正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

The demand was simple but devastating. Create a backdoor into iCloud that would let the UK government access any user's data. Not just UK citizens. All 1.5 billion Apple users worldwide. The penalties for refusing were brutal:

794,173 次观看 • 9 个月前 •via X (Twitter)

0 条评论

暂无评论

原始帖子的评论将显示在这里

相关视频

10 Shocking Stories the Media Buried This Week #10 – UK government BUSTED in a secret plot to extract personal data from 2 billion iPhone users. They were this close to your “encrypted” data. This story begins when the UK govt hit Apple with a secret gag order, forcing them to either backdoor encrypted data for billions of users or face criminal charges if they refused to comply. Apple couldn’t even talk about it. The order demanded Apple create a vulnerability in its iCloud encryption, which would have given the UK government a back door to financial information, health records, and private conversations—not just of UK citizens but of two billion iPhone users worldwide. Remember, the UK government has already tried to threaten and extradite individuals outside the UK for violating British censorship laws—including US citizens over their online posts. So what happens when governments push to punish you not just for what you say publicly but for what you say privately? Rather than handing over the data of 2 billion iPhone users to the UK government, Apple chose to pull its Advanced Data Protection (ADP) in the UK—removing the option for UK users to enable encryption. Existing UK users must now disable encryption, and new users won’t have the option at all. US citizens and people in other countries remain unaffected by the UK government’s dystopian push to surveil and censor speech—for now. The UK government was this close to surveilling you, too—but luckily, Sayer Ji, Elon Musk, and The Wall Street Journal exposed this privacy nightmare. In another disturbing development, Imran Ahmed of the CCDH—one of the leading architects of the UK’s war on speech—is being awarded for his Orwellian efforts with a $300,000 prize this May. Sayer Ji has put together a petition to oppose this absurd aggrandizement of someone who has worked tirelessly to annihilate personal freedoms and silence dissenting voices. You can sign that petition here: (See 9 More Revealing Stories Below)

The Vigilant Fox 🦊

1,158,880 次观看 • 1 年前

The UK Government Just Lost Its War on Your Privacy. Here's How America Stopped It. A chilling precedent was just set—and then defeated. The UK government, under its authoritarian Online Safety Act, made an unprecedented global power grab. They demanded Apple create a "backdoor" to break into the encrypted data of ANY user, ANYWHERE in the world. iCloud photos, messages, notes—nothing would be safe. They wanted the keys to the kingdom. Apple's response? They refused to compromise their users' security and instead REMOVED Advanced Data Protection entirely for UK citizens. They chose to deny a service rather than build a tool for tyranny. This is how they always operate: they sell these draconian measures by targeting "pedophiles" and "criminals." But in reality, who do they arrest? People criticizing the government. People questioning protests. People sharing "wrong" memes. It was never about safety; it was about control. But here's the update that proves the global stakes of this fight: The UK has BACKED DOWN. Why? Because of direct intervention from the United States. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard, alongside the President and VP, engaged in high-level talks to protect AMERICAN citizens from this foreign overreach. The result? The UK has DROPPED its mandate. For now, our private data remains private. Our constitutional rights were defended on the world stage. This is a stark reminder: ➤ The fight for free speech and privacy is now global. Digital borders are meaningless to authoritarians. ➤ Your security was protected because a company (Apple) said NO and a government (the U.S.) had the will to stand up for its principles. ➤ The UK's Online Safety Act is still active, creating a digital dark age for British citizens. Platforms like Gab have already completely BLOCKED all UK users to protect them from government coercion and jail time for "hate speech." The question every American must ask: Would this have happened under an administration that openly advocates for censoring "misinformation" and monitoring online speech? The UK's best hope, according to free speech advocates there, now lies with the Trump administration. The beacon of freedom is still burning, but it is under constant attack. This victory is critical, but the war for the soul of the internet is far from over.

Camus

12,945 次观看 • 9 个月前