Video yükleniyor...

Video Yüklenemedi

Ana Sayfaya Dön

The difference between rhetoric and dialectic. “That’s offensive” is meaningless rhetoric. This is something that you will benefit greatly from understanding.

17,252 görüntüleme • 1 yıl önce •via X (Twitter)

8 Yorum

Roberto profil fotoğrafı
Roberto1 yıl önce

It’s necessary for us to be overtly offensive now. What was once thought of as self-censoring to be kind, is now known to be about control. The communist fences you in with language. Time to call people retarded.

Rock Paper Sizzle profil fotoğrafı
Rock Paper Sizzle1 yıl önce

💪If you're seeing this, it must mean you support Trump. 👏 Let us help you show it. ✅ Classic, Tough, Real American Gear Here:

Djek Deign profil fotoğrafı
Djek Deign1 yıl önce

Big Bear I really liked your video but being a grammar Graham I have to point out that the correct use is "for whom" and not "for who", "who for" would also do.

RE:Peter profil fotoğrafı
RE:Peter1 yıl önce

Close but terms are off. You are describing the difference between a enthymemes and syllogisms. An enthymeme is a statement that requires you to both understand the sentiment. So saying "That's offensive" is a rhetorical enthymeme because you haven't explained why with logic.

Ming Yin profil fotoğrafı
Ming Yin1 yıl önce

Good for Yeti make Yeti strong

Kerrin Naude profil fotoğrafı
Kerrin Naude1 yıl önce

All true.

Generic Midwesterner profil fotoğrafı
Generic Midwesterner1 yıl önce

When people say things like that, I ask them to articulate why. Usually they can't.

Robert Connolly profil fotoğrafı
Robert Connolly1 yıl önce

I get why you would want to leave Hollywood and live off the land and homestead.... why are you still hanging on you won ......

Benzer Videolar