicitly designed to entrench a racial hierarchy. But the underlying mechanism, the state absorbing risk so that private wealth could be built, s the same in both cases. If similar instruments were proposed for entrepreneurs in South Africa, Zimbabwe, or Angola today, many would call it corruption outright without first asking whether the policy was transparent, accountable, and merit-based. The same was true in South Africa and Rhodesia. Many successful white-owned businesses were built with the assistance of subsidised finance, preferential tax policies, state procurement, industrial incentives, and legislation that deliberately favoured white entrepreneurs while excluding the black majority. In many instances, the state absorbed much of the risk, while the wealth that was created became private. The beneficiaries accumulated private fortunes, but the broader public continued to bear many of the long-term economic costs of those policies. So let us not be duplicitous. We must condemn xenophobia, Afrophobia, and all forms of violence directed at people because of their nationality or origin. But we should not allow that condemnation to erase historical reality or prevent serious discussions about how entrepreneurial classes have been built throughout history. The real debate is not whether governments should support entrepreneurs. History shows that governments across the world have done exactly that. The real question is whether such support is transparent, merit-based, accountable, and directed towards people who have the ability to create successful businesses that generate jobs, create wealth, and drive economic growth. Equally, people who have made mistakes or who have been associated with wrongdoing do not automatically lose the right to contribute to important public debates. Their arguments should be judged on their merits, not dismissed simply because of who they are. Listening to an idea is not the same as endorsing the person making it, just as supporting capable entrepreneurs is not the same as supporting corruption. Recognising history does not justify corruption today. It simply reminds us that the relationship between the state and private enterprise has always existed. The real issue is how that relationship is governed.

Hopewell Chin’ono

41,029 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

𝗛𝗢𝗪 𝗔𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗜𝗗 𝗠𝗔𝗗𝗘 𝗪𝗛𝗜𝗧𝗘 𝗦𝗢𝗨𝗧𝗛 𝗔𝗙𝗥𝗜𝗖𝗔𝗡𝗦 𝗥𝗜𝗖𝗛 White South Africans make up less than 10 per cent of the population but they hold more than two-thirds of the country's wealth. And whenever they are questioned about this glaring anomaly, their response is often outright racist - to wit, that White people hold the country's wealth because they are more hardworking than Black people! However, this is far removed from the truth. Most of their wealth is a result of more than three centuries of colonial exploitation and racist laws that gave them an economic advantage over their Black counterparts. Watch South African media personality Dan Corder explain the different racist policies and laws that the apartheid regime put in place to give White people a head start - one that they’re still profiting from today.
2:19

𝗛𝗢𝗪 𝗔𝗣𝗔𝗥𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗜𝗗 𝗠𝗔𝗗𝗘 𝗪𝗛𝗜𝗧𝗘 𝗦𝗢𝗨𝗧𝗛 𝗔𝗙𝗥𝗜𝗖𝗔𝗡𝗦 𝗥𝗜𝗖𝗛 White South Africans make up less than 10 per cent of the population but they hold more than two-thirds of the country's wealth. And whenever they are questioned about this glaring anomaly, their response is often outright racist - to wit, that White people hold the country's wealth because they are more hardworking than Black people! However, this is far removed from the truth. Most of their wealth is a result of more than three centuries of colonial exploitation and racist laws that gave them an economic advantage over their Black counterparts. Watch South African media personality Dan Corder explain the different racist policies and laws that the apartheid regime put in place to give White people a head start - one that they’re still profiting from today.

African Stream

781,927 Aufrufe • vor 2 Jahren

Our laws empower the people in our country who were discriminated against and we have a constitutional responsibility to ensure that we redress the imbalances of the past.
3:21

Our laws empower the people in our country who were discriminated against and we have a constitutional responsibility to ensure that we redress the imbalances of the past.

Cyril Ramaphosa 🇿🇦

210,084 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

Boykin on Darline Graham: But to me, this is a reflection of the hypocrisy of the lie about meritocracy, the idea that they actually cared about merit. We saw this going back to Sarah Palin, to the president. They continued to promote unqualified, incompetent candidates from the Republican party, and they stuff them down our throats. And then they complain about black people and other women who happen to be Progressive and say that we're not qualified. It's a lie. And they never cared about meritocracy in the first place. From Donald Trump on down.
1:15

Boykin on Darline Graham: But to me, this is a reflection of the hypocrisy of the lie about meritocracy, the idea that they actually cared about merit. We saw this going back to Sarah Palin, to the president. They continued to promote unqualified, incompetent candidates from the Republican party, and they stuff them down our throats. And then they complain about black people and other women who happen to be Progressive and say that we're not qualified. It's a lie. And they never cared about meritocracy in the first place. From Donald Trump on down.

Acyn

65,413 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

🔥🚨BREAKING NEWS: The South African National Assembly announced that they will be confiscating the land, assets and money from White people that live on their land in response to Conservatives and DOGE pushing to cut their funding. They also mentioned the people that they claim US intelligence agencies assassinated including Gaddafi, MLK and Malcom X in addition to claims that’s the US is embracing a ‘golden age of imperialism’ with Elon Musk. “We will expropriate without compensation whether they (white Afrikaners) like it or not. If they object, they can seek refugee in America.”
2:46

🔥🚨BREAKING NEWS: The South African National Assembly announced that they will be confiscating the land, assets and money from White people that live on their land in response to Conservatives and DOGE pushing to cut their funding. They also mentioned the people that they claim US intelligence agencies assassinated including Gaddafi, MLK and Malcom X in addition to claims that’s the US is embracing a ‘golden age of imperialism’ with Elon Musk. “We will expropriate without compensation whether they (white Afrikaners) like it or not. If they object, they can seek refugee in America.”

Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

5,506,785 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

WATCH] On behalf of the African National Congress, I want to state that we a country of over 60 million. There are many people who come to our country and many come to our country to contribute to the wealth of our country and its progress. Many contribute positively in our country. There are people in our country who have taken it upon themselves to do things which the vast majority do not condone and this must not paint South Africans as xenophobic. Indeed we do have a challenge of illegal immigration in South Africa and it’s not a problem unique to South Africa. There are many country’s affected by this. South Africa is a signatory of the Geneva Convention and we must deal with this challenge within the perimeters of the law. We can’t deal with it with hatred. That is why government has adopted a program of action to deal with this particular challenge which the President has made a public announcement. We have called for law enforcement and calmness and follow the government’s Action Plan on dealing with illegal immigration. We have made it very clear as the ANC, we cannot and should not be associated with anything that amounts to hate crimes. In this particular instance the majority of South Africans are people of Ubuntu and humanity. Because we too would not be free without the solidarity and assistance of country’s such as Mozambique in the fight against apartheid. Many people sacrificed such as Samora Machel the President of Mozambique and many combatants died here fighting against apartheid. #ANCinMozambique #ANCatWORK
6:27

WATCH] On behalf of the African National Congress, I want to state that we a country of over 60 million. There are many people who come to our country and many come to our country to contribute to the wealth of our country and its progress. Many contribute positively in our country. There are people in our country who have taken it upon themselves to do things which the vast majority do not condone and this must not paint South Africans as xenophobic. Indeed we do have a challenge of illegal immigration in South Africa and it’s not a problem unique to South Africa. There are many country’s affected by this. South Africa is a signatory of the Geneva Convention and we must deal with this challenge within the perimeters of the law. We can’t deal with it with hatred. That is why government has adopted a program of action to deal with this particular challenge which the President has made a public announcement. We have called for law enforcement and calmness and follow the government’s Action Plan on dealing with illegal immigration. We have made it very clear as the ANC, we cannot and should not be associated with anything that amounts to hate crimes. In this particular instance the majority of South Africans are people of Ubuntu and humanity. Because we too would not be free without the solidarity and assistance of country’s such as Mozambique in the fight against apartheid. Many people sacrificed such as Samora Machel the President of Mozambique and many combatants died here fighting against apartheid. #ANCinMozambique #ANCatWORK

ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula

185,919 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

🔥🚨GRAPHIC Warning: South Africa Kill the Boer Extremism; Why is South Africa going crazy? Hate created hate and people have chose hate to express pain. The appalling chant started because of Apartheid South Africa and colonization of Aboriginal lands. I don’t agree with the approach but I study where things originate from. There are millions of South Africans that have been engaging in a culture and racial war. Unfortunately the West only get to see the highlights. The same man that is leading the chants about killing the white farmer also stated “we are Putin and Putin is us” so for my Conservatives and Democrats it appears we have a confusing narrative. Racist South Africans who are resisting Ukraine? It would be beneficial for the people of the world if we all stopped looking at every scenario based off one video and for Americans saying this is the Woke that America is heading to. If white people never went this far with black please when it was legal to do so please don’t expect black people to do the same. We aren’t in the 90s anymore, there is no way I accept that people still believe media propaganda that people do these things because they are “mindless black savages.” The only reason MSM is truly ignoring this is over their hate for Ukraine. Putin has been forgiving Africa’s debt by the billions this year. There have burials of Black children while they are alive by White South Africans while they were alive, this war that they have is truly beyond us. To the people of the world, we are all tired but we have to LOVE. This white vs. black thing is really looking more barbaric the more it continues. South Africa is simply America if we never had dreamers like Martin and Lincoln.
1:01

🔥🚨GRAPHIC Warning: South Africa Kill the Boer Extremism; Why is South Africa going crazy? Hate created hate and people have chose hate to express pain. The appalling chant started because of Apartheid South Africa and colonization of Aboriginal lands. I don’t agree with the approach but I study where things originate from. There are millions of South Africans that have been engaging in a culture and racial war. Unfortunately the West only get to see the highlights. The same man that is leading the chants about killing the white farmer also stated “we are Putin and Putin is us” so for my Conservatives and Democrats it appears we have a confusing narrative. Racist South Africans who are resisting Ukraine? It would be beneficial for the people of the world if we all stopped looking at every scenario based off one video and for Americans saying this is the Woke that America is heading to. If white people never went this far with black please when it was legal to do so please don’t expect black people to do the same. We aren’t in the 90s anymore, there is no way I accept that people still believe media propaganda that people do these things because they are “mindless black savages.” The only reason MSM is truly ignoring this is over their hate for Ukraine. Putin has been forgiving Africa’s debt by the billions this year. There have burials of Black children while they are alive by White South Africans while they were alive, this war that they have is truly beyond us. To the people of the world, we are all tired but we have to LOVE. This white vs. black thing is really looking more barbaric the more it continues. South Africa is simply America if we never had dreamers like Martin and Lincoln.

Dom Lucre | Breaker of Narratives

1,368,955 Aufrufe • vor 3 Jahren

"No wonder they felt they'd won the lottery...the majority of people would have enjoyed the success exactly the same if they were in their shoes." "There were rules put in place...City never wanted to compete, they wanted to dominate and that needs to remembered." 🎥 The Anfield Wrap
3:02

"No wonder they felt they'd won the lottery...the majority of people would have enjoyed the success exactly the same if they were in their shoes." "There were rules put in place...City never wanted to compete, they wanted to dominate and that needs to remembered." 🎥 The Anfield Wrap

The Anfield Wrap

22,557 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

Ernst Roets: “If we were to measure racism, the racism of a government, by the amount of race laws that they have written or implemented, then South Africa is certainly the most racist country or government in the history of the world.”
1:15

Ernst Roets: “If we were to measure racism, the racism of a government, by the amount of race laws that they have written or implemented, then South Africa is certainly the most racist country or government in the history of the world.”

Thomas Sowell Quotes

31,920 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

[WATCH] Those right wing NGOs are a bunch of unpatriotic South Africans, they have campaigned for the ANC to be sanctioned, distorted our redress and transformation policies and why we have those laws in the first place. We are levelling the playing field because of apartheid.
4:21

[WATCH] Those right wing NGOs are a bunch of unpatriotic South Africans, they have campaigned for the ANC to be sanctioned, distorted our redress and transformation policies and why we have those laws in the first place. We are levelling the playing field because of apartheid.

ANC SECRETARY GENERAL | Fikile Mbalula

30,670 Aufrufe • vor 10 Monaten

The yts are angry that the majority of the top 40 students in matric are black in a majority black country, the whites that needed dozens of Apartheid laws to survive and compete, still somehow think they’re the only ones with ability and merit. But keep thinking BEE doesn’t benefit you, and it’s just for tenders. She read them to filth.👍🏾😭
0:49

The yts are angry that the majority of the top 40 students in matric are black in a majority black country, the whites that needed dozens of Apartheid laws to survive and compete, still somehow think they’re the only ones with ability and merit. But keep thinking BEE doesn’t benefit you, and it’s just for tenders. She read them to filth.👍🏾😭

member of Hamas🇿🇦🇿🇦🇿🇦🇿🇦🇿🇦🇿🇦

141,097 Aufrufe • vor 8 Monaten

Trump: I will not be abandoning the farmers. We are strong on the borders and for the farmers and others in the hotel industry. We have similar situations and Kristi and I will be working with the states and we will work something where the farmers and be responsible. They have had people around for 10 or 15 years and they know them well, we will put them responsible, and issue a form of card or documents and the farmer will be responsible for these people. They will not have citizenship but they will be working and paying taxes. We need to get our farmers the people they need or else the farmers will not be able to do their land. It was tried when there was a very strong guy, and he got everybody out, and every farm almost in the country but every farm in California or Iowa went bankrupt and they had nobody to work and we do not want that situation. We will put our farmers and others in charge of the people that they have under them. They know the people and it will work out well. We will take care of our farmer but to get the criminals out. Go ahead.
1:31

Trump: I will not be abandoning the farmers. We are strong on the borders and for the farmers and others in the hotel industry. We have similar situations and Kristi and I will be working with the states and we will work something where the farmers and be responsible. They have had people around for 10 or 15 years and they know them well, we will put them responsible, and issue a form of card or documents and the farmer will be responsible for these people. They will not have citizenship but they will be working and paying taxes. We need to get our farmers the people they need or else the farmers will not be able to do their land. It was tried when there was a very strong guy, and he got everybody out, and every farm almost in the country but every farm in California or Iowa went bankrupt and they had nobody to work and we do not want that situation. We will put our farmers and others in charge of the people that they have under them. They know the people and it will work out well. We will take care of our farmer but to get the criminals out. Go ahead.

Acyn

282,154 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

I ask for everyone to watch this, absorb this, and share it. This is THE most important and truthful speech ever given by any human being in the history of the Middle East. Listen to every single word Golda Meir says. Because this is the answer that destroys every ounce of propaganda ever told against Israel. If we are told by the entire world to give to the Arab people the land prior to the war of 1967 because it’s so important, then why was there a war in 1967??? Arabs already controlled the land prior to 1967. Neither Egypt nor Syria nor Jordan gave this land to the “Palestinians”. Nope. They attacked Israel to wipe us out because it’s never been about the land they had, but it’s because of the land we have. They want all of it. They want ethnic cleansing. They want genocide. That’s the truth. The reality is that nobody is willing to repatriate the Arabs because it will cause a world war. So instead, the world believes it’s easier to sacrifice 10 million Israeli lives to appease the Arabs. And I and every other genuine Israeli (not these leftist freaks who hate Israel from the inside) are saying loudly and clearly, that we will never allow our people to be sacrificed again. We will defend our land and our people to the death. And however many of our enemies need to die so that we are not exterminated by them, so be it. They are the warmongers. They are the ones starting wars. They are the murderers. And we will crush them all!!!
8:58

I ask for everyone to watch this, absorb this, and share it. This is THE most important and truthful speech ever given by any human being in the history of the Middle East. Listen to every single word Golda Meir says. Because this is the answer that destroys every ounce of propaganda ever told against Israel. If we are told by the entire world to give to the Arab people the land prior to the war of 1967 because it’s so important, then why was there a war in 1967??? Arabs already controlled the land prior to 1967. Neither Egypt nor Syria nor Jordan gave this land to the “Palestinians”. Nope. They attacked Israel to wipe us out because it’s never been about the land they had, but it’s because of the land we have. They want all of it. They want ethnic cleansing. They want genocide. That’s the truth. The reality is that nobody is willing to repatriate the Arabs because it will cause a world war. So instead, the world believes it’s easier to sacrifice 10 million Israeli lives to appease the Arabs. And I and every other genuine Israeli (not these leftist freaks who hate Israel from the inside) are saying loudly and clearly, that we will never allow our people to be sacrificed again. We will defend our land and our people to the death. And however many of our enemies need to die so that we are not exterminated by them, so be it. They are the warmongers. They are the ones starting wars. They are the murderers. And we will crush them all!!!

Mor Edge Insight

356,109 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr