Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

🚨🔥 THE DEFENSE IS WINNING: REASONABLE DOUBT IS EVERYWHERE! 🔥⚖️ 🚨 JOIN MY DISCORD FOR LIVE LIL DURK TRIAL UPDATES + RECEIPTS: Lil Durk’s defense is building its case that DURK WAS SET UP — NOT RUNNING THE CONSPIRACY! 👀💣 The defense has presented evidence it says creates REASONABLE...

donatpov's profile picture

DONAT

3,547 subscribers

54,532 Aufrufe • vor 1 Tag •via X (Twitter)

Wissenschaft & TechnologieComedyNachrichten & Politik
LIVE

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

LIL DURK’S DEFENSE ATTACKS MURDER-FOR-HIRE CASE: “NO MONEY, NO BOUNTY, NO REWARD” 👀⚖️ Day 1 of opening statements in Lil Durk’s federal trial is already producing some major arguments from the defense. According to a courtroom recap from Ceddy Nash, Durk’s defense pushed back on the government’s alleged murder-for-hire theory, arguing there was no money, bounty or reward connecting Durk to the alleged plot. The defense also reportedly addressed the “don’t book no flights with my name on it” message, arguing it was related to shows rather than the alleged plot. This is only the beginning of the trial, and prosecutors will still have the opportunity to present their evidence and witnesses to the jury. Y’all think the money trail will be the biggest issue for prosecutors in this case? 👀⚖️
3:59

LIL DURK’S DEFENSE ATTACKS MURDER-FOR-HIRE CASE: “NO MONEY, NO BOUNTY, NO REWARD” 👀⚖️ Day 1 of opening statements in Lil Durk’s federal trial is already producing some major arguments from the defense. According to a courtroom recap from Ceddy Nash, Durk’s defense pushed back on the government’s alleged murder-for-hire theory, arguing there was no money, bounty or reward connecting Durk to the alleged plot. The defense also reportedly addressed the “don’t book no flights with my name on it” message, arguing it was related to shows rather than the alleged plot. This is only the beginning of the trial, and prosecutors will still have the opportunity to present their evidence and witnesses to the jury. Y’all think the money trail will be the biggest issue for prosecutors in this case? 👀⚖️

Traps N Trunks

64,828 Aufrufe • vor 2 Tagen

Wack 100 weighs in on the debate over Lil Durk’s defense strategy and says Durk isn’t snitching just because his attorneys are pointing the finger at someone who already made a deal with federal prosecutors. According to Wack, if a cooperating witness admitted what happened and implicated Durk first, the defense has every right to use those statements against him. “Not because I told them—it’s because you told them.” Do y’all agree with Wack 100, or is this still considered snitching? 👀👇🏾
1:43

Wack 100 weighs in on the debate over Lil Durk’s defense strategy and says Durk isn’t snitching just because his attorneys are pointing the finger at someone who already made a deal with federal prosecutors. According to Wack, if a cooperating witness admitted what happened and implicated Durk first, the defense has every right to use those statements against him. “Not because I told them—it’s because you told them.” Do y’all agree with Wack 100, or is this still considered snitching? 👀👇🏾

Traps N Trunks

39,830 Aufrufe • vor 1 Tag

🚨 Lil Durk’s Legal Team Praises Judge’s Thorough Review Following Court Hearing ⚖️ Lil Durk’s lead attorney Drew Findling spoke to the media alongside defense attorneys Christy O’Connor and Brian Steele following today’s hearing, commending the judge for carefully reviewing every filing and argument presented by both sides. 🗣️ Drew Findling: • “It was one of those days that makes it so rewarding to be a trial attorney when a judge takes everything that was submitted and goes through it so thoroughly.” • “The docket really speaks for itself.” • “Our innocent client, Durk Banks… is waiting.” ➡️ Findling also praised co-counsel Christy O’Connor for the defense’s work, saying the legal filings and the judge’s questions during the hearing reflected the depth of preparation that has gone into the case. ➡️ The defense says it is now awaiting the judge’s written order, which they expect by the close of business. If the ruling is favorable, they hope to move forward with Lil Durk’s scheduled trial on August 20, 2026, after preparing for the case over the last 22 months. 🗣️ “We’re super excited for His Honor’s order to come out today.” ➡️ The attorneys declined to answer questions from reporters, saying the court’s analysis and the filings already speak for themselves. 👀 Do you think today’s hearing was a positive sign for Lil Durk’s defense?
1:43

🚨 Lil Durk’s Legal Team Praises Judge’s Thorough Review Following Court Hearing ⚖️ Lil Durk’s lead attorney Drew Findling spoke to the media alongside defense attorneys Christy O’Connor and Brian Steele following today’s hearing, commending the judge for carefully reviewing every filing and argument presented by both sides. 🗣️ Drew Findling: • “It was one of those days that makes it so rewarding to be a trial attorney when a judge takes everything that was submitted and goes through it so thoroughly.” • “The docket really speaks for itself.” • “Our innocent client, Durk Banks… is waiting.” ➡️ Findling also praised co-counsel Christy O’Connor for the defense’s work, saying the legal filings and the judge’s questions during the hearing reflected the depth of preparation that has gone into the case. ➡️ The defense says it is now awaiting the judge’s written order, which they expect by the close of business. If the ruling is favorable, they hope to move forward with Lil Durk’s scheduled trial on August 20, 2026, after preparing for the case over the last 22 months. 🗣️ “We’re super excited for His Honor’s order to come out today.” ➡️ The attorneys declined to answer questions from reporters, saying the court’s analysis and the filings already speak for themselves. 👀 Do you think today’s hearing was a positive sign for Lil Durk’s defense?

Cousin Tino ™️

39,264 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

A man confronts Trap Lore Ross outside the courthouse where Lil Durk's trial is being held for saying Durk blamed everything on OTF Vonnie. The U.K. YouTube channel host's coverage of the Durk case has been rubbing some people the wrong way. On Tuesday (Aug. 25), Instagram user fff_zulqarnain shared a video online that shows him pressing Ross for tweeting that Durk put the entire blame on cooperating witness Kavon "OTF Vonnie" Grant. "That's what was said in the courtroom," Ross replied as he tried to get away from the man. "All I'm saying is Vonnie took accountability and tried to drag Durk in," the man responded. "All I'm saying is, we don't want you to put the narrative out there that Durk is on the stand or testifying against anybody." Zulqarnain isn't the only person who has taken issue with Ross' reporting in the murder-for-hire case against Durk, DeAndre Wilson and David Lindsey for the killing of Quando Rondo's cousin. Publicist Holly Baird has also called Ross out for not accurately relaying things that are happening in the trial. As well as attorney Moe Gangat.
1:23

A man confronts Trap Lore Ross outside the courthouse where Lil Durk's trial is being held for saying Durk blamed everything on OTF Vonnie. The U.K. YouTube channel host's coverage of the Durk case has been rubbing some people the wrong way. On Tuesday (Aug. 25), Instagram user fff_zulqarnain shared a video online that shows him pressing Ross for tweeting that Durk put the entire blame on cooperating witness Kavon "OTF Vonnie" Grant. "That's what was said in the courtroom," Ross replied as he tried to get away from the man. "All I'm saying is Vonnie took accountability and tried to drag Durk in," the man responded. "All I'm saying is, we don't want you to put the narrative out there that Durk is on the stand or testifying against anybody." Zulqarnain isn't the only person who has taken issue with Ross' reporting in the murder-for-hire case against Durk, DeAndre Wilson and David Lindsey for the killing of Quando Rondo's cousin. Publicist Holly Baird has also called Ross out for not accurately relaying things that are happening in the trial. As well as attorney Moe Gangat.

XXL Magazine

45,831 Aufrufe • vor 21 Stunden

Lil Durk’s team releases a statement on the recent developments in his case. Durk is scheduled to go before a judge on May 8 after his attorney argued that the government provided false evidence to a grand jury in order to get an indictment on the rapper. During the hearing, Durk's team will offer a substantial bond offer, according to court documents obtained by XXL on Tuesday (April 29). Durk has been in custody since he was arrested last October and charged with murder-for-hire in connection with the killing of Quando Rondo's cousin in August of 2022. Durk's trial is scheduled to begin on Oct. 14.
0:30

Lil Durk’s team releases a statement on the recent developments in his case. Durk is scheduled to go before a judge on May 8 after his attorney argued that the government provided false evidence to a grand jury in order to get an indictment on the rapper. During the hearing, Durk's team will offer a substantial bond offer, according to court documents obtained by XXL on Tuesday (April 29). Durk has been in custody since he was arrested last October and charged with murder-for-hire in connection with the killing of Quando Rondo's cousin in August of 2022. Durk's trial is scheduled to begin on Oct. 14.

XXL Magazine

21,268 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

Akademiks says it’s a sad situation, but Lil Durk is realizing that the industry is full of fake friends and life has moved on while he’s been locked up. Ak says that those same d!ckriders who used to champion Durk while he was free are now standing with G Herbo—effectively viewing him as Durk’s “replacement.” Ak says Herbo should be wary of this as well.
2:59

Akademiks says it’s a sad situation, but Lil Durk is realizing that the industry is full of fake friends and life has moved on while he’s been locked up. Ak says that those same d!ckriders who used to champion Durk while he was free are now standing with G Herbo—effectively viewing him as Durk’s “replacement.” Ak says Herbo should be wary of this as well.

Akademiks TV

39,678 Aufrufe • vor 7 Monaten

🚨👀 Lil Durk Trial Update: Trap Lore Ross Responds After Being Approached By Durk Supporters Outside Courthouse Trap Lore Ross addressed a video circulating online that shows him being approached outside the courthouse by people who questioned his reporting on the Lil Durk trial and challenged him over why he wouldn’t say “Free Lil Durk.” Ross says he found the interaction funny at the time, especially because the person accused him of doing “police stuff” while standing outside a federal courthouse where the actual prosecutors and federal agents were inside the courtroom. However, Ross says the incident was more serious because it allegedly marked the third time someone has attempted to interfere with his reporting outside the courthouse. Ross also described a previous encounter with a person who repeatedly appeared in the background of his videos. He claims that when he later approached the individual and asked who they were and what they were doing, they refused to provide any information. According to Ross, that same person later approached him again and allegedly made comments that he viewed as intimidating toward him, his security and people he had met around the courthouse. Ross also claims another individual showed up wearing a mask and using a speaker in an apparent attempt to disrupt his filming. 🗣️ Trap Lore Ross: “All of these people that are trying to meddle in what I’m doing, you’re making things worse for Lil Durk.” Ross pointed to the judge recently admonishing people for handing out “Free Durk” flyers inside the courthouse, arguing that attempts to intimidate or interfere with reporters could create an even bigger issue for Durk and his defense. He also said he doesn’t believe Durk’s team is happy about the behavior happening outside the courthouse. Ross overall message: If you’re trying to support Lil Durk, he believes confronting reporters, disrupting coverage or attempting to intimidate people could ultimately hurt more than help. 🧐 What Do You All Think?
3:02

🚨👀 Lil Durk Trial Update: Trap Lore Ross Responds After Being Approached By Durk Supporters Outside Courthouse Trap Lore Ross addressed a video circulating online that shows him being approached outside the courthouse by people who questioned his reporting on the Lil Durk trial and challenged him over why he wouldn’t say “Free Lil Durk.” Ross says he found the interaction funny at the time, especially because the person accused him of doing “police stuff” while standing outside a federal courthouse where the actual prosecutors and federal agents were inside the courtroom. However, Ross says the incident was more serious because it allegedly marked the third time someone has attempted to interfere with his reporting outside the courthouse. Ross also described a previous encounter with a person who repeatedly appeared in the background of his videos. He claims that when he later approached the individual and asked who they were and what they were doing, they refused to provide any information. According to Ross, that same person later approached him again and allegedly made comments that he viewed as intimidating toward him, his security and people he had met around the courthouse. Ross also claims another individual showed up wearing a mask and using a speaker in an apparent attempt to disrupt his filming. 🗣️ Trap Lore Ross: “All of these people that are trying to meddle in what I’m doing, you’re making things worse for Lil Durk.” Ross pointed to the judge recently admonishing people for handing out “Free Durk” flyers inside the courthouse, arguing that attempts to intimidate or interfere with reporters could create an even bigger issue for Durk and his defense. He also said he doesn’t believe Durk’s team is happy about the behavior happening outside the courthouse. Ross overall message: If you’re trying to support Lil Durk, he believes confronting reporters, disrupting coverage or attempting to intimidate people could ultimately hurt more than help. 🧐 What Do You All Think?

Cousin Tino ™️

46,262 Aufrufe • vor 4 Tagen

Let’s listen to attorney Baron Coleman to see what he thinks about ”the mountain of evidence” that was promised to the public. There doesn’t have to be a conspiracy involved at all in this case. I am not suggesting that. The question is if you/me/anyone/the jury would send a person to death IF (1) there isn’t enough substance to convince a jury about ’guilt beyond a reasonable doubt’ AND (2) there’s no alternative assassin presented. Hopefully the answer is ’no’ (because that could be you/me/anyone/the jury sitting in Tyler Robinson’s chair). My point is that the trial is about Tyler Robinson’s guilt. The defense doesn’t need an alternative theory about who killed Charlie Kirk to prove his guilt (just like the defense in the OJ Simpson case didn’t need an alternative theory about who killed Nicole Brown). It’s up to the prosecution to prove guilt and that’s what will ultimately matter in the trial.
2:27

Let’s listen to attorney Baron Coleman to see what he thinks about ”the mountain of evidence” that was promised to the public. There doesn’t have to be a conspiracy involved at all in this case. I am not suggesting that. The question is if you/me/anyone/the jury would send a person to death IF (1) there isn’t enough substance to convince a jury about ’guilt beyond a reasonable doubt’ AND (2) there’s no alternative assassin presented. Hopefully the answer is ’no’ (because that could be you/me/anyone/the jury sitting in Tyler Robinson’s chair). My point is that the trial is about Tyler Robinson’s guilt. The defense doesn’t need an alternative theory about who killed Charlie Kirk to prove his guilt (just like the defense in the OJ Simpson case didn’t need an alternative theory about who killed Nicole Brown). It’s up to the prosecution to prove guilt and that’s what will ultimately matter in the trial.

Turtle (𝔦, 𝔦)

10,753 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

A new update in Lil Durk’s case is starting to shift the conversation. 👀⚖️ While a lot of people online keep saying he’s “cooked,” legal voices are now pushing back on that narrative. Attorney Bradford Cohen recently shared that he actually likes Durk’s chances at trial, saying the case is not a slam dunk and is definitely defendable. At the same time, Moe Gangat broke down how parts of the case have reportedly weakened — including allegations being trimmed down and certain evidence no longer being used. According to the breakdown, some key points in the indictments have changed over time, and even timeline arguments have shifted, which could play a role in how this all unfolds in court. With the trial now pushed back, it looks like this situation might be more complicated than people first thought. Y’all think Durk got a real chance at beating this… or is this just talk? 🤔
2:59

A new update in Lil Durk’s case is starting to shift the conversation. 👀⚖️ While a lot of people online keep saying he’s “cooked,” legal voices are now pushing back on that narrative. Attorney Bradford Cohen recently shared that he actually likes Durk’s chances at trial, saying the case is not a slam dunk and is definitely defendable. At the same time, Moe Gangat broke down how parts of the case have reportedly weakened — including allegations being trimmed down and certain evidence no longer being used. According to the breakdown, some key points in the indictments have changed over time, and even timeline arguments have shifted, which could play a role in how this all unfolds in court. With the trial now pushed back, it looks like this situation might be more complicated than people first thought. Y’all think Durk got a real chance at beating this… or is this just talk? 🤔

Traps N Trunks

133,728 Aufrufe • vor 3 Monaten

Oh Baron Coleman, you are shifting the goalposts now. Yes, his defense team has to try to show reasonable doubt. That is why we try cases. A good defense attorney would know that. However, for months you have spun non-stop conspiracy slop to claim that he is innocent -- even going so far as to implicate Turning Point USA and Erika Kirk in some sort of conspiracy to commit or cover up Charlie Kirk 's murder. There is a literal mountain of evidence -- so much that the defense team wanted 6 months to try to review it all! Since you are now admitting that you don't know what you are talking about, perhaps it should be you who sits back, shuts up, and waits for the trial. But you won't do that because that SuperChat money is too good to pass up. What good does it do a man to gain the whole world, and lose his own soul ...
0:51

Oh Baron Coleman, you are shifting the goalposts now. Yes, his defense team has to try to show reasonable doubt. That is why we try cases. A good defense attorney would know that. However, for months you have spun non-stop conspiracy slop to claim that he is innocent -- even going so far as to implicate Turning Point USA and Erika Kirk in some sort of conspiracy to commit or cover up Charlie Kirk 's murder. There is a literal mountain of evidence -- so much that the defense team wanted 6 months to try to review it all! Since you are now admitting that you don't know what you are talking about, perhaps it should be you who sits back, shuts up, and waits for the trial. But you won't do that because that SuperChat money is too good to pass up. What good does it do a man to gain the whole world, and lose his own soul ...

Zac Kaizen

15,820 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

NEW: Lindsay Clancy's defense is nearing the end of its case as jurors hear competing accounts over one of the trial's biggest questions: Did she hear a voice commanding her to kill her three children? Three defense witnesses say Clancy described a male voice giving her that command. But prosecutors highlight what they say is a critical gap: the alleged voices do not appear in her medical records. The defense is expected to rest today, with prosecutors then calling three rebuttal witnesses. The prosecution argues Clancy deliberately killed her children and must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that she was sane at the time. Closing arguments are expected early next week.
2:19

NEW: Lindsay Clancy's defense is nearing the end of its case as jurors hear competing accounts over one of the trial's biggest questions: Did she hear a voice commanding her to kill her three children? Three defense witnesses say Clancy described a male voice giving her that command. But prosecutors highlight what they say is a critical gap: the alleged voices do not appear in her medical records. The defense is expected to rest today, with prosecutors then calling three rebuttal witnesses. The prosecution argues Clancy deliberately killed her children and must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that she was sane at the time. Closing arguments are expected early next week.

Fox News

174,042 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

🚨 CousinTino Breaks Down What He Saw From The Potential Jurors On Day 1 Of The Lil Durk Trial 👀⚖️ CousinTino gave his initial observations after watching potential jurors enter the jury assembly area on Day 1 of the Lil Durk, Dede & Browneyez murder-for-hire trial. According to Tino, the jury pool he saw appeared to skew 35 and older, with what he described as a predominantly Caucasian group and relatively few younger Black jurors. Tino estimated that he saw roughly 5 Black people, 8 Latino people and 6 Asian people, with the remainder of the group appearing to be predominantly white. He believes the makeup of the potential jury could present a challenge for the defense, particularly with the government expected to present evidence involving alleged street activity, lyrics and other material connected to the case. 🗣️ CousinTino: “It’s going to be an uphill battle. It’s not only is he going to have to fight the evidence, he’s going to have to fight some of them jurors.” Tino also questioned how certain jurors might react to some of the evidence expected to be played in court, while acknowledging that his observations are based solely on what he saw during jury assembly. The court is currently working through approximately 80 potential jurors with the goal of narrowing the pool down to 16, while also determining whether any prospective jurors have personal or family connections to the defendants or others involved in the case. Tino ultimately believes the defense team — including Brian Steel, Drew Findling, Christy O’Connor and others — could have their hands full depending on who makes the final jury. ⚠️ Tino’s comments are his personal observations and opinions, not a determination of how any individual juror will ultimately view the case. Jurors are required to base their decisions on the evidence and the law. 👀 What do you make of CousinTino’s observations from Day 1 of jury selection?
4:09

🚨 CousinTino Breaks Down What He Saw From The Potential Jurors On Day 1 Of The Lil Durk Trial 👀⚖️ CousinTino gave his initial observations after watching potential jurors enter the jury assembly area on Day 1 of the Lil Durk, Dede & Browneyez murder-for-hire trial. According to Tino, the jury pool he saw appeared to skew 35 and older, with what he described as a predominantly Caucasian group and relatively few younger Black jurors. Tino estimated that he saw roughly 5 Black people, 8 Latino people and 6 Asian people, with the remainder of the group appearing to be predominantly white. He believes the makeup of the potential jury could present a challenge for the defense, particularly with the government expected to present evidence involving alleged street activity, lyrics and other material connected to the case. 🗣️ CousinTino: “It’s going to be an uphill battle. It’s not only is he going to have to fight the evidence, he’s going to have to fight some of them jurors.” Tino also questioned how certain jurors might react to some of the evidence expected to be played in court, while acknowledging that his observations are based solely on what he saw during jury assembly. The court is currently working through approximately 80 potential jurors with the goal of narrowing the pool down to 16, while also determining whether any prospective jurors have personal or family connections to the defendants or others involved in the case. Tino ultimately believes the defense team — including Brian Steel, Drew Findling, Christy O’Connor and others — could have their hands full depending on who makes the final jury. ⚠️ Tino’s comments are his personal observations and opinions, not a determination of how any individual juror will ultimately view the case. Jurors are required to base their decisions on the evidence and the law. 👀 What do you make of CousinTino’s observations from Day 1 of jury selection?

Cousin Tino ™️

11,568 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

Jack Posobiec contradicted himself in real time. He admitted the prosecution carries the burden, then demanded Tyler Robinson’s defense prove he was somewhere else. That flips the entire justice system upside down. The defense does not have to prove Tyler was absent. The prosecution has to prove he was there and committed the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. Their argument is basically: “We know you do not have to prove your innocence, but why haven’t you proved your innocence?” That is like accusing Jack of robbing a bank, then treating his missing dinner receipt as evidence of guilt. No alibi is not proof of presence. Silence is not guilt. Cabot asked the wrong question. The real question is simple. What reliable evidence places Tyler Robinson on that campus? #DueProcess #BurdenOfProof #Justice
2:30

Jack Posobiec contradicted himself in real time. He admitted the prosecution carries the burden, then demanded Tyler Robinson’s defense prove he was somewhere else. That flips the entire justice system upside down. The defense does not have to prove Tyler was absent. The prosecution has to prove he was there and committed the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. Their argument is basically: “We know you do not have to prove your innocence, but why haven’t you proved your innocence?” That is like accusing Jack of robbing a bank, then treating his missing dinner receipt as evidence of guilt. No alibi is not proof of presence. Silence is not guilt. Cabot asked the wrong question. The real question is simple. What reliable evidence places Tyler Robinson on that campus? #DueProcess #BurdenOfProof #Justice

Mr. Gerald Wayne

30,890 Aufrufe • vor 1 Monat

What Yannetti explained tonight on Defense Diaries was basically a masterclass in trial strategy. Everyone wanted Proctor on that stand but the how matters. If the defense calls him, Brennan gets a free second closing argument disguised as cross-examination, walking Proctor through every “helpful” point with the witness nodding along. That’s not just risky, it’s handing the Commonwealth a megaphone. Instead, the defense played it clean. They used Proctor’s buddy to authenticate the texts. No theatrics, no backdoor second summation, just the evidence, Proctor’s own words without giving him the platform. It also shows how much the defense learned from Trial #1. They weren’t about to “over-try” the case again or take on burdens that aren’t theirs. Their job wasn’t to prove Karen’s innocence beyond all doubt it was to expose reasonable doubt in the Commonwealth’s case. And they did that without falling into traps. Bottom line: Proctor never testified, but his texts did. And in the end, those texts did more damage than his spin ever could. David Yannetti @Defense_Dia
2:04

What Yannetti explained tonight on Defense Diaries was basically a masterclass in trial strategy. Everyone wanted Proctor on that stand but the how matters. If the defense calls him, Brennan gets a free second closing argument disguised as cross-examination, walking Proctor through every “helpful” point with the witness nodding along. That’s not just risky, it’s handing the Commonwealth a megaphone. Instead, the defense played it clean. They used Proctor’s buddy to authenticate the texts. No theatrics, no backdoor second summation, just the evidence, Proctor’s own words without giving him the platform. It also shows how much the defense learned from Trial #1. They weren’t about to “over-try” the case again or take on burdens that aren’t theirs. Their job wasn’t to prove Karen’s innocence beyond all doubt it was to expose reasonable doubt in the Commonwealth’s case. And they did that without falling into traps. Bottom line: Proctor never testified, but his texts did. And in the end, those texts did more damage than his spin ever could. David Yannetti @Defense_Dia

Dixie Normus

51,712 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr

🚨 ERIKA KIRK IS CELEBRATING A MAJOR WIN AS CHARLIE'S ASSASSINATION CASE TAKES A SHOCKING TURN — "WE HAVE A HELL OF A TEAM" The Charlie Kirk case just got even more controversial. The judge has reportedly granted immunity to Lance Twiggs for the preliminary hearing while denying the defense's effort to compel his testimony. Prosecutors can reportedly rely on Lance's statements to help establish probable cause. But the defense won't get to question him. The ruling states that preliminary hearings are not discovery proceedings and that prosecutors are permitted to rely on reliable hearsay to establish probable cause. Translation? The state can reportedly use Lance's version of events. The defense can't challenge him. At least not yet. Meanwhile, prosecutors continue pointing to DNA evidence they say connects Tyler Robinson to the weapon, fired casing, unfired rounds, and other key items. Defense attorneys argue they still have not received all of the physical and electronic evidence underlying those claims. That's where things get messy. One side says the evidence is overwhelming. The other says they still haven't seen everything being used to support the case. And through it all, Erika Kirk says she has "a hell of a team", has full faith in the justice system and believes the truth will come out. Now Lance has immunity. The subpoena is gone. The defense is blocked from questioning him. And the debate surrounding this case just got even louder. What's the most shocking part of this... the immunity, the evidence dispute, or the fact that Lance's statements can reportedly be used without the defense questioning him?
2:20

🚨 ERIKA KIRK IS CELEBRATING A MAJOR WIN AS CHARLIE'S ASSASSINATION CASE TAKES A SHOCKING TURN — "WE HAVE A HELL OF A TEAM" The Charlie Kirk case just got even more controversial. The judge has reportedly granted immunity to Lance Twiggs for the preliminary hearing while denying the defense's effort to compel his testimony. Prosecutors can reportedly rely on Lance's statements to help establish probable cause. But the defense won't get to question him. The ruling states that preliminary hearings are not discovery proceedings and that prosecutors are permitted to rely on reliable hearsay to establish probable cause. Translation? The state can reportedly use Lance's version of events. The defense can't challenge him. At least not yet. Meanwhile, prosecutors continue pointing to DNA evidence they say connects Tyler Robinson to the weapon, fired casing, unfired rounds, and other key items. Defense attorneys argue they still have not received all of the physical and electronic evidence underlying those claims. That's where things get messy. One side says the evidence is overwhelming. The other says they still haven't seen everything being used to support the case. And through it all, Erika Kirk says she has "a hell of a team", has full faith in the justice system and believes the truth will come out. Now Lance has immunity. The subpoena is gone. The defense is blocked from questioning him. And the debate surrounding this case just got even louder. What's the most shocking part of this... the immunity, the evidence dispute, or the fact that Lance's statements can reportedly be used without the defense questioning him?

HustleBitch

23,159 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten

The Lil Durk trial has finally started with jury selection, nearly two years after he was arrested for murder-for-hire in connection with an attempted hit on Quando Rondo that took the life of the rapper's cousin. The judge is reportedly allowing background checks on potential jurors. On Thursday (Aug. 20), the Chicago rapper appeared in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California for the first day of what is expected to be a complicated and lengthy trial, as the defense and prosecution tried to cut the potential jury pool of 80 people down to 16 (12 sitting jurors and four alternates). According to attorney Moe Gangat, who was present during the hearing, Durk's defense team successfully argued that background checks should be done on potential jurors to probe for any bias, despite opposition from the prosecution. Potential jurors have been given a questionnaire to fill out. They will be questioned about their answers on Friday (Aug. 21). 🎥: lawyer4workers
2:31

The Lil Durk trial has finally started with jury selection, nearly two years after he was arrested for murder-for-hire in connection with an attempted hit on Quando Rondo that took the life of the rapper's cousin. The judge is reportedly allowing background checks on potential jurors. On Thursday (Aug. 20), the Chicago rapper appeared in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California for the first day of what is expected to be a complicated and lengthy trial, as the defense and prosecution tried to cut the potential jury pool of 80 people down to 16 (12 sitting jurors and four alternates). According to attorney Moe Gangat, who was present during the hearing, Durk's defense team successfully argued that background checks should be done on potential jurors to probe for any bias, despite opposition from the prosecution. Potential jurors have been given a questionnaire to fill out. They will be questioned about their answers on Friday (Aug. 21). 🎥: lawyer4workers

XXL Magazine

48,620 Aufrufe • vor 6 Tagen

🚨PIPE BOMBER HEARING: “THIS CASE DOESN’T ADD UP” LindellTV's Cara Castronuova and Ivan Raiklin were just inside the courtroom for the Brian Cole Jr. pipe bomber status hearing and here are the major takeaways. The judge got visibly emotional and raised his voice at defense counsel over a protective order - after the government tried to block evidence from entering the public record. Raiklin's read? They're trying to cover up any evidence tied to federal assets or CHS operatives on January 5th and 6th. Brian Cole Jr. spoke for the first time - pleading NOT GUILTY to both charges. The defense is pushing for a DECEMBER TRIAL DATE - meaning they're not pleading out. Raiklin's take: "The defense is telling the government: we're not accepting these charges, we're going to trial, and we're going to prove our client is not guilty. There's so many holes in the government's story." On a DC jury pool convicting Cole: "I don't see any way. There's too much reasonable doubt. If he doesn't plead out - there's no way he gets convicted." The gait analysis exposed by Steve Baker. The missing evidence. The government scrambling. This case is unraveling. And we're not looking away.
4:17

🚨PIPE BOMBER HEARING: “THIS CASE DOESN’T ADD UP” LindellTV's Cara Castronuova and Ivan Raiklin were just inside the courtroom for the Brian Cole Jr. pipe bomber status hearing and here are the major takeaways. The judge got visibly emotional and raised his voice at defense counsel over a protective order - after the government tried to block evidence from entering the public record. Raiklin's read? They're trying to cover up any evidence tied to federal assets or CHS operatives on January 5th and 6th. Brian Cole Jr. spoke for the first time - pleading NOT GUILTY to both charges. The defense is pushing for a DECEMBER TRIAL DATE - meaning they're not pleading out. Raiklin's take: "The defense is telling the government: we're not accepting these charges, we're going to trial, and we're going to prove our client is not guilty. There's so many holes in the government's story." On a DC jury pool convicting Cole: "I don't see any way. There's too much reasonable doubt. If he doesn't plead out - there's no way he gets convicted." The gait analysis exposed by Steve Baker. The missing evidence. The government scrambling. This case is unraveling. And we're not looking away.

LindellTV

16,694 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten

🚨 LINDSAY CLANCY TRIAL UPDATE Defense is in full swing on the insanity claim. Her attorney says they’ll finish with doctors today and may rest the case tomorrow. They’re also bringing in a former McLean Hospital employee who posted a viral TikTok slamming the facility for being understaffed when Clancy checked herself in. Prosecutors spent weeks laying out the killings. The defense only has to raise reasonable doubt about her mental state. Jury will decide if she knew what she was doing when she murdered her own children.
3:26

🚨 LINDSAY CLANCY TRIAL UPDATE Defense is in full swing on the insanity claim. Her attorney says they’ll finish with doctors today and may rest the case tomorrow. They’re also bringing in a former McLean Hospital employee who posted a viral TikTok slamming the facility for being understaffed when Clancy checked herself in. Prosecutors spent weeks laying out the killings. The defense only has to raise reasonable doubt about her mental state. Jury will decide if she knew what she was doing when she murdered her own children.

Gunther Eagleman™

519,875 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen

Tyler Robinson's DEFENSE Team Files New Motion For CONTEMPT After Officials Continue To Talk PUBLICLY About The Case—In Violation Of Gag Order ⚖️ We've just obtained a new explosive new 16-page motion filed by Tyler Robinson’s legal team. The defense is officially asking the Court to hold Utah County Attorney Jeffrey S. Gray and Deputy County Attorney Chris Ballard in Contempt of Court. The establishment is playing a dangerous game with the right to a fair trial, and we have the receipts on their "contemptuous public relations campaign". THE VIOLATIONS: PROSECUTORS AS "ORACLES" Despite a strict Pre-Trial Publicity Order issued back in September 2025 (and amended in December), the defense alleges the prosecution has been on a calculated media tour to slant the case. On March 31, 2026, Chris Ballard spoke to TMZ, claiming the State has "ample evidence to demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt that Tyler Robinson committed this murder". Ballard then appeared on Fox News, USA Today, and Politifact to "explain away" the inconclusive ATF ballistics report. The motion argues that publicly declaring they have enough evidence for a conviction is the functional equivalent of stating the defendant is "guilty"—a direct violation of Rule 3.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct. THE PRECEDE: THE LEAVITT ROADMAP The defense is using a "shockingly similar" case from Utah County—Leavitt v. Office of Professional Conduct—as a roadmap for sanctions. In that case, an elected prosecutor was disqualified from a capital case for making authoritative, prejudicial statements to the press. The State tried to "erect a firewall" around their communications with the media, objecting to Robinson’s request for their internal emails and call logs. The defense is now asking the Court to COMPEL the production of: 1⃣ All written statements to media entities since March 26, 2026. 2⃣ Internal communications discussing the drafting and approving of these public statements.+1 THE BOTTOM LINE: The prosecution knows the ATF report was "inconclusive" regarding the bullet fragments. Instead of letting the evidence speak in court, they took to the airwaves to poison the jury pool. If the government can’t follow its own court orders, how can we trust them with the "integrity of the court system"? Tyler Robinson's team is calling for a "Show Cause" hearing to hold these prosecutors accountable. Special Thanks to Andrea Burkhart 🐟🐟🐟🐟🏴‍☠️ for providing the documents.
0:32

Tyler Robinson's DEFENSE Team Files New Motion For CONTEMPT After Officials Continue To Talk PUBLICLY About The Case—In Violation Of Gag Order ⚖️ We've just obtained a new explosive new 16-page motion filed by Tyler Robinson’s legal team. The defense is officially asking the Court to hold Utah County Attorney Jeffrey S. Gray and Deputy County Attorney Chris Ballard in Contempt of Court. The establishment is playing a dangerous game with the right to a fair trial, and we have the receipts on their "contemptuous public relations campaign". THE VIOLATIONS: PROSECUTORS AS "ORACLES" Despite a strict Pre-Trial Publicity Order issued back in September 2025 (and amended in December), the defense alleges the prosecution has been on a calculated media tour to slant the case. On March 31, 2026, Chris Ballard spoke to TMZ, claiming the State has "ample evidence to demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt that Tyler Robinson committed this murder". Ballard then appeared on Fox News, USA Today, and Politifact to "explain away" the inconclusive ATF ballistics report. The motion argues that publicly declaring they have enough evidence for a conviction is the functional equivalent of stating the defendant is "guilty"—a direct violation of Rule 3.6 of the Rules of Professional Conduct. THE PRECEDE: THE LEAVITT ROADMAP The defense is using a "shockingly similar" case from Utah County—Leavitt v. Office of Professional Conduct—as a roadmap for sanctions. In that case, an elected prosecutor was disqualified from a capital case for making authoritative, prejudicial statements to the press. The State tried to "erect a firewall" around their communications with the media, objecting to Robinson’s request for their internal emails and call logs. The defense is now asking the Court to COMPEL the production of: 1⃣ All written statements to media entities since March 26, 2026. 2⃣ Internal communications discussing the drafting and approving of these public statements.+1 THE BOTTOM LINE: The prosecution knows the ATF report was "inconclusive" regarding the bullet fragments. Instead of letting the evidence speak in court, they took to the airwaves to poison the jury pool. If the government can’t follow its own court orders, how can we trust them with the "integrity of the court system"? Tyler Robinson's team is calling for a "Show Cause" hearing to hold these prosecutors accountable. Special Thanks to Andrea Burkhart 🐟🐟🐟🐟🏴‍☠️ for providing the documents.

Project Constitution

23,075 Aufrufe • vor 4 Monaten