Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

The difference between rhetoric and dialectic. “That’s offensive” is meaningless rhetoric. This is something that you will benefit greatly from understanding.

17,252 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)

8 Kommentare

Profilbild von Roberto
Robertovor 1 Jahr

It’s necessary for us to be overtly offensive now. What was once thought of as self-censoring to be kind, is now known to be about control. The communist fences you in with language. Time to call people retarded.

Profilbild von Rock Paper Sizzle
Rock Paper Sizzlevor 1 Jahr

💪If you're seeing this, it must mean you support Trump. 👏 Let us help you show it. ✅ Classic, Tough, Real American Gear Here:

Profilbild von Djek Deign
Djek Deignvor 1 Jahr

Big Bear I really liked your video but being a grammar Graham I have to point out that the correct use is "for whom" and not "for who", "who for" would also do.

Profilbild von RE:Peter
RE:Petervor 1 Jahr

Close but terms are off. You are describing the difference between a enthymemes and syllogisms. An enthymeme is a statement that requires you to both understand the sentiment. So saying "That's offensive" is a rhetorical enthymeme because you haven't explained why with logic.

Profilbild von Ming Yin
Ming Yinvor 1 Jahr

Good for Yeti make Yeti strong

Profilbild von Kerrin Naude
Kerrin Naudevor 1 Jahr

All true.

Profilbild von Generic Midwesterner
Generic Midwesternervor 1 Jahr

When people say things like that, I ask them to articulate why. Usually they can't.

Profilbild von Robert Connolly
Robert Connollyvor 1 Jahr

I get why you would want to leave Hollywood and live off the land and homestead.... why are you still hanging on you won ......

Ähnliche Videos