正在加载视频...

视频加载失败

加载此视频时出现问题。这可能是由于临时网络问题，或视频可能不可用。

The difference between GPT-6 Astra and Fable 5.1 is obvious here. Same prompt, both building a website with real-time fluid physics. Move the cursor and the water reacts, waves spread, run into each other, and slowly flatten out. Built end to end on Higgsfield Supercomputer.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

228,454 subscribers

45,109 次观看 • 7 天前 •via X (Twitter)

艺术科学技术游戏

Anya Rossi• Live Now

Private livecam show

20 条评论

Luke || The HYPE Critic 的头像

Luke || The HYPE Critic7 天前

every single one of these “comparison” posts from random tools is one attempt, one prompt, one cherry picked frame. zero variable control, zero reproducibility. this is just vibes benchmarking as a genre at this point, exists purely for the engagement farm

Zylen Tach 的头像

Zylen Tach7 天前

astra is quicker and more reactive fable looks more physical in this one

Wren Castellan 的头像

Wren Castellan7 天前

the fluid physics demo is pretty satisfying 👀 if astra can build that kind of interaction from one prompt, i'm way more interested in the code quality behind it than the side-by-side screenshot.

MeridianXM 的头像

MeridianXM6 天前

Does Claude actually claim to be good at water physics & high end graphical website development? Seems like Astra is good at making things pretty, games, water physics, 3d, etc. Claude seems better at taking those & making them into an actual product. Better to use both.

haydar 的头像

haydar7 天前

fable take the w here

liquidated (Dev Arc) 的头像

liquidated (Dev Arc)7 天前

both get the job done but one clearly thought about the physics before writing a line of code

𝗦𝗤𝗗𝗜𝗤𝗫 的头像

𝗦𝗤𝗗𝗜𝗤𝗫7 天前

For obvious reasons, I still prefer fable 5

AI Mastery Guide 的头像

AI Mastery Guide7 天前

water physics looking unreal ngl

Osman Hekimoğlu 的头像

Osman Hekimoğlu7 天前

I highly recommend adding an Image to 3D mesh gen model to the platform. Are there any plans for this soon??

haydar 的头像

haydar7 天前

fable wins the look astra wins the speed

Webster | JARVIS 的头像

Webster | JARVIS7 天前

damn that water sim is smooth. the wave interaction looks way more natural on the fable one what kind of physics engine are they using under the hood?

mayank_tfs 的头像

mayank_tfs7 天前

Hmm what is this

Zylen Tach 的头像

Zylen Tach7 天前

I need dm

haydar 的头像

haydar7 天前

astra is quicker and more reactive fable looks more physical in this one

bmxsoulbrother 的头像

bmxsoulbrother7 天前

@higgsfield_ai @higgsfield why does my Global Film Festival project not show up on the main community page even though I made it public? The film is called The Naughty List.

Chestuits 的头像

Chestuits7 天前

Interactive physics exposes differences static demos can hide

Eva Morgan 的头像

Eva Morgan7 天前

Feeling more like real environments.

Viktoria 的头像

Viktoria7 天前

Why are you guys embarrassing fable??

Marcel 的头像

Marcel7 天前

😧😧 crazy

Sean 的头像

Sean7 天前

Wow this is amazing difference

相关视频

GPT-6 Astra holds up on 3D and game logic. This is a playable FPS it built end to end on Higgsfield Supercomputer.

GPT-6 Astra holds up on 3D and game logic. This is a playable FPS it built end to end on Higgsfield Supercomputer.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

21,658 次观看 • 8 天前

GPT-6 Astra is the strongest model for 3D game from a single prompt. We described the game in one sentence > GPT-6 Astra wrote the whole thing - drift physics, combo scoring, near-miss bonuses, speed traps, nitro > out came Street Heat, a full arcade racer running in the browser. The whole pipeline ran end-to-end on Higgsfield Supercomputer.

GPT-6 Astra is the strongest model for 3D game from a single prompt. We described the game in one sentence > GPT-6 Astra wrote the whole thing - drift physics, combo scoring, near-miss bonuses, speed traps, nitro > out came Street Heat, a full arcade racer running in the browser. The whole pipeline ran end-to-end on Higgsfield Supercomputer.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

174,098 次观看 • 7 天前

MY FIRST GAME OUTPUT WITH GPT-6 ASTRA IT ONE-SHOTTED THIS CALL OF DUTY GAME IN 30 MINUTES!!! GPT-6 ASTRA IS THE FASTEST MODEL ON THE MARKET. THE SAME PROMPT TOOK FABLE 5.1 ALMOST 5 HRS AND IT CONSUMED A FRACTION OF THE TOKENS FABLE 5.1 DID.

MY FIRST GAME OUTPUT WITH GPT-6 ASTRA IT ONE-SHOTTED THIS CALL OF DUTY GAME IN 30 MINUTES!!! GPT-6 ASTRA IS THE FASTEST MODEL ON THE MARKET. THE SAME PROMPT TOOK FABLE 5.1 ALMOST 5 HRS AND IT CONSUMED A FRACTION OF THE TOKENS FABLE 5.1 DID.

hiraeth

36,888 次观看 • 7 天前

GPT-6 Astra turned a single floor plan into a full 3D walkthrough. It reconstructed the layout in Blender, furnished every room, lit the scene with natural light, and rendered the tour with ray tracing. Made end to end on Higgsfield Supercomputer.

GPT-6 Astra turned a single floor plan into a full 3D walkthrough. It reconstructed the layout in Blender, furnished every room, lit the scene with natural light, and rendered the tour with ray tracing. Made end to end on Higgsfield Supercomputer.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

58,163 次观看 • 8 天前

GPT-6 Astra smokes Claude Fable 5.1 in Blender 💨 We compared GPT-6 Astra and Fable 5.1 on a Porsche 911 GT3 RS build and the difference is visible from the very first shot Output: Astra: $132.03 • 2.58 hours Fable: $114.41 • 2.56 hours Astra's model is not only more detailed in every aspect, but also far closer to the original car, costing almost the same as Fable's blocky funny looking model, the difference is astonishing

GPT-6 Astra smokes Claude Fable 5.1 in Blender 💨 We compared GPT-6 Astra and Fable 5.1 on a Porsche 911 GT3 RS build and the difference is visible from the very first shot Output: Astra: $132.03 • 2.58 hours Fable: $114.41 • 2.56 hours Astra's model is not only more detailed in every aspect, but also far closer to the original car, costing almost the same as Fable's blocky funny looking model, the difference is astonishing

atomic.chat

130,515 次观看 • 4 天前

I asked Astra (GPT-6) and Fable 5.1 both to build GTA VI like game researching about it, and the results are below. Same prompt. Fable took ~2 hours; Astra took ~90 minutes. Watch the full gameplay side by side below, with audio switching every 10 seconds

I asked Astra (GPT-6) and Fable 5.1 both to build GTA VI like game researching about it, and the results are below. Same prompt. Fable took ~2 hours; Astra took ~90 minutes. Watch the full gameplay side by side below, with audio switching every 10 seconds

Mehul Mohan

320,142 次观看 • 8 天前

I ran this locally with GLM-5.3 Flash EXL3 on my DGX Sparks, and I think it beats both Fable 5.1 and GPT-6 Astra. The crazy part: it was faster to make create this on my sparks than it was with either Fable 5.1 or Astra. Live link here:

I ran this locally with GLM-5.3 Flash EXL3 on my DGX Sparks, and I think it beats both Fable 5.1 and GPT-6 Astra. The crazy part: it was faster to make create this on my sparks than it was with either Fable 5.1 or Astra. Live link here:

Mia

46,251 次观看 • 3 天前

GPT-6 Astra + Unreal Engine = AAA shooter. Astra built a first-person arena shooter with enemy waves, multiple weapons, pickups and a full combat HUD. Higgsfield generated all the assets.

GPT-6 Astra + Unreal Engine = AAA shooter. Astra built a first-person arena shooter with enemy waves, multiple weapons, pickups and a full combat HUD. Higgsfield generated all the assets.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

21,307 次观看 • 3 天前

Fable 5.1 charges 6× more than GPT-5.6 Sol anthropic's Fable 5.1 went live. we threw it straight at openai's GPT-5.6 Sol. same prompts, one shot. the test: five self-contained three.js scenes, one continuous project — a futuristic mansion on a private island. exterior orbit, grand hall with a diamond chandelier, pool with a water park, garage with 10 lambos, helicopter landing on the roof cost: Claude Fable 5.1 — $5.69 GPT-5.6 Sol — $0.88 what we saw: • fable goes for realism — waves, depth, a sand ring around the island. sol goes low-poly and clean, and its style never breaks across all 5 scenes • fable's chandelier is thousands of individual crystals. sol's hall is honestly just a staircase and a wall • fable's helicopter touches down on the lit helipad much smoother than sol's • fable built a triple-slide water-park tower — and shipped the pool with no water. sol's park is tiny — but the pool is full 6× the price buys you 6× the detail — and the same one-shot bugs. what's your choice? try Fable 5.1 on aimlapi[.]com

Fable 5.1 charges 6× more than GPT-5.6 Sol anthropic's Fable 5.1 went live. we threw it straight at openai's GPT-5.6 Sol. same prompts, one shot. the test: five self-contained three.js scenes, one continuous project — a futuristic mansion on a private island. exterior orbit, grand hall with a diamond chandelier, pool with a water park, garage with 10 lambos, helicopter landing on the roof cost: Claude Fable 5.1 — $5.69 GPT-5.6 Sol — $0.88 what we saw: • fable goes for realism — waves, depth, a sand ring around the island. sol goes low-poly and clean, and its style never breaks across all 5 scenes • fable's chandelier is thousands of individual crystals. sol's hall is honestly just a staircase and a wall • fable's helicopter touches down on the lit helipad much smoother than sol's • fable built a triple-slide water-park tower — and shipped the pool with no water. sol's park is tiny — but the pool is full 6× the price buys you 6× the detail — and the same one-shot bugs. what's your choice? try Fable 5.1 on aimlapi[.]com

AI/ML API

403,637 次观看 • 10 天前

holy f**k, this is insane GPT-6 Astra and Claude Fable 5.1 are free on Xplabs right now what you get: - GPT-6 Astra free - Claude Fable 5.1 free - and 1000+ models open on the platform how to try (under 1 min): step 1: go to step 2: search for gpt-6-astra or fable-5.1 step 3: select it and start chatting no plan required, no per-model payment, just pick and go

holy f**k, this is insane GPT-6 Astra and Claude Fable 5.1 are free on Xplabs right now what you get: - GPT-6 Astra free - Claude Fable 5.1 free - and 1000+ models open on the platform how to try (under 1 min): step 1: go to step 2: search for gpt-6-astra or fable-5.1 step 3: select it and start chatting no plan required, no per-model payment, just pick and go

Sakata

43,995 次观看 • 2 天前

We made a music video end to end on Higgsfield Supercomputer with Seedance 2.0 in 4K. Fable 5 planned the choreography, helped with locations and the details, cut the track, and prompted every shot itself. Watch the full clip:

We made a music video end to end on Higgsfield Supercomputer with Seedance 2.0 in 4K. Fable 5 planned the choreography, helped with locations and the details, cut the track, and prompted every shot itself. Watch the full clip:

Higgsfield AI 🧩

43,200 次观看 • 2 个月前

GPT-6 Astra vibe-coded a playable chase and put it online right away. From a single prompt it wrote the car physics, the police behavior, the traffic, the checkpoints and the scoring, then brought the whole thing up at a live link. That is what AGI looks like at work. Made with Higgsfield + GPT-6 Astra.

GPT-6 Astra vibe-coded a playable chase and put it online right away. From a single prompt it wrote the car physics, the police behavior, the traffic, the checkpoints and the scoring, then brought the whole thing up at a live link. That is what AGI looks like at work. Made with Higgsfield + GPT-6 Astra.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

12,524 次观看 • 6 天前

GPT Astra just cooked Claude Fable 5.1 — for a lower price! OpenAI just rolled out GPT‑6 Astra — we put it against Anthropic's Fable 5.1 Both models got the same four briefs: Earth colliding with Mars, a tall ship sucked into a giant whirlpool, Godzilla leveling downtown, a mega-tsunami swallowing a city. One self-contained HTML file per scene, one shot, no edits. GPT Astra: 25,159 tokens, $1.67 Claude Fable 5.1: 37,767 tokens, $2.51 both models live on aimlapi[.]com — 1000+ models, one key.

GPT Astra just cooked Claude Fable 5.1 — for a lower price! OpenAI just rolled out GPT‑6 Astra — we put it against Anthropic's Fable 5.1 Both models got the same four briefs: Earth colliding with Mars, a tall ship sucked into a giant whirlpool, Godzilla leveling downtown, a mega-tsunami swallowing a city. One self-contained HTML file per scene, one shot, no edits. GPT Astra: 25,159 tokens, $1.67 Claude Fable 5.1: 37,767 tokens, $2.51 both models live on aimlapi[.]com — 1000+ models, one key.

AI/ML API

86,636 次观看 • 7 天前

"You have a data center full of geniuses and now you make them use the same desktop and move the same mouse cursor?" Some raw thoughts on the GPT-6 Astra launch.

"You have a data center full of geniuses and now you make them use the same desktop and move the same mouse cursor?" Some raw thoughts on the GPT-6 Astra launch.

Thorsten Ball

17,298 次观看 • 7 天前

Sanji shares his Higgsfield Supercomputer playbook to run marketing end-to-end. He lets the agent analyze his niche, find the winning formula, generate 100+ variations, and run A/B tests at scale, with the agent learning from every run. How do you use Supercomputer for scaling?

Sanji shares his Higgsfield Supercomputer playbook to run marketing end-to-end. He lets the agent analyze his niche, find the winning formula, generate 100+ variations, and run A/B tests at scale, with the agent learning from every run. How do you use Supercomputer for scaling?

Higgsfield AI 🧩

115,336 次观看 • 3 个月前

Fable 5 does crazy things on Supercomputer. A Higgsfield creator built an app that blocks 3D scenes, records a real cinema camera move, and renders the video through Seedance 2.0. A 15-second clay pass carries the exact trajectory, timing, and framing a prompt keeps losing.

Fable 5 does crazy things on Supercomputer. A Higgsfield creator built an app that blocks 3D scenes, records a real cinema camera move, and renders the video through Seedance 2.0. A 15-second clay pass carries the exact trajectory, timing, and framing a prompt keeps losing.

Higgsfield AI 🧩

146,164 次观看 • 2 个月前

New Fable 5 beats Opus 4.8 on real world physics simulations We gave both models the same three prompts and asked them to build self contained HTML5 sims with real physics and no libraries: 1. Chaotic double pendulum 2. Galton board 3. Water in a spinning drum (WCSPH) Generation cost Fable 5: $3.35 on 68.7k tokens, time 14m 47s Opus 4.8: $0.93 on 38.9k tokens, time 8m 10s Fable clearly did better on the water simulation, producing a much more solid and continuous body of water. Opus left larger gaps near the walls, scattered particles around the scene, and struggled to keep the fluid stable.

New Fable 5 beats Opus 4.8 on real world physics simulations We gave both models the same three prompts and asked them to build self contained HTML5 sims with real physics and no libraries: 1. Chaotic double pendulum 2. Galton board 3. Water in a spinning drum (WCSPH) Generation cost Fable 5: $3.35 on 68.7k tokens, time 14m 47s Opus 4.8: $0.93 on 38.9k tokens, time 8m 10s Fable clearly did better on the water simulation, producing a much more solid and continuous body of water. Opus left larger gaps near the walls, scattered particles around the scene, and struggled to keep the fluid stable.

atomic.chat

1,587,969 次观看 • 3 个月前

They set traps for each other…never realizing they were slowly trapping their own hearts. What began as rivalry turned into something neither of them could escape.They didn’t just fall into the trap…they fell into each other. And in the end…between pride, rivalry and games played with fragile feelings—who won? NO ONE 💔 Just two hearts losing at the same time. THE WATER TRUTH REVEALED #นทีร้อยเล่ห์ตอนที่6

They set traps for each other…never realizing they were slowly trapping their own hearts. What began as rivalry turned into something neither of them could escape.They didn’t just fall into the trap…they fell into each other. And in the end…between pride, rivalry and games played with fragile feelings—who won? NO ONE 💔 Just two hearts losing at the same time. THE WATER TRUTH REVEALED #นทีร้อยเล่ห์ตอนที่6

Beee🐝

13,155 次观看 • 4 个月前

Someone gave Astra 6 and Fable 5.1 the exact same prompt: “build me GTA” Both had to autonomously build a browser open-world game where you can walk around, steal cars, drive through traffic and crash them. Fable 5.1: ~6h 15m 4.58M tokens 13 implementer + 19 reviewer agents Astra 6: ~55 min of actual work 7.23M tokens 1 agent And Astra produced the noticeably better game. One-shot game generation is becoming a surprisingly useful benchmark for coding agents.

Someone gave Astra 6 and Fable 5.1 the exact same prompt: “build me GTA” Both had to autonomously build a browser open-world game where you can walk around, steal cars, drive through traffic and crash them. Fable 5.1: ~6h 15m 4.58M tokens 13 implementer + 19 reviewer agents Astra 6: ~55 min of actual work 7.23M tokens 1 agent And Astra produced the noticeably better game. One-shot game generation is becoming a surprisingly useful benchmark for coding agents.

Hakimi Eiqbal

30,638 次观看 • 19 小时前

GPT-6 Astra makes amazing background painting. It takes full control of a Wacom Cintiq 22, professional drawing tablet, then plugs straight into Photoshop through the Higgsfield Plugin, and draws a nighttime cityscape in comic book style end-to-end. What a time to be alive!

GPT-6 Astra makes amazing background painting. It takes full control of a Wacom Cintiq 22, professional drawing tablet, then plugs straight into Photoshop through the Higgsfield Plugin, and draws a nighttime cityscape in comic book style end-to-end. What a time to be alive!

Higgsfield AI 🧩

42,952 次观看 • 5 天前