Video wird geladen...

Video konnte nicht geladen werden

Zur Startseite

The difference between traders who get funded and traders who keep buying challenges is usually their Risk Framework. The 50/20 Rule isn’t a strategy. It’s a risk model that has helped countless traders stop blowing accounts and start receiving consistent payouts. It’s also helped me generate over $150,000 in...

32,955 Aufrufe • vor 2 Monaten •via X (Twitter)

0 Kommentare

Keine Kommentare verfügbar

Kommentare vom Original-Post werden hier angezeigt

Ähnliche Videos

There’s a truth prop firms don’t tell traders… And many traders don’t even realize it. Let me spill it. To get a $100K prop firm account, you usually pay $1,500 – $2,500. A $1M account can cost $5,000 – $20,000. But here’s the catch: Most prop firms offer 1:20 – 1:50 leverage Maybe 1:100 at best. Then they add: • Daily drawdown limits • Maximum drawdown rules • Strict risk parameters So what does that really mean? Even though it says $100K account, the usable risk capital is closer to ~$5K–$7K. That’s the real buying power you’re trading with. Now think about this: Most traders on a $100K funded account withdraw around $5K – $20K during payouts. But ask yourself honestly… Have you ever seen someone withdraw $100K from a $100K account? Rare. Now consider the time cost: • Phase 1 • Phase 2 • Sometimes Phase 3 During those stages you might make great profits — but it’s all on demo. You get nothing for it. Now imagine this instead: If you took that $2,500 challenge fee And traded your own capital with the same strategy… Could you scale it to $5K, $10K, even $20K in a few months? Many traders probably could. Another truth most people don’t talk about: Some prop firms copy trades from profitable traders on the backend and make multiples of what the trader earns. So they profit from: • Challenge fees • Failed accounts • And even your winning trades Which makes you wonder… Should traders actually be paying prop firms? Or should prop firms be looking for traders for free? Just something to think about. Not financial advice. Just my personal perspective as a trader.

Bonafide Brand

26,212 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten

#WATCH | Mumbai, Maharashtra: When asked about how 3:15 PM cutoffs and closing auction price spreads are disrupting his algorithmic hedging and intraday risk management, with Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) confirming Closing Auction Session (CAS) is permanent, Shrikant Chouhan, Head of Equity Research, Kotak Securities, says, "...If we go through with the CAS-related issues which are giving some kind of uneasiness for option traders... this time option traders, they are mainly affected. The reason is that between this time gap, the prices change a lot, and because of that, most of the time on the day of expiry, especially on the day of expiry, it actually impacts option traders, those who are like writers. Broadly, we are of the view that at present SEBI is holding a lot of meetings with brokers, traders, algo traders, and they are designing their framework... they are ready to make changes as per the difficulties which traders are facing... broadly, I am of the view that it may take some time, but in the next maybe 1-2 months, definitely something will come out concrete, and based on that, again, we can see normalisation in the market... till then, option traders, especially writers or those who are using algorithms, they are trying to stay away from the market because of which volatility has also come down sharply in the market. You can see the market is falling gradually, but at the same time, intraday volatility is very low. Even if we consider Volatility Index (VIX), India's VIX index, that is also close to 11 or maybe 11.5 sort of levels, which is the lowest... it means that option traders are not active in this market. That is why I am of the view that it will take some time to come to normalcy. But eventually, definitely, we will come out with something that will help traders, option traders, I mean to say, in terms of managing their risk. It's not that they can increase their volume and all because our government is primarily focusing on controlling this particular speculative activity... they are trying to control that, and maybe because of that, I think they will come out with something which is very balanced."

ANI

37,157 Aufrufe • vor 8 Tagen

Most people think you need big money to start trading. You don’t‼️ What you actually need is skill, discipline, and patience. Starting small in trading is not a disadvantage. It’s actually one of the best things that can happen to a trader. Because when the account is small, the focus shifts away from chasing money and moves toward learning the game properly. You learn risk management. You learn patience. You learn that one clean setup is better than ten emotional trades. A lot of traders blow accounts because they try to skip the process. They want the big payouts immediately. They want the fast life before building the foundation. But the market has a way of humbling anyone who moves too fast. The traders who win long term are the ones who focus on percentages, not account size. Because if you can grow $100 consistently, you can grow $10,000. If you can manage risk on 0.01 lots, you can manage risk on 10 lots. The skill doesn’t change. Only the scale does. This is why smart traders build their edge first. Once the consistency is there, capital becomes easier to access, - whether through prop firms, reinvestment, or scaling up accounts. Trading is not about one lucky trade. It’s about building a system that works over and over again. So if you’re starting small, don’t rush it. Master the process. Protect your capital. Stay disciplined. Because in trading, small beginnings with consistency will always beat big accounts with no discipline.

Techriz💯📈

83,680 Aufrufe • vor 5 Monaten