Video wird geladen...
Video konnte nicht geladen werden
“The difference is a pathologist treats patients that are already dead.” This may be the dumbest thing Hank Brennan’s said so far in this case, and that’s saying a lot. How does one “treat” patients that are already dead? #KarenRead #KarenReadTrial
35,153 Aufrufe • vor 1 Jahr •via X (Twitter)
11 Kommentare

This is where his label "Word Salad" originates.

Leading psychiatrist says “this is the most important interview of all time, it solves the human condition, ends suffering & turmoil at its source & finally makes sense of our lives!”

Umm … well? It is inverted death causes. And that’s how the CW is going to try this case. Inverted or nothing.

If Breenan's expert has treated many patients that ended up dying (his words) , I would not want to be treated by that guy

Also, didn't Hank argue that treating an injury (dead or not) isn't the same as determining how an injury came to be when arguing to exclude Dr. Russell? And Dr. Russell IS actually a pathologist.

Like the lawyer asking the ME, "how did you know he was dead?" Because his brain was in a jar on a table. 🙄

@TheBigOldDog Spanky, though. He sure seems to delight in “treating the dead” to further gaslighting chaos beyond the grave.

Dr Wolf did an internship in Pathology 35 years ago….. Oh, Ok. summer job Pathologist is representing the CW because they hate that the State ME didn’t align her findings with the framing of Ms Read. Can you imagine they don’t call the lead investigator and the ME in this trial

It is Not Treatment. Treatment fixes, cannot fix dead tissue.

I'm still going with the freckles. Maybe he doesn't know big words like pathology.

Zombies Olivia. There be Zombies!
